Connect with us

News

US sanctions eight Nigerians over links to Boko Haram, cybercrime

Published

on

The United States has frozen the assets and properties of eight Nigerians accused of having links to the Islamic sect, Boko Haram, and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

This was contained in a 3,000-page document dated February 10, released by the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and sighted by the correspondent on Monday.

The document also identified individuals sanctioned for cybercrime-related offences and other security threats.

The pronouncement comes on the heels of recent recommendations by the US Congress for visa bans and asset freezes on persons and groups accused of violations of religious freedom and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

The former Governor of Kano State, Rabiu Kwankwaso; the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria; and Miyetti Allah Kautal were recommended by United States lawmakers for visa bans and asset freezes.

The OFAC document, titled “Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List,” detailed individuals of other nationalities and entities whose assets had been frozen, serving as a reference tool.

It also provided notice of actions taken against Specially Designated Nationals, whose property and interests were blocked as part of counter-terrorism efforts.

According to OFAC, the move forms part of its broader efforts to block the property and interests of Specially Designated Nationals and prevent financial dealings with them.

“This publication of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control is designed as a reference tool providing actual notice of actions by OFAC with respect to Specially Designated Nationals and other persons (which term includes both individuals and entities) whose property is blocked, to assist the public in complying with the various sanctions programmes administered by OFAC,” the agency said.

See also  SEE FULL LIST: IG deploys new AIGs, CPs in major police re-organisation

Among those listed is Salih Yusuf Adamu, also known as Salihu Yusuf, born on August 23, 1990, in Nigeria. Yusuf was identified as having ties to Boko Haram and was reported to hold a Nigerian passport.

Yusuf was among six Nigerians convicted in 2022 for setting up a Boko Haram cell in the United Arab Emirates to raise funds for insurgents in Nigeria. The six men were convicted in the UAE for attempting to send $782,000 from Dubai to Nigeria.

Another individual, Babestan Oluwole Ademulero, born on March 4, 1953, in Nigeria, was designated under SDNTK sanctions. He appeared under several aliases, including Wole A. Babestan and Olatunde Irewole Shofeso.

Also designated was Abu Abdullah ibn Umar Al-Barnawi, also known as Ba Idrisa. He was reportedly born between 1989 and 1994 in Maiduguri, Borno State, and was flagged under terrorism-related sanctions.

Abu Musab Al-Barnawi, also referred to as Habib Yusuf, was listed with varying birth years between 1990 and 1995. He was identified as a Boko Haram leader and sanctioned under terrorism provisions.

Khaled (or Khalid) Al-Barnawi, whose name appeared twice in the publication, was born in 1976 in Maiduguri, Nigeria. He was linked to Boko Haram and listed under several aliases, including Abu Hafsat and Mohammed Usman.

Ibrahim Ali Alhassan, born January 31, 1981, in Nigeria, was listed with a Nigerian passport. He was reported to reside in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, and was linked to Boko Haram.

Abu Bakr ibn Muhammad ibn Ali Al-Mainuki, also known as Abu-Bilal Al-Minuki, was born in 1982 in Mainok, Borno State. He was identified as having ties to ISIL.

See also  US expands travel restrictions, adds Nigeria to list of countries

Nnamdi Orson Benson, born March 21, 1987, in Nigeria, was listed under CYBER2 sanctions and was reported to hold a Nigerian passport.

The inclusion of these names in the OFAC list highlights Washington’s continued focus on countering terrorism financing and cyber threats.

The sanctions mean that all property and interests of these individuals within US jurisdiction are blocked, and US persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

Nigerians listed under the US Treasury sanctions face asset freezes under Executive Order 13224.

The United States officially designated Boko Haram a foreign terrorist organisation in 2013. According to the US State Department, the group is responsible for numerous attacks in the northern and northeastern regions of the country, as well as in the Lake Chad Basin in Cameroon, Chad, and Niger, that have killed thousands of people since 2009.

The US Secretary of State determines countries that have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism.

Such countries are designated under three laws: Section 1754(c) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act, and Section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.

In October 2025, for the second time, US President Donald Trump announced that Nigeria would be added to the US Department of State’s list of “Countries of Particular Concern.”

Trump, in a post on X, explained that Nigeria would be placed on a religious freedom watchlist, alleging that Christians were facing persecution and being killed by Muslims.

Nigeria was first designated as a Country of Particular Concern in 2020 under President Trump, but former President Joe Biden removed Nigeria from the list shortly after assuming office.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ICPC disowns viral ₦50bn bribe video, warns of legal action

Published

on

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has dismissed as false a viral video alleging a ₦50 billion bribery scandal, describing the content as fabricated and, in parts, artificially generated to mislead the public.

In a statement issued on Monday, the commission said the video, which has been widely circulated online, has no connection whatsoever to the agency and does not reflect any ongoing investigation.

“The images, names, and content in the video are fabricated and, in some instances, AI-generated, designed solely to mislead unsuspecting members of the public,” said ICPC spokesperson J. Okor Odey.

The anti-corruption body stressed that it has not issued any report or statement backing the claims in the video, including the alleged involvement of any individual, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, group of lawyers, or judicial officer.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the ICPC is not investigating any individual, SAN, group of lawyers, or judicial officer in connection with the fictitious ₦50 billion bribe referenced in the video. No such case, transaction, or investigation exists within the records of the commission,” the statement added.

The commission warned those behind the production and circulation of the video to cease immediately, vowing to take decisive legal action against perpetrators.

“The ICPC will not tolerate the misuse of its name and institutional credibility to spread disinformation in the name of ‘content creation”, Odey said, adding that those responsible “will face serious legal consequences.”

The agency urged members of the public to disregard the video and rely only on its official communication channels for verified information, reiterating its commitment to “credible, evidence-based investigations in line with the law.”

See also  US expands travel restrictions, adds Nigeria to list of countries

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

IG restructures Police Monitoring Unit, appoints new head

Published

on

The Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, has approved the restructuring of the Police Monitoring Unit as part of efforts to strengthen discipline and improve operational efficiency within the Nigeria Police Force.

The Force Public Relations Officer, Anthony Placid, disclosed this in a statement on Monday in Abuja.

He said the move was part of ongoing reforms aimed at refocusing the unit on its core mandate and enhancing oversight across commands and formations.

“As part of the reorganisation, the unit has been streamlined and strengthened to enhance proactive monitoring, intelligence-driven inspections, and real-time oversight of police personnel and operations across Commands, Formations, and Departments.

“The restructured framework also harmonises key investigative and monitoring functions in line with the force’s reform agenda,” he said.

He said the initiative was targeted at promoting professionalism, discipline and accountability within the force.

He added that the Monitoring Unit would play a central role in identifying operational lapses, enforcing standards, and ensuring accountability at all levels.

As part of the changes, the IG approved a leadership transition, appointing Aliyu Abubakar, a Deputy Commissioner of Police, as head of the restructured unit.

Abubakar previously served as Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of the State Criminal Investigation Department in both the Federal Capital Territory and Rivers State.

He said Abubakar played critical roles in high-profile investigations where he worked closely with state leadership to modernise investigative techniques and strengthen operational effectiveness.

NAN

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  Banks sent pretty ladies to woo me for deposits – Otedola
Continue Reading

News

Forensic report reveals Amupitan has no X account, says INEC

Published

on

All the alleged posts, replies, or statements attributed to Prof. Joash Amupitan, Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), on X (Twitter) are fraudulent, forensically unverifiable, technically impossible, and part of a coordinated disinformation campaign, an independent forensic investigation report has revealed.

The report conclusively established that he does not operate any personal X (Twitter) account.

In a detailed forensic report released on Monday by INEC, investigators identified several anomalies. According to the report, one of the most critical pieces of evidence was a timestamp anomaly.

The alleged reply credited to the fake account was posted 13 minutes before the original tweet it supposedly responded to, a scenario described as technically impossible on any digital platform. This finding strongly indicates digital manipulation.

Investigators carried out extensive verification using platform recovery tools, email linkage checks, and phone number analysis.

The findings confirmed that there is no connection between the fake X account and Prof. Amupitan’s verified email or phone number. Claims based on BVN and OPay data were described as misleading and logically flawed. Data breach records circulated online were also found to be unrelated and lacked any direct link to the alleged account.

Further checks using the Wayback Machine showed no record of the account or its posts before April 2026, contradicting claims that it had been active since 2022. In addition, the alleged reply does not exist on the live X platform, reinforcing the conclusion that it was never posted.

INEC also disclosed that on the same day the screenshots went viral, the account was renamed from @joashamupitan to @sundayvibe00, set to private, and labelled a “Parody Account.” This sequence of actions was identified as a deliberate attempt to erase digital traces and evade detection.

See also  Economic recovery has begun – Edun

The investigation uncovered a broader impersonation network, including multiple fake Facebook and Instagram accounts using Prof. Amupitan’s identity, recycled profile images across platforms, and systematic misuse of publicly available personal data. INEC concluded that the incident is part of a coordinated effort to manipulate public perception.

The Commission urged Nigerians and media organisations to verify social media content before sharing, emphasising that viral content is not necessarily authentic. It also highlighted the growing risks posed by artificial intelligence and digital manipulation.

The case has been referred to law enforcement agencies for further investigation and possible prosecution under Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act. Authorities are expected to trace those responsible for creating and circulating the fake content.

INEC reiterated that all official communications are issued only through its verified platforms, adding that any account claiming to represent Prof. Amupitan in a personal capacity should be treated as fraudulent unless officially confirmed.

Providing background to the report, Adedayo Oketola, Chief Press Secretary/Media Adviser to the INEC Chairman, recalled that on 10 April 2026, Prof. Amupitan’s attention was drawn to posts and screenshots on social media claiming he operated an X (Twitter) account (@joashamupitan) and made a partisan post (“Victory is sure”) in reply to @dayoisreal.

He said shortly after, more screenshots appeared online showing emails, phone numbers, OPay, and BVN verification data, and data breach records linking Prof. Amupitan to the X (Twitter) account. These records were widely shared across traditional and online media as corroborating proof.

Oketola said after discovering the disinformation, Prof. Amupitan, through him, issued an official statement to debunk the falsehood and clearly stated that he had never owned or operated an X (Twitter) account.

See also  Insecurity: Northern forum demands service chiefs’ removal

Thereafter, he said INEC committed to a full forensic investigation and commissioned an independent forensic cybersecurity expert, who conducted a multi-layered forensic and digital investigation using X platform data, internet archive records, OSINT tools, identity forensics, and cross-platform analysis.

“A combination of INEC’s internal review and the independent investigations by digital forensic and cybersecurity experts have reached the same conclusion with high confidence. The forensic evidence is comprehensive, multi-sourced, and unambiguous. The posts attributed to Prof. Amupitan on X are fabricated. The account is a clear case of impersonation, and the surrounding activity points to a coordinated disinformation effort intended to manipulate public perception. One of the independent investigators described it as ‘a coordinated digital impersonation and disinformation campaign,” the statement read in part.

tribuneonline.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending