There are strong indications that the Independent National Electoral Commission and the National Assembly have agreed to move the 2027 presidential election to January 16, 2027, in a dramatic reversal of the earlier February 20 date, The PUNCH gathered.

Similarly, the governorship elections are also set to be brought forward to January 30, 2027, multiple sources within the electoral body and the legislature confirmed on Monday.

The development comes a few hours after the Senate and House of Representatives suspended the planned harmonisation of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill to focus on an emergency plenary session convened for Tuesday, where the new dates are expected to top deliberations.

“After several consultations and meetings, INEC and the leadership of the National Assembly have now agreed on a new date for next year’s election,” a senior INEC official who requested anonymity because he was not authorised to speak on the matter, told The PUNCH.

“The new dates will now be January 16 and 30 for presidential and governorship elections, respectively,” the source added.

A ranking senator also corroborated the development, though he cautioned that the proposal was still subject to debate on the floor.

“Whoever hinted to you about the new dates is correct. That is the proposal currently on the table. However, that doesn’t mean it can’t change tomorrow,” he said.

The shift marks a significant turning point in the evolving electoral calendar for 2027 and underscores the mounting political, religious and logistical pressures surrounding Nigeria’s next general elections.

INEC had initially fixed Saturday, February 20, 2027, for the presidential and National Assembly elections, with governorship and state Houses of Assembly polls scheduled for March 6, 2027.

However, the February 20 date drew sharp criticism from Muslim groups and political stakeholders who argued that it coincided with the holy month of Ramadan, projected to run from February 7 to March 8, 2027.

For many observers, the controversy quickly transformed from a scheduling matter into a broader debate about inclusivity, religious sensitivity and voter participation in a multi-faith nation.

Over the weekend, there were indications that lawmakers were considering February 13 as a compromise date to address concerns raised by Muslim faithful who frowned at the idea of voting during fasting.

But fresh information obtained by The PUNCH indicated that consultations between INEC and the National Assembly leadership had produced a more drastic option, moving the polls into January.

If adopted, the January 16 date would make the 2027 presidential election one of the earliest in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic calendar, effectively compressing campaign timelines and administrative preparations.

Emergency plenary

The National Assembly had on Sunday announced that it would reconvene plenary on Tuesday, February 17, 2026, cutting short its recess amid what it described as the need to take “very crucial decisions.”

In a notice signed by the Clerk to the National Assembly, Kamoru Ogunlana, senators and members of the House of Representatives were directed to resume sitting at 11:00 a.m.

“I am directed to inform all Distinguished Senators and Honourable Members of the National Assembly that the Senate and House of Representatives shall reconvene Plenary session at 11:00 am on Tuesday, 17th February 2026, respectively,” the notice read.

“Consequently, all Distinguished Senators and Honourable Members are kindly requested to take note and reschedule their engagements accordingly to enable them attend the session, as very crucial decisions shall be taken by each Chamber during the session,” Ogunlana added.

While the official communication did not specify the agenda, insiders told The PUNCH that the reconsideration of the 2027 election timetable was the primary trigger for the abrupt resumption.

“It is more of an extraordinary plenary session to review the 2027 presidential election date as stipulated in the Electoral Act amendment.

“That is why our recess has been cut short through the announcement made by the Clerk of the National Assembly,” a senator confided earlier.

Another Senate source had disclosed that “If all goes according to plan, the presidential poll date may be brought forward to February 13 from the previously announced February 20 by INEC.”

The latest proposal, however, appears to have gone further, with January 16 now emerging as the frontrunner.

Electoral bill harmonisation suspended

Meanwhile, the much-anticipated meeting of the Senate and House of Representatives conference committees to harmonise differences in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill has been put on hold.

The joint committee had been scheduled to meet on Monday, February 16, to reconcile contentious provisions in the versions passed by both chambers.

But members confirmed that the emergency plenary disrupted the timetable.

“The meeting is put on hold until after the sitting of both chambers tomorrow,” Sada Soli, a member of the House  conference committee representing Jibia/Kaita Federal Constituency of Katsina State, said.

Another member of the committee and Deputy Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriation, Iduma Igariwey, also confirmed the postponement.

“It is not holding because of the emergency National Assembly meeting scheduled for tomorrow,” the Ebonyi lawmaker said when asked if the harmonisation meeting would proceed as planned.

A senator familiar with the development added, “It has been suspended for now until we finish tomorrow’s (today) emergency meeting. It is only then that we can decide on the next move and a new date for the conference committee.”

The suspension suggests that lawmakers may first settle the politically sensitive issue of election dates before finalising other amendments, including provisions on electronic transmission of results and dispute resolution timelines.

INEC’s balancing act

INEC had earlier acknowledged public concerns over the February 20 date and hinted that it could seek legislative intervention if necessary.

In a statement issued last Friday by the National Commissioner and Chairman of the Information and Voter Education Committee, Mohammed Haruna, the commission said the timetable was initially drawn in strict compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements.

“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the commission has taken due notice of concerns expressed by stakeholders regarding the coincidence of the scheduled dates with certain nationally recognised holidays and observances.

“The commission wishes to assure the public that it remains sensitive to all legitimate concerns that may impact electoral participation and the overall conduct of elections.

“In view of these representations, the commission is currently undertaking consultations and may, where necessary, seek appropriate legislative intervention to address the concerns raised, while ensuring that any adjustment remains consistent with constitutional and statutory requirements,” the statement read.

The statement followed calls by several stakeholders, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, who wrote on his official X handle that the February 20 date falls “squarely within the Ramadan period (February 7 – March 8, 2027), a sacred season of fasting, reflection, and spiritual devotion for millions of Nigerian Muslims.”

Former presidential aide Bashir Ahmad also urged INEC to reconsider the dates.

“If the intention is to encourage full and inclusive participation in the electoral process, scheduling such a critical national exercise during Ramadan may present challenges for a large segment of the population.

“Many Muslims tend to reduce engagement in demanding worldly activities during this period to focus on religious obligations.

“Given the significant Muslim population in this country, it may be worthwhile to reconsider the timing to ensure broader participation and convenience for all citizens. I do hope this observation will be taken in the spirit of inclusiveness and national cohesion,” he wrote.

Technology debate deepens

The date controversy comes on the heels of intense debate over the electronic transmission of results in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill.

Last week, the Senate approved electronic transmission of results to INEC’s Result Viewing Portal but stopped short of making real-time uploads compulsory, retaining manual collation as a backup.

Defending the decision, Senate Leader Opeyemi Bamidele cited infrastructural challenges.

“By global standards, the real-time electronic transmission of election results may not be practicable at this stage of our development.

“To avoid a situation that compounds our country’s woes, we should make it discretionary since Section 62(2) of the Electoral Act, 2022 has already established the National Electronic Register of Election Results,” he said.

On power supply, he added, “Even though our generation capacity hovers roughly between 12,000 and 13,500 megawatts, our distribution and transmission capacity is acutely limited. As we all know, it can only deliver 4,500 megawatts to households nationwide.

“But with the Electricity Act, 2025, our power sector will record significant growth from this financial year.”

Bamidele insisted that “The data speak directly to the stark realities of our federation and not emotion or sentiment.”

The decision to shift the 2027 presidential poll, if ratified, could significantly alter the political calculations of parties and aspirants.

Campaign timelines would be shortened, party primaries may be brought forward, and INEC would need to recalibrate its logistics, procurement and training schedules.

Analysts say the move could enhance voter participation among Muslims and reduce the risk of low turnout in northern states, where Ramadan observance is intense.

However, the compressed schedule may also test INEC’s administrative capacity and the readiness of political parties to mobilise nationwide structures earlier than anticipated.

Beyond dates, lawmakers are also considering broader reforms aimed at concluding election petitions before inauguration on May 29, 2027.

Earlier proposals included conducting elections at least 185 days before the expiration of incumbents’ tenure and shortening timelines for tribunal and appellate decisions.

As plenary resumes under extraordinary circumstances, the convergence of religious considerations, technological limitations and constitutional mandates has placed the National Assembly and INEC at the centre of one of the most consequential electoral recalibrations in recent history.

A Senate source told The PUNCH, “This session is crucial. It is about more than dates; it is about ensuring that every Nigerian, regardless of faith, has a fair opportunity to participate in the electoral process. The decisions we take here could define the credibility of the 2027 elections.”

Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, was detained at the headquarters of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in Abuja on Monday night after hours of interrogation over an alleged N432 billion corruption probe.

El-Rufai, a chieftain of the African Democratic Congress, is also expected to face criminal prosecution over the alleged bugging of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu’s phone.

Multiple sources within the anti-graft agency confirmed to The PUNCH that the former governor, who arrived at the commission’s Jabi headquarters around 10am in response to an invitation, was grilled over allegations arising from the 2024 report of the Kaduna State House of Assembly which accused his administration of misappropriating loans, violating due process in contract awards and plunging the state into heavy debt.

“The commission has been investigating him for about a year now. As a commission, we don’t just rush to invite suspects. Persons accused are always the last; that is after we might have done our investigation to an advanced stage.

“We are investigating him on the allegations against him by the Kaduna State Assembly,” a senior EFCC source told one of our correspondents.

Asked late Monday night whether El-Rufai would regain his freedom, the source responded bluntly, “He is still in our custody and wouldn’t be released today (Monday).”

The EFCC spokesman, Dele Oyewale, confirmed that the former governor honoured the commission’s invitation but declined further comments on the nature of the interrogation or the next line of action.

The detention marks a dramatic escalation in the legal troubles confronting the outspoken former Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, whose recent public criticism of the Federal Government and security agencies has triggered fresh political tensions.

Alleged N423bn misappropriation

The EFCC interrogation is rooted in the report of the Kaduna State House of Assembly’s ad hoc committee constituted in 2024 to investigate finances, loans and contracts awarded between 2015 and 2023 under El-Rufai’s administration.

Presenting the committee’s report during plenary last year, the committee chairman, Henry Zacharia, alleged that most of the loans obtained by the El-Rufai administration within the eight years were not utilised for the purposes for which they were secured.

While receiving the report, the Speaker of the House, Yusuf Dahiru Leman, alleged that about N423bn was siphoned under the El-Rufai administration, leaving Kaduna State with heavy financial liabilities and a rising debt profile.

The committee recommended the investigation and prosecution of the former governor and several members of his cabinet over alleged abuse of office, award of contracts without due process, diversion of public funds, money laundering and reckless borrowing.

The Assembly subsequently endorsed a petition to the EFCC and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, urging them to take up the matter.

Beyond the headline N423bn allegation, the legislative report also referenced disputed cash payments and contracts amounting to over N155m, as well as the alleged diversion of N1.37bn earmarked for a light rail project. It also cited the purported laundering of N64.8m by senior aides.

El-Rufai has consistently denied the allegations, describing the probe as politically motivated and insisting that all loans obtained during his tenure were duly appropriated and applied to infrastructural development, education reforms, healthcare upgrades and security interventions.

However, Monday’s detention suggests that anti-graft agencies have moved beyond preliminary review to active interrogation.

Ribadu’s bugged phone

As the EFCC grilled the former governor over financial allegations, the Federal Government filed criminal charges against him before the Federal High Court in Abuja over alleged unlawful interception of the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu.

The three-count charge, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/99/2026 and filed under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024 and the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003, accused El-Rufai of admitting during a television interview that he and unnamed associates unlawfully intercepted Ribadu’s communications.

According to the charge sheet, the alleged admission was made on February 13, 2026, when El-Rufai appeared as a guest on Arise TV’s Prime Time Programme in Abuja.

In Count One, the Federal Government alleged that El-Rufai “did admit during the interview that you and your cohorts unlawfully intercepted the phone communications of the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu,” an offence said to be contrary to and punishable under Section 12(1) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.

Count Two accused him of stating during the same interview that he knew and was associated with an individual who unlawfully intercepted the NSA’s phone communications without reporting the person to relevant security agencies, contrary to Section 27(b) of the Act.

Count Three alleged that El-Rufai and others still at large, sometime in 2026 in Abuja, used technical equipment or systems that compromised public safety and national security by unlawfully intercepting Ribadu’s phone communications, an offence punishable under Section 131(2) of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003.

The prosecution claimed that the alleged act, which the defendant reportedly admitted to during the television interview, instilled “reasonable apprehension of insecurity among Nigerians.”

No date had been fixed for his arraignment as of press time.

The criminal charges stem directly from El-Rufai’s appearance on Arise TV last Friday, where he claimed he learnt of an alleged plan to arrest him through a leaked conversation from the NSA’s phone.

“Ribadu made the call, because we listened to their calls. The government thinks that they are the only ones who listen to calls. But we also have our ways. He made the call, he gave the order that they should arrest me.

“That technically is illegal. I know, but the government does it all the time. They listen to our calls all the time without a court order. But someone tapped his phone and told us that he gave the order,” he said.

The disclosure sent shockwaves through political and security circles, with analysts warning that if substantiated, the interception could amount to a grave breach of national security protocol.

Presidential aides were quick to react. The Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, accused El-Rufai of attempting to create political tension and divert attention from corruption allegations in Kaduna State.

He wrote that the former governor’s actions were meant to “create political tension in the country, create an atmosphere of fear and unrest, and then damage the government through deliberate misinformation” and “divert attention from his domestic problems in Kaduna State, where he is facing massive corruption allegations.”

In Nigeria, unauthorised phone tapping is a serious offence.

According to the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act 2015, offenders can face up to 10 years imprisonment, fines of up to N10m or both.

Under Section 12 on unauthorised interception, individuals who illegally intercept non-public communications (phone calls, emails, etc.) face a prison term of up to two years, a fine of up to N5m or both.

Recent interpretations, however, suggest that in cases involving related, more serious access offences, penalties could be extended to five years.

Unauthorised recording of private conversations, on the other hand, can lead to up to two years in prison while failure to report an illegal interception can lead to charges under the Act.

Dadiyata case reopened

In a parallel development, the Department of State Services has reopened investigations into the 2019 disappearance of Abubakar Idris, popularly known as Dadiyata, and has begun probing El-Rufai and his sons over the case.

Dadiyata, a lecturer at the Federal University Dutsinma, Katsina State, was declared missing on August 1, 2019, after gunmen reportedly took him from his residence in Kaduna. His whereabouts remain unknown nearly seven years later.

A security source told The PUNCH that the DSS recently seized El-Rufai’s passport at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, to prevent him from travelling abroad while investigations are ongoing.

“The DSS has reopened the case of the 2019 disappearance in Kaduna of a renowned government critic, Abubakar Idris, better known as Dadiyata, and several other cases of missing persons.

“El’Rufai is fully aware that the DSS is investigating him and his two sons for Dadiyata’s kidnapping. That was why he rushed to the ARISE news channel to cook up stories about (Umar) Ganduje and the confessions of a ghost police officer, all in a bid to divert attention.

“He is aware of the security implications of seizing his passport. He knows he can’t officially leave the country, which is very bad for him. Several laws place a responsibility on citizens to assist with crime reporting and prevention.

“Section 123 of the Criminal Code Act prohibits the willful destruction or concealment of evidence, while the Criminal Code Act and the Penal Code, applicable to Kaduna State, deals with covering up treason, destroying evidence, or aiding suspects,” the source said.

Another source said investigators were examining social media posts made by El-Rufai’s sons, Bello and Bashir, following Dadiyata’s disappearance.

“Former governor El’Rufai claimed that until Dadiyata’s disappearance he didn’t know that anybody with such a name existed. However, social media posts by his sons, Bello and Bashir, suggest otherwise. Posts by his sons on ‘X’ clearly showed that Dadiyata was a problem for their family.

“That is why Bello and Bashir will be invited along with their father to help in our investigations,” the source added.

El-Rufai has maintained publicly that he neither knew Dadiyata personally nor had any reason to target him, insisting that the missing lecturer was a critic of the Kano State Government at the time.

Abuja, Kaduna protests

Monday’s developments triggered street actions in both Abuja and Kaduna.

At the EFCC headquarters, hundreds of demonstrators under the aegis of the Mega National Movement for Good Governance stormed the commission’s premises, demanding a thorough probe into the alleged N432bn corruption case.

Carrying placards with inscriptions such as “Answer the charges El-Rufai” and “El-Rufai not above the law,” the protesters attempted to march into the commission’s premises but were stopped by security operatives.

Addressing journalists, the group’s spokesman, Muhammad Abdullahi, said, “We reiterate its firm position that the ongoing prosecution of former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, remains a lawful and constitutional matter strictly between him and the Government of Kaduna State. This issue should not be reduced to a mere political drama or emotional manipulation.

“It is a question of accountability and stewardship of public trust. The Kaduna State House of Assembly Ad-Hoc Committee Report (2024) raised serious concerns regarding financial management, public debt profile, and contract procedures under the previous administration.

“It is also a matter of public record that some former appointees and close allies — including Jafaru Sani, Jimmy Lawal, Bashir Saidu, and Samuel Aruwa — are already in custody or undergoing investigation in connection with these allegations.”

He added, “We emphasise that this is not about persecution; it is about prosecution grounded in law. The courtroom remains the proper venue for vindication. If El-Rufai is confident in his integrity, he should allow the judicial process to run its full course. Let integrity, not rhetoric, determine the outcome.”

Responding, EFCC spokesman Dele Oyewale said, “The EFCC recognises the right of Nigerians to lawful protest… As far as the EFCC is concerned, the right thing will be done. Our processes and procedures will be followed.”

At the same time, El-Rufai’s supporters gathered near the commission, chanting solidarity songs and holding placards reading, “El-Rufai is a citizen, not a subject” and “We stand with El-Rufai. We stand for law.”

In Kaduna, hundreds of protesters under the Coalition of Civil Society Organisations stormed the State House of Assembly demanding updates on the legislative probe.

“We are here to ask a legitimate question on behalf of the people: What progress has been made in the ongoing legislative probe, and what steps are being taken to ensure that justice is not delayed?” said Aliyu Muhammad, one of the conveners.

Responding, Speaker Yusuf Dahiru Leman said, “We share your pains and stand by our documented findings… Anybody found wanting will face the full wrath of the law. No one is above the law.”

Victims demand accountability

Adding another layer to the crisis, a coalition of terror victims in Kaduna State issued a statement calling for accountability over alleged human rights abuses during El-Rufai’s eight-year tenure.

The statement was signed on behalf of the victims by human rights defenders, including former chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, Professor Chidi Odinkalu.

He said, “We speak today (Monday) as representatives of countless individuals, families, and communities who endured eight years of profound hardship, terror, fear, and loss under the governorship of Nasir El-Rufai in Kaduna State (2015–2023).

“Our sole demand is accountability under the rule of law: thorough, independent investigations; prosecutions where evidence warrants; and closure for traumatized victims and families.”

The coalition cited cases, including the abduction and killing of Dr. Maiwada Galadima and the disappearance of Dadiyata, insisting that justice must be pursued.

Opposition reacts

The arrest and charges have drawn sharp reactions from opposition figures.

The National Publicity Secretary of the New Nigeria People’s Party, Ladipo Johnson, said, “I expect that there will be more of this drama towards the 2027 elections. They haven’t even investigated the matter. The FG is probably acting on his open admission. It will also depend on whether he meant what he said or not.

“But I felt they should have invited him before making a statement on the matter.”

The Interim National Chairman of the Labour Party, Senator Nenadi Usman, also shared a similar sentiment.

Usman spoke through her media aide, Ken Asogwa.

She said, “I think the Federal Government is taking the legal means to get him to explain the source of his stories.

“But I am surprised that the Federal Government went ahead to file charges without inviting him first to shed more light on the source of the information he gave out. What it means is that the Federal Government is already indicting him.”

Tinubu hails Ribadu

President Bola Tinubu on Monday praised Nuhu Ribadu, describing him as an illustrious son of Adamawa State who is “honest, bold, courageous and committed.”

Tinubu, who spoke at the Adamawa State Government House in Yola during a one-day visit, declared that Ribadu, “a son of the soil”, was doing “an excellent job” in the fight against terrorism and banditry, and vowed that together they would defeat the nation’s security threats.

“With you (Ribadu), we will defeat the bandits and terrorists.

“You’re a good National Security Adviser; honest, bold, courageous and committed to the job.

“I believe the state of Adamawa is strongly, strongly proud of you, because I am too,” the President said.

Tinubu’s declaration came days after El-Rufai, in a letter dated January 30, 2026, accused the ONSA of procuring approximately 10 kilogrammes of thallium sulphate, a colourless, odourless and highly toxic compound capable of causing death even in small doses, from a supplier in Poland.

In the letter titled “Request for Clarification on the Procurement of Thallium Sulphate,” El-Rufai demanded that Ribadu explain the purpose of the chemical, its storage arrangements, and whether NAFDAC and the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control were notified.

ONSA, in a response dated February 13, 2026 and signed by Brigadier-General O.M. Adesuyi on behalf of the NSA, denied procuring or initiating any purchase of thallium sulphate, and referred the allegation to the Department of State Services for investigation.

The unfolding developments represent one of the most consequential legal and political confrontations involving a former governor in recent years.

Once a key figure within the ruling establishment and a prominent voice in national policy debates, El-Rufai now faces simultaneous investigations into alleged financial impropriety, cybercrime and a reopened disappearance case.

The convergence of EFCC detention, fresh criminal charges, DSS investigations and street protests underscores the high stakes.

Whether the cases ultimately amount to lawful prosecution grounded in evidence or political persecution, as his allies allege, will likely be tested in the courtroom.

 For now, the former governor remains in EFCC custody, his political future hanging in the balance as Nigeria inches closer to another election cycle.

Two members of the House of Representatives have expressed differing views on Senator Ali Ndume’s recent call for the deployment of United States troops to Nigeria amid worsening insecurity in the North-East.

Speaking on Friday as a guest on Channels Television’s Politics Today, Ndume had endorsed the deployment of US soldiers to Borno State to assist in combating insurgency and banditry.

“The fact that the Americans are now helping us fight insurgency is a welcome development. We have been looking for this support for a long time and have made many efforts to get it, but have failed.

“Now that we have this window of opportunity, we must utilise it. I have complained many times that our major setback in this fight is a lack of certain resources; now, America has agreed to provide those resources free of charge,” he said.

Speaking with The PUNCH, the Chairman of the House Committee on Defence, Babajimi Benson, emphasised the importance of understanding the role of the 200 US troops currently in Nigeria.

“The issue is not additional or fewer numbers, but what role and capabilities they are bringing to support the Armed Forces of Nigeria. At present, we are focused on training and technology enablers that would enhance our capacities to defeat the adversary,” he said.

He added, “Would those opposed to such efforts prefer the nation continue to haemorrhage from insecurity, terrorism, banditry, and ceaseless kidnapping?

“Our position would therefore be that if there is a needed capacity gap to fill, then by all means, let it be provided. If not, then no need for more.”

Taking a different stance, Kano lawmaker and House Committee Chairman on Air Force, Alhassan Rurum, said a well-equipped and properly funded Nigerian Armed Forces could defeat terrorism independently.

“I’m not in support of the American Army deployment to Nigeria. Our Armed Forces are capable of handling our security challenges. We only need to properly fund and provide modern equipment for them,” he said.

MBF backs Ndume

On Sunday, the Middle Belt Forum expressed support for Ndume’s proposal, urging US troops to act professionally in operations against terrorists, bandits, and insurgents.

The National President of MBF, Dr Bitrus Pogu, said that while the proposal was positive, the US government must carefully consider intelligence and the operational environment.

“One important thing is about intelligence, and I think they are already getting that intel. They also have to study those who have been sent to assess the situation carefully,” Pogu said.

He warned that internal compromise within Nigerian security forces could challenge foreign troop operations.

“A foreign army will find it very difficult to operate. So, if they are going to do it together with the soldiers or the police on the ground, a lot of study and intelligence must first be made available through those who have come earlier,” he said.

Pogu suggested ways US troops could assist, such as providing air support while Nigerian forces handle ground operations.

“For instance, the advice can be that our troops do the ground work while the foreign troops concentrate on the air, given their technological advantage.

“The ultimate goal is to flush out terrorists and restore peace across the country. What we are after is to flush the terrorists out and have peace in Nigeria. So, I’m in support,” he said.

The forum also urged expanded security collaboration, including more troops, enhanced weapons systems, and strengthened intelligence sharing between Nigeria and the US.

“There is a very disturbing rise in the subversive activities of terrorists across the Middle Belt.

“Communities are being attacked with alarming frequency, lives are being lost, and thousands are displaced. At a time when Nigeria has entered into a defence cooperation understanding with the US, it is troubling that terrorists appear emboldened, almost as if mocking that partnership,” said Luka Binniyat, the forum’s spokesman.

“If foreign military support will help degrade terror networks, improve intelligence gathering, and restore confidence to vulnerable communities, then it should be welcomed.

“The security and survival of our people must come first. The Middle Belt cannot afford hesitation in confronting terror in all its forms,” he added.

ACF seeks clarity

The Arewa Consultative Forum said it had not yet taken a firm position on Ndume’s call, noting that key details of the proposed US military involvement remained unclear.

“ACF is worried that full details of the US military involvement are yet to be made public, which is a cause for concern.

“Perhaps Distinguished Senator Ndume knows more than the ordinary citizens. There are legal and constitutional implications, such as the need for the National Assembly’s approval, because it involves foreign military forces acting in Nigeria’s territory,” said National Publicity Secretary of ACF, Prof Tukur Muhammad-Baba.

Northern Christians endorse support

The Forum of Northern Christians and the Federal Capital Territory, led by Chairman Joseph Hayab, expressed support for Ndume’s proposal.

“There is nothing wrong with the US backing Nigeria to save the country from terrorist attacks,” he said.

Hayab emphasised that the primary concern was protecting lives and property, adding, “Any partnership that would effectively address insecurity should be embraced.”

CNG expresses mixed stance

The Coalition of Northern Groups, Gombe State Chairman, Mohammed Deba, said his organisation was partially supportive but highlighted concerns over foreign intervention.

“Recently, we supported other African countries in maintaining peace. So why can’t we solve our security issues?

“Technically, we are in support, and then again we are not in support,” he said.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM