Connect with us

News

COP30: Presidency, Obi clash over 423-man Nigeria delegation

Published

on

The Presidency on Sunday defended the size and spread of Nigeria’s delegation to COP30, saying the climate talks require officials from many ministries and agencies to protect the country’s interests.

The Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mr. Temitope Ajayi, argued that climate negotiations cut across energy, finance, environment, transport, agriculture and security, making a narrow team disadvantageous.

Responding to inquiries by our correspondent, Ajayi said, “Because of the multidisciplinary and multidimensional nature of the climate subject, you will typically see government officials from different agencies who are representing the government’s interest across different subject-matter areas.

“It is so because the issues being discussed are vast and the government must be represented at every point to advance the Nigerian government’s position.”

His comments come hours after the presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the 2023 election, Mr. Peter Obi, accused the Tinubu-led government of what he called a “stunning display of misplaced priorities” for sending a 749-member delegation to COP30.

A breakdown of the delegates list shared by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and seen by The PUNCH shows that 749 names carry Nigeria’s party badge across the “Parties” and “Parties overflow” lists, an categorisation that includes civil society, private-sector actors, academics and partners who registered under Nigeria.

However, the number of delegates from government entities was around 423. This includes the Federal Ministry of Environment, NCCC, NESREA, NOSDRA, NiMet, NIHSA, other clearly labelled federal MDAs such as Finance, Trade, Power, Solid Minerals, Agriculture & Food Security, Housing, Water Resources & Sanitation, Marine & Blue Economy, Works/Transport/Aviation), the National Assembly/Presidency/FCTA, state governments, and named regulators/SOEs such as NNPC Ltd, NUPRC, NMDPRA, NPA, NCAA, NRC.

Obi had argued that China, the world’s second-largest economy with a population of over 1.4 billion, sent 789 delegates to the event held in Belém, Brazil.

See also  PHOTOS: Ex-president Shehu Shagari’s last surviving widow d!es at 89

In a Saturday post on his official X handle titled ‘In Delegations, Nigeria competes well,’ the former Anambra State Governor said, “Again, in a bitter twist of irony, we thank Nigeria for having the third-largest delegation at COP30, with 749 delegates, similar to China with 789 delegates.

“While Nigeria needs to have a strong voice in global climate discussions, this spectacle comes at a heavy cost to our people, with about 150 million living in multidimensional poverty, struggling daily with food insecurity, inadequate healthcare, and limited access to basic services.

“Yet, our leaders travel in large numbers, funded by taxpayers, attending climate talks abroad while the citizens they are meant to serve continue to suffer.

“Compared to China, which had about the same contingency, China has a high HDI, while Nigeria has a low one, with a key measure of life expectancy at the lowest 54 years, against China’s 79 years.”

Obi noted that China’s GDP stands at $18.74tn, while Nigeria’s is a little over $200bn, barely one per cent of that size.

He said China’s GDP per capita is about $13,300, whereas Nigeria’s is about 10 per cent of that.

According to him, 63 per cent of Nigerians live in multidimensional poverty, which is about 150 million people, the highest number in the world, facing deprivations in health, education, and living standards, while it is only 3.9 per cent in China; meanwhile, China’s population is about seven times larger than ours.

“This stark contrast illustrates why Nigeria should not be sending a delegation of this size. The human and financial resources expended on hundreds of officials travelling abroad could instead be directed toward urgent social investments at home, improving healthcare, education, and living conditions to lift our people out of poverty,” Obi stated.

Nigeria’s party list for COP30 contains at least 1,452 names, drawn from the National Council on Climate Change, the Federal Ministry of Environment, other MDAs, the National Assembly, state governments, banks, oil and gas firms, consultancies, universities, and dozens of non-governmental organisations.

See also  NDC seeks Gbajabiamila’s sack, independent probe on PFIPC scandal

Many are recorded as “guests of the nominating entity” or as having “paid relationships/contracts with an affiliate,” indicating private or project funding rather than federal sponsorship.

Responding to uproar over Nigeria’s delegate size at the global event, Ajayi said most attendees worldwide are non-state actors, whose names are nonetheless counted under their countries of origin.

“A larger majority of attendees at COPs are usually CSOs, activists and private sector players. It is called the Conference of Parties for a reason. Participants are listed against their countries where they registered from,” he explained.

“If people from Environmental Right Action are attending, for example, and I know a number of friends from climate-focused non-governmental organisations in Brazil, their attendance will be registered against Nigeria because that is their country of origin and where they registered from. Does it mean the government paid for them? They are not sponsored by the government,” he added.

He said the same applies to prominent Nigerian business leaders who choose to attend the summit.

“If Dangote, Tony Elumelu or Kola Adesina, for example and other actors in the energy sector are attending COP, does it mean they are part of the government delegation or sponsored by the government?” he asked.

The aide faulted what he called “shallow commentary” around COP attendance, insisting that Nigeria must show up strongly where decisions on climate finance, carbon markets and energy transition are taken.

“There must be context and nuance to this type of analysis,” he added.

Another senior official in the presidency simply stated, “Not all those people who went there were sponsored by the government.”

See also  NiMet lists Sokoto, Zamfara, Kebbi as high-risk states for meningitis

In 2023, Nigeria’s delegation size at the COP28 Summit in Dubai attracted harsh criticism.

At the time, Ajayi noted that the delegates, who included those from Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region, were at the Summit to promote their respective causes.

However, the number of Nigerian delegates grew from 1,411 at COP28 to 1,453 at COP30.

An analysis of the delegate list published by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change revealed that 1,453 Nigerians registered for COP30, cutting across federal and state governments, parliament, academia, private sector and civil society. Seven hundred and forty-nine delegates are from various government agencies.

The single largest bloc was the core climate agencies including officials of the Federal Ministry of Environment, the National Council on Climate Change, NESREA, NOSDRA, NiMet, NIHSA and related climate-change project desks, comprising hundreds of directors, technical officers and advisers.

Energy and extractive regulators such as NNPC Ltd., NUPRC, NMDPRA, Gas Aggregation Company Nigeria Ltd, PTDF and HYPREP were also on the delegation, alongside marine, ports, rail, aviation and water-resources agencies tied to blue-economy and decarbonisation plans.

Several states, including Lagos, Rivers, Delta, Kogi, Oyo, Kaduna, Borno, Nasarawa, Cross River and Akwa Ibom registered commissioners, permanent secretaries, climate directors and lawmakers.

National Assembly members and aides, finance, trade, power, solid minerals, agriculture, housing and youth MDAs, universities, standards bodies and development commissions were also on the list.

Asides from government agencies, private-sector energy and finance players, NGOs, youth and women’s networks, media organisations and professional bodies, as well as staff of Nigerian missions abroad were also on the list.

Most entries were tagged “guest of the nominating entity”, with others marked as contract/affiliate staff or partners and sponsors.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  PHOTOS: Ex-president Shehu Shagari’s last surviving widow d!es at 89

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  PHOTOS: Abiodun boosts grassroots governance with SUVs for LG Chairmen

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  NDC seeks Gbajabiamila’s sack, independent probe on PFIPC scandal

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Reps probe tax law tweaks, PDP demands suspension

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  Reps probe tax law tweaks, PDP demands suspension

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  PHOTOS: 10 rescued, over 40 feared d3ad in Sokoto boat mishap

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending