Connect with us

News

FG eyes oil windfall to fund N9tn budget gap

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Tuesday asked the National Assembly to approve a N9.09tn increase in the 2026 budget.

The government plans to finance the budget increase through crude oil gains linked to the Unites States-Iran conflict and by securing new loans

The Tinubu’s request, which signals a significant adjustment to the fiscal framework for the coming year, was conveyed in a letter read on the Senate floor by the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, during plenary on Tuesday.

Tinubu explained that the proposed adjustment is intended to enhance fiscal transparency and support the effective execution of key national programmes.

The letter reads, “The proposed adjustment is aimed at strengthening fiscal transparency and ensuring the effective implementation of priority national programmes.”

According to him, the review would allow the government to properly capture existing public debt obligations within the fiscal framework.

The adjustment, Tinubu added, would also provide for a limited number of strategic priority projects while aligning the 2026 financing plan to safeguard macroeconomic stability and reduce pressure on the domestic financial market.

However, the National Assembly passed the 2026 Appropriation Bill, increasing the budget to N68.32tn from the N58.18tn initially proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

An analysis by The PUNCH shows that adding the President’s N9.09tn request to the original proposal would bring the total to about N67.3tn. This indicates that the approved figure of N68.32tn includes an additional increase of roughly N1tn beyond the executive’s request.

The upward revision, according to lawmakers, is intended to clear legacy obligations, fund key infrastructure, strengthen the judiciary, boost healthcare interventions, and support preparations for the 2027 general elections.

Presenting the report, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Solomon Adeola, said the increase was necessary to address outstanding commitments and align the budget with prevailing economic conditions.

He said the adjustment would “regularise outstanding commitments from previous fiscal years, align the budget with current economic realities and maintain macroeconomic stability.”

Tinubu had originally presented the N58.18tn proposal to the National Assembly on December 19, 2025, under the theme, “Budget of Consolidation, Renewed Resilience and Shared Prosperity,” with a focus on economic growth, security and capital projects.

However, the version approved by both chambers reflects a significant expansion in spending.

A breakdown shows that N4.799tn is allocated to statutory transfers, N15.809tn to debt servicing, N15.427tn to recurrent (non-debt) expenditure, and N32.287tn to capital projects.

The committee explained that the N9.09tn increase followed a formal request from the President to include critical expenditures omitted in the initial proposal and to prevent unresolved obligations from undermining the 2026 fiscal plan.

A major component of the adjustment is the rollover of N7.71tn in outstanding capital obligations from the 2025 budget.

Lawmakers noted that about 70 per cent of capital projects in the 2025 Appropriation Act were affected by revenue shortfalls, necessitating a carryover into 2026 to avoid abandonment and rising costs.

Beyond legacy liabilities, new provisions were introduced for strategic interventions across key sectors.

These include N478.6bn as the Federal Government’s equity contribution under the Ministry of Finance Incorporated framework to support rail projects in Lagos, Kano, Kaduna and Ogun States, as well as feasibility studies for urban rail systems in Enugu and Maiduguri and upgrades to the narrow-gauge rail network.

The committee also approved N8.96bn for feasibility studies on the Calabar–Maiduguri corridor and the Maiduguri–Sokoto superhighway under the Tinubu National Beltway Initiative.

In the health sector, an additional $344.83m, equivalent to about N482.76bn, was allocated for priority interventions under bilateral agreements, aimed at improving healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

The judiciary received increased funding, including N98.5bn for the Court of Appeal, N36.7bn for the Supreme Court and N268.54bn to restore its budget ceiling and accommodate the appointment of more judges ahead of the 2027 elections.

Lawmakers stressed that strengthening the judiciary was essential to handling election-related disputes and ensuring timely justice.

To finance the expanded budget, the committee proposed a combination of revenue measures and borrowing.

This includes a $10 per barrel increase in the oil benchmark, expected to generate about N2.592tn in additional revenue.

The committee also highlighted improved contributions from the telecommunications sector following tariff adjustments and policy reforms.

It is projected that MTN Nigeria would generate N724bn in company income tax in 2026, while Airtel Nigeria is expected to contribute N150bn, bringing total additional revenue from the sector to N874bn.

Despite these measures, lawmakers approved an increase in external borrowing by N6.163tn to bridge the financing gap, noting that the borrowing remains within manageable limits.

The report stated that the 2026 budget is designed to strengthen macroeconomic stability, improve the business environment, create jobs and reduce poverty.

It added that priority sectors include security, infrastructure, health, education and human capital development.

See also  2027: APC kicks as opposition backs single day polls

The committee recalled that the Senate had debated the general principles of the bill in December 2025 before subjecting it to detailed scrutiny, including engagements with the President’s economic team.

It said a public hearing held on February 9, 2026, themed ‘From Budget to Impact,’ drew inputs from government agencies, civil society groups, development partners and private sector stakeholders.

However, lawmakers raised concerns over delays in fund releases and other bureaucratic challenges that affected the implementation of the 2025 budget.

They called for urgent reforms, warning that such bottlenecks could weaken the impact of the 2026 fiscal plan.

The committee recommended stronger collaboration between the executive and legislature, as well as improved oversight to ensure the timely execution of projects.

It also proposed extending the 2025 Appropriation Act to June 30, 2026, to allow for the completion of ongoing projects.

Adeola commended members of the committee and stakeholders for their contributions, noting that collaboration with the House of Representatives ensured a balanced report.

He urged the Senate to approve the revised bill, describing it as critical to sustaining economic gains, addressing structural challenges and setting the country on a path of growth.

Like the Senate, the House of Representatives also passed the N68.30tn Appropriation Bill for the 2026 fiscal year.

At a plenary on Tuesday, presided over by the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, the House also approved extending the implementation of the capital component of the 2025 budget from March 31 to June 30, 2026.

Of the proposed total expenditure of N68.30tn, N34.33tn is the projected revenue for the year. Budget deficit is N23.85tn, representing 4.28 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product.

Macroeconomic assumptions of the budget consist of an oil benchmark of $64.85 per barrel, a production target of 1.84 million barrels per day, and an exchange rate of N1,400 to a dollar.

The Federal Government’s share of the main revenue pool is projected at N21.62tn, while the revenue targets for tax and non-tax sources are N124.25tn and N845.98 bn, respectively.

The government also hopes to generate N1.37tn from foreign aid and grants, with government-owned enterprises expected to contribute N10.27tn to the revenue pool.

The Federal Government allocated N618.13bn to the Niger Delta Development Commission, N244.07bn to the North-East Development Commission and N145bn to the North-West Development Commission. The South-West, South-South, South-East and North-West Development commissions had a statutory transfer of N140bn each.

Other statutory transfers include the National Assembly (N577.85bn), the Independent National Electoral Commission (N1tn), the National Human Rights Commission (N20bn) and the Public Complaints Commission (N29.46bn).

Also, domestic debt servicing, including ways and means, got N10.16tn, while foreign debt was allocated N5.36tn.

The presidency was allocated N142.42bn, the Ministry of Defence (N2.69tn), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (N287.90bn), and the Office of the Head of the Service of the Federation (N17.17bn), among others.

Addressing lawmakers shortly before the passage of the budget, the Chairman, House Committee on Appropriation, Mr Abubakar Bichi, said all amounts appropriated in the proposal shall be released from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation only for the purpose specified in the executive bill.

On virement, the Kano lawmaker noted that “if the implementation of any of the projects intended to be undertaken under this bill cannot be completed without virement, such virement shall only be effected with the prior approval of the National Assembly.”

He called on the Accountant General of the Federation to “immediately, upon coming into force of this bill, maintain a separate record for the documentation of revenue accruing to the Consolidated Revenue Fund in excess of the oil price benchmark adopted in this budget.”

According to Bichi, “such revenues refer to monies accruing from sales of government crude oil in excess of the approved benchmark price per barrel, the Petroleum Profit Tax and Royalty on Oil and Gas.”

With the Senate similarly passing the budget proposal, it is expected to be transmitted to the President for assent in the coming days.

Tinubu’s $6bn loan

The Senate and House of Representatives have also approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to secure fresh external loans totalling $6bn, in a move aimed at plugging fiscal gaps and financing key infrastructure projects.

The approval followed the presentation and consideration of reports by the Chairmen of the Senate and House Committees on Local and Foreign Debts, Senator Aliyu Wamakko (APC, Sokoto North) and his House of Representatives counterpart, Abubakar Nalaraba, on Tuesday.

The red chamber’s decision came just hours after the President formally wrote to the Senate seeking legislative backing for the facilities, underscoring the Executive’s push to shore up funding for priority sectors.

In a letter addressed to the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and read during plenary, Tinubu sought approval to borrow $5bn from Abu Dhabi Bank to support budget deficit financing and meet existing debt obligations.

See also  Nigeria spends N9tn importing petrol

The president said the facility would be made available to Nigeria in tranches.

The letter partly read, “The purpose of this letter is to request for the approval and resolution of the national assembly pursuant to the provisions of section 21(1) and 27(1) of the debt management office establishment act 2003 to establish a structured total return swap derivative external financing programme from First Abu Dhabi Bank of the United Arab Emirates of up to $5bn which will be made available to the Federal Republic of Nigeria in tranches.”

Tinubu said the proceeds would be used for budget implementation, development of priority infrastructure projects and repayment of relatively expensive domestic and external debts.

He added that the facility would also help the federal government meet urgent financial obligations when necessary.

The president said Nigeria’s total public debt currently stands at $110.3bn, equivalent to about N159.2tn as of December 31, 2025.

In a separate letter, the president sought approval for a $1bn UK export finance loan facility arranged by Citibank, London branch.

Tinubu noted that the projects—covering the Lagos Port Complex and Tin Can Island Port—are designed to tackle longstanding operational challenges and reposition Nigeria’s maritime sector.

“The rehabilitation of the ports project is a strategic modernisation initiative of the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Nigerian Ports Authority to restore and upgrade two of Nigeria’s most vital ports, namely Tin Can Island Port complex and Lagos Port complex, Apapa, which have reached critical engineering failures,” the letter read.

Following the reading of the requests, Akpabio had referred both letters to the Senate Committee on Local and Foreign Debts, directing the panel to expedite consideration and report back promptly—a directive that culminated in Tuesday’s approval.

The latest borrowing request comes amid the Federal Government’s continued reliance on a mix of domestic and external loans to finance budget deficits and critical infrastructure.

Shortly after both letters were read by Mr Abbas, the requests were referred to the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debts Management.

The House thereafter dissolved into the Committee of Supply to consider the report.

Speaking on the substance of the request, Nalaraba who represents Awe/Doma/Keana Federal Constituency, Nasarawa State said, “The House should consider the report of the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt Management on the request for approval to establish a structured total return swap an external financing programme of $5bn with First Abu Dhabi Bank, to support Federal Government funding and fiscal liquidity management and approve recommendations therein.”

According to him, “the implementation of a total return swap transaction involving the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank in aggregate principal amount of up to $5bn together with the collateralisation of the transaction by the issuance of naira-denominated FGN Securities to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC as collateral for the loan of up to 133.3 per cent of the amount drawn.”

The Committee recommended that the Federal Government of Nigeria make margining payments to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC in dollars upon demand if, at any time, either due to fluctuations in the market prices of the Federal Government securities or as a result of movements in exchange rate or both, the value of the collateral issued to First Abu Dhabi Bank falls below the initial value at the time of issuance.”

Another recommendation includes “that the $5bn should be drawn down in tranches, with each tranche comprising a corresponding confirmation and other ancillary agreements (as may be required) between the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank.

“Authorisation of the use of proceeds for budget implementation, development of key infrastructure projects, which are of priority to the administration, repayment of relatively more expensive domestic and external debts in the Federal Government of Nigeria’s public debt portfolio.”

Both loan requests were unanimously approved when the lawmakers returned to plenary from the Committee on Supply, where the consideration took place.

Expert react

Commenting, the Chief Executive Officer of CSA Advisory and a development economist, Aliyu Ilias, urged the Federal Government to prioritise security, economic productivity and targeted support measures in deploying the proposed N9tn budget expansion.

Speaking in a telephone interview with our correspondent, Ilias said strengthening security should be the government’s foremost priority, noting that economic growth would remain constrained without stability across the country.

“The first sector these funds should be channelled into is security. Once we are able to stabilise the security situation, then we can look at the economy, particularly trade and industry, to make things actually work,” he said.

He also called for targeted interventions to cushion the impact of rising crude oil prices on Nigerians, suggesting that some form of subsidy or support mechanism may still be necessary.

See also  UN urges stronger action to end violence against women, girls

“I also expect a form of relative subsidy in terms of helping people to mitigate the effect of the rising price of crude oil and its impact on petrol prices. It can even be extended to critical players like Dangote as some form of leverage, if funds can be directed to that sector,” he added.

On the proposed budget review, Ilias said the move was not unexpected, citing Nigeria’s historical trend of revising budgets during the fiscal cycle.

He pointed to structural issues in past budgets, particularly the low implementation of capital projects, as justification for a larger fiscal framework.

The economist further explained that changes in global oil prices have altered Nigeria’s revenue outlook, creating room for upward budget adjustments.

While supporting a larger budget size, Ilias emphasised the need for improved revenue generation to sustain increased spending.

“For me, I am an advocate of a bigger budget, but only if we can strengthen our revenue side. A bigger budget allows us to implement more projects and drive development,” he stated.

He also stressed the importance of increasing capital expenditure, warning that rising global volatility could worsen Nigeria’s debt profile.

Ilias, however, cautioned that the effectiveness of the budget review would ultimately depend on how well the additional funds are utilised.

Also speaking, an economist, Professor Adeola Adenikinju, urged the Federal Government to prioritise the power sector, social investment programmes, infrastructure, and agriculture to address the country’s economic challenges and improve citizens’ welfare.

Speaking on key areas requiring urgent government attention, Adenikinju stressed the importance of electricity for economic growth and welfare.

“I think the power sector is very important. The power sector? Yes, given the role that the power sector, or electricity, plays in economic growth and welfare generally. The power sector is very important,” he said.

While noting that the sector has already been privatised, the economist pointed out that several unresolved challenges persist.

“I know it is privatised, but there are legacy issues that require further attention. The huge debt that is being owed is probably because of issues with tariffs,” he said.

According to him, the government must address major infrastructure gaps in the electricity value chain.

“We have to fix some of the infrastructural issues, particularly the transmission and distribution segments that are not working well. That is one sector that is very important,” he added.

Beyond power, Adenikinju also called for stronger social protection programmes to cushion the impact of ongoing economic reforms on vulnerable citizens.

“Then the government needs to pay more attention to social investment expenditure because a lot of people are feeling the impact of reform,” he said.

He noted that reforms introduced by the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had intensified inflationary pressures on households.

“The effect of the economic reforms that the president started about three years ago—removal of subsidy, the single-unit pricing, all of that—has led to severe inflation in the economy and has impacted negatively on the welfare of people,” he said.

Adenikinju emphasised that targeted relief measures are necessary for citizens most affected by the reforms.

“There needs to be an effective way of providing relief to very poor people who are badly affected by the reforms. Social investment is very important to take care of those who are extremely vulnerable and who are struggling,” he added.

The economist also identified poor infrastructure, particularly road networks, as a major contributor to rising food prices across the country.

“The other sector that I will mention is infrastructure. Our roads are bad. The roads leading to rural areas are very bad. Therefore, that has driven up the cost of food in many urban areas where a lot of consumers are,” he said.

He noted that improving transport links between rural production areas and urban markets would help reduce food costs.

“The road infrastructure has to be looked at. It has to be improved, especially the rural–urban areas and from the food-producing areas to urban centres,” he said.

Adenikinju further stressed the need for greater government support for farmers through improved access to agricultural inputs.

“Finally, I will say agriculture—by providing food seedlings for farmers and supporting fertilisers,” he said.

He warned that rising fertiliser prices, driven by global factors, were also affecting local food production.

“The prices of fertilisers have gone up because of the war. They also have to be supported. So these are the areas that I think should be prioritised, in my view,” he added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Reps order IG to produce fake, PFIPC agency DG Adeyemi within 48 hours

Published

on

The House of Representatives Committee investigating the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council has directed the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, to produce the self-acclaimed Director-General of the organisation, Adeyemi Adeniyi, before it on Wednesday.

The directive was issued on Monday during the resumed investigative hearing at the National Assembly Complex, Abuja.

Representing the IG, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bashir Abdullahi, appeared before the committee and was instructed to ensure Adeyemi’s appearance by noon on Wednesday to assist lawmakers in their ongoing investigation into the activities of the organisation.

The committee is probing the circumstances under which the PFIPC, despite not being legally established, allegedly secured office accommodation in Phase III of the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja and received a budgetary allocation of ₦1.32bn in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

The directive followed the Nigeria Police Force’s confirmation of key aspects of its criminal investigation, including petitions from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President alleging that Adeyemi fraudulently presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

The Committee Chairman, Yusuf Gagdi, said Adeyemi’s appearance had become imperative given the seriousness of the allegations and the institutions implicated in the matter.

“This committee clearly needs the suspected DG to appear before this committee. People’s names are involved. People’s integrity are involved. Institutional names are involved. Institutional integrity is involved.

“It is not an option now. We will need him here to confirm some documents to us in such a way that will not undermine our investigation to enable us to submit our report on time,” Gagdi said.

See also  Pope Leo names Nigeria among countries witnessing Christian persecution

The committee subsequently directed its clerk to formally communicate its resolution to the Inspector-General of Police.

“The committee hereby resolves that the Inspector-General of Police of the Federal Republic of Nigeria do kindly present Mr Adeyemi on Wednesday by 12 noon. That is the ruling of the committee,” Gagdi declared.

Earlier, ACP Abdullahi informed lawmakers that although investigations were ongoing, the police had already filed an eight-count charge against Adeyemi before the Federal High Court.

“The Nigerian Police Force investigated part of this case late last year and filed eight-count charges before a Federal High Court. The case is ongoing,” he said.

He disclosed that the suspect had been arrested and arraigned, but cautioned against making public disclosures that could prejudice the ongoing investigation or judicial proceedings.

“We don’t want to say things that are under investigation. It is definitely going to prejudice the ongoing investigation and make people have opinions that may prejudge the outcome of an investigation or judicial decision,” Abdullahi stated.

Despite the police’s reservations, the committee sought confirmation of documentary evidence already in its possession.

The police confirmed that on October 17, 2025, the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President petitioned security agencies over allegations against Adeyemi, prompting investigations that culminated in criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud.

Investigators also confirmed receiving another petition alleging that Adeyemi falsely presented himself as the Director-General of both the Presidential Economic Advisory Council and the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council.

According to the police, the petition alleged that Adeyemi used the purported office to obtain accommodation within the Federal Secretariat, sought approval to recruit about 300 personnel, attempted to secure a $1.3 billion allocation in the 2026 Appropriation Act for the non-existent agency, and planned to organise a World Investment Summit under the platform of the purported council.

See also  C’River mobile court convicts 34 for bribing FRSC officers

One of the highlights of the hearing came when the committee compared signatures on documents allegedly issued from the Office of the Chief of Staff to the President with signatures on authentic official correspondence obtained by the police.

When asked whether the signatures matched, the police witness responded unequivocally,”They are not the same.”

The committee said the discrepancy reinforced concerns that official State House documents may have been forged.

Gagdi further asked, “So, it is not only a letter that was suspected to be forged? We are dealing with documents that include what is said to be a forged Act of the National Assembly in an attempt to establish a fake agency,” he added.

Gagdi disclosed that investigators had identified about 29 allegedly forged documents, including purported approvals from the State House, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, the Ministry of Finance and several other government institutions.

According to him, representatives of many of the affected agencies had already appeared before the committee and disowned the documents attributed to their offices.

Gagdi, however, stressed that the committee had deliberately avoided compelling the police to disclose information that could compromise ongoing criminal investigations.

“We are avoiding a situation whereby they will be pushed to make statements that will undermine their ongoing investigation,” he added.

He assured that the House investigation would continue independently and that its final report could recommend further action by relevant security agencies.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

See also  Nigeria will be lending to nations by 2026 – Remi Tinubu

Continue Reading

News

Forged state house letter used to create fake PFIPC agency, Acct-General reveals

Published

on

The House of Representatives’ investigation into the operations of the controversial Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council took a dramatic turn on Monday after the Accountant-General of the Federation, Shamseldeen Ogunjimi, revealed that a forged State House letter was used to obtain official government recognition for the ‘fake’ agency.

Appearing before the House Ad Hoc Committee probing the circumstances surrounding the establishment and operations of the council, Ogunjimi disclosed that the Office of the Accountant-General acted on what appeared to be an authentic correspondence from the presidency requesting the creation of an administrative code for the PIFPC, only for investigations to later establish that the letter did not originate from the State House.

The revelation is the latest in a series of disclosures before the committee, which is investigating how a non-existent presidential agency allegedly secured office accommodation in the Federal Secretariat, sought budgetary allocations, recruited personnel and obtained official government recognition through what investigators believe were forged documents.

Presenting his report, Ogunjimi said the Office of the Accountant-General first interacted with the purported council in November 2024.

According to him, “a letter dated November 7, 2024, bearing a State House reference number, requested the creation of an administrative code for the Presidential Economic Advisory Council to facilitate budgeting, accounting and financial reporting.”

He explained that, in line with established procedures, “the Office of the Accountant-General processed the request, created the administrative code and communicated its approval to the State House,” with a copy sent to the Office of the Auditor-General for the Federation.

See also  C’River mobile court convicts 34 for bribing FRSC officers

Following that approval, the office received additional requests from the purported council, including applications for self-accounting status, deployment of personnel, opening of Treasury Single Account and domiciliary accounts, as well as funding approvals.

Ogunjimi, however, stressed that although some administrative processes were carried out, no public funds were ever released to the council.

“It is important to note that no funds were released under salaries, overhead, capital, or any form of intervention or special allocation to the council,” Ogunjimi told the committee.

He further disclosed that while the council requested an establishment grant of ₦27.4bn, the application was rejected because there was no budgetary provision for such expenditure.

The Accountant-General also explained that although the Central Bank of Nigeria opened two domiciliary accounts for the organisation to receive inflows, the accounts never became operational because the council failed to satisfy the regulatory conditions required for their activation.

Lawmakers expressed concern over how the purported agency was able to navigate several layers of government bureaucracy without raising suspicion.

Responding, Ogunjimi made what committee members described as one of the most significant revelations of the hearing.

“The letter that was received by the Treasury was respectfully addressed as coming from the State House. That letter was never issued by the State House”, he said

The disclosure prompted members of the committee to conclude that a “hijacked” State House letter had allegedly been used to mislead government institutions into processing official requests for an agency that had no legal existence.

The committee also questioned how civil servants originally posted to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser to the President eventually became attached to the purported council without the knowledge of the Office of the Accountant-General.

See also  FG declares holidays, deploys security amid terror alert ahead of Eid-el-Kabir celebration

Ogunjimi explained that two officers deployed to the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser in 2010 and 2013 remained in the office after it was allegedly taken over by the new council, but no formal communication was sent to the treasury notifying it of any change.

“It was never assumed or written to us that those two officers were being taken over. The staff also never reported to the office to say that another council had taken over the office and the name had changed. As far as I was concerned, we were dealing with a new agency, not the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he said.

He further disclosed that when the purported council later requested the deployment of five additional officers, the treasury approved only three after determining that the organisation’s size did not justify the number requested.

“It was when all this matter came to light that I got to know that two of our staff were actually working or being absorbed by the agency. We never knew. We believed, based on the records available to us, that those officers were still with the Office of the Chief Economic Adviser,” he added.

The ongoing House investigation centres on allegations that forged presidential approvals, counterfeit State House correspondence, fake Acts of the National Assembly and other falsified government documents were used to create and operate the purported Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council and the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

The committee has already heard evidence from the Nigeria Police Force, which confirmed that criminal charges bordering on conspiracy and fraud have been filed against the prime suspect, Adeyemi Adeniyi, at the Federal High Court.

See also  Oyo kidnap carried out by dislodged JAS terrorists — DHQ

At its sitting on Monday, the committee also directed the Inspector-General of Police to produce Adeyemi before lawmakers by noon on Wednesday to answer questions relating to the alleged forgery of official government documents and the operations of the purported presidential agency.

The committee is expected to conclude its investigation with recommendations on possible administrative, legislative and criminal actions against those found culpable.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

See full list of African countries that do not need proof of funds for UK’s student visa

Published

on

The United Kingdom on Monday updated its financial requirements for applicants seeking Student and Child Student visas, retaining stricter evidence rules while exempting nationals of only three African countries from submitting proof of funds at the point of application.

The updated guidance, published by the UK government on its website, listed Botswana, Mauritius and Tunisia as the only African countries whose nationals will not be required to provide financial evidence upfront unless requested during the visa decision-making process.

Other countries on the exemption list include Australia, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, among others.

Despite the exemption, the UK clarified that applicants from the listed countries must still meet all financial requirements and could be asked to provide evidence during the application process.

The guidance stated, “You must meet the financial requirements for this route when you apply; however, you may not need to submit evidence upfront as part of your application. In these circumstances, the decision maker may still request the evidence from you during the application process to prove you meet the financial requirements.”

The development means applicants from major African source countries for UK education, including Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Egypt and others not listed, will continue to submit financial documents as part of their visa applications.

Under the revised rules, applicants for a Student visa must demonstrate they have sufficient funds to cover tuition fees as stated on their Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies and living expenses.

See also  Companies sink N401bn into alternative power in three months due to blackouts

Students studying outside London are required to show they have £1,171 for each month of their course, up to a maximum of nine months, while those studying in London must show £1,529 per month for the same period.

Applicants travelling with dependants must also show additional funds. Those studying outside London must have £680 per month for each dependant, while applicants studying in London must show £845 monthly for each dependant, both for up to nine months.

For Child Student visa applicants, the required maintenance funds vary depending on their living arrangements, including boarding school accommodation, foster care, residence with parents or legal guardians, or independent living for eligible 16 and 17-year-olds.

The UK government also outlined acceptable sources of funds, including government-backed student loans, official financial sponsorship, personal savings and money belonging to parents or eligible partners.

However, it said applicants cannot rely on overdrafts, cryptocurrency holdings, stocks and shares, pensions or funds kept in unregulated financial institutions.

The guidance further requires applicants using personal or family funds to show that the required amount has been held for at least 28 consecutive days before the application, with financial evidence dated no more than 31 days before submission.

The UK also maintained exemptions from providing financial evidence for certain categories of applicants, including those applying to extend their stay after spending at least 12 months in the country on a valid visa, Student Union Sabbatical Officers, doctors and dentists in training, and applicants whose nationality qualifies for the reduced documentary requirement.

The latest update comes as the UK continues to tighten oversight of its international student visa system while maintaining financial eligibility requirements for prospective students seeking to study in the country.

See also  Correctional Service sacks 15 officers, demotes 59 in major sweep

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

Trending