Connect with us

News

As North’s religionists fritter away Tinubu’s goodwill

Published

on

This piece is six months late. Way back, I had planned to use it to warn a section of religionists of northern extraction not to fritter the fantastic opportunity they had under President Bola Tinubu. He had shown tremendous goodwill towards this section of religionists, doing his best to make them feel at ease against the backdrop of the Muslim-Muslim ticket, which they initially complained about. My decision to warn them was predicated on the activities of some among them. They go to foreign lands to demarket the President, demarket his administration, and demarket Nigeria with its more than 200 million people.

My plan to warn was also predicated on my observation that their drive to get sanctions re-imposed on Nigeria over what they tagged genocide of people of one religion would one day hit some raw nerves in the Tinubu administration. The president’s officials might get exasperated and change their attitude towards this section of religionists for demarketing their superior. And the President, too, might take a dislike to the activities of such people and turn his back. A similar scenario consisting of wild accusations leveled against the state government over insecurity occurred under Malam Nasir El-Rufai, the immediate past governor of Kaduna State. Such wild accusations were the actual origin of the nature of his administration’s relationship with a section of Kaduna State.

While I was waiting for the opportunity to do a piece on this matter, the President made a statement on insecurity, which some had tagged religious persecution. In the course of his visit to Imo State recently, he said, “They lie all over the place that we have religious persecution. Our Muslim brothers and sisters, our Christian brothers and sisters are united. No religious persecution in Nigeria, it is a lie from the pit of hell.” I imagine “they” in his comment refers to foreigners who shout religious persecution, or Nigerians who globetrot to sell genocide tag to foreigners. From the President’s choice of words, I concluded that the demarketing campaign was getting to exasperate him. At this rate, he may change his mind on how he treats this section of North’s religionists, who are making his task more difficult than it already is.

See also  Ifa Religion Council calls on Tinubu to declare national holidays for Isese Festival

Without doubt, the President had superior information on what was going on, particularly in the North-Central zone. Locals know some things, but officers in the intelligence agencies know more, and they report to the President. I guessed it was the reason the President issued the statement he did just before he travelled to Benue State the last time. After another round of violent attacks, he said locals should reconcile their differences and give peace a chance. The Secretary to the Federal Government, George Akume, an indigene of Benue, said a similar thing at the time. It was because they had information regarding the real perpetrators, or their proxies, in that particular attack. Nonetheless, the President was told during his Benue visit that every attack that had ever happened there was an act of genocide. Everything was genocide in a situation where I had written for 10 years about attacks between rival tribes of the same religion in Benue State. The President didn’t argue with anyone on that occasion because he knew what he knew. But this ongoing effort to demarket him and his government to foreign governments is another matter. No leader would fail to find it annoying in the long run, especially now that the US says it’s sanctioning Nigeria.

Since June 2023, I concluded that if the President and the First Lady, Senator Oluremi, previously believed narratives about persecution of only members of one religion before they took office, intelligence reports that they subsequently saw convinced them otherwise. Now, the President knew who did what, what led to it, where the arms came from, and how everything was often swept under the “suspected Fulani herdsmen” narrative prevalent in the media. While he was in Benue State, the President said he expected the army to have arrested perpetrators of the attacks. Later, we saw the names of those who facilitated weapons for the attackers. They were mostly locals, people of the predominant religion in Benue State.

While I was explaining the complex nature of insecurity in the North in the course of the past 10 years, I never doubted in my mind that a time would come when the truth of the claim about religious persecution would be made known. Now, many in government who must have frowned at my position in those years are saying something different. Journalists and others who had been silent are now speaking up when they hear of US sanctions.  I’m surprised any Nigerian would know of attacks in the north-east, north-west, and north-central, yet believed the narrative that only people of one religion were being targeted. Many educated fellows in the south who repeated the false narrative that only herders were responsible for all the insecurity in Nigeria shocked me, and I did mention some of them on this page in the past. I think this is predicated on our general disposition to reach conclusions before we see all the facts, the tendency for selective amnesia, selective empathy, as well as blind religious sentiments that drive many.

I think the President has done so much for a section of religionists in the north, but he’s not been appreciated. This is seen in the manner some rubbish his government to the outside world. Worse, there’s a lack of awareness on the part of the religionists involved that they may be squandering the goodwill they enjoy with the President. As a result, this administration might complete in 2031, and these religionists might still find themselves in the same spot regarding the issues that matter to them. Meanwhile, this is the time they should work closely with the President and his top officials to get a few things on their list done. Like other Nigerians they have an agenda, they should have focused on the agenda under this willing President. Instead, they expend time persuading foreigners to buy the genocide tag, which is what they called insecurity. How this provides practical solutions to problems in their communities remains a question no one is answering.

See also  PHOTOS: Firefighters avert petrol tanker disaster in Kwara

One of the earliest things the president consciously did for this section of North’s religionists was to appoint one of them as Chief of Defence Staff. That he’s now been removed is the reason I state that this piece is six months late.

I wish I had made the point that I make here while he was still in office. For the former CDS did his best to attend to issues which mattered to his people. And I had planned to ask his people to make the most of his stay in that position while he was there. In Kaduna State, where the outgone CDS came from, fewer attacks were reported in the troubled parts. It was because he paid that area more attention. I had wanted to urge traditional and religious leaders here to devise approaches that would guarantee permanent peace. At the same time, they had a CDS who was willing to assist them to the maximum. Instead, while he was in office, some focused on talking to the US Congress. Now, their own is no longer in the saddle.

The next danger is that with the manner some refuse to sit and find local solutions, the two terms of the President might pass, and this section of North’s religionists wouldn’t consolidate on the gains made in their areas under the current administration. Many of them still don’t get the point that insecurity is local, there’s no general solution, and each area in each state has to identify and deal with the sources of its own problem. They’ve also not accepted the fact that local government councils need all the funds coming from the FG to fight insecurity effectively.

See also  Ibom Air bans ‘unruly passenger’ for life after airport row

As such, no state governor in troubled northern states should hold on to the funds belonging to LGAs. In the President, there’s a willing leader who could assist them to achieve this. If LGAs had all their funds, they could utilise them to provide localised security surveillance, which the FG’s army and police could never provide sustainably. Instead of people here to advocate these things and work on them, their members globetrot to demarket Nigeria, after which they regularly call on the FG’s soldiers to secure them and their farmlands from destructive elements. I hope they realise soon that they’re about to fritter away a lifetime opportunity they have under President Tinubu.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Ibom Air bans ‘unruly passenger’ for life after airport row

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  PHOTOS: Firefighters avert petrol tanker disaster in Kwara

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  You’re too big for REA chairmanship, Fayose ’s brother tells ex-governor

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  You’re too big for REA chairmanship, Fayose ’s brother tells ex-governor

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Ogun bondsmen scheme frees over 8,000 defendants, reduces prison crowding

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  Bianca Ojukwu meets Ghanaian officials over ‘Nigerians must go’ protest

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Oba of Benin declares two-week fasting, prayer for Edo

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Bianca Ojukwu meets Ghanaian officials over ‘Nigerians must go’ protest

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending