Lifestyle

Crusade row rattles CAN, PFN

Published

6 months ago

January 31, 2026

Allegations of compromise and partiality have rocked the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) and the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria, the two major Christian bodies in Nigeria.

Reverend Yinka Yusuf, the lead pastor of a Lagos-based church, Household of Love Churches, alleged that he was forced to cancel a one-million-man crusade by the two associations despite investing millions of naira in transporting equipment to Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, the planned venue of the event.

While apologising to the 5,000 evangelists he claimed were heading to Nigeria from the United States of America, United Kingdom, South Africa, Australia, Namibia, he said the Christian bodies also compelled the Akwa Ibom State Government to withdraw approval for the use of a venue he already paid for.

But the Akwa Ibom State Government, in a rebuttal, accused Yusuf of hate speech, threatening to take legal action against him and demanding proof of the invitees.

The allegations are coming barely two months after the President of the Word Assembly Ministries, Rev. Isaac Omolehin, also accused PFN of hypocrisy and hostility.

The issues

The Christian Association of Nigeria is the umbrella body representing the interests of all denominations in Nigeria — Catholic, Protestant, Anglican and other blocs.

The Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria, on the other hand, is a specialised umbrella organisation representing Pentecostal and Charismatic churches across the country.

Yusuf, while announcing the cancellation of the ‘Uyo One Million Crusade’ in a Facebook post on Friday, said it was regrettable that the crusade, scheduled for February 9 to 15, would no longer hold.

He alleged that CAN and PFN insisted he reschedule the seven-day programme because of another event featuring a Kenyan prophet.

Yusuf said the Kenyan prophet crusade was not on the same days as his, questioning CAN and PFN’s insistence that his event be shifted.

According to him, the state government, in a letter by the agency that manages public facilities, withdrew an earlier approval of Ibom Hall for his crusade, citing “security concerns” and the “prevailing security situation in the state.”

The letter, dated January 27, was signed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Akwa Ibom Property and Investments Company Limited, Patrick Udomfang.

The cleric claimed he had paid the state government for the use of the hall, accusing the government of bowing to pressure from CAN and PFN.

“We have come to the end of the road for Uyo. The government, PFN, and CAN have insisted that I must reschedule our crusade to accommodate the Kenyan government, PFN, and CAN crusade by moving it forward by one week.

“We have decided to act according to the word of God and move to the next city. We have spent over N43m on this crusade project, moving our trucks and trailers to Uyo and conducting mass publicity with numerous billboards around the city.

“We apologise to the 5,000 evangelists we invited to Uyo from around the world; many have already purchased their tickets from America, the UK, South Africa, Australia, Namibia, among others. We are called to win souls and not to have conflicts with anyone. Therefore, we are withdrawing our trucks and trailers back to Lagos,” the cleric wrote.

Yusuf questioned why security concerns were raised against his programme when other large crusades, including one ongoing in Uyo by the General Superintendent of the Deeper Christian Life Ministry, Pastor William Kumuyi, were proceeding without issues.

Describing the situation as unfair, he accused CAN and PFN leaders in Uyo of working against evangelistic ministries, insisting that his mission was not to establish a church in the state but to convert people for existing churches.

Yusuf also said while he respected CAN and PFN as Christian bodies, no organisation would stop him from preaching the gospel.

“I will do this till I die,” he declared.

Efforts to get the cleric to further substantiate his allegations were unsuccessful, as an official of the church told Saturday PUNCH that Yusuf would not speak further on the matter.

Controversial Kenyan prophet

While Yusuf’s Uyo crusade is scheduled for February 9 to 15, the Kenyan cleric, Prophet David Owuor, is having his from February 13 to 15.

The two crusades intercept for three days.

Also, though the two events are planned for different venues, Owuor is to use Ibom Hall on the last day of his programme.

Owuor, the founder of the Ministry of Repentance and Holiness in Kenya, has faced several high-profile allegations ranging from controversial healing claims to financial exploitation.

He is also known for contentious miracle claims, including assertions of healing HIV/AIDS, cancer and raising the dead.

The National Council of Churches of Kenya condemned claims of miracle healing attributed to Owuor, cautioning the public against accepting unverified assertions of supernatural cures.

He was also accused of coercing followers into surrendering wealth and property.

In 2019, the family of Jane Njagi, a lawyer and former follower, accused him of coercing her into relinquishing property worth millions of shillings.

The allegations prompted a police investigation into property fraud in the church.

In 2025, Owuor distanced himself from viral claims suggesting that he had prophesied the end of the world would occur on August 2, 2025.

The organisers of Owuor’s crusade, Nigeria Christian Revival Forum, declined comment when contacted by Saturday PUNCH.

CAN mum, PFN pledges probe

Efforts to reach the national leadership of CAN over the allegations were unsuccessful.

The National President of the body, Rev. Daniel Okoh, did not respond to calls or messages from our correspondent.

However, the National Director of National Issues and Social Welfare of CAN, Abimbola Ayuba, said he was not aware of the issues.

Further attempts to get clarification from him proved abortive, as he did not respond to subsequent questions.

When Saturday PUNCH contacted the Secretary of the Akwa Ibom State chapter of CAN, Rev. Isang Eyoumoh, he declined comment.

He said, “I’m not permitted to speak to the press on that issue. My chairman has not permitted me to speak on the matter.”

However, the national leadership of PFN said it would investigate the allegations.

Speaking to Saturday PUNCH, the National Secretary of PFN, Bishop David Bakare, said he was unaware of the planned crusade or any alleged attempt to stop it.

According to him, if there were any issues involving PFN, they were likely at the local level and had not been brought to the attention of the national leadership.

Bakare assured that the matter would be looked into now that it had been brought to the attention of the national leadership.

He insisted that PFN does not block crusades.

Bakare added that the group had collaborated with several clerics in the past, including Yusuf, and that such engagements had been successful.

“If he (Yusuf) has any challenges with PFN, he should approach us and let us resolve them. I think the issue now is at the local level of PFN; it has not been brought to my notice.

“But now that I am hearing from you, I will find out what is happening, and it will be resolved. It will be no problem. PFN does not stop people from doing crusades. PFN encourages crusades. Anything that has to do with winning souls, Pentecostals will always be at the forefront of it.

“We have collaborated with several people on such meetings before. Even with Rev. Yinka Yusuf, there was a lot of collaboration back in Kaduna that I am aware of. In conjunction with PFN, he held several meetings, and they were very successful,” Bakare said.

He suggested that the controversy might have arisen from a misunderstanding, misreporting, or actions by individuals at the grassroots.

PFN should be proscribed – Omolehin

Reacting, the President of the Word Assembly Ministries, Omolehin, accused CAN and PFN of undermining Christianity in the country.

The cleric, who spoke to Saturday PUNCH, lamented that while churches were facing external threats, internal actions by Christian organisations were further weakening the religion.

He said, “I have been a victim of that; PFN blocked and banned me from preaching in churches both within and outside Nigeria. Joshua Iginla in Abuja also suffered the same fate. Osayi Arome in Makurdi was also a victim. They forced him out of Nigeria; he is now based in Minnesota. I met him in Minnesota, where he told me that he had suffered more persecution than I had.

“This is an ongoing dilemma in the Nigerian church. I see this as a grand conspiracy beyond man. Satan is making efforts to run down the Nigerian church. The church is facing serious persecution across the country. Churches have stopped conducting night services across the Middle Belt, and more churches are being forced to shut down as a result of insecurity, yet both CAN and PFN are not doing anything about this. Rather, they are persecuting genuine men of God.

“While these external attacks on the church are going on, internal attacks are also being formulated as the final blow to kill the church and create hostility within. When you prevent evangelists and preachers from propagating the gospel, when there is a conspiracy within the body of Christ against the gospel, this is the final blow to kill the church in Nigeria.”

Omolehin described PFN as irresponsible, accusing it of presiding over moral decay among some pastors, which he said had damaged the credibility of Christianity.

Calling for the dissolution of PFN, the cleric said he would assemble a team of lawyers to review the fellowship’s founding documents and determine whether it had breached its obligations, with the intention of petitioning the Corporate Affairs Commission.

He, however, said CAN should remain, arguing that its leadership structure, largely made up of elderly clerics, was not responsible for the current problems within Christianity.

“PFN is an irresponsible organisation because under its watch, the church is dying. They took an oath to protect those under the institution. Hardly a week passes without Pentecostal leaders spewing what I would call disgrace into the Christian space. Many pastors under PFN are indulging in acts that no longer make Christianity attractive.

“All those institutions put in place to regulate our practice and protect practitioners are not living up to expectations. The church is now full of irresponsible leaders who cannot protect their members. Medical doctors, lawyers, and journalists have regulatory bodies saddled with the responsibility of punishing erring members. Christianity also has such bodies to regulate church activities, but they are moribund.

“I think PFN should be proscribed. I will soon assemble a group of lawyers to request PFN’s memorandum and articles of association to determine whether they are living up to their obligations, so that we can approach the Corporate Affairs Commission to proscribe them.

“PFN is no longer relevant, but CAN can remain in operation because the composition of CAN is largely elderly people. Those messing up Christianity in Nigeria are not the elderly but the younger ones in PFN,” the cleric said.

Akwa Ibom knocks cleric

But the Akwa Ibom State Government, on Friday, accused Yusuf of hate speech and disregard for due process.

The government, in a statement by the Commissioner for Information, Aniekan Umanah, dismissed the claim by the cleric that it disapproved the crusade over security concerns.

It said the action was informed by the “vile, inflammatory, and insulting remarks” allegedly made by Yusuf in a widely circulated video, in which he was accused of stereotyping and insulting the people of the state.

According to the statement, the comments were considered a direct affront to the collective identity, dignity, and intelligence of the state’s estimated 7.9 million citizens.

The government described Yusuf’s remarks as inciting and morally objectionable, adding that they were inconsistent with Christian values of love, humility, and respect.

“Hate speech is not evangelism, and insults are not a substitute for doctrine. We do not, and will never, expect any Akwa Ibomite to be a member of a church, ministry, or crusade built on contempt for their identity.

“Globally respected evangelists regularly hold crusades in Akwa Ibom State. At present, the General Suprintendent of the Deeper Life Christian Ministry, Pastor W. F. Kumuyi, is in the State for a crusade, further underscoring Akwa Ibom’s openness and religious tolerance.

“Notably, Pastor Kumuyi formally notified the state and paid a courtesy visit to the Governor, Pastor Umo Eno, at the Government House, Uyo. This is the expected standard of conduct, process, and respect from genuine men of God.

“By contrast, Pastor Yusuf showed blatant disregard for due process and established protocol. He failed to engage relevant government agencies responsible for security, crowd control, and emergency response; did not consult the Christian Association of Nigeria or the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria in Akwa Ibom State; and made unverifiable claims of having over 5,000 participants allegedly coming from across the world. The government hereby challenges Pastor Yusuf to publicly provide credible proof of these claims.

“Accordingly, the Akwa Ibom State Government states clearly, without any equivocation that we do not welcome Pastor Yinka Yusuf’s suspicious crusade in the state due to his denigrating actions, defamatory utterances, and open disrespect for the people, values, and lawful authority of the state.”

The government demanded an apology from the cleric, warning that failure to tender it might leave the government with no option but to seek legal redress.

Post Views: 358

Lifestyle

Catholic bishops’ inconvenient truth

Published

2 hours ago

August 10, 2026

Newsbreak365_Admin

Politics and religion often conflate into a toxic brew. So, it is with the storm over John Onaiyekan’s comments after the recent meeting between President Bola Tinubu and the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria. As the waves billow and swell, the encounter opens a window into the tremors in government rather than the cardinal’s intentions.

Instead of treating the bishops’ observations as sincere moral feedback from a respected institution, some of the administration’s vocal defenders responded with personal attacks, accusing the cardinal of partisanship and abuse of clerical privilege.

That reaction was unfortunate and avoidable.

No elected government claiming democratic credentials should treat independent criticism as hostility.

Yet the ferocious responses from the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike; the President’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, Daniel Bwala; and the SSA on Media, Temitope Ajayi, suggested Onaiyekan had committed a grave offence by saying the bishops told the President Nigeria was “bleeding,” that poverty was worsening, and many were struggling under economic reforms.

The cardinal’s fault was not fabricating facts but speaking publicly about an uncomfortable conversation.

He said the President disagreed, insisting the economy was improving and reforms were laying the foundation for recovery.

The bishops, he said, neither expected agreement nor sought to embarrass the President; they were discharging a moral duty to tell him what many Nigerians could not.

That should have ended the matter. Instead, critics turned a healthy exchange into a public quarrel. Bwala questioned the cardinal’s neutrality, alleging the church supported Peter Obi in 2023.

Ajayi dismissed the bishops as offering only one perspective. Wike argued that having taken sides in a past election disqualified the cardinal from impartiality and faulted the bishops for questioning INEC’s neutrality ahead of 2027 without stronger proof.

These points merit consideration. Religious leaders, like journalists and civil society actors, should aim for fairness as credibility rests on intellectual honesty. Achievements by government should be acknowledged. But fairness works both ways.

The administration’s defenders owe Nigerians an honest engagement with the bishops’ substance rather than attempts to discredit the messengers.

Who the cardinal voted for is irrelevant to whether millions of Nigerians are suffering. Hunger and inflation do not check party membership before striking families.

One of the weakest responses to public criticism is to attack motives while avoiding the issues raised. That strategy failed to convince many Nigerians. Therefore, it is no surprise that support for Onaiyekan flowed from across civic space.

The Northern Youth Council said he reflected lived realities; the Middle Belt Forum called the attacks unfair; the Catholic Laity Council defended the church’s pastoral duty to speak for the vulnerable.

Former governor and minister Rotimi Amaechi, himself a Catholic, reminded the Presidency that bishops have every right to criticise governments and urged responses based on evidence, not indignation.

Even Orji Kalu, APC senator and former Abia State governor, threatened to resign from the party if the bishops were insulted, noting their similar interventions across Africa.

The public backlash appears to have prompted moderation. Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, reaffirmed the administration’s respect for the Catholic Church and promised deeper consultations.

That is the mature response expected of a confident government, and it should have been the first instinct.

The episode exposes a deeper problem.

With the 2027 elections on the horizon, there is a growing tendency in official circles to interpret every criticism through a partisan lens.

Independent institutions that refuse to sing from the government’s hymn book risk being branded hostile. Such defensiveness serves neither democracy nor good governance.

Onaiyekan’s sharper point was that too many people around the President paint an overly rosy picture of the country. Whether entirely fair, the observation highlights a real danger that administrations insulated by courtiers and loyalists risk mistaking praise for patriotism.

Presidents need more than briefings, official statistics and flattering presentations. They need uncomfortable truths from independent voices including economists, labour unions, journalists, business leaders, traditional rulers and religious organisations.

Governments that refuse to listen lose touch with the people they govern. That is why criticism is not the enemy of reform; silence is.

The Tinubu administration can rightly argue it inherited an economy in deep distress and that difficult choices were necessary. Removing the petrol subsidy and liberalising the foreign exchange market were politically costly but, many economists agree, economically inevitable.

The government has expanded fiscal space for states, created NELFUND, launched youth initiatives, and helped end the destructive cycle of prolonged ASUU strikes. These are notable achievements and deserve acknowledgement.

But governments are judged by citizens’ lived realities, not only by economic theory or improving macro indicators.

Foreign reserves have strengthened to $52 billion from about $3 billion, fiscal revenues rose to all-time highs, and the naira exchange rate has stabilised compared with the immediate post-reform shock.

Yet these gains have not delivered meaningful relief for the average Nigerian. Inflation remains punishing at over 15 per cent and above 37 per cent in at least 10 states; food and transport costs are soaring; healthcare and medication are costly; electricity tariffs and rent have escalated; small businesses struggle with high energy costs and expensive credit.

For too many families, over 70 per cent of income is spent on feeding alone. Multidimensional poverty affects 63 per cent of Nigerians, per the World Bank.

The bishops sought to communicate that reality. It cannot be dismissed by citing encouraging macro trends.

The reforms are also incomplete. A parallel foreign-exchange market persists, reflecting distortions and weak confidence.

Oil production remains below projections. Domestic refiners complain of inadequate crude supply even as the government extends Project Gazelle with a new $4.5 billion refinancing, raising concerns about future crude commitments while local refining capacity is planned to double.

External debt keeps rising, increasing exchange-rate exposure and debt-service obligations, which already consume half of revenues.

Terrorism, banditry and kidnapping continue to terrorise large swathes of the country, driving farmers from fertile lands and worsening food inflation.

Official and independent reports indicate that more than 628,000 people have been killed and over 2.2 million abducted since 2023, according to a BusinessDay report in June.

These are measurable national realities, not opposition talking points. Governments need independent voices to speak honestly about them. No pushback can erase the fact that Nigeria is bleeding.

The Catholic Church has a long history of such moral witness. During military rule, bishops such as Olubunmi Okogie, an Emeritus Cardinal, condemned authoritarianism, corruption and human-rights abuses.

Under democratic governments, the church continued to criticise administrations across the political spectrum over insecurity, governance failures and human suffering. Its loyalty has been to moral principles, not to any party.

Tinubu should not regard himself as uniquely persecuted, nor should his supporters mistake clerical witness for partisan politics.

Religious leaders are, firstly, citizens. They bury terrorism victims, counsel unemployed graduates, comfort widows and feed hungry families. If such leaders cannot speak about poverty, insecurity and governance, democracy becomes a farce.

Political parties are also inconsistent. Many who now defend petrol subsidy removal opposed it when it was proposed under President Goodluck Jonathan. Those who benefited from the freedom to criticise must not deny others the same liberty when roles reverse.

One of the most perilous governance tendencies is believing that criticism weakens government. On the contrary, governments make worse mistakes when they become prisoners of official optimism.

They need independent feedback to test whether policies yield intended outcomes. Economic models and official reports are necessary but insufficient; they must be complemented by honest input from labour, business, academia, the media, civil society and faith leaders. Without it, governments risk governing statistical abstractions rather than human realities.

It is encouraging that the administration now appears to be recalibrating. Akume’s pledge of deeper engagement deserves commendation.

Consultation, not confrontation, marks mature democratic leadership. The Presidency gains nothing by quarrelling with institutions focused on the country’s welfare.

Tinubu has often said he welcomes constructive criticism. He insisted that he sought the job and should not be pitied. This episode is a chance to prove it.

Labelling respected clerics as partisan for voicing uncomfortable truths suggests the administration may lack confidence in the transformative power of its own reforms. That is diminishing.

Nigeria’s problems are too serious for official defensiveness. Reform is a journey requiring constant feedback. The bishops fulfilled their civic and moral duty. The Presidency must perform its constitutional role by listening, not by silencing dissent.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 28

Lifestyle

LACK OF TRUST IN MARRIAGE

Published

17 hours ago

August 9, 2026

Oluwagbenga Olaoye

A marriage can survive difficult times, financial struggles, and disagreements—but when trust disappears, the relationship begins to lose its foundation.

When a husband no longer trusts his wife, or a wife no longer trusts her husband, even innocent actions can become suspicious. A simple phone call becomes a question. Coming home late becomes an accusation. A private conversation becomes a source of fear and jealousy.

Lack of trust creates emotional distance.

It produces constant suspicion, arguments, insecurity, resentment, and sometimes secretive behaviour. Instead of feeling safe with each other, couples begin to feel like enemies living under the same roof.

Trust is not built by controlling your spouse, checking their phone every minute, or constantly demanding explanations. Trust is built through honesty, faithfulness, transparency, consistency, and keeping your word.

If trust has been broken, don’t pretend everything is fine. Talk about it. Admit mistakes. Forgive where possible. Set healthy boundaries. And be willing to rebuild what has been damaged.

Remember: love may bring two people together, but trust helps keep them together.

💔 Don’t allow suspicion to destroy what communication and honesty can repair.

BUILD TRUST. BE FAITHFUL. BE HONEST. PROTECT YOUR MARRIAGE.

“Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour.”
— Ephesians 4:25 (KJV)

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 28

Lifestyle

LACK OF OPENNESS IN MARRIAGE

Published

17 hours ago

August 9, 2026

Oluwagbenga Olaoye

A marriage can look beautiful on the outside and still be struggling on the inside when there is no openness between husband and wife.

When couples stop communicating honestly, keep secrets, hide their feelings, or are afraid to discuss important issues, emotional distance begins to grow. What starts as “I don’t want to cause a problem” can eventually become mistrust, resentment, loneliness, and constant misunderstanding.

Openness does not mean telling your spouse everything in a hurtful or careless way. It means creating a safe relationship where both partners can honestly talk about their feelings, concerns, mistakes, finances, expectations, struggles, and dreams without fear of unnecessary humiliation or condemnation.

A strong marriage requires:

• Honest communication — Talk about problems instead of allowing them to grow in silence.
• Trust and transparency — Avoid unnecessary secrecy that can damage confidence in the relationship.
• Active listening — Listen to understand, not simply to respond or attack.
• Emotional vulnerability — Let your spouse know when you are hurting, worried, disappointed, or afraid.
• Respect — Honesty should never become an excuse for insults, threats, or emotional abuse.
• Forgiveness — When mistakes are acknowledged, work together toward healing and restoration.

The Bible says:

“Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.” — Proverbs 11:14 (KJV)

And:

“Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.” — James 1:19 (KJV)

Marriage should be a place where two people can feel safe enough to communicate, honest enough to admit their weaknesses, and humble enough to work through their differences.

Don’t allow silence, secrets, and suspicion to build walls between you and your spouse. Talk. Listen. Understand. Forgive. Grow together.

❤️ Openness builds trust. Trust strengthens intimacy. And healthy communication helps build a stronger marriage.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Post Views: 34