Connect with us

News

As North’s religionists fritter away Tinubu’s goodwill

Published

on

This piece is six months late. Way back, I had planned to use it to warn a section of religionists of northern extraction not to fritter the fantastic opportunity they had under President Bola Tinubu. He had shown tremendous goodwill towards this section of religionists, doing his best to make them feel at ease against the backdrop of the Muslim-Muslim ticket, which they initially complained about. My decision to warn them was predicated on the activities of some among them. They go to foreign lands to demarket the President, demarket his administration, and demarket Nigeria with its more than 200 million people.

My plan to warn was also predicated on my observation that their drive to get sanctions re-imposed on Nigeria over what they tagged genocide of people of one religion would one day hit some raw nerves in the Tinubu administration. The president’s officials might get exasperated and change their attitude towards this section of religionists for demarketing their superior. And the President, too, might take a dislike to the activities of such people and turn his back. A similar scenario consisting of wild accusations leveled against the state government over insecurity occurred under Malam Nasir El-Rufai, the immediate past governor of Kaduna State. Such wild accusations were the actual origin of the nature of his administration’s relationship with a section of Kaduna State.

While I was waiting for the opportunity to do a piece on this matter, the President made a statement on insecurity, which some had tagged religious persecution. In the course of his visit to Imo State recently, he said, “They lie all over the place that we have religious persecution. Our Muslim brothers and sisters, our Christian brothers and sisters are united. No religious persecution in Nigeria, it is a lie from the pit of hell.” I imagine “they” in his comment refers to foreigners who shout religious persecution, or Nigerians who globetrot to sell genocide tag to foreigners. From the President’s choice of words, I concluded that the demarketing campaign was getting to exasperate him. At this rate, he may change his mind on how he treats this section of North’s religionists, who are making his task more difficult than it already is.

See also  Presidency Gives Update On Edun’s Health Status

Without doubt, the President had superior information on what was going on, particularly in the North-Central zone. Locals know some things, but officers in the intelligence agencies know more, and they report to the President. I guessed it was the reason the President issued the statement he did just before he travelled to Benue State the last time. After another round of violent attacks, he said locals should reconcile their differences and give peace a chance. The Secretary to the Federal Government, George Akume, an indigene of Benue, said a similar thing at the time. It was because they had information regarding the real perpetrators, or their proxies, in that particular attack. Nonetheless, the President was told during his Benue visit that every attack that had ever happened there was an act of genocide. Everything was genocide in a situation where I had written for 10 years about attacks between rival tribes of the same religion in Benue State. The President didn’t argue with anyone on that occasion because he knew what he knew. But this ongoing effort to demarket him and his government to foreign governments is another matter. No leader would fail to find it annoying in the long run, especially now that the US says it’s sanctioning Nigeria.

Since June 2023, I concluded that if the President and the First Lady, Senator Oluremi, previously believed narratives about persecution of only members of one religion before they took office, intelligence reports that they subsequently saw convinced them otherwise. Now, the President knew who did what, what led to it, where the arms came from, and how everything was often swept under the “suspected Fulani herdsmen” narrative prevalent in the media. While he was in Benue State, the President said he expected the army to have arrested perpetrators of the attacks. Later, we saw the names of those who facilitated weapons for the attackers. They were mostly locals, people of the predominant religion in Benue State.

While I was explaining the complex nature of insecurity in the North in the course of the past 10 years, I never doubted in my mind that a time would come when the truth of the claim about religious persecution would be made known. Now, many in government who must have frowned at my position in those years are saying something different. Journalists and others who had been silent are now speaking up when they hear of US sanctions.  I’m surprised any Nigerian would know of attacks in the north-east, north-west, and north-central, yet believed the narrative that only people of one religion were being targeted. Many educated fellows in the south who repeated the false narrative that only herders were responsible for all the insecurity in Nigeria shocked me, and I did mention some of them on this page in the past. I think this is predicated on our general disposition to reach conclusions before we see all the facts, the tendency for selective amnesia, selective empathy, as well as blind religious sentiments that drive many.

I think the President has done so much for a section of religionists in the north, but he’s not been appreciated. This is seen in the manner some rubbish his government to the outside world. Worse, there’s a lack of awareness on the part of the religionists involved that they may be squandering the goodwill they enjoy with the President. As a result, this administration might complete in 2031, and these religionists might still find themselves in the same spot regarding the issues that matter to them. Meanwhile, this is the time they should work closely with the President and his top officials to get a few things on their list done. Like other Nigerians they have an agenda, they should have focused on the agenda under this willing President. Instead, they expend time persuading foreigners to buy the genocide tag, which is what they called insecurity. How this provides practical solutions to problems in their communities remains a question no one is answering.

See also  Putin expresses interest in meeting Trump as White House Presses for Ukraine Peace deal

One of the earliest things the president consciously did for this section of North’s religionists was to appoint one of them as Chief of Defence Staff. That he’s now been removed is the reason I state that this piece is six months late.

I wish I had made the point that I make here while he was still in office. For the former CDS did his best to attend to issues which mattered to his people. And I had planned to ask his people to make the most of his stay in that position while he was there. In Kaduna State, where the outgone CDS came from, fewer attacks were reported in the troubled parts. It was because he paid that area more attention. I had wanted to urge traditional and religious leaders here to devise approaches that would guarantee permanent peace. At the same time, they had a CDS who was willing to assist them to the maximum. Instead, while he was in office, some focused on talking to the US Congress. Now, their own is no longer in the saddle.

The next danger is that with the manner some refuse to sit and find local solutions, the two terms of the President might pass, and this section of North’s religionists wouldn’t consolidate on the gains made in their areas under the current administration. Many of them still don’t get the point that insecurity is local, there’s no general solution, and each area in each state has to identify and deal with the sources of its own problem. They’ve also not accepted the fact that local government councils need all the funds coming from the FG to fight insecurity effectively.

See also  Hantavirus scare: WHO reports three deaths, launches emergency response

As such, no state governor in troubled northern states should hold on to the funds belonging to LGAs. In the President, there’s a willing leader who could assist them to achieve this. If LGAs had all their funds, they could utilise them to provide localised security surveillance, which the FG’s army and police could never provide sustainably. Instead of people here to advocate these things and work on them, their members globetrot to demarket Nigeria, after which they regularly call on the FG’s soldiers to secure them and their farmlands from destructive elements. I hope they realise soon that they’re about to fritter away a lifetime opportunity they have under President Tinubu.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Pentagon restores name of US Pacific Command

Published

on

The Pentagon is set to restore the name of the US Indo-Pacific Command to the US Pacific Command, it said on Tuesday, reversing a 2018 decision.

The renaming will not change the command’s area of responsibility, which stretches from the western part of India to America’s Pacific coastline, the Department of War said in a statement.

Its “fundamental mission and its unwavering commitment to maintaining a free and open theatre alongside regional allies and partners” also remain unchanged, it added.

The name change “honours the command’s deep historical roots, fostering a sense of pride and collective spirit among all who serve in the Pacific,” the department said, without giving additional details.

The US Pacific Command was established by former President Harry Truman after World War II.

It operated under that name for over 70 years before being renamed as the US Indo-Pacific Command in 2018, in a nod to the growing importance of the Indian Ocean in US strategic thinking.

The 2018 name change also came as part of broader efforts by Washington to counter China’s growing influence across the Asia-Pacific domain.

AFP

See also  Okpebholo condemns Edo kidnapping, orders police prob
Continue Reading

News

Labour to engage FG on minimum wage review

Published

on

The Nigeria Labour Congress and the Trade Union Congress said they will restart negotiations with the Federal Government over a new national minimum wage, warning that workers can no longer cope with rising living costs as inflation continues to erode real incomes.

The unions are pushing for what they described as a “genuine living wage” to replace the current framework, which they said no longer reflects Nigeria’s economic realities, particularly sharp increases in food, transport, housing, and healthcare costs.

The position was contained in a joint address delivered at the 114th International Labour Conference in Geneva on Monday, where the unions also rejected any proposal to tax the minimum wage or impose additional fiscal burdens on low-income earners.

Nigeria’s current minimum wage of N70,000 was signed into law on 18 July 2024, in an agreement between organised labour and the federal government. President Bola Tinubu formally announced the wage on 19 July 2024, and it took effect on 29 July 2024.

The agreement originally set a three-year review cycle, shifting from the previous five-year arrangement. However, in January 2025, the Federal Government adjusted the framework, announcing that the minimum wage would now be reviewed every two years, effectively setting 2026 as the next review point.

In light of this, labour leaders said they intend to formally open discussions with the federal government ahead of the July 2026 wage renegotiation deadline, in a bid to prevent the delays that have often hindered previous minimum wage reviews.

“The current Act expires early next year, and we have announced that renegotiation will commence by July 2026 to avoid the painful delays of the past. As soon as we leave here, we shall write again to the government demanding the commencement of the process for renegotiating the national minimum wage,” the unions said.

See also  My cancer treatment to be reduced next year after early diagnosis - King Charles

The labour leaders said workers are already under severe pressure from inflation, currency depreciation, and rising costs across essential services, arguing that official economic indicators do not reflect the daily realities of most households.

They warned that taxing the minimum wage would worsen poverty and deepen economic hardship at a time when many citizens are struggling to meet basic needs.

“We demand nothing less than a genuine living wage that reflects today’s harsh economic realities. We also demand immediate relief measures by governments at all levels until a new minimum wage is signed into law. We reject outright any attempt to tax the minimum wage or impose further burdens on the poor,” the unions said in their communiqué.

The unions stressed that the upcoming negotiations must go beyond nominal wage adjustments and instead focus on protecting real incomes, which they said have been steadily eroded by inflation.

They also urged federal and state governments to introduce short-term relief measures pending the conclusion of negotiations, warning that delays could heighten industrial tensions across the country.

Beyond wage concerns, the labour movement used the Geneva platform to highlight broader economic and social challenges, including insecurity, unemployment, and rising poverty levels.

They said insecurity in several parts of the country has made commuting increasingly dangerous for workers, with killings, abductions, and displacement affecting productivity and livelihoods.

According to the unions, nearly 2,000 people were killed in the first quarter of the year, while millions have been displaced, with entire communities and economic activities disrupted by violence.

See also  India, others reject Tinubu’s envoys, see why

They warned that worsening insecurity could force workers to remain at home as a survival response, escalating tensions beyond traditional labour action if not urgently addressed.

The labour leaders also said about 65 per cent of Nigerians, estimated at roughly 150 million people, are currently living in multidimensional poverty, driven by inflation, job losses, and declining purchasing power.

They argued that while macroeconomic reforms are aimed at stabilisation, they have yet to translate into improved living standards for ordinary citizens.

As the 2027 general elections approach, the unions said they are developing a charter of demands to shape their engagement with political actors and inform their support for candidates, noting that  only political actors who commit to improved security, functional public services, wage reforms, and protection of labour rights would receive their backing.

The labour movement also raised concerns over alleged interference in union affairs in some states, accusing certain governments of undermining democratically elected labour leadership structures.

They emphasised that organised labour would resist any attempt to weaken union independence or impose external control on labour organisations.

As the current wage regime approaches its 2026 review window, the unions said their priority remains securing a wage structure that reflects economic realities and protects workers from further erosion of income.

They maintained that the outcome of the upcoming negotiations would determine whether Nigerian workers receive what they termed a “living wage” or continue to endure worsening economic hardship.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Ribadu, Akpabio advocate tech-driven border control over Insecurity

Published

on

The National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, and President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, on Tuesday called for the deployment of modern technology and stronger regional cooperation to strengthen Nigeria’s border security architecture and address growing security threats across the country.

FILE: Akpabio

They made the call at the opening of the 15th National Security Seminar organised by the Alumni Association of the National Defence College in Abuja.

Represented by the Director of Policy and Strategy at the Office of the National Security Adviser, Yazid Gbemudu, the NSA said Nigeria’s territorial integrity and national stability were closely tied to the effectiveness of its border security framework.

He noted that while Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime borders facilitated trade, regional integration and socio-economic development, they also exposed the country to threats including terrorism, arms trafficking, smuggling, human trafficking, irregular migration and other forms of transnational organised crime.

According to him, weak border governance creates vulnerabilities that can be exploited by criminal and terrorist networks, thereby undermining national security and development efforts.

“A major pillar of Nigeria’s contemporary border security framework is the National Border Management Strategy, which promotes an integrated border management approach.

“The strategy seeks to enhance intelligence collaboration, strengthen border infrastructure, improve surveillance capabilities and modernise border management processes,” he said.

Ribadu said the deployment of Border Management Information Systems and other technological solutions at key entry and exit points had improved data collection, traveller screening and migration monitoring.

“These initiatives demonstrate Nigeria’s commitment to aligning its border management practices with international standards,” he added.

See also  ‘Moles sabotaging military war against banditry’

The NSA stressed the need for the full implementation of an integrated border management system to improve coordination among security, intelligence and law enforcement agencies.

“Effective intelligence sharing, joint operations and harmonised border procedures are essential for addressing contemporary security threats,” he said.

He also advocated increased investment in technology-driven border security solutions.

“Expanding surveillance systems across land, maritime and coastal borders will significantly improve monitoring capabilities and reduce illegal cross-border activities.

“Modern challenges require modern solutions, including biometric identification systems, advanced border monitoring technologies and data-driven security frameworks,” Ribadu stated.

The NSA further emphasised the importance of regional and bilateral cooperation, noting that many of the security challenges confronting Nigeria’s borders were transnational in nature and required coordinated responses among neighbouring countries.

He also called for greater investment in border communities through sustainable development, improved infrastructure and economic opportunities to reduce their vulnerability to criminal exploitation.

“Strengthening Nigeria’s border security architecture is fundamental to ensuring national stability, protecting territorial integrity and promoting socio-economic development,” he said.

Ribadu, however, acknowledged challenges such as porous borders, inadequate infrastructure, limited technological capabilities and gaps in inter-agency coordination, saying they required urgent attention.

“Border security is a shared responsibility that requires the collective efforts of security agencies, government institutions, border communities and international partners,” he added.

Speaking at the event, Akpabio, who was represented by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Defence, Ahmad Lawan, said Nigeria’s extensive land and maritime boundaries posed significant security challenges.

“As a country with extensive land and maritime boundaries, Nigeria faces significant challenges relating to border control, illegal migration, arms trafficking, smuggling and the infiltration of criminal and extremist elements.

See also  Hantavirus scare: WHO reports three deaths, launches emergency response

“It is, therefore, imperative that Nigeria prioritises the strengthening of its border security architecture through improved surveillance, enhanced infrastructure, better inter-agency coordination, technological innovation and stronger regional cooperation,” he said.

Akpabio noted that many of the security threats confronting Nigeria had transnational dimensions, making coordinated responses essential.

He stressed that peace and security remained prerequisites for meaningful national development.

“There can be no meaningful development without peace and security. Porous and poorly managed borders can become vulnerabilities that undermine national security efforts and national stability,” he said.

The Senate President also advocated a whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach to addressing insecurity.

According to him, government institutions, security agencies, civil society organisations, the private sector, traditional institutions, the media and academia all have critical roles to play in safeguarding the country.

Earlier, the Acting President of AANDEC, Commodore Amatare Kpou (retd.), described the seminar as a key platform for promoting informed discourse on national security challenges and opportunities.

Kpou said the theme of the seminar, “Strengthening Nigeria’s Border Security Architecture for National Stability,” was timely, given the growing threats of irregular migration, smuggling, trafficking and other cross-border crimes.

He expressed confidence that the deliberations would generate useful recommendations for policymakers and contribute to efforts aimed at building a safer and more secure Nigeria.

Nigeria shares over 4,000 kilometres of land borders with neighbouring countries and an extensive coastline, making border security a critical component of national security.

Authorities have repeatedly identified porous borders as channels for terrorism, arms smuggling, human trafficking and other transnational crimes.

The Federal Government has in recent years intensified efforts to strengthen border management through technology, intelligence sharing and regional cooperation.

See also  India, others reject Tinubu’s envoys, see why

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending