Connect with us

Lifestyle

Crusade row rattles CAN, PFN

Published

on

Allegations of compromise and partiality have rocked the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria, the two major Christian bodies in Nigeria.

Reverend Yinka Yusuf, the lead pastor of a Lagos-based church, Household of Love Churches, alleged that he was forced to cancel a one-million-man crusade by the two associations despite investing millions of naira in transporting equipment to Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, the planned venue of the event.

While apologising to the 5,000 evangelists he claimed were heading to Nigeria from the United States of America, United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia, Namibia, he said the Christian bodies also compelled the Akwa Ibom State Government to withdraw approval for the use of a venue he already paid for.

But the Akwa Ibom State Government, in a rebuttal, accused Yusuf of hate speech, threatening to take legal action against him and demanding proof of the invitees.

The allegations are coming barely two months after the President of the Word Assembly Ministries, Rev. Isaac Omolehin, also accused PFN of hypocrisy and hostility.

The issues

The Christian Association of Nigeria is the umbrella body representing the interests of all denominations in Nigeria — Catholic, Protestant, Anglican and other blocs.

The Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria, on the other hand, is a specialised umbrella organisation representing Pentecostal and Charismatic churches across the country.

Yusuf, while announcing the cancellation of the ‘Uyo One Million Crusade’ in a Facebook post on Friday, said it was regrettable that the crusade, scheduled for February 9 to 15, would no longer hold.

He alleged that CAN and PFN insisted he reschedule the seven-day programme because of another event featuring a Kenyan prophet.

Yusuf said the Kenyan prophet crusade was not on the same days as his, questioning CAN and PFN’s insistence that his event be shifted.

According to him, the state government, in a letter by the agency that manages public facilities, withdrew an earlier approval of Ibom Hall for his crusade, citing “security concerns” and the “prevailing security situation in the state.”

The letter, dated January 27, was signed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Akwa Ibom Property and Investments Company Limited, Patrick Udomfang.

The cleric claimed he had paid the state government for the use of the hall, accusing the government of bowing to pressure from CAN and PFN.

“We have come to the end of the road for Uyo. The government, PFN, and CAN have insisted that I must reschedule our crusade to accommodate the Kenyan government, PFN, and CAN crusade by moving it forward by one week.

“We have decided to act according to the word of God and move to the next city. We have spent over N43m on this crusade project, moving our trucks and trailers to Uyo and conducting mass publicity with numerous billboards around the city.

“We apologise to the 5,000 evangelists we invited to Uyo from around the world; many have already purchased their tickets from America, the UK, South Africa, Australia, Namibia, among others. We are called to win souls and not to have conflicts with anyone. Therefore, we are withdrawing our trucks and trailers back to Lagos,” the cleric wrote.

Yusuf questioned why security concerns were raised against his programme when other large crusades, including one ongoing in Uyo by the General Superintendent of the Deeper Christian Life Ministry, Pastor William Kumuyi, were proceeding without issues.

See also  Flight fury: Inside story of KWAM 1, Emmason’s pardon

Describing the situation as unfair, he accused CAN and PFN leaders in Uyo of working against evangelistic ministries, insisting that his mission was not to establish a church in the state but to convert people for existing churches.

Yusuf also said while he respected CAN and PFN as Christian bodies, no organisation would stop him from preaching the gospel.

“I will do this till I die,” he declared.

Efforts to get the cleric to further substantiate his allegations were unsuccessful, as an official of the church told Saturday PUNCH that Yusuf would not speak further on the matter.

Controversial Kenyan prophet

While Yusuf’s Uyo crusade is scheduled for February 9 to 15, the Kenyan cleric, Prophet David Owuor, is having his from February 13 to 15.

The two crusades intercept for three days.

Also, though the two events are planned for different venues, Owuor is to use Ibom Hall on the last day of his programme.

Owuor, the founder of the Ministry of Repentance and Holiness in Kenya, has faced several high-profile allegations ranging from controversial healing claims to financial exploitation.

He is also known for contentious miracle claims, including assertions of healing HIV/AIDS, cancer and raising the dead.

The National Council of Churches of Kenya condemned claims of miracle healing attributed to Owuor, cautioning the public against accepting unverified assertions of supernatural cures.

He was also accused of coercing followers into surrendering wealth and property.

In 2019, the family of Jane Njagi, a lawyer and former follower, accused him of coercing her into relinquishing property worth millions of shillings.

The allegations prompted a police investigation into property fraud in the church.

In 2025, Owuor distanced himself from viral claims suggesting that he had prophesied the end of the world would occur on August 2, 2025.

The organisers of Owuor’s crusade, Nigeria Christian Revival Forum, declined comment when contacted by Saturday PUNCH.

CAN mum, PFN pledges probe

Efforts to reach the national leadership of CAN over the allegations were unsuccessful.

The National President of the body, Rev. Daniel Okoh, did not respond to calls or messages from our correspondent.

However, the National Director of National Issues and Social Welfare of CAN, Abimbola Ayuba, said he was not aware of the issues.

Further attempts to get clarification from him proved abortive, as he did not respond to subsequent questions.

When Saturday PUNCH contacted the Secretary of the Akwa Ibom State chapter of CAN, Rev. Isang Eyoumoh, he declined comment.

He said, “I’m not permitted to speak to the press on that issue. My chairman has not permitted me to speak on the matter.”

However, the national leadership of PFN said it would investigate the allegations.

Speaking to Saturday PUNCH, the National Secretary of PFN, Bishop David Bakare, said he was unaware of the planned crusade or any alleged attempt to stop it.

According to him, if there were any issues involving PFN, they were likely at the local level and had not been brought to the attention of the national leadership.

Bakare assured that the matter would be looked into now that it had been brought to the attention of the national leadership.

He insisted that PFN does not block crusades.

Bakare added that the group had collaborated with several clerics in the past, including Yusuf, and that such engagements had been successful.

See also  Danish aid worker shares new photo of two boys rescued 11 years ago in Akwa Ibom after being accused of being witches

“If he (Yusuf) has any challenges with PFN, he should approach us and let us resolve them. I think the issue now is at the local level of PFN; it has not been brought to my notice.

“But now that I am hearing from you, I will find out what is happening, and it will be resolved. It will be no problem. PFN does not stop people from doing crusades. PFN encourages crusades. Anything that has to do with winning souls, Pentecostals will always be at the forefront of it.

“We have collaborated with several people on such meetings before. Even with Rev. Yinka Yusuf, there was a lot of collaboration back in Kaduna that I am aware of. In conjunction with PFN, he held several meetings, and they were very successful,” Bakare said.

He suggested that the controversy might have arisen from a misunderstanding, misreporting, or actions by individuals at the grassroots.

PFN should be proscribed – Omolehin

Reacting, the President of the Word Assembly Ministries, Omolehin, accused CAN and PFN of undermining Christianity in the country.

The cleric, who spoke to Saturday PUNCH, lamented that while churches were facing external threats, internal actions by Christian organisations were further weakening the religion.

He said, “I have been a victim of that; PFN blocked and banned me from preaching in churches both within and outside Nigeria. Joshua Iginla in Abuja also suffered the same fate. Osayi Arome in Makurdi was also a victim. They forced him out of Nigeria; he is now based in Minnesota. I met him in Minnesota, where he told me that he had suffered more persecution than I had.

“This is an ongoing dilemma in the Nigerian church. I see this as a grand conspiracy beyond man. Satan is making efforts to run down the Nigerian church. The church is facing serious persecution across the country. Churches have stopped conducting night services across the Middle Belt, and more churches are being forced to shut down as a result of insecurity, yet both CAN and PFN are not doing anything about this. Rather, they are persecuting genuine men of God.

“While these external attacks on the church are going on, internal attacks are also being formulated as the final blow to kill the church and create hostility within. When you prevent evangelists and preachers from propagating the gospel, when there is a conspiracy within the body of Christ against the gospel, this is the final blow to kill the church in Nigeria.”

Omolehin described PFN as irresponsible, accusing it of presiding over moral decay among some pastors, which he said had damaged the credibility of Christianity.

Calling for the dissolution of PFN, the cleric said he would assemble a team of lawyers to review the fellowship’s founding documents and determine whether it had breached its obligations, with the intention of petitioning the Corporate Affairs Commission.

He, however, said CAN should remain, arguing that its leadership structure, largely made up of elderly clerics, was not responsible for the current problems within Christianity.

“PFN is an irresponsible organisation because under its watch, the church is dying. They took an oath to protect those under the institution. Hardly a week passes without Pentecostal leaders spewing what I would call disgrace into the Christian space. Many pastors under PFN are indulging in acts that no longer make Christianity attractive.

See also  Tinubu to review state police bill Sept 3

“All those institutions put in place to regulate our practice and protect practitioners are not living up to expectations. The church is now full of irresponsible leaders who cannot protect their members. Medical doctors, lawyers, and journalists have regulatory bodies saddled with the responsibility of punishing erring members. Christianity also has such bodies to regulate church activities, but they are moribund.

“I think PFN should be proscribed. I will soon assemble a group of lawyers to request PFN’s memorandum and articles of association to determine whether they are living up to their obligations, so that we can approach the Corporate Affairs Commission to proscribe them.

“PFN is no longer relevant, but CAN can remain in operation because the composition of CAN is largely elderly people. Those messing up Christianity in Nigeria are not the elderly but the younger ones in PFN,” the cleric said.

Akwa Ibom knocks cleric

But the Akwa Ibom State Government, on Friday, accused Yusuf of hate speech and disregard for due process.

The government, in a statement by the Commissioner for Information, Aniekan Umanah, dismissed the claim by the cleric that it disapproved the crusade over security concerns.

It said the action was informed by the “vile, inflammatory, and insulting remarks” allegedly made by Yusuf in a widely circulated video, in which he was accused of stereotyping and insulting the people of the state.

According to the statement, the comments were considered a direct affront to the collective identity, dignity, and intelligence of the state’s estimated 7.9 million citizens.

The government described Yusuf’s remarks as inciting and morally objectionable, adding that they were inconsistent with Christian values of love, humility, and respect.

“Hate speech is not evangelism, and insults are not a substitute for doctrine. We do not, and will never, expect any Akwa Ibomite to be a member of a church, ministry, or crusade built on contempt for their identity.

“Globally respected evangelists regularly hold crusades in Akwa Ibom State. At present, the General Suprintendent of the Deeper Life Christian Ministry, Pastor W. F. Kumuyi, is in the State for a crusade, further underscoring Akwa Ibom’s openness and religious tolerance.

“Notably, Pastor Kumuyi formally notified the state and paid a courtesy visit to the Governor, Pastor Umo Eno, at the Government House, Uyo. This is the expected standard of conduct, process, and respect from genuine men of God.

“By contrast, Pastor Yusuf showed blatant disregard for due process and established protocol. He failed to engage relevant government agencies responsible for security, crowd control, and emergency response; did not consult the Christian Association of Nigeria or the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria in Akwa Ibom State; and made unverifiable claims of having over 5,000 participants allegedly coming from across the world. The government hereby challenges Pastor Yusuf to publicly provide credible proof of these claims.

“Accordingly, the Akwa Ibom State Government states clearly, without any equivocation that we do not welcome Pastor Yinka Yusuf’s suspicious crusade in the state due to his denigrating actions, defamatory utterances, and open disrespect for the people, values, and lawful authority of the state.”

The government demanded an apology from the cleric, warning that failure to tender it might leave the government with no option but to seek legal redress.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Lifestyle

RESPECT IS RECIPROCAL: YOU CANNOT DEMAND WHAT YOU REFUSE TO GIVE

Published

on

Why do some people demand respect from everyone while treating others with disrespect?**

There is something deeply wrong with a society where people believe that respect should flow in only one direction.

Some people want to be respected because they are older, wealthier, more educated, more influential or occupy positions of authority. Yet they feel entitled to insult, intimidate, humiliate and belittle those they consider beneath them.

They want people to bow before them, but they refuse to treat others with dignity.

They want their opinions respected, but they dismiss the opinions of others.

They demand loyalty, but offer betrayal. They demand kindness, but practise cruelty. They expect understanding, but show little consideration for anyone else’s feelings.

**Is that respect, or simply an abuse of power?**

## Respect is not determined by wealth, age or status

Having money does not make you more human than someone who is struggling financially.

Being a boss does not give you the right to humiliate your employees.

Being a parent does not mean your children have no feelings or deserve no consideration.

Being older does not automatically make every decision you make right.

And holding a position of authority does not give you permission to treat people as though they have no value.

True respect is reflected in your character, behaviour and treatment of other people.

## Stop confusing fear with respect

This is where many people get it wrong.

Some people believe that because others remain silent around them, they are respected.

See also  I Have Never Been Asked For S€x For Roles – Nigerian Actress, Bisola Aiyeola Opens Up

But silence is not always respect.

Sometimes people are simply afraid of your anger, your influence, your financial power or the consequences of disagreeing with you.

You may command obedience through intimidation, but you cannot force genuine admiration.

**People may fear your power without respecting your character.**

## Respect begins with how you treat people

If you want people to respect you, start by examining how you treat them.

Respect the poor. Respect the vulnerable. Respect people who cannot offer you anything in return.

Respect those who disagree with you. Respect people’s boundaries. Respect their dignity, even when you have more money, authority or influence than they do.

You do not have to agree with everyone, but disagreement should never become an excuse for humiliation.

Respect does not mean tolerating abuse or surrendering your boundaries. It means recognising that every human being deserves basic dignity.

## The question we must all answer

Before demanding respect from others, take a moment to examine yourself.

Are you the kind of person who gives the respect you constantly demand?

Do you treat your domestic workers, employees, relatives, neighbours and strangers with the same dignity you expect from those around you?

Or do you believe respect is something other people owe you simply because of who you are?

**Remember: Respect is reciprocal. You cannot continuously disrespect people and expect genuine respect in return.**

### NEWSBREAK365 FINAL THOUGHT

The true measure of a person’s greatness is not how many people bow before them, but how many people they treat with dignity.

See also  Poco Lee’s management praises Zlatan’s support, urges restraint

**Never demand from others what you are unwilling to give.**

—

**JOIN THE CONVERSATION**

Do you believe respect should be given automatically, or should it be earned through character and behaviour?

Can someone genuinely demand respect while constantly disrespecting others?

Share your thoughts. Your opinion matters.

*Newsbreak365 — Informing, Challenging Perspectives and Inspiring Conversations.*

#RespectIsReciprocal #MutualRespect #HumanDignity #CharacterMatters #LifeLessons #SocialValues #Newsbreak365

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

YOUR WEALTH DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO OPPRESS THE POOR: STOP EXPLOITING THOSE WHO HAVE LESS THAN YOU

Published

on

Having money does not make you superior. Having power does not give you the right to intimidate others. And being in a position of authority does not make you the owner of another person’s dignity.

There is something deeply troubling about a society where some people believe that having money, connections, influence or authority gives them permission to treat less privileged people like they are worthless.

Some wealthy individuals look down on the poor. Some employers intimidate their workers because they know those workers depend on their salaries to survive. Some people in positions of authority exploit the vulnerability of those who cannot afford to challenge them.

Others use their financial advantage to humiliate, manipulate and silence people who have fewer opportunities.

But let us ask an important question: **When did having more become a licence to mistreat those who have less?**

## THE POOR ARE HUMAN BEINGS, NOT YOUR PUNCHING BAGS!

Being poor does not mean someone deserves humiliation.

A person struggling financially still deserves respect. Someone working for you is not your slave. A person who cannot afford to challenge your decisions is not someone you have the right to exploit.

Whether someone is a cleaner, security guard, domestic worker, factory employee, labourer, driver or street vendor, their dignity matters.

You may have the money, but they have feelings. You may have influence, but they have families to feed. You may have power, but they deserve justice.

Never confuse someone’s inability to fight back with permission to mistreat them.

See also  The Majekodunmi Family of Abeokuta: A Legacy of Heritage and Leadership

## WEALTH SHOULD BUILD PEOPLE, NOT DESTROY THEM

What is the purpose of becoming wealthy if your success comes at the expense of other people’s suffering?

Why intimidate an employee who is already struggling to survive? Why refuse to pay someone what they have legitimately earned? Why use your position to frustrate someone simply because you know they cannot afford to challenge you?

True success should create opportunities, encourage fairness and improve lives.

Pay people fairly. Respect their contributions. Treat workers with dignity. Help vulnerable people when you can.

You do not have to become poor to show compassion to the poor.

## REMEMBER: LIFE CAN CHANGE

The person you humiliate today may not remain in that position forever.

Financial circumstances can change. Positions can change. Businesses can collapse. Opportunities can disappear. The person who appears powerless today may become successful tomorrow.

Nobody knows everything tomorrow holds.

That is why humility matters.

Do not allow your present success to make you arrogant. Do not allow your wealth to destroy your humanity.

## THE MESSAGE IS SIMPLE

If you have more than others, remember that your advantage comes with an opportunity to make a positive difference.

Stop exploiting the poor. Stop intimidating vulnerable people. Stop using money and authority to silence those who have less.

**Be wealthy, but remain humane. Be powerful, but remain humble. Be successful, but never lose your conscience.**

Because at the end of the day, your bank balance may reveal how much money you have, but your treatment of other human beings reveals your character.

See also  Under pressure: Tinubu may drop controversial names from pardon list

**LET’S TALK:**

Why do some people become wealthy and powerful only to use their position to intimidate, exploit and oppress those who are less privileged?

Is it greed, arrogance, lack of compassion or a society that has normalised the abuse of power?

What is your opinion?

Share this article. Someone needs to hear this message.

#Newsbreak365 #HumanityFirst #RespectThePoor #StopOppression #StopExploitation #WealthAndCharacter #SocialJustice #Compassion

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Lifestyle

Mohbad Family demands identity of US lab for DNA test

Published

on

The family of late singer Ilerioluwa Aloba, popularly known as Mohbad, has demanded the disclosure of the identity of a United States laboratory expected to conduct a DNA test to determine the paternity of Liam, the singer’s son.

The family also called for the postponement of the examination scheduled for Saturday, October 31, at the Mainland General Hospital/IDH, Yaba, Lagos, pending clarification of its concerns over transparency and compliance with a court order.

In a statement signed by the family head, Samuel Aloba, and sent to PUNCH Metro on Thursday, the family said it was concerned about arrangements for the tissue-based DNA examination, particularly reports that samples would be collected in Lagos and sent to a laboratory in the US for analysis.

The family said it wanted clarification on whether the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre, which it claimed was designated by a court order issued on May 5, 2026, would conduct the examination or merely collect and dispatch the samples abroad.

“This raises a fundamental question that must be answered before the exercise proceeds: Is the Lagos State DNA and Forensic Centre itself going to conduct the examination contemplated by the court, or is it merely going to collect and dispatch samples to another laboratory?

“The distinction is material. Where a court has directed that a scientific examination be conducted at a particular institution, the parties are entitled to clarity regarding the manner in which that directive will be implemented.

“If the designated centre intends to rely on a foreign laboratory to conduct the analysis, the arrangement should be explained and, where necessary, presented to the court for clarification,” the statement read.

See also  Mallam Aminu Kano: The Voice of the People and Champion of Social Justice in Northern Nigeria

The family said no institution or party should unilaterally substitute a materially different arrangement for one contemplated by a subsisting court order without appropriate judicial clarification.

The family also demanded the full name and address of the proposed overseas laboratory, evidence of its accreditation and technical competence, details of the testing procedure, and documentation showing how the samples would be collected, labelled, preserved, transported and examined.

It further requested a mechanism to verify that the samples collected in Lagos were the same ones received and analysed by the foreign laboratory.

The statement added, “The family has been informed that the identity of the proposed overseas laboratory may be disclosed only to the court. While the family recognises the importance of protecting legitimate confidential information, confidentiality cannot be permitted to defeat the basic requirements of transparency, accountability and meaningful verification in a process whose outcome may have far-reaching legal and personal consequences.”

The family said its concerns were not an attempt to frustrate the judicial process or prevent a scientifically valid examination but to ensure that the outcome could withstand independent scrutiny.

It expressed apprehension about possible interference, mishandling or manipulation of the process if adequate safeguards were not established before the examination.

However, the family clarified that it was not claiming that the proposed test had already been compromised or that manipulation had been established.

“In a matter as sensitive as Mohbad’s DNA, the result must not merely be announced; it must be demonstrably reliable. The integrity of the process must be capable of independent verification, from the point of sample collection to the final laboratory report,” it said.

See also  Danish aid worker shares new photo of two boys rescued 11 years ago in Akwa Ibom after being accused of being witches

The family also linked its concerns to questions it had previously raised about the handling of biological samples during the post-mortem examination conducted in connection with Mohbad’s death.

It questioned the role of the pathologist involved in sample collection during the coroner’s inquest.

The family further claimed that information it received from its enquiries indicated that the laboratory to which samples from the earlier process were purportedly sent had not received them or any specimen registered in the name of Ilerioluwa Promise Aloba.

It stressed, however, that the assertions represented its account of the matter and required clarification and verification, adding that they were not findings of a court or independently established proof of wrongdoing by any individual or institution.

The family maintained that it supported a credible DNA examination capable of resolving Liam’s paternity but insisted that the identity of the testing laboratory and the chain of custody of the samples must be clear.

It called on the relevant authorities to address its concerns, provide the necessary information and ensure that the examination complied with the court’s order and accepted forensic procedures.

The family consequently requested the postponement of Saturday’s exercise until the outstanding issues were clarified, adequate notice was given to all parties and their legal representatives, and further directions were obtained from the court where necessary.

It said its objective was not to predetermine the outcome of the examination but to ensure that the eventual result was based on a credible and properly documented process.

The family added that the public interest in establishing the truth should not be undermined by avoidable uncertainty or a lack of transparency.

See also  I Have Never Been Asked For S€x For Roles – Nigerian Actress, Bisola Aiyeola Opens Up

Mohbad died at 27 on September 12, 2023. Following his death, the Lagos State Police Command inaugurated a 13-man special investigation team to probe the circumstances surrounding his passing.

Earlier reports in 2024 indicated that Aloba, through legal representatives, filed an application at the coroner’s court in Ikorodu to determine the cause of Mohbad’s death and later demanded a DNA test to resolve the paternity dispute.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending