Connect with us

Politics

ADC convention: Mark, Atiku, Aregbesola tackle Tinubu on hardship, insecurity

Published

on

The embattled National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, former Senate President David Mark, former Governor Rauf Aregbesola, the ADC National Secretary and other party leaders have declared that there would be no easy victory for President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 general elections.

Speaking at the party’s national convention themed, ‘So That Nigeria May Work,’ held on Tuesday in Abuja, the ADC leaders strongly criticised the Tinubu-led administration over the worsening insecurity and economic hardship in the country, insisting that Nigerians were facing unprecedented levels of suffering.

Other ADC leaders, including former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, former Governors, Peter Obi (Anambra) and Rotimi Amaechi (Rivers), described the security situation as deteriorating, alleging that poverty has more than doubled under the present administration.

However, the faction of the ADC led by Nafiu Bala dismissed the Abuja convention, stating that their own bloc would hold a separate convention after the Supreme Court’s judgment.

On April 1, INEC announced the delisting of key ADC figures, including Mark and Aregbesola, from its official register. The commission explained that the action was taken in compliance with a court order directing it to preserve the status quo pending the final determination of the case at the trial court.

The party has faced a prolonged leadership crisis since 2025, when Mark’s group formed a new National Working Committee, which was contested by other factions within the ADC.

The dispute stemmed from disagreements over the tenure of former chairman Ralph Nwosu, which ended in August 2022. While Nwosu was said to have endorsed a 2025 transition plan, his deputy, Nafiu Gombe, insisted that he should assume the position of acting chairman after Nwosu’s exit.

The disagreement later escalated into factional struggles for control of the party, resulting in multiple legal battles at both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, and raising concerns about the ADC’s preparedness for the 2027 elections.

In response, Mark called for Amupitan’s resignation on April 2 and maintained that the party would proceed with its scheduled activities.

In a related development, a faction backed by the ADC’s 2023 presidential candidate, Dumebi Kachikwu, announced a caretaker committee during a National Executive Committee meeting convened by some state chairmen of the party.

As a result, the party is now split into three factions: one led by Mark representing the coalition bloc, another led by Gombe, and a NEC-backed group aligned with Kachikwu and headed by Kingsley Ogga, the Kogi State ADC chairman.

Despite these developments, Mark, Aregbesola and others were voted as members of ADC National Working Committee by over 3,000 delegates at the Abuja convention on Tuesday.

The convention also affirmed the National Working Committee led by Mark and adopted the party’s revised constitution and manifesto.

In his remarks, Mark, who declared that the ADC cannot be wished away or litigated into silence, added that the party belongs to the Nigerian people, and that Nigerians have shown their support by turning out in large numbers today.

He stated, “I say to those who orchestrated these obstacles: you have not weakened us; you have welded us together. Every attempt to suppress this party has only deepened the resolve of our members, widened our coalition, and reminded Nigerians why a strong opposition is not optional; it is essential to democracy’s survival.

Across Nigeria, there is a growing awareness by a generation that desires a different country, a country that nurtures their talents and supports their ambitions.

“This generation is asking tough questions of leadership and those who seek to lead. We are greatly delighted to see that under the harsh light of this scrutiny, the African Democratic Congress is emerging as a credible alternative, not necessarily because of who we are, but because our vision and ambition align with their own.

‘’The reason we are here, the genuine recommitment to putting the people first, is the very reason that they continue to believe, despite the daunting challenges they face today, that Nigeria, this great country, will rediscover itself.

See also  Dangote-NNPC deal hits great turbulence, see details

“We in the African Democratic Congress recognise this moment as a moment of great opportunity, as well as a moment of great responsibility. Our objective is not merely political success or a quest for power. We see it as a duty to ourselves and to posterity to demonstrate to all Nigerians that something good can come out of politics, and that democracy can actually deliver a better life than they seek. This is the fundamental goal of our party.’’

The former Senate President stated that in the ADC, the constitution will be supreme, adding that every member, regardless of position, will be accountable to the rules and values that define the party.

He continued, “No member of this party, no matter how highly placed, will be bigger than the party, and no member, no matter how lowly placed, will be ignored. This is my personal commitment to you all.

“In the ADC, we shall return politics to its true purpose: to improve the lives of the people. This is the central ideology of our party: to make life better for the people. The resources of Nigeria will be deployed in the service of the majority of Nigerians. We will invest in our people, make them more productive and more competitive. We will protect people and provide the environment for them to thrive.”

On his part, Aregbesola said President Tinubu ought to resign following the deteriorating insecurity and economic hardship in Nigeria.

“People who deliberately split the People’s Democratic Party are today being falsely roped in as political strategists. Since when has criminality become a strategy? The ADC does not, and we never owe its existence to any individual or group, including an electoral body masquerading as a neutral umpire with its leadership in the attire of political partisanship.’’

Aregbesola expressed concern that transportation costs have risen so sharply that it is now impractical for some workers to commute to work.

“Ordinarily, having made such a promise and fared woefully, an honest president should simply step down and not seek re-election. Rather, what we are witnessing is the most desperate attempt by a candidate in Nigerian electoral history to retain power at all costs, even if it means bringing down the entire democratic system. We have the duty to stop scammers from retaining power,’’ the ex-Tinubu ally railed.

He also cautioned that there would be no automatic or ceremonial ascension to power in the Presidential Villa in 2027.

“There will be no coronation in 2027. There will be no Kabiyesi in the Presidential Villa come 2027,” describing the president’s style of governance as autocratic, stating that under Tinubu, being in the opposition has effectively been treated as an offence.

Former Vice President Atiku declared that the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Joash Amupitan, would not escape accountability over allegations of being used to undermine democracy in Nigeria.

“I remember when the APC was being formed, the entire political leadership in this country came to my house. They said, ‘If you don’t come into the APC, this is not going to be possible.’ They literally compelled me to join the APC. Only for us to enter the APC, our economy is gone, our sovereignty is gone, our security is gone, our education is gone, and our infrastructure is gone. The healthcare is gone.

“Now, we must rise and make sure that there is change, genuine change, a serious change to rectify all these challenges that are happening in the country. I am in this game. We are going to win.’’

He added, “Let the chairman know we are not going to let him get away with his illegalities. We will not. And I hope we will have your support and cooperation to make sure we return to true democracy, to true development in all aspects of human endeavour.”

Obi stressed the need for Nigerians to come together in unity to salvage the country from Tinubu’s leadership.

See also  Health ministry orders immediate retirement of longstanding directors

He stated, “The country is so divided; we need unity. The present government has ensured that it will remain more divided. Your unity is important. Your country is collapsing, and if you allow it to go further, it will be worse. If you check your indices today, when the present government came into being, Nigeria’s ranking in terrorism was number eight.’’

A former Rivers State governor, Amaechi, lampooned the Tinubu administration, saying, ‘’How can a man who said he is a democrat, who claimed he fought on the side of NADECO, be stopping democracy? These guys don’t care. What they care about is money. That’s all they care about.

“They are using the institutions of government against the people of Nigeria. He doesn’t care. So, what kind of man is he? Let me repeat for those who attacked me.

If you, Nigerians, are not angry and hungry, I am. The situation is bad.

It’s terrible. And if you think President Tinubu will give you power, you are wasting your time. The ADC must come together. Decide on a viable candidate. It must be a viable candidate.’’

Reacting, Nafiu dismissed the convention by Mark’s bloc, describing it as illegitimate and a “mockery.”

Nafiu’s Chief of Staff, Bala Sani, said, “Of course, we are not in support of their (David Mark) convention. To us, it is a mockery and a joke. On our part, we are following the judgment of the Court of Appeal. That was why we stalled our planned convention and related activities pending the ruling or the judgment.

Sani explained that the Bala faction had earlier fixed dates for its convention, but was forced to suspend the process following INEC’s refusal to recognise Nafiu Gombe’s leadership.

“On the convention, we actually fixed a date for April 3 and later September 9, but had to hold on after INEC refused to recognise Nafiu Bala Gombe following the listing of the David Mark-led executives.

“As I said earlier, the convention has to be shelved pending the outcome of the court judgment. We, the law-abiding citizens, cannot do things outside the court’s directives or against the court’s judgments. So, we are waiting,” he stated.

Court adjourns appeal

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has fixed April 22 for the hearing of an appeal arising from the leadership crisis in the ADC.

The appeal was filed by David Mark, challenging earlier court decisions on the dispute.

A five-member panel of the apex court, led by Justice Mohammed Garba, fixed the date on Tuesday, after granting an accelerated hearing in the appeal marked SC/CV/180/2026.

The appeal is against the March 12 judgment of the Court of Appeal, which dismissed Mark’s earlier appeal challenging a September 4, 2025, ruling of the Federal High Court in Abuja.

In the earlier decision, Justice Emeka Nwite of the Federal High Court had refused to grant injunctive relief sought in an ex parte application filed by a chieftain of the party, Nafiu Gombe.

At Tuesday’s proceedings, the apex court directed Mark’s counsel, Jibril Okutepa (SAN), to file and serve the appellant’s brief within a short timeframe, in line with the accelerated hearing granted.

It also ordered the respondents to file their briefs within three days of service, while the appellant is to file a reply, if necessary, within one day after receiving the respondents’ processes.

Similarly, a Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday adjourned proceedings indefinitely in a suit FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025 challenging the David Mark leadership of the ADC, pending the determination of a jurisdictional dispute now before the Supreme Court.

Justice Nwite ordered that the matter be put on hold, despite strong arguments by parties urging the court to proceed with the hearing of the substantive case.

The decision followed submissions by counsel to the plaintiff, Nafiu, Lukman Fagbemi, on the effect of a pending interlocutory appeal filed by the second defendant, David Mark, challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court.

Earlier, Fagbemi informed the court that the Supreme Court had fixed April 22, 2026, for the hearing of the appeal after striking out an application for a stay of proceedings filed by the second defendant.

See also  Owed contractors threaten APC convention protest, see why

He urged the court to suspend further proceedings, arguing that the apex court was now seized of the issue of jurisdiction and that all parties were bound to await its decision.

However, his position was opposed by counsel to the first defendant (ADC), S.E. Aruwa, who maintained that there was no subsisting order staying proceedings.

Aruwa argued that the interlocutory appeal did not automatically operate as a stay and drew the court’s attention to the earlier ruling of the Court of Appeal directing accelerated hearing of the case.

He further relied on section 83(6)(a) of the Electoral Act 2026, submitting that the matter was time-sensitive in view of the 2027 general election timetable and the imminent commencement of party primaries.

Counsel to David Mark, Suleiman Usman, as well as counsel to the third defendant (Rauf Aregbesola) and fifth defendant (Ralph Nwosu), aligned with the position that the court could proceed with a hearing, particularly in the absence of any order staying proceedings.

They urged the court to at least take pending applications or even hear the substantive suit, while reserving judgment until the Supreme Court delivers its ruling.

Despite the consensus among the parties, Nwite held that the circumstances of the case required judicial restraint.

The judge noted that the facts presented by counsel were largely undisputed but emphasised that the core issue before the Supreme Court bordered on the jurisdiction of the trial court.

“I am of the view, and I so hold, that it would not serve any purpose if the jurisdiction of this honourable court is being challenged at the apex court,” he said.

Nwite further held that proceeding with the matter in the face of the pending appeal would be inappropriate.

“Therefore, the reasonable thing to do is to await the decision of the Supreme Court,” he added.

In another related matter, a Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday ordered parties in a suit challenging the leadership structure of the ADC to maintain the status quo and refrain from taking any further steps that could undermine the case before it.

The suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/581/2026, was instituted by seven plaintiffs—Don Obinna, Johnny Derek, Obah Ehigiator, Olona Yinka, Dr Charles  Omideji, Samuel Gyang, and Obianyo Patrick—who sued on behalf of themselves and “all the state chairmen and the State Executive Committees of ADC.”

Joined as defendants are the ADC, David Mark, Senator Patricia Akwashiki, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, Prof. Oserheimen Osunbor, and the Independent National Electoral Commission.

At the resumed hearing, counsel for the 6th defendant, Mr Marcel Ebinine, moved an oral application seeking an adjournment to enable his client to respond to the originating processes filed by the plaintiffs.

Following the application, Justice Joyce Abdulmalik granted the request but issued consequential directives aimed at preserving the subject matter of the litigation pending determination of the substantive suit.

The court held that all pending applications would be heard together with the substantive matter, noting that the processes were “all fought on affidavit evidence.”

Justice Abdulmalik ordered that all parties should file their consequential processes to ensure progress at the next date.

The judge further directed strict restraint on all parties in the dispute, warning against any action that could prejudice the proceedings.

“I also order that all parties in this suit shall maintain the status quo ante bellum and shall not take further steps in this matter so as not to render nugatory the proceedings before the court,” the order stated.

In addition, the court mandated proper service on all parties to ensure an effective hearing. The matter was subsequently adjourned to April 23, 2026, for a definite hearing.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

APC, PDP trade words over Pantami’s political membership status

Published

on

A fresh controversy has erupted in Gombe State over the political status of former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Ali Pantami, as the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party laid conflicting claims to his party membership.

The dispute followed Pantami’s emergence as the PDP governorship candidate ahead of the 2027 general elections, after the APC primary election produced Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The Gombe State chapter of the PDP insisted that Pantami had validly resigned from the APC and is now a bona fide member of the opposition party.

The APC, however, maintained that the former minister remains its member because due process was allegedly not followed in effecting his resignation.

Addressing journalists in Gombe on Tuesday, the APC Publicity Secretary, Moses Kyari, said the party’s executive committee in Pantami Ward had earlier clarified that it neither received nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Pantami.

“As you may recall, 25 out of the 27 members of the ward executive committee publicly stated that they neither saw nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Professor Ali Isa Pantami.

“They maintained that the claim was merely a fabrication orchestrated without the knowledge or approval of the ward executive committee,” Kyari said.

According to him, the ward chairman, Alhaji Bala Galda, disclosed that the alleged resignation letter was received on May 23, 2026, despite being dated May 19, and was delivered by one Abba Pantami.

“Despite repeated requests, members of the ward executive committee have not been provided with a copy of the said letter,” Kyari stated.

See also  Communities stranded after terrorists destroy police stations

He argued that under the provisions of the APC Constitution, the Independent National Electoral Commission guidelines and the Electoral Act, Pantami remained an APC member until the prescribed procedures were completed and verified.

“It is, therefore, our position that Professor Ali Isa Pantami remains a member of the APC until all due processes are properly followed and verified,” he said.

Kyari also dismissed claims allegedly made by Pantami during a televised interview on TVC that his defection to the PDP and governorship ambition had the blessing of President Bola Tinubu.

“We categorically reject this assertion. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a committed leader of the APC and has consistently demonstrated loyalty to the party. It is difficult to believe that the President would endorse activities that are contrary to the interests and unity of the APC,” he said.

He called on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify the issue to prevent misinformation.

“We, therefore, call on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify and dispel these claims in order to prevent misinformation and avoid misleading the people,” Kyari added.

However, in a swift response contained in a statement signed by its state Public Relations Officer, Abdulkadir Dukku, the PDP dismissed the APC’s position, insisting that Pantami had fulfilled all constitutional and legal requirements for membership of the opposition party.

“We wish to categorically state that Professor Pantami is a bona fide member of the Peoples Democratic Party, having duly complied with all the constitutional and legal requirements for membership of our party,” the PDP said.

See also  New tax regime: What’s true, what’s not

The party further stated that it possessed documentary evidence confirming Pantami’s resignation from the APC.

“The PDP possesses all relevant documents confirming his resignation from his former party, acknowledged by his then ward chairman,” the statement read.

According to the PDP, the APC chairman in Pantami Ward personally acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter on May 19, 2026.

“The chairman of APC in Pantami Ward acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter in person on May 19, 2026, and subsequently posted it on social media, where it went viral,” the party added.

The opposition party described the APC’s repeated press briefings on the matter as unnecessary.

“It should be noted that this is the third time the APC has organised a press conference on the same issue, despite the facts being clear and well documented,” the statement said.

The PDP urged the ruling party to focus on preparations for the forthcoming elections rather than what it described as distractions.

“Consequently, we urge the APC in Gombe State to focus on preparing for the forthcoming general election instead of engaging in unnecessary distractions,” it stated.

The party also argued that the Constitution and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association.

“If the APC lacks confidence in its candidate, it should address its internal concerns instead of insisting that Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami must remain in the party.

“After all, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association,” the PDP said.

It added that the APC still had the opportunity, within the electoral process, to make decisions regarding its candidature if it believed its candidate could not effectively compete against Pantami.

See also  2027: North Will Prefer Jonathan To Obi – PDP Chieftain

Reaffirming its stance ahead of the elections, the PDP said it remained committed to issue-based campaigns and providing credible leadership to the people of Gombe State.

“The PDP remains committed to issue-based campaigns and to providing the people of Gombe State with credible leadership, development and good governance,” the statement concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

Published

on

Following the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress and four other parties on Monday, ADC National Chairman Senator David Mark stated the judiciary is on trial and warned the Federal Government against political manipulation.

Stakeholders also called for sanctions against Justice Peter Lifu for flouting a superior court order, as the ADC assures supporters they will remain on the ballot.

Political parties and stakeholders affected by the Federal High Court’s controversial deregistration order welcomed the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the judgment.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja had on Tuesday ordered a stay of execution of the judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party, while delivering a stinging rebuke to Justice Lifu for flouting a May 22 appellate court order restraining him from delivering the ruling.

In a unanimous decision on Tuesday, a three-member panel led by Justice A. B. Mohammed condemned Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja for flouting a May 22 order that directed him to suspend proceedings before him, describing his conduct as the gravest form of judicial misconduct.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution,” the panel held.

The appellate court went further, invoking a Supreme Court precedent to characterise Justice Lifu’s conduct in the harshest terms.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is the highest form of judicial impertinence,” the panel declared, adding that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acted in such a manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

The court said it had a duty to assert its supervisory authority over lower courts and protect the integrity of the judicial hierarchy.

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This court has supervisory authority over the trial court. This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are obeyed. The application for stay of execution is hereby granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the panel ruled.

The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Lifu, had on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party, ruling that the five parties failed to meet the constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution, specifically, requirements related to securing at least 25 per cent of votes in certain states or winning seats in the 2023 general elections.

Earlier in Tuesday’s proceedings, INEC told the appellate court it was stunned by Justice Lifu’s decision to deliver the judgment, disclosing that the commission only learned of the ruling through media reports rather than any official notification.

INEC’s lead counsel, Mr Haliru Mohammed, told the panel that the commission had been aware of the appellate court’s May 22 order restraining the lower court from delivering the judgment, which had originally been reserved for June 5.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media. We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment,” Mohammed submitted.

The commission also aligned itself with the notice of appeal filed by the affected political parties.

Counsel to the ADC, Mr Shuaibu Aruwa, SAN, told the court that Justice Lifu communicated the judgment’s delivery to the party via WhatsApp, a disclosure that drew visible reactions from the bench.

See also  2027: North Will Prefer Jonathan To Obi – PDP Chieftain

Aruwa described the lower court’s conduct as an invitation to anarchy and urged the appellate court to invoke its disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution to sanction the judge.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay,” he added.

APC reacts

Reacting to the appellate court’s decision,  the ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the ruling offered a measure of hope for the judiciary’s credibility, though he was careful not to celebrate unreservedly.

“It indicates that the judiciary may still redeem itself. We are cautiously delighted but we insist that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place,” Abdullahi said in a telephone interview.

He called on the National Judicial Council to take urgent steps to rid the bench of judges whose conduct brought the institution into disrepute.

“We, therefore, hope that the judicial council will take urgent steps to purge the bench of judges who bring the judicial institution to disrepute,” he said.

The National Leader of the Action Peoples Party, Ikenga Ugochinyere, was more emphatic in his welcome of the ruling, describing it as a vindication of the party’s position from the outset and calling on the NJC to weed out what he termed controversial judges.

“There was no need to panic in the first place, and, so, this ruling is a vindication of our position from the get-go,” Ugochinyere said.

“We call on the NJC to weed out controversial justices who say one thing in the morning and another in the evening. These are the bad eggs giving the judiciary a bad name,” he added.

Ugochinyere raised broader concerns about public confidence in the justice system, warning that judicial inconsistency was eroding citizens’ respect for court pronouncements.

“Court pronouncements are supposed to be respected by citizens, particularly because they come from institutions established by law. But when people begin to hide behind technicalities, it raises concerns about the integrity of those institutions.

“How do we expect citizens to obey court judgments when many people no longer see justice as blind, but rather as something influenced by individuals and personal interests? That is the challenge before us,” the APP leader added.

He also noted that the controversy surrounding Justice Lifu’s ruling had sparked frustration across the country, with some of the anger directed at the presidency.

“This situation has generated a lot of reactions across the country. Many people are directing their frustrations at the President. Perhaps there is a need for greater clarity so that Nigerians understand exactly what is happening,” Ugochinyere said.

He nevertheless described Tuesday’s outcome as a victory for democracy and the rule of law.

“What happened today (Tuesday) is a victory, not just for democracy, but for the rule of law. We are happy because the courts have once again demonstrated their relevance in our democratic process,” he said.

Other parties speak

The Acting National Chairman of the Coalition of United Political Parties,  Peter Ameh, took a philosophical approach in welcoming the ruling, invoking the words of the philosopher Edmund Burke to frame the significance of the appellate court’s intervention.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” Ameh said.

He warned that what he described as hostile executive rascality and brazen judicial overreach must not be allowed to stand.

See also  Court adjourns ruling in ADC deregistration suit to March 24

Also, the ADC presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar said in a statement posted on his X handle that the ruling was a positive development, noting with particular significance that INEC itself had initiated the application for the stay .

“I welcome the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the Federal High Court judgment seeking the deregistration of our great party, the ADC, and four other political parties. It is particularly significant that INEC itself initiated the application for the stay,” he wrote.

Atiku, Mark protest

The former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar also criticised what he described as judicial contradictions in the ongoing legal dispute, warning that such developments had placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny.

“The disturbing spectacle of judicial contradictions and politically charged rulings playing out in our courts has placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny. As ADC National Chairman, Sen. David Mark, rightly observed, the judiciary itself is now on trial,” Atiku said.

He warned against any attempt to weaponise the courts against Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

“Any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s hard-won democracy through judicial manipulation is a grave danger to the Republic. If our democracy suffers further injury, history will demand accountability from those entrusted with dispensing justice,” he said.

Following the judgment given by Justice Lifu, the National Judicial Council has been urged to investigate Justice Peter Lifu over his decision to deliver judgment in a case that was already before the Court of Appeal.

The civil society organisation, Tap Initiative for FOR Citizens’ Development, on Tuesday in a statement called on the leadership of the judiciary to immediately investigate Justice Lifu over the judgment.

The call follows concerns over the alleged disregard for the hierarchy of courts and implications such actions could have on the judiciary and Nigeria’s democracy as the country moves closer to the 2027 general elections.

Justice Lifu had on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties over their alleged breach of Section 225(A) of the Constitution.

However, the judgment was reportedly delivered despite an order staying proceedings issued by the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal on May 22.

The decision has since attracted criticism from several quarters, with critics accusing the judge of undermining democratic principles.

In a statement signed by its Executive Director, Mbasekei Martin Obono, the group urged the NJC to, among other things, “Determine whether the decision was delivered in disregard of pending appellate proceedings and a subsisting order of stay;

“Examine possible breaches of the judicial code of conduct; Take appropriate disciplinary action if misconduct is established; and

Reaffirm the authority of appellate courts and the supremacy of due process within the judiciary”.

The group recalled that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, had consistently emphasised the need for accountability, discipline and ethical conduct within the judiciary.

It disclosed that it had formally petitioned the CJN, in her capacity as Chairman of the NJC, seeking an investigation and possible disciplinary action against Justice Lifu.

According to the group, the petition presents an opportunity to reinforce the principles of accountability and demonstrate that judicial independence is not incompatible with responsibility.

“Tap Initiative expresses grave concern that at the time the said judgement was delivered, there were subsisting appellate proceedings before the Court of Appeal in respect of the same subject matter in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026. Furthermore, the Court of Appeal had issued an Enrolment Order expressly granting a stay of proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2025, being the very proceedings in which the Federal High Court subsequently proceeded to deliver judgment.

“This development raises profound constitutional and procedural concerns, as it appears that a valid order of stay and active appellate proceedings were in force at the material time. If established, this situation would constitute a serious affront to the doctrine of judicial hierarchy and the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal within Nigeria’s constitutional order.

See also  Olawepo-Hashim urges Tinubu, INEC to shift primaries to September

“Tap Initiative emphasizes that the integrity of Nigeria’s justice system depends fundamentally on strict adherence to judicial hierarchy, procedural discipline, and respect for appellate authority. Any deviation from these principles risks creating conflicting judicial outcomes, eroding legal certainty, and undermining public confidence in the courts”, he said.

The group stressed that the judiciary remains the last hope of the common citizen, arguing that its legitimacy is sustained not only by constitutional authority but also by unwavering public confidence in its fairness, discipline and respect for the rule of law.

It therefore called on the NJC to treat the matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves in the interest of justice, democracy and national stability.

Meanwhile, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Senator David Mark, on Tuesday declared that the Nigerian judiciary, rather than the opposition party, is the institution facing scrutiny over the controversy surrounding the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties.

Speaking at the ADC Strategic Communications Retreat in Abuja, the former Senate President accused the judiciary of actions capable of undermining public confidence in the nation’s democratic process, while questioning the conduct of Justice Peter Lifu in matters relating to the party.

According to Mark, the outcome of the controversy will test the credibility of the judiciary and the ability of the National Judicial Council to address concerns arising from the case.

“The ADC is not on trial. Rather, it is the judiciary that is on trial and the nation is waiting to see how the National Judicial Council is going to handle this precarious situation,” he said.

The ADC chairman expressed concern over what he described as unprecedented judicial actions, alleging that Justice Lifu ignored an order of the Court of Appeal directing a stay of proceedings in the matter.

He said it was difficult to comprehend how a judge could be involved in actions that appeared to contradict existing court directives.

Mark further alleged that the judge issued conflicting decisions regarding the status of the party within a short period.

“It is strange that a judge can order the Independent National Electoral Commission to pronounce a party dead and in less than 24 hours put the same party on trial,” he said.

The remarks come amid growing political tension over recent legal challenges affecting opposition parties ahead of preparations for the next electoral cycle.

Despite the legal setback, Mark urged party members not to lose confidence in the ADC, insisting that the party would emerge stronger from the dispute.

“Like I have said previously, our members should not worry about the shenanigans of the ruling party. We will go through all these turbulence because we are up to the task. By the time we are through all these, ADC will come out stronger,” he stated.

The former Senate President also accused the ruling All Progressives Congress APC of attempting to weaken opposition forces through distractions, claiming that the governing party was struggling to defend its record in office.

He alleged that the President Bola Tinubu-led government is diverting attention from its challenges by targeting opposition platforms.

Addressing party communicators at the retreat, Mark charged them to craft messages capable of expanding the ADC’s appeal across political divides, including among members of the ruling party.

He challenged the communications team to develop persuasive narratives that would attract more Nigerians to the ADC project.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Obidient movement condemns court order to scrap ADC, four parties

Published

on

The Obidient Movement has condemned a Federal High Court order directing the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties, describing the ruling as a threat to political inclusion and democratic participation in Nigeria.

The order, delivered on Monday by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, directed INEC to delist the African Democratic Congress, Accord Party, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance and Zenith Labour Party over alleged failure to meet constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022.

The suit was filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators, which asked the court to determine whether INEC is constitutionally bound to deregister parties that fail to meet electoral benchmarks, including winning at least 25 per cent of votes in any state in a presidential election or securing at least one elective office.

Reacting in a statement issued on Tuesday and signed by its National Coordinator, Dr Yunusa Tanko, the Obidient Movement said it was concerned about the implications of the ruling for Nigeria’s democratic space.

The group described itself as “an organic movement driven by the self-sacrifice, commitment, and collective determination of Nigerians who believe that a New Nigeria is Possible,” adding that it is aligned with the political philosophy of Nigeria Democratic Congress presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

It warned that reducing the number of political platforms available to citizens would undermine democratic choice and participation.

According to the statement, “We align strongly with the ideas and principles of His Excellency, Mr. Peter Obi, who has consistently demonstrated a different approach to politics by challenging the dominance of a money-driven political system.”

See also  Read how Adelabu resigned against Tinubu’s wish

The movement stressed that democracy must remain open and competitive, arguing that inclusiveness is central to its survival.

It stated: “As believers in democratic values, we are concerned about the deregistration of political parties such as ADC, AA, ZLP and APP.

“A vibrant democracy thrives on inclusiveness, political participation, and the availability of diverse platforms through which citizens can freely express their aspirations and choices.”

The group further said Nigeria’s democratic future must be built on fairness, credible institutions, and stronger citizen participation, rather than restrictions on political actors.

It also reaffirmed its commitment to civic engagement, accountability, and voter mobilisation ahead of future elections, urging Nigerians not to disengage from the political process.

“The future of Nigeria’s democracy must be built on fairness, inclusion, credible institutions, and the active participation of citizens,” the statement added.

The movement encouraged citizens to obtain their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs), describing voting as a key instrument of democratic power.

“Your PVC is more than a card; it is your voice, your power, and your responsibility. Every election is an opportunity to shape the future we desire,” it concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending