Connect with us

News

Nigerian embassy packed, 269 return as S’Africa protests rise due to Xenophobic tensions

Published

on

The Federal Government has assured Nigerians still residing in South Africa of their safety, even as fresh concerns over xenophobic tensions and renewed anti-immigrant protests continue to trigger calls for stronger diplomatic action.

This comes after Nigerians reportedly stormed the country’s embassy in Pretoria as xenophobic tensions escalated while another batch of 269 Nigerians evacuated from South Africa arrived at the Murtala Muhammed International Airport, Lagos, on Tuesday aboard an Air Peace flight from Johannesburg at 10.48 am, marking the second government-coordinated evacuation exercise in recent weeks.

Nigerian businessman popularly known as ‘Big Joe’ was reportedly shot and killed by unidentified gunmen on Sunday, outside his shop in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province, though local police have not announced cause of his death.

Thousands of locals marched in major cities across South Africa on Tuesday, calling for the removal of undocumented migrants from the country.

Police officers, supported by private security personnel, were deployed amid concerns that the demonstrations could turn violent. Anti-migrant groups had set Tuesday as a deadline for undocumented foreigners to leave.

In the wake of the protests, many foreign nationals have reportedly fled their communities due to fear of violence and intimidation. South African police said about 25,000 migrants have been repatriated so far, most of them from other African countries.

South African police said the protests were largely peaceful, although isolated incidents of looting, vandalism and assaults were recorded.

In Johannesburg, police maintained a strong presence across the city centre, while businesses remained closed in parts of the commercial district. The military was also deployed to Hillbrow, a suburb with a large migrant population, following reports that a teenager had been shot and a vehicle set ablaze.

Local media reported that protesters in Yeoville threw bricks at some homes occupied by migrants, while demonstrators in Germiston allegedly evicted suspected undocumented foreign nationals from their homes and handed them over to police for immigration checks.

Police said five people were arrested for allegedly looting a foreign-owned shop in Soweto. In KwaZulu-Natal Province, about 10 people were arrested over looting, while another woman was arrested for assaulting a police officer and a man was detained over alleged intimidation following the reported assault of a foreign national.

The leader of the anti-migrant group March and March, Jacinta Ngobese-Zuma, said the group would continue staging weekly protests over the next six months to pressure the government to deport undocumented migrants.

A member of another anti-migrant movement, Operation Dudula, told the BBC the group would continue pushing police to arrest foreigners found to be living in the country illegally.

On the eve of the protests, President Cyril Ramaphosa met with some protest leaders in an effort to ease tensions.

While acknowledging concerns over immigration, Ramaphosa urged demonstrators to remain peaceful and warned against intimidation and violence.

 

 

The Nigerian returnees’ arrival marked the second government-coordinated evacuation flight from South Africa.

“Some foreign nationals who live in South Africa are here lawfully,” the president said in his weekly newsletter.

“They work, study, raise families, invest in our economy and contribute positively to our society. They too are entitled to the protection of our laws and our Constitution.”

He added that the right to protest “does not allow people to threaten or intimidate others, or to engage in acts of vandalism or violence.”

South African authorities said about 50,000 undocumented migrants have been arrested since January, while approximately 25,000 have already been repatriated. Most are from other African countries.

On April 20, Amaramiro Emmanuel allegedly died after he was assaulted by members of the South African National Defence Force in Port Elizabeth. Days later, on April 26, Ekpenyong Andrew was reportedly arrested in Pretoria and was later found dead in a mortuary under circumstances that remain under investigation.

The Nigerian government demanded thorough investigations into both deaths, while Nigerian community organisations have continued to raise concerns over attacks on their members amid rising anti-foreigner sentiment.

Foreign Affairs ministry

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in a statement issued in Abuja and signed by its spokesperson, Mr. Kimiebi Ebienfa, said the Federal Government had intensified efforts to bring home Nigerians willing to return, particularly ahead of the June 30 (Tuesday) deadline set by South African groups for undocumented foreigners to leave the country.

Despite the deadline, the FG reassured Nigerians still in South Africa of their continued safety, pledging sustained high-level diplomatic engagement with the South African government to protect their interests.

Before Tuesday’s evacuation, 66 Nigerians returned to Lagos on June 24 aboard a Value Jet airline facilitated by its CEO, Kunle Soname.

The ministry said the latest batch of evacuees, who were accompanied by officials of the Nigerian Mission in South Africa, was received at the airport by senior officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs led by the Director of the African Affairs Department, Ambassador Haruna Ali-Gombe.

Speaking during the reception, Ali-Gombe conveyed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s message of reassurance to the returnees.

He said, “The batch of 269 evacuees, escorted by officials of the Nigerian Mission in South Africa, were officially received at the airport by senior officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs led by the Director, African Affairs Department, Ambassador Haruna Ali-Gombe, mni, who conveyed the heartfelt greetings and assurances of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR, to the returning nationals, reaffirming the Federal Government’s steadfast commitment to ensure the safety of Nigerian nationals living outside the country.”

 

 

The ministry stressed that the evacuation exercise remained ongoing despite the June 30 deadline imposed by South African authorities.

According to the ministry, additional evacuation flights are expected in the coming days to bring back all Nigerians who have completed the screening process and opted for voluntary return.

The ministry stated, “With the June 30 deadline on undocumented foreigners to leave South Africa, the Federal Government wishes to reiterate the fact that the evacuation process is still on course and more flights are expected in the country in the next few days to evacuate all Nigerians that have been screened and cleared to voluntarily return to the country. Government will continue to engage South African authorities at the highest levels to ensure the protection of Nigerian nationals living in the country.”

See also  Asylum seekers to pay £10,000 before settlement in UK

Announcing the arrival of the latest batch, the ministry said, “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs wishes to inform that the second evacuation flight from Johannesburg, South Africa, operated by Air Peace, arrived the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos, on Tuesday, 30th June 2026, at 10.48 am with 269 returnees. This is in addition to 66 returnees that arrived via South African Airways, facilitated by a good-spirited Nigerian, on the 24th of June, 2026.”

Nigerians stranded

Nigeria’s Acting High Commissioner to South Africa, Temitope Ajayi, on Tuesday said many Nigerians stranded outside the country’s mission in Pretoria during the anti-migrant protests ignored the embassy’s directives and instead responded to announcements made by community members.

Ajayi stated this while explaining reports of Nigerians sleeping outside the embassy and taking refuge in churches as the Federal Government continued the evacuation of citizens who volunteered to return home.

According to him, the mission has put in place a structured evacuation process and only invited screened individuals to report when their respective flights were ready.

He said, “The (Nigerian) community here puts people in a difficult situation. Our agreement was that it is only when the flight is coming that we call the people who are captured on the list because we have a list for different batches.

“The last time we called them, the community went overboard to announce that everybody should report, whereas that was not the case. It is not what we asked them to do.”

He added that some of those staying in churches and outside the embassy were not even part of the approved evacuation list.

He said, “Some of these people you said are staying at the church were those who defied the mission’s notification and followed the community’s notification. They found themselves in such a situation, which is uncalled for. Some of them were not even captured during the screening exercise. They just showed up, while some were told to exercise patience so that we could call them when it was their turn. We are following due process to ensure that everything is orderly.”

Meanwhile, hundreds of Nigerians have been screened for repatriation, while the Nigerian High Commission in Pretoria and the Nigerian Union South Africa continued to provide temporary shelter, food and other humanitarian assistance to affected citizens pending their evacuation.

The renewed tensions have also heightened concerns over the safety of Nigerians living in South Africa following a series of violent incidents in recent months.

 

 

Most recently, the alleged killing of two people has added to the growing list of cases involving Nigerians who have been killed in the country.

On the reported killing of a Nigerian in South Africa on Sunday, Ajayi said the Nigerian mission had begun engaging the South African police to establish the facts surrounding the incident.

The acting envoy also disclosed that the mission had continued to pursue justice in previous cases involving Nigerians allegedly killed in South Africa.

He said, “We are getting an initial report. We are getting detailed information to be clear on the circumstances surrounding that. We have been liaising with the police, and we are getting a preliminary report concerning that incident. Yes, he is a Nigerian living there, but we are getting the details.

“As you are aware, there is a case that happened in April, and there was the case of the Uber driver in February. We have submitted the case files to the government. We have written a protest note to the South African Ministry of Foreign Affairs. They said they have commenced investigations into the officers and those involved, and they will furnish us with the outcome of the investigation, which is what we are waiting for.”

Ajayi said the evacuation exercise ordered by the Federal Government was progressing, with hundreds of Nigerians already returned home.

He added that the Nigerian mission had continued to cater for distressed citizens awaiting evacuation.

 

 

The envoy said, “A total of 269 people arrived in Lagos this morning. The evacuation is ongoing. We have done about three batches now. The number remaining should be around 700, whom we are going to evacuate based on people who voluntarily showed interest in coming back to Nigeria.

“The mission has been taking care of those who come to the embassy claiming their rent has expired and other issues. At the mission now, we have close to 150 people. We are doing the evacuation in batches. When it gets to their batch, we will evacuate them.”

Also speaking, the President General of the Nigerian Union South Africa, Barrister Smart Nwobi, said the union had advised Nigerians to remain indoors while monitoring the anti-migrant protests across the country.

Nwobi said South African President Cyril Ramaphosa had assured that adequate security personnel had been deployed to prevent attacks during the protests.

He said, “We are still monitoring things. We instructed our people to close their shops and stay indoors.

“The South African President has assured that they have deployed enough resources for security agencies to ensure that no life or property is lost during the anti-migrant protest. As a union, we are monitoring things with our agents at every corner, and the police have reacted to cases where people wanted to take the law into their own hands. There is the use of rubber bullets, and police tanks are all over.”

According to him, the Nigerian Union, the Nigerian High Commission and other organisations had continued to provide humanitarian support for displaced Nigerians.

 

 

He said, “The returnees have gone to the Nigerian embassy where they are being fed by the Nigerian Union and other organisations. There are provisions of humanitarian relief, blankets and other necessities.

“About 79 men were taken to a nearby church after a pastor volunteered the facility as a refuge centre, while over 80 women and children remained at the Nigerian High Commission.”

Nwobi disclosed that more than 600 Nigerians had already been screened and cleared for repatriation, with additional evacuation flights expected.

He, however, noted that about 400 other screened Nigerians were still hoping to benefit from the FG’s evacuation exercise.

He said, “We still have more than 600 Nigerians who have already been screened and cleared to be repatriated on the Federal Government flights. Two of those flights have come, and we are expecting the third, fourth and fifth batches. The Nigerian High Commission has promised that the third batch might be here on Thursday.

“We are glad that the Federal Government, through President Bola Tinubu, has kept its promise to protect the lives of Nigerians. We thank everyone who has played a role in ensuring that our people are evacuated.”

See also  Atiku demands probe of N17.5tn pipeline security spending

Nwobi also called on state governments to emulate the Imo State Governor, Hope Uzodimma, who, according to him, provided N1m to returnees from the state to help them resettle.

 

 

He urged the FG to review Nigeria’s bilateral relationship with South Africa in view of recurring xenophobic attacks.

“Our government should review the agreement and relationship it has with South Africa in view of the ongoing xenophobia. Nigeria has received illegal immigrants without complaining,” he said.

Reacting to the protest, the President of the Association of Yorubas in Diaspora, South Africa, Dr Olusola Agbeniyi, said the planned anti-migrant demonstration ended peacefully without any reported attacks on Nigerians or other foreign nationals.

According to him, the protest was directed against illegal immigration and did not degenerate into violence.

“Today’s march ended peacefully. Nothing happened. They only protested against illegal immigrants,” Agbeniyi said.

NICASA appeal

Also, the Deputy Chairman of the Nigerian Citizens Association South Africa, Western Cape Province, Mr. Leo Azebeokhai, urged the FG to strengthen diplomatic engagement with South Africa to address the challenges facing Nigerians in the country amid renewed anti-immigrant protests.

 

 

He called on the FG to urgently intensify efforts to evacuate stranded Nigerians in South Africa.

Azebeokhai said Abuja should use diplomatic channels to facilitate the renewal of immigration documents and improve the welfare of Nigerians living in South Africa.

According to him, many Nigerians become undocumented not because they deliberately violate immigration laws but because they encounter difficulties renewing their Nigerian passports and South African permits.

He explained that the Nigerian Consulate in Johannesburg remains the only centre where Nigerians can renew their passports, forcing many to travel long distances from other provinces at considerable expense.

“People travel from different provinces to Johannesburg just to renew their passports. A return flight from Cape Town can cost more than R3,000, and many simply cannot afford it,” he said.

Azebeokhai noted that although NICASA leaders had repeatedly appealed to the consulate to deploy mobile passport enrolment facilities to other provinces, they had been informed that the mission was still awaiting approval and equipment from Nigeria.

He said the delays had resulted in many Nigerians carrying expired passports, thereby exposing them to immigration-related challenges.

 

 

“There are many people whose passports have expired, not because they don’t want to renew them but because they cannot access the renewal process,” he said.

“Our body, over time, has engaged the consulate and pleaded with them to find a way to come to different provinces so that they can have these people captured. But what the consulate keeps telling us is that they have applied for a machine, a mobile capture machine, from Nigeria, and they are still waiting.

“There are a lot of people who want their passports renewed but cannot renew them. So, a lot of passports expire because people can’t renew them, not because they don’t want to. So, when your passport expires, you become someone with expired documents.

“So, that is one way that the Nigerian government can at least do something. Nigerians in South Africa didn’t disappear from Nigeria and appear in South Africa. They came through the borders, they came through points of entry, like the airport.

“So, papers are expiring. We apply for document renewals, and it’s either delayed at Home Affairs and your document expires and nothing happens. I believe that the Nigerian government, through Foreign Affairs and all that, can engage its South African counterparts more, you know, it’s diplomacy.”

He also urged the Federal Government to engage South African authorities on the delays in processing residence permits, work permits and business permits, which he said had left many law-abiding Nigerians without valid documentation.

According to him, prolonged delays in renewing permits prevent Nigerians from working legally or operating their businesses despite submitting the necessary applications.

 

 

“We need our documents renewed. We want to work, we want to do business. If you don’t get your business permit, you can’t do business. If you don’t get your work permit, you can’t work.

And this is majorly because of the Nigerian government, which I believe has not really engaged the South African government. They have to push more. So, whatever they know they have to do with their counterparts here, they should just do it. Nigerians pay as much as R40,000 trying to renew documents, but don’t get them.

“The Nigerian government, through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, should engage more with its South African counterpart. This is about diplomacy. Nigerians need their documents renewed so they can work, do business and remain compliant with the law,” he said.

Azebeokhai added that stronger bilateral engagement would help address the administrative bottlenecks affecting Nigerians in South Africa and reduce the vulnerability of those whose immigration documents had expired while awaiting renewal.

Speaking further, Azebeokhai said delays in evacuation arrangements had left hundreds of Nigerians stranded after many abandoned their homes and livelihoods following earlier government assurances of repatriation.

He said the FG had promised five evacuation flights but only two had been deployed, leaving many Nigerians uncertain about their return, adding that nearly 600 people were affected, with some already assisted by unidentified private individuals. Azebeokhai noted that many evacuees were stranded in Pretoria and other areas after leaving their homes in expectation of the flights.

“The government promised that they were going to make available five airlines. So far, only two have moved,” he said.

 

 

“It’s about 596 nationals now, close to 600. About 66 were lifted by a citizen. We don’t even know who that person is, a Nigerian citizen who volunteered. Most people are kind of stranded. I am not sure what the situation is back home or why this is being delayed, but I believe the government should be able to do more.”

See also  FG activates evacuation plan as Middle East crisis worsens

He added that as at Tuesday morning, community leaders were struggling to provide immediate humanitarian support, noting that the NICASA leadership had convened an emergency meeting to coordinate assistance for affected Nigerians.

“This (Tuesday) morning, the President of NICASA had an emergency meeting with us where he asked for help. We’ve been trying to contribute some money so that we can get relief materials, maybe food and all that, for those who are stranded.

“These people were asked to leave where they were staying because they would be evacuated. Most of them gave up their homes, maybe sold their properties and all that, so they are kind of stranded. It’s winter in South Africa. People are hungry and stranded,” he said.

Ambassadors advise FG

Retired Nigerian ambassadors also called on the FG to strengthen diplomatic engagement with South African authorities, accelerate the evacuation of Nigerians willing to return home, and pursue long-term measures to prevent recurring attacks and the mistreatment of Nigerians in the country.

Retired Ambassador Ogbole Amedu-Ode commended the FG for initiating the evacuation of Nigerians but urged authorities to intensify efforts following reports of challenges in the airlift process.

 

 

He said, “The Federal Government is already engaging the South African authorities, and the airlifting of Nigerians concerned has commenced. However, going by some social media sources, there appear to be some hiccups in the airlift process. In that case, our authorities should double down on the airlift.”

The former envoy also stressed the need for sustained diplomatic engagement with South African authorities, noting that Nigeria could not physically intervene within another sovereign state.

“Secondly, there must be continuous monitoring of the situation and engagement with the South African authorities because Nigeria cannot physically go and secure its citizens, whether legally or illegally resident in the country. They have to be told the consequences of their inability to bring the unfortunate situation under their control.”

Also speaking, retired Ambassador to Algeria, Mohammed Mabdul, called for stronger diplomatic action, including summoning the South African Ambassador on a regular basis to account for efforts being made by the South African government to resolve the crisis.

He said, “Diplomatic engagement: The Ministry of Foreign Affairs should strongly protest the implementation of this policy by summoning the South African Ambassador on a regular basis to explain the efforts of the South African government towards resolving the impasse, as it negates the spirit of African unity.”

Mabdul further recommended the immediate establishment of an inter-ministerial committee to coordinate the evacuation and reintegration of Nigerians returning from South Africa.

According to him, “An inter-ministerial committee should be urgently set up to coordinate the immediate evacuation of Nigerians who are willing to return to Nigeria. Members of this committee should include the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Nigerians in Diaspora Commission, Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, National Commission for Refugees, Migrants and Internally Displaced Persons, Nigeria Immigration Service, and the National Emergency Management Agency. The committee should work harmoniously to address the problems of returnees to Nigeria.”

 

 

The retired diplomat also urged the Federal Government to escalate the matter to the African Union for collective action.

He said, “The matter should be tabled at a meeting of African Union Heads of State to address long-term solutions to these recurring issues. Joint decisions should be taken to apply sanctions and other measures against South Africa to serve as a deterrent to other member states.”

Mabdul further advised the government to discourage unnecessary travel to South Africa through a nationwide public awareness campaign.

He stated, “The Ministry of Information and National Orientation should embark on sensitisation programmes through news outlets, flyers and other channels to discourage Nigerians from travelling to South Africa, except those who have permanent residence or are gainfully employed with the relevant documents to stay in the country.”

He also proposed economic measures against South African business interests in Nigeria.

According to him, “The Federal Government should consider imposing economic sanctions on South African interests in Nigeria, including taking over companies such as MTN and DStv operating in the country.”

In addition, Mabdul urged Nigerian diplomatic missions in South Africa to work with international migration authorities to facilitate the orderly return of undocumented Nigerians.

 

 

He said, “The Nigerian Embassy in Pretoria and the Consulate General in Johannesburg should liaise with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) in South Africa to coordinate the swift repatriation of Nigerians living illegally by issuing the relevant documents that will facilitate their evacuation to Nigeria on a regular basis.”

NAUS vows protest

The National Association of University Students has condemned the reported xenophobic attacks against Nigerians in South Africa, warning of nationwide protests if the South African government fails to address the situation within one week.

Speaking at a press conference, NAUS President, Meshach Nwankwo, decried what he described as rising attacks, intimidation and hate speech targeting Nigerians and other African nationals, saying the incidents had heightened fears among Nigerian students and citizens.

“The National Association of University Students unequivocally condemns every act of xenophobia, hate speech and violence directed against Nigerians and indeed any African living lawfully in another African nation,” he said.

NAUS urged South African authorities to investigate all reported attacks, prosecute those responsible and provide adequate protection for foreign nationals. It also called on the South African High Commission in Nigeria to publicly reassure Nigerians of their safety.

“Nobody has the monopoly of wisdom. Nobody has the monopoly of violence,” Nwankwo said.

 

 

The association warned that if no concrete action is taken within one week, it would mobilise peaceful nationwide protests, pursue lawful measures against South African-owned businesses in Nigeria and relocate its national headquarters to the South African High Commission in Abuja as a sustained protest.

The warning comes amid renewed anti-migrant demonstrations in parts of South Africa, which have raised fresh concerns over the safety of foreign nationals and prompted the evacuation of hundreds of Nigerians.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Germany deports 137 Nigerians in five chartered flights

Published

on

Germany deported at least 137 Nigerian citizens in five documented chartered operations between February and June 2026, according to reports sighted by The PUNCH.

The documented arrivals comprised 27 Nigerians deported in February, 37 deported directly by Germany as part of a 50-person joint European Union operation in March, and 24, 23 and 26 Nigerians deported in April, May and June, respectively, according to figures contained in reports monitored by the DERS Team and Refugees4refugees.org.

The figures indicate an increase in the use of chartered flights to return Nigerians from Germany and other European countries, with several of the operations involving cooperation among European states.

On February 18, 2026, a batch of 27 Nigerians arrived at the Lagos Cargo Airport following a deportation operation from Germany.

According to Refugees4refugees.org, the flight was operated by World2fly and departed Stuttgart before arriving in Lagos shortly before 2 pm.

The report said the operation was primarily enforced by Germany, although one person, described as severely ill and mentally unfit, was transferred from Slovakia to join the 26 people deported from Germany.

It also identified Baden-Württemberg as a major participant in the operation and said Stuttgart had hosted both the December 2025 and February 2026 deportation operations to Nigeria.

The report further alleged that while some of those deported had serious health conditions, others had lived and worked in Germany for several years.

It cited the case of a single mother and her three children who were deported from the Sindelfingen district in Stuttgart despite reportedly having documentation relating to their residence status.

See also  IGP Disu meets NAPTIP DG, pledges stronger action against human trafficking

According to the report, the family subsequently returned to Germany after intervention by a volunteer and confirmation from local foreign authorities that the deportation had been made in error.

Furthermore, the February deportation also coincided with Nigeria’s participation in preparations for the Voluntary National Review of the Global Compact for Migration ahead of the 2026 International Migration Review Forum in New York.

The DERS Team said that Nigerian government agencies did not send representatives to receive the deportees at the airport, adding that the returning Nigerians were subsequently transported away from the airport without adequate assistance.

On March 10, another 50 people were deported to Nigeria in a joint EU operation hosted by Germany in cooperation with Spain, Austria and Belgium.

Germany accounted directly for 37 of the deportations, according to the figures provided.

The operation was described as the largest single deportation involving Nigerians in the three years referenced in the report.

A further 24 Nigerians, including women and a minor, were deported on April 9 on a chartered flight from Frankfurt organised through Frontex and German authorities, according to the supplied data.

In May 2026, another batch of 23 deportees was returned to Nigeria, while 26 Nigerians arrived in Lagos on June 17 following another routine chartered deportation flight.

Taken together, the five documented batches amounted to 137 Nigerians returned to the country between February and June 2026.

The figures highlight the continued use of organised charter flights in the enforcement of migration decisions involving Nigerians in Europe.

Migration rights advocates have, however, continued to argue that deportation policies should be accompanied by adequate safeguards for vulnerable people and proper procedures to prevent wrongful removal.

See also  Chimamanda Adichie lawyers write Lagos hospital, doctor suspended

While migration is as old as time itself, identified underlying factors driving irregular migration include conflict, exploitation, climate-related pressures and economic inequality.

Migration is the permanent or temporary movement of people from one place to another, changing their home. It can happen within a country or across borders, shaping populations, cultures, and job markets.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Adeyemi demands media, lawyers’ presence before Reps probe on PFIPC scandal

Published

on

The House of Representatives Ad Hoc Committee investigating the controversy surrounding the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council is yet to decide where it will question the council’s self-appointed Director-General, Adeniyi Adeyemi, a source familiar with the committee’s proceedings has disclosed.

The development comes as Adeyemi insisted that his lawyers and journalists must be present before he submits to questioning by the House committee.

The committee, chaired by the lawmaker representing Kanke/Kanam/Pankshin Federal Constituency of Plateau State, Yusuf Gagdi, is probing how the PFIPC secured official office accommodation within the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of more than N1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act despite allegedly having no legal existence.

The investigation has attracted significant public attention following allegations that the council operated within government structures despite lacking legal recognition, raising concerns about possible lapses in public financial management and institutional oversight.

Adeyemi, who has been in police custody over the controversy surrounding the council, is expected to appear before the committee this week, following testimonies from several senior government officials.

However, as of Sunday, the venue for the much-anticipated session remained unsettled.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorised to discuss the committee’s proceedings with the media, confirmed the development in response to an inquiry by The PUNCH.

Asked whether the committee had chosen a venue for Adeyemi’s appearance, the source simply replied, “No decision yet.”

The development followed the committee’s hearings with key government officials, including the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack; the Director-General of the Budget Office of the Federation, Tanimu Yakubu; the Director of Banking Services at the Central Bank of Nigeria, Hamisu Abdullahi; and representatives of the Inspector-General of Police.

The officials’ testimonies reportedly raised questions about how Adeyemi allegedly presented himself as the head of the PFIPC and secured recognition and access within government circles.

Adeyemi had, through his lawyers, indicated his willingness to appear before the committee publicly and respond to questions concerning the allegations.

However, Gagdi said the committee would determine the venue for the session at a later date.

Meanwhile, the Coalition of United Political Parties has rejected the findings of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission on the PFIPC controversy, describing the investigation as inadequate and calling for a broader and transparent inquiry.

In an interview with our correspondent, CUPP spokesperson, Agu Bryan, said the ICPC’s report, which reportedly cleared the Presidency of wrongdoing while indicting Adeniyi Adeyemi, failed to answer critical questions about how an allegedly non-existent government agency was able to operate at such a high level.

“The ICPC probe of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council which exonerated the Presidency and indicted Adeniyi Adeyemi is nothing short of a charade,” Bryan said.

He argued that the report appeared to portray Adeyemi as having operated almost entirely alone, despite the scale of activities attributed to him.

See also  Lagos bond subscription hits N310bn

According to Bryan, such an operation could not have continued without assistance or enabling actions by officials within government institutions.

“As Nigerians, we know that someone could not have operated an alleged high-profile agency of such magnitude without enablers, either within the Presidency or across the government agencies involved,” he said.

Bryan called for a broader examination of the roles allegedly played by government institutions referenced in Adeyemi’s correspondence, including the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Central Bank of Nigeria and the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation.

He particularly cited the testimony of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Didi Walson-Jack, that her office failed to conduct due diligence on some of the documents associated with the controversial council.

The coalition also questioned how the PFIPC allegedly found its way into the national budget if, as reported by the ICPC, it had no legal foundation.

CUPP said the National Assembly and relevant government ministries owed Nigerians an explanation over how funds were appropriated to an organisation whose legal status had allegedly not been established.

“The National Assembly, particularly the House of Representatives, which appropriated funds to an agency that, according to the investigation, never existed as a creation of law, also owes Nigerians an explanation,” Bryan said.

He asked who within the Ministry of Budget and National Planning processed the budget line attributed to the PFIPC and what verification mechanisms were applied before public funds were appropriated.

CUPP also raised questions about the alleged recruitment of hundreds of staff and the extent to which Adeyemi was granted access to official government activities.

Bryan said the issues went beyond determining whether Adeyemi forged documents, arguing that investigators should establish how he allegedly gained access to government processes and institutions.

The controversy escalated after investigators reportedly established that a signature attributed to the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, was forged.

CUPP said the finding should prompt investigators to examine other official documents and correspondence allegedly used by Adeyemi.

“It is commendable that the House and the Police have established that the signature of the Chief of Staff to the President was allegedly forged. But that raises another critical question: how many other documents, official correspondences and signatures allegedly used by Adeyemi were also forged?” Bryan asked.

He said Nigerians deserved to know the full extent of the alleged deception and whether officials responsible for verifying the credentials of individuals dealing with public institutions failed in their duties.

The coalition further questioned how the PFIPC allegedly acquired sufficient official recognition to participate in government processes and appear in the national budget.

“How did a supposedly non-existent agency attain such a level of official recognition and attention that it found its way into the national budget?” he asked.

CUPP also called for Adeyemi to be given a fair opportunity to defend himself before the House committee, arguing that a transparent confrontation with the evidence could help determine whether other individuals or institutions were involved.

See also  PHOTOS: NAFDAC enforces nationwide ban on sachet, small PET bottle alcohol

“Was Adeyemi given fair hearing thus far? Has he been given the privilege to appear before the Yusuf Gagdi-led Ad hoc Committee of the House of Representatives probing the matter to be interrogated and directly answer questions?” Bryan said.

He invoked the legal principle nemo judex in causa sua—that no person should be a judge in his own cause—in arguing that the investigation should be conducted independently and transparently.

Bryan said anything short of an open and impartial investigation would fail to satisfy public expectations.

He also criticised the ICPC’s handling of the matter and called for independent professional bodies to be considered if the Federal Government was genuinely interested in establishing the facts.

“If President Tinubu is determined to unravel the truth, independent organisations or bodies like the NBA, West African Bar Association or international or private investigators should be allowed to come in and take over the investigation,” Bryan said.

He accused federal security and anti-corruption agencies of lacking sufficient independence to investigate the controversy objectively, a claim the agencies have not accepted.

The House committee’s inquiry follows mounting concerns over how Adeyemi allegedly operated the PFIPC, secured government recognition and participated in official engagements despite questions over the organisation’s legal status.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the roles of several government institutions whose officials allegedly interacted with Adeyemi or processed documents connected to the council.

The committee is expected to hear directly from Adeyemi as it seeks to establish how the PFIPC was created, how it operated, who recognised it and whether public funds were allocated or expended in connection with its activities.

 

 

His appearance before the committee could therefore prove significant in determining whether the alleged scheme was the work of an individual or involved officials and institutions within government.

Adeyemi demands media

Adeyemi, through his lawyer, Ademola Oyedokun, had on Wednesday rejected the House committee’s decision to question him at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The committee subsequently attempted to question him on Thursday, but Adeyemi declined to respond to its questions, prompting the lawmakers to reschedule the interrogation for Monday.

However, a family source said Adeyemi had informed the committee that he would only submit to questioning if journalists and his legal representatives were allowed to be present.

“They eventually rescheduled to Monday and my brother told them that when they are coming, they should come with the media, otherwise he will not grant them audience.

“Initially, they agreed to come with the media, but later they said they would not be coming with any media. They said if he refuses to grant them audience, they will go ahead and conclude their investigation and it will be said that he was the one who failed to grant them audience,” the source said.

The development came a day after Adeyemi’s family raised concerns over an attempt by members of the House committee to question him in police custody without his lawyers present.

Adeyemi’s brother, Peter, alleged that the detained promoter declined to answer questions because his legal representatives were absent.

“The Reps committee came and wanted to interrogate him, but he refused. They are still there trying to make him talk without any of his lawyers being present. We are crying out loud so that the right thing would be done.

“He has stated that he wants to be quizzed the same way others who have accused him have spoken. It’s not that he is not willing to state his side of the story,” he said.

When contacted on whether the police were aware of the committee’s proposed visit and whether the lawmakers would be granted access to Adeyemi, the police spokesperson, Ani Ineidu, said visitors would be allowed provided they met the necessary requirements.

“Yes, if they have necessary documents. I’m not aware if they have relevant documents or authorisation, but if they fulfil the conditions, everybody who is under police custody has a right to visitors.

“So, in a case like this, if they have that right, they will be granted access,” Ineidu said.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, Oyedokun said his client welcomed the House investigation into the alleged establishment and operations of the PFIPC but opposed what he described as a closed-door interrogation.

“We have read that the committee intends to interview our client at an undisclosed date and place. We ask it, respectfully, to think again.

“Everyone else in this matter has been heard in public, and what has been said about our client was said in public. He should be allowed to answer in the same place it was said,” the lawyer stated.

The committee had on Tuesday announced that it would question Adeyemi at an undisclosed location while he remains in police custody.

The Chairman of the committee, Yusuf Gagdi, said the arrangement was necessary to avoid interfering with ongoing investigations by the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission.

Gagdi said the committee had invited Adeyemi but was informed by the police that he remained in custody pursuant to a court order.

He added that the National Assembly would not act in a manner that undermined the judiciary or violated the principle of separation of powers, stressing that lawmakers lacked the authority to override an existing court order directing Adeyemi’s detention.

 

 

The committee is investigating allegations surrounding the creation and operations of the PFIPC, including claims of impersonation, forgery, financial impropriety and the unlawful use of government facilities and official insignia.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Osun-Osogbo: Priestess defends 10-year-old Arugba, dismisses child abuse claims

Published

on

The Araba of Osogbo, Ifáyemí Elébuibón, has defended the tradition of selecting a young maiden as the Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, describing the role as a privilege rather than child abuse.

This is as a priestess and custodian of Osun Osogbo also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.


Osun-Osogbo: Priestess

Elébuibón spoke in a video interview posted on Sunday by Yoruba cultural content creator, Wàá Ṣeré, amid discussions surrounding the age and responsibilities of the 10-year-old Arugba, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi.

Arugba is the young maiden chosen to carry the sacred calabash during the annual Osun-Osogbo Festival procession to the Osun Sacred Grove.

Alimot, a member of the royal family of the Ataoja of Osogbo, was selected through traditional Ifa divination in March 2025.

She carried the sacred calabash for the first time during this year’s procession to the Osun Sacred Grove on Friday, after she was unable to do so during the 2025 festival because of her young age.


10-year-old Arugba of the Osun-Osogbo Festival, Princess Alimot Osunbunmi carries the sacred calabash at Osun Osogbo festival…Photo Credit: Dewunmi Lagos

Explaining the role and its benefit, Elébuibón said the Arugba served as a spiritual intermediary between the Osun deity and the people.

He added that the responsibility was not determined by biological age.

“You see those people saying all that? They lack understanding. They don’t know. Whoever says the Arugba is too young—this one is ten years old, but some started at five!

See also  Kebbi gov approves N2.11bn for gratuities of 772 retirees, families

“The role the Arugba plays is a role of spiritual maturity, not about physical age. What the Arugba does for the town and the community is what the white man calls a ‘medium’—an intermediary between the Orisa and the people,” he said.

Elébuibón said the young maiden could communicate the wishes of the deity to the people because of the spiritual significance attached to the position.

“As young as she is, provided she remains pure and undefiled by any man, she can wake up one morning and say, ‘Mother Osun said this and that, do this, do that, don’t do this.’”

He added that the Arugba’s spiritual development was not necessarily tied to her physical age.

“Very soon, she will mature spiritually far beyond her biological age because the Orisa themselves nourish and care for them. Her role is not about age; what she does is not about age.”


FILE: Ifayemi Elebuibon

A female priestess and culture custodian, in another video posted by culture content creator Olamide Oseyifunmii, also defended the practice, saying the Arugba was selected through Ifa divination from the royal lineage.

According to her, the chosen maiden must be a virgin and is expected to observe certain taboos associated with the role.

“Whomever Ifa chooses becomes the Arugba. The Arugba must be a girl who remains untouched, pure, and a virgin. That is strictly what the Arugba must be,” she said.

She rejected the description of the practice as child abuse, saying the young girls selected for the role were traditionally protected and treated with care.

See also  Chimamanda Adichie lawyers write Lagos hospital, doctor suspended

“Being selected as the Arugba carries taboos and honours; it is not what Westerners label as ‘child abuse’.”

The priestess said the Arugba was not expected to carry heavy loads apart from the sacred calabash during the annual procession.

She also explained the spiritual significance attached to the young maiden, saying devotees who bow before the Arugba were not worshipping the child but honouring the Osun deity believed to be represented through her.

“They were bowing to the divine spirit of Osun Ewuji inside her and upon her head,” she said.

The 2026 Osun-Osogbo Festival, which began on August 7, is being held at the Osun Sacred Grove in Osogbo, Osun State, and will run until August 19.

The annual festival, centred on the Osun deity, is one of Nigeria’s major traditional and cultural festivals and attracts worshippers, tourists and cultural enthusiasts from Nigeria and beyond.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending