Connect with us

Business

US-Iran war: Marketers, Dangote trade words over petrol price

Published

on

Amid the escalating tensions in the Middle East, data from the Major Energies Marketers Association of Nigeria has shown that a litre of imported petrol is about N64 cheaper than the one produced by the Dangote Petroleum Refinery.

However, the refinery debunked the report, challenging importers to defy the ongoing airstrikes in the Middle East and bring in petroleum products.

The PUNCH reported on Monday that the Dangote refinery increased its gantry price from N774 to N874. The adjustment followed a jump in oil prices to $84 per barrel, up from below $70, days before the airstrikes involving the United States, Iran, Israel, and other countries.

Following the increment, filling stations on Tuesday raised their pump prices to as high as N937, depending on the location. Before the Middle East crisis deepened over the weekend, some filling stations had already been selling petrol at prices ranging between N812 and N839, but the crisis disrupted the global fuel market, affecting Nigeria and other countries.

However, data by MEMAN indicated that Dangote’s petrol gantry price was N874 per litre as of Monday, while the landing cost of imported petrol was N809.37 per litre, showing a difference of about N64 between the two sources.

MEMAN also reported that Dangote’s diesel price was N1,169.42, while imported diesel was N1,125.70 per litre.

However, officials of the Dangote refinery, who did not want to be mentioned because of the sensitivity of the matter, said some importers were projecting a false narrative to ensure the Federal Government continues to issue import licences.

“Anybody can go to Apapa to get the landing cost, and anybody who likes should go to Iran and import. Some people just want us to depend on imports. Isn’t it time we ended that dependence on foreign products?

“Some people want importation to continue, and that’s not normal. You keep importing what can be produced locally. Is that a good thing? How do you expect our children to survive? Nigerians will import and destroy what we have locally,” an official said.

Aside from pricing, another official said Nigeria should be thankful to the Dangote refinery for shielding the country from the fuel crisis that could have paralysed commercial activities.

“Let’s think about what could have happened to Nigeria if we didn’t have a refinery in Nigeria at this time. Assuming there is no Dangote refinery in Nigeria, economic activities would have been paralysed by now.

“Many countries are not so lucky, and they are now facing long queues at filling stations. Dangote has saved Nigeria from that fuel crisis. This has taught us that there’s nothing like one’s country, and we must always be prepared,” he said.

In its report, MEMAN explained that the downstream sector saw a major upward price adjustment on Monday, driven by the Dangote refinery raising its gantry price by N100, bringing it to N874 per litre.

The shift, triggered by rising global crude costs, pushed retail pump prices above N900 per litre. Many private depots reportedly paused sales briefly to recalibrate their pricing in response.

“The market is currently in a state of high uncertainty. With Brent crude climbing above $80/bbl due to escalating geopolitical tensions (specifically the US-Israel-Iran conflict), analysts warn that the cost of petrol remains under significant pressure. If crude prices continue toward the $90/bbl mark, domestic pump prices could potentially reach N1,100 by next month,” MEMAN said.

See also  Job losses loom as more Inland Container Terminals shut down

On Wednesday, motorists flocked to petrol stations across Britain in a scramble for fuel as fears of a new oil crisis caused by the Iran war grew, according to a report by The Mirror UK.

Frustrated drivers complained on Wednesday about UK petrol stations running out of fuel and long queues at forecourts after hostilities erupted in the Middle East. Prices have risen by as much as 11 pence per litre in some locations.

In contrast, Nigeria relies on the Dangote refinery for an adequate fuel supply amid the geopolitical tensions. Petrol prices in Nigeria surged on Tuesday, but no queues were reported at filling stations. Analysts attribute this to the Dangote refinery reducing Nigeria’s dependence on imported fuel.

Commentators highlight the Dangote refinery’s role in shielding Nigeria from such disruptions. “Imagine a Nigeria without a refinery; we would be experiencing endless queues, black market prices, businesses slowing down, and an economy held hostage by fuel scarcity.

“Today, we stand at a turning point. The Dangote Petroleum Refinery & Petrochemicals is more than steel and pipes — it is energy security, economic power, job creation, and national pride,” an industry player who spoke in confidence stated.

During a recent meeting with refiners and stakeholders, the Dangote refinery assured them of sufficient fuel supply, though it noted challenges from insufficient crude, requiring some reliance on foreign feedstock.

The PUNCH reports that Dangote outpaced importers to supply approximately 62 per cent of the nation’s petrol in January 2026.

This development, revealed in the fact sheet from the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, signals a growing reliance on domestic refining capabilities and a potential reduction in the country’s longstanding dependence on fuel imports.

According to the NMDPRA’s State of the Downstream Sector report for January 2026, the total average daily supply of petrol reached 64.9 million litres per day in January.

Of this volume, receipts from domestic refineries — primarily driven by Dangote, the only petrol-producing refinery at the moment — accounted for 40.1 million litres per day, while imports by oil marketing companies and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited stood at 24.8 million litres per day.

This marked the first time in the 13-month period covered by the report (from January 2025 to January 2026) that domestic production had exceeded imports, reversing a trend where foreign supplies often dominated the market.

The NMDPRA attributed the surge in domestic output directly to “improvement in supply from DPRP” — the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals — which increased its PMS contributions from 32 million litres per day in December 2025 to 40.1 million litres per day in January 2026.

Crude supply denial

Meanwhile, the Dangote refinery has said that local crude producers are refusing to supply feedstock to its facility, forcing it to rely more on imported crude. In a statement on Thursday, the refinery defended its recent N100 increase in the gantry price of petrol.

While reassuring Nigerians of its unwavering commitment to serving as a stabilising force amid recent shocks in the international oil market, the refinery said the conflict in the Middle East has led to the shutdown of some refineries and cutbacks in refinery production across the world.

See also  INEC seeks nearly N1tn for 2027 elections

This, it said, is leading to a global scarcity of petroleum products, as China has banned the export of gasoline and diesel. “The Dangote refinery will ensure that Nigeria is insulated from these supply shocks by prioritising supply to the domestic market. This is one of the many benefits of domestic refining,” it said.

According to the statement, the conflict in the Middle East has driven global crude and freight prices sharply higher, with benchmark Brent prices rising by about 26 per cent within a short period to above $84 per barrel.

In response, the refinery implemented a measured adjustment of N100 per litre in its ex-depot price of petrol, representing an increase of about 12 per cent.

The refinery said it has absorbed 20 per cent of the cost escalation for now to cushion the domestic market, despite continuing to source crude at prevailing international market prices, whether purchased locally or from foreign suppliers.

“It is worth noting that Nigerian crude oil is more expensive than the Brent benchmark price by $3 to $6 per barrel. After adding freight of $3.50 per barrel, crude oil will be landing in our tanks between $88 and $91 per barrel. For context, crude oil was landing in our tanks at about $68 per barrel when our ex-depot price was N774/litre,” the refinery stated.

According to the company, the refinery receives five cargoes every month from the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited instead of 13 cargoes, adding that the cargoes are paid for at international market prices.

“Furthermore, while we receive about five cargoes a month from NNPC, which we pay for in naira, these cargoes are priced at international market prices plus premium and fall short of the 13 cargoes which we require to support sales into Nigeria. We, therefore, end up procuring foreign exchange at open market rates to pay for crude cargoes purchased from local and international traders.

“The high crude cost is compounded by the fact that Nigeria’s upstream producers have failed to supply crude oil to the refinery as required under the Petroleum Industry Act, forcing us to source a substantial portion through international traders who charge an additional premium,” it stated.

As a private enterprise operating in a deregulated environment, the Dangote refinery added that it has remained responsive and has made significant sacrifices by aligning pricing with market realities to ensure sustainability, particularly as it sources all its crude at prevailing international market prices, whether locally or from foreign suppliers.

“Selling below cost would undermine its ability to procure crude, sustain production, and guarantee uninterrupted supply to Nigerians. Despite these pressures, local refining at this scale continues to reduce exposure to international supply disruptions, moderate foreign exchange demand, and protect the country from severe shortages during periods of global instability,” the refinery added.

The refinery said it is also accelerating the deployment of compressed natural gas-powered trucks to cushion the impact of global shocks, enhance nationwide distribution efficiency, reduce logistics costs, and improve delivery timelines across the downstream sector.

See also  FG allays fears over tax reforms

“The rollout is scheduled to commence this month,” it announced, saying, “We remain committed to transparency, operational excellence, and the long-term objective of securing sustainable energy security and stability for Nigeria at an affordable cost.”

Efforts to get the reactions of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission, the agency in charge of the domestic crude supply obligation, were unsuccessful. The NUPRC spokesman, Eniola Akinkuotu, did not reply to messages sent to him.

Similarly, the spokesman of NNPC, Andy Odeh, declined to comment when contacted by our correspondent on Thursday.

Experts speak

Meanwhile, as Dangote and modular refineries demand sufficient crude supply in the face of low crude production, experts have called on the government and operators to ramp up production.

An energy expert, Professor Emeritus Wumi Iledare, said meeting oil production targets would depend far less on ambitious projections of the government and far more on practical and on-the-ground actions.

Iledare told The PUNCH that the government must prioritise improved security around oil assets, reduce operational disruptions, fast-track regulatory approvals, and create a stable operating environment that allows existing fields to produce at full capacity.

According to Iledare, Nigeria earned about N55tn from crude oil in 2025, up from roughly N50tn in 2024. “While this is an improvement, it still fell short of what the Federal Government expected for the year,” he said. The don noted that the main issue was not oil prices but production.

He explained that the government planned to produce 766.5 million barrels in 2025 but managed to get only about 599.6 million barrels, saying that means close to 167 million barrels were not produced, and the revenue that could have come with them was lost.

“Looking ahead to 2026, meeting oil production targets will depend far less on ambitious projections and far more on practical, on-the-ground actions. The government must prioritise improved security around oil assets, reduce operational disruptions, fast-track regulatory approvals, and create a stable operating environment that allows existing fields to produce at full capacity,” he stated.

He added that supporting investment in maintenance and infill drilling—while ensuring policy consistency—will be critical to converting planned barrels into actual barrels. The expert called on the Independent Petroleum Producers Group to lead the charge by reopening shut-in wells.

“In this regard, the IPPG holds a key role in near-term production expansion. With appropriate economic and policy incentives, re-entry into shut-in wells in the onshore and shallow-water basins could deliver meaningful production gains within the year,” Iledare explained.

A professor of economics, Segun Ajibola, said the crude production volume is dependent on several factors, many of which are beyond the immediate control of the government itself.

According to him, the government can deploy resources towards oil exploration, but the overall impact depends on technical cooperation by partners, the joint ventures, happenings in the global oil market, and the environmental conditions, among others.

Ajibola maintained that the Nigerian situation is somehow complex, as the key agency in charge, the NNPC, has been enmeshed in controversies over the period.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

FG, World Bank in talks over second-largest $1.25bn loan

Published

on

The Federal Government has stepped up engagement with the World Bank for a fresh $1.25bn loan to support economic reforms, job creation, and competitiveness, as findings by The PUNCH showed that the facility has reached a critical stage in the lender’s approval process.

The proposed loan, titled Nigeria Actions for Investment and Jobs Acceleration, is expected to be presented for approval on June 26, 2026, about six months and 21 days before the January 16, 2027, presidential election, according to the revised timetable of the Independent National Electoral Commission.

If approved, the loan will rank as the second-largest single World Bank facility secured under President Bola Tinubu, behind only the $1.5bn Reforms for Economic Stabilisation to Enable Transformation Development Policy Financing approved in June 2024.

At an exchange rate of N1,361.4 to the dollar, the proposed $1.25bn facility translates to about N1.70tn, showing the scale of external financing being pursued by the Federal Government amid ongoing economic reforms.

If approved and fully disbursed without any delay, the proposed $1.25bn World Bank loan, equivalent to about N1.70tn at an exchange rate of N1,361.4/$, will raise Nigeria’s external debt from N74.43tn ($51.86bn) as of December 31, 2025, to at least N76.13tn ($53.11bn).

The country’s total public debt would also rise from N159.28tn to at least N160.98tn. In dollar terms, Nigeria’s total public debt could rise from $110.97bn to about $112.22bn if the facility is eventually approved and fully disbursed.

Details of the facility were contained in a World Bank Programme Information Document obtained by The PUNCH on Monday, which showed that the loan has progressed beyond the initial concept and appraisal phases.

Crucially, The PUNCH confirmed that the operation is now at the decision meeting stage of the World Bank’s project cycle, a point at which the lender’s management reviews the final appraisal package and determines whether the project should proceed to the Board of Executive Directors for approval.

This stage typically comes after appraisal and negotiations have been substantially concluded, meaning that key policy actions, financing terms, and reform commitments have already been agreed in principle between the borrower and the World Bank team.

In the World Bank process, the decision meeting represents a near-final internal clearance, after which the project is prepared for formal Board consideration, where final approval is granted.

Supporting this position, the World Bank document stated, “The review did authorise the team to appraise and negotiate,” indicating that the project has successfully passed earlier internal checks and is advancing toward final approval.

The borrower is listed as the Federal Republic of Nigeria, while the Federal Ministry of Finance will serve as the implementing agency.

According to the World Bank, the loan is designed “to support the government’s efforts to expand access to finance, digital, and electricity services, and strengthen competitiveness through tax, trade, and agriculture reforms.”

The fresh borrowing move comes amid growing scrutiny of Nigeria’s rising reliance on multilateral financing under Tinubu. Findings showed that the World Bank has approved about $9.35bn in loans and credits for Nigeria between June 2023 and May 2026.

See also  Nigeria’s inflation eased to 14.45% in November, says NBS

These approvals span multiple sectors, including power, education, healthcare, agriculture, social protection, renewable energy, MSME financing, and economic reform support. Key packages include the $2.25bn RESET and ARMOR reform financing in June 2024, $1.57bn for HOPE and SPIN programmes in September 2024, and $1.08bn for education and resilience programmes in March 2025.

If the proposed $1.25bn facility is approved next month, total World Bank approvals under Tinubu would rise to about $10.6bn, reinforcing the bank’s role as a major external financier for Nigeria’s reform agenda.

However, The PUNCH observed that many of the approved loans are not immediately disbursed, as fund releases are tied to the fulfilment of specific policy and reform conditions, often resulting in delays.

Govt warns

The Accountant-General of the Federation, Dr Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, earlier warned that Nigeria may reject loan facilities from the World Bank if delays in approval and disbursement persist, saying prolonged timelines could undermine the country’s willingness to proceed with such arrangements.

The warning was contained in a press statement last week by the Director of Press and Public Relations at the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation, Bawa Mokwa.

Ogunjimi, who spoke in Abuja during a courtesy visit by a World Bank delegation led by Mrs Treed Lane, stressed that Nigeria expects timely processing of funding requests, given that the facilities are loans and not grants.

He said, “If approvals take more than six months, the Nigerian Government may no longer honour such arrangements,” highlighting concerns over bureaucratic delays in accessing development financing.

The AGF noted that as a responsible borrower, Nigeria should not be subjected to prolonged approval processes that could affect project execution timelines and broader development objectives. He therefore urged the World Bank to “expedite the approval and disbursement of project funds to Nigeria” to support the country’s priorities.

Ogunjimi emphasised that the loans carry repayment obligations, making it imperative that disbursement processes align with project schedules and fiscal planning frameworks.

However, the Senior External Affairs Officer at the World Bank, Mansir Nasir, earlier told The PUNCH that funds for projects financed by the institution were not disbursed at once but in instalments, depending on the nature of the project and financing instruments.

The PUNCH also reported that Nigeria’s debt to the World Bank rose by $2.08bn in one year to $19.89bn as of December 31, 2025, according to an analysis of external debt stock data released by the Debt Management Office.

The figure represents an 11.7 per cent increase from the $17.81bn owed to the global lender as of December 31, 2024. The World Bank debt comprises loans from the International Development Association and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

See also  FG allays fears over tax reforms

IDA provides concessional grants and loans to low-income countries, while IBRD provides financial products and policy advice mainly to middle-income and creditworthy developing countries.

DMO data showed that Nigeria’s IDA debt rose from $16.56bn in 2024 to $18.51bn in 2025, an increase of $1.94bn or 11.73 per cent. IBRD exposure also increased from $1.24bn to $1.38bn, representing an increase of $141.84m or 11.41 per cent.

The increase means World Bank loans accounted for 38.36 per cent of Nigeria’s total external debt stock of $51.86bn as of the end of 2025.

The proposed loan is aligned with the World Bank’s Country Partnership Framework and forms part of a broader package of interventions, including FINCLUDE, BRIDGE, AGROW, ARMOR, and DARES programmes.

According to the bank, the facility is expected to drive growth through multiple channels, including reduced food and input costs, improved agricultural productivity, expansion of digital services, deeper financial markets, increased private investment, improved electricity access, and stronger tax revenue mobilisation.

“The $1.25bn standalone operation builds on recent progress in restoring stability and underpins the Government’s shift toward an inclusive growth model,” the document stated.

Implementation of the programme will be coordinated by the Federal Ministry of Finance, working with key agencies including the Central Bank of Nigeria, Securities and Exchange Commission, National Agricultural Seed Council, Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, and the Ministry of Power.

However, it warned that the operation carries significant risks. “Overall, the risk to this DPF is assessed as high. Political and governance risks are elevated ahead of the 2027 elections, with pressures that could delay or reverse sensitive reforms,” the bank stated.

Economists speak

Economists warn that the rising loan pipeline, while potentially beneficial for long-term development, could deepen fiscal pressures if not matched with stronger domestic revenue mobilisation and prudent expenditure management.

Lagos-based economist, Adewale Abimbola, reacting to the rising World Bank commitments to Nigeria, said loans from multilateral institutions such as the World Bank are largely concessionary, with interest rates typically below market levels and longer repayment tenors

He noted that the critical question is not whether Nigeria should be borrowing, but whether the loans are structured and deployed effectively. “If it’s concessionary and tied to viable projects with medium-term revenue prospects, I don’t think it’s a bad idea,” Abimbola explained. “Borrowing isn’t bad; what matters is utilisation.”

He stressed that the economic impact of such loans depends on how well they are channelled into projects that can generate sustainable growth, strengthen revenue, and improve public services over time.

Development economist and CEO of CSA Advisory, Dr Aliyu Ilias, has expressed strong reservations about Nigeria’s rising debt profile amid rising World Bank loans.

While acknowledging that borrowing is not inherently bad for an economy, he questioned the rationale for taking on more debt at a time when the government claims to have higher revenues.

Ilias pointed out that, following the removal of the fuel subsidy, Tinubu had announced increased revenue inflows, further suggesting that the government should be able to fund projects without resorting to heavy borrowing.

See also  Court orders NNPC to disclose details of $3bn crude-for-cash loan

Economist and CEO of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, Dr Muda Yusuf, stressed that borrowing should always be backed by sound economic reasoning and clear development priorities.

Yusuf emphasised that the key issue is debt sustainability, which depends primarily on the country’s revenue capacity to service its obligations.

Without a strong cash flow to meet repayment schedules, he warned, Nigeria risks falling into a vicious cycle of borrowing to service existing loans, perpetuating fiscal vulnerability. He said it is essential that projects funded by loans directly support the economy’s capacity to repay.

According to him, Nigeria should be cautious with foreign loans due to the exchange rate risks they pose, noting that domestic debt is generally easier to manage. Excessive foreign borrowing, he warned, could put pressure on the country’s reserves and further weaken the exchange rate.

He stressed that a disciplined approach to debt sustainability will be crucial for Nigeria to avoid long-term fiscal distress.

Debt outlook fragile

Meanwhile, the Nigerian Economic Summit Group has warned that Nigeria’s debt outlook remains fragile despite signs of surface-level improvement, stressing that underlying fiscal pressures are still elevated and could worsen with continued borrowing.

In its Debt Burden Monitor report released on Monday, the NESG said while headline indicators suggest some stabilisation, the country’s debt position remains “a nuanced but concerning picture” as structural weaknesses persist beneath the surface.

The group noted that Nigeria’s Debt Burden Index declined to 70.9 points in 2024 from 83.6 points in 2023, which could give the impression that debt stress is easing. However, it cautioned that the improvement was largely driven by a temporary moderation in debt service pressures rather than any real strengthening of fiscal capacity.

It further pointed out that public debt-to-GDP rose to 40.6 per cent in 2024, reflecting continued reliance on borrowing to finance fiscal deficits and weak revenue generation, highlighting what it described as persistent fiscal vulnerability.

According to the NESG, recent data reinforces concerns, as the Debt Burden Index remained elevated and volatile throughout 2025, fluctuating within a high-stress range and ending the year at an estimated 79.2 points.

“This pattern indicates that debt pressure has not structurally eased but instead fluctuates within a high-stress band,” the report stated.

The group added that the seeming improvement in conventional debt ratios masks deeper structural imbalances, noting that valuation effects, rather than genuine fiscal strengthening, were responsible for the changes.

It warned that Nigeria has not yet made a decisive shift toward debt sustainability, stressing that the economy remains in what it described as a “high-risk fiscal environment”.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Business

Oil hits $104 as US-Iran peace deal fails

Published

on

Oil prices stood at $104 on Monday as the United States and Iran failed to agree on a deal to end the war in the Middle East.

US President Donald Trump said on Monday that a ceasefire with Iran was “on life support” after he rejected Tehran’s response to a US peace proposal, fuelling concerns of a resumption of hostilities in the 10-week-old conflict that has killed thousands and disrupted vital energy flows following heightened tensions around the Strait of Hormuz.

According to Reuters, days after the US floated a proposal aimed at reopening negotiations, Iran on Sunday released a response focused on ending the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, where US ally Israel is fighting Iran-backed Hezbollah militants. The response was swiftly rejected by Trump.

Asked where the ceasefire stands, Trump told reporters on Monday, “I would call it the weakest right now, after reading that piece of garbage they sent us. I didn’t even finish reading it,” he said.

In its response, Iran was said to have also demanded compensation for war damage, emphasised its sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, and called on the US to end its naval blockade, guarantee no further attacks, lift sanctions, and remove a ban on Iranian oil sales.

The US had proposed an end to fighting before starting talks on more contentious issues, including Iran’s nuclear programme.

Defending the stance, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, said, “Our demand is legitimate: demanding an end to the war, lifting the (US) blockade and piracy, and releasing Iranian assets that have been unjustly frozen in banks due to US pressure; safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz and establishing security in the region and Lebanon were other demands of Iran, which are considered a generous and responsible offer.”

See also  Pope warns of regional spillover from Israel-Iran war

Brent crude oil futures traded 2.7 per cent higher at around $104 a barrel as the deadlock kept the Strait of Hormuz under severe pressure. Before the war began on February 28, crude oil traded below $70 a barrel. The narrow waterway, used to carry one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas, has since become a central pressure point in the conflict.

Meanwhile, three tankers carrying crude exited the Strait of Hormuz last week and on Sunday, with trackers switched off to avoid Iranian attacks, shipping data from Kpler and LSEG showed on Monday, underscoring a rising trend affecting Middle East oil exports.

Two very large crude carriers, the Agios Fanourios I and the Kiara M, carrying 2 million barrels of Iraqi crude each, passed through the strait on Sunday, the data showed.

The Agios Fanourios I is heading to Vietnam to discharge its cargo at the Nghi Son Refinery and Petrochemical facility on May 26, the data showed. The tanker failed to transit the strait in at least two previous attempts since it loaded Basrah medium crude on April 17, Reuters reports.

Continue Reading

Business

NNPC, NUPRC remit N322bn, $116.9m after Tinubu order

Published

on

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited and the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission remitted over N322bn and $116.9m into the Federation Account within two months following the implementation of Executive Order 9 signed in February 2026, documents presented at the Federation Account Allocation Committee meetings have shown.

The documents, obtained from presentations made by both agencies at the March and April FAAC meetings, indicated that the remittances followed the Federal Government’s directive mandating the full transfer of crude oil and gas revenues into the Federation Account.

The document for January 2026 remittance was not uploaded by the committee.

Executive Order 9, signed by President Bola Tinubu in February 2026, was introduced to strengthen transparency, improve revenue accountability, and boost inflows into the Federation Account at a time the government is grappling with fiscal pressures and rising expenditure demands.

According to the directive, the President invoked Section 5 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended), anchored on Section 44(3), which vests ownership and control of all minerals, mineral oils, and natural gas in the Government of the Federation.

Tinubu said excessive deductions, overlapping funds, and structural distortions in the oil and gas sector had weakened remittances to the Federation Account and warned that the practice must end to protect national revenue.

“For too long, excessive deductions, overlapping funds, and structural distortions in the oil and gas sector have weakened remittances to the Federation Account. When revenues meant for federal, state, and local governments are trapped in layers of charges and retention mechanisms, development suffers. That must end,” he said on his verified X handle.

See also  Court orders NNPC to disclose details of $3bn crude-for-cash loan

Findings from the FAAC documents showed that the NNPC remitted a total of $29.28m and N42.64bn for March 2026 crude oil and gas receipts, which were shared in April 2026.

The national oil company stated in its presentation that “100 per cent of the total crude oil and gas receipts of $29,278,415.96 and N2,066,841,328.73 were remitted to the Federation in compliance with Executive Order 9 of February 2026.”

The document showed that the receipts came from multiple revenue streams, including Production Sharing Contract profits, crude oil exports, domestic crude sales to the Dangote Petroleum Refinery, gas receipts, and miscellaneous crude and gas earnings.

A breakdown of the March remittance indicated that crude oil export earnings accounted for $25.7m, while PSC profits contributed $3.52m. On the naira side, crude oil export proceeds stood at N37.67bn, while miscellaneous crude revenue amounted to N42.64bn. Gas revenue contributed N34.47m.

The document further showed that PSC profit inflows were split between the Federation Sub-Account and the Federation Account in line with the statutory sharing formula.

According to the presentation, the Federation Sub-Account received 60 per cent of PSC profits, amounting to $11.71m and N826.74m, while the Federation Account received 40 per cent valued at $17.57m and N1.24bn.

The total transfer for the month stood at $29.28m and N42.64bn.

Similarly, the NNPC disclosed that for February 2026 receipts shared in March 2026, it remitted 100 per cent of crude oil and gas earnings totalling $87.63m and N121.34bn to the Federation Account.

The document stated, “Federation Accounts: 100 per cent of the total crude oil and gas receipts of $87,629,089.84 and N1,957,563,915.65 were remitted to the Federation.” The February figures represent significantly higher inflows compared to March, reflecting stronger crude oil and gas revenue performance during the period.

See also  Tinubu clears 959 for national honours

The figures equal $87.63m, and N121.34bn remitted for February 2026 receipts shared in March, as well as $29.28m and N42.64bn remitted for March 2026 receipts shared in April.

The FAAC documents also showed that the NUPRC separately remitted N34.2bn in March 2026 as revenue collections from royalties, gas flare penalties, concession rentals, and miscellaneous oil revenue.

According to the commission’s presentation, the remittance was made in compliance with its statutory obligation to transfer all collectable upstream petroleum revenues into the Federation Account.

The document read, “This report is a summary of royalties (oil and gas), gas flared penalty, rents, and miscellaneous oil revenue collected by the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission and remitted to the Federation Account as statutorily mandated.”

A breakdown of the NUPRC collections showed that oil and gas royalties generated N18.69bn in March 2026, while gas flare penalties contributed N10.2bn. Miscellaneous oil revenue, which includes licences and permits, stood at N4.95bn, while concession rentals contributed N364.06m.

However, the March remittance represented a sharp decline when compared to the N124.4bn collected in February 2026. The documents attributed the decline mainly to lower royalty collections, which dropped from N104.31bn in February to N18.69bn in March, representing a decrease of N85.62bn.

Gas flare penalties also declined by N3.96bn during the period under review. The breakdown indicated that the commission generated N124.4bn in February 2026 and N34.2bn in March 2026.

The latest remittance figures underscore the Federal Government’s renewed push to improve oil revenue accountability amid concerns over leakages, under-remittances, and dwindling federation earnings.

The implementation of Executive Order 9 comes as the Federal Government intensifies efforts to stabilise public finances, improve crude oil production, and strengthen oversight across the petroleum value chain.

See also  Job losses loom as more Inland Container Terminals shut down

The development is also expected to boost monthly FAAC allocations to the three tiers of government at a time when many states are battling rising debt obligations, wage pressures, and infrastructure funding gaps.

Recall that the World Bank called for tighter and more explicit enforcement of Executive Order 9, urging the Federal Government to fully implement the directive by ending revenue deductions at source and migrating Ministries, Departments, and Agencies to budgetary funding.

In its latest Nigeria Development Update report, analysed by our correspondent on Thursday and titled “Nigeria’s Tomorrow Must Start Today: The Case for Early Childhood Development,” the bank said that while the order has already triggered notable improvements in revenue transparency, “further consolidation of recent gains” would depend on how rigorously its provisions are enforced across all government institutions.

According to the report, “Further consolidation of recent gains of Executive Order 9 will require rationalizing remaining cost-of-collection arrangements and transitioning MDA financing to transparent budget appropriations.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending