Connect with us

News

Tinubu reinstates Fubara after Emergency Rule

Published

on

Siminalayi Fubara will today resume duties as Governor of Rivers State, following the end of the six-month emergency rule imposed on the state by President Bola Tinubu.

The President, on Wednesday, announced an end to the emergency rule he declared in Rivers State on March 18, 2025.

In a statement on the cessation of the emergency rule, made available by the Presidency, the President said, “The Governor, His Excellency Siminalayi Fubara, the deputy governor, Her Excellency Ngozi Odu, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly and the speaker, Martins Amaewhule, will resume work in their offices from September 18, 2025…

“It, therefore, gives me great pleasure to declare that the emergency in Rivers State of Nigeria shall end with effect from midnight today.”

He added, “I am happy today that, from the intelligence available to me, there is a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding, a robust readiness, and potent enthusiasm on the part of all the stakeholders in Rivers State for an immediate return to democratic governance.

“This is undoubtedly a welcome development for me and a remarkable achievement for us. I, therefore, do not see why the state of emergency should exist a day longer than the six months I had pronounced at the beginning of it.”

To restore democracy, which he suspended by appointing Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas as Sole Administrator, the President asked all elected officials to resume their offices effective from midnight of September 18.

The political crisis in Rivers State has been one of Nigeria’s fiercest power struggles in recent years, rooted in a battle between Fubara and his predecessor-turned-political godfather, Nyesom Wike, now Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

When Fubara emerged as governor in May 2023, he was widely seen as Wike’s protégé. The relationship, however, turned sour over control of political structures, state resources, and loyalty ahead of the 2027 elections.

By late 2023, the crisis escalated as the state House of Assembly split, with the majority siding with Wike, while a minority remained loyal to Fubara.

Moves to impeach the governor triggered street protests, legal battles, and even violence as the Assembly building was set ablaze during the height of tensions, symbolising the depth of the political breakdown.

President Tinubu brokered a peace deal in December 2023, compelling Fubara to recognise the Amaewhule-led lawmakers who had declared their defection to the All Progressives Congress. The Abuja controversial agreement was criticised by many gladiators, describing it as unconstitutional.

Despite the truce, parallel legislative sessions, disputed budgets, and allegations of intimidation persisted. Both camps entrenched themselves further, drawing in national political forces and destabilising governance in the oil-rich state.

The height of the tensions was the February 28, 2025, judgment of the Supreme Court, which recognised the Amaewhule-led Assembly as the authentic in the state.

Hitherto, Fubara had recognised and given validity to the Victor Oko-Jumbo-led assembly.

The apex court also ordered the embattled governor to re-present the 2024 budget, while halting the release of funds by the Federal Government to the state.

It also declared the controversial local government election conducted by Fubara on October 5, 2024, as invalid and sacked the elected council chairmen.

The battle line was then drawn between Fubara and the Amaewhule-led Assembly, leading to heightened tension in the state.

The assembly, playing hide-and-seek, asked the governor to present the 2024 budget, even after the 2025 budget had been passed by the Oko-Jumbo three-man faction, though attempts by the governor to meet with the members failed.

As the tempers rose, locals and ex-agitators threatened to tamper with oil installations should Fubara be impeached, as threatened by the Amaewhule-led assembly in a notice sent to the governor.

A day before Tinubu imposed emergency rule, an explosion rocked a section of the Trans Niger Pipeline in the Bodo Community of Gonna Local Government Area in Rivers State. The following day, another explosion severed a pipeline manifold in the Omwawriwa axis of Ogba-Egbema-Ndoni Local Government Area of the State.

The President expressed concern over vandalism by militants, allegedly acting in support of Fubara. The attacks occurred amid desperate efforts by the Tinubu administration to increase Nigeria’s lagging crude oil output and curb leaks.

To forestall a breakdown of law and order and protect vital oil installations essential to uninterrupted production and the economy, President Tinubu, on March 18, 2025, declared a state of emergency in Rivers State and suspended all democratic institutions.

The declaration was faulted by civil society groups, opposition political parties, Rivers indigenes, especially women, but the President justified his intervention, saying he was constitutionally empowered to  intervene to prevent breakdown of law and order.

In his Wednesday statement, Tinubu said, “You will recall that on March 18, 2025, I proclaimed a state of emergency in the State. The summary of it for context is that there was a total paralysis of governance in Rivers State, which had led to the Governor of Rivers State and the House of Assembly being unable to work together.”

He cited vandalism of “critical economic assets of the State, including oil pipelines,” and a split legislature in which “four members worked with the Governor, while 27 members opposed the Governor…As a result, the Governor could not present any Appropriation Bill to the House, to enable him to access funds to run Rivers State’s affairs.”

Tinubu said attempts by himself and “other well-meaning Nigerians” to broker peace failed, prompting him “to invoke the powers conferred on me by Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, to proclaim the state of emergency.”

He noted that “the offices of the Governor, Deputy Governor, and elected members of the State House of Assembly were suspended for six months in the first instance. The six months expire today, September 17, 2025.”

Thanking lawmakers for approving the proclamation, Tinubu added: “I thank the National Assembly, which, after critically evaluating the justification for the proclamation, took steps immediately, as required by the Constitution, to approve the declaration in the interest of peace and order in Rivers State. I also thank our traditional rulers and the good people of Rivers State for their support from the date of the declaration of the State of emergency until now.”

He acknowledged some legal challenges, saying, “I am not unaware that there were a few voices of dissent against the proclamation, which led to their instituting over 40 cases in the courts in Abuja, Port Harcourt, and Yenagoa, to invalidate the declaration…But what needs to be said is that the power to declare a state of emergency is an inbuilt constitutional tool to address situations of actual or threatened breakdown of public order and public safety, which require extraordinary measures to return the State to peace, order and security.”

See also  Ramaphosa slams xenophobic violence, vows illegal immigrants arrest

Referencing court proceedings, the President said, “Considering objectively, we had reached that situation of total breakdown of public order and public safety in Rivers State, as shown in the judgment of the Supreme Court on the disputes between the Executive and the Legislative arm of Rivers State. It would have been a colossal failure on my part as President not to have made that proclamation.”

Tinubu urged cooperation between branches of government, advising, “As a stakeholder in democratic governance, I believe that the need for a harmonious existence and relationship between the executive and the legislature is key to a successful government, whether at the state or national level.

“However, that expectation will remain unrealisable in an atmosphere of violence, anarchy, and insecurity borne by misguided political activism and Machiavellian manipulations among the stakeholders.”

The President acknowledged that the conditions had improved after reconciliation between rival factions, which he described as “a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding.”

“I am happy today that, from the intelligence available to me, there is a groundswell of a new spirit of understanding, a robust readiness, and potent enthusiasm on the part of all the stakeholders in Rivers State for an immediate return to democratic governance.

“I therefore do not see why the State of emergency should exist a day longer than the six months I had pronounced at the beginning of it. It therefore gives me great pleasure to declare that the emergency in Rivers State of Nigeria shall end with effect from midnight today.

“I take this opportunity to remind the Governors and the Houses of Assembly of all the States of our country to continue to appreciate that it is only in an atmosphere of peace, order, and good government that we can deliver the dividends of democracy to our people. I implore all of you to let this realisation drive your actions at all times.”

Winners

President Tinubu emerges as the ultimate winner. Justifying his intervention in a statement on Wednesday, the President declared: “It would have been a colossal failure on my part as President not to have made that proclamation.”

For an administration striving to revive the economy from a comatose state, Tinubu was unwilling to risk anything that could cripple its mainstay—oil. His greatest concern was that critical national assets in Rivers, particularly oil pipelines, had come under repeated vandalism amid the heightened political tension.

The emergency declaration not only quelled the unrest but also brought swift restoration of order. Within days, the vandalised pipelines were repaired and reactivated, averting what could have become a deeper economic crisis.

Beyond economic stability, the President also gained significant political ground in Rivers, a state previously dominated by the opposition. Before the emergency declaration, the Peoples Democratic Party held sway in the state. But as the crisis deepened, some loyalists of the governor defected to the All People’s Party ahead of the October 5, 2024, local government election, which they won.

The rescheduled poll, conducted by the state’s sole administrator on August 30, 2025, further cemented APC’s foothold, as its candidates emerged victorious in 20 out of 23 local government areas.

The outcome not only marked the APC’s long-sought grassroots penetration in Rivers but also positioned the party strongly ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Another clear winner is the FCT Minister, Nyesom Wike. Since December 2023, the minister had been locked in a fierce struggle to reclaim political control of Rivers. His loyalists had lost out in key positions—commissioners, local government chairmen, and other strategic offices—leaving him politically stranded.

The Supreme Court judgment that restored the Amaewhule-led Assembly gave Wike fresh leverage to tighten his grip on Governor Fubara. Determined to unseat him, Wike pressed hard until President Tinubu’s emergency rule intervened, halting the showdown. In one of his interviews, Wike even admitted that the President’s intervention had spared Fubara from the “sledgehammer.”

During the political lull that followed, the President reconciled the two rivals for a second time. Since then, Wike has bounced back to political relevance, successfully repositioning his loyalists in local government offices across the state.

In a statement by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media, Lere Olayinka, on Wednesday, the FCT minister said the President’s intervention had further restored the confidence of the people of Rivers State in his leadership.

He commended the people of the state for their belief in the President and continuous support for him in his tireless efforts to return the country to the path of progress and development.

Though he lost out politically and was suspended from office for six months, Fubara will also count himself among the winners of the emergency rule. Speaking with a group of supporters who had visited him, the governor had said the declaration of the emergency rule by President Tinubu saved his job and gave him the hope of returning to the Government House.

Armed by the Supreme Court judgment, the Amaewhule-led Assembly was determined to oust Fubara by all means until the declaration of the emergency rule on March 18 by President Tinubu.

Also on the winning side are the members of the Amaewhule-led faction of the Rivers Assembly. Though they were affected by the emergency rule, as the President suspended them from office, they regained their political relevance in their various constituencies and are now certain of electoral values in the 2027 election in the state.

The APC gained massively as well. The party, which was in opposition until the emergency rule, is now holding a major position in the political scheme in the state. Having won 20 out of the 23 local government areas in the August 30 election, the Tony Okocha-led state chapter of the party is now a beautiful bride.

The party is reportedly offering the governor the leadership of the party in the state, a move seen as part of wider political realignments following his reconciliation with Wike.

Elected local government chairmen on the APC platform can also count themselves among the winners of the emergency rule. The political situation created the opening for the opposition party to take control of key positions and sweep the polls—an advantage that strengthens its footing ahead of the 2027 elections.

Another clear winner is the Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd). Pulled out of retirement after serving as Chief of Naval Staff under the late President Muhammadu Buhari, Ibas was entrusted with overseeing Rivers during its most turbulent period. His appointment not only restored stability but also gave him a high-profile platform to demonstrate administrative and crisis-management skills.

See also  India, others reject Tinubu’s envoys, see why

Successfully steering the state through the emergency rule adds a new feather to his cap, bolstering his public profile. Many now believe he may leverage this national exposure as a launchpad for a future political adventure in his home state of Cross River, where his name already commands respect.

Losers

One of the losers of the development in Rivers is the former governor and now chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, Rotimi Amaechi.

The former transport minister during the administration of the late President Muhammadu Buhari had lost political relevance in the state since Wike took over in 2015. He had lost to Wike in the successive elections since then, as his political machine weakened considerably after leaving office. A loss for Wike in the crisis could have provided leverage for Amaechi to reassert his political dominance in the state.

Amaechi was a vocal critic of the emergency rule. He publicly condemned the move, arguing that Tinubu’s actions were unconstitutional, a “brazen power grab,” and a threat to democracy.

For the emergency rule, many of Fubara’s loyalists lost their relevance in the scheme of things in the state. Though some of them may gain political appointments, that may not suffice for the opportunities they lost in the local government election. Some of them were reportedly angry that the governor had subjected himself to the authority of Wike, ruling them out of contention and political relevance.

Another set of losers are some of the political leaders, stakeholders, and statesmen who had cheered Fubara on during the crisis. Among them are a former governor, Celestine Omehia; former national chairman of the PDP, Prince Uche Secondus, and Senator Lee Maeba.

Wike had serially accused both Omehia and Secondus of lacking political strength in the state, and they were visible throughout the crisis. Fubara’s return may, however, lock them out of relevance in the state.

Also on the losing end is the factional speaker, Oko-Jumbo, and his two members. With the authority firmly in control of the Amaewhule faction, Oko-Jumbo and his men would have to realign to retain their membership of the assembly.

Anticipating Fubara’s return

In the meantime, nothing was heard about Fubara’s return as of 8:00 pm on Wednesday. However, one of his aides, who did not want to be named, said the Governor is expected back on Thursday to resume his duties.

“The Governor will be back tomorrow (Thursday),” the aide said in a terse response.

The streets of Port Harcourt, the state capital, have remained eerily calm despite the news of Fubara’s reinstatement. One of our correspondents spotted many residents discussing the development in small groups initially, and thereafter went about their everyday activities. In the Governor’s hometown of Opobo-Nkoro Local Government Area, the situation was no different, as many of the natives were still expecting the Governor’s return.

An indigene of Opobo-Nkoro who simply identified herself as Ibifuro expressed mixed feelings, saying Fubara will no longer wield the influence he is known for.

“I’m happy, but nothing much will change because, as it is now, the Governor’s hands are tied. He can’t do things on his own. He is like an infant now who will wait for instructions,” she stated with disdain.

There are indications that Fubara’s supporters, especially members of the Rivers Women Unite for Sim, are gearing up to welcome the Governor on Thursday. There is also palpable tension in Port Harcourt, as it remains unclear whether the reconciliation between Wike’s supporters and Fubara’s will hold for long.

Stakeholders in Rivers State also shared their views on the developments, with some calling for greater synergy between the executive and legislature.

Elder statesman and convener of the Coalition of Rivers State Leaders of Thought, Sunny Chukumele, said he and the CRSLT were not excited about the news.

In an interview with The PUNCH on Wednesday, Chukumele noted that although the emergency rule has ended, Fubara is no longer in charge as his predecessor, Wike, has successfully captured the State.

“The so-called emergency rule had a timeline, and that timeline seems to have elapsed today. So we are not excited. The coalition of Rivers State and the leaders of thought that I lead are not excited. Rivers people are not excited either.

“You know, we are not excited because I keep maintaining that it is like going back to Egypt. It’s a journey back to Egypt.

“So, House of Assembly, I don’t know what to tell them. I wish them luck. I wish the Governor and the so-called House of Assembly luck. For me and us, it is predictable. It is predictable that the Governor of Rivers State, once so loved, has been lost to the capturers of the state,” he stated.

He expressed worry over the fate of three lawmakers who supported the governor during the political crisis in the state, saying they may be sanctioned by the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule.

A former federal lawmaker and Commissioner for Information and Communications in the State, Ogbonna Nwuke, said he hoped for the return of good governance, saying all projects stalled due to the emergency rule will continue.

Nwuke, who represented Etche-Omuma Federal Constituency in the Red Chamber of the National Assembly, said, “Our expectation is that going forward we will have a united Rivers State on the basis of the best norms of good governance. That all of those projects that made the Fubara government very progressive, months before it was thrown out on suspension, will be revisited quickly.

“All those projects are tied to the future development of Rivers State. Above all, we expect that the legislature and the executive will collaborate and that their collaboration will bring about good governance as well. Above all, the expectations of the Rivers people who have prayed for their return, who have fought for their return, will be satisfied in the days to come.”

For his part, the Chancellor, International for Social Justice Human Rights, Dr Omenazu Jackson, stressed the need for the peace to be sustained, as well as cooperation between the Governor and the legislators. He warned that the office of the Governor must be respected to enable him to concentrate on the task of governance.

Jackson explained, “All hands must be on deck to ensure peace in Rivers State. There should be executive synergy for the development of the State, but nobody should bully the Governor anymore. The Governor should work in consonance with the mandate of the people of the State.

See also  PHOTOS: Fisherman shows off stingray caught in Bayelsa community

“Those promises he made to the people during his electioneering campaign, he should keep to them, and all the political gladiators should sheathe their swords. There should be genuine reconciliation, and everybody should maintain their lane.

“There should be no encroachment or interference on the rights of the legislators, and there should be no encroachment on the rights of the Executive Governor of the State. We are not happy with the waste of six months in Rivers State’s democratic experience. Rivers people are not happy about it, and we don’t want to hear such experiences anymore.”

Security details faceoff

Earlier on Wednesday, there was a mild standoff in the Rivers State Government House as some security details attached to the seat of power protested alleged poor welfare and six-month unpaid allowances since the sole Administrator assumed office.

The security aides, mainly operatives of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, claimed that they had served Ibas dutifully since he assumed office, but their welfare had been neglected.

The standoff occurred at about 10:00 am as the security operatives demanded a parting gift from the administrator. They also threatened to hold his convoy as he departed for Port Harcourt Airport.

A viral video spotted by The PUNCH showed the moment when the angry operatives threatened to lock the government house, insisting that the interim administration must appreciate their hard work and dedication.

“For what? They have made billions. We are not doing it again. Imagine for six months we have been suffering, working hard here. We will not agree. We will lock this place and nobody will go out. For what?” one operative screamed. Although an official arrived at the scene to calm the operatives, the outcry continued as the operatives accused the official of being ignorant of their plight.

“Do you know how much has been going out of this place (Government House), and they didn’t give us anything. We will not accept it again. They should give us our own. If it is politicians, they will give, so they should also dash (gift) us,” another detail said bluntly.

Our correspondent gathered that the situation was later brought under control by some senior security officials at the Government House.

Ibas’ convoy later drove off to the airport and departed for Abuja.

When contacted for comments, the media aide to the Administrator, Hector Igbikiowubo, stated that he would issue a statement on the issue. However, he had yet to do so as of press time.

Lawyers demand litigation

Meanwhile, senior legal practitioners insist that the Supreme Court must still hear the constitutional challenge to President Bola Tinubu’s emergency rule in Rivers State, even though the six months have lapsed today.

The Managing Partner and Founder of PLATINUM & TAYLOR HILL, Olalekan Ojo, SAN, called on the Supreme Court to deliver a ruling on the legality of President Bola Tinubu’s emergency declaration in Rivers state, even though the six-month measure expired on Tuesday.

“By reason of the expiration of the six-month duration of the emergency rule declared by Mr President in Rivers State, has the suit become academic?” Ojo asked.

He added, “In law, we must realise that this suit raises fundamental constitutional issues that are of great recondite. The Supreme Court, being a policy court, and for the purpose of this suit, a constitutional court, should seize the opportunity placed before it by that suit to make relevant decisions or pronouncements on the legality or otherwise of the declaration of emergency rule in River State by Mr. President, about six months ago.”

Ojo argued that the case remains “fit for adjudication” because its determination would carry legal and financial consequences for office holders suspended during the emergency.

“Should the Supreme Court decide to nullify the declaration, then it follows that those political office holders who are suspended, during the period of the emergency, where they were not receiving salaries, should be entitled to have it back,” he stated.

He also cited a precedent from 2004, when then-President Olusegun Obasanjo imposed emergency rule in Plateau State and appointed retired Major Chris Ali as the sole Administrator. Although the measure ended in November of that year, the Supreme Court still heard arguments on its validity.

“The Supreme Court was of the opinion that the suit had not become academic just because the emergency rule had come to an end,” Ojo recalled, noting the case was struck out on technical grounds rather than lack of live issues.

Beyond salaries or restitution, Ojo said a decision would “bring legal clarity as to the scope of the powers of the President as far as the declaration of emergency rule is concerned. It will constitute a precedent, a guide for the exercise of the Presidential power as far as the declaration of emergency is concerned.”

He urged lawyers to press ahead with the suit, saying, “I plead with the lawyers to approach the Supreme Court for a date so that the suit can be determined once and for all. It raises constitutional issues. The court and Nigeria should not miss this opportunity.”

PDP National Legal Adviser, Kamaldeen Ajibade (SAN), said the case was deliberately framed to test the Constitution, not to defend Governor Siminalayi Fubara, who was suspended along with other office holders during the emergency.

“We will still wait until we are given a date because that case is not about Fubara; that case is purely about the interpretation of the constitution of Nigeria,” Ajibade told one of our correspondents on Wednesday.

He added, “You know Fubara is not a party, Rivers State was not made a party in that case, so we were very careful when we filed that matter because we know this kind of thing can happen. So they cannot because of the resumption of Fubara now say the matter is spent, No! If they try to raise that, we will be very forceful about it. The case has to be heard because of the future’s sake.”

For his part, Counsel for the Attorney-General of the Federation, Akin Olujinmi (SAN), cited a precedent from Plateau State under former President Olusegun Obasanjo, where an emergency rule declared in 2004 was litigated even after it expired.

“Just as it happened in the case of Joseph Leto when the emergency rule was invoked there in 2004. Even after the period had expired, the Supreme Court still sat on the case. The court, in other words, can still sit on the case. It doesn’t matter that the period of emergency has run out,” Olujinmi said.

Punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  Senate moves to fast-track police exit from PenCom

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  India, others reject Tinubu’s envoys, see why

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  Ramaphosa slams xenophobic violence, vows illegal immigrants arrest

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  Microsoft ends Windows 10 updates, leaving millions facing tough choices

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  Alleged killing of Christians: Onanuga warns Senator Cruz as US lawmakers move to sanction Nigerian politicians

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  Akpabio, Yilwatda challenge Nigerians to monitor governors on hardship

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending