Connect with us

Business

States’ capital spending plunges 58% as 2027 politics intensifies

Published

on

The capital expenditure by 26 state governments plunged by N2.19tn within three months in the first quarter of 2026, raising concerns over slowing infrastructure development and worsening fiscal pressures as politics for next year’s elections intensifies.

An analysis of quarter-on-quarter financial reports published on the official websites of the states showed that total capital expenditure fell by N2.20tn, representing a 58.1 per cent decline, from N3.79tn recorded in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N1.59tn in the first quarter of 2026.

Similarly, a breakdown of state government expenditure between January and June 2025 showed that 31 states collectively spent N2.75tn, averaging N1.38tn on capital projects during the six-month period.

The sharp contraction comes amid growing political activities and early alignments ahead of the 2027 general elections, a period analysts say could increasingly shift government attention from long-term infrastructure investments to political calculations and recurrent spending.

The data were obtained by our correspondent in Abuja on Sunday from quarterly budget implementation and financial performance reports uploaded on the official websites of the states.

The figures gathered and analysed by our correspondent indicate a decline of N2.19tn, representing a 57.9 per cent drop within three months, highlighting a slowdown in infrastructure and development spending across many states.

The findings are against the backdrop of a PUNCH report that the external debt of 32 states and the Federal Capital Territory climbed to nearly $5.7bn in fresh loans in 2025, pushing subnational foreign debt sharply higher year-on-year despite increased inflows from Federation Account Allocation Committee allocations.

The data showed that only one state, Oyo, recorded a significant increase in capital expenditure during the period under review, while most states posted sharp declines in spending.

The PUNCH reports that state government capital expenditure is the money set aside for development projects and public infrastructure that will benefit residents over a long period.

It is meant for building and improving facilities such as roads, schools, hospitals, water projects, housing, electricity infrastructure, public transport systems, and other major projects that support economic growth and public welfare. The aim is to create assets that improve living conditions, attract investment, create jobs, and boost economic activities within the state.

An increase in capital expenditure means more investment in critical infrastructure aimed at improving the welfare of the people, while a reduction indicates slower infrastructure development and fewer completed projects.

Out of the 36 states, only 26 had uploaded their financial data as of the time of filing this report, while 10 states had yet to publish their first-quarter financial performance reports.

The states that published their financial data are Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Benue, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kebbi, Kogi, Kwara, Lagos, Niger, Ondo, Oyo, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe, and Zamfara.

The states whose data were unavailable are Abia, Anambra, Delta, Edo, Imo, Nasarawa, Ogun, Osun, Plateau, and Rivers.

Breakdown of figures

A breakdown of the figures showed that Lagos retained its position as the highest spending state on capital projects despite recording a decline. Lagos spent N340.76bn on capital projects in the first quarter of 2026, down from N535.46bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. This represents a decline of N194.70bn or 36.4 per cent.

See also  11 killed, 50 houses burnt in Nasarawa community clashes

However, Oyo emerged as the only major exception to the nationwide slowdown. The state increased its capital expenditure from N105.35bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N231.27bn in the first quarter of 2026. The increase of N125.93bn represents a 119.5 per cent rise, making Oyo the state with the highest growth rate during the period.

The sharp increase in Oyo’s spending coincided with the state’s borrowing profile, as the state also recorded the highest loan figure among the reporting states. Oyo borrowed N164.88bn in the first quarter of 2026.

Akwa Ibom recorded one of the biggest spending cuts among the states reviewed. The oil-rich state reduced its capital expenditure from N428.64bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N137.39bn in the first quarter of 2026. The drop of N291.26bn represents a 67.9 per cent decline.

Bayelsa also posted a steep decline. Its capital expenditure fell from N384.81bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N77.51bn in the first quarter of 2026. This translates to a decrease of N307.30bn or 79.9 per cent.

Enugu recorded one of the sharpest contractions in percentage terms. The state’s capital spending plunged from N365.69bn to N31.37bn. The decline of N334.33bn represents a massive 91.4 per cent reduction.

Kano also witnessed a decline in spending, though less severe compared to several other states. The state’s capital expenditure dropped from N141.29bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N121.96bn in the first quarter of 2026. The decline of N19.33bn represents a 13.7 per cent decrease.

Niger State reduced its capital expenditure from N116.05bn to N79.28bn. The drop of N36.77bn represents a decline of 31.7 per cent. The state, however, recorded borrowings of N39.28bn during the period.

Bauchi spent N85.39bn in the first quarter of 2026 compared to N94.45bn in the previous quarter. This represents a decline of N9.06bn or 9.6 per cent. The state also recorded borrowings of N56.57bn.

Jigawa’s capital expenditure dropped from N193.88bn to N60.62bn. The decline of N133.26bn represents a 68.7 per cent reduction.

Kaduna reduced its capital spending from N106.92bn to N39.51bn. The state recorded a decline of N67.41bn or 63.1 per cent.

Katsina’s capital expenditure fell from N227.80bn to N55.08bn. The drop of N172.73bn represents a 75.8 per cent decline.

Benue recorded capital expenditure of N25.42bn in the first quarter of 2026, down from N114.59bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. This represents a decline of N89.17bn or 77.8 per cent.

Cross River’s capital expenditure dropped from N114.32bn to N19.48bn. The reduction of N94.84bn represents an 83 per cent decline.

Ebonyi reduced its spending from N118.10bn to N31.77bn. The decline of N86.34bn represents a 73.1 per cent decrease.

Ekiti’s capital expenditure fell from N50.05bn to N16.92bn. This represents a drop of N33.12bn or 66.2 per cent.

See also  Dangote faces price war as NNPC backs fuel imports

Gombe spent N36.19bn in the first quarter of 2026 against N68.06bn in the previous quarter. The state recorded a decline of N31.87bn or 46.8 per cent.

Kebbi reduced its capital spending from N55.87bn to N17.43bn. This represents a decline of N38.44bn or 68.8 per cent.

Kogi’s expenditure dropped from N48.40bn to N21.52bn. The decline of N26.88bn represents a 55.5 per cent reduction.

Kwara recorded capital expenditure of N13.68bn in the first quarter of 2026 compared to N61.65bn in the fourth quarter of 2025. The drop of N47.97bn represents a 77.8 per cent decline.

Ondo reduced capital spending from N52.49bn to N13.56bn. This represents a decline of N38.94bn or 74.2 per cent.

Sokoto’s capital expenditure fell from N59.31bn to N16.82bn. The decline of N42.49bn represents a 71.6 per cent reduction.

Taraba spent N16.91bn in the first quarter of 2026, compared to N26.77bn in the previous quarter. The state recorded a decline of N9.85bn or 36.8 per cent.

Yobe’s capital expenditure dropped from N76.74bn to N31.79bn. The decline of N44.95bn represents a 58.6 per cent decrease.

Zamfara reduced spending from N104.04bn to N28.99bn. The state recorded a decline of N75.05bn or 72.1 per cent.

Adamawa also posted a steep decline. The state’s capital expenditure dropped from N90.77bn in the fourth quarter of 2025 to N22.93bn in the first quarter of 2026. This represents a decline of N67.84bn or 74.7 per cent.

Borno’s spending declined from N46.89bn to N19.91bn. The drop of N26.98bn represents a 57.5 per cent reduction.

An analysis of the first quarter 2026 financial reports of 26 states showed that subnational governments borrowed a combined N361.98bn within three months despite a widespread decline in capital expenditure across the country.

Oyo recorded the highest borrowing figure at N164.88bn, accounting for nearly half of the total loans obtained by the reporting states during the period. Bauchi followed with N56.57bn, while Niger borrowed N39.28bn. Taraba secured fresh loans worth N23.4bn, while Ebonyi and Yobe borrowed N20bn each.

Katsina obtained N8.55bn in loans, Kaduna recorded borrowings of N8.06bn, while Gombe borrowed N7.61bn. Jigawa secured N6.27bn, Ekiti borrowed N3.01bn, while Borno obtained N2.85bn.

Kwara recorded loans worth N438.88m, Ondo borrowed N300m, while Kogi posted the lowest borrowing figure at N5.32m.

The figures showed that 13 of the 26 states that published their financial reports recorded fresh borrowings in the first quarter of 2026, highlighting the growing reliance on debt financing amid rising fiscal pressures and slowing capital spending.

Analysts speak

Analysts said the sharp drop in capital expenditure may reflect the typical slowdown that follows aggressive end-of-year spending by governments trying to implement annual budgets before year-end deadlines.

Economic experts also noted that the decline could be linked to rising debt obligations, revenue pressures, and adjustments following the implementation of fiscal reforms.

A Professor of Economics at Babcock University, Segun Ajibola, stated that the enduring problem of high governance expenses had persisted at the state level, with inadequate oversight and accountability resulting in minimal economic benefits for grassroots citizens.

See also  President Trump orders firing of Labor statistics chef over unemployment in US

The Director and Chief Economist at Proshare Nigeria LLC, Teslim Shitta-Bey, warned that the rising debt burden on Nigeria’s subnational governments could challenge their fiscal stability in the coming years. He stressed that most state governments, along with the Federal Government, had failed to effectively manage their balance sheets.

Speaking recently to The PUNCH, Shitta-Bey said, “The challenge here is that most of the governments, including the Federal Government, are unable to manage their balance sheets properly. While borrowing might seem like an easy way to run operations, it is not necessarily the right approach.”

According to Shitta-Bey, borrowing should not be the default solution for governments. “Governments could consider longer-term debt structures that resemble equity, which might actually be more beneficial in the long run,” he explained.

A macroeconomic analyst, Dayo Adenubi, also emphasised the need for states to take more targeted steps toward boosting internally generated revenue as they grapple with rising debt obligations and constrained federal transfers.

However, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, posited that capital expenditure usually records slower spending in the early part of the year because of lengthy procurement and contracting procedures.

According to him, unlike recurrent expenditure, which covers regular expenses such as salaries, travels, and other day-to-day government operations, capital projects require more bureaucratic processes before funds can be disbursed.

Muda, speaking during a telephone interview on Sunday, said, “On capital expenditure, the process is usually longer. The contracting processes, procurement, and tendering take more time. It is not like recurrent expenditure, where spending happens every day through salaries, travels, and the like.

“For capital expenditure, there are usually more disbursements around the second and third quarter because by then they would have concluded most of the procurement processes, which are often very bureaucratic. It also involves huge sums of money, and payments are not made at once. So, for capital expenditure to gather momentum, it usually gets to the second or third quarter before you begin to see significant spending.”

The reduction in capital spending by many states could have implications for economic growth, job creation, and infrastructure development, especially at a time when subnational governments are expected to play a larger role in driving economic activities.

Strong spending

Despite the slowdown, some states maintained relatively strong spending levels. Lagos, Oyo, Akwa Ibom, Kano, and Bauchi emerged as the top five states in terms of capital expenditure in the first quarter of 2026.

The figures also showed that several states relied on borrowings to support spending amid declining revenues and rising fiscal pressures.

Financial analysts have repeatedly warned that increasing debt accumulation without corresponding revenue growth may worsen fiscal sustainability challenges for subnational governments.

However, state governments have argued that borrowings remain necessary to finance critical infrastructure projects and bridge funding gaps.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Dangote faces price war as NNPC backs fuel imports

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  Tinubu reinstates Fubara after Emergency Rule

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  Barcelona to face Athletic Club at renovated Camp Nou Stadium

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  Royal rumble: Inside power struggle rocking Oyo Obas’ council

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending