Connect with us

News

Kwara carnage: Maximising US security intervention

Published

on

NIGERIA has sunk to alarming depths of insecurity. Banditry, terrorism and organised criminality now spread across large swathes of the country.

Even more humiliating is the reality that foreign powers are increasingly stepping in to tackle threats the Nigerian state should have decisively confronted long ago.

This grim reality was underscored on Tuesday when a small team of United States troops arrived in Nigeria to support counterterrorism efforts.

Tragically, their arrival coincided with one of the bloodiest terror attacks recorded this year.

On the same day, bloodthirsty Boko Haram and Lakurawa insurgents massacred at least 162 people in Woro and Nuku communities in Kaiama Local Government Area of Kwara State.

The coordinated assault has since been described as the deadliest attack yet this year.

Amnesty International estimates that more than 170 people were killed in the two villages. The rights group rightly condemned the security lapses that enabled the carnage as unacceptable.

It revealed that the attackers had issued warning letters to residents for more than five months without any effective security response.

Eyewitness accounts paint a chilling picture. Gunmen suspected to be members of the Lakurawa group, an Islamic State affiliate, reportedly rounded up villagers, bound their hands behind their backs and executed them in cold blood.

Homes and shops were torched, leaving entire communities reduced to ashes. This was cruelty in its most barbaric form.

Many residents fled into the bush with gunshot wounds. Survivors said the terrorists had demanded allegiance to Sharia law instead of the Nigerian state. When the villagers refused, the killers struck.

See also  SGF issues formal correction on Tinubu ’s official title

The Kwara carnage was not an isolated incident. The country’s worsening insecurity was simultaneously felt in Katsina, Plateau, Benue and Borno states.

In Doma A and Doma B communities of Faskari Local Government Area in Katsina State, bandits slaughtered another 21 people on Tuesday.

In Benue State, the grim toll continued in Abande village, Kwande Local Government Area, where bandits murdered 17 people at a rural market, including a mobile police officer.

These repeated massacres expose Nigeria’s lack of capacity to protect its citizens.

The federal police force has become a hollow institution, weakened by years of neglect and the illegal deployment of nearly two-thirds of its personnel to VIP protection. Even a presidential directive to withdraw officers from elite protection has not been fully obeyed.

Across vast rural areas, there is little or no police or government presence. Terrorists now operate with impunity, collecting levies, abducting residents, and enforcing parallel authority.

Unsurprisingly, Nigeria now ranks sixth on the 2025 Global Terrorism Index.

Against this backdrop, US involvement has intensified. Last month, Washington announced the delivery of critical supplies to support Nigeria’s security efforts.

On December 25, US forces carried out airstrikes against Islamic State-linked terrorists in Sokoto State. Several fighters were killed, while others fled targeted locations.

The Donald Trump administration had earlier accused the Nigerian government of failing to protect Christians from terrorist violence, designating Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern.

Since 2009, Boko Haram, Islamic State West Africa Province and other terror groups have devastated Nigeria, particularly in the North. Vice-President Kashim Shettima estimates that more than 100,000 people have been killed, while millions have been displaced.

See also  Free Nnamdi Kanu: ‘Nigeria is only mimicking democracy’ – Farotimi

Following the December airstrikes, Trump indicated that further US military action was possible.

The head of the US Africa Command, Dagvin Anderson, confirmed that the current deployment followed an agreement to deepen cooperation against escalating terrorist threats across West Africa.

Defence Minister Christopher Musa said the US troops would assist Nigeria primarily with intelligence and training.

It is hoped that the deployment will enable decisive counter-offensives that degrade terrorist networks wherever they operate.

The killings in Katsina occurred despite peace deals previously brokered between bandits and communities in 11 violence-prone local government areas, including Faskari. This exposes the futility of negotiating with terrorists who view compromise as weakness.

Clearly, US intervention has come at a critical moment. But Nigeria must not delude itself into thinking salvation has arrived. The government must maximise this security cooperation and avoid the mistakes seen elsewhere, where foreign interventions deepened instability instead of resolving it.

Nigeria should broaden partnerships with other allies, including the United Kingdom, while recognising that US involvement is driven by enlightened self-interest, not charity.

Equally important is vigilance against fifth columnists within Nigeria’s security architecture who leak sensitive information to terrorists.

Ultimately, foreign assistance can only buy time. Nigeria must rebuild its own security capacity if it hopes to contain and defeat the scourge of terrorism threatening its existence.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  Bandits attacked Kwara community for 10 hours before soldiers arrived – Village head

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  Pay more attention to health, education, TUC tells Diri

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  Free Nnamdi Kanu: ‘Nigeria is only mimicking democracy’ – Farotimi

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  Bandits attacked Kwara community for 10 hours before soldiers arrived – Village head

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending