Connect with us

News

Reps probe tax law tweaks, PDP demands suspension

Published

on

The House of Representatives on Thursday constituted an ad hoc committee to probe the alleged discrepancies in the tax reforms passed by the parliament and the official gazetted copy currently in circulation across government agencies.

This was as the Peoples Democratic Party demanded that the Federal Government further shift forward by six months the  January 1, 2026 take-off of the new tax law.

The opposition party said the shift became important following an alleged illegal alteration made to the law passed by the  National Assembly.

The PDP added that the six-month shift would allow for “sufficient enlightenment campaigns on the new Act.”

President Bola Tinubu recently signed four major tax reform bills into law, marking what the government has described as the most significant overhaul of Nigeria’s tax system in decades.

The laws include the Nigeria Tax Act, the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act and the Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Act, all operating under a single authority, the Nigeria Revenue Service.

The reforms are designed to simplify tax compliance, expand the tax base, eliminate overlapping taxes and modernise revenue collection across federal, state and local governments.

The laws are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026, following a six-month transition period for public education and system alignment.

However, the reforms have continued to attract mixed reactions nationwide.

On Wednesay, a PDP lawmaker from Sokoto State,  Abdussamad Dasuki,  drew the attention of the House of Representatives to alleged discrepancies in the tax reforms passed by the National Assembly and the copy gazetted by the Federal Government.

Dasuki warned that if not addressed, the alterations would render the new tax laws legally vulnerable as they lack legislative approval.

At the resumption of plenary on Thursday, the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, underscored the seriousness of the allegations by announcing a seven-man ad hoc committee to investigate the claims and submit a report to the House for further legislative action.

See also  PHOTOS: Scientists discover 1,300-year-old Jesus bread

He said, “On the revised tax laws, the House leadership has unanimously agreed that a committee should be set up immediately to look into the matters that were raised and many others. In that respect, I’m happy to announce to you that the following members have been appointed to the committee. They are Mukhtar Betara as Chairman, Idris Wase, James Faleke, Sada Soli, Igariwey Iduma, Fredrick Agbedi and Babajimi Benson.”

At Wednesday’s plenary, Dasuki had called on the House to revisit the gazetted version of the law and compare to what the National Assembly passed.

“I plead that all the documents should be brought before the Committee of the Whole so that we can make the relevant amendments.

“This is a breach of the Constitution and our laws, and this should not be taken by this Honorable House,” he added.

In response to the allegation, the PDP, on Thursday, commended Dasuki “for his fastidiousness and courage in the discharge of his legislative duties.”

It demanded “that the commencement date of the Tax Act be shifted from January 1, 2026, for at least six months to allow sufficient time for the investigation of this anomaly.”

The PDP warned that the disparity must be comprehensively investigated “and not treated with the customary levity this administration has shown towards serious issues of governance.”

“Nigerians are interested in knowing how these insertions and substitutions found their way into the gazetted copy. The leadership of the House of Representatives must not attempt to sweep this matter under the carpet, as it has allegedly done with the now widespread rumour that the country is operating two budgets within a single fiscal year.

“This criminal act of inserting unenacted sections into laws can erode public trust in parliamentary enactments. Nigerians deserve assurance that the laws they obey are those validly passed by their elected representatives, not provisions foreign to lawmakers,” the PDP said.

See also  Senate approves Tinubu’s N1.15tn domestic loan to fill 2025 budget gap

The PDP’s call comes a date after the National Opposition Movement, on Wednesdaym demanded the immediate suspension of the tax plan’s implementation, warning that forcing it through would worsen the living conditions of Nigerians.

Addressing a press conference on Wednesday at the Yar’Adua Centre, Abuja, the NOM spokesperson, Chille Igbawua, said Nigerians were already struggling with poverty, unemployment and rising living costs, insisting the new tax regime would be punitive.

The NOM, a coalition of citizens drawn from various opposition parties, said it monitors policies affecting Nigeria’s security, economy and overall prosperity under the Tinubu administration, while advocating national liberation and transformation.

Igbawua described the planned implementation as “shocking” and “punitive,” arguing that Nigerians are already struggling to meet basic needs.

“This new tax plan must not take off now. Its implementation must be suspended immediately. This is not tax reform; it is a weapon fashioned against the economic well-being and social security of suffering Nigerians,” he said.

“You cannot tax hunger. You cannot tax poverty. And you cannot tax people into prosperity. Since coming to office, President Tinubu has shown that his priorities are not with ordinary Nigerians but with a few oligarchs tied to his economic and political interests.”

But the Federal Government, on Thursday, pushed back, alleging that some individuals were attempting to undermine the success of ongoing tax reforms, insisting that the policies are pro-poor and aimed at recalibrating national revenue generation.

The Special Adviser to the President on Economic Affairs, Tope Fasua, made the allegation on Thursday during the inauguration of a Joint Committee of the National Orientation Agency and the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms in Abuja.

“We must state clearly that this is a pro-poor policy — one designed to recalibrate the revenue of this country in a way that ensures the poorest Nigerians are not harmed, except positively,” Fasua said.

He stressed that the reforms were not intended to increase the tax burden on citizens or small businesses, citing the partial opening of the Brass–Nembe Road as an example of infrastructure development made possible through improved revenue mobilisation.

See also  Again, US to deport 18 Nigerians on criminal list

“Recently, the Brass–Nembe Road was partially opened. That is the kind of progress we can expect when revenue and tax systems work better. We will also continue to draw lessons from how other countries have implemented similar reforms,” Fasua added.

Earlier, the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, had said during a courtesy visit to the NOA that the reforms were designed to ease, rather than worsen, the burden on Nigerians. He lamented that widespread misinformation had continued to fuel unnecessary fear and anger over the policies.

Implementation of the reforms is scheduled to begin on January 1, 2026. Key provisions include tax exemptions for small businesses, reduced tax burdens for workers and the middle class, lower corporate tax rates, harmonisation of multiple taxes across federal, state and local governments, streamlined compliance processes, and the elimination of nuisance taxes to encourage investment.

Also speaking, the Director-General of the NOA, Lanre Issa-Onilu, represented by the Director of Planning, Research and Statistics, Nura Kobi, said the agency would deploy its 16 communication platforms across the 774 local government areas to address public misconceptions about the new tax laws.

Issa-Onilu said that although the reforms are scheduled to commence on January 1, 2026, it is crucial for Nigerians to clearly understand what the policies mean, why they are necessary, and how they will be implemented.

“Across the world, public policies rarely fail because they are poorly designed; they fail because they are poorly communicated,” he said. “When the message is not understood, the messenger must return.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FG deploys mining marshals for intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring

Published

on

The Federal Government has deployed Mining Marshals for intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring and operational oversight in the solid minerals sector.

This was disclosed in a statement issued on Tuesday by the Commander of Mining Marshals Operations and Assistant Commandant of Corps, Attah Onoja.

Onoja stated that the deployment is part of efforts to strengthen enforcement against illegal mining activities.

“The Mining Marshals are now participating in investigations, intelligence gathering, compliance monitoring and fact-finding missions conducted by the Federal Ministry of Solid Minerals Development.

“As part of the initiative, the Mining Marshals recently joined ministry officials on operational visits to mining sites in Nasarawa and Plateau states.

“The operations were carried out under the leadership of the Minister of Solid Minerals Development, Dele Alake,” the statement read.

The statement said that the operations were aimed at strengthening monitoring, regulatory compliance and operational oversight within the sector.

It read, “The team was led on different occasions by the Permanent Secretary of the ministry, Engr. Faruk Yusuf Yabo, who represented the minister during the field engagements.

“During one of the operational and fact-finding missions, the Commander of the Mining Marshals, ACC Attah John Onoja, accompanied ministry officials to a mining site allegedly being illegally exploited.

“The visit was part of efforts to verify allegations of unlawful mining activities, assess compliance with extant mining regulations and obtain field-based information necessary for administrative, regulatory and possible enforcement actions.”

“The delegation also included senior ministry officials such as Engr. Frank Odoom, Director of Special Duties; Engr. Imam A. Ganiyu, Director of Mines Inspectorate; Andrew Zubiri, Director of Legal Services; and Ibrahim Abdulmajeed J., representing the Director General of the Mining Cadastre Office.”

See also  Bill, Hillary Clinton to testify in US House Epstein probe

According to the statement, the engagements created an important feedback mechanism between government authorities and mining communities.

It added that the engagements enabled concerns relating to illegal mining, environmental practices, security challenges and regulatory compliance to be communicated directly to authorities.

It further stated that the Mining Marshals have continued to support the ministry’s operations through “intelligence support, operational collaboration and inter-agency coordination across mining communities nationwide.”

Continue Reading

News

Outrage as EFCC operatives assault UNIUYO doctor, workers over medical report

Published

on

Outrage has followed the alleged assault and arrest of four staff members of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Akwa Ibom State, including the Deputy Chairman, Medical Advisory, Effiong Ekpe, a professor of cardiothoracic surgery, during an investigation involving the verification of a medical report submitted by a fraud suspect.

The incident followed a visit to the hospital by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Tuesday.

PUNCH Online reported that the EFCC operatives arrived at the hospital premises in the afternoon and attempted to arrest a staff member, leading to resistance from workers and other hospital personnel.

Eyewitnesses alleged that the operatives later called for reinforcement and that additional officers fired shots into the air to disperse workers who gathered at the scene.

According to PUNCH Online, the operatives eventually took away Ekpe, and three other staff members.

Some persons were reportedly injured during the incident, while phones were said to have been damaged as workers tried to record the scene.

In a statement obtained by PUNCH Metro on X on Tuesday, the EFCC admitted that its operatives visited the hospital to authenticate a medical report submitted by a suspect standing trial before Justice M.A. Onyetunu of the Federal High Court in Uyo over alleged fraud involving several microfinance banks, including the University of Uyo Microfinance Bank.

“The suspect had presented a medical report which required authentication by the UUTH management. The Commission wrote two different letters, dated March 11, 2026, and April 20, 2026, to the hospital management to this effect without receiving any response,” the agency stated.

See also  Was government’s hyper reaction to Sowore’s protest necessary?

The anti-graft agency noted that its investigating officer later visited the hospital to follow up on the request but still received no response.

“As a last resort, operatives of the commission visited the chief medical director of the hospital on Tuesday to make further enquiries, only to be locked in with a false alarm and subjected to an unprovoked attack by misguided staff of the facility who pelted them with stones and other dangerous objects,” the statement added.

The EFCC also alleged that the hospital management shut the gates against its operatives despite intervention from the police.

“Police authorities in Akwa Ibom State advised the CMD to open the hospital gates to enable the operatives to exit the premises peacefully, but the entreaties were turned down,” it said.

The agency insisted that its operatives acted professionally and did not disrupt hospital activities. It also warned that obstructing lawful investigations could attract legal consequences.

Meanwhile, medical doctors and health workers at the hospital have declared an indefinite strike over the incident.

The chairman of the Nigerian Medical Association in Akwa Ibom State, Dr Aniekan Peters, reportedly directed doctors across the state to suspend services, while the Joint Health Sector Unions also announced a total shutdown of hospital activities in protest.

Speaking on the development, the Public Relations Officer of the NMA in the state, Dr Gabriel Eyo, described the incident as an attack on the hospital and its workers.

“In the early hours of this morning, masked men wearing EFCC jackets stormed into the hospital premises, walked into the office of the Deputy Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee, Prof. Effiong Ekpe, and beat him to a pulp,” Eyo alleged.

See also  EFCC recovered N500bn, secured 7,000 convictions under my watch – Tinubu

“They dragged him like a common criminal. When members of staff, students and other health workers tried to resist them, they shot sporadically into the air and dispersed the crowd with tear gas,” he added.

‘Eyo said Ekpe, a professor of cardiothoracic surgery, ‘was allegedly injured during the incident.’

“Whatever he did, there is a due process for this kind of thing. Even criminals are not treated this way. The only thing that should have been done would have been to send an invitation, which was not done,” he stated.

He added that the incident was traumatic for workers and patients, noting that the NMA had begun an indefinite strike in protest.

Reacting to the claims, the Commissioner of Police in Akwa Ibom State, Baba Azare, said police officers only accompanied the EFCC officials to verify the operation after the hospital management contacted him.

“The EFCC went for an arrest in the hospital this morning, and the CMD called me to verify if my men were among those in the hospital,” he said.

Azare explained that he later confirmed from the EFCC that the officers were acting on a court order linked to an ongoing case.

“I called the CMD and advised him to open the gate for them to carry that man because it is a legitimate duty,” he added.

The incident has also sparked reactions on social media, with several Nigerians criticising the EFCC’s conduct and describing it as an excessive use of force.

One X user, Richard David, questioned the agency’s priorities, writing, “When EFCC claimed that they did not know CBEX officials who scammed nearly one million Nigerians were operating, some of you were talking down on the victims. Now the EFCC has burst the safe haven of a hospital where your sick loved ones are and you are shouting?”

See also  Again, US to deport 18 Nigerians on criminal list

Another X user, identified as @Shaibu, described the incident as “shameful and disgraceful.”

“You came to the hospital requesting their expertise, and somehow you are trying to justify intimidation. Even if the doctor or healthcare worker is the suspect, the EFCC can only arrest when they have a warrant. Choosing not to cooperate with the EFCC is not a crime,” the user wrote.

Another X user, @MaduforUch2532, argued that hospitals operate under strict protocols and security procedures.

“A hospital is not a criminal hideout. Medical institutions have protocols, patient privacy obligations and security procedures. Staff reacting to unidentified masked men within hospital premises is not surprising,” the user stated.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Coup plotters reached out for spiritual cover — Cleric

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday watched a video recording in which an Islamic cleric, standing trial over the coup plot, told investigators that he warned the suspected conspirators that their plan would fail and that they would eventually be betrayed.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik also ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness of statements and video recordings the prosecution sought to tender against the six defendants.

The ruling followed objections by defence lawyers, who argued that the statements were obtained in violation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and the Anti-Torture Act.

The Federal Government had on April 22 arraigned six defendants, including a retired major-general, over allegations of treason, terrorism, money laundering and conspiracy to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s government.

The defendants are Maj-Gen Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (retd.); Navy Capt Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (retd.); police inspector Ahmed Ibrahim; Presidential Villa electrician Zekeri Umoru; Bukar Kashim Goni; and a Zaria-based Islamic cleric, Sheikh Abdulkadir Sani.

They all pleaded not guilty to the 13 charges.

At Monday’s proceedings, prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), informed the court that the fourth prosecution witness remained in the witness box and applied for the playback of a video recording containing the alleged statement of the sixth defendant, Sani.

In the video played in open court, Sani said he knew the alleged ringleader, Col Maaji, for less than one year and was introduced to him through a man identified as Sanda.

The cleric said Sanda approached him for prayers concerning a planned coup and informed him that his “oga” needed spiritual guidance and divination over the success of the operation.

According to Sani, after conducting prayers, he informed them that the operation would fail.

“I warned them the coup would fail,” he said in the recording.

He added that he also told them that two persons involved in the alleged conspiracy would eventually betray the group.

Sani further stated that Sanda later returned with another request for prayers “so that the two individuals would not betray the group.”

The cleric said money was subsequently transferred to him for prayers and charity, while the names of persons allegedly involved in the plot were also sent to him for inclusion in the prayers.

According to him, shortly after the prayers commenced, Sanda informed him that Col Maaji had not been seen for four days.

He added that he later learnt through media reports that arrests had been made over an alleged coup plot.

See also  Pressure mounts on Bayelsa gov over choice of deputy

Sani, however, maintained in the video that the money transferred to him was not payment for supporting a coup.

“The money was meant for prayers,” he told investigators.

He also admitted that he understood a coup to mean a military overthrow of government, but claimed he did not report the alleged plot because he did not know who to report to.

The cleric narrated that he was later arrested after visiting the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over restrictions placed on his bank account.

According to him, he discovered that the account had been flagged when he attempted to make withdrawals from the money sent to him.

He said that after contacting an EFCC deputy director, he was invited to the commission’s office, where he explained that the funds were meant for prayers.

Sani also stated in the recording that he did not make any statement relating to a coup while in EFCC custody.

Before the end of the video, the cleric confirmed that nobody assaulted or tortured him and that his “statements were made voluntarily.”

Following the playback, Oyedepo applied to tender extra-judicial statements allegedly made by the first to fifth defendants before a Special Investigation Panel and military police authorities, alongside Sani’s statement before military investigators.

The move was strongly opposed by lawyers representing all six defendants.

Muhammed Ndayako (SAN) appeared for the first defendant, while Paul Erokoro (SAN), A.H. Shehu, C.D. Okafor, M.A. Ibrahim, Olalekan Ojo (SAN), and Sanusi Musa (SAN) represented the other defendants.

The defence lawyers argued that the statements and accompanying video recordings were not voluntarily made and failed to comply with safeguards provided under the ACJA.

Some of the lawyers also relied on provisions of the Anti-Torture Act, 2017, alleging oppression, inducement and coercion during interrogation.

Counsel for the second defendant argued that his client was neither informed of his right to legal representation nor granted access to counsel before his statement was recorded.

The fourth defendant’s lawyer further argued that the video failed to establish whether his client’s legs were free during interrogation, insisting that coercion could not be ruled out.

Ojo, counsel for the fifth defendant, urged the court to order separate trial-within-trial proceedings for each defendant since all the accused persons were disputing the voluntariness of their statements.

Responding, Oyedepo said the prosecution was “not afraid of a trial within a trial.”

See also  EFCC recovered N500bn, secured 7,000 convictions under my watch – Tinubu

He, however, urged the court to conduct a single joint proceeding instead of separate hearings for each defendant.

After listening to the arguments, Justice Abdulmalik ruled that the court would conduct “a joint trial within a trial to determine the voluntariness of the statements.”

The judge subsequently adjourned the matter till May 12 for continuation of proceedings.

The prosecution had alleged that the defendants planned to attack the Presidential Villa, detain Tinubu and other top government officials, and take control of strategic institutions.

Investigators also alleged that no fewer than 32 vehicles were procured for covert operations linked to the alleged plot.

Relatives protest

Meanwhile, relatives and sympathisers of military officers standing trial over the coup plot staged a peaceful protest at the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja on Monday, demanding an open trial and the release of the detained suspects.

The demonstrators, who converged on the ministry’s entrance, chanted solidarity songs and displayed placards bearing inscriptions such as “Tinubu Release Our Heroes,” “Lt Col C Chima 419 Witness,” and “AGF, Stop the Kangaroo Court Martial Now.”

Security personnel, including operatives of the Nigeria Police Force, however, prevented the protesters from gaining access to the ministry premises, restricting them to the entrance gate.

The protest comes amid growing criticism over the handling of the coup trial, particularly after journalists were barred last week from covering proceedings involving some of the accused officers.

Addressing journalists during the protest, the leader of the demonstrators, Justice Isimili, said many of those present were relatives of the detained officers who travelled from different parts of the country.

“Many of the people who turned out today are relatives of our heroes. Some of them came from Jos, Kano and Sokoto to protest the continued detention of the alleged coup suspects who are our fathers, uncles and brothers.

“All we are asking is for the President, who is our father, to temper justice with mercy. We want him to come to our aid. Many of us have not been able to rest or do anything because of our loved ones who are still being held.”

He condemned what he described as the secretive nature of the ongoing court-martial proceedings.

“We want an open trial instead of what they are doing in the name of court martial, where family members, journalists and the public are denied access to the court proceedings. All we are interested in is their freedom,” he added.

See also  Bill, Hillary Clinton to testify in US House Epstein probe

Another protester, Abdullahi Kale, who claimed he travelled from Sokoto for the demonstration, alleged that the continued detention of the suspects was creating the impression that northern military officers were being targeted.

“No freedom, no second term. If the President and the AGF fail to release them, we will mobilise the North against Tinubu’s re-election,” he threatened.

A female protester, Habibat Muhammad, who carried her one-year-old child, Abba, on her back, also appealed for leniency.

Speaking in Hausa, she lamented that life had become difficult for many of the affected families since the suspects were arrested about eight months ago from their homes and military formations.

Responding to the protesters, a director in the ministry, who declined to disclose her name, urged the demonstrators to remain calm and orderly.

According to her, the ministry had yet to receive any formal letter detailing their grievances and demands.

“This is what we told them. They should go back and put their house in order before coming back.

“When you return, let only two persons come with your letter. But if you insist on coming as a group like you did today, it will be misrepresented to mean another thing.”

When pressed to reveal her identity, the official declined.

“On this issue, I can’t give a name. I am just a director in the ministry. What I have only come to offer them is an explanation, which has been done. That is all,” she stated.

The latest protest adds to earlier demonstrations by families of the detained officers, who have repeatedly demanded either their release or immediate arraignment in a transparent and public court process.

The controversy surrounding the trial deepened two weeks ago when journalists were barred from covering bail proceedings involving six of the suspects at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Court officials, backed by operatives of the Department of State Services, reportedly ordered reporters out of the courtroom shortly before proceedings began.

The suspects are facing charges bordering on treason, terrorism, money laundering and failure to disclose information.

While some serving military officers are being tried before a court-martial in Abuja, others are facing trial in civilian courts.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending