Connect with us

Business

15% tariff: Nigerians to pay N1tn extra for petrol yearly

Published

on

Nigerians will pay an additional amount of about N1tn (N973.6bn) annually on petrol imports following the Federal Government’s planned introduction of a 15 per cent import tariff on Premium Motor Spirit (petrol).

According to a petrol import trend report obtained from the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, reviewed by The PUNCH on Tuesday, Nigeria imported an average of 26.75 million litres of petrol daily between January and September 2025.

At a projected import tariff rate of N99.72 per litre, as stated in the presidential approval letter for the 15% tariff, the amount that would be spent as tariff for the 26.75 million litres would be about  N2.67bn daily.

When computed over a full year, this adds up to a staggering N973.64bn, which Nigerians will ultimately bear through higher pump prices once the policy is implemented. This amount, while representing additional revenue for government coffers, will translate to a direct increase in fuel expenses for households, transporters, and businesses nationwide.

President Bola Tinubu’s approval of a 15 per cent import policy on PMS and diesel has stirred widespread concern across the oil and gas sector, with operators warning it could raise petrol prices, worsen inflation, and increase import costs, even as the government insists the policy aims to boost local refining and generate revenue.

The President’s approval was conveyed in a letter signed by his Private Secretary, Damilotun Aderemi, following a proposal submitted by the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji.

The proposal sought the application of a 15 per cent duty on the cost, insurance, and freight value of imported petrol and diesel to align import costs with domestic market realities.

Adedeji, in his memo to the President, explained that the measure formed part of ongoing fiscal and energy reforms designed to strengthen the naira-based oil economy, ensure price stability, and accelerate the nation’s transition toward local refining capacity in line with the administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda for energy security and economic sustainability.

He also advised the government to ensure transparency by creating a designated Federal Government revenue account managed by the Nigeria Revenue Service, with verification and clearance oversight by the NMDPRA.

“At current CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) levels, this represents an increment of approximately N99.72 per litre, which nudges imported landed costs towards local cost recovery without choking supply or inflating consumer prices beyond sustainable thresholds.

“The core objective of this initiative is to operationalise crude transactions in local currency, strengthen local refining capacity, and ensure a stable, affordable supply of petroleum products across Nigeria,” Adedeji stated.

The FIRS boss noted that the policy is not revenue-driven but corrective, introduced to align import costs with local production realities and prevent duty-free imports from undercutting domestic refineries that are just beginning to recover.

He argued that the new tariff framework would discourage duty-free fuel imports from undercutting domestic producers and foster a fair and competitive downstream environment. He also warned that the current misalignment between locally refined products and import parity pricing has created instability in the market.

“While domestic refining of petrol has begun to increase and diesel sufficiency has been achieved, price instability persists, partly due to the misalignment between local refiners and marketers,” he wrote. The new policy takes effect after a 30-day transition period expected to end on November 21, 2025.

See also  Marketers drop petrol prices below Dangote’s cost

Dissenting voices

In response to the development, dissenting voices from industry experts and petroleum marketers have continued to grow louder, with many questioning the timing and potential impact of the 15 per cent import tariff.

The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria on Tuesday expressed reservations over the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel, describing it as inconsistent with the spirit of market deregulation.

Speaking in an interview with our correspondent, the National Publicity Secretary of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, said independent marketers were not opposed to Tinubu’s directive but faulted the policy’s design, which he argued undermines the principles of a free and competitive market.

“Independent marketers don’t have any problem with the President’s directive, but the only issue is that because of policymakers, the policy doesn’t follow the spirit of deregulation,” Ukadike said.

“Once you liberalise the market and then start to favour a certain section of the industry against others, it means you are putting the cart before the horse. The liberalisation was meant to ensure a free market driven by a willing buyer, willing seller arrangement. The policy should not be an impediment for those who want to import to challenge the local industry.”

He urged the Federal Government to focus on incentivising local refineries rather than imposing tariffs on fuel imports, noting that such measures could distort competition and discourage private participation.

“The government should rather encourage local refineries by giving them crude and reducing taxes for local refiners so that they can lower their prices. The important thing is the price war between refineries and importers. One thing I know is that there is no way domestic products will be cheaper, and marketers will still decide to import. There is no need to put a tariff on importation because they would know importing is not lucrative and would source products locally. So we must do everything to boost our market and solve issues. The government has to allow domestic refiners and importers to compete without government-induced favouritism,” he advised.

According to Ukadike, the natural dynamics of market forces would make imports unattractive once local production becomes cheaper. “There is no need to put a tariff on importation because once domestic products are cheaper, marketers will naturally source locally. The government must allow domestic refiners and importers to compete freely without government-induced restrictions,” he explained.

He warned that any artificial increase in fuel prices would further drive inflation, especially ahead of the Yuletide season when demand for petrol typically rises.

“The most important element of market forces is a price drop. Any addition in pricing will lead to inflation, especially now that Christmas is approaching and more people will be travelling. There must be no shortage of products, and the government must ensure local refining, distribution, and collaboration with stakeholders are in full gear,” Ukadike added.

The Chief Executive Officer of PetroleumPrice.ng, Jeremiah Olatide, described the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a double-edged policy, one that could boost government revenue but also worsen the economic hardship faced by Nigerians.

See also  UPDATED: ECOWAS declares state of emergency in West Africa

Reacting to the development, the oil market analyst said the tariff would significantly impact fuel prices and inflation levels, especially as Nigerians continue to adjust to the effects of the fuel subsidy removal.

“Yes, that calculation is accurate,” he told The PUNCH in response to estimates showing Nigerians may pay nearly N1tn extra annually on petrol imports due to the new tariff. Although the figure can go higher because we are still in the current year, depending on landing costs, too.”

According to him, while the policy represents a strategic move to shore up revenue amid fiscal constraints, it comes at a difficult time for most Nigerians. “For me, it is a good thing that revenue will increase. It’s a smart way to generate income for the country, considering our current expenses and the need for multiple revenue streams.

“But the timing is not really good. Nigerians are still struggling to buy petrol at N800 or N900 per litre. Subsidy removal happened two years ago and has already taken a toll on households. Adding extra expenses through a tariff will hit them hard and definitely push up inflation,” he explained.

He also warned that a combination of the 15 per cent import duty and a proposed five per cent surcharge could further burden consumers and distort market stability.

He said, “The timing is not really good. Two years ago, the subsidy was removed. The effect has not reduced, and we are already facing another issue. The government also plans to begin a five per cent surcharge soon. All of these just make them an additional burden on Nigerians. The government has to be strategic in the rollout.

“I know they are trying to protect local refineries, but there are better policies and ways to support them without having to put more burden on Nigerians. The government could have prioritised a naira-for-crude deal instead.”

The energy expert further noted that the tariff would not necessarily halt fuel importation, as some traders might still find ways to bring in products despite the higher cost.

“I am so sure that some importers will still import. They will find ways to import, not minding the challenges. This policy will not ease out importation of products. Some importers will still look for ways to import, and all of that will still be added to the pump price. Nigerians are craving a price drop, but with these multiple taxes coming into play, that hope seems far away,” he lamented.

He urged the government to adopt policies that strengthen local refining and stabilise the upstream oil sector instead. “The right policy should be enhancing the naira for crude deals to all local refineries. All of them should take feedstock in naira. It would help them grow faster.

“The government should look into the upstream sector and make sure a production of three million barrels per day of crude is ensured. There will be stability with this. Patronage will also increase if prices drop. That’s the only way to achieve price stability and increase market confidence,” he said.

See also  Wema Bank is the longest surviving indigenous bank in Nigeria.

Meanwhile, the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria earlier called for the resuscitation of the country’s refineries before December to avert possible fuel scarcity and price hikes during the festive season.

PETROAN President, Billy Gillis-Harry, described the tariff policy as a bold step toward protecting domestic refineries, stabilising the market, and promoting energy security. He, however, warned that if the measure was poorly implemented, it could cripple fuel importation and render many importers jobless, a situation he said would lead to fuel scarcity.

“NNPC must complete its partnership agreements quickly and start production at Nigeria’s refineries before December to avert any form of fuel scarcity or price hike during the Yuletide season,” he said.

Despite the additional costs Nigerians are expected to bear, the policy decision by the government has also attracted commendations from some stakeholders who view it as a bold step toward boosting revenue and encouraging local refining.

CPPE backs govt

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise threw its weight behind the Federal Government’s newly introduced 15 per cent import duty on refined petroleum products, describing it as a step toward reviving Nigeria’s industrial base and promoting economic self-sufficiency.

The private sector think tank said the measure represents a “strategic protectionist policy” designed to safeguard emerging domestic industries, including local refineries, while stimulating productivity, job creation, and foreign exchange savings.

In a statement signed by the Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, the CPPE noted that Nigeria’s excessive dependence on imports over the past decades had weakened its productive capacity, eroded competitiveness, and exposed the economy to external shocks.

It argued that sectors previously protected through calibrated policy interventions, such as cement, flour, and beverages, have recorded remarkable growth and value addition, proving that well-targeted protectionism can strengthen national industries.

The group clarified that its position does not support economic isolationism but a measured approach to industrial protection that helps domestic industries scale up and compete globally.

“Strategic protectionism is not about closing borders or creating monopolies,” CPPE said. “It is about building domestic capacity to engage the global economy from a position of strength.”

The organisation described the 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a progressive and corrective policy, adding that it could help level the playing field for domestic refiners such as the Dangote Refinery, NNPCL refineries, and modular plants currently struggling to compete with cheaper imports.

While commending the tariff, CPPE stressed that protection alone would not guarantee industrial success. It urged the government to complement the measure with fiscal incentives, low-cost financing, affordable and reliable energy supply, strategic infrastructure investment, and streamlined regulatory processes.

According to the centre, these support structures are critical to ensuring that protection leads to lower production costs, price stabilisation, and improved consumer welfare in the long run.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Abia begins relocation of transport operators to new terminal

Published

on

The Abia State Government has commenced the enforcement of its new centralised transport system in Umuahia, with the phased relocation of transport operators to the Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal, Umuahia.

The Commissioner for Information, Okey Kanu, made this known at Government House, Umuahia, on Tuesday while briefing newsmen on the outcome of this week’s State Executive Council (EXCO) meeting presided over by Governor Alex Otti.

The commissioner disclosed that, in order to ensure compliance by transport operators, the state government took time to hold a series of meetings with transport stakeholders, during which their concerns were addressed.

Kanu added that, following the steps taken by the government, full operations had commenced at the terminal, with informal transport operators and unions already moved to the facility, despite the normal resistance that accompanies change.

“There appears to be some push backs among some of the operators and this is as a result of the fact that people are not easily giving in to change.

“What is happening is that all the parks in the state have been moved to the bus terminal.

“The Honourable Commissioner for Transport and his team have been holding a series of meetings with all the operators. They had one yesterday. And a few of their anxieties will be addressed very soon. Enforcement also will commence today to bring all the operators into the terminal.

“The first phase of operations involves the operations of the Abia Green Shuttle buses. The second phase involves informal transport operators, while the third phase will involve the formal transport operators,” Kanu stated.

See also  Tinubu shifts 15% fuel import duty to Q1 2026

Answering questions from newsmen, the Commissioner for Transport, Dr Chimezie Ukaegbu, said the state government had not taken away anybody’s means of livelihood but had instead introduced a more organised system to sanitise the transport sector and improve it.

He revealed that transport unions and operators were told to bring four of their workers each to the terminal, where they would be properly identified with reflective tags and carried along.

He further noted that the terminal operates a transparent system that allocates loading opportunities on a first-come, first-served basis irrespective of union affiliations, insisting that about 80 to 90 per cent of operators had embraced the initiative. He added that continuous engagements were being held with those yet to fully comply with the government’s transport policy.

He equally noted that the government provided a drivers’ lodge, fully air-conditioned and furnished with seats, while passengers sit in a conducive air-conditioned environment, adding, “what else will you need as a transporter or even as a passenger? I think everything good about transportation is embedded in that Nnenna Otti Bus Terminal,” Ukaegbu stated.

Contributing, the Special Adviser to the Governor on Media and Publicity, Mr Ferdinand Ekeoma, said that the centralisation of transport operations would reduce urban congestion, indiscriminate loading bays, expenses incurred by transport operators on their loading bays, and security challenges associated with the influx of unregulated transport operators, thereby enabling transport operators to make more gains.

He added that, over the years, “we have seen transport operators extort people, by coming up with this organised system, we are solving our problems,” Ekeoma stated.

See also  UPDATED: ECOWAS declares state of emergency in West Africa

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Court orders Virgin Atlantic to pay N13m for missed flight

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has ordered Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited to pay Mrs. Joy Ezetah the sum of $5,906.50 in damages after it failed to allow her board a scheduled Lagos-London flight, an incident that disrupted her onward trip to Canada and caused her financial loss.

Justice Ibrahim Kala in the judgement delivered on Monday, held that the airline was liable for the losses suffered by the claimant after she was denied boarding at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport on 6 April 2024.

The claimant had asked the court for N100m in general damages, arguing that she bought a business-class ticket through Air Canada for a four-leg trip from Lagos to Toronto and back, but was stopped from boarding the Virgin Atlantic flight “without justification.”

She told the court that she arrived early, completed check-in, and was issued a boarding pass for the Lagos-London leg.

According to her, airline officials later prevented her from boarding, stating they could not connect her ticket to her Air Canada connecting flight from London to Toronto.

Ezetah stated that the airline owed her a duty of care and should have resolved the issue with Air Canada or made other arrangements instead of denying her boarding.

She further maintained that when she later contacted Air Canada, the airline confirmed that her ticket was valid and that she was expected on the connecting flight.

Virgin Atlantic, however, denied liability. It said it was “not the issuing carrier” and insisted that the ticket had been purchased directly from Air Canada under a codeshare arrangement.

See also  Nigerian businesses to lose billions of naira as 25-day blackout hits Lagos, Ogun

The airline also argued that an error code in the reservation system prevented it from issuing a boarding pass for the connecting flight and that it acted professionally by advising the passenger to contact the ticket issuer.

It further contended that the claimant’s inability to complete online check-in before arriving at the airport showed that there was already a problem with the ticket.

After reviewing the evidence, submissions and legal authorities cited by both sides, Justice Kala held that the claimant’s case had merit.

The court awarded $5,906.50 in damages against Virgin Atlantic and ordered that the sum be paid using the prevailing exchange rate published by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Based on the highest official rate of N1,365.50 to a dollar, the award translates to about N8.07m.

Justice Kala also ordered the airline to pay 10 per cent interest per annum on the judgment sum until full liquidation of the debt.

Additionally, the court awarded N5m as costs against Virgin Atlantic, noting that the claimant had been forced to approach the court to enforce her rights.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

States kick as Senate moves to amend Electricity Act; read details

Published

on

A fresh battle over the control of Nigeria’s electricity sector is brewing, as state electricity regulators have accused the National Assembly of attempting to claw back powers already devolved to states under the Constitution and the Electricity Act 2023.

In a strongly worded memorandum submitted to the Senate Committee on Power and obtained by our correspondent on Tuesday, electricity regulatory commissions and bureaus from 16 states warned that the proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 could reverse one of the most significant reforms in Nigeria’s power sector.

The regulators argued that the amendment bill, rather than strengthening the electricity market, seeks to restore extensive federal oversight over matters they insist have constitutionally become the responsibility of states.

The concerns were contained in a letter dated May 26, 2026, addressed to the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Power and signed on behalf of the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions and Bureaus.

Signatories to the document included the chairmen and chief executives of electricity regulators in Abia, Anambra, Bayelsa, Edo, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Kogi, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo and Plateau states.

The regulators said they had taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to begin building sub-national electricity markets and had already engaged investors based on the framework created by the law.

They noted that they had earlier met with the Senate committee and were subsequently requested to consolidate their concerns into a single memorandum for the consideration of lawmakers, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders.

The letter stated, “We represent State Regulatory Commissions/Bureaus that have taken advantage of the Electricity Act 2023 to commence the development of our sub-national electricity markets and sectors.

We are grateful for the audience you granted us to raise concerns on the ongoing consideration of the proposed Amendment Bill 2026 to the Electricity Act 2023.

“As agreed during our discussion, we have collated and consolidated the comments into one document which is hereby attached for the consideration of the Senate and House Committees on Power, NERC and other stakeholders.”

The state electricity regulators said they had identified 17 contentious provisions in the proposed amendments to the Electricity Act that they believed could undermine the constitutional powers already granted to states in the electricity sector.

According to the regulators, the areas of disagreement include the authorisation of State Houses of Assembly to legislate on electricity matters, the supremacy of state laws within state electricity markets, and provisions seeking to retain federal control over all activities connected to the national grid.

Other disputed clauses relate to restrictions on states’ participation in the wholesale electricity market, matters concerning the Nigerian Wholesale Electricity Market, the authority of states over independent transmission and distribution networks, and the establishment and administration of the Power Consumers Assistance Fund.

The regulators also raised concerns over the proposed expansion of the powers of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, the structure and decisions of the Forum of Electricity Regulators, and the provision granting the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission final administrative appellate jurisdiction on certain issues arising within the forum.

See also  Ekiti poll: APC adopts consensus as Oyebanji’s rival withdraws

They further opposed provisions designating electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply as essential services, as well as clauses dealing with government-owned enterprises as licensees and obligations to host communities.

Additional areas of contention include the regulation of intra-state electricity matters that may have implications for the national grid, the imposition of timelines and phased conditions for states transitioning into independent electricity markets, and proposed federal oversight on consumer protection, anti-trust measures and tariff design within state electricity jurisdictions.

The regulators argued that the disputed provisions require further consultation to ensure that the decentralisation objectives of the Electricity Act are not weakened by subsequent amendments.

“A review of the Bill suggests that the general intention is to reverse the devolution of legislative, governance and regulatory powers over electricity matters that occur solely within the respective states to the state governments, in favour of a reconsolidation of powers at the federal level, with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission retaining full supervisory powers over the market. Effectively, it appears that the intention of the Bill is that Nigeria should continue with the same regime that, for 20 years, has not led to any significant increase in power availability or per capita consumption for Nigerians, despite ever-increasing (and unsustainable) federal debt.”

At the centre of the dispute is the interpretation of the constitutional amendments that allowed states to legislate on electricity matters within their territories. The regulators argued that the proposed amendment bill wrongly assumes that state legislatures derive their powers from the National Assembly rather than directly from the Constitution.

According to them, any attempt by the National Assembly to grant, restrict or redefine those powers through ordinary legislation would amount to a constitutional violation.

The memorandum stated, “Section 2 of the Bill aims to amend Section 2(2)(a)-(e) of the Principal Act. By that section, the National Assembly reserves to itself the power to delegate legislative powers to States’ Houses of Assembly, suggesting that the Bill (or the Principal Act) is the source of the powers of a state to make laws on its electricity markets.

“This provision is based on a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law—it proceeds from the wrong assumption that the NASS, by ordinary legislation and not constitutional amendment, can confer (or restrict) the legislative power of states.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do.

“The constitutional division of powers is fundamental to federalism, ensuring a balance between national unity and state autonomy. There is no legal framework for the NASS to ‘empower’ state governments to make law by ordinary legislation, as the language of the Bill attempts to do. Consequently, Section 2 of the Bill, seeking to amend Section 2 of the Act, is not consistent with the Constitution.”

See also  Nigerian businesses to lose billions of naira as 25-day blackout hits Lagos, Ogun

The regulators described as “a shocking miscomprehension of Nigerian constitutional law” the provisions of the bill that appear to suggest that the National Assembly is the source of states’ authority over electricity matters.

They warned that the proposed law could undermine the principle of federalism by weakening state autonomy. Beyond constitutional concerns, the regulators said the bill could create uncertainty in the electricity market and discourage investors who had already committed resources based on the existing legal framework.

“The clear intention behind the new drafting is to reconsolidate in the Federal Government matters solely within the state electricity markets which had been devolved to the states,” the memorandum stated.

“This will defeat the key objectives of the Electricity Act and the various states’ electricity laws, even before the regime introduced by them has taken any root. It will introduce avoidable disruption in the industry as significant investment decisions have already been taken based on the Electricity Act 2023, and these investments are now put at risk by this proposed amendment.”

The state regulators specifically faulted provisions relating to federal oversight of activities connected to the national grid, restrictions on state authority over wholesale electricity transactions, the proposed expansion of NERC’s powers and changes affecting mini-grids and independent distribution systems.

They argued that allowing NERC to retain overriding authority over electricity activities merely because they have some connection to the national grid would effectively render state powers meaningless.

The memorandum stated, “What is required, in order to attain the full benefits of the decentralisation of the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that is the theme of the Fifth Alteration and provided for in the Principal Act, is proper coordination on transmission matters between NERC and state regulators, and not top-down federal legislation.”

The regulators also rejected provisions that would permit NERC to exercise final administrative appellate jurisdiction over disputes involving state electricity regulators. According to them, NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority.

“NERC and the SERCs are on equal standing within their respective constitutional spheres of authority,” the memorandum said. “The National Assembly cannot arrogate to NERC quasi-judicial authority over SERCs, especially where the dispute might be on a matter over which NERC has no authority.”

They further argued that the Constitution already vests judicial powers in the courts and that such responsibilities cannot be transferred to a regulatory agency. The proposed establishment of a Forum of Electricity Regulators also drew criticism.

Although the regulators acknowledged the importance of coordination among electricity regulators, they argued that participation in such arrangements should be voluntary rather than imposed through federal legislation.

See also  PENGASSAN stops gas, crude supply to Dangote refinery

“The better approach would be a Memorandum of Understanding or similar instrument jointly negotiated by all relevant regulatory bodies in which the principles of coordination and harmonisation will be agreed,” they said.

The state regulators equally opposed provisions declaring generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity as essential services covering both federal and state electricity markets.

According to them, such provisions could inadvertently expand NERC’s jurisdiction into areas already devolved to states, including tariff regulation. “The provision is invidious, regressive and should be expunged,” the memorandum stated.

The regulators also faulted proposals empowering NERC to determine contributions to the Power Consumers Assistance Fund from electricity consumers. They argued that since electricity tariffs and retail supply have become matters for state regulation, decisions relating to subsidies and customer contributions should similarly reside with state authorities.

Other contentious areas identified by the regulators included host community obligations, the role of the Nigerian Electricity Management Services Agency, licensing arrangements involving government-owned electricity enterprises and timelines for states transitioning into independent electricity markets.

The dispute highlights the growing tension between the Federal Government and states over the future structure of Nigeria’s electricity industry. The Electricity Act 2023 was enacted following the Fifth Alteration to the 1999 Constitution, which removed electricity from the Exclusive Legislative List and empowered states to generate, transmit and distribute electricity within their territories.

Since then, several states have enacted electricity laws and established regulatory agencies to oversee emerging sub-national electricity markets. Lagos, Enugu, Ekiti, Ondo, Edo and other states have already commenced varying stages of implementation of their electricity reform programmes.

Energy experts have repeatedly described the decentralisation of the sector as a major opportunity to attract investment, improve efficiency and expand access to electricity. However, the latest amendment proposals appear to have reopened the debate over how regulatory powers should be shared between Abuja and the states.

As the National Assembly continues deliberations on the amendment bill, the position adopted by lawmakers could shape the future direction of Nigeria’s electricity reforms and determine whether the country deepens its experiment with decentralisation or returns to a more centralised regulatory model.

The Electricity Act 2023 was designed to operationalise the constitutional amendments that empowered states to participate directly in electricity generation, transmission and distribution within their boundaries. Since its enactment, several states have passed their own electricity laws and established regulatory commissions.

The proposed Electricity Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 seeks to amend several provisions of the principal legislation. However, state regulators contend that some of the proposed changes amount to an attempt to reverse the gains of decentralisation and restore broad federal control over the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending