Connect with us

Business

15% tariff: Nigerians to pay N1tn extra for petrol yearly

Published

on

Nigerians will pay an additional amount of about N1tn (N973.6bn) annually on petrol imports following the Federal Government’s planned introduction of a 15 per cent import tariff on Premium Motor Spirit (petrol).

According to a petrol import trend report obtained from the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, reviewed by The PUNCH on Tuesday, Nigeria imported an average of 26.75 million litres of petrol daily between January and September 2025.

At a projected import tariff rate of N99.72 per litre, as stated in the presidential approval letter for the 15% tariff, the amount that would be spent as tariff for the 26.75 million litres would be about  N2.67bn daily.

When computed over a full year, this adds up to a staggering N973.64bn, which Nigerians will ultimately bear through higher pump prices once the policy is implemented. This amount, while representing additional revenue for government coffers, will translate to a direct increase in fuel expenses for households, transporters, and businesses nationwide.

President Bola Tinubu’s approval of a 15 per cent import policy on PMS and diesel has stirred widespread concern across the oil and gas sector, with operators warning it could raise petrol prices, worsen inflation, and increase import costs, even as the government insists the policy aims to boost local refining and generate revenue.

The President’s approval was conveyed in a letter signed by his Private Secretary, Damilotun Aderemi, following a proposal submitted by the Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service, Zacch Adedeji.

The proposal sought the application of a 15 per cent duty on the cost, insurance, and freight value of imported petrol and diesel to align import costs with domestic market realities.

Adedeji, in his memo to the President, explained that the measure formed part of ongoing fiscal and energy reforms designed to strengthen the naira-based oil economy, ensure price stability, and accelerate the nation’s transition toward local refining capacity in line with the administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda for energy security and economic sustainability.

He also advised the government to ensure transparency by creating a designated Federal Government revenue account managed by the Nigeria Revenue Service, with verification and clearance oversight by the NMDPRA.

“At current CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) levels, this represents an increment of approximately N99.72 per litre, which nudges imported landed costs towards local cost recovery without choking supply or inflating consumer prices beyond sustainable thresholds.

“The core objective of this initiative is to operationalise crude transactions in local currency, strengthen local refining capacity, and ensure a stable, affordable supply of petroleum products across Nigeria,” Adedeji stated.

The FIRS boss noted that the policy is not revenue-driven but corrective, introduced to align import costs with local production realities and prevent duty-free imports from undercutting domestic refineries that are just beginning to recover.

He argued that the new tariff framework would discourage duty-free fuel imports from undercutting domestic producers and foster a fair and competitive downstream environment. He also warned that the current misalignment between locally refined products and import parity pricing has created instability in the market.

“While domestic refining of petrol has begun to increase and diesel sufficiency has been achieved, price instability persists, partly due to the misalignment between local refiners and marketers,” he wrote. The new policy takes effect after a 30-day transition period expected to end on November 21, 2025.

See also  Union Bank completes merger with Titan Trust Bank

Dissenting voices

In response to the development, dissenting voices from industry experts and petroleum marketers have continued to grow louder, with many questioning the timing and potential impact of the 15 per cent import tariff.

The Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria on Tuesday expressed reservations over the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel, describing it as inconsistent with the spirit of market deregulation.

Speaking in an interview with our correspondent, the National Publicity Secretary of IPMAN, Chinedu Ukadike, said independent marketers were not opposed to Tinubu’s directive but faulted the policy’s design, which he argued undermines the principles of a free and competitive market.

“Independent marketers don’t have any problem with the President’s directive, but the only issue is that because of policymakers, the policy doesn’t follow the spirit of deregulation,” Ukadike said.

“Once you liberalise the market and then start to favour a certain section of the industry against others, it means you are putting the cart before the horse. The liberalisation was meant to ensure a free market driven by a willing buyer, willing seller arrangement. The policy should not be an impediment for those who want to import to challenge the local industry.”

He urged the Federal Government to focus on incentivising local refineries rather than imposing tariffs on fuel imports, noting that such measures could distort competition and discourage private participation.

“The government should rather encourage local refineries by giving them crude and reducing taxes for local refiners so that they can lower their prices. The important thing is the price war between refineries and importers. One thing I know is that there is no way domestic products will be cheaper, and marketers will still decide to import. There is no need to put a tariff on importation because they would know importing is not lucrative and would source products locally. So we must do everything to boost our market and solve issues. The government has to allow domestic refiners and importers to compete without government-induced favouritism,” he advised.

According to Ukadike, the natural dynamics of market forces would make imports unattractive once local production becomes cheaper. “There is no need to put a tariff on importation because once domestic products are cheaper, marketers will naturally source locally. The government must allow domestic refiners and importers to compete freely without government-induced restrictions,” he explained.

He warned that any artificial increase in fuel prices would further drive inflation, especially ahead of the Yuletide season when demand for petrol typically rises.

“The most important element of market forces is a price drop. Any addition in pricing will lead to inflation, especially now that Christmas is approaching and more people will be travelling. There must be no shortage of products, and the government must ensure local refining, distribution, and collaboration with stakeholders are in full gear,” Ukadike added.

The Chief Executive Officer of PetroleumPrice.ng, Jeremiah Olatide, described the newly approved 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a double-edged policy, one that could boost government revenue but also worsen the economic hardship faced by Nigerians.

See also  Nigeria emerges major crude supplier to Senegal refinery

Reacting to the development, the oil market analyst said the tariff would significantly impact fuel prices and inflation levels, especially as Nigerians continue to adjust to the effects of the fuel subsidy removal.

“Yes, that calculation is accurate,” he told The PUNCH in response to estimates showing Nigerians may pay nearly N1tn extra annually on petrol imports due to the new tariff. Although the figure can go higher because we are still in the current year, depending on landing costs, too.”

According to him, while the policy represents a strategic move to shore up revenue amid fiscal constraints, it comes at a difficult time for most Nigerians. “For me, it is a good thing that revenue will increase. It’s a smart way to generate income for the country, considering our current expenses and the need for multiple revenue streams.

“But the timing is not really good. Nigerians are still struggling to buy petrol at N800 or N900 per litre. Subsidy removal happened two years ago and has already taken a toll on households. Adding extra expenses through a tariff will hit them hard and definitely push up inflation,” he explained.

He also warned that a combination of the 15 per cent import duty and a proposed five per cent surcharge could further burden consumers and distort market stability.

He said, “The timing is not really good. Two years ago, the subsidy was removed. The effect has not reduced, and we are already facing another issue. The government also plans to begin a five per cent surcharge soon. All of these just make them an additional burden on Nigerians. The government has to be strategic in the rollout.

“I know they are trying to protect local refineries, but there are better policies and ways to support them without having to put more burden on Nigerians. The government could have prioritised a naira-for-crude deal instead.”

The energy expert further noted that the tariff would not necessarily halt fuel importation, as some traders might still find ways to bring in products despite the higher cost.

“I am so sure that some importers will still import. They will find ways to import, not minding the challenges. This policy will not ease out importation of products. Some importers will still look for ways to import, and all of that will still be added to the pump price. Nigerians are craving a price drop, but with these multiple taxes coming into play, that hope seems far away,” he lamented.

He urged the government to adopt policies that strengthen local refining and stabilise the upstream oil sector instead. “The right policy should be enhancing the naira for crude deals to all local refineries. All of them should take feedstock in naira. It would help them grow faster.

“The government should look into the upstream sector and make sure a production of three million barrels per day of crude is ensured. There will be stability with this. Patronage will also increase if prices drop. That’s the only way to achieve price stability and increase market confidence,” he said.

See also  Safe Schools project stalls in 30 states as abductions rise

Meanwhile, the Petroleum Products Retail Outlets Owners Association of Nigeria earlier called for the resuscitation of the country’s refineries before December to avert possible fuel scarcity and price hikes during the festive season.

PETROAN President, Billy Gillis-Harry, described the tariff policy as a bold step toward protecting domestic refineries, stabilising the market, and promoting energy security. He, however, warned that if the measure was poorly implemented, it could cripple fuel importation and render many importers jobless, a situation he said would lead to fuel scarcity.

“NNPC must complete its partnership agreements quickly and start production at Nigeria’s refineries before December to avert any form of fuel scarcity or price hike during the Yuletide season,” he said.

Despite the additional costs Nigerians are expected to bear, the policy decision by the government has also attracted commendations from some stakeholders who view it as a bold step toward boosting revenue and encouraging local refining.

CPPE backs govt

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise threw its weight behind the Federal Government’s newly introduced 15 per cent import duty on refined petroleum products, describing it as a step toward reviving Nigeria’s industrial base and promoting economic self-sufficiency.

The private sector think tank said the measure represents a “strategic protectionist policy” designed to safeguard emerging domestic industries, including local refineries, while stimulating productivity, job creation, and foreign exchange savings.

In a statement signed by the Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Muda Yusuf, the CPPE noted that Nigeria’s excessive dependence on imports over the past decades had weakened its productive capacity, eroded competitiveness, and exposed the economy to external shocks.

It argued that sectors previously protected through calibrated policy interventions, such as cement, flour, and beverages, have recorded remarkable growth and value addition, proving that well-targeted protectionism can strengthen national industries.

The group clarified that its position does not support economic isolationism but a measured approach to industrial protection that helps domestic industries scale up and compete globally.

“Strategic protectionism is not about closing borders or creating monopolies,” CPPE said. “It is about building domestic capacity to engage the global economy from a position of strength.”

The organisation described the 15 per cent import tariff on petrol and diesel as a progressive and corrective policy, adding that it could help level the playing field for domestic refiners such as the Dangote Refinery, NNPCL refineries, and modular plants currently struggling to compete with cheaper imports.

While commending the tariff, CPPE stressed that protection alone would not guarantee industrial success. It urged the government to complement the measure with fiscal incentives, low-cost financing, affordable and reliable energy supply, strategic infrastructure investment, and streamlined regulatory processes.

According to the centre, these support structures are critical to ensuring that protection leads to lower production costs, price stabilisation, and improved consumer welfare in the long run.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

FG urged to expand grazing reserves nationwide

Published

on

Livestock and agriculture stakeholders have called on the Federal Government to fast-track the phased development of grazing reserves beyond the three pilot locations to at least one reserve in each of the six geopolitical zones. They welcomed the initiative as a step in the right direction.

The call followed the Federal Government’s commencement of a phased grazing reserve development programme, beginning with pilot sites at Wawa-Zange in Gombe State, Wase in Plateau State and Kawu in the Bwari Area Council of the Federal Capital Territory.

The Ministry of Livestock Development had said it was working with other ministries, state governments and the private sector to ensure the reserves have “good public schools for the pastoralists, for their children to attend… access roads and… public healthcare.”

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, stakeholders, including the National Secretary of the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria, Aliyu Gotomo, described the move as overdue but cautioned that the scope remained limited.

“Generally, the development of grazing reserves is the most essential thing that is required for pastoralism development. And I think it’s a welcome development that they have started. At least we have started somewhere,” Gotomo said.

He added that properly developed reserves with water, veterinary services and access roads would reduce transhumance and insecurity. “If these things are provided, the major movement from one state to the other in search of greener pastures will be reduced. So, all the conflicts from farmer-herder and other insecurity issues will also be alleviated,” he said.

See also  See why Wole Soyinka snubbed US Embassy’s summons

However, Gotomo urged the government to expand the programme. He said, “Considering about 417 grazing reserves across the states, I think the number is very, very small. They could have started at least with one in each of the political zones,” stressing that the scale did not match “the population of livestock we have in Nigeria and the number of people engaged in pastoralism.”

He also called for deeper engagement with pastoralists, local governments and traditional rulers to ensure ownership and sustainability.

“The actual beneficiaries, the native pastoralists, should be properly engaged… The local government areas and traditional rulers should also be involved so that proper maintenance and sustainability can be adhered to,” he added.

Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agriculture and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, also welcomed the initiative but echoed concerns about regional balance and transparency.

“I think the idea of phased grazing by the Federal Government is a very good initiative. I also believe it will reduce the frequent clashes we are having with farmers,” Banjoko said, adding that it would improve quality and returns for farmers and attract private investment.

He warned, however, that concentration of reserves in limited areas could create new tensions.

“Out of the 417 grazing reserves, except for two in the South-West, I’m not sure there’s any in the South-South or South-East. So, what is the alternative for them?” he asked.

Banjoko urged the government to ensure national spread: “We need to also provide more alternatives in the South-South, South-West and South-East so that we can reduce these frequent clashes in this region as well.”

See also  Petrol remains N865 per litre amid Dangote’s free delivery

He further called for openness in implementation. “People want to see the pictures; people want to see how far they have gone. If there’s enough transparency, then the private sector will come in,” he added, while stressing the need for strong regulations, stakeholder engagement and traceability systems in livestock management.

President of the Commercial Dairy Ranchers Association of Nigeria, Muhammadu Abubakar, said the pilot phase should serve as a model for nationwide rollout.

“The government embarking on a phased grazing reserve development is a good idea. At least the first three should serve as a model,” Abubakar said.

The CODARAN chief noted that the pilots would allow the government to test and refine the approach before scaling up.

“That is where you can experiment with the workability… Look at the downs and the ups and then make amends. Then you will have a model that you just pick and plug in other reserves,” he said.

Abubakar expressed confidence in the public-private approach, noting that challenges would become clearer as implementation progresses.

“When that takes off, we from the private sector will be involved, and then we’re likely going to point out areas that should be corrected or amended,” he added.

The stakeholders agreed that while the pilot programme marks a positive start, expanding the reserves across all zones and carrying communities along would be critical to reducing conflicts and modernising Nigeria’s livestock sector.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Bread prices: No significant drop in flour price, variables — Bakers

Published

on

Premium Breadmakers Association of Nigeria, PBAN, has refuted a viral social media post claiming that the price of flour has plummeted to between N35,000 to N40,000 per 50kg bag. The post further accuses bread makers of “wickedly” refusing to reduce the prices of bread to reflect the drop.

A statement by Emmanuel Onyoh, General Secretary, PBAN, said that the claims are false, and a calculated attempt to incite the Nigerian public against “hardworking bakers who are struggling to stay afloat.”

According to the statement, “The Reality of Flour Pricing as of today, December 16, 2025, the price of a 50kg bag of wheat flour is between N55,000 and N62,000(depending on the brand and where you’re buying from) significantly higher than the fabricated figures circulating online. While some flour millers recently announced a marginal price reduction of approximately N2,000, this is a “drop in the ocean” compared to the overall production deficit”.

“Mathematically, a N2,000 reduction on a bag of flour translates to about N20 saving on the family sized loaf. This small margin is immediately swallowed by the skyrocketing costs of other essential inputs such as yeast, improver, margarine and preservative”.

The General Secretary also revealed what he called “The “Hidden” Costs of Your Daily Bread” . He said, “Needless to say, that besides flour, there are other various ingredients required for operational cost and processes in bread. PBAN members are currently battling a “perfect storm” of economic pressures that make a price reduction impossible at this time,”

He also emphasized the cost of electricity and the diesel required to power industrial ovens and generators, adding that 90% of baking machinery are imported. The replacement cost of equipment

See also  Gas firms supply 180bscf to power plants despite N2.7tn debt

and repairs had increased tremendously in the past few years.

“We are facing unprecedented expenses in fueling and maintaining distribution vehicles to get bread to your neighbourhoods amidst deteriorating road networks. In compliance with the new National Minimum Wage of N70,000, our wage bills have increased significantly. We choose to pay our staff fairly rather than shut down. Bakers are currently burdened by a “spectrum of taxes” from federal, state, and local government agencies, many of which are overlapping and punitive.

“The Premium Breadmakers Association of Nigeria,PBAN, as a responsible association that is mindful of the shrink on disposable income of consumers, we have advised our members to maintain same quality standard and consider introducing bread variants in sizes that falls/fits into various consumer strata.

“We assure the general public that our members shall not hesitate to reduce the prices of bread the moment the cost dynamics and the Nigerian economy reflect a genuine and sustainable downward trend.

“Our primary goal remains the provision of quality, safe, and affordable bread that meets the highest regulatory standards,” he assured.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

FG recorded N30tn revenue shortfall in 2025 – Edun

Published

on

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, opened up on Tuesday that the Federal Government recorded a significant revenue shortfall in the 2025 fiscal year.

He noted that while the Federal Government projected N40.8tn revenue for this year, it ended up making only N10.7tn.

Edun made the disclosure while appearing before the House of Representatives Committees on Finance and National Planning during an interactive session on the 2026–2028 Medium Term Expenditure Framework and Fiscal Strategy Paper.

He recalled that the Federal Government had projected a revenue target of N40.8tn in 2025 to fund the N54.9tn “budget of restoration,” designed to stabilise the economy, secure peace and lay the foundation for long-term prosperity.

However, the minister said current fiscal performance shows that total revenue for the year is likely to end at about N10.7tn.

According to him, the sharp shortfall is largely attributable to weak oil and gas earnings, particularly Petroleum Profit Tax and Company Income Tax from oil and gas companies, alongside persistent underperformance across several revenue subheads.

“The current trajectory indicates that federal revenues for the full year will likely end at around N10.7tn compared to the N40.8tn projection,” Edun told lawmakers.

The minister’s disclosure on Tuesday is in sharp contrast to the declaration by President Bola Tinubu in September that the Federal Government had already met its revenue target

“Today I can stand here before you to brag: Nigeria is not borrowing.

We have met our revenue target for the year and we met it in August,” Tinubu had told members of  The Buhari Organisation who visited him at the Presidential Villa in Abuja.

See also  Terrorism: Police tighten S’East security as Kanu knows fate today

However, speaking on Tuesday, the finance minister admitted that revenue shortfall harmpered the implementation of the N54.9tn 2025 budget.

He explained that although the Federal Government also raised about N14.1tn through borrowing, the combined inflows still fell far short of what was required to fully fund the 2025 budget.

Despite the revenue gap, Edun said the government had continued to meet critical obligations through what he described as prudent treasury management.

He noted that salaries, statutory transfers, as well as domestic and foreign debt service obligations, had been paid as and when due through “skillful, imaginative and creative handling” of available resources.

Providing further insight into expenditure performance, the minister said capital releases to ministries, departments and agencies in 2024 stood at N5.2tn out of a budgeted N7.1tn, representing 73 per cent performance.

He added that total capital expenditure, including multilateral and bilateral-funded projects, reached N11.1tn out of N13.7tn, or 84 per cent.

The minister cautioned that expenditure plans heavily tied to oil revenues must remain flexible, warning against committing the government to spending obligations based on projections that have consistently failed to materialise.

“We must be ambitious, but given the experience of the past two years, spending linked to these revenues must depend on the funds actually coming in,” he said.

Also speaking at the session, the Minister of Budget and National Planning, Atiku Bagudu, said the MTEF and FSP were developed through extensive consultations with key stakeholders, including government agencies, the private sector, civil society organisations and development partners

See also  Nigeria’s eight-month debt service bill hits $2.86bn – CBN

Bagudu acknowledged that revenue assumptions remained a subject of intense debate within the Economic Management Team, explaining that while some members favoured conservative projections informed by historical performance, others argued for ambitious targets to compel revenue-generating agencies to improve efficiency and collection.

He disclosed that although the government retained an oil production target of 2.06 million barrels per day for policy planning, a more cautious assumption of 1.84 million barrels per day was adopted for revenue calculations in the 2026 budget framework.

Earlier, the Chairman of the House Committee on Finance, James Faleke, called for a more critical and realistic approach to budget preparation, warning against bloated budgets that often face serious implementation challenges.

Nigeria’s revenue performance in 2025 has been undermined by a combination of structural and cyclical factors.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending