Connect with us

News

Tinubu reinstates Fubara after Emergency Rule

Published

on

Siminalayi Fubara will today resume duties as Governor of Rivers State, following the end of the six-month emergency rule imposed on the state by President Bola Tinubu.

The President, on Wednesday, announced an end to the emergency rule he declared in Rivers State on March 18, 2025.

In a statement on the cessation of the emergency rule, made available by the Presidency, the President said, “The Governor, His Excellency Siminalayi Fubara, the deputy governor, Her Excellency Ngozi Odu, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly and the speaker, Martins Amaewhule, will resume work in their offices from September 18, 2025…

“It, therefore, gives me great pleasure to declare that the emergency in Rivers State of Nigeria shall end with effect from midnight today.”

He added, “I am happy today that, from the intelligence available to me, there is a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding, a robust readiness, and potent enthusiasm on the part of all the stakeholders in Rivers State for an immediate return to democratic governance.

“This is undoubtedly a welcome development for me and a remarkable achievement for us. I, therefore, do not see why the state of emergency should exist a day longer than the six months I had pronounced at the beginning of it.”

To restore democracy, which he suspended by appointing Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas as Sole Administrator, the President asked all elected officials to resume their offices effective from midnight of September 18.

The political crisis in Rivers State has been one of Nigeria’s fiercest power struggles in recent years, rooted in a battle between Fubara and his predecessor-turned-political godfather, Nyesom Wike, now Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

When Fubara emerged as governor in May 2023, he was widely seen as Wike’s protégé. The relationship, however, turned sour over control of political structures, state resources, and loyalty ahead of the 2027 elections.

By late 2023, the crisis escalated as the state House of Assembly split, with the majority siding with Wike, while a minority remained loyal to Fubara.

Moves to impeach the governor triggered street protests, legal battles, and even violence as the Assembly building was set ablaze during the height of tensions, symbolising the depth of the political breakdown.

President Tinubu brokered a peace deal in December 2023, compelling Fubara to recognise the Amaewhule-led lawmakers who had declared their defection to the All Progressives Congress. The Abuja controversial agreement was criticised by many gladiators, describing it as unconstitutional.

Despite the truce, parallel legislative sessions, disputed budgets, and allegations of intimidation persisted. Both camps entrenched themselves further, drawing in national political forces and destabilising governance in the oil-rich state.

The height of the tensions was the February 28, 2025, judgment of the Supreme Court, which recognised the Amaewhule-led Assembly as the authentic in the state.

Hitherto, Fubara had recognised and given validity to the Victor Oko-Jumbo-led assembly.

The apex court also ordered the embattled governor to re-present the 2024 budget, while halting the release of funds by the Federal Government to the state.

It also declared the controversial local government election conducted by Fubara on October 5, 2024, as invalid and sacked the elected council chairmen.

The battle line was then drawn between Fubara and the Amaewhule-led Assembly, leading to heightened tension in the state.

The assembly, playing hide-and-seek, asked the governor to present the 2024 budget, even after the 2025 budget had been passed by the Oko-Jumbo three-man faction, though attempts by the governor to meet with the members failed.

As the tempers rose, locals and ex-agitators threatened to tamper with oil installations should Fubara be impeached, as threatened by the Amaewhule-led assembly in a notice sent to the governor.

A day before Tinubu imposed emergency rule, an explosion rocked a section of the Trans Niger Pipeline in the Bodo Community of Gonna Local Government Area in Rivers State. The following day, another explosion severed a pipeline manifold in the Omwawriwa axis of Ogba-Egbema-Ndoni Local Government Area of the State.

The President expressed concern over vandalism by militants, allegedly acting in support of Fubara. The attacks occurred amid desperate efforts by the Tinubu administration to increase Nigeria’s lagging crude oil output and curb leaks.

To forestall a breakdown of law and order and protect vital oil installations essential to uninterrupted production and the economy, President Tinubu, on March 18, 2025, declared a state of emergency in Rivers State and suspended all democratic institutions.

The declaration was faulted by civil society groups, opposition political parties, Rivers indigenes, especially women, but the President justified his intervention, saying he was constitutionally empowered to  intervene to prevent breakdown of law and order.

In his Wednesday statement, Tinubu said, “You will recall that on March 18, 2025, I proclaimed a state of emergency in the State. The summary of it for context is that there was a total paralysis of governance in Rivers State, which had led to the Governor of Rivers State and the House of Assembly being unable to work together.”

He cited vandalism of “critical economic assets of the State, including oil pipelines,” and a split legislature in which “four members worked with the Governor, while 27 members opposed the Governor…As a result, the Governor could not present any Appropriation Bill to the House, to enable him to access funds to run Rivers State’s affairs.”

Tinubu said attempts by himself and “other well-meaning Nigerians” to broker peace failed, prompting him “to invoke the powers conferred on me by Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, to proclaim the state of emergency.”

He noted that “the offices of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and elected members of the State House of Assembly were suspended for six months in the first instance. The six months expire today, September 17, 2025.”

Thanking lawmakers for approving the proclamation, Tinubu added: “I thank the National Assembly, which, after critically evaluating the justification for the proclamation, took steps immediately, as required by the Constitution, to approve the declaration in the interest of peace and order in Rivers State. I also thank our traditional rulers and the good people of Rivers State for their support from the date of the declaration of the State of emergency until now.”

He acknowledged some legal challenges, saying, “I am not unaware that there were a few voices of dissent against the proclamation, which led to their instituting over 40 cases in the courts in Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Yenagoa, to invalidate the declaration…But what needs to be said is that the power to declare a state of emergency is an inbuilt constitutional tool to address situations of actual or threatened breakdown of public order and public safety, which require extraordinary measures to return the State to peace, order and security.”

See also  Court freezes four bank accounts linked to Mele Kyari

Referencing court proceedings, the President said, “Considering objectively, we had reached that situation of total breakdown of public order and public safety in Rivers State, as shown in the judgment of the Supreme Court on the disputes between the Executive and the Legislative arm of Rivers State. It would have been a colossal failure on my part as President not to have made that proclamation.”

Tinubu urged cooperation between branches of government, advising, “As a stakeholder in democratic governance, I believe that the need for a harmonious existence and relationship between the executive and the legislature is key to a successful government, whether at the state or national level.

“However, that expectation will remain unrealisable in an atmosphere of violence, anarchy, and insecurity borne by misguided political activism and Machiavellian manipulations among the stakeholders.”

The President acknowledged that the conditions had improved after reconciliation between rival factions, which he described as “a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding.”

“I am happy today that, from the intelligence available to me, there is a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding, a robust readiness, and potent enthusiasm on the part of all the stakeholders in Rivers State for an immediate return to democratic governance.

“I therefore do not see why the State of emergency should exist a day longer than the six months I had pronounced at the beginning of it. It therefore gives me great pleasure to declare that the emergency in Rivers State of Nigeria shall end with effect from midnight today.

“I take this opportunity to remind the Governors and the Houses of Assembly of all the States of our country to continue to appreciate that it is only in an atmosphere of peace, order, and good government that we can deliver the dividends of democracy to our people. I implore all of you to let this realisation drive your actions at all times.”

Winners

President Tinubu emerges as the ultimate winner. Justifying his intervention in a statement on Wednesday, the President declared: “It would have been a colossal failure on my part as President not to have made that proclamation.”

For an administration striving to revive the economy from a comatose state, Tinubu was unwilling to risk anything that could cripple its mainstay—oil. His greatest concern was that critical national assets in Rivers, particularly oil pipelines, had come under repeated vandalism amid the heightened political tension.

The emergency declaration not only quelled the unrest but also brought swift restoration of order. Within days, the vandalised pipelines were repaired and reactivated, averting what could have become a deeper economic crisis.

Beyond economic stability, the President also gained significant political ground in Rivers, a state previously dominated by the opposition. Before the emergency declaration, the Peoples Democratic Party held sway in the state. But as the crisis deepened, some loyalists of the governor defected to the All People’s Party ahead of the October 5, 2024, local government election, which they won.

The rescheduled poll, conducted by the state’s sole administrator on August 30, 2025, further cemented APC’s foothold, as its candidates emerged victorious in 20 out of 23 local government areas.

The outcome not only marked the APC’s long-sought grassroots penetration in Rivers but also positioned the party strongly ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Another clear winner is the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike. Since December 2023, the minister had been locked in a fierce struggle to reclaim political control of Rivers. His loyalists had lost out in key positions—commissioners, local government chairmen, and other strategic offices—leaving him politically stranded.

The Supreme Court judgment that restored the Amaewhule-led Assembly gave Wike fresh leverage to tighten his grip on Governor Fubara. Determined to unseat him, Wike pressed hard until President Tinubu’s emergency rule intervened, halting the showdown. In one of his interviews, Wike even admitted that the President’s intervention had spared Fubara from the “sledgehammer.”

During the political lull that followed, the President reconciled the two rivals for a second time. Since then, Wike has bounced back to political relevance, successfully repositioning his loyalists in local government offices across the state.

In a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, on Wednesday, the FCT minister said the President’s intervention had further restored the confidence of the people of Rivers State in his leadership.

He commended the people of the state for their belief in the President and continuous support for him in his tireless efforts to return the country to the path of progress and development.

Though he lost out politically and was suspended from office for six months, Fubara will also count himself among the winners of the emergency rule. Speaking with a group of supporters who had visited him, the governor had said the declaration of the emergency rule by President Tinubu saved his job and gave him the hope of returning to the Government House.

Armed by the Supreme Court judgment, the Amaewhule-led Assembly was determined to oust Fubara by all means until the declaration of the emergency rule on March 18 by President Tinubu.

Also on the winning side are the members of the Amaewhule-led faction of the Rivers Assembly. Though they were affected by the emergency rule, as the President suspended them from office, they regained their political relevance in their various constituencies and are now certain of electoral values in the 2027 election in the state.

The APC gained massively as well. The party, which was in opposition until the emergency rule, is now holding a major position in the political scheme in the state. Having won 20 out of the 23 local government areas in the August 30 election, the Tony Okocha-led state chapter of the party is now a beautiful bride.

The party is reportedly offering the governor the leadership of the party in the state, a move seen as part of wider political realignments following his reconciliation with Wike.

Elected local government chairmen on the APC platform can also count themselves among the winners of the emergency rule. The political situation created the opening for the opposition party to take control of key positions and sweep the polls—an advantage that strengthens its footing ahead of the 2027 elections.

Another clear winner is the Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd). Pulled out of retirement after serving as Chief of Naval Staff under the late President Muhammadu Buhari, Ibas was entrusted with overseeing Rivers during its most turbulent period. His appointment not only restored stability but also gave him a high-profile platform to demonstrate administrative and crisis-management skills.

See also  BREAKING: Gospel singer Bunmi Akinnanu 'Omije Ojumi' dies

Successfully steering the state through the emergency rule adds a new feather to his cap, bolstering his public profile. Many now believe he may leverage this national exposure as a launchpad for a future political adventure in his home state of Cross River, where his name already commands respect.

Losers

One of the losers of the development in Rivers is the former governor and now chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, Rotimi Amaechi.

The former transport minister during the administration of the late President Muhammadu Buhari had lost political relevance in the state since Wike took over in 2015. He had lost to Wike in the successive elections since then, as his political machine weakened considerably after leaving office. A loss for Wike in the crisis could have provided leverage for Amaechi to reassert his political dominance in the state.

Amaechi was a vocal critic of the emergency rule. He publicly condemned the move, arguing that Tinubu’s actions were unconstitutional, a “brazen power grab,” and a threat to democracy.

For the emergency rule, many of Fubara’s loyalists lost their relevance in the scheme of things in the state. Though some of them may gain political appointments, that may not suffice for the opportunities they lost in the local government election. Some of them were reportedly angry that the governor had subjected himself to the authority of Wike, ruling them out of contention and political relevance.

Another set of losers are some of the political leaders, stakeholders, and statesmen who had cheered Fubara on during the crisis. Among them are a former governor, Celestine Omehia; former national chairman of the PDP, Prince Uche Secondus, and Senator Lee Maeba.

Wike had serially accused both Omehia and Secondus of lacking political strength in the state, and they were visible throughout the crisis. Fubara’s return may, however, lock them out of relevance in the state.

Also on the losing end is the factional speaker, Oko-Jumbo, and his two members. With the authority firmly in control of the Amaewhule faction, Oko-Jumbo and his men would have to realign to retain their membership of the assembly.

Anticipating Fubara’s return

In the meantime, nothing was heard about Fubara’s return as of 8:00 pm on Wednesday. However, one of his aides, who did not want to be named, said the Governor is expected back on Thursday to resume his duties.

“The Governor will be back tomorrow (Thursday),” the aide said in a terse response.

The streets of Port Harcourt, the state capital, have remained eerily calm despite the news of Fubara’s reinstatement. One of our correspondents spotted many residents discussing the development in small groups initially, and thereafter went about their everyday activities. In the Governor’s hometown of Opobo-Nkoro Local Government Area, the situation was no different, as many of the natives were still expecting the Governor’s return.

An indigene of Opobo-Nkoro who simply identified herself as Ibifuro expressed mixed feelings, saying Fubara will no longer wield the influence he is known for.

“I’m happy, but nothing much will change because, as it is now, the Governor’s hands are tied. He can’t do things on his own. He is like an infant now who will wait for instructions,” she stated with disdain.

There are indications that Fubara’s supporters, especially members of the Rivers Women Unite for Sim, are gearing up to welcome the Governor on Thursday. There is also palpable tension in Port Harcourt, as it remains unclear whether the reconciliation between Wike’s supporters and Fubara’s will hold for long.

Stakeholders in Rivers State also shared their views on the developments, with some calling for greater synergy between the executive and legislature.

Elder statesman and convener of the Coalition of Rivers State Leaders of Thought, Sunny Chukumele, said he and the CRSLT were not excited about the news.

In an interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday, Chukumele noted that although the emergency rule has ended, Fubara is no longer in charge as his predecessor, Wike, has successfully captured the State.

“The so-called emergency rule had a timeline, and that timeline seems to have elapsed today. So we are not excited. The coalition of Rivers State and the leaders of thought that I lead are not excited. Rivers people are not excited either.

“You know, we are not excited because I keep maintaining that it is like going back to Egypt. It’s a journey back to Egypt.

“So, House of Assembly, I don’t know what to tell them. I wish them luck. I wish the Governor and the so-called House of Assembly luck. For me and us, it is predictable. It is predictable that the Governor of Rivers State, once so loved, has been lost to the capturers of the state,” he stated.

He expressed worry over the fate of three lawmakers who supported the governor during the political crisis in the state, saying they may be sanctioned by the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule.

A former federal lawmaker and Commissioner for Information and Communications in the State, Ogbonna Nwuke, said he hoped for the return of good governance, saying all projects stalled due to the emergency rule will continue.

Nwuke, who represented Etche-Omuma Federal Constituency in the Red Chamber of the National Assembly, said, “Our expectation is that going forward we will have a united Rivers State on the basis of the best norms of good governance. That all of those projects that made the Fubara government very progressive, months before it was thrown out on suspension, will be revisited quickly.

“All those projects are tied to the future development of Rivers State. Above all, we expect that the legislature and the executive will collaborate and that their collaboration will bring about good governance as well. Above all, the expectations of the Rivers people who have prayed for their return, who have fought for their return, will be satisfied in the days to come.”

For his part, the Chancellor, International for Social Justice Human Rights, Dr Omenazu Jackson, stressed the need for the peace to be sustained, as well as cooperation between the Governor and the legislators. He warned that the office of the Governor must be respected to enable him to concentrate on the task of governance.

Jackson explained, “All hands must be on deck to ensure peace in Rivers State. There should be executive synergy for the development of the State, but nobody should bully the Governor anymore. The Governor should work in consonance with the mandate of the people of the State.

See also  Tinubu revokes pardon for Sanda, 140 high-profile inmates

“Those promises he made to the people during his electioneering campaign, he should keep to them, and all the political gladiators should sheathe their swords. There should be genuine reconciliation, and everybody should maintain their lane.

“There should be no encroachment or interference on the rights of the legislators, and there should be no encroachment on the rights of the Executive Governor of the State. We are not happy with the waste of six months in Rivers State’s democratic experience. Rivers people are not happy about it, and we don’t want to hear such experiences anymore.”

Security details faceoff

Earlier on Wednesday, there was a mild standoff in the Rivers State Government House as some security details attached to the seat of power protested alleged poor welfare and six-month unpaid allowances since the sole Administrator assumed office.

The security aides, mainly operatives of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, claimed that they had served Ibas dutifully since he assumed office, but their welfare had been neglected.

The standoff occurred at about 10:00 am as the security operatives demanded a parting gift from the administrator. They also threatened to hold his convoy as he departed for Port Harcourt Airport.

A viral video spotted by The PUNCH showed the moment when the angry operatives threatened to lock the government house, insisting that the interim administration must appreciate their hard work and dedication.

“For what? They have made billions. We are not doing it again. Imagine for six months we have been suffering, working hard here. We will not agree. We will lock this place and nobody will go out. For what?” one operative screamed. Although an official arrived at the scene to calm the operatives, the outcry continued as the operatives accused the official of being ignorant of their plight.

“Do you know how much has been going out of this place (Government House), and they didn’t give us anything. We will not accept it again. They should give us our own. If it is politicians, they will give, so they should also dash (gift) us,” another detail said bluntly.

Our correspondent gathered that the situation was later brought under control by some senior security officials at the Government House.

Ibas’ convoy later drove off to the airport and departed for Abuja.

When contacted for comments, the media aide to the Administrator, Hector Igbikiowubo, stated that he would issue a statement on the issue. However, he had yet to do so as of press time.

Lawyers demand litigation

Meanwhile, senior legal practitioners insist that the Supreme Court must still hear the constitutional challenge to President Bola Tinubu’s emergency rule in Rivers State, even though the six months have lapsed today.

The Managing Partner and Founder of PLATINUM & TAYLOR HILL, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, called on the Supreme Court to deliver a ruling on the legality of President Bola Tinubu’s emergency declaration in Rivers state, even though the six-month measure expired on Tuesday.

“By reason of the expiration of the six-month duration of the emergency rule declared by Mr President in Rivers State, has the suit become academic?” Ojo asked.

He added, “In law, we must realise that this suit raises fundamental constitutional issues that are of great recondite. The Supreme Court, being a policy court, and for the purpose of this suit, a constitutional court, should seize the opportunity placed before it by that suit to make relevant decisions or pronouncements on the legality or otherwise of the declaration of emergency rule in River State by Mr. President, about six months ago.”

Ojo argued that the case remains “fit for adjudication” because its determination would carry legal and financial consequences for office holders suspended during the emergency.

“Should the Supreme Court decide to nullify the declaration, then it follows that those political office holders who are suspended, during the period of the emergency, where they were not receiving salaries, should be entitled to have it back,” he stated.

He also cited a precedent from 2004, when then-President Olusegun Obasanjo imposed emergency rule in Plateau State and appointed retired Major Chris Ali as the sole Administrator. Although the measure ended in November of that year, the Supreme Court still heard arguments on its validity.

“The Supreme Court was of the opinion that the suit had not become academic just because the emergency rule had come to an end,” Ojo recalled, noting the case was struck out on technical grounds rather than lack of live issues.

Beyond salaries or restitution, Ojo said a decision would “bring legal clarity as to the scope of the powers of the President as far as the declaration of emergency rule is concerned. It will constitute a precedent, a guide for the exercise of the Presidential power as far as the declaration of emergency is concerned.”

He urged lawyers to press ahead with the suit, saying, “I plead with the lawyers to approach the Supreme Court for a date so that the suit can be determined once and for all. It raises constitutional issues. The court and Nigeria should not miss this opportunity.”

PDP National Legal Adviser, Kamaldeen Ajibade (SAN), said the case was deliberately framed to test the Constitution, not to defend Governor Siminalayi Fubara, who was suspended along with other office holders during the emergency.

“We will still wait until we are given a date because that case is not about Fubara; that case is purely about the interpretation of the constitution of Nigeria,” Ajibade told one of our correspondents on Wednesday.

He added, “You know Fubara is not a party, Rivers State was not made a party in that case, so we were very careful when we filed that matter because we know this kind of thing can happen. So they cannot because of the resumption of Fubara now say the matter is spent, No! If they try to raise that, we will be very forceful about it. The case has to be heard because of the future’s sake.”

For his part, Counsel for the Attorney-General of the Federation, Akin Olujinmi (SAN), cited a precedent from Plateau State under former President Olusegun Obasanjo, where an emergency rule declared in 2004 was litigated even after it expired.

“Just as it happened in the case of Joseph Leto when the emergency rule was invoked there in 2004. Even after the period had expired, the Supreme Court still sat on the case. The court, in other words, can still sit on the case. It doesn’t matter that the period of emergency has run out,” Olujinmi said.

Punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

State Police Update: National Assembly collates reports from 30 state assemblies

Published

on

The National Assembly has commenced collation of reports from state Houses of Assembly on the proposed establishment of state police, with the Senate Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, saying the constitutional requirement for the reform had been met.

Bamidele disclosed this on Thursday while delivering a lecture to participants of Senior Executive Course 48 at the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies, Kuru, Plateau State.

He said at least 30 state legislatures had approved the State Police Constitution Alteration Bill, 2026, surpassing the constitutional requirement of two-thirds of the 36 State Houses of Assembly.

According to him, the National Assembly will collate the reports, consider the positions of the state legislatures and pass a resolution by a simple majority in both chambers before transmitting the bill to President Bola Tinubu for assent.

The Senate Leader, who is also Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Review of the 1999 Constitution, said the National Assembly intended to complete the remaining legislative processes by December 2026.

He said, “We are pleased to inform our constituents across the federation that state police has moved from rhetoric to reality. We have already received formal reports from the state Houses of Assembly and, as of today, no fewer than 30 states have approved the State Police Constitution Alteration Bill, 2026.

“By the provision of Section 9(2) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which requires the concurrence of not less than two-thirds of all state Houses of Assembly, the constitutional requirement for the alteration has been duly met. This is a historic milestone in our collective quest to re-engineer our security architecture and make it more responsive, more local, and more effective.

See also  Two killed in Lagos-Ibadan Expressway crash

“What happens next is procedural, but critical. The National Assembly is now constitutionally obligated to consider the reports transmitted by the state Houses of Assembly, collate those reports, and pass a resolution by simple majority of members in both chambers. Once this resolution is passed, the Alteration Bill will be transmitted to the President and Commander-in-Chief for assent.

“We have set a clear timeline for ourselves. We intend to conclude all these legislative stages — consideration of reports, passage of resolution, and transmission for presidential assent — on or before December 2026,” the Senate Leader emphasised.

The proposed state police system is part of wider efforts to decentralise Nigeria’s security architecture amid persistent killings, kidnappings and other violent crimes across the country.

Under the existing policing structure, the Nigeria Police Force operates primarily as a centrally administered institution.

Proponents of state police argue that allowing states to establish their own police services would improve local intelligence gathering, response times and accountability.

However, concerns have been raised about the potential abuse of state police by governors and other political office holders, particularly against political opponents.

Bamidele said the proposed reform would operate within constitutional safeguards, oversight mechanisms and human rights protections.

He described the development as a significant breakthrough after more than 15 years of unsuccessful attempts to establish state police through constitutional reform.

“What this means is that state police is no longer a campaign promise or a subject of endless debate. It is now a constitutional reality. It means that the security of lives, private property and public assets occupies a prime place in the legislative agenda of the 10th National Assembly,” he said.

Bamidele said the proposed system would enable states to develop policing structures better suited to their local conditions.

See also  Plateau killings: Tinubu visits Jos, IG deploys mobile police

He added that the reform was not intended to weaken the Federal Government but to strengthen Nigeria’s federal system by making security more responsive to local communities.

According to him, the objective was not to create state armies but state-led, community-anchored policing arrangements operating under clearly defined constitutional and operational standards.

The Ekiti lawmaker also credited the leadership of the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, with supporting the reform, assuring Nigerians that the National Assembly would see the process through.

He said the National Assembly, under the leadership of Akpabio, “remains committed to delivering on the establishment of state police. We will not falter until every Nigerian, whether in Kuru, in Iyin-Ekiti, in Gusau or in Yenagoa, can sleep with both eyes closed.”

Beyond state police, Bamidele said the 10th National Assembly had prioritised legislation intended to address citizens’ welfare, economic development and institutional reforms.

He argued that the performance of the legislature should be assessed by the practical effects of its laws and interventions rather than the number of bills passed.

Bamidele listed the Student Loans (Access to Higher Education) Act, 2024; the Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act, 2024; the four Tax Reform Acts of 2025; and the National Social Investment Programme Act among the measures passed by the current Assembly.

The Senate Leader also cited the Electoral Act, 2026, the Cybercrimes (Amendment) Act, the Investments and Securities Act, 2025, the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2024, and the Regional Development Commissions Acts.

He said the laws reflected a deliberate effort to use legislation to anticipate emerging challenges, strengthen public institutions and improve governance.

See also  Court freezes four bank accounts linked to Mele Kyari

Bamidele said the impact of proactive lawmaking extended to national security, economic transformation, public financial management, electoral credibility, education, healthcare, technological innovation, environmental sustainability and relations among the different tiers of government.

On the relationship between the National Assembly and NIPSS, he called for stronger institutional collaboration to improve legislative foresight and policy development.

He maintained that the passage of laws alone was insufficient to guarantee good governance, stressing the need for effective implementation, funding and monitoring.

The senator said good laws must be relevant to citizens’ needs and capable of producing measurable improvements in their lives.

He, thus, observed that good governance “requires good laws. But good laws alone do not guarantee good governance.

“We require laws that are relevant, evidence-based, implementable, adequately funded, properly administered, effectively monitored, periodically reviewed and ultimately measured by their impact on citizens,” Bamidele stated.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

FG pumps N5tn into military operations, read details

Published

on

The Federal Government has disbursed N5.15tn in special intervention funds to the Nigerian military and related security agencies between November 2023 and September 2026, amid persistent insecurity, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping and other violent crimes across the country.

An analysis by The PUNCH of documents from the Federation Account Allocation Committee, obtained on Thursday, revealed that the government received N5.65tn into a dedicated special intervention account over the period, out of which N5.15tn had been disbursed, representing 91.15 per cent of the total funds.

The records showed that the intervention was financed through allocations from the Federation Account and other government revenue sources, including non-oil revenue and funds transferred from a FAAC withholding account.

The document, titled ‘Ledger of Special Intervention Programme for Nigerian Military September, 2026”, was prepared by the Federation Account Department of the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation and formed part of the records presented to the Technical Sub-Committee of FAAC at its meeting in Abuja on October 14, 2026.

According to the ledger, the N5.15tn was released through 30 payment transactions between November 8, 2023, and September 23, 2026, while the total receipts were recorded across 33 funding transactions.

The disbursements were separate from the regular annual budgetary allocations to the Ministry of Defence and other security institutions, indicating the scale of additional financial resources channelled towards security operations.

However, the records did not provide a breakdown of the specific military operations, equipment purchases, personnel costs or security projects financed with the money.

A breakdown of the transactions showed that the intervention programme commenced with a N100bn transfer on October 19, 2023, described as the September 2023 allocation.

The first payment of N100bn was made to the military on November 8, 2023, while another N100bn was received on November 20, 2023, and subsequently disbursed on December 20.

By the end of December 2023, the account had received N300bn and disbursed N300bn, leaving no outstanding balance.

The funding arrangement continued throughout 2024, with regular transfers of N100bn and corresponding payments to military and paramilitary agencies.

Between January and December 2024, the account received N1.2tn and disbursed the same amount, bringing cumulative receipts and payments to N1.5tn.

See also  Okpebholo condemns Edo kidnapping, orders police prob

The transactions were largely recorded as monthly allocations under the special intervention programme, although the payment dates did not always correspond with the months for which the funds were allocated.

For instance, the January 2024 allocation was transferred on February 27, while the corresponding payment was made on March 1.

Similarly, the ledger showed that the programme entered a second phase in July 2024, beginning with a N100bn transfer on July 27.

The second phase continued into 2025, with the government maintaining the N100bn monthly funding pattern.

During the first nine months of 2025, the account received N900bn and disbursed N900bn, bringing cumulative payments to N2.4tn by September 1, 2025.

An analysis of the transactions, therefore, showed that N2.4tn was disbursed between November 2023 and September 2025, before the government significantly increased the scale of the intervention in 2026.

The records indicated that the funding arrangement changed considerably in 2026, with individual transfers rising from the previous N100bn monthly pattern to between N200bn and N500bn.

On March 18, 2026, the government transferred N200bn from the FAAC Withheld Account, described in the ledger as savings for March 2026.

The amount was followed by a N100bn payment to security agencies on March 16, although the payment preceded the recorded transfer by two days.

Another N250bn was transferred from non-oil revenue on May 18, 2026, while N130bn was paid to security agencies from the FAAC Withheld Account on May 25.

The ledger also recorded a N120bn payment to the Consolidated Pool Account II TSA on June 3, 2026.

This particular transaction differed from the other payments because it was not expressly described as a transfer to military or paramilitary agencies.

On June 16, 2026, the government transferred N400bn from non-oil revenue for May, which was reversed the same day.

The reversal was followed by a fresh transfer of N500bn from non-oil revenue, indicating that the earlier transaction was cancelled and replaced.

The same day, N500bn was paid to military and paramilitary agencies, marking one of the largest individual disbursements recorded under the programme.

See also  Plateau killings: Tinubu visits Jos, IG deploys mobile police

Another N500bn was transferred from non-oil revenue on July 15, followed by a corresponding payment to military and paramilitary agencies on July 22.

The pattern continued in August, when N500bn was transferred on August 19 and paid out on the same date.

On September 16, another N500bn was transferred from non-oil revenue, while the corresponding payment was recorded on September 23.

The final entry in the ledger showed a further N500bn transfer from non-oil revenue on October 14, 2026, described as the September 2026 allocation.

Although the ledger was titled September 2026, the inclusion of the October 14 transaction indicated that its financial position incorporated the latest transfer recorded at the FAAC technical meeting.

The figures showed that the intervention account received N3.25tn in 2026 up to October 14, compared with N1.2tn throughout 2024.

This represented an increase of about 170.83 per cent over the entire amount received in 2024, despite the 2026 records covering only part of the year.

Payments recorded in 2026 amounted to N2.75tn, compared with N1.2tn in 2024, representing an increase of approximately 129.17 per cent.

The N2.75tn disbursed in 2026 also accounted for 53.40 per cent of the N5.15tn paid out under the programme since its commencement.

The analysis further showed that the government disbursed more under the special intervention programme in 2026 than the combined N2.4tn released between November 2023 and September 2025.

It also revealed that the programme had an outstanding balance of N500bn as of October 14, 2026, representing 8.85 per cent of the total N5.65tn received.

The balance arose after the latest N500bn transfer was recorded without a corresponding payment in the ledger.

Consequently, the outstanding amount represented funds available in the intervention account rather than money already disbursed to security agencies.

Despite the significant increase in funding, the country continues to grapple with security challenges across several regions.

In the North-East, the military has continued operations against Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province, while banditry and mass kidnappings remain major security concerns in parts of the North-West and North-Central regions.

Communities in several states have also experienced attacks by armed groups, resulting in deaths, displacement and disruption of farming and other economic activities.

See also  Tinubu hails Nigerian global English champions

The security challenges have placed pressure on government finances, as authorities continue to allocate substantial resources to military operations, intelligence gathering, logistics and the protection of vulnerable communities.

FG reviews strategy

Ina related development, the Federal Government has begun a review of the 2019 National Security Strategy to develop a new framework that addresses emerging threats, including terrorism, banditry, kidnapping, cybercrime, food insecurity and climate change.

The National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, disclosed this on Thursday during the inauguration of a committee to review the existing strategy and formulate the National Security Strategy 2026.

Ribadu, who was represented by Major General Sarkin Bello (retd.), said Nigeria’s security environment had changed significantly since the last review in 2019, requiring a comprehensive reassessment of the country’s security priorities.

“Our national security landscape is undergoing rapid and profound transformations. Since the last review of our strategy in 2019, the domestic, regional and global security environments have changed dramatically, with intensity,” he said.

He noted that the country was confronted with multiple security challenges that required a broader strategic response.

“As you are aware, these problems range from terrorism, banditry and kidnapping to sophisticated cyber threats, misinformation, economic problems, food insecurity and environmental challenges, among others,” Ribadu said.

He said the new strategy would serve as a framework for coordinating national security, resilience and sustainable development, adding that it must reflect current realities while anticipating future threats.

Also, the Deputy Chairman of the committee, Major General Evi Onumajuru (retd.), said the changing nature of security threats made a strategic realignment imperative.

He said traditional security challenges, including terrorism, insurgency and banditry, had become intertwined with non-kinetic threats such as cybercrime, economic vulnerabilities, food insecurity and climate change.

He added that the strategy must integrate the priorities of the Renewed Hope Agenda by linking economic prosperity and good governance with human security and national defence.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

10 things to know about applying for 2027 SAN rank

Published

on

The Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee has invited applications for the 2027 award of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria, with private legal practitioners required to pay a non-refundable processing fee of N5m and government-employed lawyers N2.5m.

The committee said the application portal would open on November 1, 2026, directing all candidates to complete the application process online and comply with its document submission requirements and deadlines.

PUNCH Online had reported Wednesday that Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee invited applications for the 2027 conferment of the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

Here are 10 things prospective applicants need to know about the exercise.

1. Applications open on November 11

The LPPC said its application portal would open to the public at 12am on November 1, 2026.

Applications are to be processed through its official portal, www.lppconline.com.

2. Private legal practitioners will pay N5m

The committee fixed the non-refundable processing fee for private legal practitioners at N5m.

3. Government-employed lawyers will pay N2.5m

Legal practitioners employed by the government are required to pay a non-refundable fee of N2.5m.

4. Payment must be made into designated bank accounts

Applicants are required to pay directly into either of the committee’s designated accounts:

– Zenith Bank: 1014103141

– Guaranty Trust Bank: 0213662834

5. Proof of payment must be uploaded

Candidates must upload evidence of payment to the online portal for verification.

According to the notice, the LPPC Secretariat will send a confirmation email after verification, allowing applicants to continue with the process.

See also  Tinubu hails Nigerian global English champions

6. All supporting documents must be uploaded online

Applicants seeking the rank through advocacy or academia must upload clear and legible scanned copies of all mandatory and supporting documents through the portal.

7. Academic applicants have additional requirements

Candidates applying through the academic category must submit seven physical photocopies each of their curriculum vitae and impact statement, in addition to the required flash drives.

8. Every applicant must submit five flash drives

The committee directed all applicants to provide five flash drives containing copies of their completed application forms downloaded from the portal and all mandatory and supporting documents uploaded during the application process.

9. Online applications close on January 31, 2027

The deadline for completing online applications is midnight on January 31, 2027. Applicants are advised to complete their submissions before the deadline to avoid technical or procedural complications.

10. Flash drives must arrive by February 1, 2027

The five flash drives must be delivered to the LPPC Secretariat before 4pm on February 1, 2027.

The committee warned that applications that do not comply with its guidelines or are submitted after the prescribed deadlines will be rejected and treated as non-submissions.

The notice was signed by the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court of Nigeria and Secretary of the LPPC, Kabir Eniola Akanbi.

Applicants seeking clarification may contact the secretariat through lppcsecretariat@courts.gov.ng.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending