Connect with us

Business

Capital projects crumble as states cut spending

Published

on

Procurement delays, worsening insecurity, and rising costs of goods and services have emerged as major reasons several state governments failed to meet their capital expenditure targets in the first six months of 2025.

Findings from states’ second-quarter Budget Implementation Reports revealed that capital spending across many states remained significantly below expectations, despite ambitious budgetary provisions designed to accelerate infrastructure growth.

A fresh breakdown of state government expenditure between January and June 2025 showed that 31 states collectively disbursed N2.75tn for capital projects.

However, this figure represents only a fraction of the N17.51tn they had budgeted for capital expenditure in the 2025 fiscal year.

The budget performance of those figures is about 15.7 per cent, meaning the 31 states achieved less than one-fifth of their capital expenditure target in the first half of 2025.

The underperformance has delayed critical infrastructure projects and deepened hardship for citizens who rely on improved roads, schools, hospitals, and water systems.

This is also coming on the heels of the fact that the states earmarked N11.34tn to finance capital projects but eventually recorded a funding gap of N3.98tn in 2024, as revenue shortfalls, rising wage bills, and heavy debt servicing weakened their fiscal capacity.

This year’s half-year performance suggests that the same structural challenges remain unresolved.

According to experts, capital spending is the fund disbursed by the state on long-term investments aimed at improving infrastructure, services, or the economy.

These expenditures are typically used for projects that have a lasting benefit, such as building roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, public transport systems, and other essential infrastructure to foster economic growth, improve quality of life, and ensure better public services for citizens.

The clamour for improved infrastructure has grown louder in the aftermath of the fuel subsidy removal and foreign exchange devaluation, which have significantly boosted revenue inflows to the federal, state, and local governments, raising public expectations for visible development outcomes.

Last month, President Bola Tinubu urged state governors to prioritise Nigerians’ welfare by investing more in their future, putting more money into rural electrification, agricultural mechanisation, poverty eradication, and improved infrastructure investment.

Tinubu implored the governors to do more to positively impact the lives of Nigerians in the grassroots, saying, “I want to appeal to you; let us change the story of our people in the rural areas.

“The economy is working. We are on the path of recovery, but we need to stimulate growth in the rural areas. We know the situation in the rural areas, let us collaborate and do what will benefit the people,” he added.

President Tinubu urged state governors to collaborate with the Federal Government to drive economic development in rural areas nationwide. “We have to embrace mechanisation in agriculture, fight insecurity, and improve school enrolment through feeding,” the President said.

Despite the revenue windfall, many states have failed to meet their mandate of delivering key infrastructure for citizens, with governors attributing the shortfall to persistent insecurity, cumbersome procurement processes, and other long-standing challenges.

An analysis of the fiscal performance of each state, utilising data from the Q1 to Q2 budget performance reports obtained from each state’s website, revealed the scale of the challenges.

See also  ADC will go for presidential primary if consensus fails – Atiku

The breakdown showed sharp contrasts in budget performance across the country, with 31 states collectively spending N2.75tn on capital projects and N2.35tn on recurrent expenditure between January and June 2025.

An analysis of states’ second-quarter Budget Implementation Reports revealed that while some states channelled the bulk of their resources into infrastructure and development projects, others leaned heavily on recurrent costs such as salaries, allowances, and overheads.

Enugu State recorded the highest capital-to-recurrent ratio, with 81.9 per cent of its total expenditure (N99.59bn) going into capital projects, compared to N22.06bn for recuThe 27.1 per cent performance is indeed), Bayelsa (69 per cent), and Kebbi (68 per cent) followed closely, ranking among the most capital-focused states in the first half of the year.

Imo State led the pack on infrastructure development with N188.1bn channelled into capital expenditure, compared to just N50.29bn on recurrent. Enugu followed closely, committing N99.59bn to capital projects against N22.06bn for recurrent, making it the most capital-focused state in terms of percentage allocation.

Bayelsa also posted a strong capital bias, spending N238.29bn on capital against N107.26bn recurrent, while Abia disbursed N133.1bn on capital compared to N39.73bn recurrent. Edo and Akwa Ibom both crossed the N170bn mark in capital expenditure, allocating N179.56bn and N179.76bn respectively.

Other states that leaned more towards capital included Borno (N92.99bn vs N61.59bn recurrent), Gombe (N93.99bn vs N52.25bn), Jigawa (N82.99bn vs N56.63bn), Kebbi (N78.86bn vs N36.81bn) and Zamfara (N51.1bn vs N37.57bn).

At the other extreme, several states recorded higher recurrent spending than capital, raising concerns about long-term development priorities. Kogi was the most recurrent-heavy, spending N133.22bn on recurrent compared to N73.16bn on capital.

Ekiti followed, with N101.1bn on recurrent against N56.1bn capital, while Osun allocated N89.37bn to recurrent and only N57.13bn to capital. Oyo also tilted towards consumption, disbursing N129.06bn recurrent against N110.64bn for capital projects.

Ogun balanced closely, spending N157.15bn on recurrent and N155.64bn on capital. Similarly, Bauchi (N97.29bn recurrent vs N91.69bn capital), Kano (N115.24bn recurrent vs N90.79bn capital), Kwara (N71.59bn recurrent vs N62.68bn capital), Nasarawa (N68.3bn recurrent vs N48.49bn capital), Ondo (N84.37bn recurrent vs N61.88bn capital), Sokoto (N72.18bn recurrent vs N69.01bn capital) and Taraba (N57.88bn recurrent vs N24.17bn capital) all leaned more towards recurrent expenditure.

A few states maintained near parity between the two categories. Kaduna disbursed N108.45bn on capital and N100.31bn recurrent, while Ebonyi’s spending was almost evenly split at N36.89bn capital and N38.38bn recurrent.

The overall capital share of 53.9 per cent across the 31 states indicates that subnationals are still devoting nearly half of their budgets to recurrent obligations, despite revenue windfalls from subsidy removal and foreign exchange reforms.

The poor performance has tangible effects. In Benue, where only N23.32bn was spent on capital projects compared to N44.5bn on recurrent, key roads and agricultural projects have stalled due to insecurity. Similarly, Cross River allocated just N30.53bn for capital against N84.8bn for recurrent, limiting its capacity to address infrastructural deficits in education and healthcare.

See also  FG to invest N12bn in digital research projects — Minister

Commenting on this, Governor Hyacinth Alia of Benue State blamed the state’s poor performance on widespread insecurity.

“The poor recorded performance is largely due to the overwhelming insecurity challenges faced by the state during this reporting period,” the budget report said.

In June, no fewer than 200 people were killed when gunmen attacked Yelwata community in Guma Local Government Area of Benue State.

Although the state raised its 2025 capital budget by over N100bn to stimulate “aggressive urban and rural infrastructural development,” authorities admitted that implementation, particularly in the second quarter, “was significantly slowed down” as contractors were unable to mobilise.

Jigawa State also struggled, with officials describing capital performance as “below average.”

According to the report, “Procurement plans of most capital-intensive projects of most MDAs primarily target beyond the first quarter, which are to ensure providing adequate time to deal with all the necessary contract procedures. During the second quarter, many of these projects entered the implementation phase, with several undergoing tender approvals and vetting processes.”

The government, however, expressed optimism that performance “will improve significantly by the third quarter.”

Imo State reported capital expenditure performance of just 27.1 per cent as against the expected 50 per cent by mid-year.

“The 27.1 per cent performance is indeed much less than expected, however capital expenditure does not strictly follow that format of equally splitting the total amount across the four quarters,” the government said.

It cited recent funding gap analysis in primary education and health that slowed releases, coupled with insurgency in parts of the state.

“The current spate of insurgency in and around the state has also affected the mobilisation of contractors whose procurement processes have been completed to commence work,” the report noted.

Borno State attributed its weak capital performance to “low capital inflows from budgeted sources and other peculiarities of the state.”

The government disclosed that an amendment was made in the revised 2025 budget “to cater for overspending on both recurrent and capital expenditure in Q1 and Q2.”

In Ebonyi, officials said capital budget utilisation stood at just 11.3 per cent.

“The relatively low performance is primarily attributed to the budget profiling approach, which scheduled the implementation of several large-scale capital projects for the third quarter and beyond,” the report stated.

Authorities added that some expenditures in health and education were not captured in the approved budget.

“To address these issues, the state plans to undertake a budget review in the third quarter to incorporate these expenditures and realign budget provisions to support timely and efficient project execution,” the report added.

In Sokoto State, capital performance stood at 19.7 per cent as of Q2, which government admitted was “below expectations.”

“This is largely due to the procurement process attached to capital projects that takes time as well as slow performance on the part of some contractors,” the budget report said.

They added that the government had set up a Projects Monitoring Committee “to change the trend in subsequent quarters.”

Yobe blamed delays in approvals and soaring costs for its underwhelming execution.

See also  Amotekun intercepts suspicious truck in Ondo, arrests 38 passengers

“Delays in the commencement of certain key projects, particularly those that required memo approvals, were primarily due to bureaucratic bottlenecks,” the report stated.

The government, however, noted progress in road, market and flyover projects, but said external factors hurt delivery timelines.

“The rainy season and the general rising costs of goods and services significantly impacted the timelines for project execution,” it said.

Governor Abdullahi Sule of Nasarawa State pointed to front-loading difficulties typical of large infrastructure projects.

“This slow pace reflects the challenge common in infrastructure projects, where initial disbursements are slower as project planning, procurement, and mobilisation processes are finalised,” the government explained.

It admitted overspending in certain areas such as “purchase of motor vehicles, rehabilitation of equipment, and anniversaries/celebrations,” but pledged to correct this in its budget review.

Zamfara said its low capital performance was mainly because “many capital projects were still undergoing procurement processes.”

“Payments for mobilisations commenced in the second quarter, while disbursements for ongoing projects will mainly occur in the third quarter after achieving significant milestones,” the government noted.

In Kebbi State, officials blamed the decline in capital spending on the “gradual re-evaluation of all capital projects to ensure proper procurement practices are followed.”

The government also prioritised the payment of outstanding contract arrears.

“The State Government continues to prioritise major infrastructural projects while ensuring a keen focus on education, health and other social sectors,” the report said, adding that MDAs have been urged to “intensify fund requests for completion of projects.”

Adamawa reported capital expenditure of N52.4bn out of a N348.9bn allocation, representing just 15 per cent performance.

“While this performance may appear low, the state is making efforts to improve investment in long-term projects,” the government explained.

Across the board, state governments blamed insecurity, procurement delays, bureaucracy, weak capital inflows, and high project costs for their poor performance. While most expressed optimism that execution will improve in the third quarter, analysts warn that persistent underperformance in capital expenditure could stall infrastructure delivery and economic growth at the subnational level.

A Professor of Economics at Babcock University, Segun Ajibola, stated that the enduring problem of high governance expenses had persisted at the state level, with inadequate oversight and accountability resulting in minimal economic benefits for grassroots citizens.

Meanwhile, Nigeria’s 31 states spent a combined N2.36tn on recurrent expenditure between January and June 2025, surpassing by 18.3 per cent or N364bn, the N1.994tn governors personally racked up on refreshments, sitting allowances, travel and utilities in the first nine months of 2024.

A breakdown of the states’ recurrent bills, obtained from official budget performance reports, shows that Ogun (N157.15bn), Kogi (N133.22bn), Oyo (N129.06bn), Kano (N115.24bn) and Akwa Ibom (N113.44bn) topped the chart as the biggest recurrent spenders in the first half of this year.

On the other hand, Enugu (N22.06bn), Katsina (N26.39bn), Zamfara (N37.57bn), Ebonyi (N38.38bn) and Abia (N39.73bn) reported the lowest recurrent allocations in the period.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Oil cargoes meant for naira-for-crude deal supplied to Dangote – NNPC

Published

on

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited has insisted that it supplied all available crude oil cargoes allocated under the Federal Government’s naira-for-crude initiative to the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, saying there had been no withholding on its part.

The national oil company stated this even as a top management official of the Dangote Group disclosed exclusively to The PUNCH that the refinery was receiving just four million barrels of crude oil monthly under the arrangement, instead of about 13 million barrels envisaged after President Bola Tinubu’s 2024 directive.

The refinery had attributed its decision to switch from naira-denominated fuel sales to dollar transactions to the crude supply shortfall, saying it would also increase exports of refined petroleum products to earn foreign exchange.

Responding on Monday, the NNPC, through its spokesman, Andy Odeh, said the company had fully discharged its obligations under the naira-for-crude policy. “As a 7.25 per cent equity shareholder in Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals, NNPC Limited has a direct and genuine interest in seeing the refinery operate at full capacity. That is not in dispute.

“What the figures being cited require is context. Under the naira-denominated crude supply arrangement, NNPC Limited has allocated 100 per cent of all available naira crude cargoes to DPRP in 2026 — there has been no withholding on our part. Actual off-take in any period is shaped by several variables: crude availability, nomination timelines, and the refinery’s own operational scheduling.

Odeh said the NNPC has met its obligations to the refinery, saying the two parties are resolving any existing gaps together. “NNPC Limited has met its 2026 supply obligations to the refinery. Our engagement with DPRP management remains constructive, and where any gaps exist, we are resolving them together — as the partners we are.

“A fully supplied, fully operational Dangote refinery serving the Nigerian market is an obligation NNPC Limited shares without reservation,” he added.

However, the Dangote Group maintained that the crude volumes supplied under the arrangement were inadequate to sustain naira-denominated fuel sales.

A top management official of the Dangote Group had told The PUNCH that crude supply under the naira-for-crude arrangement had been limited to just four million barrels monthly despite the increase in Nigeria’s crude oil production.

See also  FG generates N5.21tn from oil sales in H1

The official, who pleaded anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said the refinery was now set to export a larger percentage of its products in exchange for foreign exchange.

“Since the traders have brought lots of imported products to the market, we are focusing on exports. We can’t, and we shouldn’t be fighting against the government’s policies,” the source said.

Our correspondent told the official that exporting without adequately supplying the domestic market would not be good for the country, but he responded with a question: “Is issuing massive import licences and releasing forex for imports good for the country, when 45 per cent of our production can meet 100 per cent of the entire country’s requirements in terms of petrol, diesel and aviation fuel?”

When told that the NNPC said it had increased crude supply to the Dangote refinery, the official replied, “Do you think that they will keep quiet if we process the naira crude and export the products? We are getting just four million barrels monthly.”

With the sale of petrol in dollars to local marketers, the Dangote official disclosed that the refinery would now process whatever crude it receives under the naira arrangement and supply the equivalent refined products in naira to the Nigerian market through the NNPC.

“We will account for every barrel of crude we receive against the naira payment by supplying equivalent products in naira. We will do that through the NNPC. The NNPC buys a lot from us,” he said.

The refinery had maintained that the inability to secure the expected crude volumes under the naira-for-crude initiative compelled it to abandon naira-denominated fuel sales and adopt dollar pricing for petroleum products.

Last week, the refinery announced a new dollar-denominated pricing template, fixing the ex-depot price of petrol at $0.779 per litre, diesel at $1.087 per litre and aviation fuel at $0.942 per litre.

The move has drawn criticism from petroleum marketers, who warned that it could increase pressure on fuel prices, although the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority said the decision was consistent with the provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act, which allows refiners to recover their costs.

Supply worsens

Meanwhile, petrol supply in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, worsened on Monday with the closure of some major filling stations in Abuja and a fresh increase in the pump price of petrol.

See also  FG to invest N12bn in digital research projects — Minister

Checks by one of our correspondents showed that some stations operated by NNPC Limited and MRS along the Airport Road Expressway were shut when visited on Monday.

At stations that were dispensing the product, petrol was being sold at between N1,250 and N1,280 per litre. Bovas sold petrol at N1,250 per litre, while Azman Filling Station at 6th Avenue dispensed the product at N1,280 per litre. Salbas also sold petrol at N1,280 per litre.

The development has further heightened concerns among motorists and other consumers over the rising cost and availability of petrol in the nation’s capital. For motorists in Abuja, Monday’s development meant longer searches for petrol, closed stations and prices as high as N1,280 per litre at outlets that had the product available.

Meanwhile, truck traffic has surged across major private petroleum depots in Lagos as marketers scramble for petrol supplies following the fifth consecutive day of suspended loading at Dangote Petroleum Refinery amid growing expectations that wholesale prices could rise when operations resume.

Expert reacts

Meanwhile, Professor Emeritus of Petroleum Economics and Principal Facilitator at the FUPRE Energy Business School, Wumi Iledare, said the Dangote refinery’s decision to sell petrol in dollars should be viewed within the broader context of petroleum economics and Nigeria’s energy security rather than merely the currency in which products are priced.

According to Iledare, the move is a commercial response to the realities of the global oil market, where crude oil, the refinery’s major feedstock, is traded in United States dollars.

Iledare explained that pricing refined products in dollars enables the refinery to reduce its exposure to exchange rate volatility and provides greater revenue certainty, although it shifts part of the foreign exchange risk to fuel marketers and, ultimately, consumers, where the costs are passed on.

He stressed that the refinery’s dollar pricing would not automatically translate to higher fuel prices, noting that domestic petrol prices would instead become more closely tied to movements in international crude oil prices and the naira-dollar exchange rate.

“Does this necessarily mean higher fuel prices? Not necessarily. What it does mean is that domestic fuel prices become more closely linked to two key variables: international crude oil prices and the naira-dollar exchange rate. If crude prices rise or the naira weakens, pump prices are likely to increase. Conversely, if crude prices decline or the naira strengthens, consumers should also expect prices to adjust downward. That is how a market-oriented pricing system is expected to function,” he said.

See also  Food Price Cut: Why Nigerian farmers should not cultivate maize, rice – Tedheke

The petroleum expert maintained that despite concerns over dollar-denominated pricing, the Dangote refinery had strengthened Nigeria’s energy security by reducing dependence on imported petrol and improving the availability of petroleum products.

He, however, noted that domestic refining alone could not guarantee affordability, saying fuel prices would continue to depend on exchange rate stability, international crude prices, logistics costs and the level of competition in the downstream sector.

“The refinery has significantly improved the availability of petroleum products by reducing Nigeria’s dependence on imported PMS. That alone makes the country less vulnerable to disruptions in international supply chains and enhances supply reliability.

“This is why I would say that Dangote Refinery can shield Nigeria more effectively from supply shocks than from price shocks. Domestic refining improves energy security, but it cannot completely insulate Nigeria from global petroleum market dynamics because crude oil still has an international opportunity cost, whether it is refined in Lagos, Rotterdam, or Houston,” he stated.

On the implications for the naira, Iledare argued that pricing petroleum products in dollars would not automatically weaken the local currency. “As for the impact on the naira, the answer is more nuanced than many assume. Dollar pricing by itself does not automatically weaken the naira. What matters is whether the arrangement increases or reduces Nigeria’s net demand for foreign exchange,” he said.

He urged policymakers to focus less on the currency in which petroleum products are priced and more on building an efficient and competitive downstream market.

“The real issue is therefore not the currency of pricing. The real issue is whether Nigeria’s downstream petroleum market satisfies the four tests of good public policy: efficiency, effectiveness, equity, and ethics. Those are the standards by which this development should be judged,” he added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Business

143 firms battle for 50 oil blocks today; read details

Published

on

The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission will open the decisive commercial phase of the 2025 oil and gas licensing round on Tuesday (today), with 143 companies set to compete for 50 blocks across Nigeria’s major and emerging hydrocarbon basins.

The commercial bid conference, by invitation only, is scheduled to take place in Abuja. The development marks the latest stage in a licensing process that began in November 2025 and has attracted significant interest from companies seeking access to Nigeria’s upstream petroleum assets.

In a statement issued on Monday, the Head of Media and Corporate Communications at the NUPRC, Eniola Akinkuotu, said companies that successfully scaled the prequalification process had been notified and invited to physically attend the commercial bid conference.

According to the commission, the 50 blocks on offer cover a wide range of geological terrains and include 16 blocks in the Niger Delta Onshore, 18 in the Niger Delta Shallow Water and one in the Niger Delta Deep Offshore.

The assets also include three blocks in the Benin Basin Onshore, four in the Anambra Basin Onshore, four in the Chad Basin Onshore and four in the Benue Trough.

The statement read, “The Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission has invited qualified companies to the highly anticipated Commercial Bid Conference slated for July 21, 2026.

“These companies, which scaled through the transparent and rigorous process, have been notified and are expected to physically attend the Commercial Bid Conference taking place at the Conference Centre, Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja. Attendance is strictly by invitation.

See also  ‘It’s not only akara,’ Remi Tinubu defends comments, says FG also supports tomato, pepper sellers

“On offer are 50 oil and gas blocks across diverse terrains: Niger Delta Onshore (16), Niger Delta Shallow Water (18), Niger Delta Deep Offshore (1), Benin Basin Onshore (3), Anambra Basin Onshore (4), Chad Basin Onshore (4) and Benue Trough (4).

“In line with the guidelines, the elements of the bid parameters include the signature bonus, the work programme commitment and commitment to performance security, culminating in a weighted technical and commercial score that will determine the winning bid.”

The spread of the blocks reflects the Federal Government’s effort to attract investment beyond the traditional Niger Delta producing areas and stimulate exploration in frontier basins with significant hydrocarbon potential.

The commercial bids will be assessed using key parameters, including signature bonus, work programme commitments and commitment to performance security. The parameters will be combined into a weighted technical and commercial score that will determine the successful bidders.

The commission said the companies invited to the conference had emerged from a transparent and rigorous prequalification process. The 2025 Licensing Round was first announced on November 11, 2025, in line with the provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act, 2021.

The bid portal was subsequently launched on December 1, 2025, to enable interested companies to register and participate in the process. A pre-bid conference was held on January 14, 2026, at Eko Hotels and Suites, Lagos, to explain the guidelines and procedures to registered bidders and other interested stakeholders.

The registration and submission of documents for prequalification closed on February 27, 2026, while the prequalification stage was completed on March 16, 2026.

See also  FG begins N4tn debt settlement, captures five GenCos

A total of 286 companies submitted applications for prequalification. Following the evaluation process, 196 companies were prequalified to proceed to the technical and commercial bidding phase.

The commission said 143 of the prequalified companies subsequently submitted a total of 200 bids for the available assets. These 143 companies are now expected to participate in the commercial bid conference on Tuesday.

The number of bids submitted indicates that some companies are competing for more than one block, further underscoring the level of interest generated by the licensing round.

The commercial bid conference is expected to provide the commission with an opportunity to formally evaluate and compare the financial and operational commitments of the qualified bidders.

The process is also expected to test the seriousness of investors by placing emphasis not only on the amount offered as signature bonus but also on the work programmes and financial guarantees required to develop the assets.

The 2025 bid round is taking place against the backdrop of the Federal Government’s efforts to increase crude oil and gas production, attract fresh investment into the upstream sector and unlock previously underdeveloped petroleum assets.

Nigeria has struggled for years to attract sufficient investment into exploration and production due to concerns over regulatory uncertainty, insecurity, ageing infrastructure, project delays and the high cost of operating in the upstream sector.

The NUPRC has, however, said recent reforms under the Petroleum Industry Act and improvements in the regulatory environment are aimed at creating a more predictable framework for investors.

The licensing round also comes as the commission seeks to increase production to support government revenue, strengthen energy security and provide the feedstock required by Nigeria’s expanding domestic refining industry.

See also  Food Price Cut: Why Nigerian farmers should not cultivate maize, rice – Tedheke

The successful conclusion of the commercial bidding phase will therefore be closely watched by investors and industry stakeholders as a key test of the country’s ability to convert its petroleum resources into new exploration activity, production and economic value.

The commission’s invitation to 143 companies for the commercial bid conference represents the latest milestone in a process that began with 286 applications and has now narrowed the competition to the companies that submitted 200 bids for the 50 blocks on offer.

Following the commercial bid conference and the completion of the subsequent stages of the process, successful bidders are expected to emerge in line with the applicable rules and evaluation criteria for the 2025 Licensing Round.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Business

Reps member faces petition over alleged N19m travel debt

Published

on

A member of the House of Representatives representing Obudu/Bekwarra/Obanliku Federal Constituency of Cross River State, Peter Akpanke, has been petitioned over an alleged unpaid travel debt of more than N19.15m arising from the procurement and reissuance of international and local airline tickets.

The petition, addressed to the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission and obtained by our correspondent, was written by Ohanele Udokanmma, solicitor to Johnson Ugochukwu of Havilah Global Travels Limited, who accused the lawmaker of failing to settle outstanding payments despite repeated demands.

According to the petition, Akpanke engaged the travel agency on January 16, 2026, to procure three Business Class airline tickets to Rome for himself and two associates at a total cost of N24.48m.

The solicitor stated that the tickets were purchased with the agency’s funds at the request of the lawmaker. The petition further alleged that while in Rome on January 24, 2026, Akpanke requested the reissuance of the tickets for two of his companions at an additional cost of N5.79m.

It added that he subsequently requested the reissuance of another passenger’s ticket at a further cost of N1.52m. According to the petitioner, the total value of the international tickets rose to N31m.

The solicitor, however, acknowledged that the lawmaker made part payments, stating that he paid N10m before embarking on the trip and another N4m upon his return from Rome, bringing the total amount paid to N14m.

The petition stated, “The total amount our client received so far from Hon. Peter Akpanke was N14,000,000 with a balance of N17,794,468 from N31,000,000.”

See also  Starmer pushes strategic UK-Nigeria alliance with N1.4tn fresh deal

It also alleged that the travel agency later procured an additional local airline ticket for the lawmaker valued at N1.36m, which also remains unpaid. Cumulatively, comprising the outstanding international ticket balance and the local ticket, the petitioner claimed that Akpanke is indebted to the agency in the sum of N19,154,468.

The petition further alleged that all efforts to recover the debt had failed. The solicitor wrote, “Owing to the above facts, Hon. Peter Akpanke is now indebted to our client in the sum of N19,154,468.

“Our client has made repeated demands for the payment of these sums of money due to him as debt from Hon. Peter Akpanke, which he has refused, failed and neglected to pay, with the sole aim of not paying our client his money.”

The solicitor urged the authorities to investigate the matter, saying, “We hereby indulge you to please use your good office to investigate the matter such that justice should be done.”

When contacted, Akpanke denied owing Havilah Travels the N19.15m claimed in the petition, insisting that while he had an outstanding balance with the travel agency, the figure being circulated was false.

Speaking on the possible motive behind the petition, the lawmaker said, “If it is not politically motivated, if he has petitioned me to an anti-graft agency, why is he getting across to journalists again today?”

He added, “Number one, it’s a lie. I’m not owing Havilah Travels N19m. I’m having some balances to pay them, but it’s not up to N19m.”

See also  CBN sets tough cybersecurity timeline for banks

Akpanke argued that having an outstanding business obligation was not a criminal offence, stressing that commercial debts should not automatically be portrayed as wrongdoing.

“To owe somebody is not a crime, my brother. That’s business. If we did business and maybe I’m owing him, a lot of people are owing me too. I’m not saying I’m not owing him. He has petitioned me to an anti-graft agency. Why not allow them do their work now? Why are you engaging journalists again?” he said.

Rejecting suggestions that he had used his political position to avoid payment, the federal lawmaker maintained that he had enjoyed a longstanding business relationship with the travel agency.

“What has political power got to do with buying tickets? Is that the first time he is buying tickets for me? He has bought tickets for me worth over N100m. Maybe I stayed owing him for some time and it made him petition me. That man had no business doing that,” Akpanke said.

He further defended the practice of purchasing airline tickets on credit, saying, “Which law says you cannot buy tickets on credit? I don’t like blackmailing people because tomorrow is pregnant.”

While admitting that he had transacted with Havilah Travels, Akpanke insisted he had been making payments and could provide proof.

“I will not tell you that I didn’t do business with Havilah Travels. I did. And I’m not owing them N19 million. I’ve been paying. I can show you evidence of the last payment I made to him. So what is all that rubbish now? The person who introduced us together has even told him, ‘Don’t worry, I will bear the liabilities.’ So why is he going to journalists?” he said.

See also  FG begins N4tn debt settlement, captures five GenCos

He warned that he could also publicise his experience with the agency, adding, “I can equally blackmail them and let Nigerians know that when you do business with them, once you owe them, they begin to petition you to the EFCC and all those places. Has it ever stopped me from paying? I know that I have an obligation to pay him.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending