Connect with us

Politics

Fresh blow for ADC as state congresses stall

Published

on

The leadership crisis rocking the African Democratic Congress shows no sign of abating as internal wrangling and legal hurdles have stalled the state congresses scheduled for Saturday, April 11, 2026.

The crisis, which has since fragmented the party into three camps led by former Senate President David Mark, Nafiu Gombe and a bloc spearheaded by some state ADC chairmen, led to the recent de-recognition of the Mark-led National Working Committee by the Independent National Electoral Commission.

While some states have announced the suspension of their congresses, a few states have vowed to proceed with the election ahead of the party’s convention.

On Thursday, a faction led by Gombe stormed the INEC headquarters in Abuja, demanding formal recognition.

Gombe, accompanied by a Rep member from Kogi State, Leke Abejide, and hundreds of supporters, accused the David Mark-led leadership of attempting to hijack the party’s leadership in defiance of its constitution and internal processes.

Addressing officials of the electoral body during the protest, Gombe insisted that due process must be followed in resolving the leadership dispute.

He said, “We are here to urge INEC to follow due process. You cannot come to the ADC through the window and expect to overturn the owners of the ADC. As democrats, we don’t want any moneybags to come and destroy democracy. The ADC is for all Nigerians from wards, states, to the national level.”

Also speaking, Abejide called on the commission to resist what he described as an attempted takeover of the party, stressing that the ADC constitution clearly outlines eligibility requirements for leadership positions.

“We are here to urge INEC to do the right thing and rescue democracy from the hands of usurpers. How do you come to a party and attempt to hijack the leadership on the same day? Which political platform is that done?

“The party constitution is clear about this. You have to spend at least two years in the ADC as an active member before you can aspire for any position. The commission has not erred. These people are hijackers, and INEC must follow through on reverting to status quo ante bellum by recognising Nafiu Bala Gombe as the national chairman of the party,” he said.

Similarly, the ADC Director of Youths and Mobilisation, Mohammed Sahad, commended INEC for complying with a court order, but urged the commission to go further by affirming Gombe’s leadership.

“INEC has not erred in any way. In fact, we commend the commission for obeying the court order. But they need to recognise Nafiu Bala Gombe as the authentic national chairman of the ADC. INEC needs to do the right thing and do it now. That is why we are here,” he said.

Responding on behalf of the commission, INEC National Commissioner, Abdullahi Abdu Zuru, assured the protesters that their concerns would be reviewed.

“I am here on behalf of the chairman, and I believe INEC, as a commission, will look at your letter and give you feedback. Thank you for being orderly with your protest,” he said.

The protest comes barely 24 hours after a rival faction of the party, led by former Senate President David Mark, staged a large demonstration in Abuja under the banner of #OccupyINEC, accusing the electoral body of actions they claimed undermined democracy and the party’s internal leadership structure.

The back-to-back protests underscore the deepening rift within the ADC, raising concerns over the party’s stability ahead of future electoral contests.

Congresses halted in states

The protracted crisis rocking the Adamawa state chapter of the ADC has taken another dimension, as a Yola High Court has stopped the party from going ahead with its planned congresses.

Justice Ahmed Isa, who presided over the case, ordered the suspension of the congresses slated for Thursday until the determination of the case. The court subsequently adjourned the case to April 15, 2026, for continuation of the hearing.

The embattled ADC chairman in the State, Shehu Yohanna, had approached the court, seeking to stop the congresses due to alleged exclusion from the process.

Yohanna filed the suit against Sadiq Dasin, the state chairman of the transition committee. When The PUNCH contacted the North East Vice Chairman of the party and former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Mr Babachir Lawal, he denied knowledge of the court ruling.

“I’m in Abuja, so I don’t know about the case. Go and ask those who were in court today. I don’t know anything about the court case, “ he said.

In Anambra, the state congresses would also not be held. The party chairman, Patrick Obianyo, disclosed that the party has suspended the proposed congresses until further notice.

Obianyo said the party’s decision underscores its unwavering commitment to the rule of law, due process, and respect for judicial authority.

He, therefore, called on all party members and stakeholders to remain calm, law-abiding, and peaceful throughout this period.

He also informed the INEC not to recognise anything done by those parading themselves as ADC leaders in the state.

“The African Democratic Congress, the Anambra State chapter, has announced the immediate suspension of all planned and proposed congresses across the state, until further notice.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the tenure of the current ADC Executive Committee in Anambra State, as well as in other states, remains constitutionally valid and duly recognised by INEC.

“Consequently, the general public is strongly advised to disregard any directives, announcements, or actions from unauthorised individuals falsely parading themselves as party leaders.

“The party will duly communicate new dates for congresses and conventions following the conclusion of ongoing national consultations and meetings.’’

See also  PHOTOS: Branded panties distributed in Kano as campaign materials

Similarly, the Ondo ADC has announced the suspension of its earlier scheduled Congresses following the re-recognition of the national leadership of the party.

The party had earlier scheduled to hold its ward, local government and state congresses this month, but disclosed that the exercises had been suspended.

This was contained in a statement made available to our correspondent by the state chairman of the party, Mr Wole Ademoyegun.

It said the suspension was in line with the directive of the INEC, which asked the party to maintain the status quo ante bellum.

“We reaffirm our unwavering respect for INEC as the constitutionally constituted regulatory authority for political parties and our firm commitment to due process and institutional order.

“Accordingly, all members and stakeholders of the party are hereby enjoined to remain calm, maintain unity, and exercise the highest level of discipline during this period.

“The party strongly advises against any form of activity that may contravene the directive of INEC or disrupt the peace and order within the party.”

Also, the Zamfara ADC said that it might not continue with the congresses as earlier planned.

The state chairman of the party, Alhaji Kabiru Garba, said the party has yet to make any preparations with regard to the congresses.

In a telephone interview with The PUNCH, Garba said, “Being the state chairman of ADC in Zamfara, I am telling you that I don’t know anything about the forthcoming congresses. Nobody has briefed me on the level of preparedness regarding the congresses. As such, I have no idea whether the exercises will hold or not.”

Relatedly, the ADC in Niger State has suspended its planned congresses across all 25 local government areas until further notice.

State chairman Musa Hassan said the decision, conveyed in a Wednesday statement, was to uphold the rule of law, due process, and judicial authority.

He warned that the INEC would not recognise any congress conducted by unauthorised committees and urged the public to disregard directives from individuals posing as party leaders. A new date will be announced after ongoing consultations.

Meanwhile, the crisis rocking the Kaduna State chapter of the party escalated on Wednesday as rival groups issued conflicting positions on the conduct of the party’s ward, local government and state congresses.

While one faction announced the postponement of the exercise to May, another dismissed the decision as unauthorised, insisting that any such move lacked constitutional backing and would not be recognised.

In a statement dated April 6, 2026, a group led by the State Organising Secretary, Adamu Bello, said the congresses earlier scheduled to begin on April 7 had been postponed following a surge in defections into the party.

The statement, co-signed by the Publicity Secretary, Idris Musa, explained that the postponement was to accommodate new entrants and ensure inclusivity.

“This decision follows a significant influx of defectors from various parties, including the PDP, APC, NNPP and Labour Party,” the statement read.

“The party leadership believes conducting the congress at this time would be premature and may not reflect the true representation of the party’s growing strength.”

It added that the congresses had been rescheduled to the first week of May, noting that the national leadership had been informed.

However, another faction rejected the announcement, describing it as misleading and lacking official authorisation.

In a disclaimer issued by the factional State Organising Secretary, Ibrahim Musa, the group denied claims that the INEC had stopped the congresses.

“The attention of the ADC has been drawn to a purported publication claiming that INEC has stopped the party from conducting its leadership elections. This claim is false and misleading,” the statement read.

It added that those behind the publication were not recognised spokespersons of the party and did not represent its official position.

“This appears to be a deliberate attempt to misinform party members and create confusion,” the statement added, warning that action could be taken against those involved.

Weighing in on the development, the factional chairman of the party in the state, Ahmed Tijjani Mustapha, insisted that only the state executive committee had the authority to organise congresses.

“They are stakeholders of the party, but the conduct of congresses is clearly stipulated in our constitution,” he said.

“It is the mandate of the state executive committee to decide when and how congresses will be held.”

In Osun, the ADC State Chairman, Charles Omidiji, has said its members will not participate in the forthcoming state congress of the party. He, however, said a faction within the party in the state called the Omoluabi Progressives planned to hold the congress.

“I have the directive of the national body not to participate in the congress. But a faction in Osun ADC called Omoluabi Progressives is planning to hold the congress. But as Osun State chairman of the party, I am telling you that we are not participating.”

However, the Director of Media of Osun ADC, Seun Abosede, said Omidiji was no longer the chairman of the party in Osun and thus incompetent to speak for the party.

“He can’t speak for Osun ADC. He has joined the Nigeria Democratic Congress. He has been listed on the website of the party as Osun’s protem chairman. Omidiji is no longer in Osun ADC.

“We are proceeding with the congress. On Saturday, we will have our state congress, and thereafter, we will proceed to the national convention. You can check the website of the NDC, Omidiji is listed on its website as Osun protem chairman,” Abosede said.

But the situation is different in Plateau, where the party insisted it is set to proceed with its state congresses scheduled for Saturday.

See also  US strike: Nigeria gave intelligence, approved operation – Tuggar

In an interview with The PUNCH in Jos on Wednesday, the state ADC Chairman, Hannatu Gagara, confirmed that the party will go ahead with the congress, saying, “We have done the screening of delegates at the ward and local Government levels. So, we are proceeding with the state congress on Saturday by the Grace of God.”

Gagara dismissed concerns over the INEC de-recognition, stating, “The electoral body did not say we should stop our congresses. And besides, we contacted INEC this morning about it, and I can tell you they have no problem with what we are doing.”

The National Chief Whip of the ADC, Sabiu Musa, who is also from Plateau state, echoed Gagara’s sentiments, saying, “The party has held its ward and local government congresses in Plateau state, and from the report I got, it was a success. So, the remaining one, which is the state congress, is going to be an affirmation of the current chairman, led by Amb Hannatu Gagara. So, ADC is good to go in Plateau state.”

In the same vein, the  Jigawa State chapter has vowed to proceed with its scheduled ward, local government, and state congresses.

A chieftain and coordinator of the party coalition in the state, Mahmud Gumel, confirmed to our correspondent on Wednesday that the congresses will hold as planned, saying the party is not intimidated by INEC’s actions.

“We will go ahead with our congresses and convention. We have complied with the law by giving INEC the required notice. Whether they attend or not, our processes will continue,” Gumel said.

He expressed concern over what he described as attempts to undermine political pluralism ahead of the 2027 general elections, warning that such actions could weaken Nigeria’s democratic framework and limit the choices available to voters.

In Edo, the party on Thursday held its ward and local government area Congresses across the 192 wards and 18 local government areas to elect new leaders. The party said it was ready for the state Congress fixed for Saturday.

However, the state chairman, Ken Odion, described the congress as null and void, noting that the state chapter will comply with the decision of the INEC.

Odion said going ahead would amount to a futile exercise, which would result in wanton waste of capital and human resources.

He said, “Some people said that they are going ahead, but as a state chairman, I am not going ahead with those activities because when you go ahead, you finish it, and you need to submit it to the body that said you should not go ahead. Where do you want to submit the report?’’

The Kogi ADC has asked party members to disregard the purported suspension of congresses in the state.

This was contained in a statement issued on Wednesday by the publicity secretary of the party, Abdumalik Suleiman.

“The African Democratic Congress, Kogi State chapter, wishes to inform party members, stakeholders, and the general public to disregard the purported suspension of congresses in Kogi State contained in a letter issued by the state’s outgoing Chairman, Mr Kingsley Ogga.”

Suleiman said that “Ogga lacks the constitutional authority to suspend congresses in the state.”

“In issuing that directive, he usurped the powers of the National Working Committee NWC, the only organ of the party vested with the authority to commence or halt electoral processes within the party.”

Uncertainty in Oyo

When asked if the congresses would be held in Oyo, the state publicity secretary, Bimbo Adelowo, said, “In the light of the de-recognition of David Mark-led interim committee of  ADC, a lot of situations have arisen that make the party a political party technically without clear-cut leadership.

“First, I would like to say this: INEC might be wrong in its decision to derecognise the interim NWC of ADC, but the fact that INEC, as a regulatory body, is empowered under law to set rules, whether the rules are just or not, is another case entirely.

“Since INEC has made a pronouncement, definitely everyone should abide by it until otherwise is pronounced by a court of competent jurisdiction.’’

“Our congresses, in view of the above, have been shelved in order not to run foul of the law. But that doesn’t preclude our party from holding our meetings, only that INEC will not monitor any of the meetings,” he explained.

Division in Abia

In a related development, a faction of the party in Abia State has distanced the party from the actions of Don Obinna, saying he lacks the authority to act or speak as the party’s chairman in the state.

The decision was reached in Umuahia on Thursday, where party leaders, including Austine Akobundu, senator representing Abia Central; Uko Nkole and Okey Igwe, among other stakeholders, reviewed the situation in the party and reaffirmed their commitment to due process.

Reading the communiqué on behalf of the caucus, Nkole drew attention to a subsisting order of the Abia State High Court which, through an interim injunction dated December 3, 2025, restrained Obinna from parading himself or acting in any capacity as chairman of the party in the state pending the determination of the case.

The caucus also referenced the findings of the ADC South-East Zonal Disciplinary Committee contained in a report dated September 25, 2025, which clarified the party’s position on Obinna’s conduct and status.

According to the caucus, Obinna’s continued claim to the leadership of the party in Abia State is unlawful and misleading, describing it as a violation of party discipline and contempt of a valid court order. It therefore declared that any meetings, directives, or public engagements conducted by him in the name of the party are null and void.

See also  Obi, Amaechi, Duke differ over insecurity, subsidy ahead of 2027

The caucus reaffirmed Kanu Kanu as the Acting State Chairman of the ADC pending the conduct of the party’s state congresses.

Meanwhile,  Obinna has said the current tenure of the Abia State ward, LGA, and state executives remains in effect.

In a statement on Thursday, Obinna, who still claims to be the substantive state chairman of the party, advised party members, leaders, and stakeholders to “remain calm, stay positive, and promote the constructive message of ADC while refraining from acts that could disturb peace in their areas.”

Mark-led NWC seeks court order against INEC

The David Mark-led NWC, which was sacked by INEC, has approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking orders to compel the electoral body to reverse its decision to delete the party’s top officials from its records.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, follows the removal of the names of Mark, listed as National Chairman, and Rauf Aregbesola, National Secretary, from INEC’s official portal on April 1.

In a motion on notice dated April 7, the embattled chairman, through his counsel, Sulaiman Usman (SAN), prayed the court to issue a mandatory injunction directing the electoral body to immediately restore the names of the party’s National Working Committee members as they existed prior to the dispute.

The application, brought pursuant to Order 26 Rules 1 to 4 of the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2019, as well as under the court’s inherent and equitable jurisdiction, seeks three principal reliefs.

The applicant also sought “an order of mandatory injunction, directing INEC to forthwith restore and maintain records of the names of Senator David Mark as National Chairman and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary, as well as all members of the National Executive Committee.”

In addition, the motion is seeking “an order restraining INEC from tampering with, or otherwise interfering with, the said leadership records of the 1st defendant, recognising or giving effect to any contrary or competing claims, pending the final determination of this suit.”

The application is a direct response to the March 12 judgment of the Court of Appeal in a dispute initiated by a former deputy national chairman of the party, Nafiu Bala Gombe, before Justice James Omotosho Nwite of the Federal High Court.

In a seven-point argument supporting the motion, Usman contended that the appellate court had expressly ordered all parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum, a legal principle referring to the last uncontested state of affairs before litigation commenced.

He argued, “As of Sept. 2, 2025, when this action was instituted, the 2nd defendant (Senator David Mark) was the recognised national chairman of the 1st defendant.

“The said leadership structure had already been constituted. The plaintiff had already resigned his prior office and had no subsisting role within the party.”

The senior advocate further submitted that INEC acted under a misinterpretation of the appellate court’s directive by removing the names of the party’s leadership, thereby creating what he described as a vacuum within the party’s structure.

According to him, the electoral umpire’s decision amounts to a position of non-recognition that is inconsistent with the true intent of the Court of Appeal’s order and capable of undermining the substance of the pending suit.

Usman added, “The law is settled that a mandatory injunction may be granted at an interlocutory stage to restore a party to the position wrongfully altered.

“This is a proper case for the exercise of the equitable jurisdiction of this honourable court.”

In a related application also filed on April 7 but dated April 2, the applicant is seeking an accelerated hearing of the case, citing the urgency and far-reaching implications of the dispute on the party’s operations.

The motion urges the court to abridge the time within which parties are to file and exchange processes and to order a day-to-day hearing until the matter is finally determined.

Justifying the request, the lawyer argued that the suit raises fundamental issues affecting the leadership structure of a registered political party and has broader implications for democratic governance and political participation.

He stated that the Court of Appeal had already directed that the matter be heard expeditiously, warning that the lingering uncertainty over the party’s leadership is hampering its internal administration and political activities.

Usman further noted that the situation could encourage the emergence of parallel structures and conflicting claims within the party if not urgently resolved.

“The continued pendency of the suit is capable of rendering the subject matter nugatory,” he said.

Court records show that the dispute dates back to September 2025, when the trial judge declined an ex parte application filed by Gombe seeking to halt the activities of the Mark-led leadership pending the determination of the suit.

The court, instead, ordered the plaintiff to put all defendants on notice to show cause why the application should not be granted.

Following the development, the Mark-led leadership challenged the jurisdiction of the trial court at the Court of Appeal, which subsequently directed parties to return to the lower court and maintain the status quo ante bellum.

In the substantive suit, Gombe listed the ADC, Mark, Aregbesola, INEC and Ralph Nwosu as the 1st to 5th defendants.

Nwosu, a former national chairman of the party, had earlier stepped down, paving the way for Mark’s emergence as the leader of the party.

Despite the developments, the party’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said on Channel Television recently that the ADC would contest the 2027 general election despite the challenges facing it.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

No quarrel with Soludo, says Peter Obi on Anambra debt

Published

on

Former Anambra State Governor and Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has said he has no disagreement with his successor, Chukwuma Soludo, declaring that he will not seek the governorship of any state again.

Obi made the clarification on Friday while responding to issues that had recently generated public discussion, including the controversy over the financial obligations associated with projects implemented during his tenure as Anambra governor.

The former governor, who said he had remained silent in recent days because he was mourning his late elder brother and friend, Chief Okey Ezeibe, said he was not interested in returning to the governorship, even if the Constitution was amended.

“I wish to assure the public that I have no disagreement with my dear elder brother, Governor Soludo, or with any governor in Nigeria. I am not seeking the office of governor in any state, and I will not seek that position again, even if the Constitution is amended”, he stated.

Obi also appealed to governors to allow presidential candidates and other contestants to campaign freely in their states, irrespective of their political affiliations. He said, “Accordingly, I appeal to governors to support whichever presidential candidate they choose while also permitting and assisting other presidential candidates and contenders for other offices to campaign freely and without interruption in their states. Ultimately, voters should be allowed to determine whom they wish to serve them.”

He added that political actors should focus on the challenges confronting Nigerians rather than engage in distractions.

See also  US lawmakers, Nigerian Reps hold fresh sessions over rising insecurity

“On the Anambra debt question, I have remained silent over the past few days because I have been grieving the loss of my very dear elder brother and friend, Chief Okey Ezeibe. However, the time has come for me to address some of the matters that have occupied public discussion in recent days. I respectfully urge everyone to concentrate on the existential challenges confronting Nigeria and the hardships endured by its citizens, rather than on the needless distractions that have become widespread in our politics.”

His comments came amid a disagreement between the Anambra State Government and Obi over external borrowings associated with projects undertaken during his administration. https://punchng.com/anambra-govt-counters-obi-alleges-n127bn-124m-debt/

The state government had said eight external borrowings linked to projects during Obi’s tenure had a combined contracted value of $123.77m, with $92.35m outstanding as of June 30, 2026, based on figures from the Debt Management Office.

Obi rejected the characterisation of the facilities as “debt owed by Peter Obi”, saying they were primarily World Bank and International Fund for Agricultural Development development programmes negotiated by the Federal Government and accessed by participating states through subsidiary arrangements.

He said the figures being cited should be separated into the amount approved, the amount actually drawn and the balance outstanding when he left office. “The government has combined these distinct categories, added them together, and described the resulting US$123.77 million as ‘loans left by Peter Obi.’ That is an incorrect application of public-sector accounting”, he argued.

Obi further maintained that he did not personally approach any financial institution to borrow funds or issue a bond on behalf of the state. He said, “Regarding the multilateral funding inaccurately described as ‘debt owed by Peter Obi’ in Anambra State, I wish to state unequivocally, as Governor of Anambra State, I did not approach any financial institution to borrow funds or issue a bond on behalf of the state.

See also  Insecurity causes 31 states spend N252bn on security in six months, read details

“Indeed, at his farewell ceremony, the then Director-General of the DMO, Abraham Nwankwo, appointed me chairman and declared that, during his 10 years in office, I was the only state governor who had not approached him for a loan facility.”

He also said his administration left no unpaid salaries, gratuities or pensions, and no verified debts owed to contractors or suppliers. “When I left office, the Anambra State Government owed no unpaid salaries, gratuities, or pensions. Neither did it owe any contractor or supplier who had completed work that the government had verified and certified.”

Obi said the issues surrounding the development financing should be considered in the context of how the facilities were approved, accessed and repaid.

“The eight facilities identified were primarily World Bank and IFAD development programs negotiated by the Federal Government, with participating states receiving access to the funds through subsidiary arrangements. They were not conventional commercial loans that I personally secured during my tenure. This does not suggest that Anambra had no repayment responsibilities; rather, each facility must be examined in light of its approval, effectiveness, drawdown, and repayment record”, he explained.

He also cited Debt Management Office figures for Anambra’s external debt at different points, questioning how the $123.77m figure attributed to his administration was arrived at.

“The clearest contradiction appears in the government’s own figures. It states that the original facilities amounted to approximately US$123.77 million and that US$92.35 million remained outstanding in June 2026. However, the DMO’s published records showed Anambra’s total external debt at approximately US$18 million when I began my tenure in March 2006, about US$30 million in March 2014, when I left office, and approximately US$45.15 million as of 31 December 2014, nine months after my departure.

See also  Why we sent Egusi to space – Dr. Oniosun

“The Anambra State Government must therefore clarify how a state whose recorded external debt was about US$30 million in March 2014 and US$45.15 million in December 2014 could supposedly have inherited US$123.77 million from Peter Obi, who left office in March of that same year”, he concluded.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Moghalu rejects Atiku campaign appointment ahead of 2027 elections

Published

on

A former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Kingsley Moghalu, has rejected his inclusion in the policy team of the African Democratic Congress presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar, for the 2027 election.

Moghalu, in a statement posted on his X handle on Thursday, said he was neither consulted nor asked for his consent before his name was published as a member of Atiku’s campaign policy team.

His reaction came hours after Atiku’s campaign unveiled its Presidential Campaign Council, naming Moghalu among members of its Policy Team.

The team is chaired by economist and banker Mohammed Hayatudeen, with Professor Mohammed Sagagi as deputy chairman.

Atiku Abubakar
FILE: Atiku Abubakar

“I am surprised to see a statement from @atiku and @ADCNig campaign team including my name as a member of former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar’s policy team for the 2027 presidential campaign.

“For the record: I was not consulted and did not give my consent to my name being published as a member of the ADC candidate’s policy team.

“I am NOT, in fact a member of Atiku’s policy team, even unofficially or in any advisory capacity,” Moghalu said.

Moghalu, who was a presidential candidate of the Young Progressives Party in the 2019 election, said he had quit partisan politics in Nigeria in 2022.

“I have quit partisan politics in Nigeria since 2022. I have maintained, and continue to maintain, my non-partisan posture in our country’s national affairs.

“I am not a member or sympathiser of any political party in Nigeria,” he said.

He said his current engagements included serving as president of the Institute for Governance and Economic Transformation, IGET Africa, which he described as a non-partisan public policy think tank and executive education academy, as well as Chief Executive Officer of Sogato Strategies, a geopolitical risk and regulatory strategy advisory firm.

See also  Peter Obi will be alive to contest and lose the 2027 presidential poll - Dave Umahi

Moghalu said his decision to remain outside partisan politics did not mean he was disengaged from national affairs.

“I remain committed to my country, Nigeria and its progress, but such commitment does not have to entail ANY partisan alignment.

“I have adopted the path of statesmanship, not partisanship,” he said.

The clarification follows the unveiling of Atiku’s campaign structure on Thursday, with Kashim Ibrahim-Imam named chairman, former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai as deputy chairman and Senator Austin Akobundu as Director-General and Campaign Manager.

The campaign said its Policy Team would develop policy proposals addressing issues including the cost of living, unemployment, insecurity and declining purchasing power.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Benue PDP faults Alia over LG workers’ attendance register

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party in Benue State has condemned the directive issued by Governor Hyacinth Alia, ordering the 23 local government areas to maintain attendance registers for their workers.

The Benue State Local Government Service Commission, in a letter dated September 24, 2026, and signed by the Permanent Secretary, John Akume, on behalf of the chairman of the commission, had directed all LGAs to maintain daily staff attendance registers across departments.

The circular read, “I am directed to inform you that owing to the directives from His Excellency, the Executive Governor of Benue State, Rev. Dr Hyacinth Alia, all establishments in the state civil service are to keep and maintain attendance registers.

“To this end, all local government councils are directed to comply with the above directive by opening attendance registers for staff across Departments.

“These registers are to be opened and closed by Heads of Departments daily at 8:30 am, as only staff who attain the minimum punctuality of 25 days would be eligible for payment of salaries.”

The permanent secretary advised that all the local government councils must adhere strictly to the directive beginning from  October 1, 2026.

Reacting, the opposition PDP described the directive as “draconian and anti-worker.”

In a statement issued by the party’s state publicity secretary, Bright Antyo and made available to journalists in Makurdi on Thursday, the PDP said the directive negated the judgment of the Supreme Court, which affirmed the financial and administrative autonomy of local governments in Nigeria.

See also  Obasanjo’s role in Obi-Kwankwaso ticket sparks fresh controversy

The PDP statement read, “This directive is not only draconian and anti-worker, but also a direct affront to the spirit and letter of the landmark Supreme Court judgment of July 2024, which affirmed the financial and administrative autonomy of local governments in Nigeria.

“Autonomy means independence. Autonomy means local governments should be free to take decisions concerning their administration, personnel management and internal operations without interference from the state government.

“A governor who genuinely believes in local government autonomy cannot simultaneously act as a supervisor, inspector, disciplinarian and paymaster of local government employees.”

The major opposition party in the state stated that the directive had exposed the contradiction between the governor’s public rhetoric and the reality on the ground.

“While the administration continues to celebrate supposed local government autonomy in public speeches, its actions reveal a desperate determination to retain control over affairs of the 23 councils through intimidation and despotic directives.

“Even more disturbing is the threat that workers who fail to meet a prescribed attendance requirement would be denied salaries.

“The authority to determine staff attendance, discipline workers and administer payroll belongs to the appropriate local government authorities, not the Governor’s Office or agencies acting on its behalf.

“Attempting to centralise such powers undermines the constitutional status of Local Governments and reduces elected council officials to mere spectators in the administration of their councils.”

The opposition PDP asked if the governor had been receiving directives from the Federal Government on how to administer the state.

The PDP said that with the directive, the third tier of government had been reduced to an appendage of the governor.

See also  Insecurity causes 31 states spend N252bn on security in six months, read details

“They neither possess the practical freedom nor the financial capacity to award contracts independently.

“The governor runs the councils as extensions of his office, while any local government chairman who dares to complain or assert independence is swiftly suspended and eventually forced out of office,” the statement concluded.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending