Connect with us

Lifestyle

Awujale: Ruling house sues Ogun, kingmakers

Published

on

The Fusengbuwa Ruling House in Ijebu-Ode has dragged the Ogun State Governor, Dapo Abiodun; the Awujale kingmakers; and five others, including the Chairman of Ijebu-Ode Local Government, Dare Alebiosu, before the Ogun State High Court sitting in Ijebu-Ode, seeking orders compelling the completion of the process for selecting the next Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland.

The suit, dated August 21, 2026, a copy of which was made available to journalists on Monday, was filed by the Chairman of the ruling house, Abdulateef Owoyemi; Deputy Chairman, Adedokun Ajidagba; and Vice Chairman, Prof Fassy Yusuf.

The defendants, as stated, are the Commissioner for Justice and Attorney-General, Mr Oluwasina Ogungbade (SAN); the Ogun State Executive Council; the Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs, Ganiyu Hamzat; and the Secretary of Ijebu-Ode Local Government.

Others listed as defendants are members of the Awujale Afobaje/Kingmakers Council, including Sonny Kuku, Chief Rasheed Adesanya, Chief Oluwaranti Osifeso, Chief Jimi Lawal, Chief Abimbola Okenla, Chief Kunle Ogunade, Chief Agboola Alausa, Chief Adebisi Adaran and Chief Ayotunde Odulaja.

The claimants are asking the court to determine whether the government had the legal power to order or facilitate the alleged entry into and locking of the Awujale Palace on January 20, 2026, “to physically prevent” the kingmakers from convening and concluding the statutory selection process for the new Awujale.

They also want the court to determine whether the Obas and Chiefs Law permits the state government to halt the nomination or selection process for the Awujale “under any guise.”

The claimants further want the court to determine whether, having convened a meeting of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House and completed its internal nomination process within the period prescribed by law, the family had discharged its statutory responsibility under Section 16 of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.

They also want the court to determine whether the kingmakers, having received the ruling house’s nomination list, became obligated to select a candidate from the list and forward the name to the Ogun State Executive Council.

See also  Ìwòyè-Kétu: The Yoruba Town That Spans Two Nations and Lives by Ancient Taboos

The claimants are further asking the court to determine whether the statutory process for selecting the new Awujale had commenced following notices issued by the sixth defendant on December 2, 2025, December 4, 2025, and January 6, 2026.

The Awujale stool became vacant following the death of the late monarch, Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, on July 13, 2025, at the age of 91, after a historic 65-year reign.

The plaintiffs claimed that Ijebu-Ode Local Government notified the ruling house on December 2, 2025, that it was its turn to produce a candidate under the rotational arrangement provided by the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021.

The ruling house subsequently commenced its nomination process and held a meeting on January 12, 2026, within the 14 days prescribed by Section 16(1) (b) of the law.

According to the claimants, a total of 95 princes and princesses were nominated, with the full list forwarded to the nine-member Awujale Afobaje Kingmakers Council on January 19, 2026, for the next stage of the process.

The claimants alleged that less than 24 hours after the list was submitted, police officers stormed the Awujale Palace after midnight on January 20 and prevented the kingmakers from meeting to select a preferred candidate from among the 95 nominees.

A subsequent letter from the local government cited security concerns and allegations of bribery and financial inducement as reasons for the suspension of the process by the state government.

The ruling house, however, contended that no evidence or formal petition supporting the allegations was presented. It further claimed that investigations by the police and the Department of State Services did not establish any wrongdoing.

In their suit, the claimants are asking the court to declare that the nomination process was validly completed and that the kingmakers are legally required under Sections 16(1)(e) and (f) of the law to select a candidate from the submitted list and forward the name to the State Executive Council.

See also  The People Are Suffering, But Their Pastors Are Living Large! Questions About Wealth, Faith and Accountability

They also contended that the Executive Council is required under Section 22 of the law to act on the kingmakers’ selection.

Among other reliefs, the ruling house is asking the court to order the kingmakers to reconvene within seven days of judgment and complete the selection process.

It is also seeking an injunction restraining the state government and security agencies from further interfering with the process.

The claimants also want the court to determine:

“Whether, having regard to the strict provisions of Section 16(c) of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021 and having convened a meeting of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House and completed the internal nomination of candidate(s) within the time prescribed by law, the claimants are not deemed to have duly and completely discharged their statutory responsibility of nominating candidate(s) for the vacant stool of Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland.

“Whether, having regard to the strict provisions of Section 16(e) of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, and the Chieftaincy Declaration regulating the selection of the Awujale of Ijebuland, and upon the delivery of the Fusengbuwa Ruling House/Family Nomination List to the seventh to 15th defendants, the seventh to 15th defendants did not become obligated to proceed to select a person to fill the vacant stool of Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland, and thereafter forward the name of the person so selected to the third defendant.

“Whether, by the provisions of Section 22 of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, the third defendant is not obligated, upon the presentation of a selected candidate to it, to act on such selection.

“Whether the first to sixth defendants, or any of them, possessed any power under the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, or any other written law, to direct or cause the forcible entry into, and locking of, the Awujale Palace by officers of the Nigerian Police as was done after midnight on Tuesday, January 20, 2026.”

See also  Photos from actress Bukky Wright's son's wedding

Consequently, the claimants are seeking, among other reliefs:

“(a) A declaration that the claimants, having convened their Ruling House meeting and completed the nomination of candidate(s) on or about January 12, 2026, pursuant to the public notice published on December 4, 2025, and the letter of January 6, 2026, have fully and duly discharged their statutory responsibility of nominating candidate(s) for the vacant stool of Awujale and Paramount Ruler of Ijebuland under Section 16(1)(b) of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, and are accordingly estopped from being required to reopen, repeat or recommence the said nomination process.

“(b) A declaration that the seventh to 15th defendants, having received the Fusengbuwa Ruling House/Family Nomination List on January 19, 2026, are obligated by Section 16(1)(e) and (f) of the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021 to select a candidate therefrom and to forward the name of their selected or preferred candidate to the third defendant.

“(c) A declaration that the lockout of the Awujale Palace, purporting to halt the selection process, is unlawful, ultra vires the Obas and Chiefs Law of Ogun State 2021, and done in breach of the claimants’ and the seventh to 15th defendants’ right to fair hearing, and is accordingly null, void and of no effect.”

Counsel for the claimants, led by Olusegun Otayemi, argued in the originating summons that the state’s chieftaincy law provides a sequential process of nomination, selection and approval, which must be followed once initiated.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

RESPECT IS RECIPROCAL: YOU CANNOT DEMAND WHAT YOU REFUSE TO GIVE

Published

on

Why do some people demand respect from everyone while treating others with disrespect?**

There is something deeply wrong with a society where people believe that respect should flow in only one direction.

Some people want to be respected because they are older, wealthier, more educated, more influential or occupy positions of authority. Yet they feel entitled to insult, intimidate, humiliate and belittle those they consider beneath them.

They want people to bow before them, but they refuse to treat others with dignity.

They want their opinions respected, but they dismiss the opinions of others.

They demand loyalty, but offer betrayal. They demand kindness, but practise cruelty. They expect understanding, but show little consideration for anyone else’s feelings.

**Is that respect, or simply an abuse of power?**

## Respect is not determined by wealth, age or status

Having money does not make you more human than someone who is struggling financially.

Being a boss does not give you the right to humiliate your employees.

Being a parent does not mean your children have no feelings or deserve no consideration.

Being older does not automatically make every decision you make right.

And holding a position of authority does not give you permission to treat people as though they have no value.

True respect is reflected in your character, behaviour and treatment of other people.

## Stop confusing fear with respect

This is where many people get it wrong.

Some people believe that because others remain silent around them, they are respected.

See also  Professor Toyin Omoyeni Falola

But silence is not always respect.

Sometimes people are simply afraid of your anger, your influence, your financial power or the consequences of disagreeing with you.

You may command obedience through intimidation, but you cannot force genuine admiration.

**People may fear your power without respecting your character.**

## Respect begins with how you treat people

If you want people to respect you, start by examining how you treat them.

Respect the poor. Respect the vulnerable. Respect people who cannot offer you anything in return.

Respect those who disagree with you. Respect people’s boundaries. Respect their dignity, even when you have more money, authority or influence than they do.

You do not have to agree with everyone, but disagreement should never become an excuse for humiliation.

Respect does not mean tolerating abuse or surrendering your boundaries. It means recognising that every human being deserves basic dignity.

## The question we must all answer

Before demanding respect from others, take a moment to examine yourself.

Are you the kind of person who gives the respect you constantly demand?

Do you treat your domestic workers, employees, relatives, neighbours and strangers with the same dignity you expect from those around you?

Or do you believe respect is something other people owe you simply because of who you are?

**Remember: Respect is reciprocal. You cannot continuously disrespect people and expect genuine respect in return.**

### NEWSBREAK365 FINAL THOUGHT

The true measure of a person’s greatness is not how many people bow before them, but how many people they treat with dignity.

See also  Alaafin, Soun absent as Makinde kicks off Oyo 50th anniversary

**Never demand from others what you are unwilling to give.**

—

**JOIN THE CONVERSATION**

Do you believe respect should be given automatically, or should it be earned through character and behaviour?

Can someone genuinely demand respect while constantly disrespecting others?

Share your thoughts. Your opinion matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Informing, Challenging Perspectives and Inspiring Conversations.*

#RespectIsReciprocal #MutualRespect #HumanDignity #CharacterMatters #LifeLessons #SocialValues #Newsbreak365

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

YOUR WEALTH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO OPPRESS THE POOR: STOP EXPLOITING THOSE WHO HAVE LESS THAN YOU

Published

on

Having money does not make you superior. Having power does not give you the right to intimidate others. And being in a position of authority does not make you the owner of another person’s dignity.

There is something deeply troubling about a society where some people believe that having money, connections, influence or authority gives them permission to treat less privileged people like they are worthless.

Some wealthy individuals look down on the poor. Some employers intimidate their workers because they know those workers depend on their salaries to survive. Some people in positions of authority exploit the vulnerability of those who cannot afford to challenge them.

Others use their financial advantage to humiliate, manipulate and silence people who have fewer opportunities.

But let us ask an important question: **When did having more become a licence to mistreat those who have less?**

## THE POOR ARE HUMAN BEINGS, NOT YOUR PUNCHING BAGS!

Being poor does not mean someone deserves humiliation.

A person struggling financially still deserves respect. Someone working for you is not your slave. A person who cannot afford to challenge your decisions is not someone you have the right to exploit.

Whether someone is a cleaner, security guard, domestic worker, factory employee, labourer, driver or street vendor, their dignity matters.

You may have the money, but they have feelings. You may have influence, but they have families to feed. You may have power, but they deserve justice.

Never confuse someone’s inability to fight back with permission to mistreat them.

See also  TRAUMA MAY EXPLAIN SOMEONE’S BEHAVIOR, BUT IT SHOULD NEVER BECOME AN EXCUSE TO DECEIVE OR HURT AN INNOCENT PERSON.

## WEALTH SHOULD BUILD PEOPLE, NOT DESTROY THEM

What is the purpose of becoming wealthy if your success comes at the expense of other people’s suffering?

Why intimidate an employee who is already struggling to survive? Why refuse to pay someone what they have legitimately earned? Why use your position to frustrate someone simply because you know they cannot afford to challenge you?

True success should create opportunities, encourage fairness and improve lives.

Pay people fairly. Respect their contributions. Treat workers with dignity. Help vulnerable people when you can.

You do not have to become poor to show compassion to the poor.

## REMEMBER: LIFE CAN CHANGE

The person you humiliate today may not remain in that position forever.

Financial circumstances can change. Positions can change. Businesses can collapse. Opportunities can disappear. The person who appears powerless today may become successful tomorrow.

Nobody knows everything tomorrow holds.

That is why humility matters.

Do not allow your present success to make you arrogant. Do not allow your wealth to destroy your humanity.

## THE MESSAGE IS SIMPLE

If you have more than others, remember that your advantage comes with an opportunity to make a positive difference.

Stop exploiting the poor. Stop intimidating vulnerable people. Stop using money and authority to silence those who have less.

**Be wealthy, but remain humane. Be powerful, but remain humble. Be successful, but never lose your conscience.**

Because at the end of the day, your bank balance may reveal how much money you have, but your treatment of other human beings reveals your character.

See also  Woman who made husband swear for infidelity rejoices over mother-in-law’s death

**LET’S TALK:**

Why do some people become wealthy and powerful only to use their position to intimidate, exploit and oppress those who are less privileged?

Is it greed, arrogance, lack of compassion or a society that has normalised the abuse of power?

What is your opinion?

Share this article. Someone needs to hear this message.

#Newsbreak365 #HumanityFirst #RespectThePoor #StopOppression #StopExploitation #WealthAndCharacter #SocialJustice #Compassion

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Mohbad Family demands identity of US lab for DNA test

Published

on

The family of late singer Ilerioluwa Aloba, popularly known as Mohbad, has demanded the disclosure of the identity of a United States laboratory expected to conduct a DNA test to determine the paternity of Liam, the singer’s son.

The family also called for the postponement of the examination scheduled for Saturday, October 31, at the Mainland General Hospital/IDH, Yaba, Lagos, pending clarification of its concerns over transparency and compliance with a court order.

In a statement signed by the family head, Samuel Aloba, and sent to PUNCH Metro on Thursday, the family said it was concerned about arrangements for the tissue-based DNA examination, particularly reports that samples would be collected in Lagos and sent to a laboratory in the US for analysis.

The family said it wanted clarification on whether the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre, which it claimed was designated by a court order issued on May 5, 2026, would conduct the examination or merely collect and dispatch the samples abroad.

“This raises a fundamental question that must be answered before the exercise proceeds: Is the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre itself going to conduct the examination contemplated by the court, or is it merely going to collect and dispatch samples to another laboratory?

“The distinction is material. Where a court has directed that a scientific examination be conducted at a particular institution, the parties are entitled to clarity regarding the manner in which that directive will be implemented.

“If the designated centre intends to rely on a foreign laboratory to conduct the analysis, the arrangement should be explained and, where necessary, presented to the court for clarification,” the statement read.

See also  Professor Toyin Omoyeni Falola

The family said no institution or party should unilaterally substitute a materially different arrangement for one contemplated by a subsisting court order without appropriate judicial clarification.

The family also demanded the full name and address of the proposed overseas laboratory, evidence of its accreditation and technical competence, details of the testing procedure, and documentation showing how the samples would be collected, labelled, preserved, transported and examined.

It further requested a mechanism to verify that the samples collected in Lagos were the same ones received and analysed by the foreign laboratory.

The statement added, “The family has been informed that the identity of the proposed overseas laboratory may be disclosed only to the court. While the family recognises the importance of protecting legitimate confidential information, confidentiality cannot be permitted to defeat the basic requirements of transparency, accountability and meaningful verification in a process whose outcome may have far-reaching legal and personal consequences.”

The family said its concerns were not an attempt to frustrate the judicial process or prevent a scientifically valid examination but to ensure that the outcome could withstand independent scrutiny.

It expressed apprehension about possible interference, mishandling or manipulation of the process if adequate safeguards were not established before the examination.

However, the family clarified that it was not claiming that the proposed test had already been compromised or that manipulation had been established.

“In a matter as sensitive as Mohbad’s DNA, the result must not merely be announced; it must be demonstrably reliable. The integrity of the process must be capable of independent verification, from the point of sample collection to the final laboratory report,” it said.

See also  Ìwòyè-Kétu: The Yoruba Town That Spans Two Nations and Lives by Ancient Taboos

The family also linked its concerns to questions it had previously raised about the handling of biological samples during the post-mortem examination conducted in connection with Mohbad’s death.

It questioned the role of the pathologist involved in sample collection during the coroner’s inquest.

The family further claimed that information it received from its enquiries indicated that the laboratory to which samples from the earlier process were purportedly sent had not received them or any specimen registered in the name of Ilerioluwa Promise Aloba.

It stressed, however, that the assertions represented its account of the matter and required clarification and verification, adding that they were not findings of a court or independently established proof of wrongdoing by any individual or institution.

The family maintained that it supported a credible DNA examination capable of resolving Liam’s paternity but insisted that the identity of the testing laboratory and the chain of custody of the samples must be clear.

It called on the relevant authorities to address its concerns, provide the necessary information and ensure that the examination complied with the court’s order and accepted forensic procedures.

The family consequently requested the postponement of Saturday’s exercise until the outstanding issues were clarified, adequate notice was given to all parties and their legal representatives, and further directions were obtained from the court where necessary.

It said its objective was not to predetermine the outcome of the examination but to ensure that the eventual result was based on a credible and properly documented process.

The family added that the public interest in establishing the truth should not be undermined by avoidable uncertainty or a lack of transparency.

See also  Photos from actress Bukky Wright's son's wedding

Mohbad died at 27 on September 12, 2023. Following his death, the Lagos State Police Command inaugurated a 13-man special investigation team to probe the circumstances surrounding his passing.

Earlier reports in 2024 indicated that Aloba, through legal representatives, filed an application at the coroner’s court in Ikorodu to determine the cause of Mohbad’s death and later demanded a DNA test to resolve the paternity dispute.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending