Connect with us

Politics

Jonathan considers comeback for 2027 as court hears eligibility suit today

Published

on

Former President Goodluck Jonathan has said he will consult widely before making a decision on calls urging him to contest the 2027 presidential election, stressing that the race for Nigeria’s highest office “is not a computer game.”

Jonathan spoke on Thursday while receiving youth groups who visited his office in Abuja to press him to join the race, saying he had taken note of their appeal but would not rush into a political decision without wide consultations.

His remarks come as the Federal High Court in Abuja is set to hear a suit today (Friday) seeking to bar him from contesting the 2027 presidential election on the grounds that he has allegedly exceeded the constitutional limit for holding the office of President.

The suit, filed by a lawyer, Johnmary Jideobi, is asking the court to declare Jonathan ineligible to run again and to restrain the Independent National Electoral Commission from accepting or publishing his name as a candidate in the forthcoming election.

Speaking on Thursday while receiving some youth groups who visited him at his office in Abuja to press him to return to the presidential race, the former President said he would consult widely before taking any decision, stressing that leadership required careful consideration.

“You are asking me to come and contest the next election. The presidential race is not a computer game. But I’ve heard you, and I’ll consult widely,” he said.

He commended the youth for showing interest in the country, describing patriotism as essential to nation-building.

“If you have no interest in the country, you will not bother to be here,” he added.

Jonathan also urged young Nigerians to promote peace and credible elections, warning that the absence of transparent electoral processes discouraged competent citizens from participating in politics.

“The key thing we need in this country is peace, so you continue to advocate for that. And you continue to advocate for peaceful and credible elections in the country.

“Because if we don’t have peaceful and credible elections, most good citizens will not want to bother to get involved in politics.”

See also  Why I emerged as APC National Chairman – Yilwatda

The former President lamented Nigeria’s low voter turnout, saying the country recorded one of the poorest participation rates during elections despite having a large voting population.

“I’ve observed elections in about 14 or more African countries and even Southeast Asia. Nigeria has the lowest turnout in every election cycle.

“I think INEC needs to do something about it. They need to start getting consultants to look at it. And what is the cause? As young people, you must be involved in the electoral process,” he stated.

Jonathan challenged the youth to participate actively in the electoral process by obtaining voter cards and voting during elections.

“If I ask how many of you have your voter’s card now, probably 50 per cent of you don’t have your voter’s card. And you’re asking me to go and contest the election. So you must participate in the electoral process,” he said.

He also lamented the perception of Nigerians abroad, attributing it partly to leadership failures over the years.

Jonathan, however, reiterated that he had only listened to the appeal and would continue consultations before making any political decision ahead of 2027.

“I will consult. I cannot just wake up and say I want to be the president of Nigeria again. But I am telling you that I will consult. If there is a need to, I will wait,” Jonathan stated.

Meanwhile, the Federal High Court in Abuja will hear the suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2102/2025, asking the court to declare Jonathan constitutionally ineligible to seek the presidency again.

Justice Peter Lifu, on April 28, ordered that hearing notices be issued and served on the defendants after they failed to file responses to the suit.

Jonathan is listed as the first defendant in the matter, while INEC and the Attorney-General of the Federation are joined as second and third defendants, respectively.

The plaintiff is seeking an order restraining Jonathan from presenting himself to any political party as a candidate for the 2027 presidential election.

He also prayed the court to stop INEC from accepting or publishing Jonathan’s name as a presidential candidate for the poll.

See also  Togo, Niger, Benin owe Nigeria N25bn for electricity – NERC

In the originating summons, the plaintiff asked the court to determine “whether in view of the combined provisions of sections 1(1), (2) and (3) and 137(3) of the 1999 Constitution, the 1st defendant is eligible, under any circumstances whatsoever, to contest for the office of the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

Jideobi argued that Jonathan had already exhausted the constitutional limit of two terms, having completed the tenure of late President Umaru Yar’Adua before serving another full term after winning the 2011 presidential election.

In an affidavit deposed to by Emmanuel Agida in support of the suit, the plaintiff stated that Jonathan was sworn in as president on May 6, 2010, following Yar’Adua’s death on May 5, 2010.

The affidavit added that reports suggesting Jonathan may contest the 2027 election informed the decision to approach the court.

“That the plaintiff believes that the 1st defendant, having completed the unexpired term of late President Yar’Adua and subsequently served a full term after the 2011 election, has exhausted the constitutional limit of two tenures as president,” the affidavit partly read.

The plaintiff further argued that if Jonathan contests and wins the 2027 election, he would be taking the presidential oath of office for the third time, contrary to the provisions of the Constitution.

Agida said the suit was filed “in the public interest, in the defence of the rule of law and accentuation of the supremacy of the Constitution, and to preserve the integrity of the Nigerian constitutional order.”

No pact with Jonathan – NDC

The Nigeria Democratic Congress has, however, dismissed speculations that it has entered into a pact with Jonathan ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

The party insisted that consultations on its presidential ticket are still ongoing.

The party said it was keeping its doors open to high-profile politicians across party lines, including former governors, ex-ministers and serving lawmakers interested in joining its platform ahead of the next general election.

See also  Trump, CNN clash over Iran ‘victory’ report

Speaking in Abuja on Thursday, the Deputy National Spokesman of the NDC, Abdulmumin Abdulsalam, said the party had not zoned its presidential ticket and had yet to take any decision regarding a possible Jonathan candidacy.

According to him, the NDC remained committed to broad consultations and consensus-building as it positions itself as an emerging force in the country’s political landscape.

“The NDC is a party that believes in merging ideas and consultations across boards. I can categorically tell you that we have not zoned the presidential ticket. Consultations are still ongoing since politics is a dynamic game,” he said.

Abdulsalam added that the party was already attracting interest from influential political figures, including members of the ruling party.

“As I speak to you, we are still expecting high-profile personalities, including former governors, ex-ministers, serving and former lawmakers, even from the ruling party.

“The NDC is the beautiful bride that everybody wants to have right now,” he stated.

Reacting to reports that the NDC could be considering Jonathan as its presidential flagbearer, Abdulsalam described the claims as mere speculation.

“This is another rumour making the rounds that former President Jonathan wants to pitch his tent in our party. There is no concrete move like that in the hierarchy of our party, and such a decision has not been taken,” he said.

He, however, noted that the former President remained constitutionally qualified to seek office on any political platform if he so desired.

“But I can tell you that everything is still possible in the case of former President Jonathan.

“He is a Nigerian who is eminently qualified to fly the flag of the party on any platform of his choice. But as of today, we have no pact with him,” Abdulsalam added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Abia ADC chair retains position, vows to unseat Otti

Published

on

Don Norman Obinna on Friday in Umuahia retained his position as the state chairman of the African Democratic Congress in Abia State, and vowed to unseat Governor Alex Otti in the 2027 governorship election.

His emergence followed the state congress of the party held in Umuahia by the Abia Congress Committee led by Chioma Cynthia Ladeinde as chairman, while Agodi Kanu emerged as secretary.

Naomi Nwogu and Gold Mbamaghionyeukwu emerged as the state Woman Leader and Deputy Woman Leader respectively.

Addressing journalists, Obinna said the congress followed the April 29 judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which, according to him, clarified the conduct of party congresses under Article 17 of the ADC Constitution.

“So all we did was to go back to our states and execute or implement the court judgments

“We wrote to INEC, Abuja, because it is a court judgment, a court order. We wrote to them and they know that we held the congresses today, and they were there,” he said.

The congress began on Thursday with ward and local government congresses, while the state congress was held on Friday.

“By the grace of God, it was an affirmation that I was returned as the ADC Chairman of the state”, he said, adding that a representative of INEC observed the process.

He further stated that consultations were held with electoral authorities ahead of the exercise.

“We held an extensive meeting with them yesterday. We sent a letter to them. They are aware of this congress because they had to obey the court order, the court judgment, which was delivered in favour of the state chairman,” he said.

See also  Buhari’s voting bloc falls apart as followers pitch tents

Obinna said the congress was conducted in line with Article 17 of the ADC constitution.

“It is in our constitution. So what we did today was in line with the ADC constitution and also in line with the court judgment. Because the reason we took David Marks National Working Committee to court was not to challenge the leadership.

“Rather, we went to court to ask the court to interpret the ADC constitution, article 17 of the ADC constitution, to determine whose constitutional right it is to conduct congresses. And the court in that wisdom, after producing through our constitution, gave a judgment that it is the ADC state chairman and the National Working Committee and the state executive committee that have the right to conduct congresses. And that was what we did today”, he said.

He insisted that the party has no factions in the state.

Continue Reading

Politics

Halt sales of nomination forms, Bala tells ADC

Published

on

The Nafiu Bala faction of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) has asked the David Mark-led leadership to halt the sale of Expression of Interest and Nomination Forms pending the determination of a suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

The development came as the Federal High Court in Abuja adjourned indefinitely the leadership suit filed by Bala after the plaintiff applied for the transfer of the case to another judge.

In a statement issued in Abuja on Friday, May 8, 2026 the Secretary of the ADC Board of Trustees, Rufus Akanmi, said the need to stop the sale of the forms formed part of resolutions reached at the party’s BoT meeting held on Thursday.

He warned that anyone proceeding with the purchase of nomination forms despite the directive would be doing so at their own risk.

Akanmi said, “All parties concerned are directed to immediately suspend the sale/purchase of such forms pending the final determination of the matter presently before the Federal High Court.

“It is expressly stated that any person who proceeds to purchase the said forms does so at their own risk, and the African Democratic Congress shall not accept any liability or responsibility for consequences arising therefrom,” he said.

The faction also commended the Supreme Court for its April 30, 2026 judgment, describing the verdict as a landmark contribution to constitutional democracy and the rule of law within Nigeria’s political system.

Akanmi urged members of the coalition within the party and the Mark’s faction to set aside partisan interests and collaborate with the Gombe-led leadership in the interest of party unity.

According to him, such cooperation was necessary to guarantee the party’s effective participation in the forthcoming general elections and ensure the emergence of credible candidates for elective offices at the state, local government and ward levels.

See also  Communities stranded after terrorists destroy police stations

“The Board hereby directs the National Working Committee to constitute Caretaker Committees in all states where the tenure of the current State Executive Committees has expired, to ensure continuity and stability in party administration at the grassroots level.

“We further direct the National Working Committee to immediately initiate processes for the convening of a Mini National Convention, for the purpose of filling all vacant positions arising from the recent resignation of certain members of the NWC, in accordance with the Constitution of the party,” he added.

Meanwhile, proceedings in the substantive leadership suit suffered another setback on Friday after Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court in Abuja adjourned the matter indefinitely.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, had earlier been stalled following an interlocutory appeal filed by David Mark, which eventually went to the Supreme Court.

At Friday’s proceedings, counsel for the plaintiff, Luka Musa Haruna, informed the court that the Supreme Court on April 30 dismissed the interlocutory appeal for lacking merit and set aside the Court of Appeal’s order staying proceedings in the substantive suit.

“The interlocutory appeal of the 2nd defendant has travelled to the Supreme Court. My Lord, we are glad to inform this honourable court that on the 30th day of April 2026, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the interlocutory appeal dismissing the said appeal for lacking in merit,” he said.

Haruna, however, disclosed that the plaintiff had through a letter dated May 4, 2026 applied to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for the transfer of the case to another judge.

He said the letter had already been transmitted to the court registrar and urged Justice Nwite to await the administrative decision of the Chief Judge.

See also  FG slammed as medical tourism hits $550m annually

“At this juncture, we must humbly pray to your Lordship to wait for the administrative decision of the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Haruna said.

The request drew stiff opposition from the defence team, which accused the plaintiff of attempting to frustrate the accelerated hearing earlier ordered by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court.

Counsel for the first defendant, Realwan Okpanachi, who held brief for S.E. Aruwa, argued that the plaintiff had misrepresented the outcome of the Supreme Court judgment.

According to him, the apex court partially allowed the appeal and specifically upheld the appellate court’s order directing accelerated hearing of the case.

Okpanachi further faulted the plaintiff for allegedly ambushing the defendants with the transfer request.

“We have not received any communication regarding that application. My Lord, so as it is, we don’t know the form or the content of that application. Therefore, we take the approach of the plaintiff as an ambush

“We also consider it as an attempt to frustrate the order of accelerated hearing granted by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court,” he added.

Counsel for the second defendant, Sulaiman Usman, also condemned the plaintiff’s move, describing it as “forum shopping and judge shopping.”

Usman told the court that the Supreme Court had commended Justice Nwite “in glowing terms” over his handling of the proceedings.

“So my Lord, for the plaintiffs to come back to this court, and to inform us today that they have written a private correspondence to the Honourable Chief Judge, and to hinge that to make a request for this court to await the outcome of that private correspondence, is not only unfortunate My Lord, but a dangerous trend which must not be allowed to stand,” he said.

See also  Why I emerged as APC National Chairman – Yilwatda

Counsel for the third defendant, M.E. Sherriff, aligned himself with the submissions of the first and second defendants, arguing that substantive prayers could not be sought through ordinary letters.

Similarly, counsel for the fifth defendant, P.I. Oyewole, described the application as “strange” and accused the plaintiff of inviting the Chief Judge “to indulge in judicial rascality.”

“My Lord, asking the Chief Judge to transfer that kind of case is worse than forum shopping,” Oyewole argued.

Responding, Haruna faulted the defence for attacking a letter they had not seen, insisting that the plaintiff stood by its application.

Justice Nwite subsequently held that the court could not take any decision on the letter without hearing all parties.

“Taking a decision or any action in such a letter without hearing from the defendants will amount to breach of their fundamental right in this suit,” the judge ruled.

He added that since the letter was addressed to the Chief Judge, the trial court could not make any pronouncement on it.

“This matter is best adjourned sine die to afford the parties properly file a Certified True Copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the interlocutory appeal in the suit, to serve the defendants with the letter addressed to the Honourable Chief Judge, and finally to await further or any directive from the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Justice Nwite said.

The matter was thereafter adjourned indefinitely.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fani-Kayode, Omokri oppose return of power to North before 2031

Published

on

Two of President Bola Tinubu’s ambassador-designates, Femi Fani-Kayode and Reno Omokri have declared that returning power to Northern Nigeria after only one southern term would be unpatriotic and a betrayal of the rotation pact that has anchored Nigeria’s democracy since 1999.

They added that it would also be a slight against the man who was the chief architect of the North’s return to power in 2015.

Ambassador-designate to South Africa, Fani-Kayode, and Ambassador-designate to Mexico, Omokri, made the declaration in a joint statement on Saturday, endorsing Tinubu for re-election in 2027.

The two allies argued that the North had enjoyed two full, uninterrupted terms under former President Muhammadu Buhari, with southern support, and that equity demanded the South be allowed a commensurate two terms before any power shift.

“We view it as unpatriotic and inimical to the unity, equilibrium, and progress of Nigeria for anyone to even conceive of power returning to Northern Nigeria after only one term of four years, during which it was domiciled in Southern Nigeria,” they said.

They noted that the South’s current hold on power was not incidental but deliberate.

They added, “Not just in Southern Nigeria, but in the specific hands of the man who was the chief architect for the return of power to the North in 2015.”

On the principle of reciprocity, they were unambiguous.

“We are of the opinion that one good turn deserves another and that one good term deserves another,” they said.

The statement described the gentleman’s agreement on rotation as the bedrock of Nigeria’s post-military stability.

“It is in the best interest of the stability, unity, and prosperity of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and in keeping with the Gentleman’s Agreement which ushered in our Fourth Republic in 1999, after sixteen years of turbulence and political instability, for there to be a balanced and orderly rotation of power in Nigeria between the North and the South,” they said.

See also  ADC chieftain laments Ogun’s growth in 50 years, blames poor leadership

They added that Northern Nigeria, having “completed and made full and unfettered use of two terms of four years under the Muhammadu Buhari administration,” had exhausted its turn in the rotation and must now yield.

On performance, the statement credited Tinubu with 12 consecutive cycles of GDP growth and trade surpluses, saying he had added “$67 billion to our economy” and made “Nigeria the sixth largest contributor to global GDP growth in 2025.”

The designates also pointed to infrastructure under the Renewed Hope Agenda as proof of a unifying presidency. They called on all Nigerians to back the president’s re-election.

“Finally, we call on all Nigerians, irrespective of region, religion, and communion, to join us and queue behind the present Presidency and future candidacy of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and the Renewed Hope Agenda, which has seen infrastructural efforts to unite Nigeria, including the ₦15 trillion 750-kilometre Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway, the ₦13 trillion 1068-kilometre Illela-Sokoto-Badagry Superhighway, and bridging the gap between the Southeast and the entire North through the 465-kilometre Trans-Saharan Road being constructed at a cost of an estimated $750 million.

“If we all extend the right hand of fellowship to President Bola Tinubu, we will, with the help of God, collectively see Nigeria become a $1 trillion economy by 2031,” they said.

Citing Switzerland as a model, they argued that structured power-sharing had kept the Alpine nation stable and conflict-free for over two centuries.

“The reason Switzerland has been stable, peaceful, and prosperous for the last 211 years is because that Alpine nation wisely introduced power sharing amongst its multiethnic population and has not seen any conflict since 1815,” they said.

See also  Mbah’s planned APC defection tears Enugu PDP apart

The statement ended on a rallying note. “To re-elect President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a task that must be done,” they declared.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending