Connect with us

Business

FG’s N9tn domestic loans surge drains lifeline from businesses

Published

on

The Federal Government’s domestic borrowings from financial market operators rose sharply in 2025 despite high interest rates, widening the gap between public and private sector access to credit, according to data obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria on Thursday.

An analysis of money and credit statistics showed that credit to the Federal Government outpaced private sector borrowings by N9.19tn, representing a 695.6 per cent swing in 2025, reflecting heightened fiscal pressures and increased reliance on local funding sources.

In contrast, net credit to the private sector declined by N1.543tn in 2025, highlighting the challenges faced by businesses amid tight monetary conditions and elevated interest rates. This divergence underscored a growing imbalance in the allocation of financial system resources, with the public sector absorbing a larger share of available liquidity.

The trend points to a classic crowding-out effect, as rising government demand for funds limits banks’ capacity to extend credit to the productive sector, while many organised businesses increasingly prioritise settling existing debts rather than taking on new borrowing.

The PUNCH reports that in monetary and financial statistics, credit to government refers to funds extended to the Federal Government by the domestic financial system, mainly through the purchase of government securities such as Treasury bills, bonds, and other debt instruments, as well as direct lending by banks and other financial institutions.

This form of credit is typically used to finance budget deficits, refinance maturing obligations, support capital and recurrent expenditure, and manage short-term cash flow gaps when government revenues fall short of spending needs.

Credit to the private sector, on the other hand, represents loans and advances granted by banks and other financial institutions to businesses, households, and non-government entities. It is primarily used to fund working capital, business expansion, investment in plant and machinery, trade, agriculture, services, and consumer spending. Growth in private sector credit is widely regarded as a key indicator of economic activity, as it supports production, job creation, and overall economic growth.

In practice, when government borrowing from the financial system rises sharply, especially in a high-interest-rate environment, it can reduce the pool of funds available for private sector lending, a phenomenon often described as crowding out. This dynamic can raise borrowing costs for businesses and slow investment, even as the government secures financing to meet its fiscal obligations.

An analysis of CBN money and credit statistics obtained showed that credit to the Federal Government rose by N9.192tn in 2025, while credit to the private sector declined by N1.543tn over the same period.

The data highlight intensifying concerns over crowding-out effects, as the government’s rising appetite for domestic funds coincided with shrinking credit to businesses and households.

According to the CBN data, credit to the public sector increased significantly in 2025, rising from N25.03tn in January to N34.22tn by December, translating to a N9.19tn increase within the year. It also represented an increase of N5.57tn, or nearly 154 per cent, compared with the N3.62tn government credit recorded in 2024.

A month-on-month breakdown revealed that government credit stood at N25.03tn in January 2025 before rising by N2.08tn, or 8.3 per cent, to N27.11tn in February. This was followed by a contraction of N2.52tn (9.3 per cent) in March to N24.59tn, and a further dip of N655bn (2.7 per cent) in April to N23.93tn. Borrowing eased again in May, falling by N946bn (4.0 per cent) to N22.99tn, and declined by another N1.33tn (5.8 per cent) in June to N21.66tn, marking the lowest level for the year.

Government credit rebounded in July, increasing by N2.03tn (9.4 per cent) to N23.69tn, before slipping by N740bn (3.1 per cent) to N22.95tn in August. The upward trend resumed in September, with credit rising by N1.21tn (5.3 per cent) to N24.16tn, followed by a N629bn (2.6 per cent) increase in October to N24.79tn. In November, borrowing grew further by N1.57tn (6.3 per cent) to N26.35tn, before surging sharply in December by N7.87tn, or 29.9 per cent, to close the year at N34.22tn.

In contrast, net credit to the private sector contracted by N1.54tn in 2025, reflecting tight liquidity conditions and elevated borrowing costs. Private sector credit declined from N77.38tn in January to N76.26tn in February, representing a N1.12tn or 1.4 per cent drop. This was followed by a marginal decline of N276bn (0.4 per cent) in March to N75.98tn.

See also  FG declares holidays, deploys security amid terror alert ahead of Eid-el-Kabir celebration

Borrowing rebounded in April, rising by N2.09tn (2.7 per cent) to N78.07tn, before easing slightly by N100bn (0.1 per cent) to N77.97tn in May. Credit fell sharply in June by N1.84tn (2.4 per cent) to N76.13tn, but edged up in July by N598bn (0.8 per cent) to N76.72tn. August recorded another contraction of N841bn (1.1 per cent) to N75.88tn, followed by a steep decline of N3.36tn (4.4 per cent) in September to N72.53tn, the lowest point for the year.

Private sector credit recovered modestly in October, increasing by N1.88tn (2.6 per cent) to N74.41tn, and edged up by N220bn (0.3 per cent) in November to N74.63tn. In December, borrowing rose by N1.20tn (1.6 per cent) to close the year at N75.83tn, still well below the January level.

For context, government borrowing from the financial system increased by N3.62tn in 2024, far lower than the N9.19tn expansion recorded in 2025, while private sector credit grew by N1.54tn in 2024 but reversed into a contraction of N1.543tn in 2025.

A comparison of borrowing from the domestic financial system showed that government credit accelerated sharply in 2025 compared with 2024, beginning from January, when credit to the Federal Government rose to N25.03tn in 2025, up from N23.52tn recorded in January 2024.

In January, government credit stood at N25.03tn in 2025, up N1.51tn or 6.4 per cent from N23.52tn recorded in January 2024. By February, credit rose to N27.11tn, representing a sharp N8.69tn or 47.2 per cent increase compared with N18.43tn in February 2024.

However, in March, government borrowing moderated to N24.59tn, still N4.54tn or 22.6 per cent higher than N20.05tn in March 2024. In April, credit stood at N23.93tn, an increase of N3.96tn or 19.8 per cent over N19.98tn in April 2024.

In May, CPS declined year-on-year, falling to N22.99tn in 2025, which was N5.39tn or 19.0 per cent lower than the N28.38tn recorded in May 2024. The downward trend continued in June, with credit at N21.66tn, down N2.27tn or 9.5 per cent from N23.93tn in June 2024.

Government borrowing also trailed 2024 levels in July, standing at N23.69tn, which was N3.87tn or 19.5 per cent higher than July 2024’s N19.83tn, reflecting a rebound. In August, credit dropped sharply year-on-year to N22.95tn, a decline of N8.20tn or 26.3 per cent from N31.15tn in August 2024.

In September, CPS stood at N24.16tn, representing a steep N15.31tn or 38.8 per cent drop compared with N39.47tn recorded in September 2024. October followed a similar pattern, with government credit at N24.79tn, down N14.60tn or 37.1 per cent from N39.39tn in October 2024.

In November, credit rose to N26.35tn, but was still N13.26tn or 33.5 per cent lower than N39.62tn recorded a year earlier. By December, however, borrowing surged to N34.22tn, exceeding N27.14tn in December 2024 by N7.08tn or 26.1 per cent, driving the overall annual increase of N9.19tn in 2025.

Private sector borrowing showed a contrasting pattern. In January 2025, credit stood at N77.38tn, up N898bn or 1.2 per cent from N76.48tn in January 2024. However, in February, borrowing dropped to N76.26tn, a sharp N4.97tn or 6.1 per cent decline compared with N81.22tn recorded in February 2024.

In March, private sector credit stood at N75.98tn, N4.55tn or 6.4 per cent higher than N71.43tn in March 2024. April also recorded an increase, with credit rising to N78.07tn, up N5.15tn or 7.1 per cent from N72.92tn a year earlier.

By May, borrowing rose to N77.97tn, an increase of N3.66tn or 4.9 per cent over N74.31tn in May 2024. In June, credit stood at N76.13tn, up N2.94tn or 4.0 per cent compared with N73.19tn in June 2024.

The trend reversed in July, as credit eased to N76.72tn, marginally N1.22tn or 1.6 per cent higher than N75.51tn in July 2024. In August, borrowing declined to N75.88tn, N1.15tn or 1.5 per cent higher than N74.73tn in August 2024, indicating stagnation.

In September, private sector credit fell sharply to N72.53tn, down N3.31tn or 4.4 per cent from N75.83tn in September 2024. October followed with N74.41tn, a slight N339bn or 0.5 per cent increase over N74.07tn in October 2024.

See also  Nigeria, Indonesia trade tops $3bn annually — envoy reveals

In November, borrowing slipped to N74.63tn, N1.33tn or 1.8 per cent lower than N75.96tn in November 2024. By December, credit stood at N75.83tn, representing a N2.19tn or 2.8 per cent decline from N78.02tn recorded in December 2024, culminating in a N1.54tn net contraction for 2025.

Commenting on behalf of the Organised Private Sector and the manufacturing industry, the Director-General of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Segun Kadir Ajayi, said credit data from the financial system point to a clear crowding-out of private sector borrowing by government demand.

In a telephone interview on Thursday, Ajayi said the trend reflects the preference of commercial banks and other financial institutions to lend to government, given prevailing interest rates and perceived lower risk, to the detriment of productive sectors of the economy.

The MAN DG said, “The data is a trend that proves something. Usually when you see such trends, it is indicative of the private sector being crowded out in terms of borrowing. Because when you borrow, you would repay and so the rate at which you borrow is critical for your operations and when commercial banks and financial institutions find it a lot easier to lend to government rather than to the private sector.”

Ajayi noted that the manufacturing sector has been particularly affected, with many firms scaling back borrowing for expansion and raw material sourcing amid high costs and weak economic conditions.

According to him, the slowdown in private sector credit is consistent with the broader lack of economic buoyancy, including weak consumer demand and limited liquidity in the system.

“You also have discovered that the manufacturing sector has been challenged and so borrowing for expansion and raw material sourcing has been low keyed.  So you would expect less credit because there has been no bouyancy in terms of purchases and in terms of the funds available. So you should expect this type of trend. Many manufacturers are simply not in a position to take on expensive credit,” he added.

He, however, said the development underscores the need for deliberate policy intervention to stimulate industrial growth through targeted financing.

“But what this means is that government should be intentional with about making low cost credit available to the sector, so that you can stimulate their appetite for borrowing and work to expand, scale and not working to pay the banks. This is just the simple explanation,” he advised.

Economist reacts

In his expert comment on the issue, Muda Yusuf, renowned economist and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, warned that rising Federal Government borrowing from the domestic financial system is increasingly crowding out the private sector, as banks favour low-risk, high-yield government securities over lending to businesses.

Yusuf noted that while the private sector still accounts for a larger share of total outstanding credit in absolute terms, the direction of credit flow is a growing concern.

“The increase in credit to the government can be attributed to a number of factors. The government has been raising money to finance the deficit. So this financing of deficit has led to the issuance of bonds, treasury bills and so on, which banks also buy. The rate is also very attractive and it’s more attractive to them than to be lending to the real sector,” Yusuf said in a telephone conversation with our correspondent

According to him, the surge in government borrowing is largely driven by the need to finance widening fiscal deficits, which has translated into increased issuance of Treasury bills, bonds and other government securities. Yusuf noted that the prevailing interest rate environment has further tilted banks’ preference towards government instruments.

“The second point is that the risk of lending to government is extremely very low because it is a sovereign debt and government can’t come back to you and say they won’t pay back. It won’t happen. Except for those local contractors. But if it is through the financial system, they raise funds through government bonds. So the risk is low, rates are very attractive and the banks normally prefer this option because they are more comfortable,” he said.

See also  Police summon VeryDarkMan, quiz AIG over allegations

He added that, unlike private sector lending, government borrowing through the financial system carries minimal default risk. “If it is through the financial system, funds are raised through government bonds. The risk is low, rates are attractive, and banks are more comfortable with that option,” Yusuf said. “Lending to the private sector is riskier for them.”

As a result, he said the private sector is increasingly unable to compete with the government for credit. “To that extent, you can say the government is gradually crowding out the private sector,” he stated. “They cannot compete with the government when it comes to credit. The risk for bonds is low, but the interest rate is high.”

Yusuf said this dynamic has intensified calls for the government to moderate its borrowing. On the private sector side, Yusuf pointed to persistently high interest rates as a major deterrent to borrowing and investment. He explained that while the government can raise funds by issuing bonds without negotiating loans with banks, private businesses face tougher conditions.

“There is a bit of crowding-out, and that’s why some people are arguing that government should borrow less, so that they don’t crowd out the private sector.

“The second point on the private sector side is that the interest rate is still high. So there is no business you can do with credit facilities of up to 30 per cent. The Monetary Policy Rate is still at 27 per cent. But for the government, they only have to issue bonds, they won’t have to meet banks for loans, only the state government meet government for loans and pays back through FAAC allocations. These are some of the issues,” he said.

Commenting on what declining private sector credit signals about the economy, Yusuf said it should be a major concern for policymakers.

“Of course, it indicates that something is not right in the economy. It should be a concern for the government, because with the interest rate at that level, how do you want to promote investment? It should be a concern. The private sector borrows to invest, so if it’s not there, it will affect growth. The government is only borrowing to finance the deficit.

“We want the banks to support the private sector more than they are doing now. You can also do some comparison with what other banking institutions are doing in other countries. You would observe that it is low compared to other countries. Our credit to the private sector compared to Gross Domestic Product shows the level of the financial system is supporting the sector,” he warned.

The economist also noted that Nigeria’s private sector credit levels remain weak compared to peer economies. On solutions, Yusuf said restoring balance in credit allocation would require a combination of lower interest rates, reduced government borrowing, and stronger revenue mobilisation.

He added that improved revenue generation would ease pressure on the financial system. “The only solution is to move the economy in a way that the interest rate is lower for borrowing. Recapitalisation can help to support big investment, but the interest rate has to come down. Inflation has to come down. The government should borrow less and focus on revenue, so the funds can go to the private sector,” Yusuf concluded.

The surge in government borrowing comes amid persistent fiscal pressures, including rising debt servicing costs, revenue shortfalls, and increased spending obligations following fuel subsidy reforms and exchange rate adjustments.

At the same time, the CBN’s tight monetary stance, anchored on elevated interest rates to rein in inflation, has raised the cost of borrowing across the economy, disproportionately affecting the private sector.

With inflationary pressures persisting and interest rates remaining high, stakeholders say a rebalancing of credit allocation will be critical to support growth, job creation, and industrial expansion.

As Nigeria navigates ongoing fiscal and monetary reforms, the widening gulf between public and private sector borrowing is expected to remain a key indicator of the health, or strain, within the financial system.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Nigeria imports N1tn steel despite N7.2bn Ajaokuta spend

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  No directive to suspend sachet alcohol ban, says NAFDAC

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  NNPC boosts Dangote refinery crude supply to seven cargoes – Sources

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  Nigeria secures $18.2bn oil investments, 28 field plans

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending