Connect with us

News

Customs seek legislative overhaul of waivers, Customs Act provisions

Published

on

The Nigeria Customs Service has pushed for a comprehensive legislative review of Nigeria’s import waiver and concession regime, urging the National Assembly to examine whether the incentives continue to justify their fiscal cost and support the economic objectives for which they were established.

The Comptroller-General of Customs, Bashir Adeniyi, also urged the legislative arm to commence a review of the Nigeria Customs Service Act 2023, saying three years of implementation had exposed provisions that may require refinement to keep pace with the country’s rapidly evolving trade environment.

Adeniyi made the appeal on Wednesday in Abuja during a two-day retreat organised for the Senate Committee on Customs with the theme, “Legislative Oversight in the Context of Nigeria Customs Service Modernisation and Reforms.”

Rather than focusing solely on the Service’s record-breaking revenue performance, the Customs boss challenged lawmakers to shift legislative oversight from individual cargo clearances to the design of the digital systems driving customs operations.

He argued that the next phase of oversight should interrogate automated risk management, valuation databases, cargo release timelines and the effectiveness of tax exemptions instead of isolated operational decisions.

Speaking on the waiver regime, Adeniyi said a significant volume of imports enters the country under government-approved concessions, the continued relevance of which warrants legislative attention.

He said, “Third, engage us on the exemption regime. A substantial volume of trade enters this country under waivers and concessions granted for policy reasons. Whether those concessions still serve the purposes for which they were created is a legislative question rather than a Customs one, and we would welcome your attention to it.”

The latest call comes weeks after Adeniyi raised fresh concerns over the growing scale of import duty waivers, revealing that exemptions granted by the Federal Government had reached unprecedented levels.

Last month, during an investigative hearing of the Senate Committee on Finance with revenue-generating agencies, the Customs boss disclosed that the value of Import Duty Exemption Certificate approvals granted by the Federal Government on selected imported goods and equipment rose to N34tn in 2025.

“IDEC approvals reached about N34tn in 2025, 60 per cent of which was rightly granted by the government for military hardware procurement, which attracted duty exemptions because of Nigeria’s prevailing security challenges,” he said during the meeting.

See also  US commits $3.5m to monitor Nigeria’s religious violence

The Customs chief also urged the lawmakers to undertake a post-implementation review of the Nigeria Customs Service Act 2023, describing the legislation as the legal foundation that made the agency’s ongoing reforms possible.

According to him, three years of implementation have generated sufficient evidence for Parliament to determine which provisions are functioning effectively and which require amendment.

He said, “The Act has now been in operation for three years. A statute of that age is no longer a proposition; it is a record. There is now evidence of which provisions have worked as intended, which have proved harder to apply than the drafting anticipated, and which the pace of trade has already begun to overtake.

“A legislature rarely gets to see its own statute at work from the inside. Over these two days you will. I would ask you to treat this retreat as an occasion for reviewing the Act as much as for reviewing the Service, to ask our resource persons not only what we have built, but whether the law you gave us is proving adequate to what we are now being asked to do. Where it is not, we would rather you heard it here than discovered it in three years.”

Adeniyi maintained that Customs modernisation was fundamentally about replacing human discretion with transparent, technology-driven systems capable of producing consistent decisions regardless of the officer handling a transaction.

He explained that the deployment of the indigenous B’Odogwu customs platform and the Trade Modernisation Project represented more than a software upgrade, describing them as reforms designed to eliminate manual processes and improve accountability.

He said, “We mean the replacement of discretion with rules. Every point at which an officer exercises personal judgement over a consignment is a point at which the outcome depends on that officer, on his training, his workload, his integrity and his mood on the day. Modernisation is the systematic reduction of those points and their replacement with risk rules, automated valuation references and data-driven targeting that produce the same answer regardless of who is at the desk.

“That is why the Trade Modernisation Project matters, and why the deployment of B’Odogwu is more than a change of software. A customs administration that runs on paper is an administration in which the file can be found or lost, moved forward or held back. An administration that runs on a single electronic record is one in which every decision leaves a trace, every delay has an owner, and every intervention can be reconstructed after the fact.”

While highlighting the agency’s financial performance, Adeniyi cautioned against judging Customs solely by revenue growth. He disclosed that the Service generated N7.277tn in 2025, exceeding its annual target by 10.24 per cent, while collections between January and May 2026 reached N3.35tn.

See also  FRSC unveils safer road‑habits campaign in Anambra

However, he argued that exchange rate adjustments could artificially inflate revenue figures, insisting that the real measure of success lies in institutional reforms.

He said, “Revenue growth in a period of currency adjustment can flatter an administration that has done very little. What matters is whether the growth rests on better systems or on favourable arithmetic. I put it to you that ours rests on systems, and the purpose of this retreat is to let you examine that claim rather than accept it from me.”

The Comptroller-General further called for sustained legislative support for Customs reforms, warning that modernisation efforts often encounter resistance because automation removes discretionary powers that some interests seek to preserve.

He said, “Customs reform fails in most countries not for want of technical capacity but for want of political protection. Every modernisation reduces somebody’s discretion, and discretion is valuable to those who hold it. An administration that automates a process is removing something from someone, and that someone will often be better connected than the officer implementing the change.

“The protection that endures beyond any single administration is legislative protection. Where this Committee makes it known that the reform has the confidence of the Senate, resistance to it becomes materially harder.”

He also urged lawmakers to evaluate Customs based on measurable trade outcomes rather than administrative activities. “Hold us to outcomes rather than to activity. Ask what the release time was, not how many meetings were held about it,” he added.

Earlier, the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Customs, Senator Jibrin Isah, commended the Nigeria Customs Service for surpassing its 2025 revenue target, describing the performance as evidence that ongoing reforms were yielding tangible results.

See also  ‘Liars’ – Sowore Blasts MTN Boss Over Unlimited Data Comment

According to him, Customs generated about N7.3tn in 2025 against an approved target of N6.5tn. He said, “We must commend the Nigeria Customs Service under the leadership of Comptroller-General Bashir Adewale Adeniyi for surpassing its revenue target in 2025. There has been a quantum leap in revenue generation, improved trade facilitation, and robust anti-smuggling activities.

“On behalf of the Senate, I want to appreciate the Comptroller-General, members of management and staff of the Nigeria Customs Service for this impressive performance.”

The lawmaker assured the Service of the National Assembly’s support in addressing legislative obstacles to its reforms.

He said, “Going forward in 2026, we believe that you can do a lot better. What you need to do is identify your challenges and address them as much as possible so that you can have a much more robust performance in 2026 and beyond. Where you require legislative backing, please do not hesitate to call on us.

“At the end of this retreat, my colleagues will be better ambassadors of the Nigeria Customs Service.”

Isah also congratulated Adeniyi on his re-election as Chairman of the World Customs Organization Council, describing the achievement as international recognition of Nigeria’s growing influence in global customs administration.

The PUNCH reports that the Nigeria Customs Service Act 2023 replaced decades-old customs legislation and introduced sweeping reforms, including legal backing for electronic cargo processing, advance rulings, Authorised Economic Operator status and a new funding framework for the Service.

Since its enactment, the agency has accelerated its digital transformation through the rollout of the indigenous B’Odogwu customs platform and the Trade Modernisation Project, both aimed at reducing cargo clearance time, improving transparency, strengthening risk management and enhancing revenue collection.

The latest call for a legislative review signals that Customs now wants Parliament to assess whether aspects of the law and Nigeria’s longstanding waiver and concession regime remain fit for purpose amid changing global trade patterns.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Governors spend N512bn on travels, offices

Published

on

Thirty-three state governments spent at least N512.10bn on Government Houses, Governors’ Offices and travel and transport in the first six months of 2026, an amount about 4,713 times higher than the combined six-month salary of Nigeria’s 36 governors, an analysis of state budget implementation reports has shown on Monday.

The analysis showed that while a governor’s stated monthly salary of N503,000 translates to N3.018m over six months, the combined six-month salary of all 36 governors would amount to just N108.65m.

Against this, the available records showed that N420.01bn was identified under Government House, Governor’s Office and related executive administration expenditure, while another N92.09bn was spent under travel and transport budget heads.

The combined amount stood at N512.10bn. The six-month salary of all 36 governors, therefore, represented only 0.02 per cent of the identified expenditure on executive offices and travel.

The figures offers a striking contrast to the ongoing debate over the official salaries of Nigerian governors.

Delta State Governor, Sheriff Oborevwori, recently said his monthly salary was N503,000, arguing that some senior civil servants, including permanent secretaries earned N900,000 monthly, more than state governors.

But an analysis of the cost of maintaining the offices occupied by governors shows that their salaries represent only a fraction of the wider public expenditure and perks associated with the offices.

While the personal salary of a governor may appear modest compared with the salaries of some senior public servants, the analysis shows that the wider cost of maintaining the executive office runs into hundreds of billions of naira.

The figure is not the personal income of governors. Government House and Governor’s Office budget heads cover a broad range of official expenses, including administrative operations, staff, protocol, maintenance, official residences, utilities, security-related activities, state functions and other expenditure required to run the executive arm of government.

Similarly, travel and transport spending covers official local and foreign trips, transportation and related expenses across the wider state public service.

However, the figures provide an indication of the enormous public cost attached to maintaining the structures surrounding the offices of state governors and the larger fiscal question on the  total public cost of maintaining the office and the administrative structures around it.

The analysis is based on available Budget Implementation Reports for the first and second quarters of 2026, using the largest identifiable Government House, Governor’s Office or executive administration expenditure line in each state, alongside the general travel and transport expenditure head.

See also  Ogun govt wades in after father of triplet flees hospital

Abia, Adamawa, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Plateau, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara had the complete data. Comparable data were unavailable for Edo, Osun and Rivers.

For comparison, available records for the first half of 2025 showed N465.07bn spent under Government House, Governor’s Office and similar executive administration heads, while N92.73bn was recorded for travel and transport. The combined figure stood at N557.80bn.

This means that, based on the states and budget heads for which comparable data were available, the first-half 2026 expenditure was about N45.70bn lower, representing a 8.19 per cent decline, compared with the corresponding period of 2025.

Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure accounted for the larger share of the spending.

The amount fell from N465.07bn in the first half of 2025 to N420.01bn in the corresponding period of 2026, representing a reduction of N45.05bn or 9.69 per cent.

Travel and transport spending, however, was largely unchanged. Available records showed that states spent N92.09bn on travel and transport in the first six months of 2026, compared with N92.73bn in the same period of 2025.

This represented a marginal decline of about N643.66m, or 0.69 per cent.

The figures suggest that while spending under Government House and executive administration heads moderated in the available records, the cost of official travel remained broadly stable.

Commenting on the development, a development economist, Aliyu Ilias, said the enormous cost associated with maintaining executive offices showed why it was misleading to focus only on a governor’s basic salary without taking into account the wider expenses and privileges attached to the office.

He argued that executive offices in Nigeria had become excessively expensive to maintain, partly because political office holders had significant influence over how the institutions under their control were structured and funded.

“Ordinarily, anything that has to do with executive office in Nigeria appears to be much more expensive because they actually direct how it works there. And with the docile state assemblies we have, who always concur, it is clear that our democracy is very expensive because of the way we maintain their offices, and that is why it is very juicy.

See also  Atiku gives Tinubu seven-day ultimatum on audit bill

“Some even want to go as far as borrowing money to win an election and, when they enter office, they believe they are going to repay the money. So, it is not correct to say that a Permanent Secretary is earning better than a governor when you isolate the governor’s salary without adding the other travel perks and expenses attached to the office.

“The governor just wanted to be sensational. But with the addition you have done, it shows that they are taking the bigger cheque from the spending arising from the high income that the state is generating,” Ilias said.

A state-by-state analysis of the 2026 Government House or Governor’s Office expenditure, Kogi recorded the highest amount at N65.34bn, followed by Ogun with N45.26bn and Lagos with N45.04bn.

Kano recorded N25.87bn, while Ekiti spent N25.22bn and Cross River recorded N23.92bn.

Bayelsa recorded N22.99bn, Imo N19.43bn and Enugu N16.20bn.

At the lower end of the available records, Oyo recorded about N1.95bn, Sokoto N2.20bn, Kwara N2.59bn and Abia N2.78bn.

Kogi’s figure alone represented more than 15 per cent of the identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure captured in the 2026 dataset.

On travel and transport, Plateau recorded the highest identifiable expenditure at N10.11bn in the first six months of 2026.

Lagos followed with N8.23bn, while Taraba recorded N5.16bn.

Niger spent N4.45bn, Ekiti N4.41bn, while Bauchi recorded N3.75bn and Yobe N3.68bn.

Oyo recorded one of the lowest identifiable amounts at N667.52m, while Kano recorded N626.95m.

The figures also showed wide variations in expenditure patterns between 2025 and 2026.

For example, Kogi’s Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure increased from N51.99bn in the first half of 2025 to N65.34bn in the corresponding period of 2026. This represented an increase of about N13.34bn, or 25.66 per cent.

Bayelsa’s identifiable spending rose from N14.48bn to N22.99bn, an increase of N8.51bn, or 58.75 per cent.

Cross River’s expenditure increased from N9.91bn to N23.92bn, representing a rise of about N14.01bn, or 141.37 per cent.

Ekiti, which had no comparable 2025 figure in the dataset provided for this analysis, recorded N25.22bn in the first six months of 2026.

See also  Police arrest AFP journalists covering #FreeNnamdiKanu protest in Abuja

Other states, however, recorded significant reductions.

Ogun’s identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure declined from N49.83bn in the first half of 2025 to N45.26bn in 2026, a reduction of N4.57bn, or 9.17 per cent.

Kano’s expenditure fell from N28.84bn to N25.87bn, representing a decline of about N2.98bn, or 10.32 per cent.

Niger recorded a smaller decline from N13.13bn to N14.15bn, although the available figures show an increase of about N1.02bn, or 7.74 per cent, underscoring the differences in spending patterns across the states.

Lagos recorded one of the most significant increases in the available data, with identifiable spending rising from N25.86bn in 2025 to N45.04bn in 2026, an increase of about N19.18bn, or 74.16 per cent.

The Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission is constitutionally responsible for determining the remuneration of governors and other political office holders. The existing remuneration framework remains in force while a broader review is being processed by the relevant authorities.

In recent weeks, RMAFC said its review of remuneration for executive and legislative office holders had reached an advanced stage, with proposed legislation expected to be considered by the National Assembly.

The spending also comes at a time when state governments have received significantly higher allocations from the Federation Account following the Federal Government’s economic reforms.

An analysis of Ministry of Finance data previously showed that N47.25tn was shared through the Federation Account between 2023 and 2025 alone, accounting for more than half of the N93.13tn distributed over the nine years from 2017 to 2025.

The sharp increase in revenues has intensified public scrutiny over whether the additional resources flowing to states are being translated into better infrastructure and public services.

The records reveal a huge gap between the official salaries of governors and the actual cost of maintaining the executive structures around their offices.

While the basic pay of a governor may appear modest, it represents only a fraction of the public funds required to run Government Houses, Governors’ Offices and official travel. The broader question, therefore, is not simply how much governors earn as salaries, but how much it costs taxpayers to maintain the offices they occupy.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Despite Court Warrant, Sunday Igboho Allegedly Stops Police From Arresting Tani Olohun In Ibadan

Published

on

A disturbing incident in Ibadan has raised serious questions about the conduct of the Nigerian Police and the circumstances surrounding the alleged attempted arrest of a traditionalist,Tani Olorun, reportedly over his longstanding religious disagreements with some Islamic clerics in Kwara State.

According to accounts circulating about the incident, a Toyota Hiace bus allegedly arrived at the traditionalist’s residence in Ibadan with four men believed to be police officers. Two were reportedly dressed in police uniform while the other two were in mufti.

What immediately raised suspicion was that the vehicle allegedly had no visible number plate, while the men reportedly failed to produce police identification when requested by the resident’s wife and neighbours. As the situation attracted a crowd, concerns grew that what was being presented as an arrest could instead be an unauthorised attempt to forcibly remove the man from his residence.

The situation reportedly took an even more dramatic turn when Chief Sunday Igboho arrived at the scene and intervened, insisting that the men follow proper police procedures.

The intervention reportedly stopped the attempted removal and the men were ordered to return to their ilorin base.

But the bigger question remains:

Why would security personnel travel all the way from Kwara to Ibadan to remove a traditionalist from his home under circumstances that allegedly failed to meet basic standards of police identification and due process?

The controversy is particularly sensitive because Tani Olorun has reportedly had longstanding disputes with some Islamic clerics over religious issues. He was previously arrested in Kwara following allegations that he defamed an Islamic cleric and reportedly spent a prolonged period in detention before his release.

See also  NMA conducts court-ordered checks on Kanu, submits report

His subsequent outspoken criticism of religious teachings and defence of traditional African religion have reportedly continued to generate controversy.

This is where Chief Sunday Igboho’s confrontation with the Kwara State Commissioner of Police becomes significant.

Igboho was reportedly heard questioning why the Kwara Police Command[b] appeared to have the resources and urgency to pursue a controversial religious-related arrest in Ibadan, while communities in Kwara continue to complain about kidnapping, banditry and insecurity, including attacks allegedly affecting ordinary citizens and traditional rulers.[/b]

His message was essentially this:

If the police can travel from Kwara to Ibadan to arrest a traditionalist over a religious dispute, why has the same urgency not been demonstrated in confronting the kidnappers and bandits terrorising Kwara communities?

That question deserves a serious answer.

The Nigerian Police Force must not allow legitimate law enforcement to be confused with intimidation, religious persecution or extra-judicial abduction. If an individual is wanted for an offence, the police should identify themselves properly, present the appropriate documentation and follow established legal procedures.

No Nigerian citizen should be secretly taken away from his home under questionable circumstances.

And if this was indeed a legitimate arrest, then the authorities should explain clearly what offence was alleged, what warrant or lawful authority was relied upon, why officers travelled from Kwara to Ibadan, and why the operation reportedly generated such serious concerns about its legitimacy.

Chief Sunday Igboho’s intervention has therefore brought an important issue to the public space:

Law enforcement must protect Nigerians from kidnappers—not create circumstances in which Nigerians begin to fear that the police themselves may come to take them away.

See also  FRSC unveils safer road‑habits campaign in Anambra

The allegations surrounding this incident should be thoroughly investigated, and the public deserves transparency.

Security must never become a tool for religious vendetta. Justice must never be selective. And an arrest must never look like a kidnapping.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

US plans mass visa revocation for asylum seekers — Report

Published

on

The United States government is planning to revoke the business and tourism visas of as many as 200,000 foreigners who have sought or are seeking asylum in the country, in what could become the largest mass visa revocation in US history.

The planned action targets holders of B1 and B2 visas issued between 2016 and 2026 who entered the US as short-term visitors but subsequently applied for asylum, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press and two US officials, as reported by the agency on Monday.

The State Department is expected to begin announcing the revocations in the coming weeks in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security.

State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott confirmed the planned action but said the number of affected people could change.

“We are coordinating with DHS to identify and revoke the nonimmigrant visas of foreigners who have come to the United States claiming to be short-term visitors, but then file for asylum to stay here permanently,” Pigott said.

He added that “the number of revocations remains dynamic” and that the action would be carried out “on a rolling basis.”

The revocations would not automatically lead to immediate deportation, according to the officials. People with pending asylum applications would instead lose their B1 or B2 status while their cases are considered.

Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau defended the proposed policy, arguing that visitor visas should not be used as a route into the US asylum system.

“Asylum isn’t supposed to be a loophole to circumvent immigration law,” Landau said in a post on X.

See also  FG to fix skills gap, connect 20 million youths to jobs

B1 visas are generally issued for business travel, while B2 visas cover tourism, family visits and medical treatment. Applicants are required to demonstrate that they intend to return to their home countries.

What it could mean for Nigerians

The proposed revocation could affect Nigerians among other foreign nationals, although the US government has not disclosed how many Nigerians may be involved in the 200,000 figure.

Nigerians have historically accounted for a significant share of African asylum applications in the US. According to UNHCR figures previously reported by The PUNCH, 2,827 Nigerians applied for asylum in the US in 2024.

Between 2022 and 2024, US immigration courts granted asylum to 1,372 Nigerians, while 1,534 applications were denied.

For Nigerians currently holding B1 or B2 visas who have applied for asylum, the development could mean losing their visitor status and facing closer scrutiny of their immigration cases. It also signals a tougher environment for Nigerians seeking to use short-term US visas as a pathway to remain in the country.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending