Connect with us

News

๐—˜๐˜…-๐—œ๐—–๐—”๐—ก ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ข๐—ด๐˜‚๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐˜ 90

Published

on

The Ondo Kingdom has been thrown into mourning following the death of its Traditional Prime Minister, High Chief Simeon Oguntimehin, a former President of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria, who passed away peacefully on March 30, 2026, at the age of 91.

In a statement issued on Friday by the family through his daughter, Mrs. Omonike Omonubi, his passing was described as a peaceful transition after a life of service to his community, profession, and country.

โ€œWith gratitude to God for a life well spent, we announce the passing of our father, High Chief (Sir) Simeon Olusola Oguntimehin, who transitioned peacefully on March 30, 2026, at the age of 91,โ€ the family said.

Until his death, Oguntimehin held the revered title of Lisa and Traditional Prime Minister of the Ondo Kingdom, where he served as a key adviser within the traditional council and played a central role in preserving the customs and traditions of the ancient town.

As Lisa Fiwagboye, he was widely regarded as a pillar of leadership in the kingdom, known for his wisdom, diplomacy, and commitment to traditional governance.

โ€œHe lived a fulfilled life marked by integrity, humility, and unwavering dedication to both community and nation,โ€ the family added.

Beyond his traditional responsibilities, Oguntimehin was a distinguished professional in Nigeriaโ€™s financial sector and public service.

He served as President of ICAN between 1995 and 1996, where he was credited with strengthening professional ethics and advancing reforms within the accounting profession.

โ€œHe was a strong advocate of professional excellence and ethical standards in the accounting profession,โ€ a statement attributed to ICAN sources noted.

See also  Sowore insists on protest, urges police to protect protesters

He also served as a board member of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission from 2007 to 2011, contributing to efforts aimed at improving transparency and accountability in public institutions.

In 1978, shortly after the creation of Ondo State, he made history as the first Chairman of the State Public Accounts Committee, laying the groundwork for financial oversight and fiscal discipline.

A close associate described him as โ€œa bridge between tradition and modern governance,โ€ adding that โ€œhis counsel was always sought on matters of public accountability and leadership.โ€

He was a recipient of the national honour of Officer of the Order of the Niger and also held the titles of Justice of the Peace and Knight of St. Christopher.

Tributes have continued to pour in from colleagues, traditional rulers, and professional bodies, who described him as a man of rare integrity and service.

โ€œNigeria has lost a statesman who combined professional excellence with traditional leadership,โ€ one tribute read.

The family expressed appreciation for the outpouring of condolences from across the country.

Funeral arrangements, according to the family, will be announced in due course.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Step-by-step guide for contactless passport renewal for Nigerians abroad

Published

on

The Nigeria Immigration Service has released an updated step-by-step guide for Nigerians living abroad to renew their passports through its Contactless Passport Application System.

The Service announced the update in a post on its official X handle on Tuesday, encouraging Nigerians in the diaspora to take advantage of the digital platform.

According to the Service, the application process involves the following steps:

1. Visit the official NIS Passport Application portal.
2. Select Continue from the pop-up window.
3. Click Apply for Renewal/Re-issue.
4. Create an account and verify your identity using your National Identification Number and date of birth.
5. Complete the application form and choose your preferred processing embassy or high commission.
6. Upload the required documents.
7. Pay the passport fee for your selected booklet.
8. Obtain your Application ID and Reference Number.
9. Select the Contactless option under the Application Status/Book Appointment section.
10. Review the contactless instructions and click โ€œI Understand and Opt In.โ€
11. Download the NIS Mobile App.
12. Log in or create a profile on the app.
13. Select Passport Application Services.
14. Click Passport Biometrics Enrolment, enter your Application ID and Reference Number, and check your eligibility.
15. Capture your facial image and fingerprints.
16. Complete the liveness verification.
17. Pay the contactless service fee.
18. Submit your biometrics.

The Service, however, noted that not all applicants would qualify for the contactless process.

โ€œIf response is INELIGIBLE, then it means applicant should return to the landing page of the portal to book physical appointment at the Embassy/High Commission,โ€ it stated.

See also  Bandits, Kidnappers Are Our Children โ€“ Bishop Kukah

For applicants who successfully complete the contactless biometric enrolment, the NIS said additional documents must be forwarded to the selected processing mission.

โ€œUpon successful completion of biometrics via Contactless App, applicant should print-out the Application form, passport booklet payment, biometric payment, current Passport and enclose all in a self-addressed return envelope to the processing embassy selected during the application process,โ€ the Service said.

It added that applicants would be able to monitor the progress of their applications after submission.

โ€œApplicant may track successful application two weeks after submission viaย https://track.immigration.gov.ngย or on the NIS Mobile App,โ€ the Service added.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

Continue Reading

News

PFIPC scandal: Ex-SGF Babachir Lawal suspects โ€˜big racketโ€™ behind โ€˜fakeโ€™ agencyโ€™s budget code

Published

on

A former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, has called for a judicial inquiry into the controversy surrounding the alleged fake Presidential Fiscal and Infrastructure Projects Council (PFIPC), arguing that the scandal points to deep institutional failures rather than a simple administrative error.

Speaking in an interview with ARISE NEWS on Monday, Lawal said the circumstances surrounding the alleged agency suggested the existence of a wider network that enabled it to function within government processes despite questions over its legal status.

He insisted that an administrative investigation alone would be insufficient.ย โ€œI donโ€™t think it should even be administrative alone; it should be a judicial inquiryโ€, the former SGF clearly stated.

Lawal questioned claims surrounding an alleged โ‚ฆ27.5bn take-off grant reportedly linked to the agency, asking how such funds could have been approved and released if the organisation had no legal basis.

โ€œNigerians are talking about how N1.3bn was inserted into the budget. The man himself first said the quarrel came about because he refused to part with 48% of the 27-point-something billion Naira take-off grant. That money has been spent before this budget office was looking for the budget.

โ€œWho gave him the money? It was not appropriated for; itโ€™s not in any budget, that N27.5bn Naira for which he says somebody demanded 48%. Who gave him the money? How did the process of generating the request for the release come up? How did it go through?

โ€œWe are just talking about the tip of the iceberg here. Down there, before we got to here, N27.5bn had already been disbursed, according to him, as a take-off grant. How did that money get to him? It was not in the budget. So this is what should frighten us. If such money can go to a fictitious organisation, we only now begin to see it when we are quarrelling about how it got into the budget. How did that money get to them?โ€, Babachir queried.

See also  US lawmaker urges Trump to take โ€˜forceful actionโ€™ over Plateau attack

The former SGF argued that the controversy only became public because of disagreements over the sharing of funds rather than because government oversight mechanisms functioned effectively.

He continued,โ€ฆ โ€œSo you see, thatโ€™s how we got to know this to start with. That is the reason why we got to know this on his side of the coin. Itโ€™s about the sharing of the N27.5bn. Thatโ€™s why the thing came up. So it didnโ€™t work. It should have worked before that money left the government coffers into the account of the agency.โ€

Lawal also alleged that the scandal reflected broader institutional weaknesses within the current administration, arguing that the Office of the SGF should have detected any irregularities before the matter progressed through official channels.

He maintained that the SGFโ€™s office bears responsibility for identifying and flagging agencies without legal backing before their requests or budgets proceed through government.

He said, โ€œItโ€™s institutional compromise, because in this, I sense thereโ€™s quite a big racket going on somewhere along the line. If the agency was created by maybe one big man alone, and then he wants to go through the budget process, the budget office assigns the budget code according to the chart of accounts in GIFMIS. So, how did they manage to assign the budget code for this agency that does not exist? Who inserted it?

โ€œBecause first of all, the budget office issues a budget call circular to MDAs, and everybody starts to prepare his budget according to the budget line. They give you ceilings, and you prepare your budget and forward it to the budget office as an agency or ministry. Now, the Ministry of Budget and Planning would, in our time, call every MDA to come and defend its budget. Now, if you donโ€™t exist, how did they recognise that you are a genuine entity? Who gave out the budget code and allowed their budget to pass?

See also  Bandits, Kidnappers Are Our Children โ€“ Bishop Kukah

โ€œThatโ€™s what oversight is. The SGF should be able to know, because before it gets to the National Assembly, that budget goes through the SGF. Unless thereโ€™s a dereliction of duty by the SGFโ€™s office, the responsibility to flag that this is a fake agency would have come from them.โ€

Lawal further criticised the National Assembly, accusing lawmakers of failing to thoroughly scrutinise budget proposals.

โ€œIt is a legislative oversight. This governmentโ€”this National Assemblyโ€”has no interest in scrutinising the budget that comes before them. Most of the legislators just go in there to earn their salaries and collect allowances and go. They donโ€™t scrutinise the budget line by line. We all know how this particular government works. There are some people that when they talk, nobody else has the authority to contravene.โ€

He also suggested that public attention should focus not only on the agencyโ€™s legal status but on the individuals who allegedly enabled its operations.

โ€œWhy are you interested in N27.5bn that had already been collected and spent? We are talking about an agency that we are claiming doesnโ€™t exist. Maybe it exists, but it doesnโ€™t have a legal framework for its existence. But it exists. And there are a lot of powerful people that make sure it exists in that form.

โ€œThose are the people we need to expose. The Chief of Staff, in particular, is so powerful. The SGF is there, just reneging on his responsibilities. And nothing has happened nowโ€, he concluded.

punch.ng

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

 

See also  โ€˜Not Registered For Saleโ€™ โ€“ NAFDAC Addresses Indomie Recall Fears

Continue Reading

News

Fake Agency Scandal: Gbajabiamila threatens Adeyemi with N10bn defamation suit

Published

on

Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, ha threatened to initiate legal steps against Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi, and demand N10 billion in damages over allegations linking him to murder, bribery and other criminal activities.

The move was conveyed in a letter dated July 6, 2026, signed by Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Kemi Pinheiro, on behalf of Pinheiro LP, the Chief of Staffโ€™s legal representatives.

The dispute stems from a press conference held by Adeyemi on June 25, during which he accused Gbajabiamila of seeking a share of the alleged take-off funds of the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council (PFIPC), receiving money through intermediaries, abusing his office and participating in efforts to conceal wrongdoing.Death & Tragedy

During the briefing, Adeyemi also referred to the Chief of Staff as โ€œa murdererโ€ and โ€œan assassinโ€.

The Presidency has consistently maintained that the PFIPC is a fictitious organisation, despite its appearance in the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Gbajabiamilaโ€™s lawyers dismissed all the allegations as entirely false and defamatory, saying they were intended to damage his reputation.

The letter stated: โ€œnot only false but gravely defamatory,โ€ adding that the allegations were โ€œdesigned to portray our client as corrupt, dishonest, criminally culpable, morally bankrupt, administratively incompetent, a murderer and unfit to occupy public office.โ€

According to the legal team, Adeyemi is already standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja in Charge No. FHC/ABJ/CR/652/2026, FRN v. Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew & Ors, over allegations including forgery of an appointment letter bearing Gbajabiamilaโ€™s purported signature and the alleged counterfeiting of Presidential letter-headed papers to present himself as a government official.Nigeria Investment Guide

See also  โ€˜Not Registered For Saleโ€™ โ€“ NAFDAC Addresses Indomie Recall Fears

The lawyers further rejected Adeyemiโ€™s claims that Gbajabiamila demanded 48 per cent of a purported N27.4 billion take-off grant for the council, amounting to about N12.5 billion, or that he received N400 million through proxies connected to appointments within the organisation.

Other allegations dismissed in the letter included claims that the Chief of Staff intimidated individuals and media organisations, manipulated budget processes, attempted to misuse security agencies and performed official duties while under the influence of intoxicating substances.Trending News Feed

Gbajabiamila also denied ever having any relationship with Adeyemi.

โ€œYou have never at any time met, interacted with, communicated with, or had any form of personal or official dealing whatsoever with him,โ€ the lawyers wrote, adding that the decision to โ€œfabricate and publish allegations against a person with whom you have had absolutely no relationship or interaction underscores the reckless, baseless and malicious nature of your publication.โ€

The legal team also criticised the timing of the allegations, noting that they were made after criminal proceedings had already been instituted against Adeyemi.

โ€œIt is even more disturbing to our client that you resorted to defaming him through your press statements after a criminal Charge had been filed against you,โ€ the letter stated.

It added, โ€œTrial by media remains unknown to Nigerian law and cannot be a substitute for due process.โ€Nigeria Investment Guide

Gbajabiamilaโ€™s lawyers demanded that Adeyemi immediately stop making further defamatory statements, remove all related videos, recordings and transcripts from every platform, issue a full retraction and apology in at least five national newspapers and across all social media platforms used to circulate the claims, and provide a written undertaking that he would refrain from making further allegations.

See also  Kebbi schoolgirlsโ€™ abduction: DHQ summons, grills soldiers in Abuja

The letter warned that failure to comply would result in both criminal defamation proceedings under the laws of the Federal Capital Territory and a civil lawsuit seeking N10 billion in aggravated and exemplary damages. The damages, it said, would be donated to a charity chosen by Gbajabiamila. The legal action would also seek a perpetual injunction and a court order compelling the publication of an apology.

The controversy centres on the PFIPC, which was listed in the 2026 Appropriation Act under the title Presidential Economic Advisory Council/Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council and received more than N1.3 billion in budgetary allocations, including about N803 million for personnel, N200 million for overhead and N300 million for capital expenditure.

Adeyemi had argued during his June 25 press conference that an agency included in a budget signed by the President could not be regarded as non-existent.

However, the Presidency insists the council is fraudulent and has no legal existence.

Meanwhile, human rights lawyer Femi Falana has argued that the Presidency lacks the constitutional authority to clear anyone involved in the dispute and has called for an independent investigation into the allegations against both Gbajabiamila and Adeyemi.

Adeyemi is scheduled to appear before the Federal High Court on July 27, 2026.

FOLLOW US ON:

FACEBOOK

TWITTER

PINTEREST

TIKTOK

YOUTUBE

LINKEDIN

INSTAGRAM

Continue Reading

Trending