Connect with us

News

Federal roads spending soars 489% to N3.23tn

Published

on

The Federal Government has proposed spending N3.23tn on the construction and rehabilitation of federal roads in the 2026 budget, marking a sharp increase in capital allocation to the transport sector as it intensifies efforts to complete long-delayed highways and repair critical corridors nationwide.

The proposed spending represents an increase of about 489 per cent in two years compared to N548.56bn allocated to road projects in the 2024 budget, highlighting a significant shift in fiscal priority towards road infrastructure.

Budgetary documents further show that the Ministry of Works received N1.013tn for the construction and rehabilitation of 468 federal roads in the 2025 budget, up from the 2024 allocation.

The proposed 2026 figure more than triples the 2025 provision, underscoring the government’s renewed commitment to accelerate the delivery of inherited projects and flagship highway developments nationwide.

The government has repeatedly said improved road infrastructure is critical to lowering transport costs, boosting trade, and supporting economic growth, amid rising concerns over the state of key federal highways.

A review of the proposed 2026 budget estimates presented to the National Assembly by President Bola Tinubu and released by the Budget Office revealed that the government has proposed to spend N1.39tn on the construction and provision of roads and N285.62bn on rehabilitation and repair works in the 2026 fiscal year, according to details of the Ministry of Works’ capital budget proposal.

In addition, N1.56tn has been earmarked for the construction and provision of infrastructure. The ministry also has a total capital budget envelope spending of N3.24tn.

See also  NAF airstrikes kill terrorist commanders in Borno

Recall that the current administration has intensified efforts to complete 2,604 road projects inherited from previous governments.

Under road construction and reconstruction in the proposed 2026 budget, the government allocated N7.7bn for the reconstruction of the Abuja–Lokoja Road (Sections I and II: Zuba–Abaji), while N4.9bn was allocated for the completion of outstanding dualised sections of the same corridor, covering a remaining length of 86.6 kilometres.

Also on the Abuja–Lokoja axis, N4.2bn was proposed for the reconstruction of the Koton-Karfi–Abaji Road, Abuja-bound, in Kogi State.

Major funding was also proposed for the Kano–Maiduguri Road, with N13.3bn allocated for Section I (Kano–Wudil–Shuarin), N4.2bn for Section IV (Potiskum–Damaturu, including rehabilitation of failed portions), and N7bn for Section V (Damaturu–Maiduguri). In addition, N7.01bn was proposed for the reconstruction of Section III of the Mubi–Maiduguri Road, covering Madagali to Bama through Pulka and Gwoza.

The budget further earmarked N52.5bn for Phase II of the Kano–Katsina Road dualisation, stretching from KM 74+100 to KM 152+655, while N23.8bn was allocated for Phase I, running from Dawanau Roundabout in Kano to the Katsina State border.

Another N6.31bn was proposed for the dualisation and reconstruction of the Kano–Kwanar–Danja–Hadejia Road (Section II). On the Lokoja–Benin Road, the proposal includes N14m each for Phase I sections covering Obajana–Okene, Okene–Auchi, Auchi–Ehor, and Ehor–Benin City, while N14m was also allocated to rehabilitation works along the same corridor.

In the South-East and South-South, N11.9bn was proposed for the rehabilitation of Section III of the Enugu–Port Harcourt Road (Enugu–Lokpanta), while N7.7bn was allocated for Section IV (Aba–Port Harcourt).

See also  US defence department revokes journalists’ access over new media policy

An additional N6.3bn was earmarked for the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Section II of the Enugu–Port Harcourt dual carriageway, covering Umuahia Tower to Aba Township Rail/Road Bridge.

The budget also provides N14m for the reconstruction of Section II of the Benin–Sapele–Warri Road, N12.6bn for the reconstruction of the Ikorodu–Itoikin Road in Lagos, and N5.6bn for the rehabilitation of the Asaba–Agbor dual carriageway in Delta State. Emergency repair works on the Eko Bridge in Lagos were allocated N7bn, while N70m was set aside for the completion of Phase II of the Utor Bridge project in Delta State.

Rehabilitation works feature prominently across states, including N700m each for the Potiskum–Fika–Bajoga–Gombe Road, New Bussa–Kaima Road, Jega–Kwanar Sanagi–Kebbe–Gummi Road, Share–Pategi Road, Ibadan–Oyo Dual Carriageway, Ohan and Moro bridges on Ilorin–Igbeti Road, Kabba–Ayere–Isua–Ipele Road, Uturu–Isuikwuato–Akara Road, and multiple federal roads in Anambra, Jigawa, Ogun, Oyo, Ekiti, Yobe, and Cross River states.

Other notable allocations include N14bn for the construction and rehabilitation of the Wusasa–Jos–Turunku–Mararaban Jos Road in Kaduna, N4.21bn for the Agaie–Katcha–Barro Road in Niger State, N10.5bn for the rehabilitation of the Katsina Ala–Takum Road, and N7.7bn each for the construction of Oju–Adum–Okuku Road in Benue State and the reconstruction of the Ijebu-Igbo–Ita Egba–Owonowen Road linking Ogun and Oyo states.

Beyond individual contracts, the ministry proposed  N120bn as additional funding for ongoing projects in the South-South, N160bn for the South-West, N100bn each for the South-East, North-East, and North-Central, and N120bn for the North-West.

A further N600bn was earmarked for new road projects across the six geopolitical zones, while N100bn was set aside as a contingency fund.

See also  Why Nigerian Govt pardoned Ibom Air passenger – Falana

The proposal also reflects significant external financing commitments, with N367.9bn allocated for multilateral and bilateral tied loans for the Lafia Bypass and the dualisation of the 9th Mile–Otukpo–Makurdi Road, alongside N157bn in counterpart funding for the China Harbour Markurdi–9th Mile project.

Smaller allocations include N3.5m for Servicom and hypersensitivity programmes and N2.1m for coding and engraving of ministry equipment.

Altogether, the 2026 Works budget outlines one of the most expansive road investment programmes in recent years, spanning reconstruction, rehabilitation, dualisation, emergency repairs, and new projects nationwide, even as execution capacity and funding releases remain critical to delivery.

The proposed road spending represents one of the largest single-sector allocations in the capital budget, reflecting the government’s emphasis on road infrastructure as a driver of economic growth, trade facilitation, and national integration.

However, effective project execution, timely releases, and contractor performance will be crucial if the ambitious road budget is to translate into completed highways rather than an expanding stock of abandoned projects.

The 2026 budget proposal is expected to undergo legislative scrutiny in the coming weeks, with lawmakers likely to interrogate project prioritisation, regional balance, and the capacity of the ministry to deliver on its expanded road works programme.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Doctors under siege: NARD condemns attack on colleague in Owo, demands compensation

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  MAGA pastor claims God said the US should take the oil from Venezuela

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Anioma, Igbanke people in Delta back bill for creation of Anioma State

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  US - Iran truce: What we know

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Why Nigerian Govt pardoned Ibom Air passenger – Falana

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  MAGA pastor claims God said the US should take the oil from Venezuela

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending