Connect with us

Business

States’ capital spending plunges 58% as 2027 politics intensifies

Published

on

The capital expenditure by 26 state governments plunged by N2.19tn within three months in the first quarter of 2026, raising concerns over slowing infrastructure development and worsening fiscal pressures as politics for next year’s elections intensifies.

An analysis of quarter-on-quarter financial reports published on the official websites of the states showed that total capital expenditure fell by N2.20tn, representing a 58.1 per cent decline, from N3.79tn recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N1.59tn in the first quarter of 2026.

Similarly, a breakdown of state government expenditure between January and June 2025 showed that 31 states collectively spent N2.75tn, averaging N1.38tn on capital projects during the six-month period.

The sharp contraction comes amid growing political activities and early alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections, a period analysts say could increasingly shift government attention from long-term infrastructure investments to political calculations and recurrent spending.

The data were obtained by our correspondent in Abuja on Sunday from quarterly budget implementation and financial performance reports uploaded on the official websites of the states.

The figures gathered and analysed by our correspondent indicate a decline of N2.19tn, representing a 57.9 per cent drop within three months, highlighting a slowdown in infrastructure and development spending across many states.

The findings are against the backdrop of a PUNCH report that the external debt of 32 states and the Federal Capital Territory climbed to nearly $5.7bn in fresh loans in 2025, pushing subnational foreign debt sharply higher year-on-year despite increased inflows from Federation Account Allocation Committee allocations.

The data showed that only one state, Oyo, recorded a significant increase in capital expenditure during the period under review, while most states posted sharp declines in spending.

The PUNCH reports that state government capital expenditure is the money set aside for development projects and public infrastructure that will benefit residents over a long period.

It is meant for building and improving facilities such as roads, schools, hospitals, water projects, housing, electricity infrastructure, public transport systems, and other major projects that support economic growth and public welfare. The aim is to create assets that improve living conditions, attract investment, create jobs, and boost economic activities within the state.

An increase in capital expenditure means more investment in critical infrastructure aimed at improving the welfare of the people, while a reduction indicates slower infrastructure development and fewer completed projects.

Out of the 36 states, only 26 had uploaded their financial data as of the time of filing this report, while 10 states had yet to publish their first-quarter financial performance reports.

The states that published their financial data are Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Benue, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Kogi, Kwara, Lagos, Niger, Ondo, Oyo, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe, and Zamfara.

The states whose data were unavailable are Abia, Anambra, Delta, Edo, Imo, Nasarawa, Ogun, Osun, Plateau, and Rivers.

Breakdown of figures

A breakdown of the figures showed that Lagos retained its position as the highest spending state on capital projects despite recording a decline. Lagos spent N340.76bn on capital projects in the first quarter of 2026, down from N535.46bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. This represents a decline of N194.70bn or 36.4 per cent.

See also  Lawmakers oppose dollar billing for local petrol sales

However, Oyo emerged as the only major exception to the nationwide slowdown. The state increased its capital expenditure from N105.35bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N231.27bn in the first quarter of 2026. The increase of N125.93bn represents a 119.5 per cent rise, making Oyo the state with the highest growth rate during the period.

The sharp increase in Oyo’s spending coincided with the state’s borrowing profile, as the state also recorded the highest loan figure among the reporting states. Oyo borrowed N164.88bn in the first quarter of 2026.

Akwa Ibom recorded one of the biggest spending cuts among the states reviewed. The oil-rich state reduced its capital expenditure from N428.64bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N137.39bn in the first quarter of 2026. The drop of N291.26bn represents a 67.9 per cent decline.

Bayelsa also posted a steep decline. Its capital expenditure fell from N384.81bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N77.51bn in the first quarter of 2026. This translates to a decrease of N307.30bn or 79.9 per cent.

Enugu recorded one of the sharpest contractions in percentage terms. The state’s capital spending plunged from N365.69bn to N31.37bn. The decline of N334.33bn represents a massive 91.4 per cent reduction.

Kano also witnessed a decline in spending, though less severe compared to several other states. The state’s capital expenditure dropped from N141.29bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N121.96bn in the first quarter of 2026. The decline of N19.33bn represents a 13.7 per cent decrease.

Niger State reduced its capital expenditure from N116.05bn to N79.28bn. The drop of N36.77bn represents a decline of 31.7 per cent. The state, however, recorded borrowings of N39.28bn during the period.

Bauchi spent N85.39bn in the first quarter of 2026 compared to N94.45bn in the previous quarter. This represents a decline of N9.06bn or 9.6 per cent. The state also recorded borrowings of N56.57bn.

Jigawa’s capital expenditure dropped from N193.88bn to N60.62bn. The decline of N133.26bn represents a 68.7 per cent reduction.

Kaduna reduced its capital spending from N106.92bn to N39.51bn. The state recorded a decline of N67.41bn or 63.1 per cent.

Katsina’s capital expenditure fell from N227.80bn to N55.08bn. The drop of N172.73bn represents a 75.8 per cent decline.

Benue recorded capital expenditure of N25.42bn in the first quarter of 2026, down from N114.59bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. This represents a decline of N89.17bn or 77.8 per cent.

Cross River’s capital expenditure dropped from N114.32bn to N19.48bn. The reduction of N94.84bn represents an 83 per cent decline.

Ebonyi reduced its spending from N118.10bn to N31.77bn. The decline of N86.34bn represents a 73.1 per cent decrease.

Ekiti’s capital expenditure fell from N50.05bn to N16.92bn. This represents a drop of N33.12bn or 66.2 per cent.

See also  Tax law: N5tn VAT windfall for states as new formula begins

Gombe spent N36.19bn in the first quarter of 2026 against N68.06bn in the previous quarter. The state recorded a decline of N31.87bn or 46.8 per cent.

Kebbi reduced its capital spending from N55.87bn to N17.43bn. This represents a decline of N38.44bn or 68.8 per cent.

Kogi’s expenditure dropped from N48.40bn to N21.52bn. The decline of N26.88bn represents a 55.5 per cent reduction.

Kwara recorded capital expenditure of N13.68bn in the first quarter of 2026 compared to N61.65bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. The drop of N47.97bn represents a 77.8 per cent decline.

Ondo reduced capital spending from N52.49bn to N13.56bn. This represents a decline of N38.94bn or 74.2 per cent.

Sokoto’s capital expenditure fell from N59.31bn to N16.82bn. The decline of N42.49bn represents a 71.6 per cent reduction.

Taraba spent N16.91bn in the first quarter of 2026, compared to N26.77bn in the previous quarter. The state recorded a decline of N9.85bn or 36.8 per cent.

Yobe’s capital expenditure dropped from N76.74bn to N31.79bn. The decline of N44.95bn represents a 58.6 per cent decrease.

Zamfara reduced spending from N104.04bn to N28.99bn. The state recorded a decline of N75.05bn or 72.1 per cent.

Adamawa also posted a steep decline. The state’s capital expenditure dropped from N90.77bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N22.93bn in the first quarter of 2026. This represents a decline of N67.84bn or 74.7 per cent.

Borno’s spending declined from N46.89bn to N19.91bn. The drop of N26.98bn represents a 57.5 per cent reduction.

An analysis of the first quarter 2026 financial reports of 26 states showed that subnational governments borrowed a combined N361.98bn within three months despite a widespread decline in capital expenditure across the country.

Oyo recorded the highest borrowing figure at N164.88bn, accounting for nearly half of the total loans obtained by the reporting states during the period. Bauchi followed with N56.57bn, while Niger borrowed N39.28bn. Taraba secured fresh loans worth N23.4bn, while Ebonyi and Yobe borrowed N20bn each.

Katsina obtained N8.55bn in loans, Kaduna recorded borrowings of N8.06bn, while Gombe borrowed N7.61bn. Jigawa secured N6.27bn, Ekiti borrowed N3.01bn, while Borno obtained N2.85bn.

Kwara recorded loans worth N438.88m, Ondo borrowed N300m, while Kogi posted the lowest borrowing figure at N5.32m.

The figures showed that 13 of the 26 states that published their financial reports recorded fresh borrowings in the first quarter of 2026, highlighting the growing reliance on debt financing amid rising fiscal pressures and slowing capital spending.

Analysts speak

Analysts said the sharp drop in capital expenditure may reflect the typical slowdown that follows aggressive end-of-year spending by governments trying to implement annual budgets before year-end deadlines.

Economic experts also noted that the decline could be linked to rising debt obligations, revenue pressures, and adjustments following the implementation of fiscal reforms.

A Professor of Economics at Babcock University, Segun Ajibola, stated that the enduring problem of high governance expenses had persisted at the state level, with inadequate oversight and accountability resulting in minimal economic benefits for grassroots citizens.

The Director and Chief Economist at Proshare Nigeria LLC, Teslim Shitta-Bey, warned that the rising debt burden on Nigeria’s subnational governments could challenge their fiscal stability in the coming years. He stressed that most state governments, along with the Federal Government, had failed to effectively manage their balance sheets.

See also  New tax regime: What’s true, what’s not

Speaking recently to The PUNCH, Shitta-Bey said, “The challenge here is that most of the governments, including the Federal Government, are unable to manage their balance sheets properly. While borrowing might seem like an easy way to run operations, it is not necessarily the right approach.”

According to Shitta-Bey, borrowing should not be the default solution for governments. “Governments could consider longer-term debt structures that resemble equity, which might actually be more beneficial in the long run,” he explained.

A macroeconomic analyst, Dayo Adenubi, also emphasised the need for states to take more targeted steps toward boosting internally generated revenue as they grapple with rising debt obligations and constrained federal transfers.

However, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, posited that capital expenditure usually records slower spending in the early part of the year because of lengthy procurement and contracting procedures.

According to him, unlike recurrent expenditure, which covers regular expenses such as salaries, travels, and other day-to-day government operations, capital projects require more bureaucratic processes before funds can be disbursed.

Muda, speaking during a telephone interview on Sunday, said, “On capital expenditure, the process is usually longer. The contracting processes, procurement, and tendering take more time. It is not like recurrent expenditure, where spending happens every day through salaries, travels, and the like.

“For capital expenditure, there are usually more disbursements around the second and third quarter because by then they would have concluded most of the procurement processes, which are often very bureaucratic. It also involves huge sums of money, and payments are not made at once. So, for capital expenditure to gather momentum, it usually gets to the second or third quarter before you begin to see significant spending.”

The reduction in capital spending by many states could have implications for economic growth, job creation, and infrastructure development, especially at a time when subnational governments are expected to play a larger role in driving economic activities.

Strong spending

Despite the slowdown, some states maintained relatively strong spending levels. Lagos, Oyo, Akwa Ibom, Kano, and Bauchi emerged as the top five states in terms of capital expenditure in the first quarter of 2026.

The figures also showed that several states relied on borrowings to support spending amid declining revenues and rising fiscal pressures.

Financial analysts have repeatedly warned that increasing debt accumulation without corresponding revenue growth may worsen fiscal sustainability challenges for subnational governments.

However, state governments have argued that borrowings remain necessary to finance critical infrastructure projects and bridge funding gaps.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Read how Nigerians tap savings, loans to buy Dangote refinery shares

Published

on

Some Nigerians seeking to invest in the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE Initial Public Offering have turned to personal savings, loans and proceeds from the sale of assets to raise funds to buy shares, Saturday PUNCH has learnt.

Findings by our correspondents revealed strong interest in the shares among prospective retail investors, some of whom said they expected the investment to yield substantial returns in the future.

While some respondents said they were dipping into savings or raising funds through other means, others said the prevailing economic hardship had made it difficult for them to participate in the offer.

The refinery opened its IPO on Monday, September 14, giving Nigerians an opportunity to own equity in the company.

The offer comprises 4.1 billion ordinary shares priced at N525 each, with the company targeting about N2.15tn to part-fund an expansion that would nearly double the refinery’s capacity to 1.4 million barrels per day.

The minimum subscription is 10 shares, costing N5,250.

Dangote Group Chief Executive Officer, Aliko Dangote, said the low entry threshold was deliberately set to allow ordinary workers, including drivers, cooks and domestic staff, to become shareholders, describing the offer as “the IPO for the people.”

The offer is expected to close on October 13.

Investors turn to savings, loans

A staff member of the Federal Ministry of Works, David Adelabu, described the shares as expensive for struggling civil servants but said he considered the offer an opportunity to become a shareholder in the refinery.

He said, “I have small shares in some companies, including Glo and MTN, but Dangote’s shares will be the highest I will be buying. It is on the high side, but I feel this is an opportunity to become a shareholder in Dangote.

“I understand that the dividends are not going to be immediate, but I don’t mind even if it will entail selling a plot of land I have in Metumbi here in Minna. I will gladly do so.”

A trader in Dutse, Jigawa State, Adamu Bala, said he planned to use savings from his business to buy the shares.

See also  Adamawa gov Fintiri defects to APC

“I will not sell my house. I will use a small profit from my shop to buy,” he said.

Similarly, a civil servant, Fatima Mannir, said women in her group had started raising money through contributions, known as adashe, to participate in the offer.

“We have started raising money through adashe,” she said.

A trader in Damaturu, Yobe State, Malam Musa Ibrahim, said he invested part of his business savings after learning about the offer.

“I am using part of the money I have saved from my business.

“I believe that if I can invest a small amount now, it may become useful to me in the future. But I am also being careful because business is not easy at the moment,” he said.

Another resident, Aisha Mohammed, said she raised money by cutting down on some household expenses.

“I did not borrow money to buy the shares. I have been saving little by little, and when I heard about the offer, I decided to use part of what I had saved,” she said.

A businessman, Abdullahi Yusuf, however, said he obtained financial assistance from a friend to increase his subscription.

“I wanted to buy more shares than what my savings could afford, so I discussed it with a friend who agreed to lend me some money.

“I know that borrowing money to invest carries risks, but I am hoping that the investment will perform well. I will repay the money from my business income,” he said.

A petty trader, Hauwa Lawan, said she sold some personal belongings she no longer used and added the proceeds to her savings to finance her purchase.

“I sold some things that I was no longer using and added the money to my savings,” she said.

A farmer, Mallam Abdullahi Adamu, said he sold farm produce to raise about N500,000 to invest in the shares.

In Kano State, an investor, Abdulmalik Ibrahim, said he bought 10 shares for N5,250 using personal funds.

Hardship keeps some investors away

While some Nigerians are finding ways to participate in the IPO, others said economic pressures had put the investment beyond their reach.

See also  PHOTOS: Gov. Abiodun meets investors in China, seeks expansion of Ogun economic frontiers

A civil servant in Kogi State, Saliu Joseph, said he would have loved to invest but had just paid his children’s school fees.

“Right now, I don’t think I can afford to participate unless a miracle happens,” he said.

A retired permanent secretary in the state, Bola Boro, also said he would not participate because he could not afford the investment at the moment.

“As a retired civil servant, I cannot afford such an amount to invest in the offer. Even though I am a fan of investment through the stock market, which I have been doing for years, I don’t think it will be convenient for me to participate considering the time frame of just one month,” he said.

A civil servant, Kuta Abdulahi, said the financial demands of his children’s education had left him unable to participate in the share offer.

“I must tell you the truth, I know about the Dangote Refinery shares, but I cannot even think of it at this time. My children are just resuming a new term in school. Where will I get the money for their school fees before thinking of buying shares? Please, I have a lot on my head,” he said.

Similarly, a vulcaniser, Ahmed Alkali, said his income was barely enough to meet his family’s basic needs, making investment in shares difficult.

“With the kind of job I do, I am working from hand to mouth. So, how can I buy shares when I have not eaten?” he asked.

Experts warn against borrowing

Investment experts, however, cautioned Nigerians against taking loans, selling properties or committing all their savings to the IPO, warning that equity investments carry risks.

Speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the Group Managing Director of Lancelot Group, Adebayo Adeleke, urged prospective investors to understand the risks associated with the capital market before committing their funds to the IPO.

Adeleke, who is also a former Secretary of the Independent Shareholders Association of Nigeria, said capital market investments should be made with funds that investors could afford to leave untouched for the long term, noting that equities were unsuitable for people struggling to meet immediate financial needs.

He said, “When you buy shares, you are buying a portion of the ownership of the business. Investment takes a lot of time to pass through gestation, to stability, to profitability. And you cannot, with any degree of certainty, predict when the company is going to turn the corner and begin to produce profits.

See also  Ending over-the-counter antibiotics sales to tackle antimicrobial resistance

“So, investment money is not the money you are likely to need in the next two months, three months, six months, even one year. If you cannot part with your money for a minimum of three to five years, the capital market is not the place to invest.”

Adeleke, however, described the IPO as a strategic investment, citing the refinery’s scale and demand for its products.

Also speaking, the Head of Financial Institutions Ratings at Agusto & Co., Ayokunle Olubunmi, urged Nigerians to consider the risks associated with the investment and avoid committing all their savings to the offer.

He said, “There are plenty of risks to this business. It’s not risk-free. Things can get worse for the business. Valuation is based on expectations of what will happen in the future. Things might not go as planned. And, like we all know, equity is a risky business.”

Olubunmi particularly cautioned prospective investors against selling property or using up all their savings to invest in the offer.

He advised them to invest only a portion of their funds and diversify their portfolios.

The expert also advised those considering taking loans to buy the shares to have a separate and reliable repayment plan rather than depending on returns from the investment.

The Emir of Kano, Muhammadu Sanusi II, had earlier warned prospective investors against using their children’s school fees or selling their homes to invest in the shares.

Sanusi, who gave the warning on Thursday while speaking at the company’s roadshow in Kano, urged prospective investors to invest only money they could afford to set aside for some time, suggesting amounts such as N10,000, N20,000 or N30,000.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

ARE NIGERIANS BUILDING CHINA’S ECONOMY WHILE NEGLECTING THEIR OWN?

Published

on

While other nations are busy producing, manufacturing and exporting, Nigeria must ask itself a difficult question: Are we building our own economy, or simply creating a bigger market for other countries?

Nigeria has a huge population, abundant natural resources and a massive consumer market. Yet the country continues to depend heavily on imported finished products—from electronics and clothing to machinery, household goods and other consumer items.

The issue is not simply about Chinese businesses or businesses from any other foreign country operating in Nigeria. Foreign investment can bring capital, technology, jobs and expertise.

The bigger issue is whether **Nigerian businesses are being given the opportunity and support to manufacture competitively at home.

Instead of remaining primarily a consumer of finished products, Nigeria needs to strengthen its manufacturing sector and move further up the value chain.

Nigeria needs to produce, not just consume.

A stronger manufacturing economy could help Nigeria:

* Create more jobs for Nigerians
* Add value to locally available raw materials
* Develop industrial skills and technology
* Reduce excessive dependence on imported finished goods
* Build competitive Nigerian companies
* Increase the country’s ability to export

The goal should not be to drive legitimate foreign businesses out of Nigeria. The goal should be to build an economy where **Nigerian manufacturers can compete, grow and eventually take Nigerian-made products to markets around the world.

The question Nigerians should be asking is simple:

**Why should Nigeria remain one of the world’s biggest markets for finished products when we have the potential to manufacture many of them ourselves?

See also  CBN reduces interest rate to 27%

🇳🇬 **Nigeria must move from being predominantly a consumer nation to becoming a stronger producer, manufacturer and exporter.

What do you think?

Which products should Nigeria prioritize for local manufacturing instead of relying heavily on imports?

Share your thoughts in the comments.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

ICRC defends toll pricing on highways

Published

on

The Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission has defended the toll pricing structure under the Highway Development and Management Initiative, saying charges are evaluated against the quality and benefits of the upgraded roads.

In a statement made available to PUNCH Online on Thursday, the Director-General, Dr. Jobson Ewalefoh, cited the 227-kilometre Akwanga–Makurdi road corridor as an example.

He said the route has four toll gates, and motorists pay as they travel along it.

He argued that toll payments should be viewed against the previous costs imposed by the poor condition of the road, including lost man-hours, vehicle damage and accident risks.

Feedback from road users, he said, shows many motorists are willing to pay tolls where they see clear improvements in road quality.

Some drivers have expressed support for similar arrangements on other major corridors if the roads are upgraded to the same standard.

“That, to me, is the beauty of a well-structured PPP,” Ewalefoh said.

He explained that negotiators carefully consider toll pricing to keep charges fair. A portion of the revenue is set aside specifically for road maintenance. Under the concession agreements, the government does not bear additional maintenance costs for the duration of the contract.

The government must repair potholes within 48 hours, and it funds major routine repairs from the dedicated toll revenue.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Technology key to implementing new tax laws – Adedeji
Continue Reading

Trending