Connect with us

Politics

Power rotation debate heats up as North reviews Tinubu’s scorecard

Published

on

The long-simmering debate over Nigeria’s power rotation arrangement flared up again on Tuesday as northern political leaders, technocrats, traditional rulers, and civil society actors converged on Kaduna to assess President Bola Tinubu’s performance two years into his tenure.

The high-powered meeting, convened by the Sir Ahmadu Bello Memorial Foundation and held at the historic Arewa House, brought together some of the most influential voices from across the 19 northern states and the Federal Capital Territory.

The two-day event, themed “Assessing Electoral Promises: Fostering Government-Citizen Engagement for National Unity,” underscored both the region’s weight in national politics and the urgency of the questions being asked about Nigeria’s future under Tinubu.

Top dignitaries in attendance included the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume; the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu; the Chief of Defence Staff, Gen Christopher Musa; and other service chiefs — all northerners appointed by Tinubu.

Representing the President, Akume assured the gathering that Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope Agenda” was already delivering results.

North should wait

In what appeared to be a warning to northern politicians already preparing for 2027, Akume reminded the gathering that by the principle of rotation, the North’s turn would not come until 2031.

“In 1999, northern patriots like Solomon Lar, Adamu Ciroma, Abubakar Rimi, and Jerry Gana agreed that power rotation is key to peace and national cohesion. Based on that unwritten understanding, the North will be eligible again in 2031,” he declared.

He urged patience, saying, “Let us be patient. Nigeria will not cease to exist before 2031. When it’s our turn, the nation will know.”

Afenifere, MBF react

The Middle Belt Forum expressed agreement with Akume on the issue of power rotation in Nigeria.

In an interview with The PUNCH in Jos on Tuesday, the National President of the Middle Belt Forum, Bitrus Pogu, said as long as the country practices rotation, which is a gentleman’s agreement rather than a constitutional provision, Akume’s statement that the North should wait until 2031 for the presidency holds water.

Pogu emphasised that the agreement on rotation was initially made by the PDP, not the APC, but believes it’s essential to respect such arrangements for peaceful transition and coexistence in a plural society like Nigeria.

“Yes, a southerner is in the presidential seat at the moment, and another southerner could contest for the seat; then the North should be patient till 2031,” Pogu stated.

However, Pogu lamented that Nigeria’s current situation is “unfortunate” due to the country’s inability to transcend ethnic and regional divisions.

“We are still at an archaic arrangement where anybody who comes in tries to satisfy his people to the maximum at the expense of others,” he noted, highlighting the need for a more inclusive and nationalistic approach to leadership.

While the Middle Belt Forum acknowledges the current power rotation arrangement, Pogu believes that Nigeria’s divisions are a legacy of British colonial rule and that a radical shift in approach is needed to foster national unity.

“It will take some radical person coming on board to be able to dismantle this thing so that Nigerians from anywhere, given his pedigree, can become president,” he said, expressing hope for a more united and inclusive Nigeria in the future.

See also  Dele Momodu, Fani-Kayode, Omokri in war of words over Tinubu - See details

The pan-Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, threw its weight behind Akume.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Tuesday, the Organising Secretary of the group, Kole Omololu, said, “We commend the SGF’s firm and principled articulation of the necessity to uphold the unwritten but nationally recognised convention of power rotation.

“It is our conviction, and evidently his as well, that for the sake of equity and cohesion, the Presidency must remain in the South until 2031.

“This position, rooted in historical precedent and political decorum, is a stabilising message that Nigerians of goodwill should embrace. The call for restraint by Northern politicians who are prematurely eyeing the 2027 contest is both prudent and patriotic.

“Akume’s clarification that the Renewed Hope Agenda is not an empty slogan but a structured governance blueprint deserves commendation.

“His emphasis on transparency, rule of law, and participation as guiding principles reflects the kind of clarity and accountability that must characterise public service.

“It is incumbent upon every region, particularly those who overwhelmingly supported the present administration, to assess government performance not by sentiment, but through data, delivery and strategic impact.”

He added, “We note the ongoing projects listed, including the rehabilitation of the Kaduna refinery, the expansion of gas pipelines, and railway lines connecting economic corridors. These are significant undertakings which, if completed with sincerity and competence, can catalyse regional development and foster national integration. While economic reforms have no doubt caused hardship, the long-term benefits, as outlined, must be communicated with honesty, not propaganda.

“Afenifere appreciates the composure and statesmanship displayed by Akume. At a time of deepening socio-political anxieties, his intervention is both reassuring and necessary.

“We call on other senior public figures to emulate such candour, and for all Nigerians to prioritise national interest above sectional ambition.”

LP, NNPP speak

The National Publicity Secretary of the New Nigeria People’s Party, Ladipo Johnson, warned against barring northern candidates from contesting the 2027 presidential election.

Johnson said if President Tinubu could disrupt the delicate religious and ethnocentric political balance the country has been practising before 2023, nobody should grandstand with the rhetoric of fielding only a Southern candidate.

He said, “We had developed a culture where we felt two things were sacrosanct, which were Muslim-Christian or Christian-Muslim tickets, and the rotation from North to South.

“However, you will see that at the last election, the issue of a mixed ticket to keep some form of balance in the country was jettisoned.

“Today, we have a Muslim-Muslim ticket in governance, and the country hasn’t collapsed. So why would anyone think the country would collapse or go bad if the northern candidate wins in 2027?

“There must not be a restriction because when there was none regarding religious balance, why should there be a restriction regarding where the person comes from?”

The Deputy National Chairman of the Labour Party, Dr Ayo Olorunfemi, also shared his sentiment.

According to him, what Nigeria should be more concerned about is the competence and intellectual ability of the candidates, not the region.

See also  Voter register nears 100m ahead of 2027 polls

He said, “We have opened our doors for anybody who wants to contest, whether you are from the South or the West. It’s not all about zoning, but getting the right leader for Nigeria.

“So if the person is coming from the North or South, he is welcome. As far as we are concerned, there is no hard and fast rule about this. It’s about the people of Nigeria and our economy. It’s about security, health, technology, and a country we can truly call our own in terms of culture and values.

“Labour Party is determined to help Nigerians by bringing somebody, regardless of where he is coming from, who jas the capacity to turn this nation around.”

Babachir slams Akume

A former SGF, Babachir Lawal, said it would be foolhardy of the APC and ministers in Tinubu’s cabinet to ask the North to wait for 2031 before fielding a candidate for election.

Lawal said it would amount to mockery, knowing that Tinubu and the ruling party were the ones who broke the unwritten agreement on power rotation in the country when they introduced a Muslim-Muslim ticket into the political equation.

He queried, “Are competent people found only in the South? Is that what Akume and Tinubu are saying? Let me know if there is a document somewhere that says it is the turn of Southerners again.

“I don’t think it is written anywhere that you can’t truncate the tenure of a bad president just because he is from the South. If the APC fields a Southern candidate, that is their choice, not our own.

“We shouldn’t be talking about the APC. These are people who have no standard at all.

“How can somebody who fielded a Muslim-Muslim ticket, when the standard has not always been the same faith ticket, suddenly turn around and start demanding that a standard must be followed?

‘When he broke the implied understanding, why didn’t he say that before? Even in the military, it has always been Muslim-Christian or Christian-Muslim. Why is he now saying it’s the turn of the South? Even the Southerners are not comfortable with his government.

“I once told you in an interview that Tinubu and his people have opened Pandora’s box. Now, they can’t hold anybody to any standard. They can’t have their cake and eat it.”

APGA, PDP react

The All Progressives Grand Alliance threw its weight behind the call for the South to produce Nigeria’s President in 2027.

Speaking exclusively with The PUNCH, the National Publicity Secretary of APGA, Ejimofor Opara, said the party would prioritise the South when it was time to pick its presidential flagbearer.

He said, “It is the turn of the South to produce the president in 2027. We will certainly promote a southern candidate,” adding that “More importantly, the progressives will surely work together come 2027.”

He, however, made it clear that the party would have nothing to do with the ADC-led coalition being championed by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

“APGA is not part of any coalition of spent politicians. Their mission is unpatriotic. It is nothing about the people. Thus, we don’t consider them to be progressives by their very ideals,” he added.

See also  APC imposes two-week deadline for presidential, gov, NASS forms

But the Peoples Democratic Party maintained that Nigerians would ultimately decide Tinubu’s fate at the ballot box.

PDP spokesman, Debo Ologunagba, said: “By 2027, Nigerians will vote them out because they have failed—failed woefully. So, they won’t be there till 2031.”

With voices for and against a southern presidency growing louder, the Kaduna parley has set the stage for what promises to be an intense build-up to the 2027 elections — one that could redefine Nigeria’s delicate balance of power.

Kwankwaso under fire

A former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress, Yekini Nabena, faulted recent remarks by Kwankwaso concerning national development and project allocation.

In a statement released on Tuesday, Nabena dismissed Kwankwaso’s claims, insisting that no ethnic, religious, or regional sentiment could undermine the legitimacy of a Southern presidency.

He stressed that the South’s completing eight years in power was non-negotiable.

Kwankwaso, who contested the 2023 presidential election under the New Nigeria People’s Party, had accused the Federal Government of disproportionately favouring the South in project distribution, citing poor road infrastructure in the North and a concentration of development in the South.

However, the Presidency refuted his claims by releasing a list of projects, which showed that President Bola Tinubu’s administration had allocated more funds to northern projects than those in the South.

Also responding to Kwankwaso, Nabena alleged that “the former governor’s real intention was to incite the northerners against the current administration and the re-election of a southerner in 2027 to complete eight years of a Southern presidency in the seat of power.”

The APC chieftain said such incitement for “a political business or negotiation, like some politicians did in 2019 and 2023, could no longer work because the people now know the real intention.

“The Kano voters now know who is using them for political business, and even the political gladiators now understand the tactics of political merchants.

“Is the North inferior or superior to the South after eight years of the North in the helm of affairs of Nigeria?

“Why is Senator Kwankwaso still complaining of underdevelopment in the North when the region has just completed its eight years?

“One will also wonder which of the northern money or resources was used to develop the South? Is it the gold, rice, or groundnut pyramid?

“As a politician, we all understand what the former governor is up to. He is working hard to incite the North against the Southern presidency, but that has failed woefully because the South must complete the eight years in the presidency for fairness and equity.”

The former APC spokesperson firmly stated that Kwankwaso lacked both the ability and influence to intimidate the South ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“You cannot intimidate the South or anybody with Kano votes any longer because, as politicians, we all know the game and what you are up to.

“The era of playing religious or ethnic cards is becoming far unfashionable,” Nabena warned.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Audit 2023 election before 2027 polls, Ondo PDP candidate urges INEC

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party candidate for Akure North/Akure South Federal Constituency in Ondo State, Babatunde Faro, has urged the Independent National Electoral Commission to audit the 2023 election and address reported failures ahead of the 2027 general election.

Faro made the call while speaking with journalists in Akure, the state capital, on Tuesday, saying INEC needed to improve its performance and ensure that voters’ choices were respected.

He cited problems with the commission’s electronic results viewing portal, IReV, and the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System during the 2023 general election.‎

“We don’t pray for what happened during the last presidential election to happen. When IREV stopped working, BVAS was not working, and we had a lot of chaos.

‎“I hope by now INEC shall have done an audit of the last election and corrected every error that we noticed. We might not be able to have a 100 per cent perfect election, but if we can have something in the range of 95, we’ll have said we’ve done well,” he said.

‎The PDP candidate also urged INEC to comply with relevant provisions of the Electoral Act on the publication of the electronic register of voters, expressing hope that outstanding issues would be addressed before the next general election.

Speaking on his plans for the constituency, Faro promised open, transparent and accountable representation if elected to the House of Representatives.

He said his priorities would include empowering youths and women, providing a platform for constituents to express their concerns and attracting federal government projects and infrastructure to Akure North and Akure South.

See also  Senate confirms Amupitan as INEC chairman

“That is what Akure will get: open, transparent, accessible representation at the National Assembly if I’m elected,” he said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

PANDEF reveals “We’ve not endorsed any presidential candidate”

Published

on

The Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) on Tuesday declared that it has not declared support for any presidential candidate for the 2027 general election, urging voters in the South-South to choose leaders based on their capacity to advance the interests of the Niger Delta.

The forum said it remained non-partisan and was not aligned with any political party or presidential candidate.

The National Chairman of PANDEF, Amb Godknows Igali, stated this while addressing journalists after a meeting of the organisation attended by former governors, former ministers, traditional rulers and other stakeholders from the six South-South states.

Igali urged the people of the region to scrutinise candidates and vote according to their conscience, stressing that their choices should reflect the development needs of the Niger Delta and the country.

He said, “PANDEF is non-partisan and not supporting any candidate. It is not a political party or support group.

We, therefore, call on the people of the South-South to exercise their civic responsibilities peacefully and vote according to their conscience, choosing candidates at all levels whose programmes, commitments, and demonstrated capacity align with the aspirations of the Niger Delta.

“I repeat, we call on the people of South-South to exercise their civic responsibility peacefully and vote according to their conscience.

“We call on our people to ‘shine your eyes’ and vote according to their conscience. They should look at candidates who have the capacity to help us as a region and move this country forward.”

The PANDEF chairman also urged Niger Delta indigenes holding public offices, particularly at the Federal Government level, to demonstrate greater commitment to the organisation’s activities.

“PANDEF calls on sons and daughters of the Niger Delta who are holding public office, especially at the level of the Federal Government, to show more commitment and interest in the activities of the organisation that are focused on uniting our people and advancing the cause of the Niger Delta.”

See also  You must first become presidential candidate before debating with me – Peter Obi knocks Umahi

Also speaking, former Governor Victor Attah, who is also the Chairman of PANDEF’s Board of Trustees, said the organisation had not endorsed any candidate for the presidential election.

“We are not aligning ourselves with any candidate. PANDEF has remained entirely neutral and non-partisan.

“As far as we are concerned, we have stated very clearly that the people of the South-South should shine their eyes and vote for whomever they believe would do their best for the Niger Delta region and the country,” he said.

This comes as political parties and presidential candidates intensify preparations for the 2027 general election.

Beyond the election, PANDEF renewed its demand for a substantial increase in the derivation allocation to oil-producing states, calling on the Federal Government to raise the current minimum of 13 per cent to 50 per cent.

Igali said the proposed increase would help address environmental pollution, infrastructure deficits and other development challenges confronting communities in the oil-producing region.

He also called for the abolition of the onshore-offshore dichotomy in revenue allocation, arguing that oil-producing communities should receive a fairer share of the resources extracted from their environment.

The PANDEF brings together political leaders, traditional rulers and other stakeholders from Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo and Rivers states to promote the interests of the Niger Delta.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Politics

Court orders INEC to replace NDC candidate with primary winner

Published

on

A Federal High Court in Lagos has nullified the (INEC) Independent National Electoral Commission’s publication of Ibrahim Lukman as the Nigeria Democratic Congress candidate for Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency I in the 2027 general election, The PUNCH reports.

In a judgment delivered on October 20, Justice Akintayo Aluko ruled that Lukman did not participate in the party’s primary election and held that INEC acted in breach of the Electoral Act 2026 by publishing Lukman’s name despite monitoring the May 29 primary at which Olumuyiwa Owadara emerged winner.

The court subsequently ordered the commission to publish the name of the winner, Owadara.

The court set aside INEC’s August 1 publication of Lukman as the party’s candidate and ordered the commission to immediately publish Owadara’s name and particulars. It also awarded N1m in costs against INEC and Lukman.

The judgment turned on INEC’s own monitoring report, which the court said showed that Owadara “scored the highest number of lawful votes cast” at the primary.

The NDC also told the court that it conducted no other primary for the constituency and that Lukman did not participate in the exercise.

Despite this, INEC published Lukman’s name and particulars as the party’s candidate, leaving Owadara off the list.
Owadara told the court that he had completed his nomination forms and had them submitted to the commission.

INEC argued that it published the names uploaded to its platform by political parties, including the NDC. Justice Aluko rejected that explanation, saying it was not supported by credible evidence.

“I am of the view that the evidence of the 1st Defendant that the names it published are the names uploaded on its platform by political parties including the 2nd Defendant is not supported or corroborated by any credible evidence,” the judge held.

See also  Ex-CDS Musa meets Tinubu as Irabor dismisses B’Haram recruitment claim

The court further recorded that the NDC denied sending Lukman’s name to INEC and accused the commission of imposing him on the party, a power it said the electoral umpire did not possess under the law.

Justice Aluko held that because Lukman had not participated in the primary, INEC had no lawful basis to publish him as the party’s candidate.

“The commission has no lawful basis or justification to publish the name and particulars of the 3rd Defendant as the candidate of the 2nd Defendant for the said election,” the judge said.

He ruled that the publication amounted to “non-compliance with and brutal violation of” Sections 29(1), 32(1) and 84(1) of the Electoral Act 2026, which govern the submission of candidates emerging from valid primaries and the commission’s monitoring of party primaries.

The court also found no credible evidence that the NDC had invoked the statutory process for changing its candidate under Section 33 of the Act or conducted another primary.

“There is no credible evidence before the court to suggest that the 2nd Defendant as a political party took steps to change its candidate in line with the provision of section 33 of the Electoral Act or that another primary election was held by the 2nd Defendant,” Justice Aluko held.

He concluded that Owadara had established his case with credible evidence, adding that the primary was conducted in accordance with the party’s guidelines and constitution and the Electoral Act.

“It is my humble but firm conviction that the plaintiff has established by credible evidence that the primary election was conducted in consonance with the guidelines, constitution of the 2nd defendant and the Electoral Act and that the plaintiff emerged the winner,” he said.

The judge added that INEC’s publication of Lukman’s name “is in violent breach of the Guidelines, the Constitution of the 2nd Defendant and the relevant provisions of the Electoral Act.”

See also  You must first become presidential candidate before debating with me – Peter Obi knocks Umahi

In reaching his decision, Justice Aluko relied on the Supreme Court’s ruling in Igboke v. Chukwu (2023), which set aside INEC’s publication of a candidate who had not won the relevant party primary.

Lukman had challenged the court’s jurisdiction, asking that the suit be struck out on the grounds that he was not properly served with the originating summons. He claimed he was in London when service was purportedly effected and denied that the WhatsApp number and email address used belonged to him.

The court dismissed the objection, noting that it had authorised substituted service on August 19 after the bailiff failed to serve Lukman personally. The bailiff’s affidavit stated that the processes were subsequently served through WhatsApp on August 24.

Justice Aluko found that the number used for service was the same one Lukman supplied to INEC in his Form EC9, an affidavit of personal particulars sworn to on June 27 and tendered by Owadara.

“There is, however, credible evidence before the court to demonstrate that the 3rd Defendant is not truthful after all,” the judge said.

The court also considered WhatsApp exchanges between the lawyers to Owadara and Lukman, which it said showed that court processes were exchanged on August 27, 28 and 31. Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Saleh v. Abah, the judge held that service on a party’s counsel who did not deny receiving the processes was valid.

The judge further noted that Lukman filed no counter-affidavit or defence to the originating summons and had therefore “failed to controvert or deny the claims and case of the Plaintiff”.

Owadara’s legal team was led by Festus Ogun, Managing Partner of FOLEGAL, with Tofunmi Adetunji and Omobola Olayanju. Ogun said the judgment had affirmed the judiciary’s role in upholding the law.

See also  FG suspends planned 15% import duty on PMS, diesel

“We are most relieved that the court has demonstrated once again that it remains an impartial institution of trust which dispenses justice without fear or favour,” he told The PUNCH on Tuesday evening.

He said the team had been confident in its legal argument against the publication of a candidate who did not participate in the recognised primary.

“The last-minute announcement of an individual who never participated in the recognised primary election as a candidate is a stain on the process and institutions manning the election and a grave injustice against the legitimate winner, which should not be allowed to stand,” Ogun said.

“We are happy the court agreed with us and ordered INEC to substitute the name for our client. This is a victory for democracy”

The NDC, through its counsel, Ikechukwu Onodi, argued that INEC lacked the power to substitute a validly nominated candidate, maintaining that substitution was an internal party matter subject to statutory conditions. He also argued that the commission’s role in primaries was limited to monitoring the exercise and seeking clarification where necessary.

INEC’s counsel, Segun Bello, argued that determining whom a political party sponsors was not the commission’s responsibility and that INEC was required to remain neutral.

On October 23, FOLEGAL wrote to the INEC National Chairman, enclosing a certified true copy of the judgment and requesting immediate compliance with the orders.

“We respectfully anticipate your earnest compliance with the said Orders of the Court,” the letter signed by Ogun stated.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

WHATSAPP CHANNEL

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending