Connect with us

Politics

GAC in turmoil as faction moves to sack Lagos APC chairman

Published

on

Some members of the Governance Advisory Council of the Lagos State chapter of the All Progressives Congress were on Monday divided over the call for the sacking of the party’s chairman, Pastor Cornelius Ojelabi.

The GAC is the highest decision-making organ of the APC in Lagos State.

The development followed a protest by some aggrieved party members who stormed the state House of Assembly to call for the sacking of Ojelabi and other party chieftains over what they described as “imposition of candidates” and “anti-grassroots leadership.”

The party chairman, however, faulted the call, describing the accusations as baseless.

The protesters from different local councils in the state held placards with inscriptions such as “Ojelabi Must Go,” “Faleke is a Betrayal,” and “Ojelabi, Mr Voter’s Apathy.”

They called for inclusion, fairness, and an end to what they described as top-down manipulation of local politics.

One of the protest leaders, Ogumba Adetunbosun from Ikorodu, said the protest was borne out of deep dissatisfaction with the way local government elections were conducted and how supervisory positions were being imposed without input from the grassroots.

“We’re concerned politicians from all 57 local councils. What brought us here is the injustice we witnessed in the just-concluded local government elections.

“Chairmen and vice-chairmen have emerged, but when it came to appointing supervisors and secretaries to local governments, we were sidelined. There was no consultation, no dialogue, and that’s not democracy,” Adetunbosun said.

Another protester, Mrs Bola Balogun from Agbado Oke-Odo LCDA, accused top APC leaders of stifling local democracy.

“Governor Sanwo-Olu said we shouldn’t appoint supervisors for (two) months. Why? They want to impose on us.

“We voted for Mr Governor and President Tinubu, not for them to impose appointees on us. Ojelabi and Fanleke are choking the Lagos APC. They’re not listening to the grassroots, and they’re killing the spirit of democracy,” she said.

Speaking on Monday in an interview, a member of GAC, Chief Muraina Taiwo, backed the call for the chairman’s sacking, saying Ojelabi was only loyal to a faction of the party in the state, known as the ‘Justice Forum,’ sidelining the ‘Mandate’ and other factions.

Muraina said he was not initially aware of the protest, but noted that “what I know is that party stalwarts are not happy with the party chairman, most especially. The opinion is that they believe he is a Justice Forum member, and he is not trying to balance things. It is obvious in his dealings that he belongs to a faction.

See also  Rising opposition attacks spark concerns ahead of 2027 elections

“Imagine that in Oshodi, I was the one who brought the party there since the days of Lateef Jakande. The party chairman knows my ward. Because he knows my child was in the race, they went to write in my ward that they want a female, and my child had paid for the form. He was aspiring for the position of a councillor. He wanted me to go and lobby stakeholders in the Justice Forum, who are his leaders. I’m not totally for him as chairman, but I’m not a part of this protest. However, his dealings are what is only playing out.”

On the appointment of LG supervisors, the GAC member said it was normal for the governor and party leaders to approve their appointments. “That is how it’s supposed to be. It has been like that for a long time since Jakande’s days.”

Speaking further on alleged sidelining, he said, “Out of all the 57 local governments. Check, the whole council, all Justice Forum’s members, through the state chairman’s directive, took all the slots for councillors. If they don’t change before the 2027 elections, things will be worse.

“He does not have experience. It was with a fight that we took 20 slots for the chairman from them. So if they want us to win the 2027 elections, they should remove that chairman.”

Another GAC member who did not want to be quoted said he was not aware of the call for the chairman’s removal at the GAC level.

“Such a thing was not discussed at any GAC meeting that somebody should be removed. That is not to say that those people making those demands are frivolous; it’s not to say that.

“I’m only responding to your question about whether GAC knows about it. But then we cannot throw away whatever they have said as long as they are members of the APC.

“Firstly, you are just telling me about the protest. I’m hearing it for the first time. There was no meeting where it (chairman’s removal) was discussed. But we will look at the situation as presented. We will look at it and we will deal with it accordingly.

See also  Ekiti 2026: Oluyede Resists Move To Stop His Participation

“You can’t hear from one side and conclude; it is the duty of GAC members to make sure that there is peace within the party,” the source said.

The chairman of GAC, Chief Tajudeen Olusi, could not be reached for comments on Monday, as an aide who picked up his call said the elder statesman was not available at the moment.

Chairman kicks

Ojelabi, however, described the claims by the aggrieved members as baseless and lacking substance.

In an interview with our correspondent on Monday, Ojelabi said he was not bothered by the protest, noting that things would no longer be “business as usual” in the party.

He faulted claims that his leadership was not beneficial to the aggrieved members.

“It’s not beneficial to them and we went to elections and won 375 councillors out of 376? We won 57 council chairmen, and it’s not beneficial to them?

“These are people who do not have substance as to what they are doing. It’s not going to be business as usual. We owe it a responsibility to the people of Lagos State to deliver the dividends of democracy.

“They expect that just as the council chairmen were sworn in yesterday (on Sunday), the issue of appointment of supervisors and other things should just follow immediately, and the governor made a pronouncement: ‘Allow these people to settle down. Let them understand the rudiments of governance. Give them the first 30 days to understand what they are inheriting. As you inherit assets, you equally inherit liability.’

“Is it at the state level that we’re going to appoint supervisors and SAs? No. We want the involvement of the leadership of each local government.”

He said the aggrieved members are people who did not have a grassroots base but believe that an imposition is ongoing.

“Did we impose councillors on them? They all emerged from their respective areas. Those who did not fit into the democratic process are the ones fighting back, but I’m not bothered. To the best of my knowledge, we have conducted the best local government election.”

See also  Osun 2026: Ademola Adeleke may emerge Accord Party gov candidate today

On uniting the aggrieved party members, he said, “It’s a matter of time. By the time the leadership recommends who will be supervisors from their respective local governments, that is what we’re going to adopt. You can’t satisfy human beings.

“The leadership of each local government from the 20 LGAs and 37 LCDAs will recommend them based on the contribution of individuals. That is the mechanism. If you work assiduously for our success, let such people be rewarded. Not ‘because I know Ojelabi, he should appoint me as supervisor.’ No, I can’t be everywhere.

“Whatever they recommend is what we are going to approve. So they are just putting the cart before the horse. The process of appointing supervisors will not come up until the next 30 to 45 days. So that’s it, I’m not bothered. It’s an in-house issue and we will resolve it,” the chairman added.

In a Monday statement, the APC spokesperson in the state, Seye Oladejo, said the party acknowledged and respected the rights of party stakeholders and members to express grievances democratically. “Peaceful protests are a legitimate feature of civic engagement, and we commend those who have conducted themselves calmly and orderly,” he stated.

He, however, said that the selection of cabinet members for the 20 LGs and 37 LCDAs would follow the laid-down rules and the internal party guidelines and the proposition by local leadership of the party after due consultations.

He said, “Please note that the party at the state level only plays an advisory role. The party hereby vehemently denies any allegation to impose nomination on any local government.

“We want to advise interested members to approach their local leadership, who are the custodians of the power to nominate.

“We remain committed to constructive dialogue to review concerns and disputes to ensure fair outcomes in line with party values.

“We appeal for constructive participation and plead with the protesters to channel their concerns through official party organs.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Obi denies seeking Bwala’s support for 2023 campaign

Published

on

Former Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, on Friday dismissed allegations by President Bola Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala, that he sought to recruit him into his 2023 presidential election campaign.

Obi said the accusation did not merit a response, insisting he had no dealings with Bwala and would not engage in what he described as “transactional politics.”

The former Anambra State governor made the clarification in a statement issued in Abuja by his media aide, Ibrahim Umar, amid growing exchanges between political actors over events surrounding the 2023 general election.

The statement read, “Normally, we would not dignify Bwala’s baseless accusations with a reply, given his well-documented history of dishonesty. However, we feel it is necessary to address this matter for the benefit of the public, who may be misled.

“Obi has made it clear that he excludes individuals like Bwala from his political activities and any form of transactional politics that sustain people like him in political circles. The Obi that Nigerians know and appreciate will never engage in such practices. He would rather allocate resources to provide desks for children in Bwala’s village than pay him to concoct falsehoods for public consumption.

“Obi’s approach is rooted in the pursuit of good governance and the creation of a better society for all. He does not pay people to promote a cause; instead, he invites them to join him in believing in a shared vision. For the umpteenth time, we call on Bwala and others like him to count Obi out of their greed, repent, and join us in the quest for a new Nigeria”

The rebuttal follows recent claims by Bwala that Obi had attempted to enlist him in the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential campaign.

See also  PDP rejects Lamido’s call for NWC dissolution

Speaking in an interview with On-Air Personality Daddy Freeze, Bwala said the request was conveyed through former President Olusegun Obasanjo during a meeting in London.

According to Bwala, the conversation occurred while Obasanjo was at the Hilton Hotel with Obi’s running mate, Yusuf Datti Baba-Ahmed, and other political stakeholders.

Bwala said that despite his respect for Obasanjo, he declined the overture. He also claimed that Ambassador Amuchi Osuk had been appointed by Obi’s team to coordinate early campaign activities.

The presidential aide further addressed speculation surrounding his political stance at the time, noting that some critics assumed he would naturally support a Christian candidate instead of the Muslim-Muslim ticket that eventually emerged under the ruling All Progressives Congress.

The exchange adds to the ongoing political sparring between figures aligned with the current administration and opposition actors following the 2023 elections.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Politics

Court bars Aiyedatiwa from contesting 2028 gov election, see why

Published

on

The Federal High Court sitting in Akure, Ondo State capital, on Thursday stopped the purported ambition of Governor Lucky Aiyedatiwa to contest for a second term in office in 2028.

A chieftain of the All Progressives Congress in the state, Dr Akin Egbuwalo, had filed a suit at the court seeking the interpretation of Section 137(3) of the Constitution regarding the eligibility of Aiyedatiwa and his deputy, Dr Olayide Adelami, to contest for a second term.

The suit had the Independent National Electoral Commission, the Ondo State Attorney General, the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Aiyedatiwa, Adelami, and the APC as defendants.

In a judgment delivered by Justice Toyin Adegoke, the court held that Aiyedatiwa would be ineligible to stand for election in 2028, having been sworn in on December 27, 2023, to complete the tenure of the late Governor Rotimi Akeredolu, and subsequently inaugurated on February 24, 2025, after winning the November 16, 2024, governorship election.

The judge declared that the 1999 Constitution, as amended, did not provide for a situation where an elected president, vice president, governor, or deputy would serve more than eight years in office, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Marwa v. Nyako.

The court ruled that the suit was not speculative or academic, emphasising that it had inherent jurisdiction to interpret any section of the constitution, being a creation of law and duty-bound to uphold it at all times.

Justice Adegoke also held that the processes of the third to fifth defendants were deemed abandoned, having failed to participate during the hearing of the suit, and that only the processes of the plaintiff and first and second defendants would be considered.

See also  Post-NEC meetings: APC, PDP set stage for epic 2027 face-off

“If the third defendant is allowed to contest and serve another four years, that will be against the position of the law in Marwa v. Nyako, where the Supreme Court held that a president or governor cannot serve beyond eight years,” the court ruled.

The court’s verdict also stated that it found “merit in the case of the plaintiff and consequently granted all the reliefs sought.”

The PUNCH reported that on Monday, March 9, 2026, the Court of Appeal in Abuja dismissed an appeal filed by Aiyedatiwa, challenging a ruling of the Akure Federal High Court in the suit questioning his eligibility to contest the next governorship election in the state.

In a unanimous judgment delivered by a three-member panel, the appellate court held that the trial court properly exercised its discretion when it granted an application by the plaintiff, Dr Egbuwalo, to amend his originating summons in the case.

Justice Uchechukwu Onyemenam, who read the lead judgment, ruled that Aiyedatiwa failed to show that the Federal High Court’s decision to allow the amendment occasioned any miscarriage of justice or denied him the right to a fair hearing.

Aiyedatiwa was first sworn in as governor on December 27, 2023, after the late Governor Rotimi Akeredolu died.

He was again sworn in as governor on February 24, 2025, having won the November governorship election in the state.

In his first anniversary interview, Aiyedatiwa stressed that only the Supreme Court would stop him from re-contesting the governorship in 2028.

With the defeat in the Federal High Court, Akure, the governor may consider an appeal of the judgment.

See also  SAN joins Benue gov race, plans unseating Alia

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Politics

Appeal Court fallout: Makinde, Bala split over Wike peace deal

Published

on

In a development likely to shape the future of the Peoples Democratic Party ahead of the 2027 elections, Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, and the party’s Board of Trustees have endorsed a Court of Appeal-backed reconciliation accord with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike’s camp.

Senior party leaders, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to comment on the issue, revealed that the Chairman of the PDP Governors Forum, Bauchi State Governor Senator Bala, rejected the reconciliation initiative, insisting he could not work with the Wike camp.

Earlier, the PDP governors had endorsed the Ibadan convention held on November 15, which elected Tanimu Turaki (SAN) and other members of the National Working Committee for a four-year term.

They also oversaw the handover of leadership from former Acting National Chairman, Umar Damagum, to Turaki before Damagum’s tenure ended on December 9, 2025.

However, a faction loyal to Wike formed a 13-member Caretaker Committee on December 8, 2025, appointing Mohammed Abdulrahman as Acting National Chairman and Senator Samuel Anyanwu as Acting National Secretary, among others, with a 60-day mandate.

Attempts by both the Wike-aligned faction and the governors’ group to hold meetings at the PDP National Secretariat in Wadata Plaza on November 18, 2025, descended into chaos, resulting in disorder and physical confrontations.

The Nigeria Police Force subsequently sealed the secretariat, which has remained closed ever since.

Both factions then sought recognition from the Independent National Electoral Commission, but the commission declined to recognise either group, triggering prolonged legal disputes as preparations for the 2027 general elections gained momentum.

On February 12, the Court of Appeal heard all consolidated cases related to the PDP leadership crisis, delivering its judgment on March 9.

In a ruling by a panel led by Justice Mohammed Danjuma, the court upheld the Federal High Court of Abuja’s earlier decision, which found that the processes that produced the governors-backed Ibadan National Convention of November 15–16, 2025, violated the Electoral Act, the Nigerian Constitution and the PDP Constitution.

Consequently, the appellate court nullified the convention’s outcome, declaring the election of Turaki and other members of the NWC invalid.

Also, Justice Biobele Georgewill, leading a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal sitting in Ibadan, Oyo State, on Wednesday, granted all parties involved in the PDP elective convention case permission to pursue a settlement.

The matter was adjourned sine die, based on the agreement of the counsel for both sides to proceed with the settlement process.

Justice Georgewill advised the lawyers representing all parties to prioritise a peaceful resolution in the best interest of the party.

Previously, Justice Ladiran Akintola of the Oyo State High Court in Ibadan had validated the PDP convention held in Ibadan.

The case was filed by Folahan Adelabi and was represented byMusibau Adetunmbi (SAN).

At Wednesday’s sitting, Justice Georgewill also urged the parties to be mindful of INEC’s timetable ahead of the 2027 general elections.

He said, “The Court has granted leave for settlement in this matter. Also, the case has been adjourned sine die in order to give all the parties the opportunity to meet, either individually or collectively, on how to resolve the case pending before the Appellate Court peacefully.

“All the parties involved should be mindful of the election timetable as released by INEC. The counsel of the various parties being represented here are in the best position to advise the parties they are representing.

“The court should be duly informed in writing of the decision reached, whether they agreed or disagreed on the terms of settlement. To this end, all the pending Motions on Notice in this case have been adjourned sine die.”

Meanwhile, all the lawyers, in their submissions, expressed agreement with the court’s stance on the matter.

Speaking to reporters, Sunday Ibrahim (SAN), representing the other counsel, said the parties have indicated their readiness to reach a settlement.

“On that note, we make no further comment because the same may prejudice the envisioned settlement. The parties involved, during their meetings on settlement, may discuss about the INEC timetable and the rest,” he added.

Party sources with knowledge of the matter disclosed that Makinde and the expanded BoT meeting agreed that both factions should appoint legal teams and senior party leaders to draft the terms of the reconciliation accord and submit them to the Court of Appeal for approval.

He stated, “We have made some progress. Yesterday (Tuesday), after the BoT meeting ended at night, members and leaders of the party, especially the governors and other stakeholders, reconvened around 11pm and had a moment-of-truth conversation among themselves. They told each other the truth about how to preserve the party.

See also  Rising opposition attacks spark concerns ahead of 2027 elections

“While Governor Makinde and other critical stakeholders hoped for reconciliation, Governor Bala seems uninterested in reconciling with the Wike-aligned camp. He expressed his view that they are not the kind of people he wants to work with. Others are still trying to persuade him to see the importance of reconciliation.

“That is why he (Bala) did not attend today’s (Wednesday) expanded BoT meeting. This is because he is aware of the disposition of the BoT members, Governor Makinde and others, who support reconciliation with Wike’s group. So, Governor Bala did not show up because he is not interested in reconciling with the Wike camp for now.”

The source stated that the committee would determine the allocation of positions in the NWC and outline the process for implementation.

He added, “Of course, the BoT forged ahead. Makinde, with the support of other stakeholders in the expanded BoT meeting, agreed on the need for genuine reconciliation with the other party. They recommended that to avoid any breaches of the agreement, both sides should constitute a committee of members, including legal experts and individuals knowledgeable in the law to draft an agreement.

“Whatever understanding and accord the committee reaches will then be submitted to the Court of Appeal. Recall that the Appeal Court in Ibadan had ruled that the parties should seek an out-of-court settlement. The court will review the agreement and rule on it to ensure it is binding on all members.

“Basically, that is the situation for now. In the coming days, members of this committee will be fully unveiled. They will meet to finalise details, agree on positions, and determine how the party will move forward. Soon, the public will see how this process unfolds.”

Another source said the party leaders were hopeful that the Bauchi State Governor would back the reconciliation process and remain in the party.

He stated, “The expanded BoT, including members of the National Working Committee, NEC members, state chairmen, and Governor Makinde have agreed on the need to reconcile both camps. They are working towards reconciliation, but based on what we have gathered and observed, the Governor of Bauchi State, Bala Mohammed, has expressed reservations about the process.

“He is not keen on reconciling with the Wike group, perhaps because of events that occurred during the crisis. Party members are still trying to persuade him to see the importance of reconciliation. We hope and pray that he reconciles and does not withdraw because of this. Some people are still engaging with him, and as we know, 24 hours is a long time in politics — anything can happen. They are working to convince him to join the other party members in resolving all outstanding issues.

“A committee will be set up to draft an agreement. This agreement will address the process, whether through a caretaker committee or a convention, and outline who gets which positions: chairman, secretary, organising secretary and ensure the protection of party staff. It will also address the party’s fielding of candidates in all positions. Once finalised, the agreement will be submitted to the court to make it binding on all members.”

BoT seeks reconciliation

Meanwhile, the PDP Board of Trustees has moved to reconcile aggrieved stakeholders after the recent Court of Appeal ruling that invalidated the party’s November 2025 National Convention.

PDP BoT Chairman, Adolphus Wabara, who stated this on Wednesday after the expanded Trustees meeting in Abuja, also announced the constitution of a special committee to engage legal teams and party leaders in resolving the leadership crisis ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Reacting to the judgment, the PDP BoT stated that while it awaited advice from the party’s lawyers, it would adopt the Appeal Court Ibadan ruling to explore alternative dispute resolution in addressing all issues.

The communique. read by Wabara, stated, “The BoT is disturbed by the avoidable internal leadership disputes and wranglings leading to damaging litigations with consequential detrimental effect on the unity and smooth running of the PDP as the major opposition party in the country.

“The Board, however, acknowledges and resolves to explore the window provided by the Court of Appeal, Ibadan Division, for reconciliation within the party.

“The BoT is conscious of the interest and aspiration of our members who are desirous of contesting various positions in the 2027 general elections. Conscious of the onus on the BoT as the conscience and third highest leadership organ of the party, the Board is resolved to take immediate steps to reconcile all stakeholders, put an end to all disputes and restore the party to good political health, particularly to enable the PDP field candidates in the 2027 general elections.

See also  No godfathers, budget padding, ADC pledges to redesign governance

“The BoT constitutes a special committee to immediately interface with the legal teams and any other stakeholders to foster reconciliation within the party.”

The BoT noted that the remarkable increase in membership, despite existing challenges, highlighted the PDP’s position as the preferred party for the majority of Nigerians ahead of the 2027 general elections.

The communique read in part, “The BoT therefore calls on all leaders and members of our party to jettison all personal and group interests and come together as one family in the overall interest of our party and the wellbeing of millions of Nigerians whose hope is anchored on the PDP.

“The BoT commends the efforts of our governors; Governor Bala Mohammed of Bauchi State and Governor Seyi Makinde of Oyo State for their commitment and steadfastness towards the party and the wellbeing of all Nigerians.

“The BoT, pursuant to Section 32 of the Constitution of the PDP (as amended in 2017), unanimously approved the appointment of Dr. Babangida Aliyu as the Secretary of the Board.

“The BoT urges Nigerians not to be dispirited but remain hopeful as the PDP works hard in repositioning itself for the task of salvaging our nation from the stranglehold of the All Progressives Congress.”

Signaling their readiness for reconciliation, the governors-backed faction, through its National Secretary, Taofeek Arapaja, announced the postponement of the Caucus and National Executive meeting originally scheduled for Thursday (today).

The statement read, “In furtherance of the decision of the Board of Trustees of the Peoples Democratic Party, in pursuit of reconciliation within the party, we announce the postponement of the meetings of the National Caucus, Board of Trustees, and National Executive Committee of our party earlier scheduled for this week until further notice.

“This decision is to demonstrate utmost good faith in the court-advised reconciliation process.

“We apologise for any inconvenience this postponement may cause.”

In response to the olive branch extended by the Governors camp, Wike, during his group’s National Excutive Committee meeting in Abuja on Wednesday, stated that they were prepared for reconciliation.

He stated, “PDP will never die. There comes a time that you have crises, but those grains are for you to put yourself in order. Life is in stages. For me, what is happening is a natural process that we must pass through as humans. We are for reconciliation, but genuine reconciliation.

“Minority leader, when you are talking about reconciliation, come with your terms of reconciliation, so that we will know. Concrete proposal, not like the last time you came to me and before I knew it, you were in Ibadan for the convention. I don’t like those who go to negotiate at night and come out to shout in the day. Let those coming for peace come in the daytime and not at nighttime,” he said.

Wike also rejected accusations that his role in the All Progressives Congress-led federal administration had compromised his loyalty to the PDP.

“It was as if I was the cause of the problem because I am working in an APC administration, but all the ones who accused me are today in APC, and me that they accused has not left the PDP,” he said.

He further insisted that the party’s planned national convention would go ahead as scheduled (March 29 and 30), dismissing suggestions that another caretaker committee should be constituted to accommodate dissenting members.

“The party is working hard for the convention to hold. They have paid the necessary fees. They have secured the venue. So, let nobody bring another suggestion that we should form another caretaker committee. I won’t accept that. Convention must hold and we will allow everybody to participate,” Wike said.

Earlier, Senate Minority Whip, Senator Abba Moro, appealed for compromise among the competing factions, emphasising the need to protect the party’s future.

“I bring you solidarity from the National Assembly. I want to reiterate very emphatically here that the NASS caucus of our great party has always been in the forefront of having a united PDP,” Moro said.

He disclosed that he had earlier met with the faction led by Tanimu Turaki in an effort to find common ground.

“Crisis has rocked the PDP over some time and the NASS caucus under my leadership and Hon. Kingsley Chinda resolved that we must provide a platform so that we can act as one,” he said.

Moro also urged party members to make sacrifices in order to preserve the party.

“Whether I contest election in 2027 or not, the survival of PDP is paramount to me. I cannot abandon it. Everybody should accept some level of sacrifices,” he added.

See also  Coalition demands Atiku and Obi’s full membership on 2027 Presidency

In his remarks, the House of Representatives Minority Leader, Kingsley Chinda, described the Court of Appeal judgment as a positive development for both the party and the country’s democratic system.

“For us, we are happy that the judgment of Monday is not just for PDP but for democracy in the country,” Chinda said.

He added that the ruling had restored confidence in the party’s future.

“You have seen the exodus of our members in the past just because of the fear of the viability of the platform, but Monday’s judgment has laid all that to rest. We want to assure you that within a short time in the House of Representatives, you will see people defecting to the PDP,” he declared.

Chinda, however, stressed that genuine peace must be built on justice.

“Yes, we crave for peace, but whoever seeks peace must also seek justice. That is the only thing that can give us sustained peace,” he said.

Earlier in his remarks, the Acting Chairman of the Wike-backed National Caretaker Working Committee, Abdulrahman Mohammed, said Nigerians were looking to the opposition party to provide credible leadership and a clear alternative vision for governance.

“The Nigerian people are watching us closely. They expect our party to continue to provide responsible leadership, credible opposition, and a clear alternative vision for governance and national development,” Mohammed said.

He called on members of the NEC to approach deliberations with unity and a strong sense of responsibility.

“As we deliberate in this meeting today (Wednesday), I urge all of us to approach our discussions with maturity, unity of purpose, and a strong sense of responsibility toward the future of our great party and our country,” he said.

Mohammed added that the PDP must demonstrate discipline and organization as it prepares for future political contests.

“The PDP must continue to demonstrate that it is not only the largest political party in Africa but also the most organized, disciplined, and democratic,” he added.

He also used the occasion to address recent leadership disputes within the party, saying court rulings had affirmed the legitimacy of the current leadership structure.

According to him, judgments by the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal reaffirmed the supremacy of the rule of law and the need for political actors to operate within the provisions of the law and party constitution.

“Recent developments within our party and the judgments delivered by the courts have once again reaffirmed the supremacy of the rule of law and the necessity for all political actors to operate strictly within the provisions of both the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Constitution of our great party,” he said.

He congratulated party members nationwide on what he described as judicial victories and said the rulings underscored the importance of due process.

Mohammed said the judgments also confirmed the authenticity of the party’s current leadership.

“More importantly, these judicial pronouncements have clearly made it abundantly clear that the only authentic leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party remains the leadership structure as presently constituted, with my good self serving as the duly recognised National Chairman of the party, working in collaboration with our able Acting National Secretary, Anyanwu, and other members of the National Working Committee,” he said.

He also dismissed claims that the courts upheld the suspension of Acting National Secretary, Samuel Anyanwu, describing such reports as false.

“Let me state this clearly, categorically, and without any ambiguity before this highest decision-making body of our party. Such a matter was never entertained by either the Federal High Court or the Court of Appeal,” Mohammed said.

He accused some individuals of spreading misinformation to mislead party members and the public.

“We therefore wish to use this opportunity to inform our esteemed members across the federation and indeed the general public that the claim that the courts upheld the suspension of our Acting National Secretary is completely false, misleading and a deliberate attempt to create confusion within our party,” he said.

He added, “The records of the courts are very clear, and anyone who takes the time to read the judgments will easily confirm that no such issue was determined by the Federal High Court or the Court of Appeal.”

He urged party members to remain calm and united, stressing that the PDP would continue to strengthen its internal structures and democratic values.

Continue Reading

Trending