Connect with us

Business

Meter costs spark DisCos–FG showdown on tariffs

Published

on

The Bureau of Public Enterprises, an agency of the Federal Government, has said that electricity consumers will pay for the ongoing free meter installation through their tariffs.

The disclosure comes amid a row with electricity distribution companies over who is responsible for covering the cost of the prepaid meters being rolled out under World Bank–funded programmes.

The PUNCH reports that the Federal Government and electricity distribution companies have been at loggerheads over who bears the cost of prepaid meters being rolled out by the Federal Government.

The disagreement erupted after the Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, directed that prepaid meters procured under the World Bank–funded Distribution Sector Recovery Programme must be installed for electricity consumers free of charge, warning that any official or installer found collecting money would be prosecuted.

However, electricity distribution companies expressed doubt over the directive, insisting that although customers may not pay cash upfront, the meters would still be paid for by the DisCos over a period of 10 years, raising concerns about cost recovery, installation expenses, and the financial implications for operators.

Reacting to the controversy, the Director-General of the Bureau of Public Enterprises, Ayo Gbeleyi, dismissed claims that the DisCos were being asked to pay for the meters over a 10-year period, regretting that the Federal Government’s free metering programme was receiving pushback from the DisCos.

Speaking in Lagos at the N501bn bond issuance signing ceremony to settle power sector debt, Gbeleyi expressed concern that the DisCos were giving a wrong narrative as far as the free metering initiative was concerned.

Addressing claims by DisCos that they were expected to repay the cost of the meters over a decade, the BPE boss said such assertions were inaccurate and misleading. He noted that meter costs are embedded in tariffs over time, just like transformers, feeders, and other investments of the DisCos.

“We’ve had pushback where some have said, ‘No, the DisCos are paying for the meters over 10 years.’ The truth is, every component of investment that goes into the DisCos gets recouped through the tariff structure. So, whether it is a feeder pillar, whether it is a transformer, or whether it is a meter, we as consumers will ultimately pay for those pieces of equipment through the tariff design,” he said.

See also  Nigerians battle shortage of cooking gas as price of 12.5kg cylinder of gas rises to N25,000

Gbeleyi’s clarification shows that meters are not given to customers at no cost, as they would pay for them through their tariffs. He added that the DisCos often failed to mention the concessional nature of the Federal Government’s intervention, which he said was to be repaid over 20 years.

“However, what they are not telling you is that the Federal Government’s major intervention is indeed one of the best loan transactions today extended to the power sector. It is a 20-year loan facility. It comes with a five-year principal moratorium and a two-year interest moratorium to the DisCos. We have never seen any capital lending to that sector of that magnitude in the history of the power sector in Nigeria,” Gbeleyi said.

He insisted that suggestions that DisCos were paying for the meters were unfounded. “So, for anyone to then suggest that they are paying over 10 years, or that the DisCos are paying for it, that’s absolutely not the case. So we are taking this opportunity to provide that clarity to Nigerians,” he added.

According to him, the Federal Government had embarked on the Distribution Sector Recovery Programme, which is a $500m loan intervention from the World Bank to assist distribution companies to strengthen their infrastructure and improve governance, as well as enhance liquidity.

“In this regard, a total of about 3.22 million meters are being made available to the DisCos,” Gbeleyi said.

Clarifying the status of the metering initiative, he said that the meters were being given to consumers free of charge.

“At this juncture, permit me to also elaborate and clarify that, last week, together with the Minister of Power, we were at the Apapa Port to inspect the recent batch of meters that are coming to the country. In total, out of the initial contract of about 1,437,500 units of meters, we have received over 600,000 meters. And we have also installed close to 75,000 meters, free of charge indeed, to consumers.”

Gbeleyi stressed that electricity consumers were not required to pay for the meters, noting that the intervention was targeted at addressing Nigeria’s wide metering gap.

“Let me reiterate that customers are not meant to pay for these meters. The meters are meant to be given, especially to the unmetered customers. We have about 5.9 million unmetered customers in the country today,” he said.

See also  Cooking gas nears N2,000/kg ahead of Sallah celebrations

According to him, the World Bank–supported programme would only partially bridge the gap, with another intervention already in place to complement it.

“In order to bridge that gap, there is a programme to implement 3.22 million meters. There is another programme that is being led by the Office of the Special Adviser to the President on Energy under the Presidential Metering Initiative, which will also deliver another batch of 2.61 million meters to the DisCos,” Gbeleyi stated.

Earlier, power distribution companies had raised concerns over the minister’s directive, describing it as politically motivated and lacking proper stakeholder consultation.

Operators, who spoke anonymously due to the sensitive nature of the matter, said Adelabu’s announcement failed to consider the role of meter installers and manufacturers, as well as the question of who would bear installation costs.

Last Thursday, the Federal Government banned electricity distribution companies and installers from collecting any form of payment for meters, with Adelabu issuing the warning during an on-site inspection of newly imported smart meters at APM Terminals, Apapa, Lagos.

The minister said the meters were procured under the World Bank–funded Distribution Sector Recovery Programme and must be installed for consumers free of charge, regardless of their tariff band.

“I want to mention that it is unprecedented that these meters are to be installed and distributed to consumers free of charge—free of charge! Nobody should collect money from any consumer. It is an illegality. It is an offence for the officials of distribution companies across Nigeria to request a dime before installation; even the indirect installers cannot ask consumers for a dime. It has to be installed free of charge so that billings and collections will improve for the sector,” Adelabu said.

Despite this, DisCo operators maintained that the cost burden would still fall on them over time. They said the meters tagged as free by the Federal Government would still be paid for by the DisCos within a period of 10 years, adding that it was unclear why DisCos were expected to bear installation costs.

“Those meters you see, someone has to pay for them, and the government expects the DisCos to bear the cost of the so-called free meters. They said the DisCos can pay it over 10 years,” an official with a distribution company stated, but Gbeleyi described this as untrue.

See also  Business leaders reject proposed beverage tax hike

The official warned that such costs must be recognised in tariff calculations. “When you ask the DisCos to pay for any capital expenditure, we call it allowable capex. You have to allow it when computing their tariffs; otherwise, it makes their balance sheets toxic,” the source said.

Another operator questioned the role of installers in the arrangement. “We need to know that meter installers are not staff of the DisCos. They are already asking who will pay them if the consumers do not pay. Did the minister consider all those? You said the people should not pay the installers; who should pay them? We, the DisCos, are not the ones installing meters,” the operator said.

The operators described Adelabu’s comments as populist. “The statement was just a populist statement from a politician. We are not sure if the President sent him that message. He said everything should be free; where is the position of cost recovery? Anything you do in the power sector, you have to first consider who bears the cost. Somebody has to bear the cost to avoid debt piling up,” one source stated.

They added that wider consultation was needed to avoid misleading the public. “The government ought to sit with the DisCos and the meter manufacturers to seek advice if the plan is to make sure the people don’t bear any cost, and we will come up with our various contributions.

“But instead of doing that, the government would go and make unrealistic promises to the public. For instance, the meters are coming in batches, but you have made the masses believe that there are enough meters for everyone. That’s not the reality,” another source said.

The standoff testifies to the persistent tensions between regulators and operators in the power sector, even as the Federal Government insists that the metering intervention is designed to protect consumers and improve billing efficiency.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Nigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World Bank

Published

on

The World Bank says Nigeria’s 36 states recorded a 93 per cent increase in revenues between 2023 and 2025 but education received a declining share of the sector’s expenditure.

The bank disclosed this in its latest Nigeria Development Update, which examined how increased public revenues have influenced spending priorities across the federation.

The report was made available to the News Agency of Nigeria by the World Bank in Washington D.C.

According to the report, states’ aggregate revenues rose by approximately 93 per cent in real terms, while expenditure increased by 92 per cent during the period.

The report attributed the improvement partly to exchange-rate reforms, petrol subsidy removal, stronger revenue administration and increased allocations from the federation account.

It said states also benefited from refunds, settlement of longstanding federal obligations, intervention funds, and stronger Value Added Tax collections.

However, education’s share of total state expenditure declined from 14.9 per cent in 2021 to 12.1 per cent in 2025, according to the report.

Health expenditure remained broadly stable at approximately seven per cent, while social protection’s share increased from 1.4 per cent to 4.4 per cent.

The bank said capital expenditure increased significantly, accounting for 61 per cent of state spending, compared with 46 per cent previously.

Transport infrastructure recorded the largest increase, alongside substantial spending on housing, agriculture and other economic investments.

The report quoted Mathew Verghis, the World Bank Country Director for Nigeria, as saying that increased revenues provided the opportunity to improve infrastructure, education, healthcare, and water services.

See also  Dangote to donate one-third of wealth to charity, daughter reveals

He said greater spending efficiency, accountability and improved service delivery were essential to ensuring that additional public resources benefited Nigerians.

The bank acknowledged improvements in states’ fiscal reporting, transparency and internally generated revenue.

It, however, stressed that stronger investment in human capital was necessary to translate economic reforms into sustainable employment and improved living standards.

The report also projected average economic growth of 4.4 per cent between 2026 and 2028, subject to sustained reforms and improved service delivery.

It urged federal and state authorities to ensure that increased public revenues translated into tangible improvements in Nigerians’ welfare.

NAN

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Nigeria promotes investment without building production capacity – UNILAG don

Published

on

A professor of Comparative Political Economy at the University of Lagos, Adelaja Odukoya, has asserted that Nigeria’s economic policies promote investment without sufficiently strengthening domestic production.

Odukoya argued that the contradiction had weakened the country’s productive foundations, with policies encouraging investment and entrepreneurship while failing to create the technological capacity, productive employment and processing industries needed to drive sustainable development.

Odukoya spoke at the maiden edition of the Adeleke University Toyin Falola Annual Lecture, held on Thursday at the Performing Arts Theatre, Adeleke University, Ede.

The lecture had as its theme, “History, Power and Accumulation: Reimagining Africa in the Globally Disorderly Order.”

Odukoya identified several contradictions in the way the Nigerian state manages economic activity.

He said, “The state promotes investment without creating conditions for technological transfer. It encourages entrepreneurship without generating sufficient productive employment.

“It expands primary-product exports while leaving processing capacity undeveloped. It constructs infrastructure without establishing strong linkages with domestic production.”

According to him, the contradictions explain why increased economic activity and accumulation do not necessarily translate into development.

“Accumulation is not synonymous with development,” Odukoya stated.

He argued that genuine development should be measured by the expansion of productive, technological, institutional and human capabilities.

“A country could attract investment, export minerals and agricultural commodities and record economic activity while still failing to build the domestic industries and technological capabilities required for long-term development,” he said.

His argument was echoed by Prof Toyin Falola, who said Africa’s vast natural resources would continue to reinforce dependency unless governments developed the industrial, technological and institutional capacity to transform them into productive power.

See also  Amazon to cut 16,000 jobs worldwide

Falola said Africa’s resource problem was not simply one of historical exploitation, but also the continent’s failure to convert its resource endowments into power.

“The issue, however, is not just to repeat the history of exploitation. It is more important to know how Africa turns its great resources into power,” Falola said.

He argued that Africa could not afford to remain a spectator as global economic and geopolitical arrangements continued to change, stressing that resource ownership without the capacity to add value would not guarantee influence.

Falola said the continent required a combination of knowledge, government policy and industrial capacity to change its economic position.

“There must be universities that generate new knowledge; there must be governments that translate this knowledge into policies; there must be industries that add value to the continent’s natural resources,” he said.

He added that Africa needed more than improved infrastructure and stronger economies if it wanted to exercise greater influence in the global system.

“The future of the continent will require more than just better infrastructure, improved economies, and more effective political institutions,” Falola said.

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Import waivers, insecurity end two-year agric trade surplus

Published

on

Import waivers meant to ease hunger and insecurity on farms have led to a deficit, ending a two-year run of surpluses, as Nigeria’s agricultural trade balance swung from a N740.27bn surplus in the first half of 2025 to a N56.13bn deficit in H1 2026, according to agriculture and trade experts.

Recent foreign trade data from the National Bureau of Statistics showed that agricultural exports fell by 33.28 per cent, or N985.14bn, to N1.98tn in H1 2026 from N2.96tn in H1 2025.

Agricultural imports fell by only 8.50 per cent, or N188.74bn, to N2.03tn from N2.22tn over the same period. The gap between the two movements produced a N796.40bn swing in the trade balance.

Nigeria recorded a N365.74bn deficit in H1 2023, when imports of N926.25bn far exceeded exports of N560.51bn. The balance then turned to a N194.92bn surplus in H1 2024 before it widened to N740.27bn in H1 2025.

In separate phone interviews with The PUNCH, Agribusiness experts, including the Chairman of the Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry’s Agricultural and Allied Group, Tunde Banjoko, explained that recent government policy led to the shift.

Banjoko said, “Some waivers were given for products like palm oil and rice, and the import tariffs were drastically reduced. It became more favourable for people to import than to patronise local producers.”

He said the waivers on food commodities hurt domestic producers, even though lower tariffs on tractors and manufacturing equipment helped them.

According to Banjoko, “The effect is that our imports will rise above our exports. Second, we will discourage local production. Thirdly, we will be reducing employment, because some factories will shut down if they are not able to compete.”

See also  Kaduna IGR rises to N85bn under gov Uba Sani — Official

Banjoko also said weak funding for processors compounds the problem. He said foreign direct investment flows mainly into the capital market rather than into production and processing, so local processors cannot scale.

He urged the Federal Government to speed up the Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones programme. “We should speed up such projects where we can produce enough for our country and start exporting, not look for shortcuts by reducing prices,” Banjoko added.

Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, identified two major factors behind the deficit. He said the first was the Federal Government’s decision to allow some food imports to tackle runaway inflation.

Yusuf said, “The first is the decision of the government to allow for some food imports as a result of the challenges of food inflation, which at a point was getting almost completely out of hand.”

He added that insecurity worsened the supply gap and cut export capacity, stating, “Insecurity led many farmers to leave their farms. Many of them have ended up in IDP camps, and quite a number have completely abandoned farming.”

He added that farmers cannot export without output. Yusuf said, “You can only export when you have the output.”

Yusuf also said high input costs and falling produce prices have discouraged farming. He said, “Most of these inputs are imported, so the exchange rate situation has seriously affected the cost of inputs, and the prices of produce have gone down.”

He urged the Federal Government to cut the cost of fertiliser, agrochemicals, machinery and improved seedlings. He also called for a minimum guaranteed price for agricultural produce.

See also  Dangote to donate one-third of wealth to charity, daughter reveals

Yusuf said, “The government can establish a threshold below which, if prices fall, it will give farmers some compensation. That is the way it is done in many other economies.”

Source: punchng.com

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending