Connect with us

News

Report of more children failing DNA test ignites fresh arguments

Published

on

Since the recent report that one in every four children fail DeoxyRibonucleic Acid, DNA, test, made headlines, discussions around what most people refer to as paternity scam has been raging across the country.

The argument is also about how unfaithful most women have become in marriage- a development believed in some quarters to be sending many men to their early graves.

DNA, responsible for one’s paternity, is a molecule that contains the genetic instructions for the development, functioning, growth and reproduction of all known organisms and many viruses. It’s essentially the master blueprint for life.

However, this test which is one of the breakthroughs in molecular biology has caused a lot of heartaches to many families. This is because when the result is contrary to what the man expects, it is not only the men that are left shattered, the children involved are equally disoriented, especially when they are already adults.

According to the latest study by Smart DNA Nigeria, covering data from July 2024 to June 2025, 25 percent of paternity tests returned negative, showing only a slight drop from the 27 percent in 2024.

The study further revealed that firstborn children were the most likely to yield to exclusions, with firstborn sons topping the list at 64 percent. Smart DNA said the trend raises troubling questions about family structures, trust and social stability in urban Nigeria.

Alongside domestic disputes, the report revealed a surge in immigration-related DNA testing, which accounted for 13.1 percent of all tests during the period.

The spike, according to the research, is linked to Nigeria’s ongoing “Japa” movement, as more families pursue foreign citizenship and documentation for children relocating abroad.

The data also showed sharp gender and age divides in testing patterns. It was established that men initiated 88.2 percent of all tests and this is often driven by long-standing doubts, while women accounted for just 11.8 percent.

See also  Two bodies recovered from rubble of burnt Great Nigeria Insurance Building in Lagos

Nearly half of all tests were ordered by men aged 41 and above, reflecting the influence of financial stability on decision-making. Meanwhile, most tests involved children aged zero to five suggesting parents’ preference for resolving doubts early.

Geographically, Lagos remained the hub for DNA testing, accounting for 69 percent of all cases, though the balance shifted from the Mainland which stood at 59.4 percent toward the Island at 40.6 percent. Lekki led as the single top location at 20.3 percent.

In terms of ethnicity, Yoruba clients made up 53 percent of cases, Igbo 31.3 percent and Hausa just 1.2 percent, a distribution that points to cultural differences in attitudes toward paternity testing, according to the report.

The report also found that 83.7 percent of tests were carried out for peace of mind rather than legal purposes with court-mandated cases making up only 1.4 percent.

Most families tested only one child, reinforcing the view that suspicions are typically targeted rather than broad. Boys were tested more frequently than girls, reflecting traditional concerns over inheritance and lineage.

According to the Operations Manager, Smart DNA, Elizabeth Digia, the findings reflect more than just scientific data. “These statistics tell us something profound about trust, relationships and the legal and economic realities of Nigerian families today,” she noted, emphasising the need for sensitivity in handling the life-changing outcomes of DNA testing.

The report called for legal reform to address paternity fraud, greater integration of DNA testing into healthcare and public education to counter misconceptions about DNA services.

It emphasised that the findings reflect clients with existing paternity concerns and should not be generalised to the wider population.

See also  Reps summon ministers over budget underperformance

Now, with the outcome of the research findings in the public domain, the arguments have taken various forms.

Some people believe that it is not necessary so long as nobody is contesting ownership of the child with the father.

Those on this side of the argument are insisting that except there is a man somewhere, who is claiming ownership of one’s children, DNA test is not necessary. Their argument is that such a test could only unearth a life-long secret and cause emotional and psychological trauma that could even lead to insanity or even death.

A vocal voice on this side is a clinical psychologist with a private hospital in Lagos, Dr Dipo Olawale.

“If you ask me, I would say that a man should not just subject his children to a DNA test just because he is suspicious of his wife’s fidelity in the marriage, except there is a man somewhere, who is contesting ownership of his children.

“This is because if the test turns out positive, meaning that the children belong to another man that you don’t even know, it will only cause you emotional and psychological trauma

“And if you are a temperamental person, you could even kill your wife out of anger and end up in jail. So, why not bury your suspicion and let peace reign so long as nobody is claiming ownership of your children; that’s my position on that,” he told DAILY POST.

However, there are those who argue that it is necessary to go for a DNA test once a man becomes suspicious of his wife’s fidelity, whether another man is contesting ownership of the children or not.

Those on this divide are also saying that such action is to prevent future heartbreak.

Chief Wole Adegbola is one of those who believe that once a man suspects his wife of engaging in extramarital affairs, he should call for a DNA test.

See also  Agbakoba advocates new constitution, fiscal federalism

He said it is to forestall future heartbreak, which could be difficult to bear at that point.

He said: “It is advisable to call for a DNA test on your children, especially when they are still children, if you suspect that your wife has not been faithful.

“I say this because I have seen a man who found out from his wife that their 28-year-old son, who had graduated from the University, was not his biological son. This revelation came just because they had a misunderstanding and the woman got angry and in fit of that anger, she spilled the beans.

“What do you expect such a man to do? Where do you expect him to go from there? After training a child from nursery school to the university level, your wife is telling you that the child is not yours after all, how do you explain that?

“So, it is always very important to know early so that even if you decide to train such a child or children, it will be a deliberate personal decision.

“This is also very important because some women are devils who have come into some men’s lives to destroy them.

“Such women will let the cat out of the bag when you least expect it, whether anybody is laying claim to the children or not.

“So, to avoid the psychological and emotional torture that comes with such future revelations, it is advisable to go for a DNA test early in marriage, especially where there are sufficient grounds for suspicion.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Sultan backs Sharia law in Oyo, Ekiti

Published

on

President-General, Nigeria Supreme Council of Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) and Sultan of Sokoto, Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III, has expressed support for the establishment of an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo states.

But the Aare Ona Kakanfo of Yorubaland, Gani Adams, condemned the attempt to introduce Sharia in the South West, saying it is alien to Yoruba culture and religious beliefs.

The 20th Sultan of Sokoto and the spiritual leader of Nigeria’s Muslims also expressed concern about the spate of intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country. He noted that Muslims in the South West had been denied their constitutional rights to a Shariah Court of Appeal.

In a statement, yesterday, by the Deputy National Legal Adviser of NSCIA, Haroun Eze, the traditional ruler lamented the unwarranted resistance and objections from political and traditional quarters to the Muslim community’s efforts to establish an Independent Shariah Arbitration Panel in Ekiti.

He said this was coming barely a few weeks after the announcement on the inauguration of a Shariah panel in Oyo generated “unnecessary anxiety, thereby leading to its indefinite postponement.

“The Independent Arbitration Panel, which is a voluntary platform designed solely for the resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims, was to fill the inexplicable vacuum created by the failure of the political elite in the South West to establish Sharia courts, as allowed by the Nigerian Constitution, in South West, despite the huge population of Muslims in the region,” Sultan said.

See also  FG strengthens marshals to curb illicit mining

According to the monarch, such scenarios as the denial of the rights of female students to wear the Hijab despite a Supreme Court judgment, are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslims in the region from practising their faith.

Speaking during the 2025 Oodua festival at Enuwa Square, Ile-Ife, Osun State, yesterday, Adams stressed that the introduction of Sharia was to destabilise the Yoruba land by religious fanatics and fundamentalists. He emphasised that while Saudi Arabia is an Islamic kingdom where Sharia aligns with religious teachings and is widely accepted, Nigeria remains a nation where the constitution guarantees freedom of religion.

According to him, Saudi Arabia is a good example of an Islamic kingdom that practises Sharia law according to the Holy Quran. He said: “The Saudis also adhere strictly to the law, and they are happy because Sharia law is in tandem with their religious beliefs and teachings. But Nigeria is a secular nation where the constitution allows every citizen to practise whatever religion they believe in freely without any intimidation.

“Sharia law is alien to our culture and religious beliefs in Yoruba land; therefore, those religious fanatics masquerading as Muslims should stay away from acts that could set Yorubaland on fire.”

Meanwhile, berating the recent influx of Islamic State’s West Africa Province (ISWAP) in the South West, Adams called on the federal and state government to intensify efforts to tackle insecurity in the region. Adams further expressed the readiness of the Oodua People’s Congress (OPC) to partner other security groups in curbing the scourge in Yoruba land.

See also  Supreme Court never granted Alaafin supremacy rights, lawyer backs Ooni

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Statement on the Rejection of Sharia Law in South-West Nigeria

Published

on

The Sultan of Sokoto and the leadership of the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) must clearly understand this position: the Yoruba people of South-West Nigeria do not need, want, or accept Sharia law as a governing system in their land.

Yoruba society is uniquely pluralistic. In most families across the South-West, Christians, Muslims, and traditional worshippers coexist peacefully under the same roof. This interwoven family structure is one of our greatest strengths. Introducing Sharia law into such a setting would place families on a collision course, fracture long-standing relationships, and undermine the shared values that have sustained our people for generations.

It is important to ask a fundamental question: Is it compulsory or by force that Muslims must live under Sharia law? Many Muslims across the world practice their faith peacefully without imposing religious law on diverse societies. Faith should be a personal conviction, not a political weapon.

Any attempt—direct or indirect—to Islamise the South-West against the will of its people will be firmly resisted through lawful and collective means, because the Yoruba are not a monolithic religious bloc. Our philosophies, cultures, and worldviews are distinct. We cherish family unity, tolerance, and mutual respect above religious extremism.

Let it be clearly stated: the Yoruba are not religious bigots, nor are we extremists. We are a civilized people who value progress, coexistence, and peace. We reject anything that may plunge our land into chaos, division, or bloodshed. Therefore, those advocating Sharia governance should restrict such ambitions to regions where it is openly accepted. The people of the South-West are not interested.

See also  Reps summon ministers over budget underperformance

Nigeria is constitutionally a secular state, and the implementation of Sharia law as a state system directly contradicts the principles of secularism, equal citizenship, and fundamental human rights. If Nigeria intends to remain united, no religious legal system should be imposed on unwilling populations.

Furthermore, the practical outcomes of Sharia implementation in parts of Northern Nigeria raise serious concerns. These include:

Persistent insecurity and terrorism

Banditry and mass kidnapping

Ethnic and religious tensions

Widespread poverty and hunger

High levels of illiteracy

Deep social inequality and segregation

These realities cannot be ignored, and they offer no justification for exporting such a system to the South-West.

To our Muslim brothers and sisters in the OduduwaYorubaterritory: peaceful coexistence is our collective responsibility. We must not allow the mistakes and crises of other regions to destabilize our homeland. The Yoruba way has always been dialogue, tolerance, and mutual respect—and we intend to preserve it.

Leave the Oduduwa Yoruba land as it is. Let us live in peace.

Ire oooo.

Signed
Comrade Oyegunle Oluwamayowa Omotoyole (Omayor)
Oduduwa Nation Home-Based Youth Leader.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Sultan-Led NSCIA Slams Southern Resistance To Sharia Panels Establishment

Published

on

The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA) under the leadership of its President-General and Sultan of Sokoto, His Eminence, Alh. Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar, has expressed concern over alleged intolerance and disregard for the rights of Muslims, especially in the southern part of the country.

A statement signed by NSCIA deputy national legal adviser, Imam Haron Muhammed Eze, on Wednesday, said the most recent of this development emanated from Ekiti state where the efforts of the Muslim community to set up an Independent Sharia (Arbitration) panel was met with resistance and objections from both political and traditional quarters.

It added that this came a few weeks after the announcement of the inauguration of a Sharia panel in Oyo state generated anxiety and led to its indefinite postponement.

The Independent Sharia Panel is a voluntary platform designed solely for resolution of civil and marital disputes among consenting Muslims.

According to the statement, the Arbitration and the Sharia Court of Appeal, just like the Customary Court of Appeal are provided in section 275 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) of the Republic of Nigeria confirming the legality of both initiatives.

It added that the NSCIA strongly supported the establishment of the Independent Sharia Arbitration Panel in Ekiti and Oyo States for the intended purpose, especially where the Muslims in the states have been denied their constitutional right to a Sharia Court of Appeal in all the states of South-West Nigeria.

The group, while disapproving of the Supreme Court judgement, said their judgements are nothing but calculated attempts to prevent Muslim in the region from practicing their faith.

See also  Supreme Court never granted Alaafin supremacy rights, lawyer backs Ooni

The NSCIA stressed that the council cannot find any legal justification for the resistance. It called on governors and traditional authorities in the southern part of the country, particularly the South-West, to ensure that the constitutional rights of Muslims in their respective domains are preserved and protected.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending