Connect with us

Lifestyle

Makoko demolition: When economic interest overrides humanity

Published

on

When American missionary and science teacher, Jack Kyle, arrived in the mega slum of Makoko, Lagos in August 2023, I doubt if he ever thought that one day, his love for slum dwellers and the underserved would never find expression in the area, at least not among the tough-skinned ones living on the dirty lagoon at the backyard of the Ebute Meta area of the mega city. Sixty-year-old Kyle, who left his family of five children and lovely wife in Manhattan, Kansas, United States, didn’t settle in Makoko because of his love for the ghetto, but to be able to add positive values to the lives of these strange fellows in their ‘natural habitat’.

Apart from building a ‘house’ that cost about $4,000 in the community for himself and other volunteers, the American missionary, who defied the opposition of family members back home to embark on this treacherous journey, ensured that, from rainwater, he was able to provide clean water for some residents using solar power. He equally had plans for aquaculture and sewage-to-menthane gas, among other utilities, ignored by the relevant authorities.

At a time in the past, I wondered if the throng of willing donors never had any other locations, orphanages and struggling public schools, apart from this waterfront ghetto, where their supports are much needed both in Lagos and beyond. The little contributions of Kyle and several other Nigerians – individuals and organisations – in helping the slum dwellers in Makoko have sadly gone down the lagoon, where the residents and landlords once had their log houses.

Some years back, a few heads of a few organisations truly took the support of their organisations outside Lagos in order to reach out, no matter how little. A financial institution with its headquarters in Lagos ‘adopted’ a private school in Abuja where the organisation pumped in money like water from a big tap. It wasn’t until the school was involved in a big crisis that the undiscerning minds among us knew that the school actually belonged to the Oga Patapata of the organisation which had adopted the school. A few years later, the chairman of the board took a loan of N120bn to buy a Disco that the Goodluck Jonathan government put on sale, and of course, refused to pay back. And you think such an organisation wouldn’t go under?

See also  Operation OAU: Nigeria’s Major Offensive in the Biafran War

Do you equally want me to tell you about the ‘adoption’ of the private school of the late wife of a living former military president, where the Niger State Government paid the salaries and other expenses of the private institution for years before such brazen impunity was discovered? Could it be because the founder of the school had died? Nigerians love to help in wonderful ways, you know! Let’s go back to Makoko for now, please.

Ever since I noticed this curious settlement from the vantage view of the Third Mainland Bridge, I never ceased to wonder if real humans actually lived in those shanties until it became clear that all manners of fishermen – Ijaws, Beninese, Ghanaians, and their families – had their abode in the Makoko floating slum. You will be dead wrong if you believe the massive ghetto housed fishermen alone. There were schools, a big orphanage, churches, and others, mostly established by private individuals, charitable groups, corporate entities and organisations.

While the location was conducive for the occupation of the residents and providing contents for local and visiting bloggers, it had long been an eyesore. So, the end of this kingdom, if it hadn’t been foretold by some of our self-styled prophets, had been long in coming. The inevitable end came in January courtesy of its demolition by the Lagos State Government, which is not in any way new to demolitions and land reclamation by the way.

In some other parts of the world, pets (and other animals) almost have the same right to life and decent living as their human owners. Imagine driving on a highway (not Nigerian highway o), and you are warned of ‘deer crossing, apply caution’! God helps you if you are unfortunate enough to run into any deer. Imprisonment or deportation beckons or both, depending on your immigration status. In broad daylight, some squirrels deliberately torment your imagination as they playfully jump from one tree branch to another and sometimes take over a small field by your residence. May God deliver you from those deadly thoughts you are entertaining at the moment – in case you are thinking of breaching their ‘animal’ rights.

In our dear country, however, the case is different for a simple reason. We tend to act before we think about the consequences, no matter how fatal the outcome may be. Some of the reactions the Makoko demolition has attracted may sound political, especially from those who seek to reap political capital from this and other sad episodes. The underbelly of this demolition is that we have collectively lost our sense of humanity, not that we have ever prioritised our lives and our living at any time before now.

See also  Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe: The Unseen Statesman Who Chose Unity Over Power

It may interest you to know that Makoko isn’t the first slum to be demolished with the same sense of insensitive logic. During the military era, the Maroko slum (now Lekki) was levelled on the orders of then-Col. Raji Rasaki, the military administrator, who acted with ruthless alacrity in 1990. In July 2012, thousands of residents were displaced when a part of the Makoko ghetto was turned upside down. In March 2016, no fewer than 3,000 were sacked in Mosafejo, Ajegunle, allegedly on short notice.

Otodo Gbame, a Lekki waterfront ghetto, suffered the same fate between November 2016 and April 2017, where 30,000 were said to have been evicted, and the shanties housing them were demolished. There were claims that no fewer than 11 lives were lost. Ilubinrin, a neighbourhood of Obalende/Osborne, Ikoyi, wasn’t spared the same year from the reclamation of more land. Ilaje Otumara fell in March 2025, while the Itesiwaju Ajumoni in Oworonshoki followed suit in October, drawing a massive outcry and protests.

Uncle, are you saying the government should have left those squalid settlements to thrive side-by-side with our much-desired megacity, especially when the Makoko slum, which is the focus here, is expectedly illegal in every sense? Not at all! I was taught as far back as my secondary school days that the government holds power in trust for the people, and the same government has a responsibility to protect and provide social services for the people who put them in power.

It then presupposes that the government of the day must ensure that, apart from ensuring that it protects its citizens from any harm under whatever circumstances, adds value to their living standards and must equally incorporate their interests into governance. With the manner in which the Lagos State Government has dispatched these illegal slum residents of Makoko, I bet my social studies teachers might need to revisit their notes or question their own teachers if they are still alive to take their angry questions.

See also  Divorced mother shares benefits she's enjoying now that she did not enjoy when she was married

I happen to be one of the apolitical Nigerians who have a lot of good words for the Lagos State Government in terms of its forward-looking development strides, no-delay project execution and its consistent security arrangements that have ensured that the state can live in relative peace, especially when compared to other states. But may I ask when it becomes a fashion for a supposedly progressive and responsive government to throw out people and their families into the lagoon, demolish their shelters and their minimal facilities provided by private individuals and groups without any safety valve?

I’m sure you may like to ask why the government should help these distressed families to settle down, even in temporary camps, till they find their feet again. They are human beings created in the image of God as those in power. They are citizens of this great nation (I know some of them are from Ghana, Togo and the Benin Republic) who deserve to be protected and have a right to decent living so that they can put the pieces of their lives together. There are children in ghetto schools and orphanages who also aspire to rise in life and deliver their families from the slum and the stranglehold of poverty. In what ways are their interests protected or considered in these mindless demolitions?

You may equally like to find out how the few lucky ones displaced by previous demolitions have fared in their much-trumpeted new settlements in Jakande (Ajah) and Ikorodu, which are pitiably drops in the ocean? It is no longer news that the state government is pressed for land in all areas, having to contend with the lagoon, the ocean and Ogun State on all sides. These boundaries should not be an excuse to allow economic and political banditry to override our sense of humanity, as if blood does not flow in the veins of our leaders. So, happy land reclamation in pursuit of our megacity!

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

Catholic bishops’ inconvenient truth

Published

on

Politics and religion often conflate into a toxic brew. So, it is with the storm over John Onaiyekan’s comments after the recent meeting between President Bola Tinubu and the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria. As the waves billow and swell, the encounter opens a window into the tremors in government rather than the cardinal’s intentions.

Instead of treating the bishops’ observations as sincere moral feedback from a respected institution, some of the administration’s vocal defenders responded with personal attacks, accusing the cardinal of partisanship and abuse of clerical privilege.

That reaction was unfortunate and avoidable.

No elected government claiming democratic credentials should treat independent criticism as hostility.

Yet the ferocious responses from the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike; the President’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala; and the SSA on Media, Temitope Ajayi, suggested Onaiyekan had committed a grave offence by saying the bishops told the President Nigeria was “bleeding,” that poverty was worsening, and many were struggling under economic reforms.

The cardinal’s fault was not fabricating facts but speaking publicly about an uncomfortable conversation.

He said the President disagreed, insisting the economy was improving and reforms were laying the foundation for recovery.

The bishops, he said, neither expected agreement nor sought to embarrass the President; they were discharging a moral duty to tell him what many Nigerians could not.

That should have ended the matter. Instead, critics turned a healthy exchange into a public quarrel. Bwala questioned the cardinal’s neutrality, alleging the church supported Peter Obi in 2023.

Ajayi dismissed the bishops as offering only one perspective. Wike argued that having taken sides in a past election disqualified the cardinal from impartiality and faulted the bishops for questioning INEC’s neutrality ahead of 2027 without stronger proof.

These points merit consideration. Religious leaders, like journalists and civil society actors, should aim for fairness as credibility rests on intellectual honesty. Achievements by government should be acknowledged. But fairness works both ways.

The administration’s defenders owe Nigerians an honest engagement with the bishops’ substance rather than attempts to discredit the messengers.

Who the cardinal voted for is irrelevant to whether millions of Nigerians are suffering. Hunger and inflation do not check party membership before striking families.

See also  Patrice Lumumba: The Flame That Could Not Be Extinguished

One of the weakest responses to public criticism is to attack motives while avoiding the issues raised. That strategy failed to convince many Nigerians. Therefore, it is no surprise that support for Onaiyekan flowed from across civic space.

The Northern Youth Council said he reflected lived realities; the Middle Belt Forum called the attacks unfair; the Catholic Laity Council defended the church’s pastoral duty to speak for the vulnerable.

Former governor and minister Rotimi Amaechi, himself a Catholic, reminded the Presidency that bishops have every right to criticise governments and urged responses based on evidence, not indignation.

Even Orji Kalu, APC senator and former Abia State governor, threatened to resign from the party if the bishops were insulted, noting their similar interventions across Africa.

The public backlash appears to have prompted moderation. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, reaffirmed the administration’s respect for the Catholic Church and promised deeper consultations.

That is the mature response expected of a confident government, and it should have been the first instinct.

The episode exposes a deeper problem.

With the 2027 elections on the horizon, there is a growing tendency in official circles to interpret every criticism through a partisan lens.

Independent institutions that refuse to sing from the government’s hymn book risk being branded hostile. Such defensiveness serves neither democracy nor good governance.

Onaiyekan’s sharper point was that too many people around the President paint an overly rosy picture of the country. Whether entirely fair, the observation highlights a real danger that administrations insulated by courtiers and loyalists risk mistaking praise for patriotism.

Presidents need more than briefings, official statistics and flattering presentations. They need uncomfortable truths from independent voices including economists, labour unions, journalists, business leaders, traditional rulers and religious organisations.

Governments that refuse to listen lose touch with the people they govern. That is why criticism is not the enemy of reform; silence is.

The Tinubu administration can rightly argue it inherited an economy in deep distress and that difficult choices were necessary. Removing the petrol subsidy and liberalising the foreign exchange market were politically costly but, many economists agree, economically inevitable.

See also  Brigadier Babafemi Ogundipe: The Unseen Statesman Who Chose Unity Over Power

The government has expanded fiscal space for states, created NELFUND, launched youth initiatives, and helped end the destructive cycle of prolonged ASUU strikes. These are notable achievements and deserve acknowledgement.

But governments are judged by citizens’ lived realities, not only by economic theory or improving macro indicators.

Foreign reserves have strengthened to $52 billion from about $3 billion, fiscal revenues rose to all-time highs, and the naira exchange rate has stabilised compared with the immediate post-reform shock.

Yet these gains have not delivered meaningful relief for the average Nigerian. Inflation remains punishing at over 15 per cent and above 37 per cent in at least 10 states; food and transport costs are soaring; healthcare and medication are costly; electricity tariffs and rent have escalated; small businesses struggle with high energy costs and expensive credit.

For too many families, over 70 per cent of income is spent on feeding alone. Multidimensional poverty affects 63 per cent of Nigerians, per the World Bank.

The bishops sought to communicate that reality. It cannot be dismissed by citing encouraging macro trends.

The reforms are also incomplete. A parallel foreign-exchange market persists, reflecting distortions and weak confidence.

Oil production remains below projections. Domestic refiners complain of inadequate crude supply even as the government extends Project Gazelle with a new $4.5 billion refinancing, raising concerns about future crude commitments while local refining capacity is planned to double.

External debt keeps rising, increasing exchange-rate exposure and debt-service obligations, which already consume half of revenues.

Terrorism, banditry and kidnapping continue to terrorise large swathes of the country, driving farmers from fertile lands and worsening food inflation.

Official and independent reports indicate that more than 628,000 people have been killed and over 2.2 million abducted since 2023, according to a BusinessDay report in June.

These are measurable national realities, not opposition talking points. Governments need independent voices to speak honestly about them.  No pushback can erase the fact that Nigeria is bleeding.

The Catholic Church has a long history of such moral witness. During military rule, bishops such as Olubunmi Okogie, an Emeritus Cardinal, condemned authoritarianism, corruption and human-rights abuses.

See also  Actress Georgina Onuoha calls for Blessing CEO’s arrest over claims she has cancer

Under democratic governments, the church continued to criticise administrations across the political spectrum over insecurity, governance failures and human suffering. Its loyalty has been to moral principles, not to any party.

Tinubu should not regard himself as uniquely persecuted, nor should his supporters mistake clerical witness for partisan politics.

Religious leaders are, firstly, citizens. They bury terrorism victims, counsel unemployed graduates, comfort widows and feed hungry families. If such leaders cannot speak about poverty, insecurity and governance, democracy becomes a farce.

Political parties are also inconsistent. Many who now defend petrol subsidy removal opposed it when it was proposed under President Goodluck Jonathan. Those who benefited from the freedom to criticise must not deny others the same liberty when roles reverse.

One of the most perilous governance tendencies is believing that criticism weakens government. On the contrary, governments make worse mistakes when they become prisoners of official optimism.

They need independent feedback to test whether policies yield intended outcomes. Economic models and official reports are necessary but insufficient; they must be complemented by honest input from labour, business, academia, the media, civil society and faith leaders. Without it, governments risk governing statistical abstractions rather than human realities.

It is encouraging that the administration now appears to be recalibrating. Akume’s pledge of deeper engagement deserves commendation.

Consultation, not confrontation, marks mature democratic leadership. The Presidency gains nothing by quarrelling with institutions focused on the country’s welfare.

Tinubu has often said he welcomes constructive criticism. He insisted that he sought the job and should not be pitied. This episode is a chance to prove it.

Labelling respected clerics as partisan for voicing uncomfortable truths suggests the administration may lack confidence in the transformative power of its own reforms. That is diminishing.

Nigeria’s problems are too serious for official defensiveness. Reform is a journey requiring constant feedback. The bishops fulfilled their civic and moral duty. The Presidency must perform its constitutional role by listening, not by silencing dissent.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF TRUST IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can survive difficult times, financial struggles, and disagreements—but when trust disappears, the relationship begins to lose its foundation.

When a husband no longer trusts his wife, or a wife no longer trusts her husband, even innocent actions can become suspicious. A simple phone call becomes a question. Coming home late becomes an accusation. A private conversation becomes a source of fear and jealousy.

Lack of trust creates emotional distance.

It produces constant suspicion, arguments, insecurity, resentment, and sometimes secretive behaviour. Instead of feeling safe with each other, couples begin to feel like enemies living under the same roof.

Trust is not built by controlling your spouse, checking their phone every minute, or constantly demanding explanations. Trust is built through honesty, faithfulness, transparency, consistency, and keeping your word.

If trust has been broken, don’t pretend everything is fine. Talk about it. Admit mistakes. Forgive where possible. Set healthy boundaries. And be willing to rebuild what has been damaged.

Remember: love may bring two people together, but trust helps keep them together.

💔 Don’t allow suspicion to destroy what communication and honesty can repair.

BUILD TRUST. BE FAITHFUL. BE HONEST. PROTECT YOUR MARRIAGE.

“Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour.”
— Ephesians 4:25 (KJV)

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Operation OAU: Nigeria’s Major Offensive in the Biafran War
Continue Reading

Lifestyle

LACK OF OPENNESS IN MARRIAGE

Published

on

A marriage can look beautiful on the outside and still be struggling on the inside when there is no openness between husband and wife.

When couples stop communicating honestly, keep secrets, hide their feelings, or are afraid to discuss important issues, emotional distance begins to grow. What starts as “I don’t want to cause a problem” can eventually become mistrust, resentment, loneliness, and constant misunderstanding.

Openness does not mean telling your spouse everything in a hurtful or careless way. It means creating a safe relationship where both partners can honestly talk about their feelings, concerns, mistakes, finances, expectations, struggles, and dreams without fear of unnecessary humiliation or condemnation.

A strong marriage requires:

• Honest communication — Talk about problems instead of allowing them to grow in silence.
• Trust and transparency — Avoid unnecessary secrecy that can damage confidence in the relationship.
• Active listening — Listen to understand, not simply to respond or attack.
• Emotional vulnerability — Let your spouse know when you are hurting, worried, disappointed, or afraid.
• Respect — Honesty should never become an excuse for insults, threats, or emotional abuse.
• Forgiveness — When mistakes are acknowledged, work together toward healing and restoration.

The Bible says:

“Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” — Proverbs 11:14 (KJV)

And:

“Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.” — James 1:19 (KJV)

Marriage should be a place where two people can feel safe enough to communicate, honest enough to admit their weaknesses, and humble enough to work through their differences.

See also  Divorced mother shares benefits she's enjoying now that she did not enjoy when she was married

Don’t allow silence, secrets, and suspicion to build walls between you and your spouse. Talk. Listen. Understand. Forgive. Grow together.

❤️ Openness builds trust. Trust strengthens intimacy. And healthy communication helps build a stronger marriage.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending