Connect with us

News

Presidency Explains Nigeria-UK Migration Agreement, Warns Against Misinformation

Published

on

UK Trade Envoy, Florence Eshalomi and Nigeria’s Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji Ojo

The Bola Ahmed Tinubu-led administration has clarified details surrounding the migration partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom, dismissing claims that the agreement compels Nigeria to accept foreign nationals.

It was reports that the clarification was contained in a statement issued by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

According to the Presidency, the Memorandum of Understanding signed during the visit of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu does not require Nigeria to receive non-citizens.

The statement emphasised that only verified nationals of each country would be repatriated under the agreement.

“Nowhere in the 12-page memorandum is Nigeria required to accept foreign nationals other than Nigerians,” the statement said.

The MoU, signed by Nigeria’s Minister of Interior and the UK Home Secretary, is aimed at promoting safe, orderly, and regulated migration between both countries.

The presidency noted that it also seeks to strengthen cooperation in tackling irregular migration and related offences.

The government explained that returnees must undergo multiple layers of identification and verification before repatriation.

Where errors occur, such individuals would be returned to the requesting country at its own cost, the presidency noted.

Onanuga said the agreement provides that all returnees must be treated with dignity and respect, in line with international human rights standards, adding that it also allows individuals to appeal deportation decisions under applicable domestic and international laws.

The Presidency stressed that Nigeria has not ceded control over its immigration processes, pointing out that under the agreement, the Nigeria Immigration Service retains sole authority to issue travel documents and manage all entry procedures.

The full statement reads: “It has become necessary to debunk the raft of misinformation assailing the migration partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom, as contained in the Memorandum of Understanding signed by the two nations on the sidelines of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s historic state visit to the UK.

“The memorandum on immigration cooperation, like other memoranda signed, aimed to strengthen the partnership between Nigeria and the United Kingdom.

“Nigeria’s Minister of Interior and the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Government of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland signed the Migration MoU.

See also  Corruption: Many people in public office today were not well brought up - Emir of Kano, Sanusi II

“The MoU establishes a framework to facilitate a regulated and safe migration flow between the two countries and to encourage further bilateral cooperation in the fight against irregular migration and associated acts by citizens of each country, in accordance with their respective immigration and citizenship laws and extant international treaties, conventions, protocols, agreements, and charters.

“Nowhere in the 12-page memorandum is Nigeria required to accept foreign nationals other than Nigerians. Nationals to be repatriated must have undergone multiple levels of identification and verification, and, where errors occur, they are returned to the requesting country at the requesting country’s cost.

“Under the agreement, Nigeria and the United Kingdom will work together to secure the dignified return of their nationals who do not, or no longer, have the right to enter or remain in the territory of the other country.

“A clear condition in the MoU is that the returnees concerned are bona fide nationals of the country and are treated with dignity and respect, with due regard to their human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“Law enforcement officers in each country will take the necessary action to protect the interests and well-being of citizens of either party and to mitigate conflict triggers related to migration matters.

“A key provision in the MoU is that the migrant to be returned must carry his legally acquired personal belongings to the country of destination, unlike in the past when migrants left with nothing.

“Article 12 further reinforces this good deal: “Every returnee will be given ample opportunity to make adequate arrangements for the transfer or disposal of his property in the territory of the requesting party, under the supervision of the mission of the requested party.”

“Another provision is that where a return is being considered, and the person has made a claim under relevant domestic or international human rights legislation, that claim will be considered in line with the provisions under the party’s respective domestic legislation. The appeal may relate to circumstances in which the foreign nationals have been lawfully resident in the territory of the requesting party for most of their lives and socially and culturally integrated in the territory of the requesting party. Another ground of appeal may be where the nationals would face significant obstacles to their integration into the country to which they are to be deported.

See also  Lagos NLC demands N225,000 minimum wage

“Article 9 of the MoU sets out the conditions for the migrant’s return.

“Before departure, identification checks will be carried out by the officers of the requested party in the territory of the requesting party and on arrival by the competent authorities of the requested party. The requesting party will coordinate all returns with the officers of the requested party.

“A return may be conducted by means of a scheduled aircraft or an aircraft chartered specifically for this purpose by the authorities of the parties; the requesting party will provide the flight details and particulars of each returnee five (5) working days before the date of return.

“A return will be conducted using an original, valid passport, or, if the requesting party can biometrically match a returnee to a visa application made in the territory of the requested party, then an expedited process will be permissible, via which the requesting party will facilitate the return or repatriation using a UK Letter (UKL).

“If a returnee cannot be biometrically matched to a visa application by the requesting party, but there is otherwise strong evidence to confirm nationality, including a copy of a passport, a passport number or a national identity card, then an expedited process will again be permissible via which the requesting party will facilitate return or repatriation using a UK Letter (UKL).

“Should the requested party not be satisfied with a returnee’s identity within five (5) working days of submission of the UK Letter (UKL) to Nigerian authorities, detailed reasons should be presented to the requesting party why the identity cannot be satisfied. In these circumstances, removal will be deferred.

“If subsequent evidence shows that a returnee who has been returned is not a national of the requested party, the requesting party will take the person back to its territory at the requesting party’s cost and by the most efficient means possible. The request for the return of the person referred to in Article X will be made within ten (10) working days following the return exercise and carried out within fourteen (14) working days after acceptance of the request.”

See also  Affordable housing key to police welfare, says IG

“Article 9, subsection 3, shows that Nigeria has not ceded to the UK the right to document the repatriated person.

“The section says: It shall be the sole responsibility of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) to issue and handle, as is necessary under Nigerian domestic legislation, any Nigerian documentation (including the digital acknowledgement of receipt of a UK Letter) ahead of the notified date of return as stated in the UK Letter. This shall be distinct from the UK Letter process and remains the sole right and responsibility of Nigerian authorities, including the handling of the
travel document and any onward transmission required from the issuing office to enable entry.

“Article 11 deals with returnee reintegration assistance. It states that every returnee will be able to access basic on-arrival and reintegration assistance in the territory of the requested party.

“Short-term assistance may include airport reception, accommodation, onward transportation, care and provision packs and small cash assistance. Medium-term assistance can include support to find and reunite with family; support in obtaining the in-country documentation required, signposting to local services, and the potential provision of mental well-being and counselling services (if required).

“Longer-term assistance may allow access to a Returnee Education and Entrepreneurship Fund to enable sustainable reintegration. Support may include accessing the local job market, setting up a business, accessing vocational training or further education, and assistance with legal migration opportunities.

“Should the parties’ domestic legislation regarding the provision of reintegration support to all or certain categories of returnees change, or should the overarching non-legally mandated package of reintegration support change, the parties will inform each other as soon as is practicable.”

” The MoU, similar to those signed in 2012, 2017, and 2022, is for an initial period of five years, renewable for a further five-year period, as may be agreed by the parties.

“We reiterate that media organisations should seek clarification when uncertain about any issue to avoid misinforming the public.”

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

62 Nigerians held in Uganda denied legal access – Lawyer

Published

on

Fresh concerns have emerged over the detention of 62 Nigerians as Ugandan authorities allegedly denied the detainees access to legal representation, PUNCH Metro has learnt.

The Nigerians, said to be members of a Christian missionary group, Life Mission, were detained by immigration authorities over allegations of illegally operating churches.

The country’s Directorate of Citizenship and Immigration Control disclosed this in a statement posted on its X handle on Wednesday.

It was also learnt that the arrests were carried out during operations conducted on April 27, 2026, in Adjumani and the Bukoto–Ntinda area of Kampala.

However, in an exclusive interview with PUNCH Metro on Thursday, the executive director of the mission group, Michael ChristisKing, said the detainees were Christian missionaries engaged in a long-running cross-cultural outreach focused on humanitarian service.

ChristisKing also disclosed that the organisation followed due process before entering the country, adding that the group secured invitations and approvals from relevant authorities, including the Office of the Prime Minister, the Commissioner for Refugees, and the Born Again Fellowship of Uganda.

PUNCH Metro, however, learnt that efforts to check on their welfare and provide legal representation had been unsuccessful.

A Ugandan lawyer, Israel Mivule, who was contracted by the mission group, told PUNCH Metro on Sunday that he was denied access to the detainees during a visit to the facility on Friday.

He added that he made repeated efforts to speak with at least one detainee but was denied access.

He said, “I arrived at the detention facility in Namawme, a large compound with a high fence and a locked gate. After introducing myself as a lawyer acting on instructions, I was refused access and directed to return to Kampala to obtain permission from senior officials.

See also  Corruption: Many people in public office today were not well brought up - Emir of Kano, Sanusi II

“I pleaded with the officer to allow me at least a one-on-one interaction with any of the detainees to assess their well-being, but he declined, saying granting such access could jeopardise his job.”

The lawyer stressed that the development was a clear breach of Ugandan constitutional provisions.

He further revealed that from his position at the gate, he could see the detainees moving within the facility, but observed that they were cut off from communication.

“As a lawyer, I emphasised that detainees have the right to legal representation and a fair hearing. Under Articles 50 and 51, they have the right to access their lawyers at any time. Denying them that access is a violation of their rights.

“From where I stood, I could see them moving around, but they had no access to communication devices such as mobile phones. Preventing them from communicating with their lawyers or even family members infringes on their fundamental freedoms,” he added.

Mivule said he was forced to leave after spending considerable time at the facility without gaining entry.

He disclosed that efforts were ongoing to secure the release of the detainees, noting that there were grounds to challenge their continued detention.

The lawyer also revealed plans to revisit the Ugandan Ministry of Internal Affairs and possibly escalate the matter to court if diplomatic efforts fail.

Speaking further on efforts made, Mivule said there had been initial collaboration with the Nigerian embassy, including discussions around possible waivers.

“There were discussions about payments and possible waivers requested from Internal Affairs, but if the embassy does not act promptly, we, as legal representatives, will formally write and escalate the matter to the courts to obtain an order for their immediate release,” he added.

See also  President Tinubu holds inaugural meeting with CDS, Service Chiefs at State House

He disclosed that the body assigned to monitor missionary activities in Uganda had expressed surprise at the development.

Mivule said, “One of the leaders responsible for overseeing missionary activities was unaware of their detention and expressed shock when I informed him. He acknowledged that urgent steps should be taken to resolve the matter.”

However, a document sighted by PUNCH Metro on Sunday showed that the National Fellowship of Born Again Pentecostal Churches in Uganda had formally acknowledged the mission’s activities in the country before their arrest.

In a letter dated August 15, 2025, and addressed to the Nigerian High Commission in Kampala, the fellowship confirmed that the mission, identified as Exalting Jesus Life Missions, was “well known” to the body.

The letter, signed by the General Secretary of the fellowship, Bishop Dr Africano Magyezi, stated that the organisation is a non-profit group granted permission to bring volunteer students to Uganda for missionary work, particularly among refugees in camps.

It read, “This is to confirm to you that the above-captioned ministry/mission is well known to us. They are a non-profit organisation that was granted permission to bring volunteer students on a mission to Uganda, ministering to refugees living in the refugee camps.

“They have been working in Uganda since 2023, carrying out those missions, and now they are coming to Uganda with a group of 107 Nigerian missionaries and other Ugandan volunteers. The Fellowship supports its members to upgrade their careers and statuses so as to participate better in community development.”

The fellowship further urged that any assistance rendered to the group in the course of its activities would be appreciated.

See also  Use your influence to promote unity and not division - President Tinubu tells Content creators

When contacted, the spokesperson for the Nigerian Diaspora Commission, Abdur-Rahman Balogun, could not be reached for comments as calls to his telephone line were not answered.

A text message sent to him had also not been replied to as of the time this report was filed.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

Xenophobia: 130 Nigerians sign up for South Africa evacuation

Published

on

At least 130 Nigerians have already registered for voluntary evacuation flights from South Africa as Nigeria moves to safeguard its citizens amid rising tensions linked to anti-foreigner protests in the country.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bianca Odumegwu-Ojukwu, in a situation report via her X handle on Sunday, said the evacuation arrangement is part of broader diplomatic and security measures being coordinated with Nigerian missions in South Africa.

The minister explained that the evacuation plan follows directives from President Bola Tinubu, who ordered heightened monitoring of the situation and stronger protection for Nigerians abroad.

“The President has reiterated that the priority at this time remains the safety of our citizens,” she said, adding that “arrangements are currently underway to collate details of Nigerians in South Africa for voluntary repatriation flights for those seeking assistance to return home.”

Odumegwu-Ojukwu said, “So far, 130 applicants have duly registered for the exercise with our mission,” noting that the number is expected to increase as more citizens seek assistance to return home.

Odumegwu-Ojukwu also confirmed that the ministry had summoned South Africa’s Acting High Commissioner over the unrest, while diplomatic engagements continue with authorities in South Africa.

The development comes amid renewed anti-immigrant demonstrations in cities including Pretoria and Johannesburg, which Nigerian authorities say have heightened concern for the safety of their nationals.

“There is heightened anxiety over the series of anti-foreigner protests, also targeted at Nigerians in select cities in the Republic of South Africa in recent weeks,” the minister said.

See also  DAWN, SWDC partner to boost South West development

She added that the President had “expressed grave concern on the situation following a briefing, and has called for more effective control of the situation by relevant host security services.”

Odumegwu-Ojukwu noted that while South African authorities, including President Cyril Ramaphosa and senior security officials, had condemned violence, disturbing images circulating online had fuelled international concern.

“The images pervading both mainstream and social media depicting violence, carnage and targeted xenophobic killings of foreign nationals and demonstrations characterised by xenophobic rhetoric, hate speeches and incendiary anti-migrant statements by the arrowheads of such rallies, have generated worldwide condemnation,” she stated.

According to her, protests held between April 27 and 29, 2026, were largely peaceful but still required heavy police deployment in the affected cities.

“The protests spearheaded by a local anti-migration movement, in Pretoria and Johannesburg, between 27 – 29 April 2026, witnessed a largely peaceful procession, under the presence of heavily armed police who occasionally sprayed teargas to deter the protesters from engaging in violent activity.

“There is no recorded killing of any Nigerian or destruction of Nigerian-owned properties during this particular protest,” the minister explained.

However, Odumegwu-Ojukwu confirmed two separate deaths involving Nigerians, both allegedly linked to interactions with security personnel.

“Amamiro Chidiebere Emmanuel died on 25th of April 2026 as a result of injuries sustained from brutal beatings by military personnel of the South African National Defence Force on 20th April 2026 in Port Elizabeth,” she said, referring to the South African National Defence Force.

She further disclosed that “Nnaemeka Matthew Andrew also died following an alleged interaction with members of the Tshwane Metro Police, and his body was discovered at the Pretoria Central Mortuary on 20th April 2026.”

See also  FG supplies Ekiti with 80,500 doses of livestock vaccines

Describing both incidents as unacceptable, Odumegwu-Ojukwu said, “This is utterly condemnable and unacceptable. The Nigerian High Commission is closely following investigations into these unfortunate incidents, and Nigeria demands justice be done in these cases.”

The minister added that another wave of demonstrations is expected between May 4 and 8, 2026, prompting further security and diplomatic coordination between both countries.

She stressed that Nigerian diplomatic missions are working closely with South African authorities to ensure the protection of citizens while evacuation preparations continue.

The minister further stated, “Nigeria is a frontline state which made great sacrifices towards the liberation struggles of South Africa, a fact which needs to be distilled down to the younger generation in South Africa.

“Nigerian lives and businesses in SA must not continue to be put at risk, and we remain committed to working with South Africa to explore ways to put an end to this xenophobic pattern.

“It has become a repetitive wave, most especially before elections in South Africa, and anti-foreigner opposition parties leverage this situation to garner votes.

“Nigeria recently signed a memorandum of understanding with South Africa on early warning to protect citizens of both countries, especially in times such as these.”

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

News

PHOTOS: Nigerian woman who was childless for 14 years d!es hours after delivering quintuplets

Published

on

A 45-year old woman, Mrs Mary Yaduyan, has d!ed a few hours after delivering a set of quintuplets—five baby boys, at a specialist hospital in Akure, Ondo State.

It was gathered that the deceased had been childless for over 14 years before she eventually conceived in 2025 through an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) procedure.

Mary was said to have passed away following a complication identified by medical experts as a pulmonary embolism, few hours after she was delivered of the babies via caesarean section.

The hospital, known for handling multiple births, was thrown into mourning following the sudden d3ath, which occurred about four hours after what had been described as a successful delivery.

The woman had reportedly undergone regular antenatal care without major complications throughout the pregnancy.

Speaking with Ondo State Government publication, Hope Newspaper, the lead consultant, who does not want his name in print, expressed sadness over the situation, saying someone he cared for, did not make it at last.

He said that the patient had a history of uterine fibroids, which were surgically removed two years prior to the procedure.

According to him, the pregnancy progressed smoothly until about 31 weeks, when she experienced premature rupture of membranes and was placed under close medical supervision.

The doctor said the medical team adopted conservative management to prolong the pregnancy to a safer gestational age, while monitoring for signs of infection and other complications.

“The patient later complained of chest pain, prompting the involvement of a consultant cardiologist.

“However, initial assessments did not indicate immediate danger,” he said.

See also  Use your influence to promote unity and not division - President Tinubu tells Content creators

“Following the delivery, the patient remained stable, with normal vital signs, including blood pressure and oxygen levels normal. Medical personnel, including a consultant anaesthesiologist, reportedly monitored her closely due to the high-risk nature of the delivery.

“Everything appeared normal after the operation. There was no sign of excessive bleeding, and her vital signs were stable.”

He added that the sudden deterioration was later attributed to ‘pulmonary embolism’, a condition caused by blood clot blocking vessels in the lungs which could occur without prior warning.

Despite swift resuscitation efforts, the patient could not be revived.

Speaking with the publication, the elder sister of the deceased, Mrs. Olusola Ajayi, recounted the final moments before her sister’s demise.

“She called me when I arrived at the hospital and said she wanted to eat rice with red oil without stew. Later, she changed her mind and rejected the food,” she said.

Ajayi explained that the family was informed the surgery would take place around 10 a.m., adding that they were on a video call with the deceased’s husband, who is outside the country, throughout the procedure.

“After the delivery, we were all jubilating. We even called our mother to inform her that everything went well. We were celebrating and encouraging ourselves,” she added.

She said she was later told to get medications for the newborns and immediately went to purchase them.

“But when I returned, I saw many people gathered in the room, and she was no longer responding when I called her. That was how we lost her,” she said.

See also  Affordable housing key to police welfare, says IG

Ajayi confirmed that doctors attended to her sister throughout and that the family made every effort to ensure she received the best care.

“We did everything we could, but God Almighty knows why it happened this way,” she concluded.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending