Connect with us

Politics

Obi, Alia lock horns over blocked Benue visit

Published

on

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Peter Obi, and the Benue State Government on Tuesday traded blame over the disruption of his planned visit to Yelwata, Benue State, as some youths barricaded a major road in Makurdi and prevented his convoy from proceeding to the community.

Obi, who said he travelled to Benue to condole with families of victims of the Yelwata massacre, accused suspected hired thugs, allegedly acting on the orders of a government aide, of blocking his movement.

But the state government denied involvement in the incident, insisting that Obi failed to follow the necessary protocol by formally notifying the government of his visit and accusing him of attempting to create a political controversy.

The Yelwata attack occurred between June 13 and June 14, 2025.

The conflicting claims came even as the Benue State Police Command confirmed that it was aware of Obi’s visit and had deployed officers to provide security for his movement.

The police, however, said it was investigating why some youths stopped the presidential candidate’s convoy.

The incident occurred on Gboko Road, near the Nigerian Air Force Base and Makurdi Airport, where protesters reportedly barricaded the road and chanted, “We don’t want Peter Obi.”

The development caused traffic disruption in the area for several hours and eventually forced Obi’s convoy to turn back to the airport before he returned to Jos, Plateau State.

Obi had arrived in the state as part of a planned visit to Yelwata, where more than 200 people were reportedly killed in an attack on the community in June 2025.

Speaking at the scene in a video posted by News Central Television via its X page on Tuesday, Obi said he was informed that youths had been mobilised to prevent him from proceeding to the community.

“I was told that youths, led by an SA (Special Assistant) to the government, have decided to block the road and make sure I don’t go there,” he said.

The former Anambra State governor described the development as unacceptable, arguing that the youths involved were themselves victims of poverty and insecurity and should not be deployed for political purposes.

“The rascality they are bringing into this country is totally unacceptable. People are being killed every day in Benue. People want to show that they are with them, and I came here all the way this morning, a long distance, only to be told what you are seeing here,” he said.

Obi maintained that his planned visit was humanitarian and that his itinerary had not been concealed from the relevant authorities.

The NDC presidential candidate was expected to travel to Yelwata to meet families of victims of the June 2025 attack, which drew widespread condemnation and renewed national attention to the worsening security situation in Benue.

The attack, which lasted for several hours, reportedly claimed the lives of more than 200 residents, with homes and other properties also destroyed.

The killings attracted condemnation from within and outside Nigeria, with President Bola Tinubu and other political leaders visiting the state or expressing solidarity with the victims and affected communities.

Obi’s visit was therefore expected to focus on the families of those killed and the wider security challenges confronting communities in the state.

The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 general election and a leading opposition figure ahead of the 2027 presidential election, Peter Obi.

The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, Photo: X | Peter Obi.

However, his planned journey was cut short when the youths blocked his convoy around Gyado Villa along the Gboko Road.

Despite the presence of police officers, the youths reportedly insisted that Obi would not be allowed to proceed.

The governorship candidate of the NDC in Benue State, Prof Terhemba Shija, who spoke to our correspondent on Tuesday, said the party had duly informed security agencies about Obi’s visit.

He said the visit was not intended as a campaign rally but to enable Obi to identify with families of victims of the Yelwata attack.

“Is Obi not a presidential candidate? INEC has lifted the ban on campaign and we duly informed the police and DSS about his visit to the state. They deployed police and DSS to be with us,” he said.

When asked if the state government was informed of the visit, Prof Shija dismissed the question, stating that the state government should be aware that the Independent National Electoral Commission had lifted the ban on campaigning.

“But the government is aware that INEC has lifted the ban on campaigning; do we need to take permission from the candidate? Prof Shija asked.

The governorship candidate described the incident as “a demonstration of fear, a clear show that Obi is the man to watch,” arguing that there was no justification for preventing the presidential candidate from visiting bereaved families.

“he has come just to see families of victims of Yelwata; why should somebody stop a legitimate candidate after he has officially given notice to CP and DSS?” he asked.

But the Benue State Government rejected allegations that it sponsored or organised the youths who blocked Obi’s convoy.

Benue State Governor Hyacinth Alia
File: Benue State Governor, Hyacinth Alia

The Commissioner for Information and Orientation, Solomon Iorpev, said Obi had failed to officially inform the state government about his visit, arguing that, given his status as a former governor and presidential candidate, adequate security coordination was required.

See also  I did my best as President, Jonathan counters Atiku

According to Iorpev, the state government had a responsibility to ensure the safety of high-profile visitors but could not effectively discharge that responsibility if it was not formally informed of their movements.

He said, “A high-profile person who has been a former governor of a state is coming into the state; he should have written a letter to the state government.

“We are supposed to guarantee his safety and protection, but in an instance where no letter was written, we could not guarantee his safety. This is not the first time he is doing this. He is just looking for our trouble. We are peace-loving and hospitable people.”

The commissioner said he did not know the identity of the youths who blocked the road, but suggested that the incident might have coincided with a gathering of youths from the state’s 23 local government areas.

He said, “So, if they were coming from either Tarka, Gboko, Buruku, Ushongo, Konshisha or Vandeikya at the same time of his visit and blocked the road, it is unfortunate. I do not know the youths who did that,” the commissioner said.

The Chief Press Secretary to Governor Hyacinth Alia, Kula Tersoo, also denied that the governor or the state government had anything to do with the incident.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, Tersoo described Obi’s allegations as unfounded and an attempt to drag the governor and the people of the state into what he characterised as an internal political dispute within the NDC.

“We wish to emphatically deny that the government of Rev. Fr. Hyacinth Alia has an idea of what Mr Obi is talking about.

“Based on his antecedents of making untrue statements against the state, we have every reason to doubt whether he visited Makurdi, the state capital, today,” he said.

Tersoo said Obi did not pose any threat to the governor and argued that if there had been any genuine security concern surrounding the presidential candidate, recognised security agencies would have been responsible for handling it.

He stated that the governor was opposed to thuggery and that his administration did not use political thugs as instruments of governance or security.

Tersoo said the state government was committed to the rule of law and relied on recognised security agencies to maintain peace.

“It is, therefore, curious that an individual presenting himself as a presidential candidate could arrive in a state without the relevant security authorities being formally informed of his movement.

“Ordinarily, such a visit would attract the attention and necessary security coordination involving the Commissioner of Police and other relevant security agencies.

“We really find it difficult to understand the basis for Mr Obi’s attempt to connect every fabrication with the Benue State Government, and Governor Hyacinth Alia in the first instance.

“If Mr Obi is confronted with disagreements or internal political challenges within his party structure in Benue State, those issues should be resolved within the party rather than being conveniently transferred to the State Government,” he said.

Tersoo said the Alia administration would not be distracted by the controversy, insisting that its focus remained on governance, security and the welfare of Benue residents.

He urged the public to disregard claims linking the state government to the incident and said Benue remained open to political actors and other Nigerians who visited the state peacefully.

However, the police account appeared to contradict a key aspect of the state government’s claim that relevant authorities were not informed of Obi’s movement.

The Commissioner of Police, Cletus Nwadiogbu, confirmed that the police command had been notified of the visit.

The CP said he had directed the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Operations, to personally lead officers assigned to provide security for Obi.

“I also asked the AC Operations to personally lead the men, but unfortunately, on his arrival, we heard that the youth blocked the road because they didn’t want to see him. That is the reason we are going in to find out why such conduct, why the youth behave that way.

“We have tactically managed the situation for now, but we are not letting it go. We must get to the bottom of it to know why the youths said somebody can not move.”

Nwadiogbu described Obi as “a very responsible man” and confirmed that the presidential candidate eventually returned after the blockade.

“I heard that the youth blocked the road and I learned he went back and left.”

The police command’s spokesperson, DSP Peter Aondongu, had earlier confirmed that officers were deployed for Obi’s movement to Yelwata.

He said the reason the youths blocked the convoy remained unknown and that the command was investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident.

“We can confirm that the police are aware of the incident involving Peter Obi’s movement to Yelwata. Police operatives provided security for the movement.

See also  Ekiti: Stop harassing opposition, you won’t be first incumbent to lose election — Ogunsakin tells Oyebanji

“The reason the convoy was blocked by some youths is still unknown. We are monitoring the situation and investigating the circumstances surrounding the incident.

“Further updates will be provided accordingly,” PPRO said.

Obi decries attacks, displacements

Speaking in Jos, Plateau State, after departing Benue State, Obi expressed concern over the prolonged killings and mass displacement of residents in Plateau State, describing the continued existence of internally displaced persons camps as evidence of the state’s failure to guarantee citizens’ safety.

Speaking during a sympathy visit to a community in Mangu Local Government Area of the state, which was recently affected by attacks, Obi said his visit was not politically motivated, but was aimed at identifying with Nigerians who had been forced from their ancestral homes by insecurity.

“As long as you are in an IDP camp, Nigeria is in an IDP camp. It is when you go home that Nigeria is at home. You are not supposed to be here,” Obi told displaced persons at the camp.

He called on the Federal Government to take decisive steps to end the killings, kidnappings and displacement of communities, particularly in Plateau and Benue states.

While acknowledging the role of prayers in addressing the nation’s challenges, Obi stressed that government has the primary responsibility of protecting lives and prosecuting perpetrators of violence.

“I hear people say we need prayers. Yes, we need prayers. But government must act. The people coming to kill are not from the moon. We know them. The Nigerian government should be able to deal with it,” he said.

Obi expressed worry over the humanitarian impact of the crisis, noting that about 45,000 persons from more than 20 communities in Plateau have been displaced.

“You can imagine 45,000 people displaced from over 20 communities. That is unacceptable. It is something we must not allow to continue,” he added.

The NDC candidate also decried the effect of the attacks on education, saying the destruction of communities had forced many children out of school.

He noted that this was his third visit to affected communities in the state, during which interventions such as the construction of a school and provision of water had been carried out.

“I came here today not to campaign. I came to assure you that you are in our thoughts. We are hoping that one day we will come here and none of you will be here because you have all returned to your homes,” Obi said.

He commended the resilience of the displaced persons and urged government to create an enabling environment for them to return and rebuild their lives.

Reactions trail Benue incident

The Peoples Democratic Party governorship candidate in Benue State, Chief Michael Aondoakaa (SAN), condemned the incident, describing it as an assault on democracy and the constitutional rights of Nigerians.

In a statement issued by his Media Assistant, James Ian, Aondoakaa argued that citizens had the constitutional right to move freely, associate and participate in political activities.

“As such, no individual, group, or government has the authority to deny any Nigerian access to any part of the country on account of political affiliation,” he said.

The former Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation said political leaders and presidential candidates should be allowed to travel across the country and engage with citizens ahead of the 2027 elections.

He said, “Any attempt to obstruct, intimidate, or attack a political leader exercising that right runs contrary to the spirit of democratic competition and undermines the President’s call for a peaceful and inclusive political process.”

Aondoakaa also argued that the incident violated the recently signed political peace accord under which political parties and candidates committed themselves to issue-based campaigns, non-violence and respect for the rights of political opponents.

He said democracy should be based on the free exchange of ideas rather than intimidation and political intolerance.

The PDP candidate said the incident had the potential to portray Benue negatively, but cautioned against interpreting the actions of a few individuals as representative of the entire state.

“Benue people are renowned for their hospitality, civility, and respect for visitors. Our state has always welcomed people from different political, ethnic, and religious backgrounds.

“The attack on Mr Peter Obi is therefore inconsistent with the true identity of our people and should be condemned by all lovers of democracy irrespective of political affiliation,” he said.

Aondoakaa called for an impartial investigation and prosecution of anyone found responsible for obstructing Obi’s movement.

He also urged security agencies to protect all political actors and citizens exercising their constitutional rights.

The NDC, for its part, demanded an immediate investigation into the incident and the arrest and prosecution of those responsible.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, described the blockade as disturbing and condemnable, insisting that Obi’s visit was motivated by a desire to identify with victims of the Yelwata massacre.

“Although access to the community was denied today, the hearts and prayers of the NDC and our presidential candidate remain with the victims, their families, and the entire Yelwata community.

See also  Peter Obi charges new INEC chairman, Amupitan on credible guber poll in Anambra

“We will not be deterred. The NDC will persist until we restore the fundamental responsibility of government: the protection of every Nigerian’s life,” the party said.

It subsequently called on the state government and security agencies to investigate the incident.

“We call on the Benue State Government and relevant security agencies to immediately investigate this incident, bring the perpetrators to justice, and guarantee the safety of all citizens and leaders who seek to show solidarity in times of grief,” Director added.

The NDC also argued that Obi’s visit should be viewed against the background of the party’s broader political and humanitarian engagements ahead of the 2027 election.

Former governor of Sokoto State, Aminu Tambuwal, in a post on X, condemned the treatment meted out to Obi in Benue State.

According to the statement, Tambuwal said, “The reported obstruction of his movement by a group of youths is unacceptable, undemocratic and completely inconsistent with the kind of politics we should be practising in Nigeria.

“Mr Peter Obi is a Nigerian citizen, a former governor and the presidential candidate of a duly recognised political party.

“Like every Nigerian, he has the constitutional right to move freely throughout the country and undertake lawful activities without intimidation, harassment or obstruction.

“More importantly, with political campaigns now underway, every candidate must be allowed to travel freely across Nigeria, meet with citizens, canvass for support and conduct legitimate political activities without fear.”

He added, “Our democracy cannot descend into a situation where political actors or their supporters determine who may enter a state, community or any part of the country. No individual, group or political interest has the authority to deny another Nigerian access to any part of our country.

“Political differences must never become an excuse for intimidation, violence or brigandage. We must compete on the strength of our ideas, programmes and policies and, ultimately, allow Nigerians to make their choices freely at the ballot box.

“I, therefore, call on the Inspector-General of Police and all relevant security and law-enforcement authorities to investigate the circumstances surrounding this incident and ensure that those responsible are identified and held accountable in accordance with the law.

“This kind of rascality must not be tolerated, irrespective of who is involved or which political party is affected. Today, it may be Peter Obi; tomorrow, it could be another candidate.

“Nigeria belongs to all of us, and every Nigerian must be free to move and participate in our democratic process without fear or intimidation.”

Also, the National Electoral Accountability Consortium and Tap Initiative for Citizens’ Development called for an investigation into the obstruction of the convoy of Obi in Benue State.

The groups condemned the incident, saying no Nigerian should be prevented through intimidation, threats or violence from exercising a lawful political or civic right.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, NEAC and Tap Initiative said videos and reports from the scene showed individuals blocking the road and moving towards vehicles in Obi’s convoy.

The organisations, however, said the identities and motives of those responsible had yet to be established and urged that the circumstances surrounding the incident be independently investigated.

They said the incident was troubling regardless of the political affiliation of those involved, warning that political competition must not become a licence for violence.

“NEAC and Tap Initiative consider this incident deeply troubling, irrespective of the political identity of those involved.

“No Nigerian should be prevented through intimidation, threats or violence from exercising a lawful political or civic right. Political disagreement is legitimate; political violence is not,” the organisations said.

They also warned political parties, candidates and their supporters against inflammatory rhetoric, threats and the mobilisation of supporters against political opponents as the country approaches another electoral cycle.

The groups called on the Nigeria Police Force and other security agencies to conduct a “prompt, impartial and transparent investigation” and ensure that anyone found culpable was prosecuted in accordance with the law.

They further urged security agencies to ensure that political actors could move freely and conduct lawful political and civic activities without intimidation or obstruction.

The controversy is not the first between Obi and the Benue State Government over his proposed visits to the state.

In April 2025, Obi alleged that he was prevented from visiting Benue on humanitarian grounds.

The renewed dispute therefore comes at a time when political parties are increasingly stepping up activities ahead of the 2027 general election.

The Independent National Electoral Commission has lifted restrictions on political activities, paving the way for parties and candidates to intensify mobilisation, consultations and public engagements.

The political temperature is consequently rising, with opposition parties seeking to expand their reach across states traditionally regarded as strongholds of rival political parties.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Gombe 2027: Pantami, Mailantarki, Garry enter fresh PDP ticket battle

Published

on

CHIMA AZUBUIKE examines the political dynamics surrounding the fresh Gombe State governorship primary holding Tuesday (today), which pits former minister Isa Pantami against Khamisu Mailantarki and Usman Garry

Today, former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Prof. Isa Pantami; businessman and politician Khamisu Mailantarki; and Usman Garry will again hit the field to battle for the Peoples Democratic Party governorship ticket in Gombe State for the 2027 election. The fresh governorship primary election complies with an order by the Federal High Court sitting in Gombe. The court, in a judgment on September 24, nullified the May 26 primary that produced Pantami, directing the PDP to conduct another exercise within 30 days, in compliance with its Constitution, guidelines and relevant electoral laws.

The judgment delivered by Justice Amina Mohammed followed a suit filed by Usman Garry, a PDP governorship aspirant, who challenged the process through which Pantami emerged as the party’s candidate. Garry objected to the affirmation of Pantami as the standard-bearer of the Abdulrahman Mohammed-led faction and eventually filed a suit against the former minister. Garry had asked the court to set aside Pantami’s emergence because the PDP did not conduct a valid governorship primary in accordance with its rules and applicable electoral laws.

The Federal High Court nullified the process that produced Pantami and ordered the PDP to conduct a fresh primary. The court found problems with the process that produced Pantami and directed the party to repeat the exercise in accordance with its guidelines and applicable electoral laws.

Before joining the PDP, the former minister had sought the governorship ticket of the All Progressives Congress. When the APC settled on Jamilu Gwamna as its consensus candidate, Pantami withdrew from the contest and subsequently moved to the PDP. His arrival immediately altered the calculations within the opposition party.

Pantami’s impending movement to the PDP circulated while Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir, Garry and Monica Kaltho were preparing for the party’s governorship contest.

Pantami will again slug it out with other aspirants, Mailantarki and Garry, who reject the former minister’s entry into the governorship ticket race.

Between Pantami, Mailantarki, and Garry

Pantami enters Tuesday’s contest as a politician whose national profile gives the primary a significance beyond the ordinary competition for a party ticket. A former Director-General of the National Information Technology Development Agency and former minister, Pantami boasts supporters who argue that his experience, networks and resources make him capable of mounting a serious challenge against the APC candidate, Gwamna.

Mohammed Kudu, a PDP chieftain, dismissed the capacity of some of the other aspirants to confront the governing party, describing Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir and Garry as weak to confront the APC candidate.

Kudu said, “Who among Khamisu Mailantarki, Saleh Abdulkadir, Garry Usman has what it takes to challenge the APC? We recognise that Jamilu Gwamna is grassroots; hence, the only person that can face him, man to man, is Malam (Ali Pantami). He has made money as former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, and as former Director-General of NITDA and as a visiting lecturer. Maybe Saleh Abdulkadir, who seems genuine, but you know he is not as wealthy as he used to be.”

He added, “He (Ali Pantami) has the capacity to defeat Gwamna of APC in a fair contest because he has international connections and he has built enough capital in both human and other resources that translate into wealth. All that will count in the build-up to the election.”

Kudu’s comments reflect one side of the political argument surrounding the PDP contest: that the party needs a candidate with sufficient political, financial and organisational resources to confront the APC.

See also  Peter Obi charges new INEC chairman, Amupitan on credible guber poll in Anambra

But that argument is contested by opponents of Pantami’s emergence.

For them, the issue is not simply whether Pantami possesses the resources or profile to contest the 2027 election. They question the circumstances surrounding his entry into the PDP and his rapid movement from APC aspirant to PDP governorship candidate.

Dr Maryam Abubakar, a policy analyst, described what she called the “unprecedented desperation” surrounding Pantami’s political journey.

She said, “How can you once say politics is dirty, only for late President Muhammadu Buhari to appoint you from NITDA to cabinet minister, and you suddenly forget your sermons where you lashed politics and politicians.”

Abubakar also questioned Pantami’s relationship with the APC before his defection.

She said the former minister, despite developing an interest in politics, failed to support the governing party sufficiently.

“Even when his interest began to manifest, he refused to empower the party members or support the party to achieve its mandate in the state. Instead, we started hearing rumours that Malam (Ali Pantami) was funding African Democratic Congress in Gombe but refused to identify with them publicly because of court cases ADC faced and alleged possible witch-hunt by the anti-graft body,” she added.

“How can you contest this week in APC and next week become a PDP candidate? It’s the height of desperation. As a technocrat and Islamic scholar, we expected a new order in the way of doing things, not doing things like regular politicians who lack ideals and purpose. What was baffling was allowing yourself to be a product of a corrupt process.”

So, the PDP held the May 26 primary amid misgivings. The decision to challenge the primary was therefore not unexpected.

Gombe’s political landscape is shaped by local structures and established political networks, while national visibility and access to influential political actors can also affect a candidate’s campaign.

The PDP’s choice will therefore be watched beyond the immediate party contest.

The Gombe PDP primary has consequently evolved from an ordinary intra-party contest into a test of how political ambition, party organisation and electoral law intersect.

Today’s exercise is, therefore, a bid to correct issues of the past. The PDP is now conducting a new nomination process, creating a fresh opportunity for all three cleared aspirants.

Although Saleh Abdulkadir was prominent in the initial contest and was mentioned among those who challenged Pantami’s emergence, the PDP’s current list of cleared aspirants for Tuesday’s primary comprises Pantami, Mailantarki and Garry.

That means the field has narrowed considerably from the wider contest that preceded the May primary.

Abdulkadir’s absence from the fresh contest further concentrates the battle among three political camps.

For the PDP, this may make the primary easier to organise, but it does not necessarily make the political dispute less complicated.

The principal disagreement remains over the process that brought Pantami into the party’s nomination race and the question of whether the fresh exercise can finally settle the matter.

For Pantami, it provides the opportunity to seek a new mandate from the party after his first nomination was nullified.

For Mailantarki and Garry, it offers the opportunity to challenge Pantami through a fresh process in which they have been cleared to participate.

And for the PDP, it presents another opportunity to conduct a process that can withstand judicial scrutiny.

Circumventing legalities

The legal questions surrounding Tuesday’s contest became complicated on September 24 when the Supreme Court restored provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 dealing with party membership registers and the nomination of candidates. The apex court upheld the validity of Sections 77(5), 77(6), 77(7) and 84(2), reversing the earlier Court of Appeal position that had voided the provisions.

See also  Xenophobia: 130 Nigerians sign up for South Africa evacuation

Section 77(5) requires that persons eligible to vote at party primaries must have their names contained in the membership register submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission within the prescribed period.

The controversy followed the timing of Pantami’s movement from the APC to the PDP.

According to the account supplied by Gombe public affairs commentator, Chika Udenkwo, Pantami left the APC on May 19, while the APC primary was held on May 21 and the PDP primary took place on May 26.

Udenkwo therefore argues that the key question is not simply whether Pantami defected from the APC before the PDP primary.

The more precise question, he says, is whether Pantami’s name appeared in the PDP membership register submitted to INEC within the statutory period applicable to the May 26 primary.

He said, “Pantami left the APC on May 19. The APC primary followed on May 21. And on May 26, Pantami emerged from the PDP primary.”

He added, “The question now is not simply whether he had left the APC before joining the PDP. The more precise question is this: Was Pantami’s name contained in the PDP membership register submitted to INEC within the statutory period applicable to the May 26 primary?”

According to Udenkwo, if May 26 is used as the reference date, the 21-day period would take the relevant deadline back to May 5.

“That makes the documentary evidence critical. Was Pantami already a PDP member by that date? Was his name on the register submitted to INEC? When exactly was that register submitted? And was the same register actually used for the May 26 primary?” he asked.

Those questions, however, must be distinguished from the legal effect of the September 24 Supreme Court judgment itself.

The Supreme Court’s ruling restored the provisions; it did not, by itself, pronounce on Pantami’s individual eligibility for Tuesday’s Gombe primary.

As today’s fresh primary holds, one of the questions includes whether the party has complied with the applicable requirements for the new primary, including membership records, notice, screening, participation and its own guidelines.

The membership-register question could nevertheless become significant if a litigant argues that an aspirant or delegate was not properly qualified under the restored provisions.

On the contention, Udenkwo argued, “A victory on Tuesday would give Pantami a fresh nomination, not a reliance on the May 26 exercise that has already been nullified.

“But that victory would still have to survive any subsequent legal challenge—one based on compliance with the Electoral Act, the PDP Constitution, the court’s order, and the applicable membership register.”

He added, “In other words: winning the primary and establishing the legal validity of the nomination are related—but distinct—questions. That reasoning also applies to Mailantarki and Garry.

“If either defeats Pantami, the resulting nomination would equally be subject to the statutory and party requirements governing the fresh primary.”

For Mailantarki and Garry, Tuesday’s contest is an opportunity to reset a process that both have spent months challenging.

Their opposition to Pantami’s emergence was not limited to political statements. Their objections eventually formed part of the litigation that produced the Federal High Court’s order for a fresh primary.

The two now have to shift from challenging the previous process to competing within the new one. That presents a different political calculation.

Instead of asking the court to remove Pantami from a ticket already produced by the party, they must now persuade delegates or eligible party members to choose either of them over the former minister.

See also  Crude-for-loans: NNPCL battles N8.07tn outstanding debt

The question therefore becomes whether the legal challenge has translated into political momentum.

Mailantarki’s position has also been affected by the withdrawal of Kaltho, who had initially been part of the challenge before later aligning with Pantami.

Kaltho’s movement altered the political arithmetic around the opposition to Pantami, leaving Mailantarki, Garry and Abdulkadir among the figures challenging the earlier emergence.

Whether that change will have an effect on Tuesday’s voting remains a political question to be answered by the primary.

A primary under scrutiny

The September 29 exercise is also taking place under a level of scrutiny that the May primary did not successfully withstand.

The Supreme Court, in its judgment, restored statutory provisions concerning party membership registers and nomination procedures.

Political observers are consequently watching not only the outcome but the process.

Tuesday’s primary presents a credibility test for the PDP.

The party has already experienced the consequences of an internal nomination process that ended in litigation.

The Federal High Court’s order provides the party with an opportunity to correct the procedural issues that led to the nullification of the earlier exercise.

Udenkwo said, “The question becomes whether the PDP has complied with the requirements applicable to this fresh primary: the membership register, notice, screening, delegate participation, and the party’s own constitution and guidelines.”

He added, “And here, the Supreme Court’s ruling makes the membership register particularly significant. The law does not merely require a party to maintain a register. It requires that register to be submitted to INEC within the prescribed period—and it restricts participation in the primary to persons whose names appear in it.”

Today, the PDP will have to be able to demonstrate compliance with the court order and the applicable electoral framework.

The scrutiny will extend to the eligibility of delegates, the party’s register and the conduct of the exercise.

Udenkwo said, “The Supreme Court has now made the statutory validity of Sections 77 and 84 clear. What it has not done is determine the factual circumstances of every candidate or every primary conducted before its judgment.”

“That leaves room for litigation—where an aspirant believes a party failed to comply with the membership-register requirements or other statutory conditions,” he added.

For now, however, the PDP’s immediate responsibility is to conduct the fresh exercise ordered by the Federal High Court.

For Pantami, Tuesday offers a second opportunity to secure the party’s ticket through a fresh primary. For Mailantarki and Garry, it offers a second opportunity to challenge him directly rather than through the previous process. For the PDP, it offers the chance to close a chapter that has already generated substantial internal disagreement and legal action.

But whether Tuesday finally closes that chapter will depend not only on who wins, but on how the party conducts the exercise.

The 2027 question

Tuesday’s primary cannot be viewed entirely in isolation from the wider 2027 contest.

The APC has already positioned Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The contest is therefore framed along the line of having a candidate that can challenge the APC in the general election.

For Kudu, Pantami’s national profile and network give him the capacity to confront Gwamna.

But the argument also exposes one of the central issues before PDP delegates: whether the choice of candidate should be determined primarily by political experience, organisational structure, personal resources, grassroots networks, national connections or some combination of these factors.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Atiku, ADC to amend Tinubu eligibility suit ahead of 2027 elections, read details

Published

on

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the African Democratic Congress have moved to amend their suit challenging President Bola Tinubu’s eligibility to contest the 2027 presidential election, with the Federal High Court in Abuja fixing October 13, 2026, to hear the application.

The suit also joined the All Progressives Congress and the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1888/2026, the suit was slated for further mention before Justice Inyang Ekwo.

When the case was called, counsel for the plaintiffs, Joseph Silas, told the court that processes had been served on all the defendants within the stipulated period, and that the plaintiffs had received and responded to their processes.

Recall that an earlier dispute over service of the processes on the first defendant had stalled proceedings in the case.

Counsel for the President, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), reminded the court that at a previous hearing on September 1, 2026, counsel for the second defendant, Popoola Owosanya, had offered to receive the court processes on behalf of the first defendant.

Olanipekun told the court that the offer had been rejected by the plaintiffs’ counsel, who later approached the court for an order permitting substituted service on Tinubu, alleging that the plaintiffs subsequently attempted to “deceive this court” by claiming that they were unable to serve the first defendant.

Justice Ekwo, however, urged the lawyers to focus on the business of the day.

Silas subsequently informed the court of the plaintiffs’ application to amend their originating summons. He said counsel to the defendants had been put on notice of the application.

After confirming that the lawyers had indeed been served with the application, Justice Ekwo adjourned the case.

See also  Atiku demands release of El-Rufai before Eid celebrations, says detention unfair
Tinubu
President Bola Tinubu. Photo: State House

“This case is hereby adjourned until the 13th of October 2026, for hearing of the motion to amend the originating summons,” the judge held.

The PUNCH reports that Atiku and the ADC instituted the suit in August, challenging Tinubu’s eligibility to contest the 2027 presidential election.

Their case centres primarily on an alleged discrepancy involving the name on a National Youth Service Corps discharge certificate submitted to INEC and the President’s official name.

The allegation forms part of the substantive issues yet to be determined by the court.

ADC

The court had on September 16 granted the plaintiffs permission to serve Tinubu through the APC after the plaintiffs told the court that efforts to effect personal service on the President had proved difficult.

The order had been challenged by the APC, which argued that Tinubu’s lawyers had already collected the originating processes and filed his defence before the application for substituted service was made.

Meanwhile, INEC has also filed a response challenging the competence of the action, including arguments relating to the plaintiffs’ locus standi and alleged abuse of court process.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

PDP members decamp to APC in Kwara ahead of 2027

Published

on

No fewer than 1,500 members of the Peoples Democratic Party in Alapa/Onire/Odegiwa Ward, Asa Local Government Area of Kwara State, have defected to the ruling All Progressives Congress.

The decampees announced their decision to join the APC on Sunday during a ward meeting attended by the Chairman of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Abdullateef Alakawa; a member of the Kwara State House of Assembly, Shittu Motunrayo; and other party executives and supporters.

The new APC members said they left the PDP, led in the state by former Senate President, Bukola Saraki, due to what they described as mistreatment of members, imposition of candidates and poor reward for loyalty.

They also said they were attracted to the APC by what they described as the party’s visible achievements and opportunities for members, particularly youths.

Addressing the decampees, Alakawa welcomed them to the APC, assuring them that they would be treated as members of the same political family.

Chairman of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Abdullateef Alakawa; a member of the Kwara State House of Assembly, Shittu Motunrayo; and other party executives and supporters while receiving the decampees on Sunday.
Chairman of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Abdullateef Alakawa; a member of the Kwara State House of Assembly, Shittu Motunrayo; and other party executives and supporters while receiving the decampees on Sunday.

He said, “Today, we are receiving no fewer than 1,500 members of the PDP from Alapa/Onire/Odegiwa Ward into the APC. Their decision to join us is a clear indication of their confidence in the APC and its programmes.

“There is no newcomer in the APC. Everyone is one, and we are all working towards a common goal. Those who perform well and occupy political positions are also leaders of the party.”

The LNRBDA chairman urged the new members to remain committed to the party and contribute to its growth at the grassroots.

See also  Atiku demands release of El-Rufai before Eid celebrations, says detention unfair

Alakawa also commended the Kwara State Governor, AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, for what he described as his performance in Asa Local Government Area.

Chairman of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Abdullateef Alakawa; a member of the Kwara State House of Assembly, Shittu Motunrayo; and other party executives and supporters while receiving the decampees on Sunday.

Chairman of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Abdullateef Alakawa; a member of the Kwara State House of Assembly, Shittu Motunrayo; and other party executives and supporters while receiving the decampees on Sunday.

“Governor AbdulRazaq has done well for the people of Asa, and the best way to reward his efforts is to support and vote for him in the forthcoming Kwara Central Senatorial District election,” he stated.

The lawmaker representing the area, Shittu, also joined other party leaders in welcoming the defectors into the APC and urged them to work with existing members for the development of the party.

The reception for the decampees underscored the APC’s efforts to expand its grassroots structure in the local government, as more members of the opposition party continue to announce their defection to the ruling party.

The latest defection comes ahead of the 2027 general elections and adds to the political realignment taking place across Kwara State as the major political parties intensify efforts to consolidate their grassroots support.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending