Connect with us

News

Insecurity: Nigeria bleeding, confused, minority reps lament

Published

on

The minority caucus of the House of Representatives on Wednesday delivered a scathing assessment of the state of the nation, accusing the government of President Bola Tinubu of failing to tackle worsening insecurity, deepening economic hardship and mounting threats to democratic institutions.

The opposition lawmakers also alleged that the administration was focusing on political calculations ahead of the 2027 general elections rather than addressing the pressing challenges facing Nigerians.

Addressing journalists at the National Assembly Complex in Abuja, Minority Leader of the House, Mr Fred Agbedi, said the country was facing one of its most difficult periods since the return to democratic rule in 1999, citing persistent insecurity, rising poverty and growing public frustration.

“Nigeria is bleeding, Nigeria is confused and Nigeria is being deliberately pushed to the brink by a government that has elevated 2027 electioneering above the lives and welfare of citizens,” Agbedi declared.

He said the caucus convened the press conference “with a heavy heart but with unshaken resolve to speak truth to power,” stressing that remaining silent amid the country’s challenges would amount to complicity.

The opposition lawmakers argued that three years into the Tinubu administration, Nigerians were yet to see significant improvements in security and economic conditions despite repeated assurances from government officials.

A major focus of the briefing was the recent death of retired Maj Gen Rabe Abubakar, who was reportedly abducted alongside his wife in Katsina State before dying in captivity.

The lawmakers described the incident as a tragic reflection of the deteriorating security situation across the country and called for a transparent investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death.

“That a General of the Nigerian Army, who once commanded troops and defended this nation, could be kidnapped alongside his wife and later declared dead under unclear circumstances is a grave indictment of a failed state. It is a national embarrassment,” Agbedi added.

The caucus noted that the killing came amid a wave of attacks by bandits, terrorists and criminal gangs across several parts of the country, including the North-West, North-Central and parts of the South-East.

See also  S’Africa restores power at Nigerian High Commission after debt payment

The lawmakers recalled that security personnel, traditional rulers and ordinary citizens had increasingly become targets of kidnappers and armed groups, despite sustained military operations.

“If a General is not safe within the borders of our nation, then who truly is?” Agbedi asked.

He lamented what he described as the vulnerability of community leaders and traditional rulers who have become frequent targets of criminal elements.

“Our security is in the mud. Yet, the political class is busy rehearsing new political dance steps, seemingly unbothered,” he added.

The caucus urged Tinubu, as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, to immediately present a comprehensive security strategy capable of addressing the multifaceted threats confronting the country.

“At a period in our nation’s long-drawn battle with these insurgents, victory was close by, especially with the presence of mercenaries in the frontlines. Today, no one is sure what the strategy, if any, is,” Agbedi stated.

They also demanded improved welfare for security personnel, enhanced intelligence gathering and a complete overhaul of the nation’s security architecture.

The lawmakers expressed concern over the continued captivity of schoolchildren and teachers abducted in Oyo state, describing the development as another example of the state’s inability to guarantee the safety of its citizens.

“As we speak, school children and their teachers abducted in Oyo State remain in captivity. Their crime? Going to school in Nigeria,” Agbedi said.

The caucus called for an immediate and coordinated rescue operation by security agencies, warning that prolonged captivity could expose the victims to grave dangers.

The incident, they argued, evoked painful memories of previous mass abductions of students across the country, which have continued to raise concerns about the safety of schools despite government efforts under the Safe Schools Initiative.

The minority caucus also raised concerns over what it described as troubling developments within the judiciary, particularly a Federal High Court judgment ordering the Independent National Electoral Commission to deregister five opposition political parties.

According to Agbedi, the ruling raises serious questions about the health of Nigeria’s democracy and could undermine political pluralism ahead of future elections.

“This judgment, coming only months to the country’s general elections and after a subsisting Appeal Court decision on the same matter, is not intended to serve justice. Instead, it appears to be a deliberate ploy to engender judicial chaos weaponised to destabilise the polity,” he said.

See also  Oil output slumps as Nigeria, Libya, Venezuela drag OPEC+ targets

The Bayelsa lawmaker described the judgment as “rascality taken too far,” arguing that it set a dangerous precedent capable of weakening democratic participation and shrinking political space.

He questioned why submissions reportedly made by INEC, indicating that the affected parties had satisfied legal requirements through electoral victories in previous elections, were allegedly disregarded.

The caucus further alleged that opposition parties have increasingly faced institutional barriers, including delays in the registration of new political parties and attempts to frustrate emerging political coalitions.

“From external manipulations and executive meddlesomeness that kept old political structures polarised, to the attempt to truncate new alliances through institutional bottlenecks, such as the refusal to register new political parties, the whole goal has been to muscle all credible opposition out of the 2027 contest,” Agbedi alleged.

While welcoming the intervention of the Court of Appeal in halting implementation of the Federal High Court judgment, the lawmakers urged democratic stakeholders to remain vigilant.

Turning to the economy, the caucus painted a bleak picture of conditions facing Nigerians, citing inflation, high food prices, a weakening purchasing power and widespread hardship.

The lawmakers argued that the removal of fuel subsidy and the floating of the naira, key reforms introduced by the Tinubu administration, had imposed severe burdens on citizens without corresponding social protections.

“From Sokoto to Enugu, from Borno to Lagos, the story is the same: hunger, killings, kidnappings, collapse of the naira, collapse of hope,” Agbedi added.

The opposition lawmakers accused the ruling All Progressives Congress and the presidency of prioritising political activities over governance.

“Yet what preoccupies the ruling party and the Presidency is 2027 endorsement rallies, defections, re-election strategies and Town hall meetings to discuss tenure security,” he said.

See also  We’ll intensify efforts to checkmate terrorism in Nigeria – CDS Oluyede

They challenged President Tinubu to temporarily suspend political activities linked to the next election cycle and focus squarely on addressing the nation’s pressing challenges.

“President Tinubu must suspend all 2027 political activities and declare a six-month National Security and Economic Recovery Plan,” urging him to “Lead or leave.”

As part of its recommendations, the caucus called for “An independent and transparent investigation into the abduction and death of Maj Gen Abubakar, immediate efforts to secure the release of the abducted Oyo schoolchildren and urgent reforms within the security sector.”

The lawmakers also urged the Chief Justice of Nigeria to intervene in controversies arising from conflicting court judgments relating to political parties, while calling on INEC to protect democratic competition ahead of the 2027 elections.

Agbedi further warned against what he described as attempts to weaken opposition voices through judicial and institutional means.

“The attempt to kill opposition parties through judicial ambush, to ignore mass killings while chasing second term, and to normalise the abduction of children is a declaration of war against Nigerians,” he said.

He vowed that opposition lawmakers would continue to hold the government accountable through constitutional and legislative means.

“We will not be silent. We will not be intimidated. We will use every legislative instrument to hold this government accountable,” he stated.

Addressing Nigerians directly, Agbedi urged citizens not to lose faith in democracy despite the country’s present challenges.

He stated, “To Nigerians, do not despair. 2027 will not be decided in Aso Rock or by compromised courts. It will be decided by you, the people.

“The opposition parties will stand with you. The opposition will not be muscled out. Nigeria will be rescued.”

The briefing was attended by the House Minority Whip, Mansur Soro; Deputy Minority Leader, Abdussamad Dasuki and leader of the Nigeria Democratic Congress caucus in the House, Mr Afam Ogene.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Kwara drags Bukola Saraki to court over alleged defamation

Published

on

The Kwara State Government has filed a criminal defamation suit against former Senate President, Bukola Saraki, accusing him of making false claims about the educational background of Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq.

The case, instituted before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin, was filed by the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Senior Ibrahim, alongside the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ayoola Akande, and Assistant Chief State Counsel, B.L. Abdulsalam.

The matter came up on Wednesday before Justice M.O. Folorunso.

According to court documents, the government alleged that Saraki, on April 17, 2026, published and circulated statements through social media and newspaper platforms claiming that AbdulRazaq did not attain secondary school education.

The prosecution argued that the publication was false, malicious and intended to bring the governor and the state government into disrepute.

It further alleged that the statements contained insulting and abusive expressions capable of provoking public unrest and disturbing public peace, contrary to Section 399 of the Penal Code, Cap. P4, Laws of Kwara State, 2006.

At the proceedings, prosecuting counsel, R.O. Balogun, urged the court to issue a bench warrant against Saraki, arguing that the former Senate president failed to appear despite being served with the court processes.

“The defendant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. We, therefore, urge Your Lordship to issue a bench warrant to compel his attendance,” Balogun submitted.

He also opposed an application for adjournment filed by the defence, maintaining that the prosecution was ready to proceed with the case.

However, Saraki’s lawyer, Jimoh Mumini (SAN), challenged both the jurisdiction of the court and the validity of the service of the processes on his client.

See also  Kwara Residents Flee As ‘Terror Group’ Reportedly Issues Threat Letter

“This matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court. In addition, the defendant was not properly served with the processes relied upon by the prosecution,” Mumini argued.

After hearing submissions from both sides and standing down the matter for about two hours, Justice Folorunso ruled that the defendant was entitled to seek an adjournment and fixed July 3, 2026, for the hearing of the preliminary objection and possible arraignment.

The PUNCH reports that the latest suit deepens the legal confrontation between the AbdulRazaq administration and Saraki.

Earlier on April 9, the state government filed a separate 20-count charge against Saraki, former Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed, and two former aides over allegations relating to the arming of suspects convicted in connection with the 2018 Offa robbery attacks.

The other defendants in that case are Yusuf Abdulwahab, a former Chief of Staff to Ahmed, and Alabi Olalekan.

Responding to the earlier charges, Saraki denied any link to armed robbery or other criminal activities and insisted that previous investigations had cleared him of wrongdoing.

“I have nothing to do directly or indirectly with any case of armed robbery or any criminal matter,” Saraki said in a statement he personally signed.

The former Senate President maintained that he had been exonerated by both the police and the Director of Public Prosecutions in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, describing the prosecution as politically motivated.

In a statement issued on Wednesday by his media office, Saraki said his lawyers, led by  Mumini (SAN), appeared before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin to challenge the suit filed over a social media post he made on April 17, 2026, in response to an earlier statement by the state government.

See also  S’Africa restores power at Nigerian High Commission after debt payment

The case arose from allegations that Saraki’s comments on Facebook and X questioned the educational qualifications of Governor AbdulRazaq and amounted to criminal defamation and cyberbullying.

According to the statement issued by the Press Officer on Local Matters, Abubakar Bukola Saraki Media Office, Abdulkadir Abdulganiy, Saraki’s legal team, led by Mumini, maintained that the social media posts in question constituted a legitimate exercise of freedom of expression and a right of reply.

“Dr Saraki’s post on Facebook and X being complained of were mere exercises of his freedom of speech and right of reply, as the leader of the opposition to Governor Abdulrazaq’s political party,” the statement said.

It wondered why Saraki’s social media post could constitute criminal defamation and cyberbullying against the governor.

The statement noted, “We note that it is a recurring decimal for the Kwara governor to seek to use the courts to harass and intimidate the leaders of opposition in the state any time they make any comment against the policies and actions of his administration.

“We believe that, like his earlier efforts to abuse the judicial process to silence the opposition, this case will fall like a pack of badly arranged cards.

“We note that the Kwara State government believes the alleged defamatory social media post deserves more attention than the issue of acute insecurity plaguing the state, in which two of the three senatorial districts in the state have become a den of kidnappers, bandits, and insurgents.

“Also, the case of 176 people kidnapped from the Woro community in the northern part of the state who have been in captivity since early February is taking a back seat behind the issue of a social media post, which the governor’s handlers believed was unpleasant to him.

See also  Obasanjo to FG: Stop apologising, negotiating with terrorists

“Today, we noticed that the governor and his handlers mobilised the media and their supporters to the court premises. We believe the energy and resources deployed to achieve that could have been better utilised as part of the resources to secure the release of the captives in the kidnappers’ den across the state.

“We have mentioned these more sensitive alternatives that require the attention of Governor AbdulRazaq and his government instead of dissipating resources on the impact of words that he exchanged with the opposition leader in the state to demonstrate that the court case is just another diversionary tactic.”

It added, “Dr Saraki continues to retain his confidence in the Nigerian judiciary and its ability to do justice to all parties, in all cases and situations.

“That is why his lawyers will also continue to defend his position and strongly put forward his case before the court on all matters, including this case arising from a social media post.”

The former Senate President appealed to his supporters across the state and beyond to remain calm and law-abiding.

He assured them that all the oppressive tactics aimed at intimidating and silencing him would come to nought.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

ICPC defends El-Rufai detention as group hires US lobbyists

Published

on

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission has defended the detention and prosecution of former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, insisting that its actions are guided strictly by the law and not politics.

The commission’s reaction followed the announcement by the El-Rufai Support Group Association that it had engaged Vanguard Africa, a Washington DC-based international advocacy firm, to lead a campaign highlighting what it described as the erosion of the rule of law and abuse of due process in Nigeria.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Wednesday, the ICPC spokesman, John Odey, said the commission was not disturbed by the group’s decision to seek international support.

He said, “We are not moved. We operate within the confines of the law. The ICPC is not moved at all.

“We operate within the confines of the law and will continue to carry out our functions within the confines of the law. We are not detaining him on our own. We are following lawful orders.

“He is in our custody by court remand. So, we don’t have any issues with that.

It’s a free world, it’s a free society, but people must operate within the confines of the law.”

Odey also dismissed claims that the anti-corruption agency was being used for political purposes.

“No, we are not political. The ICPC is not political. It has never been and never will be. The ICPC is an anti-corruption law enforcement agency. We have an Act that guides our operations.

“If there are infractions that fall within our Act and we charge you to court, it doesn’t matter whether you are a clerk in a government agency, a private contractor who has contravened the laws, or a political figure. It is immaterial.

See also  Kabiru Turaki assumes office as PDP Chairman as the party's crisis deepens

“We do not politicise our issues, nor do we prosecute on the basis of political affiliations. The ICPC is not a political party and does not have any political affiliations,” he said.

Earlier, the El-Rufai Support Group Association announced the engagement of Vanguard Africa, a Washington DC-based international advocacy firm, to lead a campaign about what it described as the erosion of the rule of law and abuse of due process in Nigeria.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, ERSGA said Vanguard Africa would coordinate outreach to officials of the United States administration, members of Congress, relevant agencies, pro-democracy institutions and multilateral stakeholders on its behalf.

According to the association, a regulatory filing published by the US Department of State indicated that Vanguard Africa would plan and execute outreach to U.S. Administration officials, Congress, relevant bureaus and agencies, pro-democracy institutions, and multilateral stakeholders for ERSGA.

ERSGA said the campaign was focused on the case of El-Rufai, whom it described as a reformer and senior statesman with decades of public service.

“Vanguard Africa will plan and execute outreach to U.S. Administration officials, Congress, relevant bureaus and agencies, pro-democracy institutions, and multilateral stakeholders on behalf of ERSGA, among other activities in the United States.

“Nasir El-Rufai is an accomplished reformer and senior statesman with decades of public service. According to media reports, since mid-February, he has been detained by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, while courts have repeatedly delayed bail hearings.

“ERSGA categorically rejects the ICPC accusations and maintains El-Rufai’s innocence, pointing to a series of alarming procedural irregularities.

See also  Oyo abduction: Outrage spreads after teacher’s beheading, Tinubu vows rescue

“The treatment of Governor El-Rufai is not an isolated incident; it is a symptom of a deeper crisis threatening Nigeria’s democratic institutions,” the statement read.

Speaking on behalf of the association, Mohammed Salihu said the former governor’s case reflected broader concerns about democratic institutions in the country.

He added, “We are bringing these concerns to Washington because the international community has both the standing and the responsibility to speak plainly when due process is weaponised for political ends.”

The association said it viewed the case as a test of the impartiality of Nigeria’s institutions, particularly as the country prepares for the 2027 general elections.

ERSGA warned that the use of legal mechanisms to sideline opposition figures could undermine free and credible democratic competition.

The group also called on the United States Government, international democratic institutions and civil society organisations to closely monitor developments in Nigeria.

It urged them to speak clearly in defence of due process, judicial independence, and the democratic space that free and fair elections require.

El-Rufai is being prosecuted by the ICPC over allegations of abuse of office, financial impropriety, and fraud during his tenure as governor.

The former governor is also facing prosecution by the Department of State Service over the alleged wiretapping of communications of the National Security Adviser.

Continue Reading

News

Yahaya Bello trial: EFCC witness details alleged kickback scheme

Published

on

A prosecution witness in the ongoing trial of former Kogi State Governor, Yahaya Bello, on Wednesday, told the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Maitama, Abuja, that he paid between 50 and 60 per cent of commissions earned by his company from consultancy services to officials of the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service.

The witness, who testified as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission 18th prosecution witness (PW18), made the disclosure before Justice Maryanne Anineh while being led in evidence by EFCC lead counsel, Kemi Pinheiro, SAN.

The EFCC is prosecuting Bello alongside Umar Shuaibu Oricha and Abdulsalami Hudu on a 16-count charge bordering on criminal breach of trust and money laundering involving N110.4bn.

The witness told the court that his company, involved in information technology, software development and tax automation services, was engaged by KSIRS for consultancy work.

“My company had business dealings with the Kogi State Internal Revenue Service. It was in connection with that that my company was invited,” he said.

He explained that the initial agreement provided for a 15 per cent commission on tax collections above N350m, later reviewed downward to five per cent.

“The agreement was to receive 15 per cent commission on transactions above N350m. The agreement was later reviewed downward to five per cent because the internally generated revenue had grown significantly,” he said.

The witness identified former KSIRS Chairman, Yakubu Oseni, as one of the officials he dealt with during the arrangement, adding that payments from his firm’s commissions were shared with unidentified stakeholders.

See also  Oil output slumps as Nigeria, Libya, Venezuela drag OPEC+ targets

“Between 50 and 60 per cent of the commissions were paid to certain stakeholders,” he told the court.

When asked if such payments were part of the consultancy agreement, he responded: “No.”

He added that payments were made through bank transfers and cash transactions based on directives allegedly routed through Oseni’s Personal Assistant, Yusuf Abdulmumuni, and later through his successor’s aide, Abdulwahab.

The witness also identified account statements of Bespoke Business Solution as exhibits before the court, noting that a nominee signatory, Jami’u Salihu, operated independently on the account.

“Jami’u Salihu signs independently from me,” he said.

Reviewing financial exhibits, he confirmed inflows from KSIRS, including N92.4m on August 9, 2017, and N261.8m on August 14, 2017, followed by withdrawals made by Salihu.

He also confirmed N70m in payments to Efab Properties, but stated he could not identify the purpose of the transaction.

“I wouldn’t know which property was paid for because it was not my transaction,” he said.

He further told the court that he was not aware of complaints from the Kogi State Government regarding the consultancy services.

“No,” he responded when asked if there were complaints.

During cross-examination by defence counsel, P.B. Daudu (SAN), the witness confirmed the identities of other shareholders in his company and maintained that the consultancy services were satisfactorily executed.

Another prosecution witness, PW19, Jamilu Abdullahi, a Bureau de Change operator, also testified, identifying several companies and accounts linked to his business dealings.

Earlier, PW17, Shenu Bello Bala, an estate agent, completed his testimony and was discharged after cross-examination.

See also  Ibadan convention: PDP delegates arrive amid Saraki’s cancellation move

Justice Maryanne Anineh adjourned the matter to October 14, 15, 27, and 28, 2026, for continuation of trial proceedings at the FCT High Court, Maitama, Abuja.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending