Connect with us

News

See what shut House of Reps plenary down amid tension

Published

on

Tension over the 2026 budget stalled proceedings at the House of Representatives on Tuesday as lawmakers abruptly adjourned plenary without considering a single item on the day’s Order Paper.

It was an unusual development, last witnessed only when the chamber suspended sittings in honour of a deceased member.

Lawmakers exchanged heated words in the closed-door session that preceded the adjournment, fuelling speculation of growing division within the House over the handling of the budget process.

The House reconvenes today to resume legislative business, with the loan request expected to feature prominently.

Tuesday’s  Order Paper contained 30 bills for the first reading, 16 reports for consideration, eight bills for second reading, and six motions slated for consideration and possible adoption.

Proceedings commenced with the arrival of Speaker Tajudeen Abbas and other principal officers, after which the lawmakers went into a closed-door executive session that lasted for about an hour.

Although no official explanation was provided, sources within the chamber suggested that the session centred on the expiration of the one-week ultimatum issued to the Ministers of Finance, Budget and National Planning as well as the Accountant General of the Federation, to clear outstanding debts owed to indigenous contractors.

Emerging from the closed-door session, the chamber became tense when Ifeanyi Uzokwe from Anambra State repeatedly sought recognition to raise a point of order. His attempts were ignored by the Speaker, who, instead, proceeded to make announcements, including a notice of an emergency meeting of the South West caucus.

Undeterred, Uzokwe persisted, prompting the Speaker to direct him to approach the chair privately. Moments later, the House Leader, Prof Julius Ihonvbere, moved a motion for adjournment, which was adopted, bringing the session to a close.

The PUNCH reliably gathered that President Bola Tinubu had anticipated that the House of Representatives would on Tuesday approve his administration’s request to borrow N1.15 trillion to fund the 2025 budget deficit.

However, that expectation was dashed as lawmakers, aggrieved over issues reportedly relating to their own welfare and constituency funding, refused to consider the request.

President Tinubu had, in a letter to the House leadership last week, sought parliamentary approval for the borrowing plan.

The letter, read by Deputy Speaker Benjamin Kalu, stated that the N1.15tn facility was essential to bridge the funding gap in the 2025 fiscal plan.

See also  Jonathan revealed why Niger Delta suffered

Titled ‘Request for the Approval of the National Assembly for a Borrowing Programme to Fund the 2025 Budget Deficit,’ the correspondence had earlier been presented on the floor of the Senate by Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

The letter read in part, “I write to kindly request the approval of the National Assembly to establish a N1.15tn borrowing programme in the domestic debt market to close the unfunded deficit gap created by the increase in the budget size, over and above the prior approved revenue and borrowing plans.

“This request is pursuant to the provisions of Section 44(1-2) of the Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2007, which requires the approval of the National Assembly for all new borrowings by the Federal Government of Nigeria.

“The Right Honourable Speaker of the House of Representatives may wish to note that the National Assembly passed a budget of N59.99tn, an increase of N5.25tn from the 49.74tn budget proposed by the executive. This increase created a budget deficit of N14.10tn.”

At Tuesday’s plenary, members expressed disgust at the Federal Government’s failure to release funds to execute the capital components of the 2024 and 2025 budgets following the one-week deadline it gave last week.

Before plenary began, Ismaila Dabo, the lawmaker representing Toro Federal Constituency in Bauchi State, shared a troubling reflection on the state of the members via the House’s WhatsApp group.

Titled ‘My concern and the sad reality about the 10th National Assembly’, Dabo drew his colleagues’ attention to several issues and called for quick fixes to address them.

He wrote, “When we began the 10th Assembly, the National Assembly budget was less than N160bn. However, in 2024 and 2025, it has increased by more than 100%, now standing at approximately N360bn. This consistent increase has been made in the name of Honourable Members. Unfortunately, the reality today is deeply troubling.”

He added, “The majority of members cannot afford to pay their rents, many members are unable to travel to their constituencies, and several members are facing serious challenges with their banks due to defaults in loan repayments.”

He also noted that “local moneylenders are pursuing members over unpaid debts.”

Dabo added, “Numerous members are facing financial crises that have resulted in litigation. Sadly, members have been reduced to beggars in town, a very embarrassing situation.”

See also  Buhari’s voting bloc falls apart as followers pitch tents

He faulted the multiplicity of committees under Speaker Abbas’s leadership, noting that the development is largely to blame for the poor oversight of the various Ministries, Departments and Agencies of Government.

“The proliferation of too many committees has weakened our relevance before government ministries, departments, and agencies. We have become ineffective in discharging our constitutional responsibilities.

“More than five different committees are sometimes assigned to oversee a single ministry or agency, all requesting the same information and inviting the same officials over the same issues. As a result, these agencies have stopped taking the National Assembly seriously. They delay responses, ignore correspondence, and often refuse to appear when invited,” he lamented.

He further expressed displeasure over the wide gap in budgetary allocation between members and Principal Officers of the Green Chamber.

“The disparity between ordinary members and Principal Officers in terms of budgetary allocation is alarming and dangerous. This inequality has exposed many members to political risks. Imagine a situation where your colleague, a Principal Officer, is executing projects worth over N50bn in your state, while you, as a member, are struggling with a project portfolio of less than N1.1bn, which is not even funded. Such an imbalance is unsustainable and unfair,” he stated.

He therefore proposed immediate financial adjustment, saying, “The leadership should make necessary sacrifices by collapsing some budgetary provisions and increasing members’ monthly allowances from N12.5m to N30m. This is achievable, and we can substantiate the feasibility if required.”

The Bauchi lawmaker also called for a re-organisation of the committees and called on the leadership to set up a Review Committee to “rationalise and reduce the number of standing committees to a more effective and manageable size.”

The lawmaker also urged the leadership to ensure “a more balanced budgetary provision for members to close the existing wide gap between them and Principal Officers.”

Driving home his argument, he stated, “Our dignity, relevance, and effectiveness as lawmakers are being eroded. If these issues are not urgently addressed, the 10th Assembly risks becoming the weakest in Nigeria’s democratic history. We must act now for our integrity, for the institution, and for the people we represent.

“I therefore implore all Honourable members to carefully study these issues and deliberate on them with utmost sincerity and commitment, so that together we can restore the honour, strength, and effectiveness of the National Assembly.”

See also  Bayelsa deputy gov sues Assembly over impeachment plot

Another House member with knowledge of the matter, told The PUNCH that House spokesman Akin Rotimi, who is the Admin of the WhatsApp group, deleted Dabo’s post.

“But it still found its way to other House platforms,” the lawmaker said.

In an exclusive interview with The PUNCH, the lawmaker, who is from the North Central, added, “Dabo’s brilliant perspective was discussed at the closed-door session alongside the Speaker’s meeting with the President.

“In that meeting, the President gave assurances to fund the remaining 2024 budget and 50 per cent of the 2025 budget. He, however, stated that there was no money because revenue increases are going into debt servicing.

“The President wanted us to approve the loan request today (Tuesday), but we couldn’t achieve that. So, the Presidency would be disappointed with the outcome of today’s sitting. He (President) needed the House to approve the N1.15tn domestic borrowing request to enable him to fund the gaps, but that did not happen.”

Following Dabo’s post, the legislator said the Speaker was quick to declare that the leadership of the House, under his watch, had never siphoned the House budgetary allocation despite the increases.

“The Speaker invited the Chairman, Committee on House Services, Hon Amos Daniel, to give an account of the budget increase in the 2024 budget of N120bn and told members that the increase was used for capital projects, including car parks, National Assembly hospital, National Assembly recreation centre, settlement of official cars, among others.”

Another lawmaker, who spoke on condition of anonymity, added that members frowned on the purchase of standing fans and dustbins from the N120bn.

The Reps member from the South-East stated, “It could have been used to improve members’ running costs in the face of their precarious financial situation.”

Attempts to obtain the House’s official stance on the matter through its spokesman, Akin Rotimi, proved unsuccessful, as he didn’t pick up his calls or reply to the message sent to his WhatsApp as of the time of filing this report.

Similarly, the message sent to Hon. Amos Daniel went unresponded to.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  I Won’t Delete That Tweet – Sowore Dares Tinubu Govt Over 𝕏 Post

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Benue Assembly suspends ex-Speaker Dajoh over Alia impeachment plot

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Court fixes date for ruling on Sowore’s bail application; read details

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Gen Rabe’s death: Retired Generals seek security reforms, back stronger community defence

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Court fixes date for ruling on Sowore’s bail application; read details

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  I Won’t Delete That Tweet – Sowore Dares Tinubu Govt Over 𝕏 Post

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending