Connect with us

News

See what shut House of Reps plenary down amid tension

Published

on

Tension over the 2026 budget stalled proceedings at the House of Representatives on Tuesday as lawmakers abruptly adjourned plenary without considering a single item on the day’s Order Paper.

It was an unusual development, last witnessed only when the chamber suspended sittings in honour of a deceased member.

Lawmakers exchanged heated words in the closed-door session that preceded the adjournment, fuelling speculation of growing division within the House over the handling of the budget process.

The House reconvenes today to resume legislative business, with the loan request expected to feature prominently.

Tuesday’s  Order Paper contained 30 bills for the first reading, 16 reports for consideration, eight bills for second reading, and six motions slated for consideration and possible adoption.

Proceedings commenced with the arrival of Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and other principal officers, after which the lawmakers went into a closed-door executive session that lasted for about an hour.

Although no official explanation was provided, sources within the chamber suggested that the session centred on the expiration of the one-week ultimatum issued to the Ministers of Finance, Budget and National Planning as well as the Accountant General of the Federation, to clear outstanding debts owed to indigenous contractors.

Emerging from the closed-door session, the chamber became tense when Ifeanyi Uzokwe from Anambra State repeatedly sought recognition to raise a point of order. His attempts were ignored by the Speaker, who, instead, proceeded to make announcements, including a notice of an emergency meeting of the South West caucus.

Undeterred, Uzokwe persisted, prompting the Speaker to direct him to approach the chair privately. Moments later, the House Leader, Prof Julius Ihonvbere, moved a motion for adjournment, which was adopted, bringing the session to a close.

The PUNCH reliably gathered that President Bola Tinubu had anticipated that the House of Representatives would on Tuesday approve his administration’s request to borrow N1.15 trillion to fund the 2025 budget deficit.

However, that expectation was dashed as lawmakers, aggrieved over issues reportedly relating to their own welfare and constituency funding, refused to consider the request.

President Tinubu had, in a letter to the House leadership last week, sought parliamentary approval for the borrowing plan.

The letter, read by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, stated that the N1.15tn facility was essential to bridge the funding gap in the 2025 fiscal plan.

See also  Ebola emergency watch begins in Lagos, FCT, eight states

Titled ‘Request for the Approval of the National Assembly for a Borrowing Programme to Fund the 2025 Budget Deficit,’ the correspondence had earlier been presented on the floor of the Senate by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

The letter read in part, “I write to kindly request the approval of the National Assembly to establish a N1.15tn borrowing programme in the domestic debt market to close the unfunded deficit gap created by the increase in the budget size, over and above the prior approved revenue and borrowing plans.

“This request is pursuant to the provisions of Section 44(1-2) of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2007, which requires the approval of the National Assembly for all new borrowings by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

“The Right Honourable Speaker of the House of Representatives may wish to note that the National Assembly passed a budget of N59.99tn, an increase of N5.25tn from the 49.74tn budget proposed by the executive. This increase created a budget deficit of N14.10tn.”

At Tuesday’s plenary, members expressed disgust at the Federal Government’s failure to release funds to execute the capital components of the 2024 and 2025 budgets following the one-week deadline it gave last week.

Before plenary began, Ismaila Dabo, the lawmaker representing Toro Federal Constituency in Bauchi State, shared a troubling reflection on the state of the members via the House’s WhatsApp group.

Titled ‘My concern and the sad reality about the 10th National Assembly’, Dabo drew his colleagues’ attention to several issues and called for quick fixes to address them.

He wrote, “When we began the 10th Assembly, the National Assembly budget was less than N160bn. However, in 2024 and 2025, it has increased by more than 100%, now standing at approximately N360bn. This consistent increase has been made in the name of Honourable Members. Unfortunately, the reality today is deeply troubling.”

He added, “The majority of members cannot afford to pay their rents, many members are unable to travel to their constituencies, and several members are facing serious challenges with their banks due to defaults in loan repayments.”

He also noted that “local moneylenders are pursuing members over unpaid debts.”

Dabo added, “Numerous members are facing financial crises that have resulted in litigation. Sadly, members have been reduced to beggars in town, a very embarrassing situation.”

See also  Lagos CP threatens to dissolve task force if police officers violate human rights

He faulted the multiplicity of committees under Speaker Abbas’s leadership, noting that the development is largely to blame for the poor oversight of the various Ministries, Departments and Agencies of Government.

“The proliferation of too many committees has weakened our relevance before government ministries, departments, and agencies. We have become ineffective in discharging our constitutional responsibilities.

“More than five different committees are sometimes assigned to oversee a single ministry or agency, all requesting the same information and inviting the same officials over the same issues. As a result, these agencies have stopped taking the National Assembly seriously. They delay responses, ignore correspondence, and often refuse to appear when invited,” he lamented.

He further expressed displeasure over the wide gap in budgetary allocation between members and Principal Officers of the Green Chamber.

“The disparity between ordinary members and Principal Officers in terms of budgetary allocation is alarming and dangerous. This inequality has exposed many members to political risks. Imagine a situation where your colleague, a Principal Officer, is executing projects worth over N50bn in your state, while you, as a member, are struggling with a project portfolio of less than N1.1bn, which is not even funded. Such an imbalance is unsustainable and unfair,” he stated.

He therefore proposed immediate financial adjustment, saying, “The leadership should make necessary sacrifices by collapsing some budgetary provisions and increasing members’ monthly allowances from N12.5m to N30m. This is achievable, and we can substantiate the feasibility if required.”

The Bauchi lawmaker also called for a re-organisation of the committees and called on the leadership to set up a Review Committee to “rationalise and reduce the number of standing committees to a more effective and manageable size.”

The lawmaker also urged the leadership to ensure “a more balanced budgetary provision for members to close the existing wide gap between them and Principal Officers.”

Driving home his argument, he stated, “Our dignity, relevance, and effectiveness as lawmakers are being eroded. If these issues are not urgently addressed, the 10th Assembly risks becoming the weakest in Nigeria’s democratic history. We must act now for our integrity, for the institution, and for the people we represent.

“I therefore implore all Honourable members to carefully study these issues and deliberate on them with utmost sincerity and commitment, so that together we can restore the honour, strength, and effectiveness of the National Assembly.”

See also  3-storey building accommodating varsity students collapses in Ebonyi

Another House member with knowledge of the matter, told The PUNCH that House spokesman Akin Rotimi, who is the Admin of the WhatsApp group, deleted Dabo’s post.

“But it still found its way to other House platforms,” the lawmaker said.

In an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, the lawmaker, who is from the North Central, added, “Dabo’s brilliant perspective was discussed at the closed-door session alongside the Speaker’s meeting with the President.

“In that meeting, the President gave assurances to fund the remaining 2024 budget and 50 per cent of the 2025 budget. He, however, stated that there was no money because revenue increases are going into debt servicing.

“The President wanted us to approve the loan request today (Tuesday), but we couldn’t achieve that. So, the Presidency would be disappointed with the outcome of today’s sitting. He (President) needed the House to approve the N1.15tn domestic borrowing request to enable him to fund the gaps, but that did not happen.”

Following Dabo’s post, the legislator said the Speaker was quick to declare that the leadership of the House, under his watch, had never siphoned the House budgetary allocation despite the increases.

“The Speaker invited the Chairman, Committee on House Services, Hon Amos Daniel, to give an account of the budget increase in the 2024 budget of N120bn and told members that the increase was used for capital projects, including car parks, National Assembly hospital, National Assembly recreation centre, settlement of official cars, among others.”

Another lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity, added that members frowned on the purchase of standing fans and dustbins from the N120bn.

The Reps member from the South-East stated, “It could have been used to improve members’ running costs in the face of their precarious financial situation.”

Attempts to obtain the House’s official stance on the matter through its spokesman, Akin Rotimi, proved unsuccessful, as he didn’t pick up his calls or reply to the message sent to his WhatsApp as of the time of filing this report.

Similarly, the message sent to Hon. Amos Daniel went unresponded to.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Tinubu unveils renovated National Arts Theatre October 1

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  Russians optimistic as Trump, Putin meet to discuss Ukraine ceasefire

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  UN demands ‘justice’ after Iran school strike

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  Emefiele finally forfeits mansions, $2m to FG

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  UN demands ‘justice’ after Iran school strike

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  FG gets $25.35m Kuwait loan to tackle Kaduna out-of-school crisis

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  FG gets $25.35m Kuwait loan to tackle Kaduna out-of-school crisis

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Women group seeks gender-inclusive, peaceful election in Anambra

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending