Connect with us

News

Confusion hits trial of suspected coup plotters

Published

on

There are indications that the Federal Government is undecided on the mode of trial for the officers alleged to have plotted a coup against President Bola Tinubu.

Saturday PUNCH gathered that the Federal Government has not given instruction on whether the suspects should be court-martialled or arraigned in a regular court.

According to credible sources, the confusion stems from concerns that the offence was committed under a democratic government, not in a military administration where erring officers could have been arraigned in military courts.

In October 2025, the military arrested 16 senior officers, including one Brigadier General, a Naval officer, and Air Force personnel, but the authority denied that it had something to do with the coup plot.

However, the Defence Headquarters, on January 26, admitted that the officers were indeed arrested for their involvement in a coup plot.

The DHQ Director of Defence Information, Maj. Gen. Samaila Uba, said the suspects would be arraigned before “relevant military judicial panels to face trial in line with the Armed Forces Act” and other applicable service regulations.

Apart from the military officers, about 24 other suspects were arrested in connection with the plan to topple Tinubu’s administration.

However, since the presentation of the report, the military has remained silent on the trial of the suspects.

Undecided judicial process

Saturday PUNCH learnt from top military officers that the silence was due to indecision on how to prosecute the suspects.

The officers, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorised to speak on the matter, confided in Saturday PUNCH that while the leadership preferred to court-martial the indicted officers, the Presidency was not convinced that a military court was appropriate for the arraignment.

See also  Atiku, economists raise concern over Tinubu’s $516m loan request

One of the officers at the Defence Headquarters, who is knowledgeable about the investigations said, “We (the military leadership) are waiting for the President’s directive on the constitution of the court-martial panel.

“The DHQ had earlier announced that the indicted officers would be court-martialled in line with our rules. But there are some people, including government officials at the federal level, arguing that a court martial is not appropriate.

“But I think there is a clarification here. Only the military officers will be court-martialled. We have our system. We have our ways of doing things. The civilians will be taken to a regular court; they are not part of us.”

Similarly, a top military officer at the Nigerian Army headquarters told one of our correspondents that investigations had been concluded and that the indicted officers would be arraigned ‘very soon.’

“They will be arraigned very soon. Investigations have been concluded; that was why the DHQ came out to present a report on the coup plot. Whoever is yet to be arrested cannot run forever,” he said.

Asked whether the suspects would be arraigned in a regular court or court-martialled, the officer said, “I don’t know. I am not in a position to determine which court to approach. However, this is not from us (military authority), and I am yet to confirm it. I think some people are pushing for the indicted officers to be arraigned in a civilian court. That is left for the President to decide. He is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.”

A senior official in the Federal Ministry of Justice also said the AG’s office had yet to decide the court in which the suspected coup plotters would be arraigned.

See also  I’m a peacemaker and not spokesman to armed groups – Sheik Gumi

He said there was “confusion” over the arraignment process, explaining that it required a careful approach.

“Nothing has been concluded. The AG’s office is central to the trial, whether it is a court-martial or a regular court.

“There is, indeed, confusion because this is the first time a coup attempt would be made under a civilian government. Previous coups occurred under military regimes, and they had their ways of handling such matters.

“We cannot rush to any court; we need to establish that the court has jurisdiction to handle the matter,” the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said.

Court-martial decision will be nullified – Falana

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer and Senior Advocate ofNigeria, Femi Falana, said any decision by a military panel would be nullified if the government proceeded with a court-martial for the suspected coup plotters.

Falana, who spoke with Saturday PUNCH, said a military panel had no jurisdiction to try the suspects, insisting that they could only be tried at a Federal High Court.

He said, “A court martial has no jurisdiction. If they go ahead with a court martial, the decision will be set aside. It happened in the Second Republic, when Mandara was taken to the Federal High Court, which had no jurisdiction at the time. He was freed by the Supreme Court. If you go to the wrong court, the case will be thrown out.

“We are in a civilian government; you can’t go to a court martial. They are not trying to overthrow a military dictator but a civilian President. Even throughout the military regime, no coup plotter was taken to a court martial because it is not covered by the Armed Forces Act. They were usually taken to special tribunals created by decrees for the trial of coup plotters. Those decrees have been repealed, and we are left with the Constitution.

See also  Trump says ‘not a big fan’ of Pope Leo after his anti-war message

“The Constitution states that treason and treasonable felony shall be tried in the Federal High Court. You can’t go to any other court. The Constitution is superior to the Armed Forces Act.”

Falana also faulted the continued detention of the suspects, arguing that they should have been arraigned in court.

He added that the military ought to have released other suspects since it had announced that 16 officers were already indicted in the attempted coup.

“They claim that 16 have been indicted. Why are they still detaining about 40 people? If you say you have indicted 16, then you must release the others who are still being detained.

“The military authorities are operating under a constitutional government, not under a military dictatorship. It is wrong to continue detaining the other suspects. Even for those who have been indicted, by now they should be made to face justice. You can’t keep them indefinitely since October last year.

“Under the Constitution, they cannot be detained for more than three months. They should have been arraigned, especially after the investigation report was released, instead of trying them in the media and leaking snippets of the report. That amounts to a media trial, which is not permitted under the Constitution.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Coup plotters reached out for spiritual cover — Cleric

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday watched a video recording in which an Islamic cleric, standing trial over the coup plot, told investigators that he warned the suspected conspirators that their plan would fail and that they would eventually be betrayed.

Justice Joyce Abdulmalik also ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine the voluntariness of statements and video recordings the prosecution sought to tender against the six defendants.

The ruling followed objections by defence lawyers, who argued that the statements were obtained in violation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and the Anti-Torture Act.

The Federal Government had on April 22 arraigned six defendants, including a retired major-general, over allegations of treason, terrorism, money laundering and conspiracy to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s government.

The defendants are Maj-Gen Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (retd.); Navy Capt Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (retd.); police inspector Ahmed Ibrahim; Presidential Villa electrician Zekeri Umoru; Bukar Kashim Goni; and a Zaria-based Islamic cleric, Sheikh Abdulkadir Sani.

They all pleaded not guilty to the 13 charges.

At Monday’s proceedings, prosecution counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), informed the court that the fourth prosecution witness remained in the witness box and applied for the playback of a video recording containing the alleged statement of the sixth defendant, Sani.

In the video played in open court, Sani said he knew the alleged ringleader, Col Maaji, for less than one year and was introduced to him through a man identified as Sanda.

The cleric said Sanda approached him for prayers concerning a planned coup and informed him that his “oga” needed spiritual guidance and divination over the success of the operation.

According to Sani, after conducting prayers, he informed them that the operation would fail.

“I warned them the coup would fail,” he said in the recording.

He added that he also told them that two persons involved in the alleged conspiracy would eventually betray the group.

Sani further stated that Sanda later returned with another request for prayers “so that the two individuals would not betray the group.”

The cleric said money was subsequently transferred to him for prayers and charity, while the names of persons allegedly involved in the plot were also sent to him for inclusion in the prayers.

According to him, shortly after the prayers commenced, Sanda informed him that Col Maaji had not been seen for four days.

He added that he later learnt through media reports that arrests had been made over an alleged coup plot.

See also  Strike: FG, ASUU in high-stakes talks

Sani, however, maintained in the video that the money transferred to him was not payment for supporting a coup.

“The money was meant for prayers,” he told investigators.

He also admitted that he understood a coup to mean a military overthrow of government, but claimed he did not report the alleged plot because he did not know who to report to.

The cleric narrated that he was later arrested after visiting the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission over restrictions placed on his bank account.

According to him, he discovered that the account had been flagged when he attempted to make withdrawals from the money sent to him.

He said that after contacting an EFCC deputy director, he was invited to the commission’s office, where he explained that the funds were meant for prayers.

Sani also stated in the recording that he did not make any statement relating to a coup while in EFCC custody.

Before the end of the video, the cleric confirmed that nobody assaulted or tortured him and that his “statements were made voluntarily.”

Following the playback, Oyedepo applied to tender extra-judicial statements allegedly made by the first to fifth defendants before a Special Investigation Panel and military police authorities, alongside Sani’s statement before military investigators.

The move was strongly opposed by lawyers representing all six defendants.

Muhammed Ndayako (SAN) appeared for the first defendant, while Paul Erokoro (SAN), A.H. Shehu, C.D. Okafor, M.A. Ibrahim, Olalekan Ojo (SAN), and Sanusi Musa (SAN) represented the other defendants.

The defence lawyers argued that the statements and accompanying video recordings were not voluntarily made and failed to comply with safeguards provided under the ACJA.

Some of the lawyers also relied on provisions of the Anti-Torture Act, 2017, alleging oppression, inducement and coercion during interrogation.

Counsel for the second defendant argued that his client was neither informed of his right to legal representation nor granted access to counsel before his statement was recorded.

The fourth defendant’s lawyer further argued that the video failed to establish whether his client’s legs were free during interrogation, insisting that coercion could not be ruled out.

Ojo, counsel for the fifth defendant, urged the court to order separate trial-within-trial proceedings for each defendant since all the accused persons were disputing the voluntariness of their statements.

Responding, Oyedepo said the prosecution was “not afraid of a trial within a trial.”

See also  I’m a peacemaker and not spokesman to armed groups – Sheik Gumi

He, however, urged the court to conduct a single joint proceeding instead of separate hearings for each defendant.

After listening to the arguments, Justice Abdulmalik ruled that the court would conduct “a joint trial within a trial to determine the voluntariness of the statements.”

The judge subsequently adjourned the matter till May 12 for continuation of proceedings.

The prosecution had alleged that the defendants planned to attack the Presidential Villa, detain Tinubu and other top government officials, and take control of strategic institutions.

Investigators also alleged that no fewer than 32 vehicles were procured for covert operations linked to the alleged plot.

Relatives protest

Meanwhile, relatives and sympathisers of military officers standing trial over the coup plot staged a peaceful protest at the Federal Ministry of Justice in Abuja on Monday, demanding an open trial and the release of the detained suspects.

The demonstrators, who converged on the ministry’s entrance, chanted solidarity songs and displayed placards bearing inscriptions such as “Tinubu Release Our Heroes,” “Lt Col C Chima 419 Witness,” and “AGF, Stop the Kangaroo Court Martial Now.”

Security personnel, including operatives of the Nigeria Police Force, however, prevented the protesters from gaining access to the ministry premises, restricting them to the entrance gate.

The protest comes amid growing criticism over the handling of the coup trial, particularly after journalists were barred last week from covering proceedings involving some of the accused officers.

Addressing journalists during the protest, the leader of the demonstrators, Justice Isimili, said many of those present were relatives of the detained officers who travelled from different parts of the country.

“Many of the people who turned out today are relatives of our heroes. Some of them came from Jos, Kano and Sokoto to protest the continued detention of the alleged coup suspects who are our fathers, uncles and brothers.

“All we are asking is for the President, who is our father, to temper justice with mercy. We want him to come to our aid. Many of us have not been able to rest or do anything because of our loved ones who are still being held.”

He condemned what he described as the secretive nature of the ongoing court-martial proceedings.

“We want an open trial instead of what they are doing in the name of court martial, where family members, journalists and the public are denied access to the court proceedings. All we are interested in is their freedom,” he added.

See also  Low turnout, tight security as Kwara church holds Sunday service

Another protester, Abdullahi Kale, who claimed he travelled from Sokoto for the demonstration, alleged that the continued detention of the suspects was creating the impression that northern military officers were being targeted.

“No freedom, no second term. If the President and the AGF fail to release them, we will mobilise the North against Tinubu’s re-election,” he threatened.

A female protester, Habibat Muhammad, who carried her one-year-old child, Abba, on her back, also appealed for leniency.

Speaking in Hausa, she lamented that life had become difficult for many of the affected families since the suspects were arrested about eight months ago from their homes and military formations.

Responding to the protesters, a director in the ministry, who declined to disclose her name, urged the demonstrators to remain calm and orderly.

According to her, the ministry had yet to receive any formal letter detailing their grievances and demands.

“This is what we told them. They should go back and put their house in order before coming back.

“When you return, let only two persons come with your letter. But if you insist on coming as a group like you did today, it will be misrepresented to mean another thing.”

When pressed to reveal her identity, the official declined.

“On this issue, I can’t give a name. I am just a director in the ministry. What I have only come to offer them is an explanation, which has been done. That is all,” she stated.

The latest protest adds to earlier demonstrations by families of the detained officers, who have repeatedly demanded either their release or immediate arraignment in a transparent and public court process.

The controversy surrounding the trial deepened two weeks ago when journalists were barred from covering bail proceedings involving six of the suspects at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Court officials, backed by operatives of the Department of State Services, reportedly ordered reporters out of the courtroom shortly before proceedings began.

The suspects are facing charges bordering on treason, terrorism, money laundering and failure to disclose information.

While some serving military officers are being tried before a court-martial in Abuja, others are facing trial in civilian courts.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

ISIS moves operations to West Africa, US warns

Published

on

The United States has identified Nigeria and the Lake Chad Basin as critical fronts in its 2026 counterterrorism strategy, warning that extremist groups operating across Africa remain a growing threat to global security.

In the strategy document, the US government said parts of Africa, including West Africa, the Sahel region, the Lake Chad Basin, Mozambique, Sudan and Somalia, have witnessed a resurgence of terrorist activities following the collapse of ISIS strongholds in Iraq and Syria.

The document noted that remnants of the Islamic State and affiliated jihadist groups had relocated to Africa and Central Asia, exploiting ungoverned spaces and weak security structures.

“President Trump unleashed the greatest fighting force the world has ever seen, and within a matter of weeks, a Jihadi insurgency which controlled vast territories across Iraq and Syria was gone.

“Subsequently, the surviving remnants of the world’s most dangerous terrorist group of the modern age were forced to relocate to Africa and Central Asia, in turn exploiting the ungoverned spaces there.

“As a result, today, there are parts of Africa where a resurgent terror threat is the reality. These include in West Africa, the Sahel region, the Lake Chad Basin, Mozambique, Sudan, and of course Somalia, where parts of ISIS have re-established themselves and Al Shabaab maintains its tribal-based Islamist insurgency,” it read.

The US said its major objective in Africa would be to prevent extremist groups from establishing operational bases capable of launching attacks against American interests.

“We will continue to work together with governments threatened by groups like ISIS and al Qaeda affiliates who threaten us as well, and assist them with actionable intelligence and CT partner-force development until our shared foes no longer pose a serious threat to either them or us,” it added.

See also  No going back on reforms, Tinubu tells World Bank team

The document also declared that the protection of Christians targeted by terrorist groups would remain a key priority of the administration.

According to the strategy, Washington would continue rebuilding bilateral counterterrorism relations with African governments while reducing direct military deployments on the continent.

“We will continue to work together with governments threatened by groups like ISIS and al Qaeda affiliates who threaten us as well, and assist them with actionable intelligence and CT partner-force development,” the document stated.

The strategy criticised previous US foreign policies under former President Joe Biden, claiming they weakened counterterrorism efforts and allowed extremist organisations to regroup across Africa.

Referencing Nigeria specifically, the document praised recent actions taken by President Donald Trump over attacks on Christians in the country.

“With the decisive action President Trump recently took in Nigeria, he made it clear that the slaughter of Christians will not go unchecked,” the document stated.

It quoted Trump as saying on Christmas Day in 2025, “I have previously warned these terrorists that if they did not stop the slaughtering of Christians, there would be hell to pay, and tonight, there was.”

The US also said it would maintain a “light military footprint” in Africa while expecting regional partners to shoulder more of the counterterrorism burden through intelligence sharing and coordinated operations.

According to the strategy, African nations possess “almost limitless potential” if governments are able to exercise effective territorial control and deny safe havens to terrorist organisations and violent extremist groups.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Ramaphosa slams xenophobic violence, vows illegal immigrants arrest

Published

on

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has condemned recent violent protests and attacks targeting foreign nationals in parts of the country, describing those behind the unrest as “opportunists” exploiting legitimate socio-economic grievances.

In a public address issued on Monday, Ramaphosa said the violent acts being recorded in some communities do not represent the South African government or the majority of citizens.

He stressed that individuals involved in stopping people, conducting searches, or checking identities without legal authority were engaging in unlawful conduct.

“These are the acts of opportunists who are exploiting the legitimate grievances, particularly those of the poor, under the false guise of ‘community activism.

“Some of these people are assuming functions that only state officials are permitted to perform. Such lawlessness will not be tolerated, regardless of who the perpetrators or victims are,” he said.

The president, however, maintained that South Africa must continue to address illegal immigration in a lawful and structured manner, warning that undocumented migration places pressure on public services and worsens unemployment.

“In a country with high unemployment, some employers are exploiting undocumented, cheaper foreign labour over hiring citizens and paying them legal wages.

“This is fuelling social tension and undermining labour protection laws,” he said.

Ramaphosa noted that the government was strengthening border security through the Border Management Authority and deploying the military to curb illegal crossings.

According to him, about 450,000 attempted illegal entries were intercepted in the past financial year.

He also confirmed ongoing immigration enforcement actions, including arrests and deportations of undocumented migrants, alongside reforms to the country’s migration system.

See also  No going back on reforms, Tinubu tells World Bank team

“We are stepping up workplace enforcement against employers who hire undocumented foreign nationals in violation of labour and immigration laws,” he said.

The president added that South Africa would also deploy up to 10,000 labour inspectors to improve compliance with employment and immigration regulations.

He urged both citizens and foreign nationals to comply with South African laws, warning that illegal activities involving fake documentation, bribery, or exploitation of public services would be prosecuted.

“Everyone in South Africa is bound by the same laws,” he said.

“We must make it clear that there is no place for xenophobia, ethnic mobilisation, intolerance or violence.”

Ramaphosa also defended South Africa’s refugee and migration framework, noting that the country continues to uphold human rights while managing immigration pressures.

He highlighted South Africa’s role in African integration, saying millions of visitors from across the continent enter the country annually for tourism, education, and trade.

“South Africa continues to play its part in deepening African integration and solidarity,” he said.

He called for cooperation between countries to address migration challenges and urged restraint amid rising tensions.

The remarks come amid renewed anti-foreigner protests and reported incidents of looting and violence in parts of Durban, Cape Town, East London, and KwaZulu-Natal.

Recall that the Nigerians in Diaspora Commission has advised Nigerians in South Africa to avoid confrontations, stay alert, and monitor official updates as authorities continue to manage the situation.

The commission further urged Nigerian business owners to take precautionary measures.

NiDCOM noted that the Nigerian Consulate in Johannesburg remains operational and is working with South African authorities to ensure the safety of citizens.

See also  Rivers assembly resumes sitting after six-month suspension

The commission also disclosed that the Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, is engaging with her South African counterpart over the situation.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending