Connect with us

News

Kwara drags Bukola Saraki to court over alleged defamation

Published

on

The Kwara State Government has filed a criminal defamation suit against former Senate President, Bukola Saraki, accusing him of making false claims about the educational background of Governor AbdulRahman AbdulRazaq.

The case, instituted before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin, was filed by the state Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Senior Ibrahim, alongside the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ayoola Akande, and Assistant Chief State Counsel, B.L. Abdulsalam.

The matter came up on Wednesday before Justice M.O. Folorunso.

According to court documents, the government alleged that Saraki, on April 17, 2026, published and circulated statements through social media and newspaper platforms claiming that AbdulRazaq did not attain secondary school education.

The prosecution argued that the publication was false, malicious and intended to bring the governor and the state government into disrepute.

It further alleged that the statements contained insulting and abusive expressions capable of provoking public unrest and disturbing public peace, contrary to Section 399 of the Penal Code, Cap. P4, Laws of Kwara State, 2006.

At the proceedings, prosecuting counsel, R.O. Balogun, urged the court to issue a bench warrant against Saraki, arguing that the former Senate president failed to appear despite being served with the court processes.

“The defendant was duly served but failed to appear before the court. We, therefore, urge Your Lordship to issue a bench warrant to compel his attendance,” Balogun submitted.

He also opposed an application for adjournment filed by the defence, maintaining that the prosecution was ready to proceed with the case.

However, Saraki’s lawyer, Jimoh Mumini (SAN), challenged both the jurisdiction of the court and the validity of the service of the processes on his client.

See also  US steps up military training for Nigerian troops, read details

“This matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Federal High Court. In addition, the defendant was not properly served with the processes relied upon by the prosecution,” Mumini argued.

After hearing submissions from both sides and standing down the matter for about two hours, Justice Folorunso ruled that the defendant was entitled to seek an adjournment and fixed July 3, 2026, for the hearing of the preliminary objection and possible arraignment.

The PUNCH reports that the latest suit deepens the legal confrontation between the AbdulRazaq administration and Saraki.

Earlier on April 9, the state government filed a separate 20-count charge against Saraki, former Kwara State Governor Abdulfatah Ahmed, and two former aides over allegations relating to the arming of suspects convicted in connection with the 2018 Offa robbery attacks.

The other defendants in that case are Yusuf Abdulwahab, a former Chief of Staff to Ahmed, and Alabi Olalekan.

Responding to the earlier charges, Saraki denied any link to armed robbery or other criminal activities and insisted that previous investigations had cleared him of wrongdoing.

“I have nothing to do directly or indirectly with any case of armed robbery or any criminal matter,” Saraki said in a statement he personally signed.

The former Senate President maintained that he had been exonerated by both the police and the Director of Public Prosecutions in the Office of the Attorney General of the Federation, describing the prosecution as politically motivated.

In a statement issued on Wednesday by his media office, Saraki said his lawyers, led by  Mumini (SAN), appeared before the Kwara State High Court in Ilorin to challenge the suit filed over a social media post he made on April 17, 2026, in response to an earlier statement by the state government.

See also  Fake PFIPC agency scandal: Tinubu orders 30-day ICPC probe, Senate rejects blame

The case arose from allegations that Saraki’s comments on Facebook and X questioned the educational qualifications of Governor AbdulRazaq and amounted to criminal defamation and cyberbullying.

According to the statement issued by the Press Officer on Local Matters, Abubakar Bukola Saraki Media Office, Abdulkadir Abdulganiy, Saraki’s legal team, led by Mumini, maintained that the social media posts in question constituted a legitimate exercise of freedom of expression and a right of reply.

“Dr Saraki’s post on Facebook and X being complained of were mere exercises of his freedom of speech and right of reply, as the leader of the opposition to Governor Abdulrazaq’s political party,” the statement said.

It wondered why Saraki’s social media post could constitute criminal defamation and cyberbullying against the governor.

The statement noted, “We note that it is a recurring decimal for the Kwara governor to seek to use the courts to harass and intimidate the leaders of opposition in the state any time they make any comment against the policies and actions of his administration.

“We believe that, like his earlier efforts to abuse the judicial process to silence the opposition, this case will fall like a pack of badly arranged cards.

“We note that the Kwara State government believes the alleged defamatory social media post deserves more attention than the issue of acute insecurity plaguing the state, in which two of the three senatorial districts in the state have become a den of kidnappers, bandits, and insurgents.

“Also, the case of 176 people kidnapped from the Woro community in the northern part of the state who have been in captivity since early February is taking a back seat behind the issue of a social media post, which the governor’s handlers believed was unpleasant to him.

See also  PHOTOS: We’re repositioning Ogun as Nigeria’s leading destination for culture, tourism – Gov Abiodun

“Today, we noticed that the governor and his handlers mobilised the media and their supporters to the court premises. We believe the energy and resources deployed to achieve that could have been better utilised as part of the resources to secure the release of the captives in the kidnappers’ den across the state.

“We have mentioned these more sensitive alternatives that require the attention of Governor AbdulRazaq and his government instead of dissipating resources on the impact of words that he exchanged with the opposition leader in the state to demonstrate that the court case is just another diversionary tactic.”

It added, “Dr Saraki continues to retain his confidence in the Nigerian judiciary and its ability to do justice to all parties, in all cases and situations.

“That is why his lawyers will also continue to defend his position and strongly put forward his case before the court on all matters, including this case arising from a social media post.”

The former Senate President appealed to his supporters across the state and beyond to remain calm and law-abiding.

He assured them that all the oppressive tactics aimed at intimidating and silencing him would come to nought.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Gbajabiamila reveals 24 state assemblies approve state police amendment

Published

on

The proposed constitutional amendment to establish a dual policing system in Nigeria has secured approval from 24 State Houses of Assembly, meeting the two-thirds threshold required for constitutional alteration.

The Chief of Staff to the President and Chairman of the Presidential Working Group on the National Policing Bill, Femi Gbajabiamila, disclosed this in a statement on Friday, October 23, 2026.

The statement said the approval of 24 of the 36 state assemblies met the constitutional requirement for the Constitution (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, which provides for a dual policing system.

The Working Group commended the state assemblies for their action and the National Assembly for passing the amendment in both chambers.

“In line with Section 9 of the Constitution, the amendment can now be returned to the National Assembly for transmission to Mr President for assent,” the statement read.

The proposed amendment is expected to provide constitutional backing for the policing framework contained in the draft National Policing Bill, 2026, prepared by the Presidential Working Group.

October 30 timeline

The group said the draft bills were undergoing legislative drafting review and validation at the Federal Ministry of Justice and were expected to be returned on or before Friday, October 30, 2026.

It added that the group would give the bills final consideration before presenting them to President Bola Tinubu.

The Working Group urged stakeholders to support what it described as a smooth transition to a dual policing system aimed at making Nigerians safer.

PUNCH had reported in September that the National Assembly transmitted the Constitution (Sixth Alteration) Bill, 2026, to the 36 state Houses of Assembly on September 16 for consideration and approval, giving them an expected administrative timeframe of 30 days to communicate their decisions.

See also  PHOTOS: We’re repositioning Ogun as Nigeria’s leading destination for culture, tourism – Gov Abiodun

The proposed amendment seeks to establish a dual policing system comprising the Federal Police Service and state police services.

On October 9, the Senate was confident the amendment would secure the required backing, with Senate Committee on Media and Public Affairs Chairman Yemi Adaramodu saying at the time that four states — Edo, Oyo, Osun and Rivers — had approved the bill.

However, in a report published on October 16, PUNCH said five state assemblies — Edo, Osun, Oyo, Rivers and Zamfara — had approved the amendment, while the remaining 31 were yet to do so.

Meanwhile, PUNCH reported on October 15 that the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, had said the draft National Policing Bill was 90 per cent ready for transmission to the National Assembly after further deliberations by the Presidential Working Group.

On October 21, PUNCH reported that five additional state assemblies — Ogun, Delta, Plateau, Kwara and Adamawa — had approved the amendment, bringing the number of approving states to 10.

Continue Reading

News

One dies, three injured in Lagos building collapse

Published

on

One person has died while three others sustained injuries following the collapse of a building in the Fadeyi area of Lagos State.

The building collapsed on Akinola Street, off Ikorodu Road, on Friday morning.

Lagos building collapse
An emergency responder carries out a search-and-rescue operation at the scene of a building collapse in Lagos State on October 23, 2026. Photo: Channels TV

The Lagos State Emergency Management Agency said the cause of the incident was yet to be established, while rescue teams were working to determine how many site workers remained trapped beneath the rubble, Channels TV reports.

The agency said, “Emergency responders had launched a coordinated search-and-rescue operation to locate and evacuate any victims trapped under the collapsed structure.”

Lagos building collapse
An emergency responder carries out a search-and-rescue operation at the scene of a building collapse in Lagos State on October 23, 2026. Photo: Channels TV

LASEMA added that it was coordinating the response at the scene alongside other agencies and emergency personnel, including LRU paramedics, the Lagos State Fire Service, LASASA and the Alakara Division of the Nigeria Police Force.

Details later…

See also  ‘I hope social media won’t destroy Africa’ – Akpabio on story of Senate’s creation of 12 new states
Continue Reading

News

Umahi says South-East will vote differently in 2027 over Tinubu’s projects

Published

on

The Minister of Works, David Umahi, has described the South-East’s overwhelming support for Peter Obi in the 2023 presidential election as an “accident of history”, attributing the voting pattern to anger over the region’s alleged marginalisation under the previous administration.

Umahi said the region’s political outlook had changed under President Bola Tinubu, citing federal infrastructure projects and appointments as reasons he believed voters would respond differently in the 2027 election.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE News published on Friday, the minister said the South-East had reasons to feel aggrieved before Tinubu assumed office.

“In 2023, it was an accident of history,” Umahi continued, “It was a demonstration of the anger of the people of South East on how they were treated.”

He added, “We’ve been marginalised in the past, but it’s no longer so.”

Umahi argued that Tinubu had changed the situation through what he described as increased federal infrastructure investments and appointments for the region.

“If in 2023 they demonstrated their anger, in 2027 they are going to demonstrate their joy on how the President has treated them,” he said.

The former Ebonyi State governor maintained that the South-East would acknowledge Tinubu’s commitment to the region, particularly through major federal road projects and other investments.

He also said serving and former governors, traditional rulers and other influential figures in the South-East were increasingly aligning with Tinubu.

Umahi argued that voters would be reluctant to abandon what he described as infrastructure gains for another political “gamble”.

See also  Fake PFIPC agency scandal: Tinubu orders 30-day ICPC probe, Senate rejects blame

The minister rejected suggestions that South-East leaders supporting Tinubu were betraying the region or Obi, arguing that the region’s political interests should not be permanently tied to one candidate.

He also criticised social media supporters who insult South-East political leaders for backing Tinubu, saying such attacks would not advance Obi’s political interests or those of the region.

Umahi maintained that the South-East needed to engage and negotiate with other parts of Nigeria if it hoped to produce a president in the future.

Asked whether he believed Tinubu would defeat Obi in the South-East in 2027, Umahi responded, “Why do you say I believe? That is what is going to happen!”

The minister insisted that the circumstances that shaped the region’s voting pattern in 2023 had fundamentally changed.

Continue Reading

Trending