Connect with us

News

Abuja face-off: Wike allies, military veterans differ over calls for sanctions

Published

on

Allies of the Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike, and a coalition of retired military officers on Friday took opposing positions over whether a naval officer Lt. Ahmed Yerima, should face sanctions following his confrontation with the minister at a disputed Abuja land.

Wike and the naval officer clashed on Tuesday over the land purportedly belonging to a former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Zubairu Gambo (retd).

The minister accused the retired military chief of carrying out illegal development on the land and confronted Yerima for allegedly assaulting personnel of the Federal Capital Development Authority, who had gone to halt the ongoing construction.

In a viral video seen by Saturday PUNCH, Wike questioned the military officers’ presence on the disputed land, insisting that the ex-naval chief had no legal documents to back his claim to the property.

However, Yerima told the minister that he and his men were acting on superior orders and could not vacate the land as demanded.

Briefing journalists ahead of the FCT Executive Council meeting on Thursday, Wike condemned what he described as the retired naval chief’s impunity in deploying serving officers to guard the disputed property.

Responding to critics who faulted his visit to the site, the minister said he could not sit idly as a public officer while government officials were being attacked.

‘Tinubu must sack or redeploy Wike’

Speaking at a press conference in Kaduna on Friday, the military veterans slammed the FCT minister and described his actions as “demeaning,” “unacceptable,” and “a direct insult to the Armed Forces and the Commander-in-Chief.”

The coalition, comprising retired generals and other senior military officers from the Army, Air Force, and Navy, called on President Tinubu to sack or redeploy the minister.

The group warned that should the President fail to act, it would “mobilise and occupy” the FCT ministry until Wike was removed.

Delivering the main address, a member of the Board of Trustees of the coalition, Col. Yusuf Ibrahim (retd.), said it was embarrassing for Wike to call the naval officer a fool in the viral clip.

He argued that the naval officer was acting on lawful instructions, adding that insulting him amounted to belittling state authority.

“Not everyone is worthy of certain offices they occupy. We are taken aback that a public office holder could call an officer ‘a fool’ on camera. If Wike was responsible, shouldn’t he have engaged the Chief of Naval Staff privately rather than trying to disgrace a very senior retired general? Who the hell is Wike?” Ibrahim queried.

See also  Trump’s statement opportunity to end killings in Nigeria — Northern CAN

He added that Wike must apologise to the Nigerian Armed Forces, the young officer involved, and President Tinubu.

Corroborating this, another member of the coalition, Dr. Awwal Abdullahi, who introduced himself as a Deputy Veteran Commander at the briefing, accused the minister of showing a pattern of hostility toward military personnel.

He said, “If the President refuses to sack Wike, we will mobilise and occupy the Ministry of FCT until he is removed.”

Abdullahi described the veterans’ gathering as a representation of the entire retired military community.

He argued that removing the minister would not harm the administration, adding that the veterans could no longer tolerate what they described as Wike’s arrogance.

But speaking with Saturday PUNCH, the Senior Special Assistant on Publicity and Communications to the FCT Minister, Lere Olayinka, said the military veterans’ demand was within their constitutional right.

He added that the minister had clarified his position on Thursday and there was no need for further comments on the matter.

‘Naval officer should be probed’

Throwing its weight behind the minister, a civil society group, the National Coalition for Democratic Integrity, called for an investigation into the conduct of the naval officer.

The coalition said appropriate disciplinary measures consistent with military ethics should be imposed on the officer if found culpable.

The President of the NCDI, Kiki Kiki, in a statement on Friday, condemned the officer’s actions, which he said was grossly disrespectful to a senior government official representing the President.

He noted that obstructing the minister and other officials from performing their duties was a direct affront to the principles of civilian oversight and constitutional order, which are the foundation of Nigeria’s democracy.

Kiki added that the officer’s actions also undermined the core values of discipline and respect that define the military profession.

“Such conduct, if left unchecked, risks sending the wrong signal to the public and to the rank and file within the security services that insubordination and contempt for civil authority can be tolerated. That would set a dangerous precedent.

“We must be unequivocal in condemning the deplorable and utterly unacceptable conduct of Officer Yerima against the FCT Minister. No individual in uniform or in public office is above the law or beyond accountability.

“The dignity of civilian leadership must be respected, not as a matter of ego, but as a safeguard for the order and stability of our democracy,” he added.

Similarly, another group, the Northern Christian Youth Professionals, described the incident as “a grave violation of democratic order” and a dangerous precedent that could undermine civilian authority, the core of constitutional governance.

See also  U.S. Court Jails Nigerian Fraudster Oluwaseun Adekoya To 20 Years For Impersonation And 2M U.S.Dollars Fraud

In a statement issued on Friday and signed by its Chairman, Isaac Abrak, NCYP argued that preventing a minister from accessing land under his jurisdiction “is ultra vires, unconstitutional, and an affront to the authority of the President,” whose mandate the minister exercises on behalf of Nigerians.

NCYP noted that the land in question was not a military installation but private property reportedly linked to a retired naval admiral, emphasising that no law empowers serving military personnel to guard private estates or obstruct a sitting minister performing official duties.

The group described the alleged deployment as “an egregious overreach of military authority.”

While faulting some of Wike’s comments during the exchange, NCYP insisted that the minister’s tone did not justify what it called “a constitutional breach” by the naval officer and those who authorised his deployment.

The group called on President Bola Tinubu to investigate the deployment of naval personnel to the property and discipline all officers involved.

It also urged Wike to apologise to the military institution for any inappropriate language, while insisting that the Navy must apologise to the FCT Administration and ensure no officer is deployed to block civil authorities again.

Kachikwu defends Wike

Meanwhile, former presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, Dumebi Kachikwu, said the Wike–Yerima clash reflected a deeper national intolerance.

Speaking at a press briefing in Abuja on Friday, Kachikwu argued that the controversy exposed growing national intolerance and a tendency to justify illegality once the target was a disliked public figure.

He accused a “vocal minority” of driving the outrage, asserting that their reaction was shaped not by the facts of the incident but by longstanding resentment toward Wike.

Describing the uproar as “unacceptable,” Kachikwu urged President Tinubu to intervene, noting that the behaviour of some senior officials, including the Minister of Defence, suggested they had “taken sides” without proper context.

He said, “Speaking on this odious saga between Wike and Yerima is extremely difficult because it is another example of a very vocal minority having their say and their way.

“Everyone tries to avoid this vocal minority, especially when they are baying for blood, and in this case, they believe they finally have the minister where they want him, defenceless.

“Today I weep for Nigeria because we are becoming a nation fuelled by hate for anything government. Their hatred for this man, perceived as a bully and the President’s bulldog, has clouded their judgement.”

See also  Obasanjo bombs Atiku: You’re my biggest mistake

Questioning selective judgment, Kachikwu argued that both Wike and the naval officer had been provoked during the clash, yet public anger focused solely on the minister.

He maintained that Wike acted in his official capacity as FCT minister and presidential representative, insisting that the officer had obstructed legitimate government work while acting on the instructions of a retired general.

Military sources rule out sanctions

Meanwhile, indications suggest that Yerima may not face any disciplinary action despite the public attention the incident has generated.

The Minister of Defence, Mohammed Badaru, said the government was investigating the matter but stressed that military personnel on legitimate duty would not be punished.

The minister’s clarification came in response to strong reactions from ex-military chiefs, including former Chief of Army Staff, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai (retd.), who demanded that Wike apologise to Tinubu, the Nigerian Armed Forces, and the officer involved.

Buratai, in a Facebook post on Tuesday night, described Wike’s conduct as inappropriate and disrespectful to the military.

Speaking in a separate interview with our correspondent on Friday, senior military officials, who requested anonymity because they were not authorised to speak publicly, ruled out sanctions for the naval officer, insisting he acted within military procedure.

One officer said, “The Nigerian Armed Forces operate strictly within the legal framework of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), which defines the limits of both civil authority and military engagement.

“Once troops are lawfully deployed under approved orders, their allegiance is to their operational command and the Constitution, not to any transient expression of political will.”

Another senior officer reinforced this stance, saying the officer fulfilled his obligation to the military leadership.

“He did what the military leadership instructed,” the officer said.

“The legality of military action is guided by orders, not optics. Once deployed, an officer’s duty is to protect life, maintain order, and uphold the Constitution within clearly defined rules of engagement.

“Political intrusion into that space, however well-intentioned, undermines not only command authority but also the delicate balance of Nigeria’s internal security framework.”

He added, “The military’s authority rests not on intimidation, but on discipline; not on display, but on duty.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SEE FULL LIST: NJC recommends 28 candidates for judicial appointments

Published

on

The National Judicial Council (NJC) has recommended 28 candidates for appointment as judicial officers across six states, including 24 candidates for various State High Courts.

The recommendations cover the High Courts of Kano, Ebonyi, Edo, Adamawa and Ogun states, the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal and Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The Council announced the recommendations in a statement issued on Wednesday by its Deputy Director of Information, Kemi Babalola-Ogedengbe.

It said the decisions were taken at its 112th meeting held on November 3, 2026, under the chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Motonmori Olatokunbo Kekere-Ekun.

According to the Council, one candidate was recommended as Grand Kadi of the Plateau State Sharia Court of Appeal, while another was recommended as Kadi of the Adamawa State Sharia Court of Appeal.

Two others were recommended as judges of the Adamawa State Customary Court of Appeal.

The appointment includes “24 High Court candidates and four candidates for the Sharia and Customary Courts of Appeal.”

The full list of the 28 recommended candidates is as follows:

PLATEAU STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (GRAND KADI)

1. Tijjani Jibrin Zololo

KANO STATE HIGH COURT

2. Nafisah Yusuf Hassan
3. Halima Yahuza Ahmad
4. Abdullahi Abdulsalam Bature
5. Musa Ibrahim Umar

EBONYI STATE HIGH COURT

6. Dickson Edmund Amaga

EDO STATE HIGH COURT

7. Benson Osagie Osawaru
8. Taiye Osayanmon Omoruyi
9. Dorothy Ibhade Adamaigbo
10. Festus Osagie Usiobaifo
11. Pius Idemudia Oiwoh
12. Majebi Samuel Amune
13. Emike Jessica Imuekemhe

See also  FG tightens payroll checks as salaries gulp N1.96tn, read details

ADAMAWA STATE HIGH COURT

14. Aminu Sa’ad
15. Ibrahim Ulenda Musa
16. Sadiq Giwa
17. Musa Bala Mijinyawa
18. Japhet Ibrahim
19. Aliyu Bakari
20. Yakubu Ahmadu

OGUN STATE HIGH COURT

21. Olakulehin Luqman Abiola Oke
22. Adebimpe Folusho Obienu
23. Fatimat Adeola Daudu
24. Rafiat Bolanle Kadiri
25. Oludotun Olaniyi Osho

ADAMAWA STATE SHARIA COURT OF APPEAL (KADI)

26. Abubakar Ishaku

ADAMAWA STATE CUSTOMARY COURT OF APPEAL

27. Elshama Gwama Dimas
28. David Benjamin Pembi

The NJC said all the recommended candidates were expected to be sworn in by their respective state governors without delay.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

JD Vance reveals Iran war cost Republicans midterm elections, read details

Published

on

United States Vice President JD Vance has blamed the Iran war for the Republican Party’s poor performance in the 2026 midterm elections, saying many supporters of President Donald Trump switched allegiance to Democrats over dissatisfaction with the conflict.

Vance said this in a post on his X handle on Wednesday, arguing that the party’s defeat was not primarily caused by poor voter turnout but by the defection of voters who supported the Trump-Vance ticket in 2024.

He said data analysis conducted by his team before the elections had shown that Republican supporters were turning out in significant numbers, despite opinion polls predicting a major Democratic victory.

“One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was ‘composition’—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win,” he said.

Vance explained that although turnout was encouraging in several states, a member of his data team had warned him that many Republican voters were angry and might not vote for the party.

“Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was nine points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024,” he said.

“But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.”

The Vice President acknowledged that the party might have failed to communicate its economic policies effectively, particularly on the cost of living and inflation.

However, he said the major reasons voters abandoned the Republicans were concerns about the war, economic hardship, America’s foreign policy priorities and its relationship with Israel.

See also  Join protest, risk punishment, N’Assembly warns legislative workers

According to Vance, a pollster who accurately predicted the election outcome identified four major demands among former Republican supporters who switched to the Democrats.

The demands were to end the war, prioritise the cost of living and inflation, put America first and change the country’s relationship with Israel.

“The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night,” Vance stated.

He also defended television personality Rachel Campos-Duffy, saying her earlier call for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict had proved politically sound.

Vance warned against attempts by Republican establishment figures to attribute the party’s electoral setback to other issues, particularly immigration policy.

He said he was open to reviewing immigration enforcement strategies, including targeting businesses that employ undocumented workers, but rejected calls for amnesty.

“Anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you,” he said.

The Vice President challenged those who believed the war was worth the political cost to defend that position openly, noting that the defeat could cost Republicans control of the Senate for the next six years.

“If you’d like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next six years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay,” he said.

“Agree or disagree, that’s at least honest.”

Despite the setback, Vance expressed optimism about the country’s future, urging disappointed Republican supporters to channel their anger into rebuilding the party and electing candidates who share their political views.

“Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country,” he added.

See also  Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

UK to strengthen immigration enforcement with facial recognition

Published

on

The United Kingdom government plans to expand live facial recognition technology to strengthen immigration enforcement and identify individuals who have violated immigration rules.

The initiative, being developed by the Home Office, could see facial recognition cameras deployed at transport hubs and public events to help immigration officers identify people who have overstayed their visas, entered the country unlawfully or breached their immigration conditions.

According to policy documents published in October and sighted by PUNCH Online on Thursday, the proposed expansion could extend the technology’s use to general immigration enforcement, including civil immigration violations that do not necessarily involve criminal offences.

The development comes as Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood seeks to intensify immigration enforcement through increased funding, additional personnel and expanded deportation operations.

The Home Office said the technology would help officers identify individuals subject to removal proceedings and those attempting to re-enter the UK unlawfully.

The policy documents also suggest that facial recognition could reduce the need for repeated enforcement visits to residential properties and workplaces.

Authorities have already conducted three trials of the technology at Holyhead port in north Wales between November 2025 and February 2026. The trials focused on identifying individuals travelling from Ireland who were subject to deportation orders or wanted over immigration-related criminal offences.

The programme has now entered its formal delivery phase, with officials considering wider deployments at transport hubs and large public gatherings.

A Home Office spokesperson confirmed that further trials were being considered while the government examined the potential benefits and implications of the technology.

See also  FG tightens payroll checks as salaries gulp N1.96tn, read details

U K Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said: “Facial recognition technology has been the biggest breakthrough for catching criminals since DNA matching, already helping police take thousands of dangerous criminals off our streets.

“The benefits are clear, but we must ensure that its use is fair, safe and proportionate.

“It is right we put in place clear laws to ensure that the use of this technology is watertight, so the public can have confidence that these tools, which are vital to our safety, are used responsibly too.”

However, the proposed expansion has raised concerns among civil liberties organisations and migrant rights advocates over privacy, surveillance and the possibility of inaccurate identification.

The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants described the development as a significant escalation of immigration enforcement powers, while the Open Rights Group questioned the transparency of the plans, public consent and the absence of comprehensive legislation governing facial recognition.

Critics have also warned that the technology could disproportionately affect people of colour because of concerns about identification accuracy.

Meanwhile, Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner William Webster has questioned whether existing regulatory arrangements are sufficient to oversee the expanding use of facial recognition across government agencies.

Under the proposed policy, individuals under 18 will not be included on facial recognition watchlists.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending