Connect with us

News

Atiku demands probe of N17.5tn pipeline security spending

Published

on

Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has criticised the administration of President Bola Tinubu for spending N17.5tn on pipeline security and related expenditures in a single year, demanding a probe of what he described as a financial scandal and “a moral indictment on the Tinubu administration”.

In a statement issued by the Atiku Media Office on Sunday, the former Vice President noted that the expenditure exceeds 12 years of Nigeria’s fuel subsidy, arguing that it primarily benefits the President’s associates and political allies.

“The report that the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited spent a humongous N17.5tn in just 12 months on ‘securing fuel pipelines and others’ stands as one of the most brazen financial scandals in our nation’s history,” Atiku said.

He contrasted this with the N18tn spent on fuel subsidies over 12 years, a programme that cushioned millions of Nigerians, stabilised transport costs, and kept food prices manageable.

According to Atiku, “under President Bola Tinubu, the country has now expended nearly the same amount in a single year on opaque pipeline security contracts awarded to private firms tied to associates and cronies of the President.”

Describing the spending as “grand larceny dressed as public expenditure,” the statement criticised the government for removing petroleum subsidies while channeling massive funds into “energy-security” and “under-recovery” costs.

“In some places, a litre of Premium Motor Spirit now costs over N1,000. Yet, according to NNPCL records, the administration spent N7.13tn on ‘energy-security costs’ to stabilise petrol prices and another N8.67tn on ‘under-recovery,’” the statement said.

It further alleged that these categories are used to obscure the true beneficiaries of the spending.

Atiku called on the Federal Government to disclose the companies awarded these contracts, the scope and deliverables of each project, and urged that the N17.5tn expenditure be subjected to an independent forensic audit.

See also  Why Nigerian Airports Do Not Have Wi-Fi – Tinubu’s Minister, Keyamo Explains

He also called for a halt to further disbursement until accountability is established.

He posed several questions to the government, including what justifies a 38.7 per cent rise in energy-cost from N6.25tn in 2024 to N8.67tn in 2025; why pipeline security is now more expensive than a decade-long subsidy that served over 200 million Nigerians; and where the audit reports, parliamentary oversight findings, and cost-validation documents are.

Atiku argued that no administration presiding over such fiscal recklessness has the moral authority to demand sacrifices from Nigerians, who continue to grapple with high inflation, surging fuel prices, naira volatility, and widespread hunger.

He added, “Nigerians deserve transparency, not deceit. They deserve leadership, not cronyism. And they deserve a government that places national interest above private enrichment. N17.5tn pipeline-security expenditure is not merely a financial anomaly, it is a moral indictment on the Tinubu administration and a clarion call for full accountability.”

According to NNPCL’s 2024 audited financial statements, the N17.5tn charge to the federation includes energy-security costs of N7.13tn, intended to stabilise petrol prices; under-recovery of N8.67tn, representing the gap between actual import costs and regulated pump prices; and other receivables from the federation amounting to N8.84tn, covering advances and additional security-related costs for oil and gas infrastructure protection.

Part of this expenditure is reportedly allocated to pipeline surveillance, repairs, crude-theft prevention, and broader security operations.

While legitimate energy security spending can be justified to protect critical infrastructure and ensure stable fuel supply, the lack of transparency regarding beneficiaries and contract details raises serious concerns over cronyism and misallocation of resources, especially amid pressing national needs in power, healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

See also  2027: Atiku delays ADC membership card collection amid rumoured Jonathan comeback

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG names 10-member panel to probe deaths of 37 NSCDC detainees

Published

on

The Federal Government has constituted a 10-member independent committee to investigate the deaths of 37 people detained by the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps in Niger State over suspected illegal mining.

The Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, announced the constitution of the committee on Saturday, following a directive by President Bola Tinubu for a comprehensive investigation into the incident.

The 37 detainees died on Thursday, September 17, 2026, while in the custody of the NSCDC Niger State Command.

The cause of the deaths has not been established, with authorities ordering investigations to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident.

In a statement signed by the minister, the government said the committee would establish the identities of the deceased and investigate their arrests, detention and the cause and circumstances of their deaths.

It would also determine responsibility, complicity, negligence and misconduct, as well as recommend appropriate action, compensation where applicable and measures to prevent a recurrence.

“Any attempt to destroy or conceal evidence, intimidate witnesses or obstruct the investigation will be treated as a serious offence,” he said.

The committee is chaired by retired Deputy Director-General of the Department of State Services, Jonathan Kure, while Professor Isa Hayatu Chiroma (SAN), former Director-General of the Nigerian Law School, will serve as secretary.

Other members include retired AIG Hosea Hassan Karma; Professor Olayinka Buhari, a professor of Histopathology and former Chief Medical Director of the University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital; a representative of the Minna Emirate Council; and a representative of the Niger State Government.

The committee also includes Alhaji Liman Sulaiman, National Secretary of the Miners Association of Nigeria; lawyer and human rights activist Deji Adeyanju; Mrs Zainab Suleiman Okino of Blueprint Newspaper; and public affairs analyst, Dr George Agbakahi.

See also  Temitope Osoba died at police station, says late Nollywood actress’ fiancé

According to the statement, the committee may co-opt relevant experts, access facilities and documents, visit relevant locations and request memoranda from members of the public.

It has two weeks to complete its work and submit its report to the minister.

The minister also expressed condolences to the families of the deceased and appealed for calm while the investigation continues.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Oriire: Abductors fed us only when convenient for them – DSS witness tells court

Published

on

The witness of the Department of State Service, DSS in the ongoing trial of five alleged Ansaru terror group members on Friday, September 18 told the Federal High Court in Abuja that their abductors fed them only when it was convenient for them.

The witness code named AAA who was one of the victims of Orire school abduction said they were seriously traumatised during and after their ordeal that lasted 56 days.

Under cross examination by the counsel to the five accused persons Mr Bala Dakum, the witness said they were offered food by the abductors at their own convenient time despite the presence of little children of 18 months among them.

She admitted that the alleged kidnappers used the mobile phone of the victims to contact government officials but said she did not know the phone number of the government officials that were called.

She further told the court that upon their rescue by security operatives, she was interrogated by DSS operatives in their office and also while in the hospital.

Answering a question, the witness admitted that the three out of the five defendants on trial were with them in the forest while she got to know the other two during interrogation at the DSS office.

She also told the court that Michael Oyedokun and John Olaleye were killed at camp A and Camp B respectively but that she was not present at the scene where they were beheaded.

The witness further told the court that because she was not at the scene where the two teachers were beheaded, she did not know the specific kidnappers that carried out the killing.

See also  Fubara cancels N134b secretariat contract awarded by Ibas, orders refund

Meanwhile justice Salim Olasupo Ibrahim has fixed October 12 and 13 for continuation of trial of the five accused person.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Protesters March Against Sunday Igboho’s Iru Ekun Security Outfit In Oyo, Allege Tribal Discrimination

Published

on

group of protesters on Friday took to the streets in Oyo State to demonstrate against the Iru Ekun Security Network, a private security outfit associated with Yoruba Nation activist Sunday Adeyemo, popularly known as Sunday Igboho.

The protesters, who carried placards, accused the security outfit of allegedly discriminating against people from some ethnic groups and called for equal treatment of all residents irrespective of their tribe or background.

Some of the placards displayed during the protest read: “Say No To Iru Ekun, Crime Knows No Tribe,” “A Criminal Is A Criminal. One Nation, One People, One Nigeria,” and “Our Diversity Is Our Strength.”

The demonstration comes amid growing public debate and criticism surrounding the activities and methods of the Iru Ekun Security Network, particularly concerns over the role of privately organised security groups and their relationship with formal law-enforcement agencies.

The latest controversy followed an incident in Oyo State in which Iru Ekun operatives were accused of obstructing police officers who were attempting to arrest a suspect in Ibadan.

A rights group, Vocalpoint Human Rights Initiative (VOHRI), on Wednesday warned against allowing Iru Ekun or any other private group to operate as a parallel law-enforcement institution.

The group said no individual or organisation should be allowed to determine who should be arrested or punished without lawful authority and due process.

The criticism also comes after reports of confrontations involving Iru Ekun operatives during security operations in Oyo State.

In June, members of the group reportedly came under attack during a surveillance operation in the Old Oyo National Park while searching for suspected kidnappers and armed criminals. Igboho subsequently vowed that the group would continue its anti-kidnapping operations in the South-West.

See also  By-elections: APC sweeps Nasarawa, Enugu, Kano, Ondo, PDP holds Rivers

Iru Ekun was established by Igboho as a community security initiative aimed at tackling kidnapping, banditry and other criminal activities across parts of the South-West.

At the launch of the Lagos chapter earlier this month, Igboho directed members of the network operating in Lagos, Oyo, Ogun, Ondo and Ekiti states to intensify efforts against criminality.

According to reports, Igboho said the group would confront anyone threatening peace and security regardless of ethnic or religious affiliation and urged its members to operate within the law.

However, critics have continued to question the structure, accountability and methods of the privately organised security network, particularly given the existence of established state security structures such as the police and Amotekun.

A recent commentary published by Nigerian Tribune also raised concerns about the regulation and oversight of Iru Ekun, while discussing Igboho’s growing involvement in regional security matters.

The protesters’ demonstration on Friday adds a new dimension to the debate, with the placards emphasising ethnic inclusiveness and warning against treating crime through a tribal lens.

The protesters called for security operations to be conducted without discrimination, insisting that criminality should be addressed based on individual conduct rather than ethnic identity.

Source: Saharareporters

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending