Connect with us

Lifestyle

Read how Student commits suicide after Oyo police detention over N8,000 debt

Published

on

When Al-Amin Mohammed returned home from the Agodi Custodial Centre in Ibadan, Oyo State, on September 14, his family thought the worst was over.

The 30-year-old aluminium fixer and student of a polytechnic in Kwara State had spent days in police detention and prison custody following a dispute that began with an alleged N8,000 debt.

His parents had stood as sureties to perfect his bail.

He was finally home and free.

But his mother, Simiat Mohammed, said the son who returned to the family was not the same man who had left days earlier.

He barely ate. He withdrew from people. Again and again, she said, Al-Amin complained about the humiliation of being detained, taken to court and remanded in prison over an allegation he insisted was untrue.

“He kept saying that they wanted to tarnish his image because he came from a poor family and that he was sent to prison for a crime he did not commit,” the grieving mother told Saturday PUNCH amid tears.

Three days after his release, tragedy struck.

On September 17, Al-Amin ingested rat poison at his residence in Ibadan.

Before then, according to his family, he recorded a voice note expressing frustration and saying what would become his final words to his mother.

“He said the frustration was too much and asked his siblings to take care of me. He mentioned my name and apologised, telling me not to be angry with him,” Simiat recalled.

The family rushed him from one hospital to another in a desperate attempt to save his life.

His father, Habeeb Mohammed, said three hospitals rejected him before the family eventually got to the University College Hospital, Ibadan.

“We were asked to make some payments before he could be attended to. After we paid, the doctor came and told us that he was dead,” he said.

For the Mohammed family, the death brought a devastating end to a chain of events that they say should never have gone beyond a minor disagreement.

How N8,000 debt became police case

According to Simiat, her son had borrowed N23,000 from a Point-of-Sale operator identified simply as Kazeem.

Al-Amin had repaid N15,000, leaving a balance of N8,000.

But a disagreement subsequently broke out, during which Kazeem allegedly seized Al-Amin’s mobile phone over the unpaid balance.

The 30-year-old later returned to retrieve his phone, leading to a struggle.

His mother said the confrontation was minor, but it set off events that eventually took her son through vigilante detention, a police cell, a courtroom and prison custody.

After the altercation, Al-Amin was allegedly detained overnight by a vigilante said to be the father of one of Kazeem’s employees.

The following day, September 9, he was allegedly handed over to officers at the Sanyo Divisional Police Station in Ibadan.

Simiat said she received a call the next day asking her to come to the station.

Like many mothers visiting a detained child, she went there carrying food.

“When I got to the station, I went with food for my son, but they did not allow me to give it to him. After some time, they brought him out of the cell and I spoke with him,” she said.

During that brief encounter, Al-Amin maintained his innocence over another allegation that had entered the dispute that he damaged a mobile phone belonging to Kazeem.

“He told me that he did not touch the phone, let alone spoil it. He said the only money he owed Kazeem was N8,000 and that he went to retrieve his phone after it had been seized, which led to the struggle,” she added.

See also  ONE DAY, WORMS WILL NOT CARE HOW MUCH MONEY YOU HAD, AND THE GRAVE WILL NOT CARE HOW POWERFUL YOU WERE!

‘They said they would jail him’

What Simiat expected would be resolved as a dispute between two young men allegedly took a more serious turn.

She claimed that the Investigating Police Officer, identified as Adekeye, insisted that Al-Amin would be prosecuted despite the family’s appeals for a settlement.

According to her, the family was asked to provide N100,000 for bail and another N70,000 for the damaged phone.

“When Kazeem came to the station, I pleaded with him that we should settle the matter. I also pleaded with the DCO, but he later sent me out of his office.

“The IPO, Adekeye, also said she would ensure that my son was jailed. There was even a police officer pleading on our behalf,” she alleged.

The deceased’s father, Habeeb, gave a similar account.

He alleged that the matter was escalated because the complainant’s father was known to the Divisional Crime Officer.

“When I got there, I begged the DCO that the matter could be settled amicably. But because the father of the complainant was his friend, he said he would deal with my son and send him to prison,” he stated.

The family further alleged that Al-Amin complained of harsh treatment while in detention and said he was pressured to admit that he damaged the phone.

Saturday PUNCH could not independently verify those allegations.

From police cell to prison

On September 10, the family said Al-Amin was taken to court in the Mapo area of Ibadan.

His mother claimed nobody informed the family beforehand.

They only learnt that he had been taken to court after receiving a telephone call.

At the court, the family encountered a lawyer identified as Boluwatife, who, according to Simiat, offered to represent Al-Amin free of charge after hearing about the case.

The court granted him bail in the sum of N100,000 with two sureties in like sum.

But freedom did not come immediately.

Pending the perfection of his bail conditions, Al-Amin was taken to the Agodi Custodial Centre.

For four days, his parents worked to secure his release.

Eventually, Simiat and Habeeb stood as sureties, and their son walked out of custody on September 14.

The family had won his freedom, but his mother said something appeared to have changed.

‘He stopped eating’

At home, Al-Amin became withdrawn.

The young man who combined aluminium work with his studies and helped support his family stopped eating and talking to people.

His thoughts, the mother said, repeatedly returned to the police station and prison.

He felt humiliated by the experience and worried that his reputation had been destroyed.

Three days after his release, Al-Amin allegedly took the substance that claimed his life.

‘He was our shining light’

Al-Amin’s elder sister, Adenike, said the tragedy deprived the family of one of its major sources of support.

She described him as hardworking and ambitious a young man who earned a living fixing aluminium while pursuing his education.

“He was a hardworking boy. He was working as an aluminium fixer and also going to school. He was the pillar of this family and was taking care of our mother,” she said.

Al-Amin was unmarried and had no child.

“We have lost the shining light of our family,” Adenike added.

See also  One injured in clashes over deposed Osun monarch’s burial rites

A family friend and retired Deputy Superintendent of Police, Isiaka Ayole, said the circumstances surrounding Al-Amin’s arrest, detention and prosecution deserved an independent investigation.

He questioned why the vigilante who allegedly detained the deceased overnight before handing him over to the police was not also investigated.

“This was a simple matter that the police should have helped settle amicably instead of escalating it,” Ayole said.

“I don’t understand the type of policing where somebody is first detained overnight by a vigilante and then handed over to a police officer who is said to be a friend of the complainant’s father.

“The irony is that nothing was said about the person who took the law into his hands. Instead, the person owing N8,000 was taken to court.”

The retired police officer called on the Inspector-General of Police, Tunji Disu, to investigate the officers involved and establish whether there was any abuse of power.

Mother demands answers

For Simiat, however, the questions are more personal.

In just over a week, she watched her son go from an aluminium worker and student to a detainee, a defendant, a prison inmate and, finally, a young man she said became consumed by the stigma of what had happened to him.

The Mohammed family is now appealing to President Bola Tinubu, the IG and the Oyo State Government to investigate the circumstances surrounding Al-Amin’s death.

They want to know whether the dispute was properly handled and whether any police officer abused his authority.

Speaking through tears, Simiat said her family lacked influence or powerful connections but would continue to seek answers.

“Let them investigate what happened to my son. We don’t have anybody except God,” she said.

“We do not want him to die in vain.”

I only wanted my money, not drag any case – Kazeem

Reacting, Kazeem, who operates a phone-charging point and Point-of-Sale business around the Oni-Gaari area of Ayegun, Ibadan, told Saturday PUNCH that he was shocked to learn of Al-Amin’s death.

He insisted that he never intended to pursue the matter beyond recovering his money.

Kazeem explained that sometime last year, Al-Amin withdrew N7,000 from his apprentice, one Maryam, but allegedly failed to transfer the money to her as promised.

“Al-Amin started avoiding the area until Maryam returned to school without informing me about the incident,” he said.

Kazeem said Maryam later told him what happened when she returned from school few months later and asked whether Al-Amin had deposited the money with him.

“She and her sister traced him to his house and he told them he had given the money to me, so they left. Al-Amin later called me and pleaded that he only told Maryam and her sister that he had given me the money so that they would not embarrass him in his house. Later, his grandmother paid the money.”

On the recent incident, Kazeem said he employed another apprentice, one Iya Ajike.

He said he visited the shop on Tuesday, September 8, 2026, for monitoring and account balancing.

He claimed to have met some people pleading with the apprentice to release Al-Amin’s phone.

According to him, Ajike later explained that Al-Amin had carried out a transaction of about N23,000, collected the money and left his phone at the shop, promising to transfer the money after charging the device.

Kazeem said the deceased later returned, collected the phone and transferred N15,000, claiming he had exceeded his transfer limit for the day and would pay the balance the following day.

See also  Heal From Your Past So You Don’t Punish a Good Person for Someone Else’s Pain

He said when the balance was not paid, Al-Amin allegedly began avoiding the apprentice.

Kazeem explained that Ajike eventually traced him to a location where she found him sleeping with the phone beside him, picked up the device and returned to the shop.

He said Al-Amin later arrived with some friends to plead for the release of the phone, an encounter he witnessed.

According to Kazeem, he insisted that Al-Amin pay the outstanding money before the phone would be released.

He said the matter was later taken up by the landlord association after the deceased indicated that he would pay.

Kazeem said on Wednesday night, he was informed of an altercation involving his apprentice and Al-Amin.

“Iya Ajike called me around 10pm that Al-Amin had come to her house around 9pm that he wanted to collect his phone, that someone had sent money to him and he wanted to transfer the debt to her.

“Iya Ajike told me that she told Al Amin that the phone is in the shop and it is late already that he should come back the following day, but Al Amin said he wanted his phone that night. He tried to snatch an Airtel-branded phone we use for our business, which she was using as a torchlight.

“The phone fell down during the struggle and its screen was damaged,” he said.

Kazeem said the landlord association that night asked the parties to return the following morning to resolve the matter.

“In the morning, I was there; we couldn’t resolve the matter because other people also came forward with similar complaints against Al-Amin that he underpayed them whenever he came to withdraw money.”

He said the matter was subsequently referred to a vigilante group, which directed the parties to the Sanyo Police Station after it could not resolve the dispute.

“When we got to the station, the only thing I told the police was that I wanted Al-Amin to take responsibility for the damaged phone and how he was going to repair it. But Al-Amin denied responsibility for the damage, saying he was not responsible for the damaged phone.”

“So, the police detained him that day and asked us to come the following day. They took him to where the charge was read to him and he pleaded not guilty.”

He said the magistrate subsequently ordered that Al-Amin be remanded and adjourned the case until October 10.

Kazeem said he only learnt on Thursday that Al-Amin had been released on bail.

He maintained that he never intended to drag the matter into a legal dispute, adding that his primary concern was to recover the money owed to him.

“In fact, I was discussing with my lawyer that the money used for his bail, had they agreed at the station, this matter would not have got to court. The money I have spent on the case is more than the amount owed,” Kazeem said.

When contacted, the Public Relations Officer of the Oyo State Police Command, Ayanlade Olayinka, said he was not aware of the incident.

A subsequent message sent to him via WhatsApp had not been responded to as of the time of filing this report.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

RESPECT IS RECIPROCAL: YOU CANNOT DEMAND WHAT YOU REFUSE TO GIVE

Published

on

Why do some people demand respect from everyone while treating others with disrespect?**

There is something deeply wrong with a society where people believe that respect should flow in only one direction.

Some people want to be respected because they are older, wealthier, more educated, more influential or occupy positions of authority. Yet they feel entitled to insult, intimidate, humiliate and belittle those they consider beneath them.

They want people to bow before them, but they refuse to treat others with dignity.

They want their opinions respected, but they dismiss the opinions of others.

They demand loyalty, but offer betrayal. They demand kindness, but practise cruelty. They expect understanding, but show little consideration for anyone else’s feelings.

**Is that respect, or simply an abuse of power?**

## Respect is not determined by wealth, age or status

Having money does not make you more human than someone who is struggling financially.

Being a boss does not give you the right to humiliate your employees.

Being a parent does not mean your children have no feelings or deserve no consideration.

Being older does not automatically make every decision you make right.

And holding a position of authority does not give you permission to treat people as though they have no value.

True respect is reflected in your character, behaviour and treatment of other people.

## Stop confusing fear with respect

This is where many people get it wrong.

Some people believe that because others remain silent around them, they are respected.

See also  I am more knowledgeable than most graduates — MC Oluomo

But silence is not always respect.

Sometimes people are simply afraid of your anger, your influence, your financial power or the consequences of disagreeing with you.

You may command obedience through intimidation, but you cannot force genuine admiration.

**People may fear your power without respecting your character.**

## Respect begins with how you treat people

If you want people to respect you, start by examining how you treat them.

Respect the poor. Respect the vulnerable. Respect people who cannot offer you anything in return.

Respect those who disagree with you. Respect people’s boundaries. Respect their dignity, even when you have more money, authority or influence than they do.

You do not have to agree with everyone, but disagreement should never become an excuse for humiliation.

Respect does not mean tolerating abuse or surrendering your boundaries. It means recognising that every human being deserves basic dignity.

## The question we must all answer

Before demanding respect from others, take a moment to examine yourself.

Are you the kind of person who gives the respect you constantly demand?

Do you treat your domestic workers, employees, relatives, neighbours and strangers with the same dignity you expect from those around you?

Or do you believe respect is something other people owe you simply because of who you are?

**Remember: Respect is reciprocal. You cannot continuously disrespect people and expect genuine respect in return.**

### NEWSBREAK365 FINAL THOUGHT

The true measure of a person’s greatness is not how many people bow before them, but how many people they treat with dignity.

See also  Your Life Is Not a Committee Meeting: Learn to Think for Yourself

**Never demand from others what you are unwilling to give.**

—

**JOIN THE CONVERSATION**

Do you believe respect should be given automatically, or should it be earned through character and behaviour?

Can someone genuinely demand respect while constantly disrespecting others?

Share your thoughts. Your opinion matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Informing, Challenging Perspectives and Inspiring Conversations.*

#RespectIsReciprocal #MutualRespect #HumanDignity #CharacterMatters #LifeLessons #SocialValues #Newsbreak365

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

YOUR WEALTH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO OPPRESS THE POOR: STOP EXPLOITING THOSE WHO HAVE LESS THAN YOU

Published

on

Having money does not make you superior. Having power does not give you the right to intimidate others. And being in a position of authority does not make you the owner of another person’s dignity.

There is something deeply troubling about a society where some people believe that having money, connections, influence or authority gives them permission to treat less privileged people like they are worthless.

Some wealthy individuals look down on the poor. Some employers intimidate their workers because they know those workers depend on their salaries to survive. Some people in positions of authority exploit the vulnerability of those who cannot afford to challenge them.

Others use their financial advantage to humiliate, manipulate and silence people who have fewer opportunities.

But let us ask an important question: **When did having more become a licence to mistreat those who have less?**

## THE POOR ARE HUMAN BEINGS, NOT YOUR PUNCHING BAGS!

Being poor does not mean someone deserves humiliation.

A person struggling financially still deserves respect. Someone working for you is not your slave. A person who cannot afford to challenge your decisions is not someone you have the right to exploit.

Whether someone is a cleaner, security guard, domestic worker, factory employee, labourer, driver or street vendor, their dignity matters.

You may have the money, but they have feelings. You may have influence, but they have families to feed. You may have power, but they deserve justice.

Never confuse someone’s inability to fight back with permission to mistreat them.

See also  ONE DAY, WORMS WILL NOT CARE HOW MUCH MONEY YOU HAD, AND THE GRAVE WILL NOT CARE HOW POWERFUL YOU WERE!

## WEALTH SHOULD BUILD PEOPLE, NOT DESTROY THEM

What is the purpose of becoming wealthy if your success comes at the expense of other people’s suffering?

Why intimidate an employee who is already struggling to survive? Why refuse to pay someone what they have legitimately earned? Why use your position to frustrate someone simply because you know they cannot afford to challenge you?

True success should create opportunities, encourage fairness and improve lives.

Pay people fairly. Respect their contributions. Treat workers with dignity. Help vulnerable people when you can.

You do not have to become poor to show compassion to the poor.

## REMEMBER: LIFE CAN CHANGE

The person you humiliate today may not remain in that position forever.

Financial circumstances can change. Positions can change. Businesses can collapse. Opportunities can disappear. The person who appears powerless today may become successful tomorrow.

Nobody knows everything tomorrow holds.

That is why humility matters.

Do not allow your present success to make you arrogant. Do not allow your wealth to destroy your humanity.

## THE MESSAGE IS SIMPLE

If you have more than others, remember that your advantage comes with an opportunity to make a positive difference.

Stop exploiting the poor. Stop intimidating vulnerable people. Stop using money and authority to silence those who have less.

**Be wealthy, but remain humane. Be powerful, but remain humble. Be successful, but never lose your conscience.**

Because at the end of the day, your bank balance may reveal how much money you have, but your treatment of other human beings reveals your character.

See also  Ọmọ n'Ọba n'Ẹdo Uku Akpolokpolo, Oba Akenzua II (1899–1978): The 37th Oba of Benin

**LET’S TALK:**

Why do some people become wealthy and powerful only to use their position to intimidate, exploit and oppress those who are less privileged?

Is it greed, arrogance, lack of compassion or a society that has normalised the abuse of power?

What is your opinion?

Share this article. Someone needs to hear this message.

#Newsbreak365 #HumanityFirst #RespectThePoor #StopOppression #StopExploitation #WealthAndCharacter #SocialJustice #Compassion

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Mohbad Family demands identity of US lab for DNA test

Published

on

The family of late singer Ilerioluwa Aloba, popularly known as Mohbad, has demanded the disclosure of the identity of a United States laboratory expected to conduct a DNA test to determine the paternity of Liam, the singer’s son.

The family also called for the postponement of the examination scheduled for Saturday, October 31, at the Mainland General Hospital/IDH, Yaba, Lagos, pending clarification of its concerns over transparency and compliance with a court order.

In a statement signed by the family head, Samuel Aloba, and sent to PUNCH Metro on Thursday, the family said it was concerned about arrangements for the tissue-based DNA examination, particularly reports that samples would be collected in Lagos and sent to a laboratory in the US for analysis.

The family said it wanted clarification on whether the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre, which it claimed was designated by a court order issued on May 5, 2026, would conduct the examination or merely collect and dispatch the samples abroad.

“This raises a fundamental question that must be answered before the exercise proceeds: Is the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre itself going to conduct the examination contemplated by the court, or is it merely going to collect and dispatch samples to another laboratory?

“The distinction is material. Where a court has directed that a scientific examination be conducted at a particular institution, the parties are entitled to clarity regarding the manner in which that directive will be implemented.

“If the designated centre intends to rely on a foreign laboratory to conduct the analysis, the arrangement should be explained and, where necessary, presented to the court for clarification,” the statement read.

See also  One injured in clashes over deposed Osun monarch’s burial rites

The family said no institution or party should unilaterally substitute a materially different arrangement for one contemplated by a subsisting court order without appropriate judicial clarification.

The family also demanded the full name and address of the proposed overseas laboratory, evidence of its accreditation and technical competence, details of the testing procedure, and documentation showing how the samples would be collected, labelled, preserved, transported and examined.

It further requested a mechanism to verify that the samples collected in Lagos were the same ones received and analysed by the foreign laboratory.

The statement added, “The family has been informed that the identity of the proposed overseas laboratory may be disclosed only to the court. While the family recognises the importance of protecting legitimate confidential information, confidentiality cannot be permitted to defeat the basic requirements of transparency, accountability and meaningful verification in a process whose outcome may have far-reaching legal and personal consequences.”

The family said its concerns were not an attempt to frustrate the judicial process or prevent a scientifically valid examination but to ensure that the outcome could withstand independent scrutiny.

It expressed apprehension about possible interference, mishandling or manipulation of the process if adequate safeguards were not established before the examination.

However, the family clarified that it was not claiming that the proposed test had already been compromised or that manipulation had been established.

“In a matter as sensitive as Mohbad’s DNA, the result must not merely be announced; it must be demonstrably reliable. The integrity of the process must be capable of independent verification, from the point of sample collection to the final laboratory report,” it said.

See also  I am more knowledgeable than most graduates — MC Oluomo

The family also linked its concerns to questions it had previously raised about the handling of biological samples during the post-mortem examination conducted in connection with Mohbad’s death.

It questioned the role of the pathologist involved in sample collection during the coroner’s inquest.

The family further claimed that information it received from its enquiries indicated that the laboratory to which samples from the earlier process were purportedly sent had not received them or any specimen registered in the name of Ilerioluwa Promise Aloba.

It stressed, however, that the assertions represented its account of the matter and required clarification and verification, adding that they were not findings of a court or independently established proof of wrongdoing by any individual or institution.

The family maintained that it supported a credible DNA examination capable of resolving Liam’s paternity but insisted that the identity of the testing laboratory and the chain of custody of the samples must be clear.

It called on the relevant authorities to address its concerns, provide the necessary information and ensure that the examination complied with the court’s order and accepted forensic procedures.

The family consequently requested the postponement of Saturday’s exercise until the outstanding issues were clarified, adequate notice was given to all parties and their legal representatives, and further directions were obtained from the court where necessary.

It said its objective was not to predetermine the outcome of the examination but to ensure that the eventual result was based on a credible and properly documented process.

The family added that the public interest in establishing the truth should not be undermined by avoidable uncertainty or a lack of transparency.

See also  Heal From Your Past So You Don’t Punish a Good Person for Someone Else’s Pain

Mohbad died at 27 on September 12, 2023. Following his death, the Lagos State Police Command inaugurated a 13-man special investigation team to probe the circumstances surrounding his passing.

Earlier reports in 2024 indicated that Aloba, through legal representatives, filed an application at the coroner’s court in Ikorodu to determine the cause of Mohbad’s death and later demanded a DNA test to resolve the paternity dispute.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending