Connect with us

Business

15% tariff: Nigerians to pay N1tn extra for petrol yearly

Published

on

Nigerians will pay an additional amount of about N1tn (N973.6bn) annually on petrol imports following the Federal Government’s planned introduction of a 15 per cent import tariff on Premium Motor Spirit (petrol).

According to a petrol import trend report obtained from the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, reviewed by The PUNCH on Tuesday, Nigeria imported an average of 26.75 million litres of petrol daily between January and September 2025.

At a projected import tariff rate of N99.72 per litre, as stated in the presidential approval letter for the 15% tariff, the amount that would be spent as tariff for the 26.75 million litres would be about  N2.67bn daily.

When computed over a full year, this adds up to a staggering N973.64bn, which Nigerians will ultimately bear through higher pump prices once the policy is implemented. This amount, while representing additional revenue for government coffers, will translate to a direct increase in fuel expenses for households, transporters, and businesses nationwide.

President Bola Tinubu’s approval of a 15 per cent import policy on PMS and diesel has stirred widespread concern across the oil and gas sector, with operators warning it could raise petrol prices, worsen inflation, and increase import costs, even as the government insists the policy aims to boost local refining and generate revenue.

The President’s approval was conveyed in a letter signed by his Private Secretary, Damilotun Aderemi, following a proposal submitted by the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji.

The proposal sought the application of a 15 per cent duty on the cost, insurance, and freight value of imported petrol and diesel to align import costs with domestic market realities.

Adedeji, in his memo to the President, explained that the measure formed part of ongoing fiscal and energy reforms designed to strengthen the naira-based oil economy, ensure price stability, and accelerate the nation’s transition toward local refining capacity in line with the administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda for energy security and economic sustainability.

He also advised the government to ensure transparency by creating a designated Federal Government revenue account managed by the Nigeria Revenue Service, with verification and clearance oversight by the NMDPRA.

“At current CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) levels, this represents an increment of approximately N99.72 per litre, which nudges imported landed costs towards local cost recovery without choking supply or inflating consumer prices beyond sustainable thresholds.

“The core objective of this initiative is to operationalise crude transactions in local currency, strengthen local refining capacity, and ensure a stable, affordable supply of petroleum products across Nigeria,” Adedeji stated.

The FIRS boss noted that the policy is not revenue-driven but corrective, introduced to align import costs with local production realities and prevent duty-free imports from undercutting domestic refineries that are just beginning to recover.

He argued that the new tariff framework would discourage duty-free fuel imports from undercutting domestic producers and foster a fair and competitive downstream environment. He also warned that the current misalignment between locally refined products and import parity pricing has created instability in the market.

“While domestic refining of petrol has begun to increase and diesel sufficiency has been achieved, price instability persists, partly due to the misalignment between local refiners and marketers,” he wrote. The new policy takes effect after a 30-day transition period expected to end on November 21, 2025.

See also  U.S terminates all trade talks with Canada

Dissenting voices

In response to the development, dissenting voices from industry experts and petroleum marketers have continued to grow louder, with many questioning the timing and potential impact of the 15 per cent import tariff.

The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria on Tuesday expressed reservations over the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel, describing it as inconsistent with the spirit of market deregulation.

Speaking in an interview with our correspondent, the National Publicity Secretary of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, said independent marketers were not opposed to Tinubu’s directive but faulted the policy’s design, which he argued undermines the principles of a free and competitive market.

“Independent marketers don’t have any problem with the President’s directive, but the only issue is that because of policymakers, the policy doesn’t follow the spirit of deregulation,” Ukadike said.

“Once you liberalise the market and then start to favour a certain section of the industry against others, it means you are putting the cart before the horse. The liberalisation was meant to ensure a free market driven by a willing buyer, willing seller arrangement. The policy should not be an impediment for those who want to import to challenge the local industry.”

He urged the Federal Government to focus on incentivising local refineries rather than imposing tariffs on fuel imports, noting that such measures could distort competition and discourage private participation.

“The government should rather encourage local refineries by giving them crude and reducing taxes for local refiners so that they can lower their prices. The important thing is the price war between refineries and importers. One thing I know is that there is no way domestic products will be cheaper, and marketers will still decide to import. There is no need to put a tariff on importation because they would know importing is not lucrative and would source products locally. So we must do everything to boost our market and solve issues. The government has to allow domestic refiners and importers to compete without government-induced favouritism,” he advised.

According to Ukadike, the natural dynamics of market forces would make imports unattractive once local production becomes cheaper. “There is no need to put a tariff on importation because once domestic products are cheaper, marketers will naturally source locally. The government must allow domestic refiners and importers to compete freely without government-induced restrictions,” he explained.

He warned that any artificial increase in fuel prices would further drive inflation, especially ahead of the Yuletide season when demand for petrol typically rises.

“The most important element of market forces is a price drop. Any addition in pricing will lead to inflation, especially now that Christmas is approaching and more people will be travelling. There must be no shortage of products, and the government must ensure local refining, distribution, and collaboration with stakeholders are in full gear,” Ukadike added.

The Chief Executive Officer of PetroleumPrice.ng, Jeremiah Olatide, described the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a double-edged policy, one that could boost government revenue but also worsen the economic hardship faced by Nigerians.

See also  See why Ooni of Ife praised Zulum

Reacting to the development, the oil market analyst said the tariff would significantly impact fuel prices and inflation levels, especially as Nigerians continue to adjust to the effects of the fuel subsidy removal.

“Yes, that calculation is accurate,” he told The PUNCH in response to estimates showing Nigerians may pay nearly N1tn extra annually on petrol imports due to the new tariff. Although the figure can go higher because we are still in the current year, depending on landing costs, too.”

According to him, while the policy represents a strategic move to shore up revenue amid fiscal constraints, it comes at a difficult time for most Nigerians. “For me, it is a good thing that revenue will increase. It’s a smart way to generate income for the country, considering our current expenses and the need for multiple revenue streams.

“But the timing is not really good. Nigerians are still struggling to buy petrol at N800 or N900 per litre. Subsidy removal happened two years ago and has already taken a toll on households. Adding extra expenses through a tariff will hit them hard and definitely push up inflation,” he explained.

He also warned that a combination of the 15 per cent import duty and a proposed five per cent surcharge could further burden consumers and distort market stability.

He said, “The timing is not really good. Two years ago, the subsidy was removed. The effect has not reduced, and we are already facing another issue. The government also plans to begin a five per cent surcharge soon. All of these just make them an additional burden on Nigerians. The government has to be strategic in the rollout.

“I know they are trying to protect local refineries, but there are better policies and ways to support them without having to put more burden on Nigerians. The government could have prioritised a naira-for-crude deal instead.”

The energy expert further noted that the tariff would not necessarily halt fuel importation, as some traders might still find ways to bring in products despite the higher cost.

“I am so sure that some importers will still import. They will find ways to import, not minding the challenges. This policy will not ease out importation of products. Some importers will still look for ways to import, and all of that will still be added to the pump price. Nigerians are craving a price drop, but with these multiple taxes coming into play, that hope seems far away,” he lamented.

He urged the government to adopt policies that strengthen local refining and stabilise the upstream oil sector instead. “The right policy should be enhancing the naira for crude deals to all local refineries. All of them should take feedstock in naira. It would help them grow faster.

“The government should look into the upstream sector and make sure a production of three million barrels per day of crude is ensured. There will be stability with this. Patronage will also increase if prices drop. That’s the only way to achieve price stability and increase market confidence,” he said.

See also  How Nigerians can apply for 2027/2028 UK commonwealth scholarship – FG

Meanwhile, the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria earlier called for the resuscitation of the country’s refineries before December to avert possible fuel scarcity and price hikes during the festive season.

PETROAN President, Billy Gillis-Harry, described the tariff policy as a bold step toward protecting domestic refineries, stabilising the market, and promoting energy security. He, however, warned that if the measure was poorly implemented, it could cripple fuel importation and render many importers jobless, a situation he said would lead to fuel scarcity.

“NNPC must complete its partnership agreements quickly and start production at Nigeria’s refineries before December to avert any form of fuel scarcity or price hike during the Yuletide season,” he said.

Despite the additional costs Nigerians are expected to bear, the policy decision by the government has also attracted commendations from some stakeholders who view it as a bold step toward boosting revenue and encouraging local refining.

CPPE backs govt

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise threw its weight behind the Federal Government’s newly introduced 15 per cent import duty on refined petroleum products, describing it as a step toward reviving Nigeria’s industrial base and promoting economic self-sufficiency.

The private sector think tank said the measure represents a “strategic protectionist policy” designed to safeguard emerging domestic industries, including local refineries, while stimulating productivity, job creation, and foreign exchange savings.

In a statement signed by the Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, the CPPE noted that Nigeria’s excessive dependence on imports over the past decades had weakened its productive capacity, eroded competitiveness, and exposed the economy to external shocks.

It argued that sectors previously protected through calibrated policy interventions, such as cement, flour, and beverages, have recorded remarkable growth and value addition, proving that well-targeted protectionism can strengthen national industries.

The group clarified that its position does not support economic isolationism but a measured approach to industrial protection that helps domestic industries scale up and compete globally.

“Strategic protectionism is not about closing borders or creating monopolies,” CPPE said. “It is about building domestic capacity to engage the global economy from a position of strength.”

The organisation described the 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a progressive and corrective policy, adding that it could help level the playing field for domestic refiners such as the Dangote Refinery, NNPCL refineries, and modular plants currently struggling to compete with cheaper imports.

While commending the tariff, CPPE stressed that protection alone would not guarantee industrial success. It urged the government to complement the measure with fiscal incentives, low-cost financing, affordable and reliable energy supply, strategic infrastructure investment, and streamlined regulatory processes.

According to the centre, these support structures are critical to ensuring that protection leads to lower production costs, price stabilisation, and improved consumer welfare in the long run.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian, Indonesian firms sign $10m business deals

Published

on

Nigerian and Indonesian companies have signed business agreements worth a combined $10m to strengthen trade and economic cooperation between the two countries.

The Indonesian Ambassador to Nigeria, Bambang Suharto, disclosed this on Thursday during a memorandum of understanding signing ceremony involving Nigerian investors and their Indonesian counterparts at the 2026 Trade Expo Indonesia.

The agreements were among a broader collection of business commitments at the expo, where 55 memoranda of understanding involving Indonesian companies and international business partners were signed.

The participating countries included Nigeria, Australia, Canada, Chile, Germany, Hungary, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam.

The event had present ambassadors, diplomatic representatives, international buyers and business partners.

The occasion was highly praised as one of the significant moments of the 2026 Trade Expo Indonesia which kickstarted and was declared opened on Wednesday.

Suharto speaking to Journalists described the agreements involving Nigerian and Indonesian companies as a historic development, expressing optimism that the partnerships would expand bilateral business relations and deliver economic benefits to both countries.

“Today we are witnessing a very historical moment for this year. We have two companies who are having signing ceremony, the MOU, a business contract with their counterpart in Indonesia. So, the amount reached in total 10 million USD or 5 million USD each,” the ambassador said.

He explained that the agreements covered the dental equipment and pharmaceutical sectors, describing them as important areas with significant implications for public welfare.

The ambassador urged Indonesian businesses to look beyond commercial trading and explore investment opportunities in Nigeria, noting that some Indonesian companies already operating in the country had demonstrated the benefits of long-term business engagement.

See also  UN deputy chief urges countries to prioritise economic opportunities for women

“I mentioned that there are now some Indonesian companies operating in Nigeria. So, they are a good example. For so many years, they have been doing business in Nigeria, creating job opportunities for the locals and also absorb the local resources that can be produced in their factory and bring, of course, for the benefit of Nigeria as well,” he said.

Suharto encouraged Nigerian companies to invest in Indonesia, highlighting the countries’ large populations, available human resources and investment potential.

“We have 280 million people and Nigeria has 230 million people. In both countries, we have a demographic bonus. So, we have also attractive manpower, which is good for investment,” he said.

He added that Indonesia remained open to Nigerian businesses seeking opportunities in its market.

One of the Nigerian investors who signed an agreement, Ralph-Michael Simon-Michael of Irad Investment Limited, said his company had partnered with Indonesian firm PT Winn Appliance to introduce domestic gas appliances into the Nigerian market.

Simon-Michael, whose company is headquartered in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, said the partnership was aimed at making the products accessible to ordinary Nigerians through established distribution channels.

“So, we’re based in Port Harcourt, our headquarters. So, we’re an oil and gas servicing company. We’ve come to Indonesia to partner with a company called Win Appliances. So, we’re going to be bringing gas, domestic appliances into Nigeria,” he said.

He explained that the products would be targeted at everyday consumers and distributed nationwide through established retail outlets and cash-and-carry distributors.

“The appliances that we’re bringing are for domestic use, for the everyday consumer. So, the everyday man can essentially afford these appliances that we’re bringing in,” he said.

See also  How Nigerians can apply for 2027/2028 UK commonwealth scholarship – FG

Simon-Michael named Shoprite, Next cash-and-carry distributors among other outlets, through which he said the products would be distributed across Nigeria.

He said the company’s long-term plan was to establish a factory in Indonesia, and expand its operations into other African countries.

The investment agreements also formed part of broader efforts to deepen trade relations between Nigeria and Indonesia, according to Sheye Oyetade, Executive Director of Invest Nigeria, who said the Nigerian delegation was working to translate existing cooperation agreements into practical business opportunities.

Oyetade said the delegation’s participation was linked to the memorandum of understanding between Invest Nigeria and the Developing Eight (D-8) countries, a grouping of countries that includes Nigeria and Indonesia.

“We actually came to service our Memorandum of Understanding with D8 to make sure that trade is actually seamless between Nigeria and Indonesia,” he said.

He added that economic reforms in Nigeria had created opportunities for cross-border trade and investment, while the country’s growing population offered businesses access to a large consumer market.

“The signing of the MOU is key, simply because, whether you like it or not, Africa is becoming the major darling of the world in terms of the market,” Oyetade said.

He projected that Nigeria’s population would rise to about 400 million by 2050, arguing that the expansion would increase its importance as a destination for investment and consumer goods.

“So, where the people are, there the market is. So, that’s exactly what we are doing here today,” he said.

The agreements are expected to strengthen commercial links between businesses in both countries, with participants expressing hope that the partnerships would encourage further investment, job creation and the exchange of products and expertise.

See also  U.S terminates all trade talks with Canada

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

FG, NLC clash over minimum wage talks

Published

on

The Federal Government and the Nigeria Labour Congress have disagreed over when negotiations for a new national minimum wage should begin, with organised labour challenging the government’s interpretation of the law and demanding that preparations commence immediately.

The disagreement followed an exchange of letters between the Minister of Labour and Employment, Dr Muhammad Dingyadi, and NLC President, Joe Ajaero, over the timetable for reviewing the N70,000 minimum wage signed into law in July 2024.

In a letter dated 13 October, 2026, Ajaero rejected the government’s position that a fresh review would be premature, arguing that the statutory timetable under the original National Minimum Wage Act, 2019, remained relevant despite the 2024 amendment.

He said the government should begin the process by calling for nominations and inaugurating the National Minimum Wage Tripartite Committee, which brings together the government, organised labour and employers.

“The time is now. The appropriate time is now,” Ajaero wrote in the letter shared on Thursday, arguing that delaying the process would worsen the hardship facing Nigerian workers.

His response came a day after Dingyadi, in a letter dated October 12, acknowledged receipt of a communique issued after a joint meeting of the NLC’s Central Working Committee and National Executive Council.

The minister said the current minimum wage would become due for review on 1 June, 2027, and argued that commencing another review barely two years after the implementation of the N70,000 wage would be premature and disruptive to industrial relations.

The latest exchange comes amid growing pressure from the labour movement over the rising cost of living and the erosion of workers’ purchasing power.

See also  Strike: FG, ASUU in high-stakes talks

In an Independence Day statement on 1 October, the country’s biggest labour union demanded an immediate reduction in petrol prices, a nationwide wage award and the commencement of negotiations for a new national minimum wage. The statement, signed by Ajaero and titled “Our Hope Depends on the Choices We Make and the Actions We Take”, linked rising transportation, food, rent and education costs to the declining value of workers’ earnings.

Workers also called for the implementation of tax relief measures agreed upon with the government in October 2023, arguing that the union should not continue to bear the burden of rising living costs without additional support.

The NLC demanded that petrol prices be reduced to the levels prevailing when the current minimum wage was signed into law in 2024, negotiations for a new wage begin before the end of October, and outstanding agreements with health and public sector workers be implemented.

It warned that failure to meet the demands within the stipulated period would compel it to take further action as directed by its relevant organs.

Against this backdrop, the minister’s October 12 letter rejected the call for an immediate review, prompting Ajaero’s response the following day.

The NLC president argued that the 2019 law, signed on 18 April of that year, had envisaged a review by April 2024. He said the 2024 amendment did not erase that original timetable, adding that a new wage should take effect by 17 April, 2027, under the timeline advanced by the union.

He said negotiations should begin at least six months before the relevant deadline to allow time for preparatory steps and avoid the accumulation of arrears. On that basis, the NLC said the process should commence by 17 October, 2026.

See also  Court bars Aiyedatiwa from contesting 2028 gov election, see why

The union maintained that it was not asking the government to implement a new wage immediately but to begin the administrative and negotiation process required to reach an agreement.

Dingyadi, however, said the National Minimum Wage Act, 2019, as amended by the National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act, 2024, provided for a review every three years.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Fani-Kayode defends Obasanjo over Nigeria Airways liquidation, read details

Published

on

A former Minister of Aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode, has defended former President Olusegun Obasanjo over the liquidation of Nigeria Airways, insisting that the airline’s collapse resulted from years of mismanagement, corruption and mounting debts before Obasanjo returned to power in 1999.

Fani-Kayode, who served as the Minister of Aviation in 2006, said Obasanjo inherited a virtually collapsed airline and had little choice but to liquidate it in 2004.

He stated this in a post on his X account on Thursday while responding to the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, who had earlier accused former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar of hypocrisy over his comments on Nigeria’s economic hardship and insecurity.

In a post published on Wednesday, Keyamo accused the administration in which Atiku served as vice-president of liquidating Nigeria Airways in September 2004, leaving thousands of workers without jobs and their pensions and gratuities unpaid.

The minister said the outstanding entitlements had remained unresolved for years, claiming that some former workers died while waiting for their benefits.

He added that President Bola Tinubu had approved and released N36bn to settle the outstanding obligations, with beneficiaries already receiving payment alerts.

Keyamo also accused Atiku of taking credit for the achievements of the Obasanjo administration when convenient while distancing himself from controversial decisions.

Responding to the debate, Fani-Kayode said it was unfair to blame Obasanjo for the airline’s collapse, arguing that its decline had begun long before his return to office.

“In fairness to President Obasanjo the Nigeria Airways ‘mess’, as you have described it, was established before he came back to power in 1999.

See also  FG reopens fuel imports, Dangote reels from FX losses due to US-Iran war

“And it was indeed a mess but it was not of Obasanjo’s making!

“He met it there after he was sworn in and what he found broke his heart,” Fani-Kayode wrote.

He recalled that when Obasanjo left office as military Head of State in 1979, Nigeria Airways had 32 functional aircraft, experienced pilots and crew members, a first-class management team and an accountable board of directors.

He described the airline at the time as “the pride of the nation”.

However, Fani-Kayode said the situation had deteriorated considerably by 1999, when Obasanjo returned as a civilian president.

“By the time Obasanjo came back to power in 1999, 20 years later, there was only one plane left and it was not functional.

“The rest had vanished together with virtually all of the company’s assets,” he said.

According to him, successive management teams and boards contributed to the airline’s decline through corruption and mismanagement between 1979 and 1999.

He said the company’s liquidation followed chronic insolvency, operational collapse and unsuccessful attempts to revive its operations, including privatisation advice from the International Finance Corporation, which later withdrew.

Fani-Kayode maintained that the Obasanjo administration was justified in refusing to continue providing public funds to the struggling airline.

“This is why Obasanjo liquidated it in 2004 and I believe that he had no choice,” he said.

“There was nothing left to save even though it was a painful decision given the fact that he was one of those that had done so much for that company when he was Military Head of State.”

See also  Nigeria spends $10bn annually on food imports, minister laments

The former minister said the payment of outstanding pensions became a major issue following the liquidation.

He recalled that a committee chaired by the then Head of Service of the Federation, Yayale Ahmed, recommended that funds be released to pay the pensioners.

Fani-Kayode said he subsequently presented a memo to the Federal Executive Council in 2006, advocating the payment of the outstanding entitlements.

However, he said the proposal was rejected because some cabinet members believed former management teams and board members were responsible for the airline’s destruction and did not deserve pensions.

“I did not share that view but sadly I and those that supported me were in a minority and we lost the debate,” he said.

He added that the matter was revisited under the administration of the late President Umaru Yar’Adua, which paid most of the pensioners, while the administration of former President Muhammadu Buhari also made payments.

Fani-Kayode commended Keyamo for ensuring that the remaining pension obligations were settled under the Tinubu administration.

“It is gratifying that under your leadership the remainder of the pensions have been paid. I only wish we had done that when we were in office,” he wrote.

“The pensioners suffered immensely over the years. I have always maintained that paying them was the right thing to do.”

He also referred to Atiku’s position during the Federal Executive Council deliberations on the pension payments but declined to disclose details of the former vice-president’s stance.

“As for His Excellency Waziri @atiku I know what side of the divide he was during that debate in council but I will not share that publicly because whatever decision was finally taken was a collective one,” he said.

See also  Elon Musk becomes first person in history to be worth $500,000,000,000

Fani-Kayode added that members of the administration collectively bore responsibility for the decision and its consequences.

He concluded by commending Keyamo for completing the payment of the outstanding entitlements owed to former Nigeria Airways workers.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending