Connect with us

Politics

Nigerians, not INEC, will determine ADC’s fate — Party’s founding chairman, Ralph Nwosu

Published

on

In this interview with WALE AKINSELURE, the founder and pioneer National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Ralph Nwosu, explains the origin of the David Mark-led coalition, addresses factional and legal disputes, and the party’s strategy ahead of the 2027 general election

A lot is going on with the African Democratic Congress, among which is litigation, factionalisation spearheaded by the likes of Nafiu Gombe and Dumebi Kachikwu, which gives us the genesis of the David Mark-led ADC coalition that is being disputed.

This coalition happened immediately after the court judgment on the last election. I was moving around seeking a coalition. I had meetings with former President Olusegun Obasanjo many times. He invited some leaders. I had a meeting with Rauf Aregbesola in his home in Lagos and Osun. After that, Emeka Nwajuiba approached me and said that he was talking for a larger group, that all the groups that had been wanting to get in, including the PDP group, the Congress for Progressive Change group, the All Progressives Congress group, and I said that it was good. So, I started working with that group. I insisted that we will form this coalition once all of the critical opposition figures have signed in. This is because ADC, working with one single party alone, cannot do it. After I had the first conversations, we set up a committee that included Dr Mani Ahmad from Niger State, Dr Bamidele Ajadi from Oyo State, and Godson Okoye from Anambra State. They were the ones that we put forward to handle the negotiations. When it becomes a bit difficult, I will get involved. Later, we added more people. We added Jumoke Olawoyin, Bala Nafiu, and a couple of others. We continued that conversation. This recent coalition started more than two years ago. And when we started to agree, there was a need for us to have a National Executive Council meeting so that all our members and leaders would be informed. Our NEC is all the state chairmen plus the Federal Capital Territory, that is 37 chairmen. Then it also includes all our zonal executives. Each zone has between nine and 13 members, multiplied by six, that is over 70 members. Then the National Working Committee had about 30 members. So, we have a total of over 130 members. We held our first NEC meeting at NICON Luxury. The committee reported to them that some people are approaching us to form a coalition, merger or alliance and asked all the NEC members if they approve for us to continue that journey. They all approved. It was 100 per cent approval. The records are there. The media was there. The Independent National Electoral Commission was there at our NEC. So, when we agreed that we are ready to work with other political parties, other individuals to form a mega coalition, we sent them our Constitution. They saw our constitution, and they saw some limitations, that is, things in our constitution that would limit them from fully participating. And they raised it. For instance, you have to be a member for two years before you can contest an election, or even want to be an executive of the party, unless you get a waiver. When they pointed that out to us, we met and told them that, under our Constitution, the NEC can do the work you can do during the convention. The NEC can act for the convention. Therefore, we need to call another NEC meeting and make the needed amendments to make the coalition work well and be constitutional. So, NEC was called. Over 130 people were there, and the documentation was done. INEC was also present. Members of these different groups will also send a few people as observers to make sure everything is going well. They all went well. There was one clause that, if the national chairman resigns or is voted out, the person to act should be the deputy national chairman in charge of politics and must come from the same zone as the national chairman. We had to make all these amendments to make it possible for anybody from anywhere to contest the election. We did it in the presence of INEC. INEC helped us. Prelude to all of this, we were having some issues before, caused by Dumebi Kachikwu.

Are you referring to the same Dumebi Kachikwu who was your presidential candidate?

Yes, the small party we were then, anybody can come and say they want to run for President. We were looking for people to come and run. A lot of people will go to the PDP and APC to run, and parties were struggling to get a candidate who could run. As a matter of fact, it was when Dumebi came to undermine and deal with our party that we put those clauses that nobody can come after two or three months, and we give the person the ticket to run because you don’t know their motives. So, when we redid our constitution, we included all that, because of the troublesomeness of Dumebi. Dumebi came to our party to cause problems.

If he was causing problems, what firm measures did you implement to deal with the situation?

During our convention, he was expelled. And our party was free to adopt the Labour Party presidential candidate during the election proper. He was expelled. Those who know Dumebi Kachikwu will know he is just looking to play a destructive game.

But he still claims to be a member…

See also  2026: I’m cruising to victory, Adeleke boasts

Presently, he’s not our member. But, for some reason, the fact that he was a presidential candidate makes him feel that it doesn’t expire. You always see him on television claiming to be the presidential candidate of ADC. But you took our ticket and tried to damage the party. If you were a presidential candidate, it has expired now; you didn’t use it well. Now, the gains of ADC have created business for the people instead of thinking of nation-building. So, people like Kachikwu, and unfortunately, Bala Nafiu, have become victims. All that is happening is just the party in power and the media that is giving it this colouration.

Was Bala part of the various meetings you mentioned?

One hundred per cent, yes. There was no meeting he missed. The records are there. INEC records are there. When Bala went to court claiming something, one of the documents that was presented in the court was the one that INEC wrote. INEC presented a case against Bala that it was there and that Bala participated in everything. INEC had their record. But recently, we heard that INEC had gone back on what they presented when Bala started this troublesome thing.

So, what is happening now?

What is happening is that people are being induced to appear as if there is a crisis in ADC. How can one individual be a faction in a group that is now five million persons? We have had people who have run as presidential candidates even in the major parties before, and the moment that election year finishes, and you didn’t win, that is over. But as far as Dumebi is concerned, he is using anything that would make it look as if he influences ADC, as the government in place has so much money to throw away. This is money they have come to regard as an anti-opposition budget. A few people are looking that way. But that few, even if they are 20 or 30 or whatever number, is not a fraction in an organisation that is over five million registered members who are paying their dues.

There are those of the opinion that while you were reaching terms of agreement with Senator David Mark and his group, you sidelined Bala, Dumebi and others in some sharing formula…

Sharing what? I have never been a transactional leader. As far as ADC is concerned, as far as this coalition is concerned, nobody did any transaction. We are part of the party, and if by God’s grace, we win the election, we’ll be part of the government. From what we were before, that’s a big plus. We gave Pat Utomi the party to run for president. Ask him if there was any transaction. Instead, most leaders of the party were contributing to his election. When the former president Obasanjo came, ask him if Chief Nwosu or any executive of the party had come to him to collect a dime. None. We’re not into transactions. We are deeply vested in nation-building. But some people can be easily swayed, and they think that everything in politics is about transaction; it’s about money, and so on. And if we don’t change that, it will continue to hurt this country. That is why I said that the ADC is hope built on integrity, and nobody can take that away.

You have a lot of legal battles that you face, and you hope to participate in the 2027 elections. How do you hope to circumvent these battles?

Those legal battles started because of the coalition that we built. And how many? Even though all this legal battle is getting public attention, it is not up to one per cent of the legal battles within the APC itself. It’s not up to one per cent of the legal battle within PDP. It’s not up to one per cent of the legal battle within the All Progressives Grand Alliance. It’s not up to 50 per cent of the legal battle within all the other political parties that are in existence today. It’s just being hyped by people who want to create the impression that there’s too much trouble in ADC. Don’t go there. That’s the game. But the leadership of the party in place has also helped us navigate very well. It would be good as media professionals that you tell political parties and leaders, that it’s election time, go and focus on campaigning and convincing Nigerian people and not investing money to destroy the party, corrupting all the systems that we have. INEC was challenging Bala on their own because they have the records. Then, since Prof Joash Amupitan came, that challenge was withdrawn. INEC actually organised the Alternative Dispute Resolution. This is the ADR that brought together all the old chairmen more than two years back. And all those we brought back, we gave their position. And all these records were put together. INEC has them. And INEC got one of the best ADR firms to handle it at their own cost. And we were benevolent to bring everybody back. Now that it’s time for congresses, some of those chairmen who were giving problems that we brought back and whose tenure is over are now trying to blackmail the party so that all of them are returned. We said, go and face the election. They don’t want to do that. Instead, they’ve gone back to people who have the budget to stop all the coalition processes. When Nigerians are suffering, when we have a security situation, the APC has some billions of Naira to fund people who want to disrupt other political parties.

See also  Damilola Marshal, KWAM1’s daughter declares ambition for Lagos Assembly

Does that include Leke Abejide, who is also in protest against the David Mark leadership?

Part of the thing pushing Leke Abejide is that, since he got elected in ADC, he became an APC supporter because APC got him and gave him the chairman of the House Committee on Customs. He’s in a minority party, and they gave him the position of chairman of customs, so he’s in alignment with the APC. In 2023, Leke Abejide made it clear that ADC is for President Bola Tinubu and their government because he’s the chairman of customs in the House of Representatives.

You went ahead with your Convention despite derecognition by the INEC. Some ex-staff of INEC and analysts fear that there might be consequences, including that INEC may not recognise that Convention.

It would be wrong if we did everything we needed to do, if all our processes are good, and then the umpire is out to de-market us. The umpire put out the time for the congresses to happen. The umpire set out the time for parties to choose candidates for the upcoming election. And when it is about one month to do your congresses and present your candidates, the umpire came out to interpret a ruling any way they like and continue to de-market ADC? We are a peace-loving party, and we are genuine in what we are doing. It’s a democracy, and we are doing everything we are doing transparently before the Nigerian public. All the agencies in this country, as far as democracy is concerned, whether you are the president, whether you are anything, report to the Nigerian people. We want the Nigerian people to take ownership. Nigerian people must take ownership of INEC. If the Chairman of INEC has become a tool, we’re now reporting to the Nigerian people. We can’t allow his whims and caprices to derail us. We won’t allow that. The media, international organisations, international agencies, and embassies witnessed our convention.

What if INEC declares that all your electoral processes from top to bottom are not recognised?

INEC is supposed to oversee the electoral process, but the moment they start to fail, you hand it over to the Nigerian people, who own the country and own all the agencies and so on. We must stop Amupitan. If you love democracy, you’ll be very upset with Bola Tinubu. You mean we fought for democracy for him to become president and foist an undemocratic system like never before on the country? Is that why the military was chased away? For him to have the opportunity to become President, he has fallen short of expectations for his constituency and everybody. People like Obafemi Awolowo and MKO Abiola will be turning in their graves. Is this a democracy?

The ADC, PDP, and LP’s challenges are quite pronounced. Do you also share the fear that the 2027 presidential election might be a walkover for Tinubu?

That is what Bola Tinubu is planning, but it would not work.

Why won’t it work?

The Nigerian people will take over.

The same Nigerian people who are sometimes regarded as docile?

We have become accountable to the Nigerian people. My phone is always on silent mode because I receive over a thousand calls in a day. The ADC website, despite being upgraded to the Amazon portal, is still challenged because of the interest of the Nigerian people. Nigerians are alert. We will not allow a few, desperate, disingenuous individuals to run down the democracy in our country. Enough is enough.

When shall the ADC get to the point of zoning the presidency? Recently, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, during an interview on Arise Television, made a case for the North producing the president in 2027.

In ADC, it is open. When this coalition was happening, I had some young Northern people come to my office who argued against the South continuing. They said, ADC, you have to be fair. They argued that this republic started in 1999, and from then till the end of the current Bola Tinubu’s tenure, that the South would have done 18 years and the North 10 years. And that we are still saying that it is the turn of the South? I never thought in that light, but that is the reality. If the North is saying, leave it open. If the South gets it, they will be ready to work with them.

When you mean leaving it open, are you talking about direct primaries?

We are plotting two options. We are looking at a consensus if everybody agrees. But where there is disagreement, we do direct primaries. Whoever wins becomes the standard-bearer of the party. I have heard some of the candidates say that if they don’t win, they are in the party and would support whoever wins. Rotimi Amaechi, Atiku Abubakar, and Peter Obi have said that. We await Rabiu Kwankwaso to also say that publicly. But the day the document was signed, that was what we put forward. We were very clear on open ticket and transparency. That was part of the reason everybody agreed that one of the persons who can do transparent primaries, because of his transparent character, is the chairmanship of David Mark.

There is the view that your party could fall in place or fall apart with the choice of its presidential candidate. How crucial is it that you get this right?

See also  The biggest beneficiaries of the Fourth Republic are the South West - APC chieftain, Adamu Garba

By October, you will realise that with the party that we are building, anyone who gets the ticket will win the election. The frontrunners now are Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, Rotimi Amaechi, Emeka Nwajuiba, Rauf Aregbesola, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Aminu Tambuwal, and Babachir Lawal. Any of these is what we are looking at. One of them will become a candidate, but it is also possible that none of them will be because the party we are building will deliver anybody we put forward. So far, it’s going well with the party. The Nigerian people are in love with what we are doing. The only people trying to pour sand in our garri are the APC, which is unfortunate. It’s democracy. Go and campaign, and if God has helped you and you get into office, your campaign would have been the outcome of your good governance. The judiciary should tell politicians that it is not for the courts to give them victory; they should go and meet the Nigerian people.

In terms of zones, where do you think the strength of ADC lies?

From the membership registration of over five million that we have presently, the North-West has registered the most, followed by the North-East, then South-South and South-West, then North-Central. For some reason, the South-East has not done so well, but they are coming up.

But a five-million-member membership would not win the presidential election.

These are active men and women who are involved in the party. It is not up to five per cent of eligible Nigerians who want to be involved in parties as members. I am an ADC member; my children and wife are busy with their own professions. As a matter of fact, they don’t want anything to do with politics. And that is the same way in most homes. Most bankers are not members of any political party; most professionals are busy. But they are conscious, and they would vote. We are targeting 37.5million votes to win the election. ADC will win the election.

But you also have factions at the state level.

At the state level, ADC is one of the strongest organisations that we have. When David Mark took office, we only had about seven party offices at the state level that were working. But now we have 36 strong party offices as strong as any party in Nigeria. We have 774 local government offices, and we have 8,900 ward offices spread across Nigeria. We have set up different committees. Our intelligence committee is working very hard. Our contact and mobilisation committee is working. Our integrity committee is working. Recently, two major organisations came out of ADC. There is the one ADC movement chaired by Lauretta Onochie, and the idea is to make sure that all groups coalesce into one ADC. Then the other major group is the Coalition for Electoral Integrity, and within the next few months, it will ensure that Nigerians are properly educated about what their vote means. They would preach that even if somebody offers them N100,000 – which we heard is the budget they are setting for buying votes – it is not worth it. The coalition is taking off, and Nigerians will be educated more on how they should vote than they have ever been educated in our democracy before.

Funding continues to be crucial for parties to prosecute elections. You alluded that it was once the bane of the ADC. How do you intend to change that narrative with the 2027 election?

When we formed the party, I was clear with my colleagues that we were going to take this party, with our vision and DNA, into the Villa. Due to funding, it has taken us this long. But now, with the calibre of persons, stature of individuals who have joined the party, and with what Nigerians have seen, we won’t have any issue regarding funding. You see a lot of Nigerians working on their own, promoting ADC. We have had old, retired men and women asking us to send our account for them to send money, saying they love what we are doing. They are both military and civilians. We have had retired men of the Armed Forces who have seen their men killed, contractors who the government is not paying, who send their stipends seeking our help to rescue them. We will have more than enough money to prosecute the election. And a lot of people are not asking us for money.

What are we looking at in terms of the amount for your party forms for the various elective positions?

It will be out within the next fortnight.

You gave up your national chairmanship of the party. In what role do you now play in the party?

I am a floor member, and I like that. At times, it is good to lead from the floor. Nigerians need to be inspired to see that this bloated head about the leader, the president, is nothing. I am a floor member as well as a major stakeholder in the party. I have declined all the committees they put me on. I am only the chairman of the Integrity Committee.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

APC, PDP trade words over Pantami’s political membership status

Published

on

A fresh controversy has erupted in Gombe State over the political status of former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Ali Pantami, as the All Progressives Congress and the Peoples Democratic Party laid conflicting claims to his party membership.

The dispute followed Pantami’s emergence as the PDP governorship candidate ahead of the 2027 general elections, after the APC primary election produced Jamilu Gwamna as its candidate.

The Gombe State chapter of the PDP insisted that Pantami had validly resigned from the APC and is now a bona fide member of the opposition party.

The APC, however, maintained that the former minister remains its member because due process was allegedly not followed in effecting his resignation.

Addressing journalists in Gombe on Tuesday, the APC Publicity Secretary, Moses Kyari, said the party’s executive committee in Pantami Ward had earlier clarified that it neither received nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Pantami.

“As you may recall, 25 out of the 27 members of the ward executive committee publicly stated that they neither saw nor deliberated on any resignation letter purportedly submitted by Professor Ali Isa Pantami.

“They maintained that the claim was merely a fabrication orchestrated without the knowledge or approval of the ward executive committee,” Kyari said.

According to him, the ward chairman, Alhaji Bala Galda, disclosed that the alleged resignation letter was received on May 23, 2026, despite being dated May 19, and was delivered by one Abba Pantami.

“Despite repeated requests, members of the ward executive committee have not been provided with a copy of the said letter,” Kyari stated.

See also  By-election: Seek redress in court, Ogun IPAC urges aggrieved parties

He argued that under the provisions of the APC Constitution, the Independent National Electoral Commission guidelines and the Electoral Act, Pantami remained an APC member until the prescribed procedures were completed and verified.

“It is, therefore, our position that Professor Ali Isa Pantami remains a member of the APC until all due processes are properly followed and verified,” he said.

Kyari also dismissed claims allegedly made by Pantami during a televised interview on TVC that his defection to the PDP and governorship ambition had the blessing of President Bola Tinubu.

“We categorically reject this assertion. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a committed leader of the APC and has consistently demonstrated loyalty to the party. It is difficult to believe that the President would endorse activities that are contrary to the interests and unity of the APC,” he said.

He called on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify the issue to prevent misinformation.

“We, therefore, call on the national leadership of the APC and the Presidency to publicly clarify and dispel these claims in order to prevent misinformation and avoid misleading the people,” Kyari added.

However, in a swift response contained in a statement signed by its state Public Relations Officer, Abdulkadir Dukku, the PDP dismissed the APC’s position, insisting that Pantami had fulfilled all constitutional and legal requirements for membership of the opposition party.

“We wish to categorically state that Professor Pantami is a bona fide member of the Peoples Democratic Party, having duly complied with all the constitutional and legal requirements for membership of our party,” the PDP said.

See also  The biggest beneficiaries of the Fourth Republic are the South West - APC chieftain, Adamu Garba

The party further stated that it possessed documentary evidence confirming Pantami’s resignation from the APC.

“The PDP possesses all relevant documents confirming his resignation from his former party, acknowledged by his then ward chairman,” the statement read.

According to the PDP, the APC chairman in Pantami Ward personally acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter on May 19, 2026.

“The chairman of APC in Pantami Ward acknowledged Pantami’s resignation letter in person on May 19, 2026, and subsequently posted it on social media, where it went viral,” the party added.

The opposition party described the APC’s repeated press briefings on the matter as unnecessary.

“It should be noted that this is the third time the APC has organised a press conference on the same issue, despite the facts being clear and well documented,” the statement said.

The PDP urged the ruling party to focus on preparations for the forthcoming elections rather than what it described as distractions.

“Consequently, we urge the APC in Gombe State to focus on preparing for the forthcoming general election instead of engaging in unnecessary distractions,” it stated.

The party also argued that the Constitution and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association.

“If the APC lacks confidence in its candidate, it should address its internal concerns instead of insisting that Professor Isa Ali Ibrahim Pantami must remain in the party.

“After all, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Electoral Act guarantee freedom of association,” the PDP said.

It added that the APC still had the opportunity, within the electoral process, to make decisions regarding its candidature if it believed its candidate could not effectively compete against Pantami.

See also  Poor communication making APC achievements invisible, says party chair

Reaffirming its stance ahead of the elections, the PDP said it remained committed to issue-based campaigns and providing credible leadership to the people of Gombe State.

“The PDP remains committed to issue-based campaigns and to providing the people of Gombe State with credible leadership, development and good governance,” the statement concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

David Mark slams FG after A’Court reverses ADC deregistration

Published

on

Following the Court of Appeal’s decision to reverse the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress and four other parties on Monday, ADC National Chairman Senator David Mark stated the judiciary is on trial and warned the Federal Government against political manipulation.

Stakeholders also called for sanctions against Justice Peter Lifu for flouting a superior court order, as the ADC assures supporters they will remain on the ballot.

Political parties and stakeholders affected by the Federal High Court’s controversial deregistration order welcomed the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the judgment.

The Court of Appeal in Abuja had on Tuesday ordered a stay of execution of the judgment that directed the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party, while delivering a stinging rebuke to Justice Lifu for flouting a May 22 appellate court order restraining him from delivering the ruling.

In a unanimous decision on Tuesday, a three-member panel led by Justice A. B. Mohammed condemned Justice Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja for flouting a May 22 order that directed him to suspend proceedings before him, describing his conduct as the gravest form of judicial misconduct.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is a brazen violation of the hierarchy of the court and the 1999 Constitution,” the panel held.

The appellate court went further, invoking a Supreme Court precedent to characterise Justice Lifu’s conduct in the harshest terms.

“The decision of the lower court to proceed with the judgment despite the express order of this court is the highest form of judicial impertinence,” the panel declared, adding that the Supreme Court had previously held that a judge who acted in such a manner “is unfit for the bench as it amounts to judicial rascality.”

The court said it had a duty to assert its supervisory authority over lower courts and protect the integrity of the judicial hierarchy.

“Courts are enjoined to protect their integrity. This court has supervisory authority over the trial court. This court has the duty to invoke its powers in ensuring that its orders are obeyed. The application for stay of execution is hereby granted. The enforcement of the judgment is stayed,” the panel ruled.

The Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Lifu, had on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Accord Party, Action Alliance, Action Peoples Party and Zenith Labour Party, ruling that the five parties failed to meet the constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution, specifically, requirements related to securing at least 25 per cent of votes in certain states or winning seats in the 2023 general elections.

Earlier in Tuesday’s proceedings, INEC told the appellate court it was stunned by Justice Lifu’s decision to deliver the judgment, disclosing that the commission only learned of the ruling through media reports rather than any official notification.

INEC’s lead counsel, Mr Haliru Mohammed, told the panel that the commission had been aware of the appellate court’s May 22 order restraining the lower court from delivering the judgment, which had originally been reserved for June 5.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media. We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment,” Mohammed submitted.

The commission also aligned itself with the notice of appeal filed by the affected political parties.

Counsel to the ADC, Mr Shuaibu Aruwa, SAN, told the court that Justice Lifu communicated the judgment’s delivery to the party via WhatsApp, a disclosure that drew visible reactions from the bench.

See also  PDP Moves To Woo Jonathan For 2027 Presidential Race, Express Worry Over Peter Obi’s Purported Return

Aruwa described the lower court’s conduct as an invitation to anarchy and urged the appellate court to invoke its disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution to sanction the judge.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay,” he added.

APC reacts

Reacting to the appellate court’s decision,  the ADC’s National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said the ruling offered a measure of hope for the judiciary’s credibility, though he was careful not to celebrate unreservedly.

“It indicates that the judiciary may still redeem itself. We are cautiously delighted but we insist that it shouldn’t have happened in the first place,” Abdullahi said in a telephone interview.

He called on the National Judicial Council to take urgent steps to rid the bench of judges whose conduct brought the institution into disrepute.

“We, therefore, hope that the judicial council will take urgent steps to purge the bench of judges who bring the judicial institution to disrepute,” he said.

The National Leader of the Action Peoples Party, Ikenga Ugochinyere, was more emphatic in his welcome of the ruling, describing it as a vindication of the party’s position from the outset and calling on the NJC to weed out what he termed controversial judges.

“There was no need to panic in the first place, and, so, this ruling is a vindication of our position from the get-go,” Ugochinyere said.

“We call on the NJC to weed out controversial justices who say one thing in the morning and another in the evening. These are the bad eggs giving the judiciary a bad name,” he added.

Ugochinyere raised broader concerns about public confidence in the justice system, warning that judicial inconsistency was eroding citizens’ respect for court pronouncements.

“Court pronouncements are supposed to be respected by citizens, particularly because they come from institutions established by law. But when people begin to hide behind technicalities, it raises concerns about the integrity of those institutions.

“How do we expect citizens to obey court judgments when many people no longer see justice as blind, but rather as something influenced by individuals and personal interests? That is the challenge before us,” the APP leader added.

He also noted that the controversy surrounding Justice Lifu’s ruling had sparked frustration across the country, with some of the anger directed at the presidency.

“This situation has generated a lot of reactions across the country. Many people are directing their frustrations at the President. Perhaps there is a need for greater clarity so that Nigerians understand exactly what is happening,” Ugochinyere said.

He nevertheless described Tuesday’s outcome as a victory for democracy and the rule of law.

“What happened today (Tuesday) is a victory, not just for democracy, but for the rule of law. We are happy because the courts have once again demonstrated their relevance in our democratic process,” he said.

Other parties speak

The Acting National Chairman of the Coalition of United Political Parties,  Peter Ameh, took a philosophical approach in welcoming the ruling, invoking the words of the philosopher Edmund Burke to frame the significance of the appellate court’s intervention.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing,” Ameh said.

He warned that what he described as hostile executive rascality and brazen judicial overreach must not be allowed to stand.

See also  The biggest beneficiaries of the Fourth Republic are the South West - APC chieftain, Adamu Garba

Also, the ADC presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar said in a statement posted on his X handle that the ruling was a positive development, noting with particular significance that INEC itself had initiated the application for the stay .

“I welcome the Court of Appeal’s decision to stay the execution of the Federal High Court judgment seeking the deregistration of our great party, the ADC, and four other political parties. It is particularly significant that INEC itself initiated the application for the stay,” he wrote.

Atiku, Mark protest

The former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar also criticised what he described as judicial contradictions in the ongoing legal dispute, warning that such developments had placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny.

“The disturbing spectacle of judicial contradictions and politically charged rulings playing out in our courts has placed the judiciary under intense public scrutiny. As ADC National Chairman, Sen. David Mark, rightly observed, the judiciary itself is now on trial,” Atiku said.

He warned against any attempt to weaponise the courts against Nigeria’s democratic institutions.

“Any attempt to undermine Nigeria’s hard-won democracy through judicial manipulation is a grave danger to the Republic. If our democracy suffers further injury, history will demand accountability from those entrusted with dispensing justice,” he said.

Following the judgment given by Justice Lifu, the National Judicial Council has been urged to investigate Justice Peter Lifu over his decision to deliver judgment in a case that was already before the Court of Appeal.

The civil society organisation, Tap Initiative for FOR Citizens’ Development, on Tuesday in a statement called on the leadership of the judiciary to immediately investigate Justice Lifu over the judgment.

The call follows concerns over the alleged disregard for the hierarchy of courts and implications such actions could have on the judiciary and Nigeria’s democracy as the country moves closer to the 2027 general elections.

Justice Lifu had on Monday ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties over their alleged breach of Section 225(A) of the Constitution.

However, the judgment was reportedly delivered despite an order staying proceedings issued by the Abuja Division of the Court of Appeal on May 22.

The decision has since attracted criticism from several quarters, with critics accusing the judge of undermining democratic principles.

In a statement signed by its Executive Director, Mbasekei Martin Obono, the group urged the NJC to, among other things, “Determine whether the decision was delivered in disregard of pending appellate proceedings and a subsisting order of stay;

“Examine possible breaches of the judicial code of conduct; Take appropriate disciplinary action if misconduct is established; and

Reaffirm the authority of appellate courts and the supremacy of due process within the judiciary”.

The group recalled that the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, had consistently emphasised the need for accountability, discipline and ethical conduct within the judiciary.

It disclosed that it had formally petitioned the CJN, in her capacity as Chairman of the NJC, seeking an investigation and possible disciplinary action against Justice Lifu.

According to the group, the petition presents an opportunity to reinforce the principles of accountability and demonstrate that judicial independence is not incompatible with responsibility.

“Tap Initiative expresses grave concern that at the time the said judgement was delivered, there were subsisting appellate proceedings before the Court of Appeal in respect of the same subject matter in Appeal No. CA/ABJ/CV/569/2026. Furthermore, the Court of Appeal had issued an Enrolment Order expressly granting a stay of proceedings in Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2025, being the very proceedings in which the Federal High Court subsequently proceeded to deliver judgment.

“This development raises profound constitutional and procedural concerns, as it appears that a valid order of stay and active appellate proceedings were in force at the material time. If established, this situation would constitute a serious affront to the doctrine of judicial hierarchy and the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal within Nigeria’s constitutional order.

See also  APC slams Obi over borrowing criticism, defends Tinubu’s policies

“Tap Initiative emphasizes that the integrity of Nigeria’s justice system depends fundamentally on strict adherence to judicial hierarchy, procedural discipline, and respect for appellate authority. Any deviation from these principles risks creating conflicting judicial outcomes, eroding legal certainty, and undermining public confidence in the courts”, he said.

The group stressed that the judiciary remains the last hope of the common citizen, arguing that its legitimacy is sustained not only by constitutional authority but also by unwavering public confidence in its fairness, discipline and respect for the rule of law.

It therefore called on the NJC to treat the matter with the urgency and seriousness it deserves in the interest of justice, democracy and national stability.

Meanwhile, the National Chairman of the African Democratic Congress, Senator David Mark, on Tuesday declared that the Nigerian judiciary, rather than the opposition party, is the institution facing scrutiny over the controversy surrounding the deregistration of the ADC and four other political parties.

Speaking at the ADC Strategic Communications Retreat in Abuja, the former Senate President accused the judiciary of actions capable of undermining public confidence in the nation’s democratic process, while questioning the conduct of Justice Peter Lifu in matters relating to the party.

According to Mark, the outcome of the controversy will test the credibility of the judiciary and the ability of the National Judicial Council to address concerns arising from the case.

“The ADC is not on trial. Rather, it is the judiciary that is on trial and the nation is waiting to see how the National Judicial Council is going to handle this precarious situation,” he said.

The ADC chairman expressed concern over what he described as unprecedented judicial actions, alleging that Justice Lifu ignored an order of the Court of Appeal directing a stay of proceedings in the matter.

He said it was difficult to comprehend how a judge could be involved in actions that appeared to contradict existing court directives.

Mark further alleged that the judge issued conflicting decisions regarding the status of the party within a short period.

“It is strange that a judge can order the Independent National Electoral Commission to pronounce a party dead and in less than 24 hours put the same party on trial,” he said.

The remarks come amid growing political tension over recent legal challenges affecting opposition parties ahead of preparations for the next electoral cycle.

Despite the legal setback, Mark urged party members not to lose confidence in the ADC, insisting that the party would emerge stronger from the dispute.

“Like I have said previously, our members should not worry about the shenanigans of the ruling party. We will go through all these turbulence because we are up to the task. By the time we are through all these, ADC will come out stronger,” he stated.

The former Senate President also accused the ruling All Progressives Congress APC of attempting to weaken opposition forces through distractions, claiming that the governing party was struggling to defend its record in office.

He alleged that the President Bola Tinubu-led government is diverting attention from its challenges by targeting opposition platforms.

Addressing party communicators at the retreat, Mark charged them to craft messages capable of expanding the ADC’s appeal across political divides, including among members of the ruling party.

He challenged the communications team to develop persuasive narratives that would attract more Nigerians to the ADC project.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Obidient movement condemns court order to scrap ADC, four parties

Published

on

The Obidient Movement has condemned a Federal High Court order directing the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five political parties, describing the ruling as a threat to political inclusion and democratic participation in Nigeria.

The order, delivered on Monday by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, directed INEC to delist the African Democratic Congress, Accord Party, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance and Zenith Labour Party over alleged failure to meet constitutional performance thresholds under Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and the Electoral Act 2022.

The suit was filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators, which asked the court to determine whether INEC is constitutionally bound to deregister parties that fail to meet electoral benchmarks, including winning at least 25 per cent of votes in any state in a presidential election or securing at least one elective office.

Reacting in a statement issued on Tuesday and signed by its National Coordinator, Dr Yunusa Tanko, the Obidient Movement said it was concerned about the implications of the ruling for Nigeria’s democratic space.

The group described itself as “an organic movement driven by the self-sacrifice, commitment, and collective determination of Nigerians who believe that a New Nigeria is Possible,” adding that it is aligned with the political philosophy of Nigeria Democratic Congress presidential candidate, Peter Obi.

It warned that reducing the number of political platforms available to citizens would undermine democratic choice and participation.

According to the statement, “We align strongly with the ideas and principles of His Excellency, Mr. Peter Obi, who has consistently demonstrated a different approach to politics by challenging the dominance of a money-driven political system.”

See also  Governorship aspirants shun consensus deal in 10 states ahead of APC primaries

The movement stressed that democracy must remain open and competitive, arguing that inclusiveness is central to its survival.

It stated: “As believers in democratic values, we are concerned about the deregistration of political parties such as ADC, AA, ZLP and APP.

“A vibrant democracy thrives on inclusiveness, political participation, and the availability of diverse platforms through which citizens can freely express their aspirations and choices.”

The group further said Nigeria’s democratic future must be built on fairness, credible institutions, and stronger citizen participation, rather than restrictions on political actors.

It also reaffirmed its commitment to civic engagement, accountability, and voter mobilisation ahead of future elections, urging Nigerians not to disengage from the political process.

“The future of Nigeria’s democracy must be built on fairness, inclusion, credible institutions, and the active participation of citizens,” the statement added.

The movement encouraged citizens to obtain their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs), describing voting as a key instrument of democratic power.

“Your PVC is more than a card; it is your voice, your power, and your responsibility. Every election is an opportunity to shape the future we desire,” it concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending