Connect with us

Business

10 states plan N4.3tn borrowing to fund 2026 budgets

Published

on

Ten states are planning to source about N4.287tn from loans, bonds, grants, capital receipts, and public-private partnerships to finance capital projects in their 2026 budgets. Collectively, the states, including Lagos, Abia, Ogun, Enugu, Osun, Delta, Sokoto, Edo, Bayelsa, and Gombe, presented budgets totalling N14.174tn to lawmakers.

An analysis of these budgets by The PUNCH shows that these states are increasingly turning to non-recurring financing beyond statutory federal transfers, including allocations from the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee, value-added tax receipts, and internally generated revenue, to support ambitious infrastructure and development projects.

Economists say Nigeria’s growing reliance on borrowing is not mainly because the country lacks revenue but because public funds are poorly managed. They argue that budgets, which should strictly guide government spending, are often ignored, while weak oversight and revenue leakages force governments to rely on loans. Although borrowing can help fund development when used carefully, frequent and unchecked borrowing risks creating long-term debt problems and passing today’s failures onto future generations.

In Lagos State, the commercial hub with the nation’s largest subnational budget, Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu proposed a N4.237tn budget for 2026. Of this, N3.12tn will come from IGR and federal transfers, leaving N1.117tn (26.4 per cent) to be raised through loans and bonds to finance capital projects. Even for a state with IGR comparable to some smaller African countries, borrowing remains a key mechanism to fund ambitious infrastructure and development initiatives.

Former Vice-Chancellor of Crescent University, Prof Sheriffdeen Tella, told The PUNCH that states should live within their means and focus on improving internally generated revenue.

“States were not originally meant to borrow because they are largely dependent on allocations from the federal government,” he said, adding that weak fiscal discipline at the centre has encouraged similar behaviour at the subnational level.

According to him, the Federal Government’s own heavy borrowing has weakened its ability to restrain states, resulting in a system where all tiers of government accumulate debt, creating long-term problems for future generations.

Abia State’s N1.016tn budget illustrates the challenges facing smaller, less commercially driven states. Under Governor Alex Otti, who is spearheading a revival of years of neglected infrastructure, the state expects to generate N607.2bn from FAAC allocations, value-added tax, grants, and other federal revenue channels. This leaves a funding gap of N409bn, or 40.3 per cent, which the government plans to cover through borrowing and other non-recurring sources.

See also  Atiku, Obi, Makinde resist step-down pressure ahead of 2027 polls

Abia made verifiable progress in 2025, emerging as one of the leading states for domestic debt reduction. As of March 31, 2025, Abia’s domestic debt stood at N48.67bn, marking a 57.2 per cent decline from the previous year. By Q2 2025, the figure was reported at N48.6bn, the Debt Management Office recorded.

Governor Dapo Abiodun’s Ogun State N1.669tn “Budget of Sustainable Legacy” anticipates N509.88bn from internally generated revenue and N554.81bn from federal transfers, but loans and grants of N518.9bn (31.1 per cent) will be required to fund its capital projects.

In the first half of 2025, total state external debt in Nigeria rose slightly to $4.812bn, with Ogun State accounting for $21.8m of the increase.

Prof Tella warned that the persistent turn to borrowing reflects poor revenue management rather than a lack of income, insisting that Nigeria’s core fiscal challenge is revenue leakage and misappropriation.

“As far as I am concerned, revenue is not Nigeria’s problem. The problem is the stealing of the revenue,” he said, noting that public funds that should strengthen government finances are often lost, making borrowing appear inevitable.

Enugu State plans a N1.62tn budget for 2026, a 66.5 per cent increase over 2025. While N870bn from IGR and N387bn from federal allocations will cover recurrent expenditure and some developmental spending, N329bn (20.3 per cent) will come from loans and capital receipts.

The DMO reported that in Q2 2025, Enugu State had the highest domestic debt in the South-East, with a stock of N180.5bn, more than 10 times that of Ebonyi, the region’s least indebted state, which stood at N15.8bn.

“Budgeting in Nigeria does not make any sense to some of us. It no longer makes sense at all,” Assistant General Secretary of the Nigeria Labour Congress, Chris Onyeka, told our correspondent. “When budget performance is at 30 per cent, what is the point? When budgets are violated and not implemented, extra-budgetary expenses become the order of the day.”

See also  NLC rejects petrol price hike, demands more crude for refineries

He questioned the effectiveness of Nigeria’s budgeting process, arguing that budgets have lost their force as binding legal instruments due to weak enforcement.

Onyeka said a budget is meant to serve as a guide that outlines government revenue expectations and spending plans for the coming year, noting that once approved by the legislature, it becomes law and should be strictly followed by the executive. “If you go outside the law, it means you have broken the law, and when laws are broken, there should be consequences,” he said.

Further, Osun State’s N723.45bn budget relies on N421.25bn in recurrent revenue, with N286.01bn (39.5 per cent) from capital receipts to fund its projects. The state significantly reduced its debt profile in 2025 under Governor Ademola Adeleke. External debt fell from $91.78m to $75.14m, a decline of 18.13 per cent, while domestic debt dropped from N148.37bn in 2022 to N83.32bn in 2025, a reduction of N65bn, or 43.84 per cent.

In Delta State, expected growth in internally generated revenue, projected at N250bn, combined with N720bn in federal transfers, still leaves N694bn (41.7 per cent) from loans and grants to fund capital expenditure in its N1.664tn budget. Sokoto State’s N758.7bn “Budget of Socio-Economic Expansion” will see N233.8bn (30.8 per cent) sourced from grants, aid, and capital development funds, while Edo State will cover N299bn (31.8 per cent) of its N939.85bn budget through loans, grants, and public-private partnerships.

The NLC executive said breaches of budgetary provisions often go unpunished, creating a system where accountability is selective. He said laws are typically enforced only when they affect ordinary citizens and workers, while government officials face little or no consequences for violations.

According to him, this lack of accountability undermines public confidence in the budget process and weakens fiscal discipline. On the issue of borrowing, Onyeka said debt itself was not a crime, stressing that borrowing could be justified if it is properly utilised to stimulate economic activity and support growth.

See also  FG debt repayments exceed budget allocation by nearly N2tn

Bayelsa State, another oil-dependent economy, plans N74.9bn (7.4 per cent) of its N1.01tn budget from loans and grants, while Gombe State’s N535.7bn “Budget of Consolidation” is the most dependent, with N325.5bn (60.8 per cent) expected from loans and capital receipts.

Under Governor Sheriff Oborevwori, Delta State reduced its domestic debt in 2025 through repayments rather than new borrowings. Domestic debt stood at N204.67bn as of June 30, 2025, down slightly from N204.72bn in March, with a Q2 reduction of N93.92bn noted in analyses. Although the state remains among the more heavily indebted, the decline reflects a measure of fiscal caution amid national trends.

Bayelsa State maintained one of the lowest domestic debt profiles among Nigerian states as of mid-2025 under Governor Douye Diri. Domestic debt fell to N65.99bn by June 30, 2025, down from N73.53bn in March, reflecting a N7.54bn reduction in Q2. The state remains the least indebted in the South-South region.

Tella also criticised the handling of savings from reforms such as fuel subsidy removal and naira devaluation, alleging that the gains are shared among different tiers of government without clear evidence of impact at the state level.

He said the absence of public accountability and sustained pressure on government officials has allowed the situation to persist, undermining fiscal sustainability and public trust.

Last week, fiscal expert Aliyu Ilias told our correspondent that states with low IGR are particularly vulnerable. He warned that over one-third of budgets in several states depend on non-recurring funds, which could undermine fiscal sustainability if borrowing and external funding do not materialise on time.

Managing Director of Optimus by Afrinvest, Dr Ayodeji Ebo, said, “Relying heavily on loans and grants for capital projects exposes states to funding delays and increases debt servicing obligations. For long-term sustainability, states must focus on building durable local revenue sources rather than depending excessively on external inflows.”

punch.ng

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Atiku, Obi, Makinde resist step-down pressure ahead of 2027 polls

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  El-Rufai: DSS detains five over airport incident, N1bn suit hangs

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  36 states’ budgets jump 47% to N40tn, capital spending falls

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  First Abu Dhabi Bank to open Nigerian office in sub-Saharan push

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending