Connect with us

News

FG eyes oil windfall to fund N9tn budget gap

Published

on

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Tuesday asked the National Assembly to approve a N9.09tn increase in the 2026 budget.

The government plans to finance the budget increase through crude oil gains linked to the Unites States-Iran conflict and by securing new loans

The Tinubu’s request, which signals a significant adjustment to the fiscal framework for the coming year, was conveyed in a letter read on the Senate floor by the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, during plenary on Tuesday.

Tinubu explained that the proposed adjustment is intended to enhance fiscal transparency and support the effective execution of key national programmes.

The letter reads, “The proposed adjustment is aimed at strengthening fiscal transparency and ensuring the effective implementation of priority national programmes.”

According to him, the review would allow the government to properly capture existing public debt obligations within the fiscal framework.

The adjustment, Tinubu added, would also provide for a limited number of strategic priority projects while aligning the 2026 financing plan to safeguard macroeconomic stability and reduce pressure on the domestic financial market.

However, the National Assembly passed the 2026 Appropriation Bill, increasing the budget to N68.32tn from the N58.18tn initially proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

An analysis by The PUNCH shows that adding the President’s N9.09tn request to the original proposal would bring the total to about N67.3tn. This indicates that the approved figure of N68.32tn includes an additional increase of roughly N1tn beyond the executive’s request.

The upward revision, according to lawmakers, is intended to clear legacy obligations, fund key infrastructure, strengthen the judiciary, boost healthcare interventions, and support preparations for the 2027 general elections.

Presenting the report, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Solomon Adeola, said the increase was necessary to address outstanding commitments and align the budget with prevailing economic conditions.

He said the adjustment would “regularise outstanding commitments from previous fiscal years, align the budget with current economic realities and maintain macroeconomic stability.”

Tinubu had originally presented the N58.18tn proposal to the National Assembly on December 19, 2025, under the theme, “Budget of Consolidation, Renewed Resilience and Shared Prosperity,” with a focus on economic growth, security and capital projects.

However, the version approved by both chambers reflects a significant expansion in spending.

A breakdown shows that N4.799tn is allocated to statutory transfers, N15.809tn to debt servicing, N15.427tn to recurrent (non-debt) expenditure, and N32.287tn to capital projects.

The committee explained that the N9.09tn increase followed a formal request from the President to include critical expenditures omitted in the initial proposal and to prevent unresolved obligations from undermining the 2026 fiscal plan.

A major component of the adjustment is the rollover of N7.71tn in outstanding capital obligations from the 2025 budget.

Lawmakers noted that about 70 per cent of capital projects in the 2025 Appropriation Act were affected by revenue shortfalls, necessitating a carryover into 2026 to avoid abandonment and rising costs.

Beyond legacy liabilities, new provisions were introduced for strategic interventions across key sectors.

These include N478.6bn as the Federal Government’s equity contribution under the Ministry of Finance Incorporated framework to support rail projects in Lagos, Kano, Kaduna and Ogun States, as well as feasibility studies for urban rail systems in Enugu and Maiduguri and upgrades to the narrow-gauge rail network.

The committee also approved N8.96bn for feasibility studies on the Calabar–Maiduguri corridor and the Maiduguri–Sokoto superhighway under the Tinubu National Beltway Initiative.

In the health sector, an additional $344.83m, equivalent to about N482.76bn, was allocated for priority interventions under bilateral agreements, aimed at improving healthcare infrastructure and service delivery.

The judiciary received increased funding, including N98.5bn for the Court of Appeal, N36.7bn for the Supreme Court and N268.54bn to restore its budget ceiling and accommodate the appointment of more judges ahead of the 2027 elections.

Lawmakers stressed that strengthening the judiciary was essential to handling election-related disputes and ensuring timely justice.

To finance the expanded budget, the committee proposed a combination of revenue measures and borrowing.

This includes a $10 per barrel increase in the oil benchmark, expected to generate about N2.592tn in additional revenue.

The committee also highlighted improved contributions from the telecommunications sector following tariff adjustments and policy reforms.

It is projected that MTN Nigeria would generate N724bn in company income tax in 2026, while Airtel Nigeria is expected to contribute N150bn, bringing total additional revenue from the sector to N874bn.

Despite these measures, lawmakers approved an increase in external borrowing by N6.163tn to bridge the financing gap, noting that the borrowing remains within manageable limits.

The report stated that the 2026 budget is designed to strengthen macroeconomic stability, improve the business environment, create jobs and reduce poverty.

It added that priority sectors include security, infrastructure, health, education and human capital development.

See also  Court defers Nnamdi Kanu’s transfer appeal, rejects brother’s representation

The committee recalled that the Senate had debated the general principles of the bill in December 2025 before subjecting it to detailed scrutiny, including engagements with the President’s economic team.

It said a public hearing held on February 9, 2026, themed ‘From Budget to Impact,’ drew inputs from government agencies, civil society groups, development partners and private sector stakeholders.

However, lawmakers raised concerns over delays in fund releases and other bureaucratic challenges that affected the implementation of the 2025 budget.

They called for urgent reforms, warning that such bottlenecks could weaken the impact of the 2026 fiscal plan.

The committee recommended stronger collaboration between the executive and legislature, as well as improved oversight to ensure the timely execution of projects.

It also proposed extending the 2025 Appropriation Act to June 30, 2026, to allow for the completion of ongoing projects.

Adeola commended members of the committee and stakeholders for their contributions, noting that collaboration with the House of Representatives ensured a balanced report.

He urged the Senate to approve the revised bill, describing it as critical to sustaining economic gains, addressing structural challenges and setting the country on a path of growth.

Like the Senate, the House of Representatives also passed the N68.30tn Appropriation Bill for the 2026 fiscal year.

At a plenary on Tuesday, presided over by the Speaker, Tajudeen Abbas, the House also approved extending the implementation of the capital component of the 2025 budget from March 31 to June 30, 2026.

Of the proposed total expenditure of N68.30tn, N34.33tn is the projected revenue for the year. Budget deficit is N23.85tn, representing 4.28 per cent of the Gross Domestic Product.

Macroeconomic assumptions of the budget consist of an oil benchmark of $64.85 per barrel, a production target of 1.84 million barrels per day, and an exchange rate of N1,400 to a dollar.

The Federal Government’s share of the main revenue pool is projected at N21.62tn, while the revenue targets for tax and non-tax sources are N124.25tn and N845.98 bn, respectively.

The government also hopes to generate N1.37tn from foreign aid and grants, with government-owned enterprises expected to contribute N10.27tn to the revenue pool.

The Federal Government allocated N618.13bn to the Niger Delta Development Commission, N244.07bn to the North-East Development Commission and N145bn to the North-West Development Commission. The South-West, South-South, South-East and North-West Development commissions had a statutory transfer of N140bn each.

Other statutory transfers include the National Assembly (N577.85bn), the Independent National Electoral Commission (N1tn), the National Human Rights Commission (N20bn) and the Public Complaints Commission (N29.46bn).

Also, domestic debt servicing, including ways and means, got N10.16tn, while foreign debt was allocated N5.36tn.

The presidency was allocated N142.42bn, the Ministry of Defence (N2.69tn), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (N287.90bn), and the Office of the Head of the Service of the Federation (N17.17bn), among others.

Addressing lawmakers shortly before the passage of the budget, the Chairman, House Committee on Appropriation, Mr Abubakar Bichi, said all amounts appropriated in the proposal shall be released from the Consolidated Revenue Fund of the Federation only for the purpose specified in the executive bill.

On virement, the Kano lawmaker noted that “if the implementation of any of the projects intended to be undertaken under this bill cannot be completed without virement, such virement shall only be effected with the prior approval of the National Assembly.”

He called on the Accountant General of the Federation to “immediately, upon coming into force of this bill, maintain a separate record for the documentation of revenue accruing to the Consolidated Revenue Fund in excess of the oil price benchmark adopted in this budget.”

According to Bichi, “such revenues refer to monies accruing from sales of government crude oil in excess of the approved benchmark price per barrel, the Petroleum Profit Tax and Royalty on Oil and Gas.”

With the Senate similarly passing the budget proposal, it is expected to be transmitted to the President for assent in the coming days.

Tinubu’s $6bn loan

The Senate and House of Representatives have also approved President Bola Tinubu’s request to secure fresh external loans totalling $6bn, in a move aimed at plugging fiscal gaps and financing key infrastructure projects.

The approval followed the presentation and consideration of reports by the Chairmen of the Senate and House Committees on Local and Foreign Debts, Senator Aliyu Wamakko (APC, Sokoto North) and his House of Representatives counterpart, Abubakar Nalaraba, on Tuesday.

The red chamber’s decision came just hours after the President formally wrote to the Senate seeking legislative backing for the facilities, underscoring the Executive’s push to shore up funding for priority sectors.

In a letter addressed to the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and read during plenary, Tinubu sought approval to borrow $5bn from Abu Dhabi Bank to support budget deficit financing and meet existing debt obligations.

See also  Jigawa sacks 22 over Ramadan feeding scam

The president said the facility would be made available to Nigeria in tranches.

The letter partly read, “The purpose of this letter is to request for the approval and resolution of the national assembly pursuant to the provisions of section 21(1) and 27(1) of the debt management office establishment act 2003 to establish a structured total return swap derivative external financing programme from First Abu Dhabi Bank of the United Arab Emirates of up to $5bn which will be made available to the Federal Republic of Nigeria in tranches.”

Tinubu said the proceeds would be used for budget implementation, development of priority infrastructure projects and repayment of relatively expensive domestic and external debts.

He added that the facility would also help the federal government meet urgent financial obligations when necessary.

The president said Nigeria’s total public debt currently stands at $110.3bn, equivalent to about N159.2tn as of December 31, 2025.

In a separate letter, the president sought approval for a $1bn UK export finance loan facility arranged by Citibank, London branch.

Tinubu noted that the projects—covering the Lagos Port Complex and Tin Can Island Port—are designed to tackle longstanding operational challenges and reposition Nigeria’s maritime sector.

“The rehabilitation of the ports project is a strategic modernisation initiative of the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Nigerian Ports Authority to restore and upgrade two of Nigeria’s most vital ports, namely Tin Can Island Port complex and Lagos Port complex, Apapa, which have reached critical engineering failures,” the letter read.

Following the reading of the requests, Akpabio had referred both letters to the Senate Committee on Local and Foreign Debts, directing the panel to expedite consideration and report back promptly—a directive that culminated in Tuesday’s approval.

The latest borrowing request comes amid the Federal Government’s continued reliance on a mix of domestic and external loans to finance budget deficits and critical infrastructure.

Shortly after both letters were read by Mr Abbas, the requests were referred to the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debts Management.

The House thereafter dissolved into the Committee of Supply to consider the report.

Speaking on the substance of the request, Nalaraba who represents Awe/Doma/Keana Federal Constituency, Nasarawa State said, “The House should consider the report of the Committee on Aids, Loans and Debt Management on the request for approval to establish a structured total return swap an external financing programme of $5bn with First Abu Dhabi Bank, to support Federal Government funding and fiscal liquidity management and approve recommendations therein.”

According to him, “the implementation of a total return swap transaction involving the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank in aggregate principal amount of up to $5bn together with the collateralisation of the transaction by the issuance of naira-denominated FGN Securities to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC as collateral for the loan of up to 133.3 per cent of the amount drawn.”

The Committee recommended that the Federal Government of Nigeria make margining payments to First Abu Dhabi Bank PJSC in dollars upon demand if, at any time, either due to fluctuations in the market prices of the Federal Government securities or as a result of movements in exchange rate or both, the value of the collateral issued to First Abu Dhabi Bank falls below the initial value at the time of issuance.”

Another recommendation includes “that the $5bn should be drawn down in tranches, with each tranche comprising a corresponding confirmation and other ancillary agreements (as may be required) between the Federal Government of Nigeria and First Abu Dhabi Bank.

“Authorisation of the use of proceeds for budget implementation, development of key infrastructure projects, which are of priority to the administration, repayment of relatively more expensive domestic and external debts in the Federal Government of Nigeria’s public debt portfolio.”

Both loan requests were unanimously approved when the lawmakers returned to plenary from the Committee on Supply, where the consideration took place.

Expert react

Commenting, the Chief Executive Officer of CSA Advisory and a development economist, Aliyu Ilias, urged the Federal Government to prioritise security, economic productivity and targeted support measures in deploying the proposed N9tn budget expansion.

Speaking in a telephone interview with our correspondent, Ilias said strengthening security should be the government’s foremost priority, noting that economic growth would remain constrained without stability across the country.

“The first sector these funds should be channelled into is security. Once we are able to stabilise the security situation, then we can look at the economy, particularly trade and industry, to make things actually work,” he said.

He also called for targeted interventions to cushion the impact of rising crude oil prices on Nigerians, suggesting that some form of subsidy or support mechanism may still be necessary.

See also  Presidency Gives Update On Edun’s Health Status

“I also expect a form of relative subsidy in terms of helping people to mitigate the effect of the rising price of crude oil and its impact on petrol prices. It can even be extended to critical players like Dangote as some form of leverage, if funds can be directed to that sector,” he added.

On the proposed budget review, Ilias said the move was not unexpected, citing Nigeria’s historical trend of revising budgets during the fiscal cycle.

He pointed to structural issues in past budgets, particularly the low implementation of capital projects, as justification for a larger fiscal framework.

The economist further explained that changes in global oil prices have altered Nigeria’s revenue outlook, creating room for upward budget adjustments.

While supporting a larger budget size, Ilias emphasised the need for improved revenue generation to sustain increased spending.

“For me, I am an advocate of a bigger budget, but only if we can strengthen our revenue side. A bigger budget allows us to implement more projects and drive development,” he stated.

He also stressed the importance of increasing capital expenditure, warning that rising global volatility could worsen Nigeria’s debt profile.

Ilias, however, cautioned that the effectiveness of the budget review would ultimately depend on how well the additional funds are utilised.

Also speaking, an economist, Professor Adeola Adenikinju, urged the Federal Government to prioritise the power sector, social investment programmes, infrastructure, and agriculture to address the country’s economic challenges and improve citizens’ welfare.

Speaking on key areas requiring urgent government attention, Adenikinju stressed the importance of electricity for economic growth and welfare.

“I think the power sector is very important. The power sector? Yes, given the role that the power sector, or electricity, plays in economic growth and welfare generally. The power sector is very important,” he said.

While noting that the sector has already been privatised, the economist pointed out that several unresolved challenges persist.

“I know it is privatised, but there are legacy issues that require further attention. The huge debt that is being owed is probably because of issues with tariffs,” he said.

According to him, the government must address major infrastructure gaps in the electricity value chain.

“We have to fix some of the infrastructural issues, particularly the transmission and distribution segments that are not working well. That is one sector that is very important,” he added.

Beyond power, Adenikinju also called for stronger social protection programmes to cushion the impact of ongoing economic reforms on vulnerable citizens.

“Then the government needs to pay more attention to social investment expenditure because a lot of people are feeling the impact of reform,” he said.

He noted that reforms introduced by the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu had intensified inflationary pressures on households.

“The effect of the economic reforms that the president started about three years ago—removal of subsidy, the single-unit pricing, all of that—has led to severe inflation in the economy and has impacted negatively on the welfare of people,” he said.

Adenikinju emphasised that targeted relief measures are necessary for citizens most affected by the reforms.

“There needs to be an effective way of providing relief to very poor people who are badly affected by the reforms. Social investment is very important to take care of those who are extremely vulnerable and who are struggling,” he added.

The economist also identified poor infrastructure, particularly road networks, as a major contributor to rising food prices across the country.

“The other sector that I will mention is infrastructure. Our roads are bad. The roads leading to rural areas are very bad. Therefore, that has driven up the cost of food in many urban areas where a lot of consumers are,” he said.

He noted that improving transport links between rural production areas and urban markets would help reduce food costs.

“The road infrastructure has to be looked at. It has to be improved, especially the rural–urban areas and from the food-producing areas to urban centres,” he said.

Adenikinju further stressed the need for greater government support for farmers through improved access to agricultural inputs.

“Finally, I will say agriculture—by providing food seedlings for farmers and supporting fertilisers,” he said.

He warned that rising fertiliser prices, driven by global factors, were also affecting local food production.

“The prices of fertilisers have gone up because of the war. They also have to be supported. So these are the areas that I think should be prioritised, in my view,” he added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click “I Understand and Opt In.”
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

“If response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,” it stated.

See also  Kebbi gov signs N642.9bn 2026 budget into law

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

“Upon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,” the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

“Applicant may track successful application two weeks after submission via https://track.immigration.gov.ng or on the NIS Mobile App,” the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects ‘big racket’ behind ‘fake’ agency’s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient. “I don’t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiry”, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged ₦27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

“Nigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

“Who gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; it’s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

“We are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?”, Babachir queried.

See also  NSCDC deploys 10,000 personnel for Anambra gov poll

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,… “So you see, that’s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. It’s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. That’s why the thing came up. So it didn’t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.”

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGF’s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, “It’s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense there’s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

“Because first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you don’t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Obi, Kwankwaso launch joint movement before ADC primaries

“That’s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless there’s a dereliction of duty by the SGF’s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.”

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

“It is a legislative oversight. This government—this National Assembly—has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They don’t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.”

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agency’s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

“Why are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesn’t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesn’t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

“Those are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened now”, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  Power outages, insecurity top business challenges – CBN survey

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staff’s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as “a murderer” and “an assassin”.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: “not only false but gravely defamatory,” adding that the allegations were “designed to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.”

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamila’s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  See how Dangote refinery and marketers fuel deal crashed

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemi’s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

“You have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,” the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to “fabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.”

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

“It is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,” the letter stated.

It added, “Trial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.”Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamila’s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Kebbi gov signs N642.9bn 2026 budget into law

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending