Connect with us

Business

26 states lean on FAAC as wage bills outstrip IGR

Published

on

At least 26 state governments could not generate enough internal revenue to cover their personnel costs in 2025, as they continue to depend on allocations from the Federation Account despite a significant improvement in their finances.

An analysis by The PUNCH showed that only eight of the 34 states covered by a new BudgIT report generated Internally Generated Revenue higher than their personnel expenditure during the year. The eight states were Lagos, Enugu, Ogun, Delta, Kaduna, Kwara, Abia and Anambra.

The remaining 26 states generated about N1.16tn internally but spent approximately N1.91tn on personnel, leaving a gap of about N747bn between their combined IGR and wage-related expenditure.

The findings are contained in BudgIT’s 2026 report titled ‘Nigeria’s Economic Reforms: What Has Changed Across Nigeria’s States? An Analysis of State Finances in the Post-Subsidy Years’.

The report analysed actual figures contained in states’ full-year budget implementation reports for 2022 and 2025. Akwa Ibom and Rivers were excluded because of incomplete or unavailable data.

The figures do not imply that states are expected to finance salaries exclusively from IGR because statutory allocations are a legitimate source of government revenue. They, however, show the extent to which many states would struggle to meet even their personnel obligations without revenue distributed by the Federation Account Allocation Committee.

This dependence has persisted despite the sharp rise in revenues available to states following the removal of petrol subsidy, foreign exchange reforms, and higher revenues accruing to the Federation Account.

According to BudgIT, aggregate FAAC allocations increased from N3.43tn in 2022 to N11.38tn in 2025, representing a 232.06 per cent increase and a compound annual growth rate of 50.2 per cent.

IGR also increased substantially, rising from N1.57tn to N4.15tn over the same period, but its 165.01 per cent growth and 38.38 per cent CAGR lagged the expansion in FAAC receipts.

Consequently, states became more dependent on federal transfers despite generating more revenue internally. FAAC accounted for 68.7 per cent of aggregate state revenue in 2022 but increased to 73.3 per cent in 2025. Conversely, IGR’s share fell from 31.4 per cent to 26.7 per cent.

BudgIT said this showed that “despite improvements in domestic revenue mobilisation, many states remained heavily reliant on transfers from the Federation Account.”

It stressed that improving domestic revenue mobilisation would be critical to strengthening states’ long-term fiscal sustainability and reducing their dependence on federal transfers.

See also  Oyedele reveals how tax reform will protect low-income Nigerians

The report said, “Although statutory allocations accounted for a larger share of the overall increase in revenues, strengthening domestic revenue mobilisation remains essential for improving long-term fiscal sustainability and reducing dependence on federal transfers.”

A state-by-state comparison by The PUNCH showed wide disparities between personnel expenditure and internally generated revenue. Yobe generated only N15.42bn internally in 2025 but spent N76.34bn on personnel. Its personnel bill was therefore almost five times its IGR, leaving a shortfall of about N60.91bn.

Taraba generated N17.89bn against personnel expenditure of N55.60bn, meaning its personnel costs were more than three times its IGR. Sokoto recorded IGR of N20.58bn but personnel expenditure of N58.65bn, while Adamawa generated N24.14bn internally against a N65.73bn personnel bill.

Jigawa’s personnel expenditure stood at N92.66bn compared with IGR of N35.27bn, while Benue spent N73.94bn on personnel after generating N29.38bn internally.

Similarly, Kogi generated N36.50bn but recorded personnel expenditure of N89.20bn, while Kebbi’s N18.41bn IGR was less than half of its N44.82bn personnel expenditure.

Other states with personnel costs exceeding IGR included Bauchi, Bayelsa, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Edo, Ekiti, Gombe, Imo, Kano, Katsina, Nasarawa, Niger, Ondo, Osun, Oyo, Plateau and Zamfara.

In absolute terms, Oyo recorded the largest gap among the 26 states. The state generated N102.52bn internally but spent N170.04bn on personnel, creating a difference of about N67.51bn.

Yobe followed with a gap of about N60.91bn, while Jigawa recorded N57.39bn. Ondo’s personnel expenditure of N99.58bn exceeded its N45.63bn IGR by N53.94bn, while Kogi recorded a gap of N52.70bn. Bayelsa generated N52.15bn against N98.75bn in personnel expenditure, leaving a difference of N46.60bn.

Some states were much closer to financing their personnel costs internally. Edo generated N98.45bn and spent N99.27bn on personnel, leaving a gap of less than N1bn. Gombe generated N36.36bn compared with personnel expenditure of N53.95bn, while Osun recorded N58.80bn in IGR against N87.46bn in personnel costs.

The data showed that the situation improved slightly compared with 2022, when 28 of the 34 states had personnel expenditure above their IGR. Abia, Delta, Enugu and Kwara moved from having IGR below personnel expenditure in 2022 to generating enough internally to cover their wage-related costs by 2025. However, Ebonyi and Jigawa moved in the opposite direction.

The PUNCH further observed that the weakness in state-level fiscal independence is partly obscured by the enormous size of Lagos’ revenue base. Lagos generated N1.85tn in IGR in 2025, up from N656.35bn in 2022. Its IGR alone accounted for about 44 per cent of the N4.15tn generated by the 34 states covered by the report.

See also  Senate suspension row: Akpabio drags Natasha to Supreme Court

The state spent N333.67bn on personnel, meaning its IGR was more than five times its personnel expenditure. Enugu generated N406.77bn compared with personnel expenditure of N56.40bn, while Ogun generated N237.65bn against N151.27bn in personnel costs. Delta recorded N206.44bn in IGR and N197.81bn in personnel expenditure.

Other states whose IGR exceeded their personnel bills were Kaduna, which generated N86.72bn against N77.63bn; Kwara, N85.21bn against N65.22bn; Abia, N66.86bn against N62.26bn; and Anambra, N54.24bn against N39.95bn.

Lagos’ dominance also means the aggregate IGR position appears considerably stronger than that of the typical state. Excluding Lagos, the remaining 33 states generated about N2.30tn internally in 2025. Their combined personnel expenditure stood at roughly N2.56tn, meaning personnel costs exceeded IGR by about N254bn.

Enugu also recorded an exceptional increase that boosted the overall IGR figure. Its IGR jumped from N25.12bn in 2022 to N406.77bn in 2025, an increase of N381.66bn and a CAGR of 153.01 per cent, the highest among the states.

BudgIT, however, noted that the increase was largely attributable to proceeds collected by the Enugu State Housing Development Corporation from the government’s intervention in the landed property market.

The organisation expressed reservations about the classification and noted the potentially cyclical nature of the receipts. Niger recorded the second-fastest IGR growth, with collections rising from N12.11bn to N66.37bn, while Abia increased from N14.67bn to N66.86bn.

But not every state benefited from the IGR expansion. Three states recorded lower IGR in 2025 than in 2022. Jigawa suffered the biggest decline, falling from N59.40bn to N35.27bn. Sokoto’s IGR dropped from N23.60bn to N20.58bn, while Ebonyi declined marginally from N23.89bn to N23.25bn.

Jigawa’s position was particularly significant because its personnel expenditure rose from N52.37bn in 2022 to N92.66bn in 2025, while its IGR declined, substantially increasing its dependence on other revenue sources.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, recently called for stronger fiscal federalism, improved revenue generation and economic diversification to strengthen Nigeria’s resilience to economic shocks. The minister spoke in Owerri, the Imo State capital, at the 2026 National Council on Finance and Economic Development Retreat.

See also  Jigawa sacks 22 over Ramadan feeding scam

Speaking on the theme ‘Strengthening Fiscal Federalism for Equity, Sustainable Development and Economic Resilience in a Volatile Global Economy,’ Oyedele insisted on the retreat interrogating the current allocation and derivation principles, even as he called for greater fiscal responsibility, accountability and cooperation among Nigeria’s three tiers of government to achieve sustainable economic growth.

The minister urged state governments nationwide to strengthen their Internally Generated Revenue, attract investments and create jobs rather than rely heavily on federal allocations.

Also speaking, the Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, who was represented at the event by his Deputy, Chinyere Ekomaru, said that states must be empowered to generate more revenue and efficiently manage available resources, pointing out that continued dependence on oil revenue was no longer sustainable.

An economist and former Vice-Chancellor of the University of Uyo, Prof Akpan Ekpo, recently stressed that “states have to think of new ways of increasing their IGRs.” He urged the states to increase their revenue by increasing service delivery, which will attract more revenue.

A renowned economist and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, earlier said that a majority of states were not financially sustainable and were at risk of insolvency without a boost in investment.

He said, “This issue is a fiscal sustainability problem, showing that many states are not fiscally sustainable and need to work towards it; and that the states need to do a lot more to attract more investments to their states so that their level of dependence on the Federal Allocation Accounts Committee would reduce.

He also said that the state governors should reduce their bloated staff and political appointees. “Most of these states have heavy overhead and they have very bloated bureaucracy, political appointees and they are putting a lot of pressure on their resources, so they have to do some rationalisation on their staff, many of them don’t need more than 50 per cent of their workforce but for political reasons, they put all manner of characters on their payroll including the local government,” he said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

IMF warns poverty risks persist despite Nigeria’s economic stability

Published

on

The International Monetary Fund has warned that rising prices of essential goods could worsen poverty and food insecurity in Nigeria despite improvements in the country’s macroeconomic stability and favourable external trade conditions.

The IMF disclosed this in its October 2026 World Economic Outlook report, titled ‘Resilience Under Strain, Urgent Choices’, published on Tuesday, highlighting the growing disconnect between improvements in economic indicators and the living conditions of vulnerable households.

“Nigeria is supported by improved macroeconomic stability and favourable terms-of-trade effects, though higher prices for essentials are expected to further aggravate poverty and food insecurity,” the Fund stated.

The assessment suggests that Nigeria’s recent economic stabilisation efforts have strengthened its economic outlook but have yet to eliminate the pressures facing households, particularly those struggling with the rising cost of food and other basic necessities.

According to the IMF, Nigeria is among the larger economies in sub-Saharan Africa benefiting from earlier stabilisation measures and economic reforms, although the region remains exposed to commodity price volatility, climate shocks and limited access to external financing.

The report projected that economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa would remain stable at 4.5 per cent in 2026, reflecting differences in policy implementation, fiscal capacity and exposure to global economic disruptions.

It stated, “Growth in sub-Saharan Africa is expected to remain stable at 4.5 per cent in 2026, though this masks some substantial divergence across countries.”

The IMF explained that while oil-importing and non-resource-intensive economies were facing greater pressure from rising energy and food prices, some larger economies were benefiting from earlier reforms and improved economic conditions.

See also  Oyedele reveals how tax reform will protect low-income Nigerians

Nigeria’s favourable terms-of-trade position provides some support to economic activity, particularly amid changes in international commodity prices.

However, the Fund’s assessment indicates that stronger macroeconomic fundamentals do not automatically translate into improved household welfare, especially when the cost of essential commodities continues to rise.

The report also identified declining official development assistance and limited participation in the global artificial intelligence investment boom as challenges facing several African economies.

The IMF’s country-specific projections showed that Nigeria’s economy is expected to expand by 4.2 per cent in 2026, compared with an estimated 4.0 per cent in 2025, before accelerating to 4.3 per cent in 2027.

The 2026 forecast represents an upward revision of 0.1 percentage point from the Fund’s April projection, while the 2027 estimate was also raised by 0.1 percentage point.

On inflation, the IMF projected that Nigeria’s average consumer price inflation would decline from 23.0 per cent in 2025 to 15.6 per cent in 2026 and 14.7 per cent in 2027.

The report also projected Nigeria’s current account surplus at 7.0 per cent of Gross Domestic Product in 2026, compared with 4.8 per cent in 2025, before moderating to 4.4 per cent in 2027.

These projections suggest a stronger external position in 2026, although the expected decline in the surplus next year points to a moderation in external balances.

The IMF further warned that persistent geopolitical tensions, higher food and energy prices and tighter global financing conditions could undermine economic growth, particularly in developing countries.

It stated, “Risks are skewed to the downside,” identifying a prolonged Middle East conflict and further disruptions to energy infrastructure as potential threats to global economic stability.

See also  Senate suspension row: Akpabio drags Natasha to Supreme Court

To cushion vulnerable households, the Fund recommended temporary and targeted financial support rather than broad measures that could undermine fiscal sustainability.

It said governments should “rely primarily on temporary, targeted income support for the most vulnerable,” while strengthening social protection systems to respond more effectively to future economic shocks.

PUNCH Online earlier reported that Nigeria recorded the world’s largest increase in the number of people living in multidimensional poverty, with an additional 17.9 million Nigerians falling into poverty between 2021 and 2024, according to the 2026 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index.

The report, published on Monday by the United Nations Development Programme and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, showed that Nigeria experienced a reversal in poverty reduction after recording improvements between 2018 and 2021.

The findings placed Nigeria ahead of Afghanistan, which recorded an increase of 5.3 million poor people during its latest assessment period.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Indonesia promises Nigerian investors special incentives

Published

on

Indonesia has promised special privileges and incentives to Nigerian investors looking to set up businesses in Southeast Asia, including potential tax benefits and preferential treatment for investment-related processes.

A senior trade analyst with Indonesia’s trade promotion authorities, Iska Huberta Sinural, disclosed this on Tuesday, while addressing journalists from Nigeria in Jakarta ahead of the 41st Trade Expo Indonesia, saying the country was seeking to deepen its commercial relationship with Nigeria through increased trade, investment and business partnerships.

Sinural said Nigerian investors could explore opportunities in Indonesia, adding that investment-related incentives could include tax benefits and other forms of preferential treatment.

“There will be special treatment actually when you have to invest here. For the investment, we will give special or privilege. The visa for investors will be a bit different.

“The tax and also other things will be incentives,” she said.

According to Sinurat, Nigeria has consistently ranked among the leading countries whose buyers and visitors participate in the annual Indonesian trade exhibition, making it an important market for the country’s exporters.

She said Nigeria ranked fourth among buyers in 2022, third in 2024 and fourth in 2025, while its position among the top five buyers had been relatively consistent over the years.

“We have data on every time you come here to do some business and we also do some trade mission to your country,” she said.

The 41st Trade Expo, 2926, will Kickstart Wednesday October 14, till 18. The Trade Expo Indonesia is intended to bring together exporters, international buyers, investors and government representatives to facilitate commercial transactions and develop partnerships across multiple sectors.

Sinural speaking further, said, Indonesia was seeking to move beyond conventional buyer-seller transactions to establish longer-term partnerships, including investments by Nigerian businesses in Indonesian manufacturing, agriculture and other sectors.

See also  Senate suspension row: Akpabio drags Natasha to Supreme Court

“I mean, this is bilateral. It’s not always you buying from us, you can also invest in us. We also welcome you to introduce us to your product,” she said.

She argued that Nigerian investments in Indonesia could help businesses secure more reliable access to products, reduce the difficulties associated with shipping and build closer links with Indonesian manufacturers.

“The option of shipping, is a bit hard. So why don’t you invest here? And then it will be easy for us to get the products when you invest here,” she said.

Sinurat added that Indonesia could offer competitive labour and access to agricultural resources, while investors could explore opportunities to manufacture goods for the Nigerian market.

The trade analyst also encouraged Nigerian businesses to introduce locally produced food and beverages to Indonesian consumers, suggesting that product adaptation and cultural exchange could help Nigerian brands gain acceptance.

“For us to understand ourselves better, I guess one of the key points to explore is export things from Nigeria to Indonesia like food, beverages,” she said.

She added that Nigerian businesses could introduce speciality foods, coffee and beverages while adapting flavours, packaging and product sizes to Indonesian preferences.

Sinural said Indonesia was also interested in attracting Nigerian investors into sectors beyond merchandise trade, particularly where long-term partnerships could generate economic benefits for both countries.

Sinural said the 2026 Trade Expo Indonesia had exceeded its initial exhibitor target, with about 1,600 exhibitors registered against a target of 1,500.

She said the transaction target for this year’s exhibition was $17.5bn, compared with $16bn set for the previous edition.

She explained that the objective was not limited to increasing transaction values but also to attracting buyers from a wider range of countries, strengthening business networks and encouraging investment in Indonesia.

See also  Nigerians pay more for cement than African neighbours – FCCPC

“It’s not only to have the transaction, but also to have a relationship and we also hope, in this condition, that more investments can be made during this trade expo in Indonesia,” she said.

Sinurat said the organisers were particularly interested in expanding participation from non-traditional markets in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

She added that invitations had been extended to at least 30 countries as Indonesia sought to strengthen government-to-government engagement alongside business-to-business transactions.

“This year, actually, we sent an invitation to at least 30 countries. Because this year, we want to have a government G2G relationship,” she said.

The exhibition’s major sectors include food, beverages and agricultural products; manufacturing; industrial estates and services; fashion and handicrafts; and furniture and home décor.

On his part, the Export Enhancement Division representative of the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Muhammad Alpvy, said there was considerable untapped potential in trade and investment between Indonesia and African countries, including Nigeria.

Alpvy, said Indonesia was seeking to expand exports beyond existing product categories and strengthen cooperation in food processing, agricultural commodities, furniture, manufacturing and renewable energy.

He said Nigerian businesses could explore opportunities in Indonesia while Indonesian companies could also establish manufacturing operations in Nigeria, creating a more sustainable commercial relationship.

According to him, trade between the two countries could expand significantly if the growing number of Nigerian visitors and business delegations translated into more concrete transactions and investment agreements.

Alpvy, estimated that Nigeria’s delegation to Indonesia had grown from between 100 and 150 participants in the previous year to about 250 in 2026, representing an increase of approximately 40 per cent based on the figures he cited.

See also  Anthony Joshua breaks silence after fatal crash

He said the larger delegation presented an opportunity to expand transactions, although the actual value would depend on the products involved, the quantities purchased and the agreements concluded.

Alpvy, said Nigeria and Indonesia could also strengthen cooperation in palm oil, rubber products, healthcare manufacturing, agricultural processing and renewable energy.

He identified shipping costs and trade barriers as factors that could limit the expansion of bilateral commerce between Nigeria and Indonesia, adding that investment and local manufacturing arrangements could help businesses overcome some of the difficulties associated with direct exports.

“I believe some of the African countries already have this kind of trade agreements with Indonesia, but still ongoing,” he said.

Encouraging Nigeria to make its trade process less cumbersome while he stressed that tariffs and shipping costs were among the areas requiring further attention.

Alpvy, also highlighted opportunities in waste management and green energy, including the conversion of agricultural and animal waste into alternatives to coal.

He said Nigerian and Indonesian businesses had previously discussed cooperation in renewable energy and the establishment of factories, but further discussions were needed to determine the appropriate investment arrangements.

“First thing first about the investment is to make the format, how we can collaborate,” he said.

Alpvy, urged Nigerian investors to consider Indonesia as a destination for long-term business partnerships, while encouraging Indonesian companies to explore opportunities in Nigeria.

He said both countries stood to benefit from cooperation that went beyond seasonal trading and focused on sustained investment, local production and technology transfer.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Musk spends $276m backing Republicans in midterms — Report reveals

Published

on

Tech billionaire Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, has contributed $276 million to organisations boosting the campaigns of right-wing American candidates ahead of upcoming midterm elections, US media reported Monday.

The sum, all contributed since July, positions Musk as the largest single donor for the November 3 elections, according to the New York Times. He has spent a total of $366 million this election cycle.

The largest funding recipient was the Republican’s Senate Leadership Fund, receiving $158 million, aimed at maintaining the party’s control of the upper house of Congress despite a slim margin.

The SpaceX and Tesla boss is no stranger to massive US election spending, having contributed $`290 million in 2024 to help US President Donald Trump win reelection.

Trump allowed Musk to work in the White House for several months overseeing his cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) venture, but exited the role after a public falling out with the president.

They’ve since reconciled, and Trump awarded Musk the National Medal of Science at an event in DC last week.

Though individual campaign donations in the United States are capped at `$3,300 per person, loopholes in the US campaign finance system allow political mega donors to contribute to funds known as political action committees or “PACs,” which support candidates.

Musk donated $76 million this summer to his own America PAC, the New York Times reported.

Other recipients of Musk’s political funding include $20 million to the Republican’s Congressional Leadership Fund, $10 million each to the Republican Governors Association and the Lone Star Liberty PAC, and $2 million to the Republican Attorneys General Association.

See also  CNG price hits N450/SCM as FG withdraws subsidies

AFP

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending