Connect with us

News

Rivers Assembly defends rejection of Fubara’s four nominees

Published

on

The Rivers State House of Assembly, on Monday, dropped four of the nine commissioner-nominees, including a professor, submitted by Governor Siminalayi Fubara for screening and confirmation.

The House, however, cleared five nominees as commissioners-designate after a rigorous screening process that lasted over two hours.

Speaker of the House, Martin Amaewhule, who presided over plenary on Monday, disclosed this in his summation after listening to motions moved and seconded by his colleagues concerning the nominees.

Amaewhule said the four nominees were dropped due to poor performance during the screening and controversies, including petitions surrounding their nominations.

“Distinguished colleagues, we have nine nominees forwarded to this Assembly by the governor. At the end of the screening exercise, the House has confirmed five of them.

“And four of them, the House has chosen to take a deep breath, given their poor performance and controversies surrounding their documents.

“They have not been able to show this august assembly that they are prepared to serve Rivers State or that they are able.

“And we feel that they are not square pegs in square holes for the offices they intend to occupy in the Rivers State Executive Council.

“On that note, distinguished colleagues, I thank you for your contributions. With your leave and in line with our rules, I will forward the resolution of this august assembly to the governor so that he can take necessary steps in the interest of Rivers State,” he said.

After putting the question to the House to write a letter to the governor, the Speaker added:

See also  Gumi Speaks On Call To Arrest Him Over His Statements On Banditry

“On that note, I’m going to forward a letter to the governor and ask him to swear in five of the nominees as soon as possible.”

Those whose nominations were rejected include Prof Datonye Alasia, Tamuno Williams, Otonye Amachree, and Charity Deemua.

Others cleared by the lawmakers are Tonye Belgam, Prof Temple Nwafor, Dr Peters Nwagor, Lekue Kenneth, and Amarigha Edward-Hart.

Earlier, one of the rejected nominees, Deemua, while responding to a question from Burabari Loolo concerning inconsistencies in her tax clearance, said the document did not show any update of tax payment since December 31, 2018, and asked if she was exempted from paying tax within the period, explaining she is a politician and had no formal job.

Amaewhule interjected: “Madam, you have not been paying tax since 2018?”

Responding, Deemua said, “As I said before, I’m a politician. We don’t have an office. I don’t have work. Mr Speaker, I think tax is generated from your income.”

Amaewhule pressed further: “So politicians don’t pay tax? Have you not had any income since 2018 to date? Madam, you’re under oath; you’ve not had any income from 2018 to 2026. That is what you’re telling Rivers people?”

Deemua explained she was a commissioner in the Rivers State House of Assembly Service Commission and had served briefly as a local government caretaker committee member in 2025 for three months.

The Speaker challenged her: “Were you not paid a salary when you were a caretaker committee member?”

Deemua responded: “We were paid, but I protest, Mr Speaker, the payment was not an income.”

Amaewhule countered: “But you said you have not had any income from 2018 till date, so no tax clearance. That is what you’re telling Rivers people? Madam, that is not nice. You’re misleading the 10th Rivers State House of Assembly.”

See also  EFCC denies targeting opposition, insists on anti-graft mandate

In a face-saving move, the nominee apologised.

Another development saw the House Leader, Major Jack, ask commissioner-nominee, Williams, to recite the second stanza of the national anthem, which he could not, only reciting the first stanza.

Similarly, the House Committee Chairman on Information, Complaints, and Petitions, Dr Enemi George, informed the House of over 10 petitions against nominee Amachree, adding that he received another electronic petition during the screening.

The Speaker said: “Distinguished colleagues, let me thank all of you for your participation in this screening session. You were elected to do this job. It is our duty to get the best for Rivers people, which is why questions were asked and the nominees answered.”

Jack moved a motion for the nominees to take leave of the chamber, seconded by Deputy Majority Leader, Linda Stewart.

The House then adjourned plenary to Tuesday, March 17, 2026.

Meanwhile, the Rivers State House of Assembly, in a statement issued after Monday’s plenary, confirmed the screening of the five nominees.

The statement from Martin Wachukwu, media aide to the Speaker, read: “In sequel to the letter read on the floor of the House last Thursday by Speaker Rt. Hon. Martin Chike Amaewhule, conveying the message of Governor Sir Siminalayi Fubara on the screening and confirmation of commissioner-nominees forwarded to the House pursuant to Section 192 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended; the Rivers State House of Assembly, on Monday, at its 63rd legislative sitting, screened and confirmed the nomination of Mr Tonye Belgam, Dr Peters Nwagor, Prof Temple Nwofor, Mr Lekue Kenneth, and Sir Amarigha Edward-Hart as commissioners and members of the Rivers State Executive Council.

See also  Trump’s threat: EU, ECOWAS, China back Nigeria as Senate moves to liaise with FG

“While the House rejected the nomination of Prof Datonye Alasia, Mrs Charity Deemua, Otonye T.K.D. Amachree, and Tamuno Williams, Esq.

“Screening of the nominees involved scrutiny of their academic qualifications, work history, tax compliance, petitions against some of them, and other matters.”

The Speaker said the essence of the legislative scrutiny was to ensure that Rivers State got the best hands to assist the government in delivering the dividends of democracy to the people.

The House directed the Clerk to transmit the resolution affirming the confirmation of the five nominees to the governor.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

TUMBLR

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

ICPC disowns viral ₦50bn bribe video, warns of legal action

Published

on

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has dismissed as false a viral video alleging a ₦50 billion bribery scandal, describing the content as fabricated and, in parts, artificially generated to mislead the public.

In a statement issued on Monday, the commission said the video, which has been widely circulated online, has no connection whatsoever to the agency and does not reflect any ongoing investigation.

“The images, names, and content in the video are fabricated and, in some instances, AI-generated, designed solely to mislead unsuspecting members of the public,” said ICPC spokesperson J. Okor Odey.

The anti-corruption body stressed that it has not issued any report or statement backing the claims in the video, including the alleged involvement of any individual, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, group of lawyers, or judicial officer.

“For the avoidance of doubt, the ICPC is not investigating any individual, SAN, group of lawyers, or judicial officer in connection with the fictitious ₦50 billion bribe referenced in the video. No such case, transaction, or investigation exists within the records of the commission,” the statement added.

The commission warned those behind the production and circulation of the video to cease immediately, vowing to take decisive legal action against perpetrators.

“The ICPC will not tolerate the misuse of its name and institutional credibility to spread disinformation in the name of ‘content creation”, Odey said, adding that those responsible “will face serious legal consequences.”

The agency urged members of the public to disregard the video and rely only on its official communication channels for verified information, reiterating its commitment to “credible, evidence-based investigations in line with the law.”

See also  Anglican Primate Hails Tinubu’s Economic Plans, Predicts Nigeria’s Rise

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

IG restructures Police Monitoring Unit, appoints new head

Published

on

The Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, has approved the restructuring of the Police Monitoring Unit as part of efforts to strengthen discipline and improve operational efficiency within the Nigeria Police Force.

The Force Public Relations Officer, Anthony Placid, disclosed this in a statement on Monday in Abuja.

He said the move was part of ongoing reforms aimed at refocusing the unit on its core mandate and enhancing oversight across commands and formations.

“As part of the reorganisation, the unit has been streamlined and strengthened to enhance proactive monitoring, intelligence-driven inspections, and real-time oversight of police personnel and operations across Commands, Formations, and Departments.

“The restructured framework also harmonises key investigative and monitoring functions in line with the force’s reform agenda,” he said.

He said the initiative was targeted at promoting professionalism, discipline and accountability within the force.

He added that the Monitoring Unit would play a central role in identifying operational lapses, enforcing standards, and ensuring accountability at all levels.

As part of the changes, the IG approved a leadership transition, appointing Aliyu Abubakar, a Deputy Commissioner of Police, as head of the restructured unit.

Abubakar previously served as Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of the State Criminal Investigation Department in both the Federal Capital Territory and Rivers State.

He said Abubakar played critical roles in high-profile investigations where he worked closely with state leadership to modernise investigative techniques and strengthen operational effectiveness.

NAN

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

See also  See why Trump hammered hard on Nigeria again!
Continue Reading

News

Forensic report reveals Amupitan has no X account, says INEC

Published

on

All the alleged posts, replies, or statements attributed to Prof. Joash Amupitan, Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), on X (Twitter) are fraudulent, forensically unverifiable, technically impossible, and part of a coordinated disinformation campaign, an independent forensic investigation report has revealed.

The report conclusively established that he does not operate any personal X (Twitter) account.

In a detailed forensic report released on Monday by INEC, investigators identified several anomalies. According to the report, one of the most critical pieces of evidence was a timestamp anomaly.

The alleged reply credited to the fake account was posted 13 minutes before the original tweet it supposedly responded to, a scenario described as technically impossible on any digital platform. This finding strongly indicates digital manipulation.

Investigators carried out extensive verification using platform recovery tools, email linkage checks, and phone number analysis.

The findings confirmed that there is no connection between the fake X account and Prof. Amupitan’s verified email or phone number. Claims based on BVN and OPay data were described as misleading and logically flawed. Data breach records circulated online were also found to be unrelated and lacked any direct link to the alleged account.

Further checks using the Wayback Machine showed no record of the account or its posts before April 2026, contradicting claims that it had been active since 2022. In addition, the alleged reply does not exist on the live X platform, reinforcing the conclusion that it was never posted.

INEC also disclosed that on the same day the screenshots went viral, the account was renamed from @joashamupitan to @sundayvibe00, set to private, and labelled a “Parody Account.” This sequence of actions was identified as a deliberate attempt to erase digital traces and evade detection.

See also  EFCC denies targeting opposition, insists on anti-graft mandate

The investigation uncovered a broader impersonation network, including multiple fake Facebook and Instagram accounts using Prof. Amupitan’s identity, recycled profile images across platforms, and systematic misuse of publicly available personal data. INEC concluded that the incident is part of a coordinated effort to manipulate public perception.

The Commission urged Nigerians and media organisations to verify social media content before sharing, emphasising that viral content is not necessarily authentic. It also highlighted the growing risks posed by artificial intelligence and digital manipulation.

The case has been referred to law enforcement agencies for further investigation and possible prosecution under Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act. Authorities are expected to trace those responsible for creating and circulating the fake content.

INEC reiterated that all official communications are issued only through its verified platforms, adding that any account claiming to represent Prof. Amupitan in a personal capacity should be treated as fraudulent unless officially confirmed.

Providing background to the report, Adedayo Oketola, Chief Press Secretary/Media Adviser to the INEC Chairman, recalled that on 10 April 2026, Prof. Amupitan’s attention was drawn to posts and screenshots on social media claiming he operated an X (Twitter) account (@joashamupitan) and made a partisan post (“Victory is sure”) in reply to @dayoisreal.

He said shortly after, more screenshots appeared online showing emails, phone numbers, OPay, and BVN verification data, and data breach records linking Prof. Amupitan to the X (Twitter) account. These records were widely shared across traditional and online media as corroborating proof.

Oketola said after discovering the disinformation, Prof. Amupitan, through him, issued an official statement to debunk the falsehood and clearly stated that he had never owned or operated an X (Twitter) account.

See also  LASBCA reaffirms commitment to enforcing building regulations

Thereafter, he said INEC committed to a full forensic investigation and commissioned an independent forensic cybersecurity expert, who conducted a multi-layered forensic and digital investigation using X platform data, internet archive records, OSINT tools, identity forensics, and cross-platform analysis.

“A combination of INEC’s internal review and the independent investigations by digital forensic and cybersecurity experts have reached the same conclusion with high confidence. The forensic evidence is comprehensive, multi-sourced, and unambiguous. The posts attributed to Prof. Amupitan on X are fabricated. The account is a clear case of impersonation, and the surrounding activity points to a coordinated disinformation effort intended to manipulate public perception. One of the independent investigators described it as ‘a coordinated digital impersonation and disinformation campaign,” the statement read in part.

tribuneonline.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending