Connect with us

News

Abuja face-off: Wike allies, military veterans differ over calls for sanctions

Published

on

Allies of the Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike, and a coalition of retired military officers on Friday took opposing positions over whether a naval officer Lt. Ahmed Yerima, should face sanctions following his confrontation with the minister at a disputed Abuja land.

Wike and the naval officer clashed on Tuesday over the land purportedly belonging to a former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Zubairu Gambo (retd).

The minister accused the retired military chief of carrying out illegal development on the land and confronted Yerima for allegedly assaulting personnel of the Federal Capital Development Authority, who had gone to halt the ongoing construction.

In a viral video seen by Saturday PUNCH, Wike questioned the military officers’ presence on the disputed land, insisting that the ex-naval chief had no legal documents to back his claim to the property.

However, Yerima told the minister that he and his men were acting on superior orders and could not vacate the land as demanded.

Briefing journalists ahead of the FCT Executive Council meeting on Thursday, Wike condemned what he described as the retired naval chief’s impunity in deploying serving officers to guard the disputed property.

Responding to critics who faulted his visit to the site, the minister said he could not sit idly as a public officer while government officials were being attacked.

‘Tinubu must sack or redeploy Wike’

Speaking at a press conference in Kaduna on Friday, the military veterans slammed the FCT minister and described his actions as “demeaning,” “unacceptable,” and “a direct insult to the Armed Forces and the Commander-in-Chief.”

The coalition, comprising retired generals and other senior military officers from the Army, Air Force, and Navy, called on President Tinubu to sack or redeploy the minister.

The group warned that should the President fail to act, it would “mobilise and occupy” the FCT ministry until Wike was removed.

Delivering the main address, a member of the Board of Trustees of the coalition, Col. Yusuf Ibrahim (retd.), said it was embarrassing for Wike to call the naval officer a fool in the viral clip.

He argued that the naval officer was acting on lawful instructions, adding that insulting him amounted to belittling state authority.

“Not everyone is worthy of certain offices they occupy. We are taken aback that a public office holder could call an officer ‘a fool’ on camera. If Wike was responsible, shouldn’t he have engaged the Chief of Naval Staff privately rather than trying to disgrace a very senior retired general? Who the hell is Wike?” Ibrahim queried.

See also  2027 battle: Opposition rages as court scraps ADC, four parties

He added that Wike must apologise to the Nigerian Armed Forces, the young officer involved, and President Tinubu.

Corroborating this, another member of the coalition, Dr. Awwal Abdullahi, who introduced himself as a Deputy Veteran Commander at the briefing, accused the minister of showing a pattern of hostility toward military personnel.

He said, “If the President refuses to sack Wike, we will mobilise and occupy the Ministry of FCT until he is removed.”

Abdullahi described the veterans’ gathering as a representation of the entire retired military community.

He argued that removing the minister would not harm the administration, adding that the veterans could no longer tolerate what they described as Wike’s arrogance.

But speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant on Publicity and Communications to the FCT Minister, Lere Olayinka, said the military veterans’ demand was within their constitutional right.

He added that the minister had clarified his position on Thursday and there was no need for further comments on the matter.

‘Naval officer should be probed’

Throwing its weight behind the minister, a civil society group, the National Coalition for Democratic Integrity, called for an investigation into the conduct of the naval officer.

The coalition said appropriate disciplinary measures consistent with military ethics should be imposed on the officer if found culpable.

The President of the NCDI, Kiki Kiki, in a statement on Friday, condemned the officer’s actions, which he said was grossly disrespectful to a senior government official representing the President.

He noted that obstructing the minister and other officials from performing their duties was a direct affront to the principles of civilian oversight and constitutional order, which are the foundation of Nigeria’s democracy.

Kiki added that the officer’s actions also undermined the core values of discipline and respect that define the military profession.

“Such conduct, if left unchecked, risks sending the wrong signal to the public and to the rank and file within the security services that insubordination and contempt for civil authority can be tolerated. That would set a dangerous precedent.

“We must be unequivocal in condemning the deplorable and utterly unacceptable conduct of Officer Yerima against the FCT Minister. No individual in uniform or in public office is above the law or beyond accountability.

“The dignity of civilian leadership must be respected, not as a matter of ego, but as a safeguard for the order and stability of our democracy,” he added.

Similarly, another group, the Northern Christian Youth Professionals, described the incident as “a grave violation of democratic order” and a dangerous precedent that could undermine civilian authority, the core of constitutional governance.

See also  FG sets up presidential taskforce to forestall Ebola outbreak

In a statement issued on Friday and signed by its Chairman, Isaac Abrak, NCYP argued that preventing a minister from accessing land under his jurisdiction “is ultra vires, unconstitutional, and an affront to the authority of the President,” whose mandate the minister exercises on behalf of Nigerians.

NCYP noted that the land in question was not a military installation but private property reportedly linked to a retired naval admiral, emphasising that no law empowers serving military personnel to guard private estates or obstruct a sitting minister performing official duties.

The group described the alleged deployment as “an egregious overreach of military authority.”

While faulting some of Wike’s comments during the exchange, NCYP insisted that the minister’s tone did not justify what it called “a constitutional breach” by the naval officer and those who authorised his deployment.

The group called on President Bola Tinubu to investigate the deployment of naval personnel to the property and discipline all officers involved.

It also urged Wike to apologise to the military institution for any inappropriate language, while insisting that the Navy must apologise to the FCT Administration and ensure no officer is deployed to block civil authorities again.

Kachikwu defends Wike

Meanwhile, former presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Dumebi Kachikwu, said the Wike–Yerima clash reflected a deeper national intolerance.

Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja on Friday, Kachikwu argued that the controversy exposed growing national intolerance and a tendency to justify illegality once the target was a disliked public figure.

He accused a “vocal minority” of driving the outrage, asserting that their reaction was shaped not by the facts of the incident but by longstanding resentment toward Wike.

Describing the uproar as “unacceptable,” Kachikwu urged President Tinubu to intervene, noting that the behaviour of some senior officials, including the Minister of Defence, suggested they had “taken sides” without proper context.

He said, “Speaking on this odious saga between Wike and Yerima is extremely difficult because it is another example of a very vocal minority having their say and their way.

“Everyone tries to avoid this vocal minority, especially when they are baying for blood, and in this case, they believe they finally have the minister where they want him, defenceless.

“Today I weep for Nigeria because we are becoming a nation fuelled by hate for anything government. Their hatred for this man, perceived as a bully and the President’s bulldog, has clouded their judgement.”

See also  Lawyer - Natasha to resume Senate after London trip

Questioning selective judgment, Kachikwu argued that both Wike and the naval officer had been provoked during the clash, yet public anger focused solely on the minister.

He maintained that Wike acted in his official capacity as FCT minister and presidential representative, insisting that the officer had obstructed legitimate government work while acting on the instructions of a retired general.

Military sources rule out sanctions

Meanwhile, indications suggest that Yerima may not face any disciplinary action despite the public attention the incident has generated.

The Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, said the government was investigating the matter but stressed that military personnel on legitimate duty would not be punished.

The minister’s clarification came in response to strong reactions from ex-military chiefs, including former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), who demanded that Wike apologise to Tinubu, the Nigerian Armed Forces, and the officer involved.

Buratai, in a Facebook post on Tuesday night, described Wike’s conduct as inappropriate and disrespectful to the military.

Speaking in a separate interview with our correspondent on Friday, senior military officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, ruled out sanctions for the naval officer, insisting he acted within military procedure.

One officer said, “The Nigerian Armed Forces operate strictly within the legal framework of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which defines the limits of both civil authority and military engagement.

“Once troops are lawfully deployed under approved orders, their allegiance is to their operational command and the Constitution, not to any transient expression of political will.”

Another senior officer reinforced this stance, saying the officer fulfilled his obligation to the military leadership.

“He did what the military leadership instructed,” the officer said.

“The legality of military action is guided by orders, not optics. Once deployed, an officer’s duty is to protect life, maintain order, and uphold the Constitution within clearly defined rules of engagement.

“Political intrusion into that space, however well-intentioned, undermines not only command authority but also the delicate balance of Nigeria’s internal security framework.”

He added, “The military’s authority rests not on intimidation, but on discipline; not on display, but on duty.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  2027 battle: Opposition rages as court scraps ADC, four parties

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  FG scraps three-month terminal leave for civil servants; read why

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  FG sets up presidential taskforce to forestall Ebola outbreak

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  LASBCA reaffirms commitment to enforcing building regulations

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  Lawyer - Natasha to resume Senate after London trip

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  How Awujale Made APC, Buhari President – Bakare

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  2027 battle: Opposition rages as court scraps ADC, four parties

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  2027: N’Assembly eyes Jan 16 for presidential poll, suspends Electoral Bill harmonisation

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending