Connect with us

Politics

Inside Kwara APC’s consensus dilemma

Published

on

Unlike Lagos, Ogun and Oyo where quiet moves toward consensus candidates are emerging, deep-rooted rivalries, competing power blocs and zoning disputes threaten to derail any similar arrangement in Kwara State, DARE AKOGUN and TOYEEB OMOTAYO write

As Nigeria’s ruling party quietly experiments with consensus candidacy in parts of the South-West, the situation in Kwara State presents a sharp contrast one defined by intense internal rivalry, overlapping interests and a political culture resistant to easy compromise.

The PUNCH reported on Tuesday that the All Progressives Congress was exploring consensus arrangements in Lagos, Ogun and Oyo states in n the western part of the country, with names such as Obafemi Hamzat, Olamilekan Adeola (Yayi), and Sharafadeen Alli said to be favoured after high-level consultations involving President Bola Ahmed Tinubu and party stakeholders.

The consensus model, long preferred within the APC for its ability to minimise internal conflict and project unity, has been credited with stabilising party structures in several states.

However, attempts to replicate such arrangement in Kwara are already running into turbulence.

Investigations by The PUNCH reveal that unlike the relatively coordinated South-West political machinery, Kwara APC is grappling with deep-seated factional interests, personal ambitions and ideological divides that may make consensus not only difficult but potentially destabilising.

Illusion of consensus

At first glance, the idea of a consensus candidate appears attractive.

It reduces the cost of primaries, prevents post-primary litigation and allows the party to rally early behind a single flagbearer.

It also aligns with the Electoral Act provisions that permit political parties to adopt consensus arrangements.

But in Kwara, insiders say the situation is far more complicated.

A chieftain of the APC in the state Alhaji Babatunde Waheed said it will be difficult for anyone to impose a consesus candidate on the party without protest.

“There is no single power centre that can impose consensus without resistance.

“Every major aspirant has a structure, and more importantly, has backers who are unwilling to step down,” he said.

This is where Kwara diverges sharply from Lagos or Ogun, where political hierarchies are more clearly defined and largely aligned with presidential influence.

In Kwara APC, at least four distinct power blocs are already jostling for control of the party’s 2027 governorship ticket.

At the centre is Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq, whose incumbency gives him significant leverage in shaping succession dynamics.

Then comes the silence influence of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, whose names many aspirants have thrown around and political calculations in the North-Central may not necessarily align with local preferences.

See also  Wike PDP faction installs PDP excos in Bayelsa, Ekiti, Oyo

A third bloc comprises established politicians and aspirants figures like Saliu Mustapha, Yahaya Seriki who both contested with the current governor in 2019 who actively has a long standing   grassroots and elite alliances.

The fourth bloc includes legacy political structures like former APC chairman in the state Hon. Bashir Bolarinwa and opposition forces linked to Bukola Saraki, whose shadow continues to loom over the state’s political landscape.

The coexistence of these competing centres of influence has created a volatile environment where consensus is easier proposed than achieved.

Governor vs Aspirants

At the heart of the unfolding drama is the question of who controls the APC structure in Kwara.

While Governor AbdulRazaq is expected to play a major role in determining his successor, several aspirants are already positioning themselves as independent power centres.

Speculation about the governor’s alleged preference for the Speaker of the State House of Assembly, Salihu Danladi, has further complicated matters.

Although the  Governor, has dismissed speculations that he has endorsed or promised to anoint a successor ahead of the 2027 governorship race, insisting that the All Progressives Congress will conduct an open and merit-based primary.

The governor spoke in Ilorin at the State Congress of the APCbhekd in March, amid growing political rumours that he had concluded plans to back a candidate from Kwara North Senatorial District to succeed him.

“For those who will contest and whoever eventually emerges, it is not about anyone anointing anybody.

“We are not here to build a dynasty; we are here to build a legacy. Whoever succeeds me will build on this foundation and strive to do better,” he said

For supporters of other aspirants, such a reassurance does not hold water as it is believed that there is as an attempt to impose a candidate an idea that clashes with the post-2019 political consciousness in Kwara.

A senior party stakeholder who doesn’t want one named said the ‘Otógé’ movement was about ending imposition.

“If the party goes back to that, it could create serious internal crisis,” he said.

This tension reflects a broader dilemma: how to balance incumbency influence with internal democracy.

Battle lines drawn

Unlike in Lagos where consensus discussions reportedly followed consultations among stakeholders, Kwara’s aspirants are already locked in subtle but intense competition.

See also  Soludo’s Anambra win sparks political storm

Supporters of leading contenders have taken positions, often engaging in behind-the-scenes lobbying, media campaigns and grassroots mobilisation.

Senator Saliu Mustapha’s recent outreach efforts including donations beyond his senatorial district are widely interpreted as strategic moves to consolidate support.

Similarly, Yahaya Seriki’s philanthropic engagements and donations during the just concluded Ramadan have strengthened his political visibility and grassroots appeal.

Senator Sadiq Umar also recently  organized a football competition on Kwara central recently which is seen as many as trying to make in roads into the central senatorial districts.

Other aspirants, including party loyalists and technocrats, are also building alliances quietly.

A political observer Ranti Adesola said the result is a crowded field where each camp believes it has a legitimate claim to the ticket.

“In this kind of environment, asking people to step down for consensus is not realistic, as everyone believes he stands the better chance of emerging the candidate.

“We are back to the same scenario in 2019 where all the gladiators didn’t stepped down for each other and also went to claim victory after the primaries, which the result was not announced until three days in Abuja, “ she said.

Zoning

If internal rivalry is one challenge, zoning is another major obstacle to consensus.

Kwara North’s long-standing demand for the governorship has gained renewed momentum ahead of 2027.

Leaders from the region argue that since the brief tenure of Shaaba Lafiagi in the early 1990s, Kwara North has been largely excluded from power.

For them, zoning is not just a political strategy it is a matter of equity and justice.

However, this position is strongly contested by stakeholders from Kwara Central, the state’s political and demographic stronghold.

Given that Kwara Central and Kwara South accounts for a significant share of the state’s voting strength, many argue that zoning the ticket away from the region could weaken the APC’s electoral chances.

This argument has been echoed by figures like Professor Abubakar Suleiman, who warned against repeating what he described as the PDP’s miscalculation in 2023.

The clash between zoning advocates and merit proponents has created a deep fault line within the party one that consensus alone may not easily resolve.

Tinubu factor

While President Tinubu’s influence is expected to be significant, analysts say it may not be absolute in Kwara.

A political analyst, Segun Adeola, said in the South-West, Tinubu’s political authority is largely uncontested, making it easier to broker consensus among stakeholders.

See also  2026: I’m cruising to victory, Adeleke boasts

“In Kwara, although he is the President and leader of the party in the country, nevertheless his influence and foot soldiers must contend with local dynamics, entrenched interests and competing loyalties.

“Tinubu can guide, but he cannot outrightly dictate in Kwara the way he might in Lagos.

“Moreover, recent developments suggest that even in the South-West, the consensus narrative is not without controversy,” he said.

Lessons from the West

The emerging consensus model in Lagos, Ogun and Oyo offers important lessons but also highlights the uniqueness of Kwara.

In those states, the process whether fully agreed or still evolving has been driven by structured consultations, strong party leadership and a shared interest in maintaining unity.

In Kwara, however, the absence of a single dominant structure means that consensus, if pursued, would require extensive negotiations, concessions and possibly compensations.

As one party insider put it: “Consensus is easy when everyone agrees. In Kwara, the challenge is that everyone believes they should be the consensus”.

On one hand, consensus offers a pathway to unity and early mobilisation.

On the other, the realities of internal competition, zoning disputes and multiple power centres make such an arrangement difficult to implement.

For now, consultations are ongoing, alliances are shifting and ambitions remain firmly intact.

Even then, there is no guarantee of success.

The biggest risk facing the APC in Kwara is not just the difficulty of achieving consensus but the possibility that attempts to enforce it could deepen internal divisions.

In several states, contentious primaries and imposition of candidates have led to defections, parallel structures and electoral losses.

With the opposition Peoples Democratic Party still a formidable force under Saraki’s influence, any internal crisis within the APC could prove costly.

What is clear, however, is that unlike Lagos, Ogun and Oyo, where consensus may be gradually taking shape, Kwara’s path to a candidate is likely to be far more turbulent.

In the end, the question is not whether the APC will attempt a consensus in Kwara but whether the state’s complex political ecosystem will allow it.

That reality may ultimately define not just the APC’s internal dynamics, but the outcome of the 2027 governorship election itself.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Jonathan will be on 2027 ballot, says coalition convener; read details

Published

on

Former President Goodluck Jonathan will appear on the 2027 presidential ballot, a coalition pushing for his return to power has declared. However, Jonathan himself is yet to formally accept the proposal.

The Convener of the Coalition for Jonathan and a member of the African Democratic Congress, Dr Tom Ohikere, made the disclosure in an interview with ARISE TV, saying the former president would make his position known within one to two days.

He was responding to questions about Jonathan’s comment that seeking the presidency was “not a computer game,” which Ohikere said had been misread by some observers.

“Let me make sure that it must not be misunderstood by Nigerians. When he said it’s not a computer game, what he was trying to say was that it’s not an easy thing for somebody to just come up and say he wants to contest presidency. A lot is involved. It’s a huge process, a very comprehensive process.

But all I want to say is that Goodluck Jonathan will be on the ballot,” he said.

When pressed on whether Jonathan had accepted the coalition’s proposal, Ohikere acknowledged he had not.

“He never accepted. But in the fullness of time, shortly, shortly, give him the next one or two days, he will make his pronouncement,” he said.

The coalition has been actively pressing Jonathan to contest the 2027 presidential election, framing his potential candidacy as a vehicle for national healing and unity.

During recent visits, Jonathan reportedly indicated he would consult widely before arriving at a decision.

See also  Anambra Election: Peter Obi Votes, Laments Vote Buying (Photos)

The ADC has positioned itself as the platform for Jonathan’s potential run, as opposition forces continue to regroup ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Jonathan’s eligibility to contest, however, remains the subject of legal dispute.

A Federal High Court suit is challenging whether his return to the ballot would violate term limit provisions of the 1999 Constitution, given that he served as president from 2010 to 2015.

Jonathan lost the 2015 presidential election to President Muhammadu Buhari and conceded defeat before results were fully announced.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Court adjourns ADC leadership suit indefinitely

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday again adjourned indefinitely the suit filed by an African Democratic Congress (ADC) chieftain, Nafiu Bala Gombe, challenging the party’s leadership under former Senate President David Mark.

Justice Emeka Nwite adjourned the matter sine die after the plaintiff informed the court that he had applied to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for the transfer of the case to another judge.

The suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025 has generated a fresh leadership crisis within the ADC following the emergence of Mark and former Osun State governor, Rauf Aregbesola, in the party’s leadership structure.

At the resumed proceedings, counsel for the plaintiff, Luka Musa Haruna, told the court that the Supreme Court had on April 30 dismissed the interlocutory appeal earlier filed by Mark against the proceedings.

He said the apex court also set aside the Court of Appeal’s order staying proceedings in the substantive suit.

“The interlocutory appeal of the second defendant has travelled to the Supreme Court. My Lord, we are glad to inform this honourable court that on the 30th day of April 2026, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the interlocutory appeal dismissing the said appeal for lacking in merit,” he said.

The lawyer, however, disclosed that the plaintiff had written a letter dated May 4, 2026 to the Chief Judge seeking reassignment of the case to another judge.

Haruna urged Justice Nwite to await the administrative decision of the Chief Judge on the request.

See also  Ex- Oyo LG chairman joins Reps race, donates new APC secretariat

“At this juncture, we must humbly pray to your Lordship, to wait for the administrative decision of the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Haruna said.

The request was opposed by lawyers representing the defendants, who accused the plaintiff of attempting to frustrate the accelerated hearing earlier ordered by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court.

Counsel for the first defendant, Realwan Okpanachi, faulted the plaintiff for allegedly ambushing the defence with the transfer request.

“We have not received any communication regarding that application. My Lord, so as it is, we don’t know the form or the content of that application. Therefore, we take the approach of the plaintiff as an ambush,” he said.

“We also consider it as an attempt to frustrate the order of accelerated hearing granted by the Court of Appeal and upheld by the Supreme Court,” he added.

Counsel for the second defendant, Sulaiman Usman, described the move as “forum shopping and judge shopping.”

“So my Lord, for the plaintiffs to come back to this court, and to inform us today that they have written a private correspondence to the Honourable Chief Judge, and to hinge that to make a request for this court to await the outcome of that private correspondence, is not only unfortunate My Lord, but a dangerous trend which must not be allowed to stand,” he said.

Counsel for the fifth defendant, P.I. Oyewole, also opposed the request, describing it as “strange” and accusing the plaintiff of inviting the Chief Judge “to indulge in judicial rascality.”

See also  APC reforms, Tinubu’s performance attracting opposition members – Party chieftain

Responding, Haruna maintained that the plaintiff stood by the application.

Ruling, Justice Nwite held that the court could not take any action on the letter without hearing all parties.

“Taking a decision or any action in such a letter without hearing from the defendants will amount to breach of their fundamental right in this suit,” the judge ruled.

He added that since the letter was addressed to the Chief Judge, the trial court could not make any pronouncement on it.

Justice Nwite subsequently adjourned the matter indefinitely.

“This matter is best adjourned sine die to afford the parties properly file a Certified True Copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the interlocutory appeal in the suit, to serve the defendants with the letter addressed to the Honourable Chief Judge, and finally to await further or any directive from the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court,” Justice Nwite said.

Gombe is seeking an order restraining Mark, Aregbesola and others from parading themselves as leaders of the ADC, arguing that their emergence violated the party’s constitution and provisions of the Electoral Act.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Why Jonathan Can Not Win 2027 Election’

Published

on

Some political analysts have predicted that former President Goodluck Jonathan has no chance of winning the 2027 presidential election should he decide to contest.

Speaking during an interview with Daily Trust, political analysts, Jide Ojo and Prof. Saleh Dauda both ruled out the chances of Jonathan clinching victory at the 2027 polls.

It was reports that their position was made known following the latest calls by some youths for Jonathan to contest the 2027 presidency.

In his view, Jide Ojo argued that those calling for Jonathan’s return were merely trying to weaken the South politically ahead of the election.

He observed that Jonathan had largely stayed away from partisan politics since leaving office in 2015 and had instead focused on peace-building activities across Africa, and urged him to remain so.

“This man has decided to mind his own business, certifying peace efforts, observing elections across Africa and running his foundation. So why drag him into partisan politics now?” he asked.

According to him, Jonathan’s chances of winning the presidency are “next to nothing,” adding that the former President has no political support base, and it may be too late to align with any political party.

“He has not been politically active since 2016. He has not built any political support base or movement. So, the bottom line is that he will not win.

“They don’t want him to win. What they simply want is to polarise and fragment the southern vote,” Ojo said.

On the issue of political platform, Ojo questioned which party Jonathan would contest under, noting that party primaries are already close.

See also  2027: Atiku delays ADC membership card collection amid rumoured Jonathan comeback

“Today is May 6 and party primaries are expected soon. Under which platform does he want to contest?” he queried.

Also speaking, Prof. Dauda advised Jonathan to ignore the calls and stay away from active politics. According to him, the current realities of Nigerian politics do not favour Jonathan.

“Let me be frank with you. If there is any advice I can give Jonathan, it is to stay away from this frivolous move.

“His chances of winning an election, as far as I understand, is zero,” he stated.

When asked again if Jonathan’s chances were truly nonexistent, the professor replied: “Yes, given the nature of Nigerian politics.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending