Connect with us

News

Groups Kick As Islamic Council Says No Christian Genocide In Nigeria

Published

on

Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs blames insecurity on poverty, climate change, crime | Seek foreign help to stop Christian killings, Anglican Primate tells Tinubu

Christian bodies, including the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN), Northern States Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), its Kaduna State Chapter and others have kicked against the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs’ (NSCIA) dismissal of the reports of a Christian genocide in Nigeria.

The NSCIA had described the reports of Christian genocide in Nigeria as false, divisive, and part of a broader geopolitical conspiracy to destabilise the country.

However, the president of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN), Bishop Francis Wale Oke, has insisted that it would be a ‘desecration’ to the memory of thousands of victims to describe the killings targeting Christian communities in some states in the North as anything other than genocide.

After a meeting of the Ulamah Council in Abuja on Sunday, the national secretary of the NSCIA, Prof Is-haq Oloyede, said both Muslims and Christians were victims of the same failed security system, poverty, and criminality, and that it was not a religious persecution.

“We turn to our genuine Christian brothers and sisters and tell them: you are not our enemies. You are our compatriots, colleagues, and neighbours.

“We are both Muslims and Christians — victims of a perennial, failed security architecture and a brutal criminal insurgency that targets us all.

“ We have never denied our collective pain. Do not allow foreign political gladiators or domestic separatists to exploit our real suffering to destroy our shared home.

“We, as Muslims, stand with you today against all forms of violence, criminality, and terror. We affirm that in Nigeria, there is no Christian genocide, and there is no Muslim genocide.

“The tragedy in Nigeria is not one of religion but of poverty, climate change, prolonged poor governance, and armed criminals who kill indiscriminately — while sections of the world seek to exploit the situation for geopolitical gain.”

He called on the international community and the press to reject the false, dangerous, and destabilising narrative of a Christian genocide.

“We also urge the Nigerian government to redouble its efforts to protect all citizens, regardless of faith; to defeat the bandits and terrorists; to expose all corrupt instigators of this divisive agenda; and to hold to account any foreign actors working against Nigeria’s unity,” he added.

According to Oloyede, the narrative of genocide was being pushed by foreign political interests seeking to fragment Nigeria along religious lines.

Oloyede warned that the attempt by some Western powers, particularly the United States, to brand Nigeria’s security crisis as genocide was a geopolitical ploy designed to fragment the nation.
He accused certain foreign actors of exploiting Nigeria’s insecurity for “geopolitical profits” while turning a blind eye to atrocities elsewhere, including Gaza.

“If the USA truly loves humanity, it should strengthen Nigeria’s capacity to fight banditry and insurgency, not undermine the country with false narratives,” he said.

The NSCIA insisted that there was no religious war in Nigeria, noting that the constitution guarantees freedom of religion through three co-existing legal systems — common law, sharia, and customary law.

See also  Senate set to grill new service chiefs today

He accused the United States and other Western actors of exploiting the country’s security challenges to advance their own agenda.

“Genuine assistance requires partnership, not unilateral actions which, even if unintentional, could fragment our nation. We will not allow Nigeria to be destabilised by a foreign agenda,” he declared.
The NSCIA maintained that the recent statements by some American political figures linking Nigeria to Christian persecution were “factually baseless and morally reckless.”

It noted that Amnesty International and other credible global bodies had found no evidence of a coordinated campaign to exterminate Christians in the country.

Oloyede said, “What Nigeria faces is a complex tragedy of poverty, climate change, and criminality. Armed groups kill indiscriminately—Muslims and Christians alike. These terrorists are not our representatives; they are our mortal enemies.”

The Council argued that linking the violence in northern Nigeria to religious motives ignored the deeper causes of insecurity, including desertification, economic deprivation, and organised crime in mining and arms trafficking.

The NSCIA also claimed the “genocide” narrative intensified after Nigeria reaffirmed support for the Palestinian cause at the United Nations General Assembly.

It said the misinformation was being driven by far-right and pro-Israeli lobbyists to distract global attention from the ongoing conflict in Gaza.

The NSCIA urged the federal government to intensify efforts in protecting all Nigerians regardless of faith and to “destroy the bandits, expose their sponsors, and confront the corruption feeding insecurity.”

The group also called on the international community to resist false narratives and support Nigeria with intelligence sharing, logistics, and human capacity development.

“We believe that if the United States is truly a lover of humanity and genuinely cares about this country, what is expected is support to strengthen the capacity of government to sincerely fight banditry and insecurity.”“

No Controversy About Targeted Killings In Nigeria – Bishop Oke

But the President of the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN), Bishop Francis Wale Oke, has insisted that it would be a ‘desecration’ to the memory of thousands of victims to describe the killings targeting Christian communities in some states in the North as anything other than genocide.

During an interview with journalists at the Covenant Cathedral of Christ Life Church at Agodi, Ibadan, Oyo State capital, Bishop Oke said the scale and persistence of attacks on Christians in several parts of Northern Nigeria could “no longer be debated,” stressing that the situation demands urgent and sincere government action.

Worried by the unabated spate of killings of Christians for many years without an end in sight, the PFN President asked, “Where is Lea Sharibu? What happened to the Chibok girls? Chibok is a predominantly Christian community in Borno State.

“What is going on in Benue State is still on now? Since Donald Trump cried foul against Nigeria on the matter of genocide, many more people are being killed in Plateau State.”

Bishop Oke noted that United States President Donald Trump had previously designated Nigeria as a ‘Country of Particular Concern,’ citing what he described as ‘Christian genocide.’

See also  AU, Others Reject Israel’s Recognition Of Somaliland As Independent State

While Nigerian authorities have repeatedly rejected that classification, Oke said Trump’s concerns reflect a reality that many Nigerians were witnessing.

“We are not accusing the Muslim community, get me clear. We have been living together for a long time, maintaining mutual respect and harmony. It is the violent sect of Islam that is called Boko Haram, ISWAP, and others that use the name of Islam to attack churches.

“Hundreds of churches had been burnt down, tens of thousands of Christians had been massacred. Hundreds of pastors had been butchered.

“It would be a desecration to the blood of these Nigerians to call it any other name. There is not a single instance of a Christian group attacking Muslims. It is always the other way round. “

Anglican Primate Tells FG To Seek Foreign Help To Stop Christian Killings

For his part, Primate of the Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion), Most Rev’d Henry Ndukuba, has called on the federal government to seek foreign assistance if it is unable to end the violent killings and persecution of Christians in the country.

The Archbishop made this comment while speaking with journalists on the sidelines of the consecration of 15 new Bishops at the Cathedral of Church of the Advent, Abuja, on the issue of targeted killings of Christians in Nigeria.

Ndukuba confirmed the grim reality of targeted attacks, revealing that several pastors and their families remain in captivity after being abducted from their churches.

“The persecution of Christians and the violence that is going on in this land is not something that anybody can deny.

“As I am talking to you now, we have some of our pastors who are kidnapped with their families, taken from their church, and they have not been released.

“If our authorities, the government, cannot handle it, it is good for them to seek help. But at the due time, we will say what we should say,” he said.

Faith-based Killings In Nigeria A Reality- CAN

Contrary to insinuations that there are no faith-based killings in Nigeria, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has said that killings of Christians in Nigeria are a reality and should not be denied by any God fearing person.

Kaduna State CAN chairman Rev. Caleb Maaji said: “Killings in Nigeria are a reality and killings are never permitted by either Christians or Muslims.

It is very very unfortunate, no man makes life, no one has a right to take another person’s life no matter what. Whoever does that is not a religious person; they are criminals that are supposed to be arrested prosecuted and jailed after being tried.”

Corroborating his position, the chairman of CAN in the Northern States and the Federal Capital Territory, Rev. Dr John Joseph Hayab said, “My understanding of this argument is that even if they find the corpses of our children on ground, they will still deny, so we don’t need to react to them since that’s the reason why we have not been able to solve Nigerian problems – because people choose debating about sensitive or serious issues rather than finding solutions.

See also  NOA warns Jigawa communities on recurring floods

“We cannot continue to live in self denial. If you have a wound or you are sick and you refuse to accept and chose the part of denying that you are not sick … you will not get cured.’’

“The fact is that what we believe is that what is happening now is supposed to be an opportunity for all of us to find solutions and look at how we work together to stamp out these killings, expose those who are hiding under any religious name to kill fellow citizens.

“The denial is probably to satisfy some people who don’t want the problem solved, so if they choose the part of denial, I can tell you even if they see the corpse of a Christian, they will still deny it. They have done that before as well, so it’s not strange to us.

“We have condemned and spoken against all forms of killings in Nigeria, be it Christian or Muslim, but I have really never seen them courageously come out to criticise anybody who used their religious name to do evil, and that is why evil people are thinking that they have been supported.

‘I hope the Nigerian government will wake up from sleep and correct the wrongs. How can I deny that people are being killed? What will their family members think? he concluded.

US Has Credible Information About Killings In Nigeria – Isong

In reaction to claims of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs, former national publicity secretary and Current National Vice president South South zone for Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria, PFN, Archbishop Emma Gospel Isong, said that the US has credible intelligence about the killings, stressing that the US move was justified.

According to him, Nigeria should even be grateful for the designation.

He said that the international community had been watching Nigeria for many years, stressing that the US had enough surveillance technology and intelligence to say what it said.

“To say that Christians had been targeted within communities is a fact; some communities have been wiped out, and most of them have been put in internally displaced persons (IDP) camps.

“You cannot disagree except somebody who has been sleeping for the last 20 years.”

Isong, the General Overseer of Christian Central Chapel International (CCCI), Calabar, stressed that this is the time for Nigeria to restructure its security and intelligence system, rather than live in denial.

He said that admission would possibly lead to the US assisting Nigeria in enhancing its defensive capabilities. Isong dismissed the fear that the US would hurt Nigerians.

“I work under the Anti-Corruption and Inter-religious department of the United States Embassy. I’m a member of the board,” Isong maintained.

“They said that Nigerians whose hands are clean should have nothing to fear.
Those perpetrating killings in the guise of ethno-religious crises are the ones who deserve sanction from the United States Government.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FBI Submits Tinubu’s Records To US Judge

Published

on

The United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has submitted records relating to President Bola Tinubu’s 1993 drug-trafficking and money-laundering case directly to a federal judge in Washington, D.C., court documents have shown.

According to Peoples Gazette, the materials were delivered to Judge Beryl Howell of the US District Court for the District of Columbia under seal, meaning they are currently accessible only to the court as it considers whether to make the records public.

The submission followed a prolonged legal battle over a Freedom of Information Act request filed by American transparency campaigner Aaron Greenspan, who has been seeking access to Tinubu’s records from the FBI.

Court filings indicated that the bureau delivered the documents on Friday, August 28, after Howell ordered it to explain its continued refusal to release the records.

The documents were submitted without notifying Greenspan of their contents.

According to the filing, the records were “hand delivered to the Court on August 28, 2026 in compliance with this Court’s Minute Order dated August 20, 2026.”

Greenspan had originally sought the records through a FOIA application submitted in 2023. He worked with Nigerian journalist David Hundeyin in pursuing the request.

The case later became a dispute over how quickly the FBI was processing the request, with the agency repeatedly asking for more time.

Howell reportedly gave the FBI several opportunities to explain why it was withholding the records but grew increasingly dissatisfied with the delays.

The judge eventually set August 28 as the deadline for the bureau to comply with her directive.

See also  Police Dismiss Reports Of IGP’s Shoot-On-Sight Order

The bureau had argued earlier that releasing the records could infringe on Tinubu’s privacy rights.

It also maintained that the Freedom of Information Act was primarily intended to promote transparency concerning government operations and records, rather than provide unrestricted access to information about private individuals.

The controversy surrounding the records dates back several years and is linked to allegations concerning Tinubu’s activities in the United States in the early 1990s.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Why My FBI, DEA Records Should Remain Secret – Tinubu Tells US Court

Published

on

President Bola Tinubu has given the United States District Court for the District of Columbia four reasons why his records with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) should not be released.

It was reports that the president gave his reasons in filings by his lawyers, Christopher Carmichael, Victor Henderson and Oluwole Afolabi.

He argued that the US Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act precluded disclosure and there was no public interest in the matter.

Tinubu also said there was no public interest to balance and the plaintiff had ulterior motives for demanding documents with his name on them.

The President’s submission was in response to a request by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan, which sought disclosure of the records under the US Freedom of Information Act.

Greenspan had argued that his requests concerned the “sitting President of Nigeria…” and “a nation of over 230 million people whose daily lives are directly affected by President Tinubu’s decisions”.

Tinubu, according to filings by his lawyer, urged the US District Court to reject the bid because it amounted to an attempt to obtain private information for political purposes in Nigeria.

The President’s lawyers noted that the request sought access to information about government activities.

They specifically rejected the argument that Nigerians’ interest in Tinubu’s background constituted a public interest recognised by US law.

The team also rejected an argument on the President’s fitness for office, stating that “the asserted ‘public interest in Tinubu’s own fitness for office’ is not an interest FOIA recognises or one that needs to be balanced.”

See also  Senate set to grill new service chiefs today

The lawyers further argued that the records sought were protected by privacy provisions under FOIA and the US Privacy Act.

“The redacted information sought by the plaintiff is exempt from disclosure,” they stated, citing Exemption 7(C), which protects personal information contained in law-enforcement records.

The President’s legal team relied on a 1989 US Supreme Court decision, Department of Justice v Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, to argue that FOIA was designed to allow the public to know “what the government is up to” rather than provide access to information about private citizens.

They argued that Greenspan was seeking “disclosure of information about private citizens that is accumulated in various governmental files,” which, they said, “reveals little or nothing about an agency’s own conduct.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu’s FBI Records: ADC, NDC Demand Release, Say Nigerians Deserve Truth

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s records with United States law enforcement agencies has taken another turn with opposition parties demanding that the documents be made public.

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) have questioned the President’s decision to oppose the release of the records, insisting that Nigerians deserve to know the truth about his past.

Naija News reports that the fresh controversy comes as details of submissions made by Tinubu’s lawyers before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia emerged.

In the filings, the President’s legal team, led by Christopher Carmichael, Victor Henderson and Oluwole Afolabi, gave reasons why his unredacted records with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) should not be released to the public.

Tinubu’s lawyers argued that the records were protected under the US Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.

The legal team maintained that the information being sought contained private details from law enforcement files and therefore fell under provisions that exempt such records from public disclosure.

The lawyers also argued that there was no recognized public interest under US law strong enough to justify releasing the records.

According to them, the argument that Nigerians have an interest in knowing about Tinubu’s background does not amount to the kind of public interest recognized under the Freedom of Information Act.

They further rejected the argument that the documents could be necessary to determine the President’s fitness for public office, saying such an interest was not one that the US law was designed to address.

See also  AU, Others Reject Israel’s Recognition Of Somaliland As Independent State

Tinubu’s legal team also questioned the motive behind the request, arguing that the documents were being sought largely for political purposes in Nigeria.

The lawyers said the filings by the American transparency activist, Aaron Greenspan, showed that his main interest was obtaining government documents bearing Tinubu’s name.

They urged the court not to allow the FOIA process to be used as a means of accessing private information about an individual simply because he is the President of Nigeria.

The legal team also dismissed suggestions that the records could expose a secret prosecution or an agreement by US authorities not to prosecute Tinubu, describing such claims as speculative and unsupported by evidence.

The lawyers further argued that the fact that some information about Tinubu’s past had previously entered the public domain did not automatically remove his right to privacy over other details contained in government files.

The President Should Come Out Clean – ADC

Reacting to the development, ADC spokesperson, Bolaji Abdullahi, described the President’s opposition to the release of the records as suspicious.

Abdullahi, who spoke with a correspondent on Saturday, said Tinubu should allow the records to be released if he wanted to put the controversy surrounding his past to rest.

“Why is the President opposing the release of his past records? That is suspicious. The President should allow them (records) to be released to clear himself.

“The President should come out clean. He should be the one calling for the records to be released if he has nothing to hide because this is not good for him and the image of the country,” he said.

See also  Ghana recalls envoy to Nigeria over alleged electoral malpractice

Nigerians Deserve To Know – Says NDC

The National Publicity Secretary of the NDC, Osa Director, also called on the President to allow the records to be made public.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Saturday, Director rejected the argument that the request for Tinubu’s records was simply a political move by the opposition.

According to him, the President should use the opportunity to clear the air over an issue that has remained in the public domain for more than two decades.

“When a man commits an offence and he says, please, don’t blame me because it is the devil, does that mean he should not face the consequence of his action because it is the devil? That is the question the President should answer.

“Whether it is the opposition or not, if the issue wasn’t there, the opposition would not capitalise on it. Why did the opposition not ask the FBI to release records on our presidential candidate, Peter Obi, or Atiku? That is not an excuse,” Director said.

He argued that the controversy would continue to resurface as long as the matter remained unresolved.

“Nigerians deserve to know and in the interest of the President. He deserves to clear the air. This case has been hanging on since his time as a governor. It is over 20 years.

“Even me, as an opposition, am getting bored. It is time, once and for all, that he should clear the air to allow the issue to be buried,” he added.

Naija News reports that the controversy over Tinubu’s US records dates back several years and became a major political issue during the build-up to the 2023 presidential election.

See also  Police Dismiss Reports Of IGP’s Shoot-On-Sight Order

At the centre of the matter are records relating to a 1993 US civil forfeiture proceeding involving $460,000 held in an account linked to Tinubu.

US authorities had alleged that the funds represented proceeds of narcotics trafficking or were connected to prohibited financial transactions.

Meanwhile, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) had maintained during the presidential election litigation that the case was a civil forfeiture proceeding and did not amount to a criminal conviction.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending