Connect with us

Business

Capital projects crumble as states cut spending

Published

on

Procurement delays, worsening insecurity, and rising costs of goods and services have emerged as major reasons several state governments failed to meet their capital expenditure targets in the first six months of 2025.

Findings from states’ second-quarter Budget Implementation Reports revealed that capital spending across many states remained significantly below expectations, despite ambitious budgetary provisions designed to accelerate infrastructure growth.

A fresh breakdown of state government expenditure between January and June 2025 showed that 31 states collectively disbursed N2.75tn for capital projects.

However, this figure represents only a fraction of the N17.51tn they had budgeted for capital expenditure in the 2025 fiscal year.

The budget performance of those figures is about 15.7 per cent, meaning the 31 states achieved less than one-fifth of their capital expenditure target in the first half of 2025.

The underperformance has delayed critical infrastructure projects and deepened hardship for citizens who rely on improved roads, schools, hospitals, and water systems.

This is also coming on the heels of the fact that the states earmarked N11.34tn to finance capital projects but eventually recorded a funding gap of N3.98tn in 2024, as revenue shortfalls, rising wage bills, and heavy debt servicing weakened their fiscal capacity.

This year’s half-year performance suggests that the same structural challenges remain unresolved.

According to experts, capital spending is the fund disbursed by the state on long-term investments aimed at improving infrastructure, services, or the economy.

These expenditures are typically used for projects that have a lasting benefit, such as building roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, public transport systems, and other essential infrastructure to foster economic growth, improve quality of life, and ensure better public services for citizens.

The clamour for improved infrastructure has grown louder in the aftermath of the fuel subsidy removal and foreign exchange devaluation, which have significantly boosted revenue inflows to the federal, state, and local governments, raising public expectations for visible development outcomes.

Last month, President Bola Tinubu urged state governors to prioritise Nigerians’ welfare by investing more in their future, putting more money into rural electrification, agricultural mechanisation, poverty eradication, and improved infrastructure investment.

Tinubu implored the governors to do more to positively impact the lives of Nigerians in the grassroots, saying, “I want to appeal to you; let us change the story of our people in the rural areas.

“The economy is working. We are on the path of recovery, but we need to stimulate growth in the rural areas. We know the situation in the rural areas, let us collaborate and do what will benefit the people,” he added.

President Tinubu urged state governors to collaborate with the Federal Government to drive economic development in rural areas nationwide. “We have to embrace mechanisation in agriculture, fight insecurity, and improve school enrolment through feeding,” the President said.

Despite the revenue windfall, many states have failed to meet their mandate of delivering key infrastructure for citizens, with governors attributing the shortfall to persistent insecurity, cumbersome procurement processes, and other long-standing challenges.

An analysis of the fiscal performance of each state, utilising data from the Q1 to Q2 budget performance reports obtained from each state’s website, revealed the scale of the challenges.

See also  Nationwide blackout looms as electricity workers down tools

The breakdown showed sharp contrasts in budget performance across the country, with 31 states collectively spending N2.75tn on capital projects and N2.35tn on recurrent expenditure between January and June 2025.

An analysis of states’ second-quarter Budget Implementation Reports revealed that while some states channelled the bulk of their resources into infrastructure and development projects, others leaned heavily on recurrent costs such as salaries, allowances, and overheads.

Enugu State recorded the highest capital-to-recurrent ratio, with 81.9 per cent of its total expenditure (N99.59bn) going into capital projects, compared to N22.06bn for recuThe 27.1 per cent performance is indeed), Bayelsa (69 per cent), and Kebbi (68 per cent) followed closely, ranking among the most capital-focused states in the first half of the year.

Imo State led the pack on infrastructure development with N188.1bn channelled into capital expenditure, compared to just N50.29bn on recurrent. Enugu followed closely, committing N99.59bn to capital projects against N22.06bn for recurrent, making it the most capital-focused state in terms of percentage allocation.

Bayelsa also posted a strong capital bias, spending N238.29bn on capital against N107.26bn recurrent, while Abia disbursed N133.1bn on capital compared to N39.73bn recurrent. Edo and Akwa Ibom both crossed the N170bn mark in capital expenditure, allocating N179.56bn and N179.76bn respectively.

Other states that leaned more towards capital included Borno (N92.99bn vs N61.59bn recurrent), Gombe (N93.99bn vs N52.25bn), Jigawa (N82.99bn vs N56.63bn), Kebbi (N78.86bn vs N36.81bn) and Zamfara (N51.1bn vs N37.57bn).

At the other extreme, several states recorded higher recurrent spending than capital, raising concerns about long-term development priorities. Kogi was the most recurrent-heavy, spending N133.22bn on recurrent compared to N73.16bn on capital.

Ekiti followed, with N101.1bn on recurrent against N56.1bn capital, while Osun allocated N89.37bn to recurrent and only N57.13bn to capital. Oyo also tilted towards consumption, disbursing N129.06bn recurrent against N110.64bn for capital projects.

Ogun balanced closely, spending N157.15bn on recurrent and N155.64bn on capital. Similarly, Bauchi (N97.29bn recurrent vs N91.69bn capital), Kano (N115.24bn recurrent vs N90.79bn capital), Kwara (N71.59bn recurrent vs N62.68bn capital), Nasarawa (N68.3bn recurrent vs N48.49bn capital), Ondo (N84.37bn recurrent vs N61.88bn capital), Sokoto (N72.18bn recurrent vs N69.01bn capital) and Taraba (N57.88bn recurrent vs N24.17bn capital) all leaned more towards recurrent expenditure.

A few states maintained near parity between the two categories. Kaduna disbursed N108.45bn on capital and N100.31bn recurrent, while Ebonyi’s spending was almost evenly split at N36.89bn capital and N38.38bn recurrent.

The overall capital share of 53.9 per cent across the 31 states indicates that subnationals are still devoting nearly half of their budgets to recurrent obligations, despite revenue windfalls from subsidy removal and foreign exchange reforms.

The poor performance has tangible effects. In Benue, where only N23.32bn was spent on capital projects compared to N44.5bn on recurrent, key roads and agricultural projects have stalled due to insecurity. Similarly, Cross River allocated just N30.53bn for capital against N84.8bn for recurrent, limiting its capacity to address infrastructural deficits in education and healthcare.

See also  Ezekwesili slams N’Assembly’s constitutional amendment as charade

Commenting on this, Governor Hyacinth Alia of Benue State blamed the state’s poor performance on widespread insecurity.

“The poor recorded performance is largely due to the overwhelming insecurity challenges faced by the state during this reporting period,” the budget report said.

In June, no fewer than 200 people were killed when gunmen attacked Yelwata community in Guma Local Government Area of Benue State.

Although the state raised its 2025 capital budget by over N100bn to stimulate “aggressive urban and rural infrastructural development,” authorities admitted that implementation, particularly in the second quarter, “was significantly slowed down” as contractors were unable to mobilise.

Jigawa State also struggled, with officials describing capital performance as “below average.”

According to the report, “Procurement plans of most capital-intensive projects of most MDAs primarily target beyond the first quarter, which are to ensure providing adequate time to deal with all the necessary contract procedures. During the second quarter, many of these projects entered the implementation phase, with several undergoing tender approvals and vetting processes.”

The government, however, expressed optimism that performance “will improve significantly by the third quarter.”

Imo State reported capital expenditure performance of just 27.1 per cent as against the expected 50 per cent by mid-year.

“The 27.1 per cent performance is indeed much less than expected, however capital expenditure does not strictly follow that format of equally splitting the total amount across the four quarters,” the government said.

It cited recent funding gap analysis in primary education and health that slowed releases, coupled with insurgency in parts of the state.

“The current spate of insurgency in and around the state has also affected the mobilisation of contractors whose procurement processes have been completed to commence work,” the report noted.

Borno State attributed its weak capital performance to “low capital inflows from budgeted sources and other peculiarities of the state.”

The government disclosed that an amendment was made in the revised 2025 budget “to cater for overspending on both recurrent and capital expenditure in Q1 and Q2.”

In Ebonyi, officials said capital budget utilisation stood at just 11.3 per cent.

“The relatively low performance is primarily attributed to the budget profiling approach, which scheduled the implementation of several large-scale capital projects for the third quarter and beyond,” the report stated.

Authorities added that some expenditures in health and education were not captured in the approved budget.

“To address these issues, the state plans to undertake a budget review in the third quarter to incorporate these expenditures and realign budget provisions to support timely and efficient project execution,” the report added.

In Sokoto State, capital performance stood at 19.7 per cent as of Q2, which government admitted was “below expectations.”

“This is largely due to the procurement process attached to capital projects that takes time as well as slow performance on the part of some contractors,” the budget report said.

They added that the government had set up a Projects Monitoring Committee “to change the trend in subsequent quarters.”

Yobe blamed delays in approvals and soaring costs for its underwhelming execution.

See also  Mathematics no longer compulsory for Arts students, says FG

“Delays in the commencement of certain key projects, particularly those that required memo approvals, were primarily due to bureaucratic bottlenecks,” the report stated.

The government, however, noted progress in road, market and flyover projects, but said external factors hurt delivery timelines.

“The rainy season and the general rising costs of goods and services significantly impacted the timelines for project execution,” it said.

Governor Abdullahi Sule of Nasarawa State pointed to front-loading difficulties typical of large infrastructure projects.

“This slow pace reflects the challenge common in infrastructure projects, where initial disbursements are slower as project planning, procurement, and mobilisation processes are finalised,” the government explained.

It admitted overspending in certain areas such as “purchase of motor vehicles, rehabilitation of equipment, and anniversaries/celebrations,” but pledged to correct this in its budget review.

Zamfara said its low capital performance was mainly because “many capital projects were still undergoing procurement processes.”

“Payments for mobilisations commenced in the second quarter, while disbursements for ongoing projects will mainly occur in the third quarter after achieving significant milestones,” the government noted.

In Kebbi State, officials blamed the decline in capital spending on the “gradual re-evaluation of all capital projects to ensure proper procurement practices are followed.”

The government also prioritised the payment of outstanding contract arrears.

“The State Government continues to prioritise major infrastructural projects while ensuring a keen focus on education, health and other social sectors,” the report said, adding that MDAs have been urged to “intensify fund requests for completion of projects.”

Adamawa reported capital expenditure of N52.4bn out of a N348.9bn allocation, representing just 15 per cent performance.

“While this performance may appear low, the state is making efforts to improve investment in long-term projects,” the government explained.

Across the board, state governments blamed insecurity, procurement delays, bureaucracy, weak capital inflows, and high project costs for their poor performance. While most expressed optimism that execution will improve in the third quarter, analysts warn that persistent underperformance in capital expenditure could stall infrastructure delivery and economic growth at the subnational level.

A Professor of Economics at Babcock University, Segun Ajibola, stated that the enduring problem of high governance expenses had persisted at the state level, with inadequate oversight and accountability resulting in minimal economic benefits for grassroots citizens.

Meanwhile, Nigeria’s 31 states spent a combined N2.36tn on recurrent expenditure between January and June 2025, surpassing by 18.3 per cent or N364bn, the N1.994tn governors personally racked up on refreshments, sitting allowances, travel and utilities in the first nine months of 2024.

A breakdown of the states’ recurrent bills, obtained from official budget performance reports, shows that Ogun (N157.15bn), Kogi (N133.22bn), Oyo (N129.06bn), Kano (N115.24bn) and Akwa Ibom (N113.44bn) topped the chart as the biggest recurrent spenders in the first half of this year.

On the other hand, Enugu (N22.06bn), Katsina (N26.39bn), Zamfara (N37.57bn), Ebonyi (N38.38bn) and Abia (N39.73bn) reported the lowest recurrent allocations in the period.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Investors lose fresh N1.17tn as bearish trading resumes

Published

on

The equities market began the week in the red as the All-Share Index of the Nigerian Exchange fell by 1.26 per cent to close at 145,159.77 points on Monday.

The decline wiped off about N1.17tn from investors’ wealth, dragging market capitalisation down to N92.3tn.

According to market data, the downturn was driven largely by heavy sell pressure on Dangote Cement, which fell by a maximum of 10 per cent, alongside declines in tier-1 banks including Zenith Bank (-1.64 per cent), Access Holdings (-3.26 per cent), and FBN Holdings (-2.76 per cent).

Despite the negative close, market breadth stood positive, with 28 gainers outperforming 24 losers. Sovereign Insurance (+9.97 per cent) led the gainers’ chart, while Dangote Cement and Enamelware, both down 10 per cent, topped the losers’ list.

Market activity normalised after last Friday’s unusually large turnover, driven by off-market crosses in Cornerstone Insurance. Total volume traded declined sharply by 92.1 per cent to 388.2 million units, while total value traded fell by 26.3 per cent to N31.1bn. Tantalizer emerged as the most traded stock by volume with 57.1 million units, while Aradel Holdings dominated the value chart with N21.5bn worth of trades, accounting for 69 per cent of total market value. Recall that Tantalizer on Friday announced the signing of a multi-million-dollar deal with a US-based firm for a period of five years to export premium prawns and shrimps.

Trading remained largely bearish across most sectors. The InHHHdustrial Goods Index led sector declines, down 4.48 per cent, primarily due to weakness in Dangote Cement.

The Oil & Gas Index fell by 1.18 per cent with losses in Oando and Aradel, while the Banking Index dropped 1.01 per cent. The Consumer Goods Index edged down 0.02 per cent. In contrast, the Insurance Index closed positively, rising 0.07 per cent, supported by gains in Sovereign Insurance.

See also  Nigerians battle shortage of cooking gas as price of 12.5kg cylinder of gas rises to N25,000

Cowry Asset Management, in its daily market note, attributed Monday’s downturn to profit-taking activities among investors. The firm noted that the drop in market capitalisation occurred despite the listing of 1.96 billion ordinary shares of Chams Holding via private placement, underscoring the depth of the sell pressure.

The investment house added that trading patterns reflected heightened retail activity. Although total trading volume plunged 92.64 per cent to 360.6 million units and value dropped 26.88 per cent to N30.9bn, the number of deals rose 15.83 per cent to 27,975, indicating increased participation through smaller-sized transactions.

Meanwhile, the October inflation data released by the National Bureau of Statistics indicated that Nigeria’s inflation continued its deceleration, moderating to 16.1 per cent year-on-year in October, compared with 18.0 per cent in the prior month.

This moderation was evident in the food and core baskets, which both settled at 13.1 per cent YoY and 18.7 per cent YoY, respectively (vs 16.9 per cent and 19.5 per cent in September). However, on a MoM basis, headline inflation rose by 0.9 per cent vs 0.7 per cent recorded in the prior period.

Continue Reading

Business

Minority investors vital for capital market growth – Sola Oni

Published

on

With more than 30 years of experience across financial journalism, capital market operations, education, and strategic communications, Sola Oni stands as a prominent figure in Nigeria’s investment landscape. A former spokesperson for the Nigerian Stock Exchange (now NGX) and a Fellow of both the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers and the Institute of Capital Market Registrars, Oni discusses with OLUWAKEMI ABIMBOLA the importance of minority investors in market growth and other emerging developments in Nigeria’s financial sector

The capital market has witnessed several developments recently, from the transition to a T+2 settlement cycle to the recognition of digital assets such as cryptocurrency. How do you assess these changes and their implications for the market and the wider economy?

The commencement of the Central Securities Clearing System operations on 14 April 1997, established a central depository with an electronic clearing and settlement system. It began with T+5 (Transaction Day plus five working days). In 2000, CSCS advanced to T+3, the settlement cycle it has maintained to date.

Before this milestone, the Nigerian capital market relied on a manual clearing and settlement system, which was entirely paper-based. Investors were issued physical share certificates as proof of ownership, a process fraught with numerous challenges. Clearing and settlement could take weeks or even months due to manual document verification. Registrars were required to authenticate share certificates, which were physically delivered for ownership transfer and register updates.

The manual process was susceptible to theft, administrative bottlenecks, high transaction costs, reconciliation errors, fraud, and forgery. As a dynamic institution, CSCS is now set to launch a T+2 clearing and settlement cycle on 28 November. All stakeholders are prepared for this historic event, which will be inaugurated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The ultimate goal is to achieve T+1, which is already the standard in several advanced markets. This means that if you buy or sell securities today, payment and ownership transfer will be completed the following day. Markets such as the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada, Bolsa Mexicana de Valores in Mexico, NSE and BSE in India, and the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges in China already operate this benchmark.

Let me add that T+0 is uncommon, as it requires real-time cash and securities availability. It can reduce liquidity since funds and securities are tied up immediately. Although a few markets, including China, the United States, and India, operate T+0, it is mostly limited to digital assets and certain money market instruments.

Many companies in the financial services sector are currently undergoing recapitalisation. How should minority investors position themselves to take advantage of this trend?

Minority investors, those owning less than 50 per cent of a company, are essential to every thriving capital market. Regardless of ownership size, every investor must begin with the basics: What is my investment objective? What is my risk tolerance? What is my time horizon? And what is my source of funds?

An investor who cannot answer these questions is simply taking uncalculated risks, which often end badly. As the financial services sector evolves, minority investors need to be strategic. A good starting point is understanding the investment policy of the target company and identifying growth segments with strong potential. These include undercapitalised mid-tier banks, emerging fintech firms, and high-performing insurance companies.

A minority investor’s objective should align closely with that of the target company. It is also prudent to focus on firms where recapitalisation can unlock regulatory reliefs, improve credit ratings, and strengthen growth capacity. Positioning in such companies enhances returns and provides a pathway to sustainable wealth creation. In a reform-driven and innovative market, the best opportunities often lie where growth and regulation converge in favour of investors.

See also  Ekiti poll: APC adopts consensus as Oyebanji’s rival withdraws

Tax reforms are expected to take effect next year. What impact might these have on the capital market?

The ongoing work of the Presidential Committee on Tax and Fiscal Policy Reforms, chaired by Mr Taiwo Oyedele, is generating significant interest across Nigeria’s economic landscape. Stakeholders believe that the committee’s recommendations will have far-reaching implications for businesses, investors, and the capital market as a whole.

In the capital market, taxation is a major determinant of competitiveness. It affects corporate earnings and, by extension, shareholder returns. For foreign investors, tax policy is often a critical factor in assessing a country’s investment appeal. Key taxes that directly affect investors include Capital Gains Tax, Withholding Tax on dividends, Transaction Taxes, and Stamp Duties.

However, there are growing concerns among market participants over the proposed increase in Capital Gains Tax from 10 per cent to 30 per cent, which could discourage high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and foreign portfolio investors. Analysts warn that such an increase might weaken market confidence and reduce overall investment inflows.

The capital market community therefore looks to the government to consider tax incentives and relief measures that can enhance Nigeria’s global competitiveness. Stakeholders continue to engage with Mr Oyedele and his team, seeking assurance that the reforms will foster growth while preserving investor confidence. Mr Oyedele has repeatedly emphasised that the reforms aim to promote fairness, transparency, and alignment with global best practices.

As the committee’s work progresses, we in the capital market are optimistic that the outcome will have a net positive impact, boosting investor sentiment and positioning Nigeria’s capital market for sustainable growth.

How would you assess Nigeria’s progress in developing a commodities exchange ecosystem?

Nigeria’s commodities exchange ecosystem is still largely untapped but brimming with potential. Encouragingly, awareness of the benefits of commodities exchanges is growing, driven primarily by private-sector-led initiatives.

For instance, in September, the Lagos Commodities and Futures Exchange listed N23.4bn worth of Eko Rice Classic Spot Contracts, a milestone in transforming Nigeria’s agricultural and commodities sectors.
One major source of optimism is the new Investment and Securities Act (2025), which has addressed previous policy gaps and formalised the country’s commodities ecosystem. The Act has strong potential to stimulate economic growth if effectively implemented.

Nonetheless, stronger regulatory support is needed. The government should consider making it mandatory for commodity producers and exporters to use exchange platforms. This would have a multiplier effect on GDP growth and boost foreign exchange earnings. It should also create an enabling environment for private-led commodities exchanges by supporting warehousing and logistics infrastructure to reduce post-harvest losses and enhance token and receipt delivery.

With the number of minority investors on the rise, how crucial is investor education in sustaining market growth and promoting economic resilience?

Minority investors, those owning less than 50 per cent of a company’s shares, are key stakeholders in Nigeria’s capital market. Their protection and active participation are vital for building investor confidence and ensuring fair corporate governance.

See also  CNG price hits N450/SCM as FG withdraws subsidies

Under the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020, SEC rules, and NGX listing requirements, minority investors are entitled to several rights that protect their interests and promote accountability.

They have the right to information, ensuring access to periodic financial statements, annual reports, and corporate disclosures, as well as rights to dividends, entry and exit, and protection from oppressive conduct by majority shareholders or directors. They can attend and vote at annual and extraordinary general meetings and participate in rights issues and bonus share offers, thereby preventing unfair dilution of their holdings. In cases of dispute, they can seek legal redress, including court petitions under CAMA for oppression, mismanagement, or unfair prejudice.

These provisions reflect the joint efforts of the SEC, NGX, and the Corporate Affairs Commission to promote transparency and investor protection. When listed companies respect these rights, they strengthen corporate reputation, improve liquidity, and attract both domestic and foreign investors.

Beyond rights, minority investors serve as critical checks and balances on boards and management. Through constructive engagement, asking questions, demanding accountability, and scrutinising decisions, they help uphold governance standards. Their participation in public offers, rights issues, and private placements also deepens liquidity and supports capital formation, which ultimately strengthens the economy.
Protecting minority investors is therefore not merely a legal duty but a strategic necessity for market growth.

A transparent, equitable system that safeguards all investors will enhance confidence and position Nigeria’s capital market as a globally competitive investment destination.
How do you envision Nigeria’s capital market evolving over the next five years?

Capital market development is a marathon, not a sprint. Over the next five years, I envision a market shaped by technology, innovation, and broader participation, particularly from millennials, Gen Z, and other digital natives.
The rise of digital platforms and the introduction of innovative investment products are likely to attract tech-savvy investors, expanding market reach and liquidity. More companies are expected to tap into the capital market for long-term funding, while the government may increasingly rely on market instruments to finance infrastructure projects.

With the CSCS set to commence T+2 settlement this month, the market will become more efficient and competitive in transaction processing.

We can also anticipate significant growth in the commodities ecosystem, with private-sector-led exchanges contributing to GDP expansion and boosting the global competitiveness of Nigerian agricultural products. The Over-the-Counter Exchange, led by NASD Plc, is also poised for increased activity as new products and strategies attract retail and institutional investors.

However, these projections depend on key factors such as the faithful execution of economic reforms, adoption of emerging technologies, and full implementation of the SEC’s Capital Market Master Plan and ISA 2025. With these in place, Nigeria’s capital market could evolve into a more inclusive, innovative, and globally competitive environment.

You began your career in journalism before transitioning into capital market operations and corporate communications. How did that journey unfold?

My transition into the capital market began in 1992 when my editor at The Guardian, Mr Jide Ogundele, sent me to the library to study the Financial Times of London for two days. Until then, I had covered multiple beats, Energy, Money Market, Aviation, Insurance, and Manufacturing, often producing front-page news.

At The Guardian, excellence was non-negotiable. Readers were largely middle-class and above, so one had to be exceptional in both reporting and writing to keep the job.

See also  PDP convenes emergency meeting after court halts convention

My first visit to the Nigerian Stock Exchange (now NGX) in 1992 was fascinating. Journalists watched from the gallery as stockbrokers shouted bids and offers on the trading floor, a system known as the Call-Over or Open Outcry. It was a vibrant, disciplined environment where trading, price discovery, and share allocation were meticulously coordinated.

After each session, journalists compared the Exchange’s Daily Official List with their records to ensure accuracy. Our reports influenced broker decisions, sparked debate, and even moved share prices, a reflection of how much the market depended on credible reporting.

Although the Call-Over System was engaging, it was also time-consuming and dependent on the Chairman’s discretion. Covering the capital market was demanding because it required understanding the broader economy, how macroeconomic variables influenced company performance and stock prices.

In 1994, I was briefly de-accredited by The Exchange, but The Guardian stood by me. By 1997, I joined The Exchange itself, and that same year, I won the Diamond Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting. I rose to management level, led a department, and contributed significantly to the organisation’s growth.

The Exchange invested in my training, I studied at the New York Institute of Finance, trained at the U.S. SEC’s International Institute for Securities Market Development in Washington D.C., and interned at the World Bank in Chicago.

Today, I am a Fellow of both the Institute of Capital Market Registrars and the Chartered Institute of Stockbrokers, as well as a member of the Commodities Brokers Association of Nigeria and the Chartered Institute for Securities and Investment, UK.

I currently work as a public relations consultant, integrated communications strategist, and educationist, maintaining strong ties to the capital market. Journalism laid the foundation for my understanding of finance, governance, and market dynamics, skills that have shaped my entire professional journey.

If you could advise regulators and listed companies on one mindset shift, what would it be?

Both the apex regulator (SEC) and self-regulatory organisations play a crucial role in enforcing market rules and protecting investors. With rapid technological change, regulatory frameworks must evolve accordingly.

The Investment and Securities Act should be reviewed periodically to ensure that regulators stay ahead of market operators, addressing potential infractions before they escalate. Likewise, listed companies must strictly comply with post-listing requirements to maintain transparency and investor trust.

Ultimately, market growth depends on trust. Regulators and operators share responsibility for building and maintaining this trust. Regulators must enforce rules consistently, while operators, brokers, listed firms, and other participants, must act with integrity and provide accurate, timely information.

When investors are confident that the market is fair, transparent, and responsive, they are more willing to commit capital, which in turn fuels liquidity, growth, and long-term stability.

Looking back, what achievement are you most proud of in your capital market journey?

I have consistently advocated for policy reforms, highlighted structural and fiscal challenges, and promoted greater participation in the capital market through my writings and public commentary.

I am also passionate about mentoring the next generation of financial journalists, helping them to embrace accuracy, integrity, and professionalism. Through these efforts, I aim to encourage informed investing, strengthen governance, and contribute to building a more inclusive and resilient market ecosystem.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Lagos bond subscription hits N310bn

Published

on

The Lagos State Commissioner for Finance, Yomi Oluyomi, says the state has made history with the conclusion of the bookbuild for its landmark bond issuance that has recorded an overwhelming reception from the investment community.

In a statement on Monday, Oluyomi explained that the state offered a N200bn Conventional Bond and a N14.8bn Green Bond, both of which were significantly oversubscribed.

“The Conventional Bond, which is the largest ever issued by a non-corporate sub-national in Nigeria’s history, attracted subscriptions totalling N308bn, representing a 54 per cent oversubscription above the initial offer. Lagos State is the first sub-national government to issue an impact climate bond. The Green bond attracted N28.7bn – 94 per cent more than the target,” Oluyomi said.

The Lagos State Governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, was quoted in the statement as saying, ”This is a reflection of the global confidence in Nigeria’s economy, fostered by the bold reforms initiated by President Bola Tinubu as reflected in the recent oversubscription of the Federal Government’s Eurobond.

“In Lagos, ours is a testament to our resilience and the unwavering support of our private sector partners who believe in our vision of building Africa’s model megacity that is safe, secure, and functional,” Sanwo-Olu said.

According to him, the state shall continue to ensure prudent financial management, accountability, and fiscal transparency as it continues to provide a conducive environment for businesses to grow. “Our dream is to make Lagos a global financial hub; we will keep our eyes on the ball,” he added.

The statement pointed out that the proceeds from these Bonds are earmarked to fund critical projects across the state, directly aligned along the line of the THEMES+ Agenda of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu.

See also  CNG price hits N450/SCM as FG withdraws subsidies

“These projects will focus on vital areas such as transportation, healthcare, education, and environmental sustainability, all aimed at significantly improving the livelihood and well-being of all Lagosians and securing a more prosperous and resilient future for the state,” it stated.

The “conventional bond” is a fixed-rate, long-term debt instrument issued by the Lagos State Government to raise capital from the domestic capital market.

Proceeds are used to fund infrastructure and social development projects across Lagos. Lagos State has a Debt Issuance Programme that allows it to issue bonds, notes, and other securities under a shelf registration.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending