Connect with us

Business

15% tariff: Nigerians to pay N1tn extra for petrol yearly

Published

on

Nigerians will pay an additional amount of about N1tn (N973.6bn) annually on petrol imports following the Federal Government’s planned introduction of a 15 per cent import tariff on Premium Motor Spirit (petrol).

According to a petrol import trend report obtained from the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, reviewed by The PUNCH on Tuesday, Nigeria imported an average of 26.75 million litres of petrol daily between January and September 2025.

At a projected import tariff rate of N99.72 per litre, as stated in the presidential approval letter for the 15% tariff, the amount that would be spent as tariff for the 26.75 million litres would be about  N2.67bn daily.

When computed over a full year, this adds up to a staggering N973.64bn, which Nigerians will ultimately bear through higher pump prices once the policy is implemented. This amount, while representing additional revenue for government coffers, will translate to a direct increase in fuel expenses for households, transporters, and businesses nationwide.

President Bola Tinubu’s approval of a 15 per cent import policy on PMS and diesel has stirred widespread concern across the oil and gas sector, with operators warning it could raise petrol prices, worsen inflation, and increase import costs, even as the government insists the policy aims to boost local refining and generate revenue.

The President’s approval was conveyed in a letter signed by his Private Secretary, Damilotun Aderemi, following a proposal submitted by the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji.

The proposal sought the application of a 15 per cent duty on the cost, insurance, and freight value of imported petrol and diesel to align import costs with domestic market realities.

Adedeji, in his memo to the President, explained that the measure formed part of ongoing fiscal and energy reforms designed to strengthen the naira-based oil economy, ensure price stability, and accelerate the nation’s transition toward local refining capacity in line with the administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda for energy security and economic sustainability.

He also advised the government to ensure transparency by creating a designated Federal Government revenue account managed by the Nigeria Revenue Service, with verification and clearance oversight by the NMDPRA.

“At current CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) levels, this represents an increment of approximately N99.72 per litre, which nudges imported landed costs towards local cost recovery without choking supply or inflating consumer prices beyond sustainable thresholds.

“The core objective of this initiative is to operationalise crude transactions in local currency, strengthen local refining capacity, and ensure a stable, affordable supply of petroleum products across Nigeria,” Adedeji stated.

The FIRS boss noted that the policy is not revenue-driven but corrective, introduced to align import costs with local production realities and prevent duty-free imports from undercutting domestic refineries that are just beginning to recover.

He argued that the new tariff framework would discourage duty-free fuel imports from undercutting domestic producers and foster a fair and competitive downstream environment. He also warned that the current misalignment between locally refined products and import parity pricing has created instability in the market.

“While domestic refining of petrol has begun to increase and diesel sufficiency has been achieved, price instability persists, partly due to the misalignment between local refiners and marketers,” he wrote. The new policy takes effect after a 30-day transition period expected to end on November 21, 2025.

See also  PENGASSAN Orders Shutdown Of Crude, Gas Supply To Dangote Refinery

Dissenting voices

In response to the development, dissenting voices from industry experts and petroleum marketers have continued to grow louder, with many questioning the timing and potential impact of the 15 per cent import tariff.

The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria on Tuesday expressed reservations over the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel, describing it as inconsistent with the spirit of market deregulation.

Speaking in an interview with our correspondent, the National Publicity Secretary of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, said independent marketers were not opposed to Tinubu’s directive but faulted the policy’s design, which he argued undermines the principles of a free and competitive market.

“Independent marketers don’t have any problem with the President’s directive, but the only issue is that because of policymakers, the policy doesn’t follow the spirit of deregulation,” Ukadike said.

“Once you liberalise the market and then start to favour a certain section of the industry against others, it means you are putting the cart before the horse. The liberalisation was meant to ensure a free market driven by a willing buyer, willing seller arrangement. The policy should not be an impediment for those who want to import to challenge the local industry.”

He urged the Federal Government to focus on incentivising local refineries rather than imposing tariffs on fuel imports, noting that such measures could distort competition and discourage private participation.

“The government should rather encourage local refineries by giving them crude and reducing taxes for local refiners so that they can lower their prices. The important thing is the price war between refineries and importers. One thing I know is that there is no way domestic products will be cheaper, and marketers will still decide to import. There is no need to put a tariff on importation because they would know importing is not lucrative and would source products locally. So we must do everything to boost our market and solve issues. The government has to allow domestic refiners and importers to compete without government-induced favouritism,” he advised.

According to Ukadike, the natural dynamics of market forces would make imports unattractive once local production becomes cheaper. “There is no need to put a tariff on importation because once domestic products are cheaper, marketers will naturally source locally. The government must allow domestic refiners and importers to compete freely without government-induced restrictions,” he explained.

He warned that any artificial increase in fuel prices would further drive inflation, especially ahead of the Yuletide season when demand for petrol typically rises.

“The most important element of market forces is a price drop. Any addition in pricing will lead to inflation, especially now that Christmas is approaching and more people will be travelling. There must be no shortage of products, and the government must ensure local refining, distribution, and collaboration with stakeholders are in full gear,” Ukadike added.

The Chief Executive Officer of PetroleumPrice.ng, Jeremiah Olatide, described the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a double-edged policy, one that could boost government revenue but also worsen the economic hardship faced by Nigerians.

See also  Gas firms supply 180bscf to power plants despite N2.7tn debt

Reacting to the development, the oil market analyst said the tariff would significantly impact fuel prices and inflation levels, especially as Nigerians continue to adjust to the effects of the fuel subsidy removal.

“Yes, that calculation is accurate,” he told The PUNCH in response to estimates showing Nigerians may pay nearly N1tn extra annually on petrol imports due to the new tariff. Although the figure can go higher because we are still in the current year, depending on landing costs, too.”

According to him, while the policy represents a strategic move to shore up revenue amid fiscal constraints, it comes at a difficult time for most Nigerians. “For me, it is a good thing that revenue will increase. It’s a smart way to generate income for the country, considering our current expenses and the need for multiple revenue streams.

“But the timing is not really good. Nigerians are still struggling to buy petrol at N800 or N900 per litre. Subsidy removal happened two years ago and has already taken a toll on households. Adding extra expenses through a tariff will hit them hard and definitely push up inflation,” he explained.

He also warned that a combination of the 15 per cent import duty and a proposed five per cent surcharge could further burden consumers and distort market stability.

He said, “The timing is not really good. Two years ago, the subsidy was removed. The effect has not reduced, and we are already facing another issue. The government also plans to begin a five per cent surcharge soon. All of these just make them an additional burden on Nigerians. The government has to be strategic in the rollout.

“I know they are trying to protect local refineries, but there are better policies and ways to support them without having to put more burden on Nigerians. The government could have prioritised a naira-for-crude deal instead.”

The energy expert further noted that the tariff would not necessarily halt fuel importation, as some traders might still find ways to bring in products despite the higher cost.

“I am so sure that some importers will still import. They will find ways to import, not minding the challenges. This policy will not ease out importation of products. Some importers will still look for ways to import, and all of that will still be added to the pump price. Nigerians are craving a price drop, but with these multiple taxes coming into play, that hope seems far away,” he lamented.

He urged the government to adopt policies that strengthen local refining and stabilise the upstream oil sector instead. “The right policy should be enhancing the naira for crude deals to all local refineries. All of them should take feedstock in naira. It would help them grow faster.

“The government should look into the upstream sector and make sure a production of three million barrels per day of crude is ensured. There will be stability with this. Patronage will also increase if prices drop. That’s the only way to achieve price stability and increase market confidence,” he said.

See also  OPay secures double honours at Tech Innovation Awards

Meanwhile, the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria earlier called for the resuscitation of the country’s refineries before December to avert possible fuel scarcity and price hikes during the festive season.

PETROAN President, Billy Gillis-Harry, described the tariff policy as a bold step toward protecting domestic refineries, stabilising the market, and promoting energy security. He, however, warned that if the measure was poorly implemented, it could cripple fuel importation and render many importers jobless, a situation he said would lead to fuel scarcity.

“NNPC must complete its partnership agreements quickly and start production at Nigeria’s refineries before December to avert any form of fuel scarcity or price hike during the Yuletide season,” he said.

Despite the additional costs Nigerians are expected to bear, the policy decision by the government has also attracted commendations from some stakeholders who view it as a bold step toward boosting revenue and encouraging local refining.

CPPE backs govt

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise threw its weight behind the Federal Government’s newly introduced 15 per cent import duty on refined petroleum products, describing it as a step toward reviving Nigeria’s industrial base and promoting economic self-sufficiency.

The private sector think tank said the measure represents a “strategic protectionist policy” designed to safeguard emerging domestic industries, including local refineries, while stimulating productivity, job creation, and foreign exchange savings.

In a statement signed by the Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, the CPPE noted that Nigeria’s excessive dependence on imports over the past decades had weakened its productive capacity, eroded competitiveness, and exposed the economy to external shocks.

It argued that sectors previously protected through calibrated policy interventions, such as cement, flour, and beverages, have recorded remarkable growth and value addition, proving that well-targeted protectionism can strengthen national industries.

The group clarified that its position does not support economic isolationism but a measured approach to industrial protection that helps domestic industries scale up and compete globally.

“Strategic protectionism is not about closing borders or creating monopolies,” CPPE said. “It is about building domestic capacity to engage the global economy from a position of strength.”

The organisation described the 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a progressive and corrective policy, adding that it could help level the playing field for domestic refiners such as the Dangote Refinery, NNPCL refineries, and modular plants currently struggling to compete with cheaper imports.

While commending the tariff, CPPE stressed that protection alone would not guarantee industrial success. It urged the government to complement the measure with fiscal incentives, low-cost financing, affordable and reliable energy supply, strategic infrastructure investment, and streamlined regulatory processes.

According to the centre, these support structures are critical to ensuring that protection leads to lower production costs, price stabilisation, and improved consumer welfare in the long run.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

EFCC Begins Probe Of Ex-NMDPRA Boss After Dangote’s Petition

Published

on

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has commenced an investigation into a petition filed against the former Managing Director of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Farouk Ahmed, by the President of Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote.

It was gathered that Dangote formally submitted the petition to the EFCC earlier this week through his legal representative, following the withdrawal of a similar petition from the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

Dangote had initially approached the ICPC, asking it to investigate Ahmed over allegations that he spent about $5 million on his children’s secondary education in Switzerland, an expense allegedly inconsistent with his known earnings as a public officer.

Although the petition was later withdrawn, the ICPC had said it would continue with its investigation.

Confirming the new development, a senior EFCC officer at the commission’s headquarters in Abuja, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to speak publicly, said the petition had been received and investigations had commenced.

“They have brought the petition to us, and an investigation has commenced on it. Serious work is being done concerning it,” the source said.

In the petition signed by Dangote’s lead counsel, Dr O.J. Onoja (SAN), the businessman urged the EFCC to investigate allegations of abuse of office and corrupt enrichment against Ahmed and to prosecute him if found culpable.

The petition further stated that Dangote was ready to provide documentary and other evidence to support claims of financial misconduct and impunity against the former regulator.

See also  SEE FULL LIST: Ambassadors-designate nominated by Tinubu

“We make bold to state that the commission is strategically positioned, along with sister agencies, to prosecute financial crimes and corruption-related offences, and upon establishing a prima facie case, the courts do not hesitate to punish offenders,” the petition read, citing recent court decisions.

Onoja also called on the EFCC, under the leadership of its chairman, Olanipekun Olukoyede, to thoroughly investigate the allegations and take appropriate legal action where necessary.

When contacted, the EFCC spokesperson, Dele Oyewale, declined to comment on the matter but promised to respond later. No official reaction had been received as of the time of filing this report.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MONEY TRANSFERS IN NIGERIA (2026)

Published

on

Starting from *January 2026*, please ensure that *any money you send* to anyone — including me — comes with a *clear description* or *payment remark*. This is *very important* for tax purposes.

Use descriptions like:

– *Gift*
– *Loan*
– *Loan Repayment*
– *House Rent*
– *School Fees*
– *Feeding*
– *Medical*
– *Support*,
– School fee etc.

*Why this matters:*

In 2026, any money entering your account *without a description* may be treated as *income*, and *IRS (or relevant tax authority)* could tax it — or even worse, ask you to explain the source.

The *first ₦800,000* may be *tax-free*, but after that, any unexplained funds might attract up to *20% tax*, or in extreme cases, lead to legal issues.

So please:

– *Always include a payment remark.*
– *Avoid using USSD or apps that don’t allow descriptions.*
– *Ask the receiver for the correct description BEFORE sending.*

As for me, *do not send me any money* without discussing it with me first.
And no, I don’t want to hear “Sir/Ma, I used USSD” – if you can’t add a description, *hold your money*.

From now on, *I will tell you exactly what to write in the payment remark.*
Let’s all form the habit of *adding payment descriptions now* to avoid problems later.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

See also  Obasanjo: See why I rejected El-Rufai as my successor
Continue Reading

Business

FG earmarks N1.7tn in 2026 budget for unpaid contractors

Published

on

The Federal Government has budgeted the sum of N1.7tn in the 2026 Appropriation Bill to settle outstanding debts owed to contractors for capital projects executed in 2024.

A breakdown of the proposed 2026 national budget shows that the amount is captured under the line item titled “Provision for 2024 Outstanding Contractor’s Liabilities,” signalling official recognition of delayed payments to contractors amid recent protests over delayed settlements.

This budgetary provision follows mounting pressure from indigenous contractors and civil society groups who, in 2025, raised alarm over unpaid contractual obligations allegedly exceeding N2tn.

Some groups under the All Indigenous Contractors Association of Nigeria had also staged demonstrations in Abuja, lamenting the severe impact of delayed payments on their operations, with many contractors reportedly unable to service bank loans taken to execute government projects.

Earlier, Minister of Works David Umahi had promised to clear verified arrears owed to federal contractors before the end of 2025. However, only partial payments were made amid revenue constraints, prompting the inclusion of the N1.7tn line item in the 2026 budget as a catch-up mechanism.

In addition to the N1.7tn for 2024 liabilities, the government has also budgeted N100bn for a separate line item labelled “Payment of Local Contractors’ Debts/Other Liabilities”, which may cover legacy debts from previous years, smaller contract claims, or unsettled financial commitments that were not fully verified in the current audit cycle.

The total N1.8tn allocation is part of the broader N23.2tn capital expenditure in the 2026 fiscal plan, which seeks to ramp up infrastructure delivery while cleaning up past obligations.

See also  Dangote refinery, engineers on warpath over fresh redeployment

Nigeria’s contractor debt backlog has been a recurring fiscal issue, worsened by delayed capital releases, partial cash-backing of budgeted projects, and underperformance in revenue targets.

Speaking with journalists at the entrance of the Federal Ministry of Finance in December 2025, the National Secretary of the All Indigenous Contractors Association of Nigeria, Babatunde Seun-Oyeniyi, said the government’s failure to release funds after multiple assurances had forced contractors to resume protests. He said members of the association were owed more than N500bn for projects already completed and commissioned.

He explained that despite recent assurances from the Minister of Finance, Wale Edun, no payment had been made. “After the National Assembly intervened, they told us that they will sit the minister down over this matter.  And we immediately stopped the protest,” he said.

According to him, repeated follow-up meetings with the minister had produced no tangible progress. “They have not responded to our request,” he said. “In fact, more than six times we have come here. Last week, we were here throughout the night before the Minister of Finance came.”

Oyeniyi said that although some payment warrants had been sighted, no funds had been released. “Specifically, when we collate, they are owing more than N500bn for all indigenous contractors. We only see warrants; there is no cash back.”

He accused officials of attempting to push the payments into the next fiscal year. “The problem is that they want to put us into a backlog. They want to shift us to 2026; that 2026, they are going to pay,” he alleged. “They will turn us into debt, and we don’t want that. We won’t leave here until we are paid.”

See also  Benin varsities, Nigerian polys in NYSC fraud

However, The PUNCH observed that earlier in August 2025, the Federal Government claimed that it had cleared over N2tn in outstanding capital budget obligations from the 2024 fiscal year, with a pledge to prioritise the timely release of 2025 capital funds.

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, disclosed this at a ministerial press briefing in Abuja, where he also declared that Nigeria is “open for business” to global investors on the back of improved economic stability.

“In the last quarter, we did pay contractors over N2tn to settle outstanding capital budget obligations. That is from last year,” Edun said. “At the moment, we have no pending obligations that are not being processed and financed. And the focus will now shift to 2025 capital releases.”

By December 2025, The PUNCH reported that President Bola Tinubu expressed “grave displeasure” over the backlog of unpaid federal contractors and set up a high-level committee to resolve the bottlenecks and fund repayments.

Briefing State House correspondents after the Federal Executive Council meeting in Abuja, Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, said the President was “upset” after learning that about 2,000 contractors are owed. “He made it very, very clear he is not happy and wants a one-stop solution,” Onanuga told journalists.

Tinubu directed the setting up of a committee to verify all claims from federal contractors. The new budget’s provisions are expected to draw from the outcome of that verification exercise and may be disbursed in tranches based on confirmed and certified claims.

See also  PDP crisis: Wike camp rejects zoning talks with Makinde, Diri

The total proposed 2026 national budget stands at N58.47tn, with N23.2tn earmarked for capital expenditure, N15.9tn for debt servicing, N15.25tn for recurrent spending, and N4.09tn for statutory transfers.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending