Connect with us

Politics

APC consensus push faces resistance in states ahead of primary elections

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress (APC) is facing growing internal tensions across several states as its consensus arrangement ahead of the 2027 general elections continues to generate resistance, competing interests, and political realignments within the party structure.

Findings by The PUNCH show that in some states, including Katsina, Borno, and Jigawa, party stakeholders have adopted the consensus option as a strategy to reduce intra-party conflict and promote unity ahead of the elections.

However, as gathered by our correspondent, in other states such as Ondo, Benue, Oyo and others, the party is heading for competitive primaries across key constituencies as aspirants insist on open contests to determine candidates.

Meanwhile, states like Yobe, Ogun, Sokoto, Plateau, Kwara and others are witnessing growing pushback, with several aspirants rejecting consensus arrangements and demanding a more transparent and competitive selection process.

Meanwhile, Vice President Kashim Shettima, on Thursday, submitted the completed expression of interest and nomination forms of Bola Tinubu to the national leadership of the APC in Abuja.

The submission, held at the Shettima Hall of the Bola Tinubu International Conference Centre, attracted top government officials and party stakeholders.

Speaking at the event, Shettima urged Nigerians across political, religious, and ethnic lines to support Tinubu’s 2027 bid, describing it as key to sustaining ongoing reforms and national development.

He stated, “On behalf of our great party, I urge all Nigerians, irrespective of differences in political affiliations, religious persuasions, private or social background, to support this nomination and, by the special grace of God, the candidacy of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 2027.

Speaking at the event, the APC National Chairman, Nentawe Yilwatda, said the submission of the forms represents continuity as well as a consolidation of the administration’s ongoing reforms and development initiatives.

“Our National Executive Committee, which is the second-highest decision-making organ of the party, has already endorsed Mr President and we stand firmly by that decision,” he said.

He further stated that the APC National Working Committee has unanimously backed Tinubu for a second term, citing what he called the President’s “remarkable performance.”

“The governors have seen the positive impact of these reforms. Today, there is more money accruing to states and local governments, ”he added.

Ajibola Bashiru, the National Secretary, observed that the submission of the forms marks an important step toward Tinubu’s participation in the party primaries and his eventual bid for re-election in 2027.

On the mode of presidential primary, Bashiru said, “The party has adopted direct primary for the emergence of its presidential candidate. Whoever is willing to contest against President Tinubu can do so.”

Chairman of the Progressive Governors Forum and Governor of Imo State, Hope Uzodinma, who spoke on behalf of APC governors, expressed the governors’ full backing for Tinubu’s re-election bid, affirming their united support for his return in 2027.

The APC commenced the sale of expression of interest and nomination forms on April 28, with the exercise scheduled to close by midnight on May 6.

The screening exercise is expected to begin on May 7 and end on May 12, while the party has approved both consensus and direct primaries in line with the Electoral Act 2025.

The primaries will subsequently be conducted in phases: House of Representatives on Friday, May 15; Senate on Monday, May 18; State House of Assembly on Wednesday, May 20; Governorship on Thursday, May 21; and the Presidential primary on Saturday, May 23. Appeal committees will sit shortly after each primary to address complaints arising from the exercises.

The Independent National Electoral Commission had scheduled the Presidential and National Assembly elections for Saturday, January 16, 2027, while Governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections will hold on Saturday, February 6, 2027.

INEC also stated that party primaries and the resolution of related disputes will take place between April 23 and May 30, 2026.

In addition, the Commission announced that campaigns for the Presidential and National Assembly elections will begin on August 19, 2026, while campaigns for Governorship and State Assembly elections will commence on September 9, 2026.

As the date for primaries draws closer, the Katsina State Governor, Dikko Umaru Radda, has defended the adoption of consensus primaries in the state, saying the decision was reached by stakeholders to preserve party unity and cohesion.

Radda, who is seeking re-election, spoke with journalists on Thursday in Abuja, after submitting his governorship expression of interest and nomination forms, respectively.

Radda said the ruling party was performing strongly in the state and expressed confidence that it would secure victory in the 2027 elections.

He stated, “This is a normal exercise. We are here to submit our expression of interest and nomination forms to our party, the APC. And we came, usually, to do that with due respect to the party and the party’s principles. So, in Katsina, APC is doing very well, and we are expecting victory come 2027, Inshallah, at all levels in Katsina State. So, we are very grateful.

“We don’t have any fear. Katsina State is an APC state; 361 ward councillors, 34 local governments, 34 members of the State Assembly, 15 members of the National Assembly, as well as three senators — they all belong to APC. So, I think Katsina is one of the most comfortable APC states in the North-West of the country.

“You know, we met with all the stakeholders in the state, and we all agreed that we are going to adopt consensus so that we continue with the party’s strength and cohesion, and also maintain peace in our party.’’

In Borno State, the APC has finalised arrangements to present a consensus governorship candidate, Mustapha Gubio, the immediate past Commissioner of Works under the administration of Governor Babagana Zulum, to fly the party’s flag in the 2027 general elections.

Findings by The PUNCH indicate that the decision was unanimously reached by party stakeholders, with Gubio, reportedly the preferred choice of Governor Zulum, emerging after his main contender, Senator Kakashehu Lawan, stepped down from the race.

It was gathered that Lawan had earlier purchased the expression of interest and nomination forms for the governorship contest, but later withdrew, citing the need to promote party unity and coordination within the APC.

Following his withdrawal, the consensus arrangement has reportedly been widely accepted across the state, with no recorded opposition from stakeholders or other aspirants proceeding to obtain forms, while the APC has also aligned its senatorial structure around Ali Ndume for Borno South, Kakashehu Lawan for Borno Central, and Muhammad Monguno for Borno North.

As of the time of this report, no aspirant had indicated interest in challenging the arrangements at the primaries, even as opposition parties continue their preparations for the 2027 elections.

Similarly, the APC in Jigawa State has adopted the consensus option for selecting candidates for the senatorial, House of Representatives, and State House of Assembly elections ahead of the 2027 polls, in line with the provisions of the Electoral Act.

Party stakeholders said the decision was intended to reduce costs, minimise internal disputes, and project a united front in the state, where the APC has remained politically dominant since 2015.

See also  Lamido, Turaki, Makarfi lead PDP chairman race

Although no aspirant has openly opposed the consensus arrangement, signs of dissatisfaction are reportedly growing within the party, with supporters of unsuccessful aspirants using social media platforms to express frustration and engage in heated exchanges.

A PUNCH correspondent’s attempt to speak directly with some of the consensus losers proved abortive, as most declined to comment or were unavailable when contacted.

Efforts to obtain an official response from the Jigawa APC leadership were unsuccessful, as the committee overseeing the consensus process denied journalists access to the proceedings, which commenced last Monday at the Government House in Dutse, the state capital.

Instead, a list containing the names of successful candidates has been circulating widely on social media, although the document carries no official signature or endorsement from the party leadership.

In a related development, one of the aspirants for the Jigawa South-West Senatorial District, Dr Halima Zakari, publicly accepted the outcome of the consensus process in a statement posted on her Facebook page last Tuesday after losing the bid.

“I accept the results of the consensus process in good faith and reiterate my unwavering loyalty to our great party, the APC,” Zakari stated, adding that “party unity remains paramount as we work together for the progress of Jigawa and Nigeria at large.”

Also, the APC in Zamfara State has adopted a consensus arrangement for some elective positions, including the governorship, where the incumbent Governor Dauda Lawal is the sole candidate for the position.

However, for the remaining positions, the party is expected to apply a mix of consensus and direct primaries in some constituencies.

In the Zamfara North Senatorial Zone, several aspirants have already purchased nomination forms, including former governor Alhaji Mahmuda Shinkafi, the incumbent senator of the zone, Sahabi Ya’u, APC stalwart, Dr Sani Shinkafi, current House of Representatives member, Aminu Jaji, and former minister Alhaji Tijjani Yahaya.

Speaking at a press conference held at his residence recently, Shinkafi firmly stated that he would not accept the consensus arrangement, stressing that justice must be ensured for all aspirants contesting elective positions in order to maintain peace in the state.

He said, “It is high time the APC stakeholders knew that every party member has the right to contest for whatever position he wants.

“We have all agreed to allow Governor Dauda Lawal to stand as the only governorship candidate of our great party, the APC, but apart from him, all positions must be contested for.

“We will never agree on the imposition of candidates, so there must be primary elections for all the positions except that of the governor.”

In his reaction, the party leader in the state and former governor Abdul Aziz Yari, said the party would still pursue consensus, adding that where it fails, direct primaries would be adopted.

He stated, “Where the consensus failed, we will be left with no option but to allow primaries to hold. We have already successfully conducted consensus in some places, and it works, but we still have some candidates who have yet to reconcile.”

Similarly, in Edo State, findings by our correspondent indicate that both consensus arrangements and direct primaries will be used in selecting candidates who will contest under the APC platform.

Credible party sources, who requested anonymity as they are not authorised to speak on the matter, disclosed that in Edo North and Edo Central, the sitting senators representing both zones, Adams Oshiomhole and Joe Ikpea, are expected to fly the party’s flag in the general election as consensus candidates.

However, one of the sources noted that the same arrangement does not apply in Edo South.

Unlike the states mentioned above, where some level of calm is being maintained, tensions are rising in Ogun, Yobe, Oyo, and others as aspirants engage in heated intra-party campaigns.

The Ogun State chapter of the APC  adopted a consensus arrangement to select its candidates ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Governor Dapo Abiodun recently reaffirmed this position, urging aspirants of the ruling party in the state to respect existing local government zoning arrangements and embrace consensus-building as preparations for the elections progress.

The governor also reportedly assured that aspirants who may not secure the party’s tickets under the consensus arrangement would have their nomination form fees refunded, along with possible political compensation through appointments.

According to a statement by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Kayode Akinmade, the governor made the appeal during a strategic meeting in Abeokuta with House of Representatives and House of Assembly aspirants, as well as party leaders from the state’s 20 local government areas.

He urged the aspirants to prioritise unity, dialogue, and compromise over divisive internal contests.

While the consensus arrangement for the House of Assembly and House of Representatives tickets has not generated significant controversy, the situation is different for the three senatorial districts, where intense competition continues among aspirants and stakeholders.

The battle for the Ogun East senatorial ticket is between the incumbent and former governor of the state, Otunba Gbenga Daniel, and Abiodun.

The governor’s formal declaration followed a stakeholders’ meeting of the Ogun East APC held at Adeola Odutola Hall, Ijebu Ode, where Abiodun was announced as the adopted consensus candidate for the senatorial district.

However, Daniel, in a video that has since gone viral, alleged that he was excluded from the meeting where the consensus decision was reached.

The senator, speaking from his campaign bus under the OGD/PBAT Movement, claimed that he was denied access to the venue.

The restrained relationship between Daniel and Abiodun over the past two years is widely believed to be rooted in the struggle for control of the Ogun East senatorial ticket.

Meanwhile, Governor Abiodun, according to a statement by his Chief Press Secretary, Lekan Adeniran, on Thursday, formally submitted his Senate nomination form at the national headquarters of the party in Abuja as the consensus candidate for Ogun East Senatorial District.

During the submission, the governor described the moment as more than a political exercise, saying it reflected his commitment to the people of Ogun East and their shared heritage of history, enterprise, culture, and development potential.

Elsewhere in Ogun West, the senatorial race has also become highly competitive, with the Deputy Governor, Noimot Salako-Oyedele, joining other contenders, including former Senator Tolu Odebiyi, Adekunle Akinlade, Jimoh Ojugbele, and Olusegun Gbeleyi, while party leaders are still consulting on how to resolve tensions surrounding the consensus arrangement for the senatorial tickets.

An insider noted, “As far as the consensus arrangement is concerned, where we are having a bit of challenge is the senatorial race. The leadership of the party is meeting, and everything will be resolved very soon.

“And as for going to primaries, the party is weighing the options. I am not sure that the party will be able to manage the challenge. Yes, it looks tough, but the party is determined to keep its cohesion and unity.

“The party certainly will be on the side of the people… that much I can tell you, so justice will prevail.

See also  All Progressives Congress Group Canvasses 12m Votes For Tinubu

Another reliable source hinted that there is a growing groundswell of anger and frustration over the way the governor and the party have been handling the consensus arrangement.

“I think we can still continue to enjoy the peace of the graveyard that seems to be prevalent in our party now as a result of what many have come to term as forced consensus. The truth is that many of us are not happy, but we await how things will turn out in the coming weeks.”

In Yobe State, the party’s move to adopt consensus candidates ahead of the 2027 elections is facing resistance, particularly in the governorship race, where divisions have emerged following the endorsement of former Secretary to the State Government, Baba Wali.

Although the party leadership under Governor Mai Mala Buni and former governor, now Minister of Police Affairs, Senator Ibrahim Geidam, insists on consensus as the preferred mode of primaries, opposition from key aspirants and stakeholders suggests the process may eventually lead to direct primaries if consultations fail.

Findings show that while the APC leadership is pushing for a negotiated succession to avoid a divisive contest, Wali’s endorsement has sparked resistance across the three senatorial zones, with several aspirants rejecting what they describe as an imposition.

In a communiqué issued after the meeting, the stakeholders described Wali as “a seasoned technocrat with adequate qualifications, patience and temperament for good leadership and governance.”

The forum maintained that Wali’s extensive experience in government and service in successive administrations placed him in a strong position to sustain continuity and consolidate on the achievements of the Buni administration.

The stakeholders also reaffirmed their support for the re-election of President Bola Tinubu in 2027 and restated the party’s preference for consensus candidacy for major elective positions in the state.

The endorsement has reportedly deepened divisions within the party and intensified calls for direct primaries among aggrieved aspirants.

Less than 24 hours after the announcement, Senator Ibrahim Bomai rejected the consensus arrangement, describing the endorsement as contrary to democratic principles and internal party democracy.

“We categorically reject this attempt to subvert due process. We reject the culture of imposition. We reject any scheme that undermines fairness, equity and the democratic rights of our people,” he said.

Another governorship aspirant, Musa Tumsah, also opposed the endorsement of Wali as the consensus candidate.

Although he did not publicly release a detailed statement, associates close to him confirmed that both he and his supporters were dissatisfied with the arrangement.

One of his loyalists revealed that Tumsah, who was among the earliest aspirants to obtain the APC governorship expression of interest form, believed the consensus process lacked transparency and fairness.

Findings by our correspondent showed that several governorship aspirants who rejected the arrangement are now pushing for direct primaries ahead of the APC governorship contest in the state.

Those preparing for the primaries include Bomai, Tumsah, Lawan Geidam, former senatorial candidate Bashir Machina, and former Inspector-General of Police, Usman Alkali.

The development indicates that efforts by the APC leadership to produce a consensus governorship candidate may face major obstacles as aggrieved aspirants intensify consultations and mobilise supporters across the three senatorial zones.

The same scenario appears to be prevalent in Kano, where certain stakeholders, including youth groups, have rejected agreements on consensus reached in some areas.

A group known as the Coalition for Better Kano has also opposed the reported plan by APC stakeholders to allocate the Kano Central Senatorial ticket to former Governor of the state, Malam Ibrahim Shekarau.

The senatorial race also includes other aspirants such as Usman Bala, Garba Abubakar, Sha’aban Sharada, and Abdulsalam Zaura.

In a statement signed by its leader, Inyass Auwal, the group rejected the move to hand the ticket to Shekarau, insisting that the principle of political justice requires that loyalty within the party should be duly rewarded.

The statement read, “While we hold Malam Ibrahim Shekarau in high esteem as a father and elder statesman, the principles of political justice demand that loyalty must be rewarded.

“We urge you (Shekarau) not to allow your name or influence to be used in a manner that creates a sense of injustice against those who kept the party’s light burning in your absence,” the group said.

Similarly, the Gaya Youth Democracy Supporters called on party members and stakeholders in the Ajingi/Gaya/Albasu Federal Constituency to remain calm and uphold the rule of law.

In Oyo State, tension among governorship aspirants within the APC has continued to rise despite ongoing discussions around a possible consensus arrangement, with many aspirants already purchasing governorship nomination forms.

Among the aspirants, Senator Sharafadeen Alli is believed to enjoy significant support within the APC structure. The former Chairman of Ibadan North Local Government, former Secretary to the State Government, and former Chief of Staff to former Governor Rashidi Ladoja between 2003 and 2007 has recently secured endorsements from several party leaders and stakeholders at both the national and state levels, particularly within the Ibadan and Ibarapa political blocs.

However, other governorship aspirants, including former Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria and immediate past Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu; legal practitioner, Akeem Agbaje; historian, Dr Ayo Adesina; oil and gas businessman, Ayodele Alao; Prince Kola Asanike; Muyiwa Gbadegesin; former Deputy Governor to Governor Seyi Makinde between 2011 and 2019, Rauf Olaniyan; and Dr Moshood Abiola, are reportedly insisting on direct primaries.

Investigations further revealed that some aspirants may eventually be persuaded to step down and compensated with appointments at either the national or state level after the 2027 general elections.

A credible source told The PUNCH that, “Though other aspirants are still insisting on direct primaries, party executives, elders, and leaders, coupled with the directive from Abuja, have agreed on a consensus to present a strong and marketable candidate capable of reclaiming the Agodi Government House after eight years in opposition.

“The party hierarchy is still deliberating on it. We are going for consensus for the governorship, National Assembly, and State Assembly elections,” an APC chieftain insisted.’’

Another party stalwart, who did not want his name mentioned, said, “It’s an internal issue, and we shall resolve it. Actually, what we have resolved upon is consensus. That’s what we want. You should expect that aspirants will kick against it when it is not in their favour. This is politics; we shall resolve it. When we get to the bridge, we shall know how to cross it.”

In a related development, fresh divisions have emerged within the ruling party in Sokoto State following the party’s adoption of consensus arrangements ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The party is reportedly backing a consensus for major elective positions across the state.

Under the arrangement, Governor Ahmed Aliyu is expected to retain the governorship ticket, while Senator Aliyu Wamakko is likely to remain the party’s candidate for Sokoto North Senatorial District. Umar Ajiya and former senator Ibrahim Danbuwa are also being considered for key positions.

See also  NDC clears Peter Obi for presidential primary

However, the arrangement has sparked discontent among some aspirants and party loyalists, particularly those contesting legislative seats.

For instance, the Kware/Wamakko Federal Constituency has emerged as a major flashpoint within the party.

Sources said the endorsement of incumbent lawmaker Ahmad Kalambaina for another term unsettled the Deputy Speaker of the Sokoto State House of Assembly, Kabiru Kware, amid claims that there had earlier been an agreement for the seat to rotate to Kware Local Government Area in 2027.

In Ondo, there are indications that the consensus arrangement may not be feasible.

This is because almost all senatorial, National Assembly, and State House of Assembly aspirants have already obtained their expression of interest and nomination forms to contest for the party’s tickets.

Though the party has not officially announced the mode of primary to be adopted, it was gathered that aspirants have been unable to agree on a consensus candidate among themselves. As it stands, all aspirants across the Senatorial, National Assembly, and State Assembly races in Ondo State are preparing for direct primaries.

Reacting to the development, the Director of Media and Publicity, Mr Steve Otaloro, said whichever mode is eventually adopted by the party, the process would be fair and credible.

He said, “Consensus remains the first option provided by the party for the forthcoming primary election. However, where consensus is not mutually agreed upon by all concerned stakeholders and aspirants in any constituency, the party will proceed with a direct primary in line with the party’s guidelines.

“At this stage, the Ondo State chapter of the party is not in a position to categorically determine which constituencies have accepted or rejected consensus arrangements because consultations and discussions are currently taking place at the constituency and local government levels among aspirants, party leaders and stakeholders, not at the state level.’’

To dispel any contention, the APC in Ekiti has advised aspirants for National Assembly positions to prepare for direct primaries for senatorial and federal constituency tickets if the consensus option fails.

The party disclosed  in a recent statement issued by its State Publicity Secretary, Segun Dipe, that “while we do not rule out the possibility of a true consensus, we urge all contestants to respect the party’s constitution and guidelines, and to refrain from misrepresenting the positions of our leaders.

“Let every aspirant go to the field and test his/her political strength. Where consensus does not work, the direct primary option will certainly be adopted, as provided for in our Constitution.”

The APC Chairman in Benue State, Benjamin Omale, said on Thursday that the party would adopt direct primaries.

Omale explained that the National Vice Chairman of the APC for the North-Central zone, Alhaji Mu’azu Rijau, disclosed this during a peace meeting held last Sunday in Makurdi.

He added that the zonal vice chairman also clarified the party’s position on the issue of automatic tickets in its primaries.

“Principally, as I mentioned, based on the party directives and the provision of the Electoral Act, the mode of primaries should be consensus or direct. Initially, we have decided to have direct primaries in Benue State, and that has been the decision.”

Omale quoted Rijau as saying.

Meanwhile, Governor Hyacinth Alia and the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, have expressed differing positions on the issue of automatic tickets for all elective positions in the state.

While the SGF had announced that candidates for state and National Assembly positions, as well as the governorship, would be given automatic tickets, Alia stated that the decision on automatic tickets was beyond both of them.

If an automatic ticket is eventually adopted, several aspirants, including former Governor Gabriel Suswam, former House of Representatives member Francis Agbo, and others, may be excluded from the contest.

Senator Danjuma Goje, who represents Gombe Central, has rejected the consensus arrangement that produced Mohammed Ahmed and is now insisting on direct primaries, citing the provisions of the Electoral Act.

Similarly, Alfred John, who lost the consensus ticket to Ali Isa for the Billiri/Balanga Federal Constituency, said he would consider other options following the outcome.

Also, former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Prof Isa Pantami, and former Minister of Transportation, Saidu Alkali, have vowed to challenge the process that produced Jamilu Gwamna as the APC consensus governorship candidate.

In a statement signed by the APC State Publicity Secretary, Moses Kyari, the party acknowledged the concerns raised by some of the aspirants.

“The All Progressives Congress in Gombe State has taken note of certain expressions of dissatisfaction from a few aspirants regarding the recently announced consensus candidates for the governorship, National Assembly, and State Assembly elections,” the statement read.

Kyari explained that the party’s constitution recognises consensus as a valid and preferred method for selecting candidates.

He added that the party carried out extensive consultations involving its Elders Committee, State Working Committee, State Executive Committee and all aspirants.

“We affirm that every aspirant was duly informed and formally invited to participate in the consensus-building process. However, it is a matter of record that some of the individuals now complaining opted, for their own reasons, to decline participation,” he stated.

The party, however, clarified that consensus was not binding on all aspirants.

“Neither the Electoral Act nor the APC Constitution imposes consensus as a fait accompli. Where any aspirant disagrees with the consensus arrangement, the party will proceed with the direct primary option,” Kyari said.

Also, the contest for the 2027 governorship ticket of the APC in Kwara State has intensified amid uncertainty over whether the party would adopt consensus or direct primaries.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Thursday, the APC Chairman in Kwara State, Prince Sunday Fagbemi, said the state chapter had not yet received official instructions on the mode of primaries to adopt.

“I am not in a position to say whether the party in the state would adopt consensus or direct primaries. We need to receive direct from the national body,” he said.

The APC Plateau State is navigating a delicate balance between consensus and direct primaries as internal disagreements threaten to complicate its candidate selection process ahead of the elections.

In an interview with The PUNCH in Jos on Thursday, the state APC Chairman, Rufus Bature, stated, “We are using both options. It depends on which one the stakeholders at the state or local government want. As a party, we can’t decide for them. Both options are acceptable under the Electoral Act — the consensus or the direct primaries.

“Regarding the governorship, the election is conducted by officials from the party at the national level. So, they will decide which one to adopt after consultations.

“Of course, they will consult with us. For now, we are focusing on the screening of candidates. It is after the screening that we will know which direction to take. We will cross the river when we get to the bank.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Adelabu backs down, seeks APC reconciliation ahead of 2027 in Oyo

Published

on

The former Minister of Power and All Progressives Congress governorship aspirant in Oyo State, Bayo Adelabu, on Thursday backed down from pursuing legal action over the party’s governorship primary, urging the APC leadership to initiate a comprehensive reconciliation process ahead of the 2027 election.

Adelabu, in a statement released in Ibadan, the state capital, said his decision was not due to a lack of evidence, confidence or conviction, but was taken in the interest of the party’s progress ahead of the 2027 elections.

He explained that the decision followed a meeting with some party leaders and representatives of his loyalists and supporters from across the 33 local government areas and 351 wards in the state.

The PUNCH reports that some Oyo APC governorship aspirants have been at loggerheads with the state and national executive members of the party over the nomination of Sharafadeen Alli as the party’s governorship candidate for the 2027 election.

They alleged that Alli, who represents Oyo South Senatorial District in the National Assembly, was imposed on them.

Adelabu, in his statement, said that as a loyal and committed member of the APC, he had decided not to pursue an appeal within the party or institute legal proceedings over the process at this time.

The former minister said, “This decision is not because of a lack of evidence, confidence or conviction. Neither should it be interpreted as an act of surrender or an indication that my aspiration to serve as governor of Oyo State is a do-or-die affair.

See also  #FreeNnamdiKanu: Protest wave hits Abuja, paralyses S’East states

“Rather, I have chosen, in the interest of peace, party stability and the larger future of the APC in the state, not to further escalate the matter through avenues that may deepen existing divisions and undermine the cohesion of our great party.

“More importantly, our respected national chairman, during his recent visit to Oyo, openly acknowledged that there were errors, unfairness and injustice associated with aspects of the primary election process.

“We believe that an acknowledgement or apology, though important, cannot and should not substitute for the necessary correction where the opportunity to address the grievances still exists.”

He expressed concern that many loyal members had invested years of their lives, enormous personal resources, time, energy and political capital in building the APC.

Many of them, according to him, now felt that their sacrifices, votes and preferences had been disregarded and that candidates who did not necessarily reflect the popular choices of party members had emerged without a transparent declaration of the primary results.

“Their grievances are genuine and must not be dismissed as merely the product of the influence or persuasion of any particular aspirant.

“Indeed, many party members are deeply convinced that their own votes, sacrifices and preferences were disregarded, and some may not readily accept appeals from the aspirants they supported.

“Rather, names of selected individuals were subsequently entered on the INEC electronic portal as the party’s candidates for the 2027 general elections.

“This development has effectively produced candidates without the transparent publication of the actual results upon which such nominations were supposedly based.

See also  Insecurity: Tinubu meets service chiefs as military pounds terrorists

“The concerns arising from this process cut across the governorship, senatorial, House of Representatives and state House of Assembly nominations.

“We agreed that the absence of publicly declared and verifiable results has understandably generated serious concerns about the transparency, credibility and integrity of the nomination process.

“We also affirmed that substantial documentary materials, authenticated collation records and video evidence exist which, in our considered view, raise serious questions about aspects of the process and the eventual outcomes.”

He asked the national leadership of the party to restore confidence, rebuild trust and return cohesion and unity to the party.

“The national leadership of our party must therefore appreciate that the responsibility for reconciliation cannot simply be transferred to aspirants.

“The APC has important work to do to restore confidence, rebuild trust and return cohesion and unity to the party in the state,” he said.

The former minister urged the national leadership of the APC to urgently initiate a comprehensive, sincere and credible reconciliation process covering all categories of nominations and genuinely engaging all affected stakeholders.

“Members who feel wounded, betrayed or alienated must be deliberately engaged and reassured, not merely through appeals, but through concrete actions that demonstrate that their loyalty, sacrifices and contributions still matter.

“The implications of the present situation must not be underestimated. Electoral victory cannot be secured merely by entering names on an electronic portal or announcing candidates.

“Elections are won through the trust, enthusiasm, commitment and active participation of party members and supporters, particularly at the grassroots,” he added.

See also  2027: I foresee new VP, SGF, Senate President, underground rigging plans – Primate Ayodele

Adelabu insisted that his aspiration to serve as the state governor was driven by a genuine desire to contribute more directly to the development, prosperity and progress of Oyo State and its people.

“My aspiration to serve as Governor of Oyo State has never been, and will never be, a do-or-die project. By the grace of Almighty God, I have been privileged to serve at the highest levels of both the private and public sectors, and for these opportunities, I remain profoundly grateful.

“However, as human beings, we may propose, but Almighty God ultimately disposes according to His divine will and perfect timing.

“While recent developments may have delayed the realisation of this aspiration, I remain firmly convinced that what may be delayed by human actions cannot be denied by Almighty God. God’s time, indeed, remains the best,” the former minister stressed.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

APC, opposition clash over FG’s $1bn household palliative ahead of 2027

Published

on

The All Progressives Congress and opposition parties have clashed over the Federal Government’s $1bn Household Prosperity and Empowerment Social Protection Project, with the opposition alleging that the initiative is designed to influence voters ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The opposition parties, including the African Democratic Congress and National Democratic Congress, questioned the timing of the programme, which was launched in Abuja on Wednesday amid growing political activities ahead of the elections.

However, the APC rejected the allegations, insisting that the initiative was a genuine effort by the Bola Tinubu administration to tackle poverty and provide sustainable economic support for vulnerable Nigerians.

The Federal Government said the programme was designed to move Nigeria’s social protection system beyond short-term palliatives to sustainable economic empowerment and self-reliance.

Launched under the theme, “From Palliatives to Pathways,” the initiative targets vulnerable households by improving beneficiary identification, providing immediate support during economic shocks and creating pathways for households to graduate from poverty.

The programme was unveiled by the First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, who said the economic reforms of the Tinubu administration had made continued support for vulnerable Nigerians necessary.

“Under the leadership of His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, our nation is implementing far-reaching reforms to strengthen the economy, lay a solid foundation for sustainable growth, and shared prosperity,” she said.

She added that many families continued to face difficulties despite the ongoing reforms, stressing that the HOPE-SP project would provide “immediate stabilisation assistance” while placing vulnerable households on a path to recovery, empowerment and self-reliance.

The Federal Government said the programme would target about 7.6m vulnerable households, with eligible beneficiaries expected to receive a one-off digital shock-response payment of N40,000. Beneficiaries are to be selected from the National Social Register and verified with their National Identification Numbers.

The launch also featured the unveiling of other components of the government’s new social protection architecture, including the One-Humanitarian-One Poverty Response System, the Emergency Cash Transfer Programme and a ministerial blueprint for humanitarian affairs and poverty reduction.

The Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Poverty Reduction, Dr Bernard Doro, said the government was moving away from fragmented interventions and reactive palliatives towards a system that would identify vulnerable households, assess their needs and track their progress towards economic self-reliance.

He disclosed that more than N600bn had been disbursed in cash transfers to vulnerable Nigerians over the past three years, reaching slightly more than 10m households.

ADC raises concerns

However, opposition parties said the timing of the new intervention raised questions, particularly with the 2027 elections less than a year away.

The African Democratic Congress described the $1bn programme as a reaction to the economic hardship Nigerians had experienced under the Tinubu administration and linked its launch to the growing popularity of the party’s presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar’s proposal for a targeted production subsidy.

In a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, on Thursday, the party questioned why the government was only now making a major financial commitment to social protection after years of complaints from Nigerians over rising food, transport and energy costs.

The party said the government had previously insisted that there was no money to adequately cushion the effects of its economic reforms but had now found $1bn for a new intervention as elections approached.

“Why did the poor only become visible when their votes become valuable?” the ADC asked.

The party also questioned the funding and administrative structure of the programme, particularly the role of the First Lady in unveiling a Federal Government intervention.

“Is this a Federal Government programme or a project of the First Lady?” the party asked, demanding clarification on the budget head or financing arrangement under which the money was approved, the institution responsible for accounting for the funds and who would ultimately answer to the Auditor-General and the National Assembly.

See also  CBN blacklists top loan defaulters

The ADC said it supported genuine efforts to protect vulnerable Nigerians but argued that palliatives could not substitute for policies that restored purchasing power and expanded economic opportunities.

It further accused the administration of attempting to address the consequences of its economic policies through what it described as a politically motivated intervention ahead of the 2027 elections.

Timing wrong — NDC

Also reacting, the Nigeria Democratic Congress said it welcomed any genuine intervention aimed at improving the welfare of Nigerians but questioned the timing of the HOPE-SP launch.

The party’s National Publicity Secretary, Osa Director, told our correspondent that the proximity of the elections made the development open to political interpretation.

“We welcome every move directed at addressing the challenges facing our people. However, with elections just a few months away, one may wonder why the government is just realising the need for this intervention.

“The timing will definitely elicit questions that the ruling party and the government in power may be unwilling to answer,” he said.

On its part, the Social Democratic Party was more direct in its assessment, describing the initiative as a voter-inducement strategy packaged as an empowerment programme.

The party’s spokesman, Rufus Aiyenigba, told The PUNCH that the intervention amounted to “a household votes prospecting outreach,” although he added that such an initiative could not guarantee electoral victory.

The opposition criticism comes against the backdrop of the administration’s wider social protection efforts since the removal of petrol subsidy and the unification of the foreign exchange market, policies which the government has repeatedly defended as necessary for economic recovery.

The government has maintained that its latest social protection framework is intended to ensure that vulnerable Nigerians are not left behind as economic reforms take effect.

APC defends project

However, the ruling All Progressives Congress dismissed the opposition’s allegations, arguing that the proximity of the 2027 elections did not mean the government should suspend its responsibilities to Nigerians.

APC Director of Publicity, Bala Ibrahim, said the Federal Government had a duty to continue implementing programmes designed to improve the welfare of citizens irrespective of the electoral calendar.

“Because an election is coming does not mean the government should fold its arms and shy away from its responsibilities. It is supposed to continue,” Ibrahim said.

According to him, the fact that an intervention would be delivered close to an election did not automatically make it an electoral inducement.

“Whether or not there is an election coming, the government is doing what it ought to continue doing. There is nothing wrong with extending the strategy in such a way that the dividends of democracy will come to the people as close as possible to the time of the election.

“That is strategic timing. It is not corruption. It is not anything that is done deliberately to change the hands of the clock,” he said.

Reacting to the opposition’s claim that the intervention was designed to woo voters, Ibrahim said there was nothing inherently wrong with government initiatives gaining public support, provided they were legitimate.

“If they say it is done with a view to wooing voters, what is wrong with wooing voters as long as what is done is legitimate?” he asked.

The APC spokesman said the Federal Government’s intervention programmes had been in development before the 2027 election season and that their implementation should not be interpreted solely through the political calendar.

“Democratic dividends going to the people are works in progress. They have been in the plan, and the timing has just come at this material time when the election is close by. I don’t see anything wrong with that,” he added.

See also  2027: I foresee new VP, SGF, Senate President, underground rigging plans – Primate Ayodele

The controversy over the HOPE-SP places the Tinubu administration’s latest social protection initiative at the intersection of two competing narratives.

The government’s argument that it is strengthening social protection to shield vulnerable Nigerians from economic shocks, and the opposition’s contention that the intervention is coming at a politically convenient time.

For the government, the immediate challenge will be to demonstrate that the $1bn programme is transparently funded, fairly implemented and capable of producing measurable improvements in the lives of its intended beneficiaries.

The opposition parties, meanwhile, are likely to continue scrutinising the programme as the country moves closer to the 2027 elections.

Atiku challenges Tinubu

Meanwhile, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar challenged the government of President Bola Tinubu to reconcile conflicting figures on the number of households reached under its expanded cash-transfer programme.

Atiku said the contradiction between the government’s earlier claim that 15 million vulnerable households had been reached and a more recent figure of “slightly over 10 million households” raised serious questions about the programme’s implementation and the government’s management of public funds.

In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, on Thursday, the ADC presidential candidate asked the Federal Government to explain what happened to the five million households missing from the latest figure.

“On July 16, 2026, the Presidency officially declared that expanded cash transfers had reached 15 million vulnerable households. It repeated essentially the same figure on August 2, 2026. Yet on August 26, 2026, the Minister of Humanitarian Affairs suddenly told Nigerians that only ‘slightly over 10 million households’ had been reached.

“So, where did five million households go? These are not opposition figures. They are Tinubu’s figures contradicting Tinubu’s figures,” the statement read in part.

The former Vice President also questioned the financial figures associated with the programme, saying the government’s reported expenditure did not appear to correspond with the number of beneficiaries and the amount each household was expected to receive.

According to him, qualifying households are to receive ₦25,000 monthly for three months, amounting to ₦75,000 per household.

He argued that if 10 million households received the full three-month payment, the total would amount to about ₦750bn, while payment to 15 million households would exceed ₦1.1tn.

Atiku said the Federal Government’s reported expenditure of just over ₦600bn requires further explanation.

“How many received one tranche, two tranches or all three? How many payments failed or were reversed? How many names were merely lifted from an existing social register and presented as evidence of actual payment?” he asked.

The ADC presidential candidate insisted that inclusion in a social register should not be treated as proof that beneficiaries actually received government funds.

“A name on a social register is not a bank alert. Counting people in a database is not the same thing as proving money reached them,” he stated.

Atiku called on the Federal Government to publish detailed records of the payments, including verified beneficiary households, payment tranches, state-by-state distribution figures, failed transactions and reversals.

He also demanded an independent audit of the programme, saying Nigerians should be able to verify how the reported hundreds of billions of naira were spent.

“If ₦600bn truly moved, then government must show the trail: unique verified households, payment tranches, state-by-state distribution, failed transactions, reversals and an independent audit,” he said.

The former vice president’s criticism comes against the backdrop of the Federal Government’s expanded social protection measures, which the Tinubu administration has presented as part of its response to the rising cost of living and the economic difficulties confronting vulnerable households.

The cash-transfer programme was expanded following the removal of the petrol subsidy and the resulting increase in transportation, food and other household costs.

See also  Tinubu: ‘We Are Not Relying On Governors Or Defections To Win’ – APC Chieftain, Kalu

The government has repeatedly argued that targeted social interventions are necessary to cushion the effects of economic reforms on poor and vulnerable Nigerians.

Atiku, however, said government should focus more on reducing the underlying cost pressures driving households into poverty than on expanding the number of people receiving palliatives.

“Beyond the arithmetic lies a bigger indictment. A government boasting that tens of millions of households require emergency cash transfers should not be congratulating itself. It should be explaining why its economic policies pushed so many people into desperation,” he added.

He accused the government of worsening the financial pressure on households through higher fuel, transport, food and energy costs.

“Tinubu has turned poverty into a government programme: make fuel expensive, transport rises; transport rises, food rises; food rises, medicine becomes expensive; the family basket shrinks,” Atiku said.

He added that businesses were also facing higher energy and logistics costs, while workers had lost purchasing power.

“When millions become poorer, government registers them as ‘vulnerable,’ gives some of them cash and calls it reform.

“That is not prosperity. It is the industrial production of poverty followed by the bureaucratic management of the poor,” he argued.

The ADC chieftain contrasted the administration’s cash-transfer strategy with his proposed approach to reducing the cost of living, particularly through intervention in the domestic petroleum value chain.

He said his proposed policy would involve a targeted, capped and transparent intervention designed to lower fuel and transportation costs at source.

“This is precisely why Atiku proposes a targeted, capped and transparent intervention in the domestic petroleum value chain. It is designed to reduce fuel and transportation costs at source,” he said.

According to him, reducing fuel costs would have a wider impact across the economy by lowering transportation and logistics expenses for farmers, traders, manufacturers and households.

“When petrol becomes cheaper, the bus driver spends less, the farmer moves produce more cheaply, the trader pays less for haulage, businesses face lower logistics costs and the savings travel through the economy to the family kitchen,” he said.

He argued that the difference between his proposal and the Tinubu administration’s approach was that his plan would seek to tackle the causes of rising household expenses rather than compensate people after the damage had been done.

“Tinubu waits until poverty enters the home and arrives with a cash-transfer form. Atiku wants to reduce the cost pressures that drove the family into poverty in the first place,” he said.

The former vice president said a credible anti-poverty programme should ultimately reduce the number of people dependent on government assistance rather than expand the pool of beneficiaries.

“A serious anti-poverty policy should reduce the number of people needing palliatives, not celebrate how many millions have become vulnerable,” he said.

He also accused the Federal Government of applying a different standard of accountability to opposition proposals and its own expenditure.

“The same government that demands every kobo of Atiku’s proposed intervention cannot ask Nigerians to accept its own hundreds of billions on faith. That is not accountability. It is hypocrisy armed with a calculator,” Atiku said.

He called on the government to reconcile the conflicting beneficiary figures and provide verifiable evidence of the payments made.

“Until the Tinubu administration reconciles these figures and produces a verifiable payment trail, Nigerians are entitled to keep asking: where did the five million households disappear to?

“Did they graduate from poverty, vanish from the social register, or simply disappear because government propaganda ran ahead of the truth?,” he asked.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Suspected thugs disrupt Ondo Speaker’s impeachment bid

Published

on

Members of the Ondo State House of Assembly on Thursday held a parliamentary meeting as part of moves to impeach the Speaker, Olamide Oladiji.

However, the lawmakers’ plan to carry out the impeachment on the floor of the House was unsuccessful following the appearance of three unknown men, alleged to be political thugs, at the Assembly complex.

It was gathered that it took the intervention of policemen from the state command to drive the men out of the complex.

The legislators, however, continued with a parliamentary meeting on the premises of the Assembly complex.

One of the legislators, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the meeting was strategic and centred on the removal of the Speaker, adding that “the man is gone already.”

He alleged that the unknown men were thugs sent to prevent the plenary from holding.

“He (the embattled Speaker) sent thugs to the Assembly to attack us, but he was disappointed. We sent them out, but we did not hold plenary again. But we will still meet to impeach him,” he stated.

The Assembly has been engulfed in crisis for the past few weeks, with 21 of its 26 members reportedly signing a notice for the Speaker’s impeachment over allegations of financial misconduct.

The Speaker was accused of diverting N44m meant for the reordering of the budget of the Ondo State Oil Producing Areas Development Commission.

Consequently, the aggrieved lawmakers gave the Speaker a deadline to resign or face impeachment on the floor of the House.

See also  CBN blacklists top loan defaulters

However, the impeachment move was stalled following interventions by Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa and the leadership of the All Progressives Congress.

Oladiji has denied the allegations, insisting that nothing of such happened.

Speaking with our correspondent on the telephone shortly before the meeting, the Chairman of the House Committee on Information, Olatunji Fabiyi, said the impeachment would be carried out “definitely.”

He said, “We have been hearing news that we have abandoned the process. This is a lie and misinformation. We are still on it; he can’t be our Speaker again.

“Although the governor has been speaking with some of us, that does not stop the impeachment. There is no going back.”

Reacting, the embattled Speaker denied sending thugs to the Assembly, saying the men were members of his constituency who came to the complex for another purpose and had no intention of disrupting the lawmakers’ activities.

Oladiji also insisted that the matter had been resolved and that there was no longer any impeachment process.

He said, “There’s nothing like an impeachment process because the issue has been resolved and there is no impeachment.

“The governor and other leaders of the party have already intervened, and today we were supposed to have our parliamentary meeting.

“I have about three of my youth leaders whom I invited to come and pick up forms for recruitment, but, unknowingly to them, they did not know what was going on in the House of Assembly.

“Some of the members approached them and asked them why they were at the House of Assembly. They are not new and have been coming to the House of Assembly, but they insisted that they did not want to see them on the premises.

See also  Adeleke’s defection attracting more members to Accord – Chair

“I came out of my office and tried to pacify the members, telling them that they were my people who had been coming to the House of Assembly and had not harassed any member. But they said they did not want them and asked them to leave.

“So, there is nothing like an impeachment notice. There is nothing like an impeachment process, and we were able to resolve the whole matter.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending