Connect with us

News

Abuja face-off: Wike allies, military veterans differ over calls for sanctions

Published

on

Allies of the Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike, and a coalition of retired military officers on Friday took opposing positions over whether a naval officer Lt. Ahmed Yerima, should face sanctions following his confrontation with the minister at a disputed Abuja land.

Wike and the naval officer clashed on Tuesday over the land purportedly belonging to a former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Zubairu Gambo (retd).

The minister accused the retired military chief of carrying out illegal development on the land and confronted Yerima for allegedly assaulting personnel of the Federal Capital Development Authority, who had gone to halt the ongoing construction.

In a viral video seen by Saturday PUNCH, Wike questioned the military officers’ presence on the disputed land, insisting that the ex-naval chief had no legal documents to back his claim to the property.

However, Yerima told the minister that he and his men were acting on superior orders and could not vacate the land as demanded.

Briefing journalists ahead of the FCT Executive Council meeting on Thursday, Wike condemned what he described as the retired naval chief’s impunity in deploying serving officers to guard the disputed property.

Responding to critics who faulted his visit to the site, the minister said he could not sit idly as a public officer while government officials were being attacked.

‘Tinubu must sack or redeploy Wike’

Speaking at a press conference in Kaduna on Friday, the military veterans slammed the FCT minister and described his actions as “demeaning,” “unacceptable,” and “a direct insult to the Armed Forces and the Commander-in-Chief.”

The coalition, comprising retired generals and other senior military officers from the Army, Air Force, and Navy, called on President Tinubu to sack or redeploy the minister.

The group warned that should the President fail to act, it would “mobilise and occupy” the FCT ministry until Wike was removed.

Delivering the main address, a member of the Board of Trustees of the coalition, Col. Yusuf Ibrahim (retd.), said it was embarrassing for Wike to call the naval officer a fool in the viral clip.

He argued that the naval officer was acting on lawful instructions, adding that insulting him amounted to belittling state authority.

“Not everyone is worthy of certain offices they occupy. We are taken aback that a public office holder could call an officer ‘a fool’ on camera. If Wike was responsible, shouldn’t he have engaged the Chief of Naval Staff privately rather than trying to disgrace a very senior retired general? Who the hell is Wike?” Ibrahim queried.

See also  Gospel singer Taiwo Adegbodu d!es

He added that Wike must apologise to the Nigerian Armed Forces, the young officer involved, and President Tinubu.

Corroborating this, another member of the coalition, Dr. Awwal Abdullahi, who introduced himself as a Deputy Veteran Commander at the briefing, accused the minister of showing a pattern of hostility toward military personnel.

He said, “If the President refuses to sack Wike, we will mobilise and occupy the Ministry of FCT until he is removed.”

Abdullahi described the veterans’ gathering as a representation of the entire retired military community.

He argued that removing the minister would not harm the administration, adding that the veterans could no longer tolerate what they described as Wike’s arrogance.

But speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant on Publicity and Communications to the FCT Minister, Lere Olayinka, said the military veterans’ demand was within their constitutional right.

He added that the minister had clarified his position on Thursday and there was no need for further comments on the matter.

‘Naval officer should be probed’

Throwing its weight behind the minister, a civil society group, the National Coalition for Democratic Integrity, called for an investigation into the conduct of the naval officer.

The coalition said appropriate disciplinary measures consistent with military ethics should be imposed on the officer if found culpable.

The President of the NCDI, Kiki Kiki, in a statement on Friday, condemned the officer’s actions, which he said was grossly disrespectful to a senior government official representing the President.

He noted that obstructing the minister and other officials from performing their duties was a direct affront to the principles of civilian oversight and constitutional order, which are the foundation of Nigeria’s democracy.

Kiki added that the officer’s actions also undermined the core values of discipline and respect that define the military profession.

“Such conduct, if left unchecked, risks sending the wrong signal to the public and to the rank and file within the security services that insubordination and contempt for civil authority can be tolerated. That would set a dangerous precedent.

“We must be unequivocal in condemning the deplorable and utterly unacceptable conduct of Officer Yerima against the FCT Minister. No individual in uniform or in public office is above the law or beyond accountability.

“The dignity of civilian leadership must be respected, not as a matter of ego, but as a safeguard for the order and stability of our democracy,” he added.

Similarly, another group, the Northern Christian Youth Professionals, described the incident as “a grave violation of democratic order” and a dangerous precedent that could undermine civilian authority, the core of constitutional governance.

See also  NIPOST - Nigerians to pay $80 duty on US shipments

In a statement issued on Friday and signed by its Chairman, Isaac Abrak, NCYP argued that preventing a minister from accessing land under his jurisdiction “is ultra vires, unconstitutional, and an affront to the authority of the President,” whose mandate the minister exercises on behalf of Nigerians.

NCYP noted that the land in question was not a military installation but private property reportedly linked to a retired naval admiral, emphasising that no law empowers serving military personnel to guard private estates or obstruct a sitting minister performing official duties.

The group described the alleged deployment as “an egregious overreach of military authority.”

While faulting some of Wike’s comments during the exchange, NCYP insisted that the minister’s tone did not justify what it called “a constitutional breach” by the naval officer and those who authorised his deployment.

The group called on President Bola Tinubu to investigate the deployment of naval personnel to the property and discipline all officers involved.

It also urged Wike to apologise to the military institution for any inappropriate language, while insisting that the Navy must apologise to the FCT Administration and ensure no officer is deployed to block civil authorities again.

Kachikwu defends Wike

Meanwhile, former presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Dumebi Kachikwu, said the Wike–Yerima clash reflected a deeper national intolerance.

Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja on Friday, Kachikwu argued that the controversy exposed growing national intolerance and a tendency to justify illegality once the target was a disliked public figure.

He accused a “vocal minority” of driving the outrage, asserting that their reaction was shaped not by the facts of the incident but by longstanding resentment toward Wike.

Describing the uproar as “unacceptable,” Kachikwu urged President Tinubu to intervene, noting that the behaviour of some senior officials, including the Minister of Defence, suggested they had “taken sides” without proper context.

He said, “Speaking on this odious saga between Wike and Yerima is extremely difficult because it is another example of a very vocal minority having their say and their way.

“Everyone tries to avoid this vocal minority, especially when they are baying for blood, and in this case, they believe they finally have the minister where they want him, defenceless.

“Today I weep for Nigeria because we are becoming a nation fuelled by hate for anything government. Their hatred for this man, perceived as a bully and the President’s bulldog, has clouded their judgement.”

See also  Health minister, manufacturers clash over sugary drink levy

Questioning selective judgment, Kachikwu argued that both Wike and the naval officer had been provoked during the clash, yet public anger focused solely on the minister.

He maintained that Wike acted in his official capacity as FCT minister and presidential representative, insisting that the officer had obstructed legitimate government work while acting on the instructions of a retired general.

Military sources rule out sanctions

Meanwhile, indications suggest that Yerima may not face any disciplinary action despite the public attention the incident has generated.

The Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, said the government was investigating the matter but stressed that military personnel on legitimate duty would not be punished.

The minister’s clarification came in response to strong reactions from ex-military chiefs, including former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), who demanded that Wike apologise to Tinubu, the Nigerian Armed Forces, and the officer involved.

Buratai, in a Facebook post on Tuesday night, described Wike’s conduct as inappropriate and disrespectful to the military.

Speaking in a separate interview with our correspondent on Friday, senior military officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, ruled out sanctions for the naval officer, insisting he acted within military procedure.

One officer said, “The Nigerian Armed Forces operate strictly within the legal framework of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which defines the limits of both civil authority and military engagement.

“Once troops are lawfully deployed under approved orders, their allegiance is to their operational command and the Constitution, not to any transient expression of political will.”

Another senior officer reinforced this stance, saying the officer fulfilled his obligation to the military leadership.

“He did what the military leadership instructed,” the officer said.

“The legality of military action is guided by orders, not optics. Once deployed, an officer’s duty is to protect life, maintain order, and uphold the Constitution within clearly defined rules of engagement.

“Political intrusion into that space, however well-intentioned, undermines not only command authority but also the delicate balance of Nigeria’s internal security framework.”

He added, “The military’s authority rests not on intimidation, but on discipline; not on display, but on duty.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  VIDEO - Dangote Trucks Move Freely in China But Face Roadblocks in Nigeria | Must Watch!

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  Delta reviews dress code for civil servants, bans bushy beards, artificial nails

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Veteran Journalist Is Dead

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Rivers achieves 95% HIV testing among pregnant women — Institute

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Why Nigerian Airports Do Not Have Wi-Fi – Tinubu’s Minister, Keyamo Explains

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Obasanjo: See why I rejected El-Rufai as my successor

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending