Connect with us

Politics

2027: Jonathan keeps mum as northern opposition intensifies pressure

Published

on

Ahead of the 2027 presidential election, pressure is mounting on former President, Goodluck Jonathan to join the race.

The former president is under pressure, especially from the northern opposition, to declare his interest to run against President Bola Tinubu.

Jonathan served as Nigerian president for about five years.

The former Bayelsa State governor became a president by chance following the death of Umaru Musa Yar’Adua in May 2010.

Yar’Adua served as the president of Nigeria from 2007 until his death in May 2010.

He won the Nigerian presidential election held on 21 April, 2007, and was sworn in on 29 May 2007.

On Thursday May 6, 2010, Jonathan was sworn in as 14th head of state and 4th executive President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

After completing the tenure of Yar’Adua, Jonathan contested and won the presidential election in 2011 but was defeated by the coalition of political parties under the All Progressives Congress, APC, in 2015, in his second attempt.

Back then in 2015, there was heated debate about an individual being sworn in thrice as the President of Nigeria as some groups opposed Jonathan’s emergence for this reason.

It was had then reported that some Northern youths called on Jonathan to bury his second term ambition, declaring that no Nigerian President can be sworn in thrice.

The youths, under the aegis of Arewa Youths Forum, AYF, said the then president had taken the oath of office twice.

The debate resonated again in 2023 when different positions on his eligibility for the 2023 presidential election made the rounds.

However, a Federal High Court in Yenagoa, the Bayelsa State capital, in a judgment delivered on Friday, May 27, 2022, cleared Jonathan for the 2023 Presidential contest.

This happened hours to the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, presidential primary elections as there was anticipation that he would join the contest.

And by then, the former President was linked with the All Progressives Congress, APC, presidential race following the reported purchase of N100 million form on his behalf by a Fulani group.

The court held that Jonathan, who lost the 2015 election to President Muhammadu Buhari, could still vie for the highest political office in the country.

See also  Tinubu lacks understanding of insecurity, says opposition

The presiding judge, Justice Isa Hamma Dashen, who gave the judgement, also held that Jonathan’s right to contest for the office of president in 2023 cannot be stopped by any retroactive law.

In an originating summons filed by Andy Solomon and Idibiye Abraham, the plaintiffs sought an order of the court stating that Jonathan is not affected by the fourth alteration to the constitution barring Vice-Presidents who succeed their principals from serving more than one full term.

APC, Jonathan and the Independent National Electoral Commission were listed as defendants in the suit marked FHC/YNG/CS/86/2022, before Justice Isa Dashen.

However, Jonathan did not contest during the 2023 presidential election, even with the claims that then President Muhammadu Buhari was aiming at compensating the Bayelsa-born politician for relinquishing power to him in 2015.

And now, as political discussions for 2027 have commenced in earnest, the former president appears to be under pressure to enter the race.

Just like in 2023, the pressure seems to be coming mostly from the North.

In accordance with the gentleman’s agreement between the north and the south, Jonathan’s presidency would favour the north as he would have to do just one term in office with no room for a second, according to the constitution.

Although the former President has not made public his decision on whether or not he is entering the race, those around are being quoted to say that he will be one of the leading candidates to confront President Tinubu in the 2027 presidential poll.

He is rumoured to be readying himself to run on the platform of the People Democratic Party, PDP, with stories in some sections of the media claiming that he had already accepted.

Meanwhile, as Jonathan’s potential candidacy for the 2027 presidential election remains uncertain, with no official announcements or confirmations from him or the PDP regarding his intentions, some Nigerians and political observers have recently shared divergent views about him.

Shehu Sani, a former lawmaker, who represented Kaduna Central Senatorial District, in a recent interview on Channels Television, gave reasons Jonathan should not contest the forthcoming 2027 presidential election.

Sani said the PDP, the party Jonathan used to win the election in 2011, is no longer the same.

See also  Tinubu: ‘We Are Not Relying On Governors Or Defections To Win’ – APC Chieftain, Kalu

He advised the ex-president to jettison the idea of running for president come 2027.

Also, Dele Farotimi, a frontline lawyer, said that some politicians are trying hard to rebrand Jonathan, who was voted out of office by Nigerians in 2015 for valid reasons.

He pointed out that there were good reasons Nigerians decided to vote Jonathan out in 2015 which they believed was the solution to the country’s problems, but ended up in a worse situation

For a human rights lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, Jonathan is not interested in contesting the 2027 presidential election.

Meanwhile, when asked , if the PDP was ready to receive Jonathan’s ambition with open arms and hand him the party’s sole presidential ticket, the PDP National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, said the matter was still speculative.

But in a telephone interview , Dr Adetokunbo Pearse, a Lagos PDP chieftain and former member, Atiku Abubakar 2023 presidential campaign council, said he does not expect someone like Goodluck Jonathan to get the nod of the PDP even if he shows interest to run in the election.

Pearse, a former PDP national chairmanship aspirant and gubernatorial candidate in Lagos State, said Goodluck Jonathan, a full member of PDP, was more than welcome to come and run if he wants to, especially as the party has zoned the presidency to the South.

However, he noted that Jonathan has not been an active member of the party, doesn’t fund the party and shows no moral support.

He pointed out that Jonathan’s candidacy could lead to litigation, a risk the PDP is not ready to take.

“He’s not just coming to PDP. Jonathan is a member of PDP. He has not been very active; nonetheless, he’s a full member of the party.

“So as a member of the party, and since the party has zoned the presidency to the south, he’s more than welcome to come and run if he wants to run.

“My suspicion, though, is two things. Number one, he has been away from the party. He has not been involved, he has not been helpful, he has not been encouraging.

“He has not been funding the party, no moral support for about five years now. Therefore, I don’t see how he could get the nomination, because where will he get the delegates, so that’s the problem.

See also  Tanzanian President Hassan declared winner of disputed vote with 98 percent

“So if he wants to run, I don’t think he will win the primaries. And by the way, we don’t give tickets to anybody. We support whoever wants to run, and then they go and look for delegates. If they win the primaries with more delegates, then they become the nominee.

“Secondly, I don’t think it is in the best interest of the PDP to even field a person like Jonathan, because there is this question of whether or not he’s even legally qualified to run after being sworn in twice.

“Some people, some legal reading says, yes, you can run. Others, they cannot run. When you have such doubt. Don’t you think it is best for a party not to field him at all, not to support him? You see my point. I think he’s disqualified because court cases will come up. That is too risky. That is the point.

“We have people in the party who are running. The Governor of Oyo state has stated it clearly and he stands a good chance of winning the ticket.

“If he wins the ticket, I assure you he will defeat Tinubu in 2027. So what is this whole cry about Jonathan? I don’t understand what is going on in this country. Some people are calling Jonathan, others are calling for Tinubu, Atiku and all these old expired people.

“Why don’t we even support a new generation of leaders. By 2027, Makinde will be, I think, 59 years old. That’s what we need now. He has been tried in Oyo state, and he has performed extremely well, therefore, we don’t have a problem of who becomes the PDP candidate.

“But if Jonathan is to come, I just told you, my opinion, if he comes, I doubt he would be able to put together a number of delegates to defeat Makinde in the primaries.

“Secondly, it is not in the interest of PDP to field somebody who may become subject of litigation in the future.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Don’t accept vehicle donation from APC chairmen, Osun tells police, see why

Published

on

The Osun State Government has warned the Nigeria Police Force against accepting vehicles from local government chairmen elected on the platform of the All Progressives Congress, insisting that those currently managing council areas lack a valid mandate to remain in office.

The government described the proposed donation of security vehicles as a “poisoned gift with malicious, mischievous, and harmful intentions,” urging the police to reject the gesture in order to safeguard the integrity and reputation of the law enforcement agency.

This position was contained in a statement signed by the state Commissioner for Information and Public Enlightenment, Kolapo Alimi, a copy of which was obtained in Osogbo on Friday.

PUNCH Online reports that the Osun State chapter of the APC had earlier announced that local government chairmen in the state would proceed with plans to donate operational vehicles to the police to enhance security operations.

The APC, in a statement signed by its spokesperson, Kola Olabisi, criticised the ruling party in the state and Governor Ademola Adeleke, stating that the protection of lives and property should take precedence over political considerations.

The party argued that support for security agencies should not be politicised, maintaining that providing logistical assistance to the police was necessary to combat crime effectively.

However, the Osun State Government insisted that the donation should be rejected, condemning what it described as the politicisation of security matters by the APC.

According to the government, the individuals currently occupying local government offices under the APC lack legal backing, as the matter of their tenure remains subject to ongoing litigation.

See also  Olawepo-Hashim backs Jonathan, Atiku, Obi for PDP presidential race

“The so-called APC council executives, who have imposed themselves on the local governments without any legal basis, should not be seen as legitimate authorities providing support to security agencies,” the statement read.

The government further noted that the legal dispute over the tenure of the chairmen is already before the courts, with judgments expected on May 12 and May 21, 2026.

It urged the state Commissioner of Police to uphold the neutrality of the force and avoid actions that could compromise its institutional credibility.

The government also called on the Inspector-General of Police, Kayode Egbetokun, to intervene by directing officers in the Osun State Command to reject the vehicles pending the outcome of the court rulings.

The dispute over control of local government councils in the state stems from conflicting claims by chairmen elected during the February 22, 2025, local government election conducted under Governor Ademola Adeleke’s administration and those elected on the platform of the APC in the October 15, 2022, election held during the tenure of former governor Adegboyega Oyetola.

Although the APC-backed chairmen are currently administering the councils, the parties remain before different courts seeking judicial validation of their respective positions.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Politics

Falana, Adams predict one-candidate presidential poll in 2027

Published

on

Human rights lawyer, Femi Falana, and the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Gani Adams, on Thursday, warned that Nigeria could end up having only one presidential candidate in the 2027 election if the judiciary continues to interfere in political party affairs.

They spoke at the fifth Comrade Yinka Odumakin Memorial Lecture held at the Airport Hotel, Ikeja, Lagos.

The event had in attendance the President of the Nigeria Labour Congress, Joe Ajaero; activist and publisher of Sahara Reporters, Omoyele Sowore; and Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Olumide Fusika.

It was hosted by the President of the Oluyinka Odumakin Foundation, Dr Joe Odumakin, and was also attended by the Executive Director of the International Press Centre, Mr Lanre Arogundade; other activists, including Agba Jalingo and Richard Akinola.

Delivering the memorial lecture, Falana asserted that court orders and conflicting judgments were being used to destabilise political parties and could lead to a situation where only one political party would present a presidential candidate in the 2027 election.

He spoke against the backdrop of Wednesday’s pronouncement of the Independent National Electoral Commission that it would no longer recognise the factions of the African Democratic Congress led by David Mark or Rafiu Bala.

The INEC based its decision on a Court of Appeal judgment, which directed the commission to maintain the status quo pending the determination of a suit challenging the legality of David Mark’s leadership of the opposition party.

Speaking, Falana criticised the judiciary for interfering in the internal affairs of political parties despite provisions of the Electoral Act prohibiting such interference.

Falana said, “Through the manipulation of Nigerian courts and senior lawyers, you may have only one candidate contesting the presidential election in this country.

If that happens, Nigeria may not even need to spend money on a presidential election.”

See also  Ondo APC, PDP clash over N10,000 handouts by Aiyedatiwa

Falana warned that actions capable of undermining democracy could provoke unrest if Nigerians felt they no longer had a genuine electoral choice.

He urged civil society groups, labour unions and political activists to organise and defend democratic values, warning that unorganised protests could lead to anarchy rather than meaningful change.

“We must stop agonising and start organising in the interest of our people and democracy,” he said.

Speaking in the same vein, Adams warned that Nigeria was gradually drifting towards a one-party system, accusing those in power of using the judiciary to suppress opposition parties and the will of the people.

He said the situation reminded him of the political repression experienced during the military era and the struggle for democracy in the 1990s.

Adams said, “We are moving towards a one-party system. Those in power are using the judiciary to suppress the will of the people. We may end up having only one presidential candidate in Nigeria if care is not taken.”

He urged Nigerians not to remain silent because their ethnic group was in power, noting that political power rotates and silence in the face of injustice could later be used against those who failed to speak up.

According to him, Nigerians must continue to speak against injustice and defend democracy regardless of ethnic or political affiliations.

He added that the best way to honour the late Odumakin was for activists and civil society groups to remain committed to justice, democracy and good governance in Nigeria.

Delivering a lecture titled, “Can Nigeria’s Democracy Work without Restructuring?” Falana said restructuring had already been taking place in the country, but largely in favour of the political class, especially state governors and members of the ruling elite.

According to him, Nigeria operated more like a federal system in the First Republic when regions controlled the police, courts and local governments, but the 1999 Constitution returned the country to a unitary system with more items on the Exclusive Legislative List.

See also  PDP slams AbdulRazaq over school closure on insecurity in Kwara

He said, “In 1963, there were about 45 items on the Exclusive List, but today we have about 68 items. Practically everything is controlled by Abuja. What we have now is more of a unitary system than a federal system.”

Falana explained that some powers had been taken from the Federal Government through court cases filed by states, particularly on issues such as local government administration, Value Added Tax, and control of land.

He noted that despite the agitation for restructuring, many state governments had failed to utilise the powers already granted to them, especially in areas like electricity generation, railways and prisons, which were moved from the Exclusive List.

He said, “Some of those who shout restructuring don’t believe in it. Electricity, railways and prisons were removed from the Exclusive List, but how many states have generated electricity, built rail lines or established prisons? None.”

Speaking on the debate over state police, Falana warned that the system could be abused by state governors to suppress political opponents, citing abuses recorded during the First Republic when regional governments controlled the police.

He said the Police Council, which includes the President, Inspector-General of Police, Chairman of the Police Service Commission and state governors, was supposed to manage the Federal Police collectively, but the body hardly met, leaving policing effectively in the hands of the President.

Falana also criticised the political class for cornering the country’s resources, especially oil blocks and solid minerals, alleging that a few individuals had become extremely wealthy through government allocations of oil blocks and mining licences.

He said illegal mining and smuggling of minerals were also contributing to insecurity in some parts of the country, as unemployed youths were being recruited into illegal mining operations and criminal activities.

See also  2027: You can’t match Tinubu – Jandor tells Jonathan

Fusika (SAN) warned that the nation was approaching a dangerous end, especially with pervasive insecurity.

He, however, rallied all Nigerians to unite to tackle the issues facing the country.

Human rights activist Akinola decried what he described as the “incestuous relationship” between the executive and the judiciary.

“Politicians have hijacked the judiciary, and it is dangerous,” he said.

Speaking, NLC President Ajaero argued that Nigeria has been hijacked by a few persons benefitting from the present centralised structure.

He spoke in favour of restructuring, devolution of powers,  localising resources to decouple the present centralised structure and state police.

On calls for revolution, Ajaero warned that such a move must be organised so that it does not lead to anarchy.

In his remarks, Sowore opined that the President Bola Tinubu administration was driving Nigerians to push for a revolution.

Sowore said, “These are revolutionary times if we take advantage of them. I predicted, when President Bola Tinubu came to power, that he was the one who would lead us to a revolution in Nigeria. It is up to the Nigerian people to take charge of the moment and the opportunity he has provided for the revolution.

“Tinubu is on a highway driving you to a revolution, and you still have not got the message. But he will make it happen because this country cannot escape a revolution.

“Tinubu’s most important duty as President is to drive this country in a revolutionary direction where he, the rest of his colleagues, ministers, and friends will be strangers to the system that they think they brought about, where they think everybody is foolish and in need of handouts.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

Continue Reading

Politics

Wike says PDP crisis over, declares doors open for returnees

Published

on

The Minister of the Federal Capital Territory and chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, Nyesom Wike, has declared that the internal storm rocking the party has subsided, announcing an open-door policy for former members seeking a return.

Speaking during a media parley in Abuja on Friday, Wike likened politics to a game of football rather than a “fight to finish”.

He urged aggrieved politicians to set aside personal differences for the sake of the party’s progress.

Addressing the fallout from the party’s recent national convention, the former Rivers State governor stated that the time for internal bickering had passed, stressing that the party was now focused on reconciliation and rebuilding its ranks.

“As far as I’m concerned, the convention has come and gone. People are trooping in. I will say, the door is open. Yes, we have had crisis. Now the crisis is over. Do we still have to shut our doors? No. Certainly not,” Wike said.

The minister revealed that several members who had previously dumped the PDP had already signalled their intention to return, noting that the political environment was becoming increasingly acceptable for those ready to do the work.

Wike also took a swipe at the do-or-die mentality often associated with Nigerian politics, suggesting that such an approach made reconciliation impossible.

He framed the party’s recent struggles as a misunderstanding of intentions rather than a permanent fracture.

“Politics is not a fight to finish. It’s like a game, like a football. If you see it as a do or die, it becomes difficult to reconcile. For us, it’s not that way.

See also  BREAKING: Soludo wins Anambra governorship election

“We have had our differences, but if you’re really sincere, there’s nothing left. We can do it together and move the party forward,” he said.

Sending a message to aspiring candidates, Wike warned that political relevance was earned through visibility and hard work, not title alone.

He hinted that those who remained on the sidelines would not be recognised as serious contenders in future polls.

“There’s no doubt that we have a lot of work to do, but what is important is that we have put the convention behind us,” he added.

PUNCH Online reports that the PDP has been embroiled in a leadership crisis since 2025, with rival factions holding separate conventions and fighting for control of the party in court.

This has stoked fears about the opposition’s unity ahead of the 2027 elections.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending