Connect with us

News

Presidential order fails to curb soaring drug prices

Published

on

Despite President Bola Tinubu’s executive order in June 2024 aimed at reducing drug costs by abolishing tariffs, excise duties, and Value Added Tax on pharmaceutical machinery and raw materials, Nigeria continues to battle soaring medication prices.

The intended policy, designed to ease the financial burden on patients, remains largely unenforced, leading to no relief for consumers or manufacturers.

The Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Muhammad Pate, on June 28, 2024, announced on X that President Bola Tinubu signed an Executive Order aiming to increase local production of healthcare products

Pate noted that the order introduces zero tariffs, excise duties and VAT on specified machinery, equipment and raw materials, aiming to reduce production costs and enhance our local manufacturers’ competitiveness.

“Specified items include Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients, excipients, other essential raw materials required for manufacturing of crucial health products like drugs, syringes and needles, Long-lasting Insecticidal Nets and Rapid Diagnostic Kits, among others.

“The Order also provides for establishing market shaping mechanisms such as framework contracts and volume guarantees, to encourage local manufacturers.

“The Order mandates collaboration between the Ministers of Health, Finance and Industry, Trade and Investment to develop a Harmonised Implementation Framework, expediting regulatory approvals and reducing bottlenecks,” Pate wrote.

The minister noted that agencies, including the Nigeria Customs Service, the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control, Standards Organisation of Nigeria, and the Federal Inland Revenue Service, would ensure swift implementation, with special waivers and exemptions effective for two years.

A release issued by the Nigeria Customs Service on March 26, 2025, stated that the agency had commenced the implementation of the executive order.

The release, signed by the National Public Relations Officer of the Service, Abdullahi Maiwada, noted,” Drawing from Presidential directives aimed at enhancing local manufacturing of healthcare products, reducing the costs of medical equipment and consumables, as well as stimulating local investments, the Nigeria Customs Service (NCS) is pleased to announce that His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, through the Honourable Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Olawale Edun, has approved the comprehensive guidelines to actualise these objectives.

“Consequently, critical raw materials essential for the production of pharmaceutical products will be exempted from import duty and Value Added Tax (VAT) for a period of two years. This exemption covers Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), excipients, and other vital raw materials required for manufacturing essential medicines, Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs), Rapid Diagnostic Kits, reagents, and packaging materials.

“To ensure that these fiscal incentives are fully utilised, eligibility is limited to manufacturers of pharmaceutical products recognised by the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, provided they possess a valid Tax Identification Number (TIN). This measure ensures that the benefits directly support legitimate manufacturers committed to strengthening Nigeria’s healthcare infrastructure.”

Higher prices

However, new data show that drug prices in Nigeria have surged alarmingly despite government promises of relief. For most Nigerians, relief remains painfully out of reach. Instead of dropping, many essential medicines have climbed between 30 per cent and 100 per cent in just 14 months, piling more pressure on patients already struggling with the rising cost of living.

Market surveys conducted by The PUNCH comparing drug prices between June 2024, when the executive order was signed, and August 2025, revealed that drug prices have continued to soar, with several life-saving medications recording steep hikes with only a few exceptions.

The impact is particularly stark for chronic disease patients. Insulin, for instance, rose by 29 per cent from N14,000 in June 2024 to N18,000 in August 2025, while a glucometer spiked 41 per cent from N20,500 to N29,000.

For hypertension patients, prescriptions are no less costly. Metformin increased by 30 per cent, moving from N500 to N650, while amlodipine climbed 33 per cent, rising from N1,800 to N2,400. Exforge, another hypertension drug, soared 83 per cent from N32,800 to N60,000.

The situation is dire for malaria treatment as drug prices have nearly doubled. Coartem, a widely used antimalarial, jumped 124 per cent from N3,800 to N8,500, while Artesunate injection climbed 56 per cent from N1,600 to N2,500. The price of the Lokmal tablet rose from N1,200 last year to N2,450 now, which is a 104.2 per cent increase.

Only a handful of medicines became cheaper. Augmentin dropped by 24 per cent, from N18,500 in June 2024 to N14,000 in August 2025. The Ventolin inhaler also fell by 12 per cent, from N8,500 to N7,500.

Still, these are rare cases in a market dominated by rising drug prices. The ineffectiveness of fully operationalising the policy has left Nigerians with little respite from crippling medication costs.

Blame on policy

Stakeholders attribute the persistent drug price hikes to the non-implementation or slow roll-out of the executive order, coupled with Nigeria’s heavy reliance on imports, high foreign exchange rates, rising energy costs, and other structural inefficiencies in the healthcare supply chain.

Speaking with our correspondent, the National President of the Association of Community Pharmacists of Nigeria, Ambrose Ezeh, said the executive order has not been implemented.

“Have we implemented (the executive order)? If the order is not implemented, then the status quo remains. Even if they are implemented or not, most of the drugs, 75 per cent of the drugs that we use in this country, are imported.

“The foreign exchange is at a high rate. If the forex is reduced, they (drugs) would reduce. If they are importing the raw material, they are importing everything; energy is high, and other things are high. There is no way it will not affect the medicines that are being sold in the country, whether you are producing locally you are importing from outside. The executive order has not been implemented,” Ezeh stated.

Meanwhile, the ACPN chairman of the Federal Capital Territory, Olatunji Aloba, explained that while some level of implementation was already being felt in the pharmaceutical sector, the full effect was yet to be realised.

He noted that drug importation under the new policy was already showing signs of change, with prices of some medications beginning to decrease. However, he stressed that the impact was uneven, depending on the timing of importation and the type of drugs involved.

See also  30,000 Fulani militants fuelling Nigeria’s insecurity – Read details of US report

“There are some drugs that are coming down in prices. Some are actually crashing. But those that were already in circulation before the policy was declared still maintain their old prices. It is new transactions and new importations that are beginning to reflect the order,” he said.

According to him, the drugs currently experiencing price reductions are mostly prescription-only medicines and some supplements.

He added that availability played a role in these changes, adding that when certain drugs go out of stock and later return to the market, they often reflect the new pricing system.

“The pricing of drugs is mainly determined by how much we get them. If we get the drugs at reduced rates, the costs from the shelves would be reduced, but if we get them at high rates, the prices would reflect that we sell as well.

“Also, this is determined by forex and cost factors. If I get raw materials at N15,000 and end up producing at the same N15,000, I will still want to maximise profit. Prices will only begin to crash gradually when subsequent supplies reflect better margins,” he said.

Aloba emphasised that the implementation of the executive order was ongoing but remained a gradual process.

He, however, expressed hope that with time, competition and continued policy enforcement would force prices down.

“You can’t always win it all. But when competition comes in, people will be forced to cut prices. It is a gradual process, but eventually, things will fall into place,” he concluded.

Another Community Pharmacist in Abuja, who spoke on condition of anonymity, explained that drug prices had risen mainly because local production had declined, forcing manufacturers to rely on imported medications, which are affected by the dollar rate.

She also noted that high demand, especially during the rainy season, for drugs like anti-malarial medications, pushes prices up, often leading to stock shortages.

“Most manufacturers and distributors depend on imported medications. Most times, they claim that because of the dollar rate and all of that, it affects the prices of medication. Another factor influencing drug prices is the supply. Especially this rainy season, you have a lot of demand for anti-malarial because of mosquito infestation. The fact that a lot of people are looking for anti-malarial drugs influences the drug prices negatively,” she said.

Regarding the Federal Government’s executive order to reduce drug costs and boost local production, she believes it has largely been ineffective in practice.

“I still believe the executive order is just on paper. In reality, none of those things have been implemented. When they say there’s an executive order, in what way? How have they been able to issue that order to reduce drug costs or even boost local production? We have Nigerian companies, yet their drugs keep increasing in terms of price.

“To be honest, it’s just on paper. It hasn’t been fully reflected in today’s market,” she stated.

The President of the Nigerian Medical Association, Prof. Bala Audu, said patients and doctors alike were still burdened by high drug prices because the executive order on medicines had not been fully implemented.

“To be honest, the immediate and long-term solution to the issue of high prices of drugs is for the government and the authorities to act and ensure that the executive order is fully implemented to ease the burden on Nigerians,” he said.

The President of the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors, Dr. Tope Osundara, said the reasons why drug prices were still high despite the executive order were mainly because the country lacked enough pharmaceutical companies to produce essential medicines.

He added that existing capacity could not meet demand, while most patients paid directly for drugs without health insurance, making affordability difficult.

“We do not have enough pharmaceutical companies to produce some of the essential drugs; the ones that we have are insufficient to take care of the needs of the people. Aside from that, out-of-pocket payment is also part of the problem we are having. So if there is financial security in terms of health insurance, people will be able to afford, even if it is foreign or locally made drugs. So out-of-pocket payment is something the government should look into so that they will mitigate against this, and we have patients who will be able to afford whatever the doctor prescribes.

“The reason the impact of the executive order signed by President Tinubu has not been felt by patients is that even for some of the drugs which prices are coming down, they are still not affordable for the people. People are still coping with how to survive and how to live daily, even without drugs.

“It’s becoming very difficult to eat a proper meal. So, how will someone who lives below $1 a day cope? We really need to do better to improve the economy,  the livelihood of the people, and significantly bring down these prices of drugs so that people will be able to afford them,” Dr. Osundara said.

The NARD president recommended that the government improve healthcare financing and make health insurance more accessible.

He stressed that without stronger healthcare financing and better economic conditions, drug prices will remain out of reach for many Nigerians

“If the government will be truthful and kind enough, they should go back to the Abuja Declaration that states that 15 per cent of the annual budget should go to health, both at the Federal Government level, and the state level.

“The government should fund some of the drug-producing companies so that whatever they are producing will be affordable to the patients, especially for essential and over-the-counter drugs,” he added.

Medications beyond reach

While there is optimism that the comprehensive implementation of the executive order will eventually drive down costs, patients battling chronic illnesses remain frustrated, saying relief is out of reach.

The Chairman of the Diabetes Association of Nigeria, Lagos State chapter, Abdulwahab Dauda, emphatically said diabetes drugs were not dropping in prices.

See also  32 governors, 8,450 delegates arrive Abuja for APC convention

“Some people who used to give us free medications have even reduced the quantities of drugs they give. The economy is biting hard on diabetes patients; our drugs are costly. Many of us are struggling to afford our drugs.

“We are yet to see the effects of the executive order. Last year, we wrote to the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare about the high price of insulin, but to date, the price of insulin has not come down. Insulin is sold for N20,000 now; you will only be lucky to see it at N18,000 in some places.

“When we wrote to the ministry, we complained that the price of insulin moved from N4,000 to N12,000. But right now, it’s between N18,000 and N20,000. Many of our members cannot afford it; they would have to consider feeding, accommodation, and other things. It’s really a tough time for many diabetes patients, not just in Lagos, but in Nigeria.”

A Lagos resident, Mrs. Idowu Abi, recalled how treating a simple case of malaria drained her pocket just two weeks ago.

“Last year, I spent less than N10,000 to treat malaria. But this time, the test alone cost me N3,000, while the injections and drugs went over N16,000. And I still had to feed well during treatment,” she said.

“It’s not easy. Medicines are expensive, food is costly, and the little I make as a petty trader is barely enough to survive,” she lamented.

Mr. Endurance Amogi, who visited Abuja in June, said he was shocked when a medication for catarrh that once cost N4,000 was sold for N24,000.

“I could afford it, but what about those who cannot? With the hike in medication prices, many people may be unable to get the treatment they need. At this rate, they should make health insurance compulsory for every Nigerian,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Executive Secretary of the Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Group of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Frank Muonemeh, has warned that the recently introduced mandatory payment of four per cent Free-on-Board value on imports could wipe out the benefits of the Federal Government’s zero-tariff policy on pharmaceutical raw materials.

Muonemeh, who spoke with The PUNCH, said the recently introduced policy had already begun to erode the modest gains made in stabilising the prices of medicines over the past five months.

He demanded that food and pharmaceuticals should be exempted from the four per cent FOB.

While he noted that the zero-tariff policy stabilised the cost of drugs in the past five months, he warned that the consequences of the recently introduced four per cent FOB may be seen in an increase in the price of drugs next year.

He urged the government to exempt the pharmaceutical and food sectors from the FOB levy because of their critical role in public welfare.

Muonemeh said, “They should not use one hand to give and another to take back. The pharmaceutical and food sectors are basic life-support systems. Applying FOB on them is counterproductive and makes Nigerians pay more for essential goods.

“The four per cent FOB charge nullifies whatever the government claims to have given us through zero tariff. Before now, companies paid five per cent duty. Now, with this new charge, whatever gains we enjoyed in the last five months have been eroded.

“The policy gave manufacturers confidence and prevented medicine prices from overshooting. Ordinarily, with current inflation, energy costs and interest rates, prices should have escalated. But because of faith in the zero-tariff policy, companies stabilised prices. With the FOB charge, however, we may see sharp increases.”

He said the benefits of the zero-duty regime, which ran between March and August, were set to reflect fully on market prices due to the long procurement and planning cycles in the industry, but may be slowed down with what he described as a policy flip or somersault.

Muonemeh further argued that policy inconsistencies threaten the government’s vision of unlocking the healthcare value chain.

According to him, if maintained, the levy will force companies to factor the additional cost into their 2025 business plans, undermining growth, discouraging investment and pushing medicine prices beyond the reach of ordinary Nigerians.

“Policies cannot be done in isolation. The Minister of Finance is running one thing, and another ministry is running another. These flips or somersaults affect not just pharmaceuticals but the entire economy. There is an urgent need for policy harmonisation,” he said.

State residents lament

A nationwide investigation revealed that soaring medication prices are taking a heavy toll on citizens.

Following the development, it was also learnt that poor Nigerians had resorted to local herbs and self-medication for treatment.

In Gombe, residents expressed frustration over the rising cost of essential medicines.

Mallam Ibrahim Adamu, a father of three from Tumfure, said he had not noticed any reduction in prices despite the directive.

“In fact, drugs have become more expensive. Common painkillers that we used to buy for N300 are now over N1,500, depending on the type. For antibiotics, the price is almost double,” he lamented.

Fatima Sambo, a petty trader at Pantami Market, said, “My husband is diabetic, and the cost of his insulin has gone up. Sometimes we are forced to buy half of the prescription because we cannot afford the full dose,” she said.

In Plateau State, a cross-section of the residents said the directive had little or no impact on the prices of drugs in the state.

Mohammed Abubakar, a resident of Bukuru community in Jos South Local Government Area, said,  “The pronouncement by the government on drug price reduction is only on paper because we have not seen any positive change to that effect.

“Instead, what we see is rather an increment in their prices by retailers. Today, a genuine malaria drug goes for as much as N3,000. This is a common illness which could easily be treated with just N300 or N400 before.”

Mrs. Grace Jonathan, a resident of Gada Biu community in Jos, and Bello Saidu, who reside in the Rayfield axis, echoed Abubakar’s sentiments, describing the situation as “really unbearable for the average Nigerian.”

“Many lives have been lost because those in need could not afford it at the time they needed it,” Jonathan said.

See also  UPDATED: ECOWAS declares state of emergency in West Africa

Residents of Adamawa noted that malaria drugs had become the most expensive, driven by the rising cases of the illness in the state.

A resident of Shagari quarters, Mariam Abubakar, said she totally depended on traditional herbs for her treatment and that of her children.

“Last week, my youngest was having malaria fever, so I went to a pharmacy to buy malaria drugs. I was charged N13,800 for two packs of drugs. Where will I get that money? My salary is only N28,000.

“The governor must do something to save us, the poor, from the rising crisis of drugs in the state,” she said.

In Edo State, Mikiste Thomas said the cost of drugs, especially the ones he buys for his uncle for his prostate ailment, has become cheaper in Benin.

He said, “I have an uncle who uses Contiflo and Ciprofloxacin, and the prices have come down considerably. The drugs are used to control his prostate. I was involved in buying the drugs, and I found out recently that they are cheaper than they used to be.

“He gave me the former price, but I bought it cheaper in a reputable pharmacy in Benin City.

“For me, the government should encourage Pharmaceutical companies to go into large-scale production of prescription drugs for all ailments.”

Another Benin resident, Edosa Okunbo, said he has not noticed a drop in the prices of the drugs he uses

He said, “Antibiotics and painkillers are still very expensive in Benin. I am talking as a patient who is battling pneumonia and excessive pain. Drugs like Ampicillin, Ampiclox and Ciprotab have become very expensive. Also, prices of painkillers like Atrothec, Diclophenac are on the rise.

“The rise in prices of drugs may be due to sabotage by drug manufacturers and sellers. The government should set up a task force to check the activities of drug manufacturers and sellers.”

Yobe residents urged the Federal Government to ensure effective consumer protection and impose price ceilings on drugs at the retail level.

Musa Abubakar, a resident of Damaturu, expressed his frustration over the situation.

“The FG should ensure consumer protection is effective and put price ceilings on drugs down to the retail level,” he emphasised.

“Prices of drugs have remained the same, but the cost of living has increased,” he said. “Malaria, typhoid, and ulcer medications are just a few examples of the health conditions that have become unaffordable for many.”

Umar Geidam, a resident of Damaturu and a civil servant, highlighted the significant price increases of essential drugs, including malaria injections and ulcer medications.

“The government order on drug prices has not been effective due to a lack of enforcement,” he said.

In Jigawa, the rising drug costs have put a strain on people’s health and finances, limiting many from seeking timely medical care.

Musa Abdullahi, a trader from Dutse, said, “The free healthcare programme is helpful, but some medicines prescribed by doctors are not available in the government hospitals. We have to buy them at nearby shops where prices are very high.”

Fatima Ibrahim from Birnin Kudu added, “Malaria and typhoid medicines have become very expensive lately. Even though the state promotes free healthcare, we struggle to afford these essential drugs outside the hospital.

“The government should regulate private drug sellers strictly and ensure a consistent supply to public hospitals. That way, affordable medicine will reach the people.”

“We want government health centres to be stocked well, so we don’t have to pay high prices outside,” Musa Inusa, a resident of Dutse, said.

Residents also cited shortages and irregular supply of medicines in public hospitals, forcing them to rely on commercial chemists.

Residents across Nasarawa also decried the rising drug prices in the state.

A resident of Lafia, the Nasarawa State capital, Tanko Muhammad, told our correspondent that getting a good Malaria drug has become a difficult task in recent times, as the recommended ones are now sold between N3,000 to N5,000 in the state.

He narrated how he spent almost all his earnings in July just to acquire drugs and foot the medical bills of his nephew, who was diagnosed with malaria and typhoid fever.

“On this issue of high cost of drugs, I think that the government has to intervene because the situation is becoming unbearable. If I, who is gainfully employed, could be affected by skyrocketing prices, you can imagine what the low-income earners would be facing at the moment. So, I appeal that the government should assist us on this matter.”

In Kano State, Maryam Bala, a mother of three in Dorayi, said there had been no visible change in drug costs.

“Medicines are still very expensive. Families like ours are struggling to afford proper treatment. Nothing has really changed,” she lamented.

Another resident, Aliyu Usman, a civil servant, explained that he had been forced to ration prescriptions due to the persistent high cost.

“My wife is diabetic, and sometimes I have to choose between paying school fees and buying her drugs. The situation is terrible,” he said.

Also, Sokoto residents said the executive order had brought little or no relief, as prices of common prescriptions continued to skyrocket, making access to healthcare increasingly difficult for ordinary citizens.

Abubakar Musa, a civil servant in Sokoto metropolis, said he had not noticed any reduction in drug prices since the directive was announced.

“Honestly, medicines have only become more expensive. Just last week, I bought antibiotics for my child at nearly double the price I paid last year. The presidential order has not changed anything at the pharmacies we buy from,” he lamented.

Similarly, a student of Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Bashir Ibrahim, explained that the increase has discouraged many young people from seeking timely medical care.

“When we fall sick, we first try home remedies because drugs are just too expensive. Even basic pain relievers that used to be affordable are now costly. The government’s directive didn’t work because the market is controlled by middlemen and importers,” he stated.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  2027 battle: Rivers crisis escalates as top APC govs back Fubara

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  British singer, Rick Davies dead at 81

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  ‘If I don’t give you electricity, don’t vote for me again’ – ADC reminds Tinubu of failed promise

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  32 governors, 8,450 delegates arrive Abuja for APC convention

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  British singer, Rick Davies dead at 81

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  Ban on sale of sachet alcoholic drinks remains – NAFDAC

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending