Connect with us

News

Budget 2026: Govt agencies vote N400bn for mosques, palaces, halls

Published

on

About 78 Ministries, Departments and Agencies of the Federal Government set aside nearly N400bn in the 2026 budget for the construction and rehabilitation of community halls, mosques, traditional rulers’ palaces, village market squares and civic centres, The PUNCH findings show.

More than half of the N400bn was earmarked for non-developmental projects such as the supply of grains and motorcycles, sponsorship of community thrift societies, construction of museums and mini-stadia, as well as the supply of tricycles, popularly called ‘Keke Marwa’, to communities.

Some of the MDAs investigated are the Ministry of Defence Headquarters, the Nigerian Air Force, Air Power Centre of Excellence, Nigerian Defence Academy, Technical Aid Corps, Foreign Mission, Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation, Federal College of Land Resources, Owerri, Institute of Agricultural Research and Training, Ibadan, and the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

Others are the Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, Federal Institute of Industrial Research, Oshodi, National Building and Road Research Institute, National Productivity Centre, Industrial Arbitration Panel, Industrial Training Fund, National Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services, Zaria, Federal Cooperative College, Kaduna, among many others.

Critics argue that many of the projects earmarked do not rank among the country’s most urgent priorities, given Nigeria’s fiscal realities.

Analysts argue that the allocation of hundreds of billions of naira to numerous small and often low-impact projects deprives millions of Nigerians of the benefits of strategic public investment.

They contend that funds tied up in fragmented projects could instead be channelled into critical sectors such as healthcare, education, security, roads, power and other essential infrastructure that have a broader and more lasting impact on economic growth and citizens’ well-being.

According to the analysts, the proliferation of these relatively insignificant projects not only weakens fiscal discipline but also limits the government’s ability to deliver quality public services.

They warn that the opportunity cost is enormous, as scarce public resources are diverted from transformational national priorities to projects that frequently lack transparency, adequate oversight, or measurable developmental impact.

See also  FG sets 12-month deadline for HR officers certification compliance

Experts have also expressed concern that several budget items with little or no connection to the statutory responsibilities of certain MDAs were inserted into their allocations.

For instance, the National Building and Road Research Institute, Lagos, has bizarre projects inserted into its budget, including the construction of village halls in Akukwa, Anambra State; the building of an international market in Birniwa, Jigawa State; the construction of traditional rulers’ palaces at Sarkin Wuse, Osokodoko and Osana in Rivers State; as well as the construction and refurbishment of the palace of the Agbana of Isanlu in Kogi State.

Others are the provision of market stalls in Gubio, construction of a multipurpose hall in Sanga, Kaduna State, as well as the remodelling of five mosques at Izalla (Kebbi), Zawiya Centre (Kebbi), Ikole (Ekiti), and Mangadu and Samani (Jigawa). These items cost over N4bn in the 2026 budget, yet have nothing in return for the Federal Government, analysts warn.

Similarly, the National Productivity Centre’s budget contains unusual items such as support for Ijaw musicians, construction of an Emir’s palace in Nguru/Yusufari/Machina/Karasuwa in Yobe State, construction of an econometrics laboratory in Ekiti State, construction and refurbishment of Obas’ palaces at Ado Odo, Yewa and Ajilefe in Ogun State, as well as the construction of an abattoir in Akko, Gombe State.

The National Mathematical Centre, Nigeria’s apex institution for mathematical research and training, will finance the construction of a Sociology Department building at Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, which many say falls outside the agency’s core mandate.

A consultant economist and former central banker, Chukwunonso Ihuma, blamed the two chambers of the National Assembly for the situation. “All these are down to poor oversight by the National Assembly. In most cases, they are even the ones inserting, smuggling and padding these budgets,” he said.

He explained that the National Assembly often raises budgets sent to it by MDAs but seizes the opportunity to insert projects that make little or no impact on Nigerians.

See also  Natasha sympathises with Anthony Joshua, demands highway reforms

“This explains why we have to go back to zero budgeting. We have to start from scratch. The Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation should have the powers to discard any item that has no relevance to Nigerians.

“Markets are naturally meant to be handled by subnationals such as states and local governments, and traditional rulers should fix their palaces. Civic centres are projects done by village unions. If I were the president, I would give each MDA money per item,” he argued.

A zero budget is a financial planning method where all expenses must be justified from scratch for each new period, rather than simply adjusting previous budgets, according to Investopedia, an investment dictionary.

In April, President Bola Tinubu assented to the 2026 Appropriation Bill, which provides for aggregate expenditure of N68.32tn. He also signed the bill extending the implementation period for the 2025 budget from March 31, 2026, to June 30, 2026.

In July, the Senate approved a three-month extension for the implementation of the capital component of the 2025 Appropriation Act, moving the deadline from June 30 to September 30, 2026. This, according to lawmakers, was aimed at preventing project abandonment and ensuring full utilisation of already released public funds across MDAs. This means the nation is still implementing last year’s budget seven months into 2026.

The Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research said that “the successful implementation of the 2025 budget requires effective fiscal-monetary coordination, improved revenue mobilisation, and structural reforms to tackle inflation, exchange rate volatility, and social inequalities, while enhancing economic diversification and governance.”

The Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, said the stoppage of Ways and Means has created a big hole for the current government, noting that the government is struggling to adjust the budget or look for revenue to fill the gap.

See also  FG to fix skills gap, connect 20 million youths to jobs

Ways and Means implies the government drawing money from the central bank when in need of funds. Under former President, the late Gen Muhammadu Buhari, the nation’s Ways and Means rose to N30tn. Ways and Means have since been securitised.

The 2026 budget assumptions have been described by analysts as unrealistic. It assumes revenue of N36.87tn, leaving a substantial deficit to be covered through borrowing. The oil price was revised to $75 per barrel, up from the initial $64.85, while the oil production target was put at 1.84 million barrels per day.

GDP growth was estimated at between 4.28 per cent and 4.68 per cent, while debt servicing was put at N15.81tn. “We have to make a change and turn a new leaf. We did not have realistic projections in the budget, so the disparity is getting too big,” he said.

“Perhaps, we can begin to rely on experts to give us budgets that we have the capacity to handle. We are still struggling with the 2025 budget, yet we are still talking about the 2026 budget. Poor budgeting erodes the confidence of stakeholders, and some of the items are statutorily meant for states and local governments.”

Umar Sani, a media strategist and former adviser to Vice President Umar Sambo, said: “Even when you have such projects in the budget, the executive sometimes do not implement them, which explains why the legislators sometimes protest that certain aspects of the budget are not implemented.”

He explained that good leaders have, on several occasions, turned down budgets riddled with insignificant items. “So many things were brought to Buhari and Jonathan, but they did not sign them. This has been the case.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic

Published

on

Russia has issued a stern warning to NATO, stating it is fully prepared to use nuclear weapons if the Western alliance attempts to isolate or cut off Kaliningrad, the heavily militarized Russian exclave bordered by Poland and Lithuania.

In a formal diplomatic document transmitted to NATO, Moscow condemned the alliance’s actions as a “dangerous and reckless course” carrying “high risks of the outbreak of a direct armed conflict.” The communication explicitly warned that escalation could trigger “Russian strikes against decision-making centers in the alliance’s member states right from the outset.”

“Russia will be ready to use the entire arsenal of forces and capabilities at its disposal, including nuclear weapons, in order to defend its territory should NATO countries undertake any attempt aimed at isolating the Kaliningrad Region from the rest of the country,” the note stated.

Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons on NATO as tensions rise in the Baltic
The warning underscores mounting friction over Kaliningrad, a strategic territory slightly larger than Connecticut that serves as a vital Russian military outpost on the Baltic Sea.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova echoed the sentiment online, condemning statements from Western officials which she characterized as manifestations of “Russophobia” and a readiness for war.

“If Europe attacks Russia, it will be a completely different sort of war – a very short war,” Zakharova wrote, adding a call for European leaders to heed Moscow’s warnings. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov described the series of diplomatic notes issued across European embassies as necessary reminders directed at “hotheads in Europe.”

See also  Disu inaugurates state police implementation committee

 

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte firmly rejected the threats during a defense conference hosted by Euronews in Brussels, reiterating the alliance’s defensive posture and urging Moscow to cease its rhetoric.

“We are a defensive alliance. And stop the nuclear threats. This is absolutely not called for and not helpful,” Rutte said, noting that alliance activities pose no threat to Russian territorial integrity.

When asked if the threat of nuclear deployment in the Baltic region was imminent, Rutte dismissed the prospect: “No, it’s not. Putin knows that he can never win against NATO, so I don’t take this that seriously.”

Security analysts warn that the situation highlights a dangerous trajectory of mutual miscalculation. Nikolai Sokov, a Vienna-based nuclear analyst and former Russian diplomat, noted that escalating Western support for Ukraine risks pushing both sides past diplomatic thresholds.

“They expect more action, including a blockade of the Baltic Sea—just below the level of war in European calculation, but for them this will be open war. I see a risk of mutual miscalculation,” Sokov observed.

While Western governments continue to accuse Moscow of orchestrating a broader “hybrid war” across Europe through acts of sabotage and cyber interference, allegations that the Kremlin strongly denies, senior defense officials view the latest nuclear posturing as an unprecedented escalation unseen since the Cold War.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

SEE FULL LIST: Five EU nations plan deportation centres in Africa

Published

on

Five European Union countries are moving ahead with plans to establish centres outside the bloc for migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected, with the first facility expected to begin operations in Africa in 2027.

German broadcaster DW reports on Thursday that the five countries are working on what they describe as “return hubs” for people who have been ordered to leave the EU.

Rwanda and Uganda have repeatedly been mentioned by diplomatic sources and European media as possible locations, but neither country has been confirmed as the host.

The five countries involved:

1. Greece

Greece is leading the initiative and has indicated that the first return hub could become operational in the second half of 2027.

Its Migration Minister, Thanos Plevris, said an African country had already been selected, although its identity had not been disclosed.

Greece is also expected to assume the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2027.

2. Germany

Germany is part of the five-country group pushing for agreements with countries outside the EU to establish return hubs.

German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt previously said the group wanted to reach an agreement with third countries that would enable the establishment of the facilities.

Germany has also participated in discussions on the legal framework governing transfers of migrants who have no legal right to remain in the EU.

3. Austria

Austria is the third member of the group pursuing the return-hub arrangement.

Its Interior Minister, Gerhard Karner, has argued that the project could help reduce irregular migration and dangerous journeys to Europe.

See also  Kebbi schoolgirls’ abduction: DHQ summons, grills soldiers in Abuja

Austria has separately reached a migration and readmission agreement with Uzbekistan, although that agreement does not itself establish a return hub.

4. Denmark

Denmark has previously explored the possibility of transferring asylum seekers to a third country.

In 2021, Copenhagen passed legislation allowing such arrangements and held negotiations with Rwanda over a reception centre. The talks were suspended in 2023 after legal and logistical difficulties emerged.

Denmark has since shifted towards pursuing third-country arrangements together with other European countries.

5. Netherlands

The Netherlands is the fifth member of the group.

Dutch Migration Minister Bart van den Brink has said the proposed facilities should not be viewed as detention camps, but as places offering migrants who cannot remain in Europe another option while return arrangements are made.

The five countries agreed in September to step up discussions with potential partner countries and work towards establishing the hubs.

Plevris said Greece had selected an African country to host the facility but did not name it publicly.

The five countries, known as the “Group of Five”, have been working on a model under which migrants whose asylum applications have been finally rejected would be transferred to facilities outside the EU while arrangements for their return to their countries of origin are made.

The countries have stressed that the facilities would be open centres rather than detention camps.

Responsibility for people transferred to the hubs would remain with the participating European countries, rather than being handed over to the African host country.

The project is also expected to be financed by the five European countries, while organisations including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organisation for Migration could monitor operations.

See also  PHOTOS: Kidnapped Oyo pupils, teachers regain freedom from bandits’ captivity

The plan follows several unsuccessful efforts by European countries to outsource asylum processing or deportation arrangements.

The most prominent was Britain’s Rwanda scheme, under which the Conservative government sought to send asylum seekers arriving irregularly in the UK to Rwanda.

The British Supreme Court ultimately ruled the policy unlawful, citing concerns that people sent to Rwanda faced a real risk of being returned to countries where they could face persecution or inhumane treatment.

Italy has also operated migrant centres in Albania since 2024. Italian courts initially blocked transfers to the centres, while one facility has subsequently been used as a deportation centre for men whose asylum applications were definitively rejected.

The Italian scheme has involved significant costs, with DW reporting that the expenditure is expected to exceed €670m by 2028.

A Reuters report published on September 30 said Rwanda had held preliminary discussions with some EU member states about potentially hosting transferred migrants, but that no agreement had been reached.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Elon Musk returns to US govt for Pentagon war study

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk will make a return to officially advising US President Donald Trump’s government by co-leading what the Pentagon called a study on the future of war.

Musk served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) before departing in May 2025, having publicly fallen out with Trump.

In a speech at the Quantico military base, Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said “Project Meridian” will be “an effort led by America’s best minds to study the future of warfare”.

“We are leveraging a unique source of American advantage, one our adversaries do not have: our innovators, our senior leaders and our technologists,” Hegseth said.

Musk will be a co-leader of Project Meridian alongside Palmer Luckey, the 34-year-old co-founder of defense technology company Anduril Industries, and Newt Gingrich, the 83-year-old Republican former House speaker.

Musk threw his support behind Trump and helped his return to the White House, but the men later had a high-profile blow-up over the president’s spending legislation.

He later resumed giving to Republican causes, including multimillion-dollar donations to individual candidates and conservative political groups.

Hegseth said the project’s purpose is to “creatively look to the future and identify the domains that we must conquer and capabilities we must master”.

Project members will include hand-picked private sector leaders and subject matter experts from across the innovation, academic and policy ecosystems.

Hegseth said he has directed Project Meridian’s findings to be completed and submitted within 120 days.

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Natasha sympathises with Anthony Joshua, demands highway reforms
Continue Reading

Trending