Connect with us

Business

Nigerians cut household spending by N14tn as inflation bites hard

Published

on

Household consumption in Nigeria slumped sharply in real terms in 2024 as rising prices eroded the purchasing power of millions of families, according to provisional figures from the Central Bank of Nigeria’s latest statistical bulletin.

Data on Gross Domestic Product by expenditure showed that household final consumption expenditure at 2010 constant purchasers’ prices fell from N45.41tn in 2023 to N31.12tn in 2024.

This represents a real decline of about N14.29tn, or roughly 31 per cent year-on-year, signalling a major contraction in the volume of goods and services consumed by households. Constant price data are adjusted for inflation, meaning they strip out the effect of rising prices to measure actual changes in economic activity.

When this measure collapses, as seen in 2024, it suggests that households are cutting back materially on what they can afford, not just paying more for the same items. However, the same indicator measured at current purchasers’ prices tells a very different but revealing story.

Household consumption at current prices rose from N146.69tn in 2023 to N173.01tn in 2024, an increase of about N26.31tn or nearly 18 per cent. Current price figures are not adjusted for inflation. They simply reflect what households spent in naira terms.

The fact that nominal spending rose while real spending plunged shows that Nigerians are spending more money but getting less value, with inflation swallowing a large share of household budgets.

The steep fall in real household spending is consistent with the sustained double-digit inflation that characterised the year. Nigeria’s headline inflation rate began 2024 at 29.90 per cent in January, up from around 28.9 per cent in December 2023, reflecting continued pressure on prices early in the year.

Throughout 2024, inflation climbed further, with official data showing it reached around 34.80 per cent in December 2024, one of the highest annual rates in the decade.

See also  Free zones attract $200bn FDI, create 500,000 jobs – FG

The year-on-year inflation acceleration over 2024 was driven by persistent increases in food and other essential prices and was marginally higher at the end of the year compared with November.

The persistent high inflation through 2024 compounded the cost-of-living squeeze on Nigerian households. Soaring food, transport, energy, and accommodation costs have pushed many families to the edge, forcing them to prioritise basic survival over discretionary spending.

Even staple food items rose beyond the reach of many lower-income earners, while the removal of petrol subsidy and exchange rate pressures filtered through to almost every aspect of daily living.

The data also paint a worrying picture of real employee earnings. Compensation of employees at 2010 constant purchasers’ prices fell from N28.27tn in 2023 to N25.48tn in 2024.

This represents a drop of about N2.78tn, or close to 10 per cent. In simple terms, when adjusted for inflation, the total value of wages and salaries in the economy declined, meaning workers’ earnings bought less than they did a year earlier.

By contrast, compensation of employees at current prices increased from N63.83tn to N75.59tn, a nominal rise of roughly N11.76tn or about 18 per cent. This again highlights the inflation problem.

While employers may have raised salaries on paper, those increases were not enough to keep pace with rising prices. Real incomes shrank despite higher nominal pay, reinforcing the pressure on household consumption.

Economists often rely on constant-price indicators to understand whether an economy is genuinely expanding or contracting. In this case, the slump in real household spending signals weakening domestic demand, which is a key engine of economic growth.

Household consumption typically accounts for the largest share of GDP on the expenditure side. When consumers cut back at this scale, businesses in retail, manufacturing, services, and hospitality are likely to feel the impact through lower sales, slower production, and reduced investment.

Earlier in 2024, the Chief Executive Officer of Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprises, Muda Yusuf, said the persistent inflationary pressures continue to be a troubling phenomenon.

See also  Olodo uprising: Tinubu aide faults critics of First Lady’s Akara, Kuli kuli comment

Reacting to inflation figures released by the NBS in February 2024, Yusuf said in a statement that the purchasing power had continued to slump over the past few months, pushing Nigerians into poverty.

The CPPE CEO bemoaned that, as inflation maintained an upward trend, economic growth may remain subdued, while the risk of stagflation heightens

“Regrettably, the major inflation drivers are not receding; if anything, they have become even more intense. These include the depreciating exchange rate, surging transportation costs, logistics challenges, forex market illiquidity, astronomical hike in diesel cost, insecurity in farming communities, and structural bottlenecks to production. These are largely supply-side issues.

“The weakening of the naira against the currency of our neighbouring countries [CFA], has continued to incentivise the outflow of agricultural products to these countries. This is complicating the supply side challenges, especially of food crops,” the CEO said.

According to Yusuf, the high inflation is causing increased pressure on production costs, making it harder for businesses to maintain profitability. This, in turn, is eroding shareholder value and lowering investor confidence.

By January 2024, the National President of the Association of Small Business Owners of Nigeria, Dr Femi Egbesola, said the rising inflation has negatively impacted the private sector and the economy as a whole.

He said, “This is because inflation has led to a loss of consumers’ purchasing power, increased production costs, and a reduction in profitability. Inflation has made our businesses less attractive for investors and, by extension, the economy.”

As inflation rises, low labour income has pushed an estimated 14 million Nigerians into poverty in 2024, according to the World Bank’s report on Macro Poverty Outlook: Country-by-Country Analysis and Projections for the Developing World.

See also  Starmer pushes strategic UK-Nigeria alliance with N1.4tn fresh deal

The report noted that nearly 47 per cent of the Nigerian population now lives below the international poverty line of $2.15 per day, as surging inflation and a struggling economic structure fail to meet the demands of rapid population growth.

It read, “Labour incomes have not kept pace, pushing an additional 14 million Nigerians into poverty in 2024. An estimated 47 per cent of Nigerians now live in poverty (or below the international poverty line of $2.15.”

In response to the rising poverty levels, the report noted that the Nigerian government has launched temporary cash assistance initiatives targeting 15 million households.

Each household will receive N75,000, distributed in three instalments, benefitting an estimated 67 million people overall.

The World Bank added, “Poverty is estimated at 52 per cent in 2026. Reforms to protect the poorest against inflation and boost livelihoods through more productive work are key for Nigerians to escape poverty. A tight monetary stance while avoiding reliance on ways and means remains crucial for moderating inflation.”

The World Bank stressed the need for continued reforms, noting that “While macro stabilisation is essential and currently underway, by itself it is insufficient to enable Nigeria to reach its growth potential. Sustained efforts and the establishment of a credible track record are necessary to achieve sustained progress.

“Economic growth has struggled to keep pace with population growth, contributing to poverty exacerbated by double-digit inflation.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Free zones attract $200bn FDI, create 500,000 jobs – FG

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  Olodo uprising: Tinubu aide faults critics of First Lady’s Akara, Kuli kuli comment

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  Forbes: Aliko Dangote’s wealth surges by almost 100% to $23.9bn, now 86th richest in the world

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  World Bank unveils $510m deal to boost investments

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending